Improvement of a Clinical Score for Necrotizing Fasciitis: 'Pain Out of Proportion' and High CRP Levels Aid the Diagnosis

Necrotizing Fasciitis With Myonecrosis in a Diabetic Patient: Highlighting the Role of Early Detection and Management

Necrotizing fasciitis (NF) is a life-threatening soft tissue infection that progresses rapidly and can lead to systemic complications. Myonecrosis, a severe complication of NF, involves muscle tissue death and often requires aggressive treatment. A 35-year-old female with diabetes mellitus, dyslipidemia, obesity, and a history of right breast cancer presented with acute, progressive right thigh pain, fever, and vomiting. Physical examination revealed local swelling, tenderness, warmth, and systemic signs of infection. Laboratory tests showed leukocytosis, elevated C-reactive protein, renal impairment, and hyponatremia. Contrast-enhanced MRI of the right thigh raised suspicion of NF with focal myonecrosis in the vastus lateralis and intermedius muscles. Surgical exploration and histopathology confirmed NF and myonecrosis. Debridement and broad-spectrum antibiotics, including vancomycin, meropenem, and clindamycin, were started. A second debridement and follow-up MRI showed improvement, with the patient recovering well and being discharged without complications. Early imaging, aggressive surgical intervention, and appropriate antibiotic therapy are critical in managing NF and myonecrosis, particularly in high-risk patients.

Validation of Laboratory Risk Indicator for Necrotizing Fasciitis (LRINEC) score and establishment of novel score in Japanese patients with necrotizing fasciitis (J-LRINEC score)

The Laboratory Risk Indicator for Necrotizing Fasciitis (LRINEC) score is widely used to distinguish between necrotizing fasciitis and cellulitis. However, LRINEC scores are not as sensitive or specific as initially reported, possibly due to differences in patient backgrounds in different countries. Here, we examined the validity of LRINEC scores in Japanese patients. We also investigated the possibility of developing a new scoring system. Patients with necrotizing fasciitis (n = 56) and cellulitis (n = 209) were retrospectively evaluated. The data were split into training (n = 199) and validation (n = 66) datasets. A logistic regression analysis was used to calculate the C-statistics of the LRINEC scores. A new equation was formulated using logistic regression analysis with an appropriate variable selection (Laboratory Risk Indicator for Necrotizing Fasciitis for Japanese Patients [J-LRINEC] score). The J-LRINEC score had a C-statistic of 0.9683, sensitivity of 91.4%, and specificity of 84.8%. The LRINEC score had a C-statistic of 0.914 and specificity of 96%; however, its usefulness was limited by its sensitivity of 68.9%. Our results suggest that the LRINEC score is valid for Japanese patients; however, the J-LRINEC score showed higher sensitivity and specificity, suggesting that it may be a useful tool for differentiating cellulitis from necrotizing fasciitis among Japanese patients.

Neutrophil diversity and function in health and disease

Neutrophils, the most abundant type of granulocyte, are widely recognized as one of the pivotal contributors to the acute inflammatory response. Initially, neutrophils were considered the mobile infantry of the innate immune system, tasked with the immediate response to invading pathogens. However, recent studies have demonstrated that neutrophils are versatile cells, capable of regulating various biological processes and impacting both human health and disease. Cytokines and other active mediators regulate the functional activity of neutrophils by activating multiple receptors on these cells, thereby initiating downstream signal transduction pathways. Dysfunctions in neutrophils and disruptions in neutrophil homeostasis have been implicated in the pathogenesis of numerous diseases, including cancer and inflammatory disorders, often due to aberrant intracellular signaling. This review provides a comprehensive synthesis of neutrophil biological functions, integrating recent advancements in this field. Moreover, it examines the biological roles of receptors on neutrophils and downstream signaling pathways involved in the regulation of neutrophil activity. The pathophysiology of neutrophils in numerous human diseases and emerging therapeutic approaches targeting them are also elaborated. This review also addresses the current limitations within the field of neutrophil research, highlighting critical gaps in knowledge that warrant further investigation. In summary, this review seeks to establish a comprehensive and multidimensional model of neutrophil regulation, providing new perspectives for potential clinical applications and further research.

The intricate pathogenicity of Group A Streptococcus: A comprehensive update

Group A Streptococcus (GAS) is a versatile pathogen that targets human lymphoid, decidual, skin, and soft tissues. Recent advancements have shed light on its airborne transmission, lymphatic spread, and interactions with neuronal systems. GAS promotes severe inflammation through mechanisms involving inflammasomes, IL-1β, and T-cell hyperactivation. Additionally, it secretes factors that directly induce skin necrosis via Gasdermin activation and sustains survival and replication in human blood through sophisticated immune evasion strategies. These include lysis of erythrocytes, using red cell membranes for camouflage, resisting antimicrobial peptides, evading phagocytosis, escaping from neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs), inactivating chemokines, and cleaving targeted antibodies. GAS also employs molecular mimicry to traverse connective tissues undetected and exploits the host's fibrinolytic system, which contributes to its stealth and potential for causing autoimmune conditions after repeated infections. Secreted toxins disrupt host cell membranes, enhancing intracellular survival and directly activating nociceptor neurons to induce pain. Remarkably, GAS possesses mechanisms for precise genome editing to defend against phages, and its fibrinolytic capabilities have found applications in medicine. Immune responses to GAS are paradoxical: robust responses to its virulence factors correlate with more severe disease, whereas recurrent infections often show diminished immune reactions. This review focuses on the multifaceted virulence of GAS and introduces novel concepts in understanding its pathogenicity.

Current diagnosis and management of necrotizing soft tissue infections: What you need to know

ABSTRACT

Necrotizing soft tissue infections are rare bacterial infections of the skin and soft tissues with a high morbidity and mortality rate, requiring prompt diagnosis and surgical intervention. These represent a spectrum of disease resulting in tissue necrosis that is rapidly progressive; however, they remain a diagnostic challenge because the average surgeon or emergency medicine provider may only see one or two over the course of their career. Diagnosis is largely clinical and based on subtle physical examination findings, physiologic instability, and laboratory derangements. Aids to diagnosis such as scoring systems and cross-sectional imaging may be used; however, the findings are not specific, so management should not be based on these alone. The most common cause of necrotizing soft tissue infection is polymicrobial infection; however, specific bacteria such as clostridial species, group A streptococcal, methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus , and aquatic bacteria may also be causative. Initial management includes broad spectrum antibiotics, fluid resuscitation for severe sepsis, and early aggressive surgical debridement. Often, these patients require multiple operative debridement to achieve source control, and a low threshold for repeat debridement should be maintained because these infections can progress rapidly. Once source control is achieved, patients may be left with extensive wounds requiring multidisciplinary care and wound management. Necrotizing infections have long been viewed based on mortality outcomes alone because of their rarity and severity. Over recent years, more reports have shown a decrease in the mortality rates from those previously reported, allowing for a focus on methods to improve morbidity of these infections.

Severe skin and soft tissue infection in cohort patients admitted in a teaching hospital in Belgium: identification of risk factors for surgery

BACKGROUND

Necrotizing soft tissue infections (NSTIs) are associated with significant mortality if not promptly diagnosed and surgically treated.

AIM

This study aims to compare patients with severe skin and soft tissue infection treated with or without a surgical intervention and to identify risk factors that can predict the need for early surgery.

METHODS

Demographics, clinical, laboratory, Risk Indicator for Necrotizing Fasciitis (LRINEC) and imaging results were retrospectively collected.

RESULTS

There were 91 non-NSTI (group 1), 26 NSTI who were operated (group 2) and eight suspected NSTI who were not operated (group 3). In the multivariate analysis, skin necrosis, tachycardia, CRP value and hyperglycemia were predictive for surgery. A performance analysis revealed AUC of 0.65 (95%CI: 0.52-0.78) as to the LRINEC score for the use of surgery. The AUC for a predictive model associating four variables (heart rate, skin necrosis, CRP and glycemia at admission) was 0.71 (95%CI: 0.59-0.84). In terms of outcome, the median length of stay (LOS) was statistically higher in group 2 vs. group 1 (seven days (5-15) vs. 34 days (20-42), p < .001) and in group 2 vs. group 3 (34 days (20-42) vs. 14 days (11-19), p = .005). The overall in-hospital mortality at 30 days was 3.2% and did not statistically differ between the three groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Although the LRINEC score performed well in predicting surgery, the AUC of a model combining four predictive variables (glycemia, skin necrosis, CRP and heart rate) was superior. Further research is needed to validate this model.

Real-time identification of life-threatening necrotizing soft-tissue infections using indocyanine green fluorescence imaging

Significance

Necrotizing soft-tissue infections (NSTIs) are life-threatening infections with a cumulative case fatality rate of 21%. The initial presentation of an NSTI is non-specific, frequently leading to misdiagnosis and delays in care. No current strategies yield an accurate, real-time diagnosis of an NSTI.

Aim

A first-in-kind, observational, clinical pilot study tested the hypothesis that measurable fluorescence signal voids occur in NSTI-affected tissues following intravenous administration and imaging of perfusion-based indocyanine green (ICG) fluorescence. This hypothesis is based on the established knowledge that NSTI is associated with local microvascular thrombosis.

Approach

Adult patients presenting to the Emergency Department of a tertiary care medical center at high risk for NSTI were prospectively enrolled and imaged with a commercial fluorescence imager. Single-frame fluorescence snapshot and first-pass perfusion kinetic parameters-ingress slope (IS), time-to-peak (TTP) intensity, and maximum fluorescence intensity (IMAX)-were quantified using a dynamic contrast-enhanced fluorescence imaging technique. Clinical variables (comorbidities, blood laboratory values), fluorescence parameters, and fluorescence signal-to-background ratios (SBRs) were compared to final infection diagnosis.

Results

Fourteen patients were enrolled and imaged (six NSTI, six cellulitis, one diabetes mellitus-associated gangrene, and one osteomyelitis). Clinical variables demonstrated no statistically significant differences between NSTI and non-NSTI patient groups (p -value ≥ 0.22 ). All NSTI cases exhibited prominent fluorescence signal voids in affected tissues, including tissue features not visible to the naked eye. All cellulitis cases exhibited a hyperemic response with increased fluorescence and no distinct signal voids. Median lesion-to-background tissue SBRs based on snapshot, IS, TTP, and IMAX parameter maps ranged from 3.2 to 9.1, 2.2 to 33.8, 1.0 to 7.5, and 1.5 to 12.7, respectively, for the NSTI patient group. All fluorescence parameters except TTP demonstrated statistically significant differences between NSTI and cellulitis patient groups (p -value < 0.05 ).

Conclusions

Real-time, accurate discrimination of NSTIs compared with non-necrotizing infections may be possible with perfusion-based ICG fluorescence imaging.

IDENTIFICATION OF POTENTIALLY MODIFIABLE FACTORS TO IMPROVE RECOGNITION AND OUTCOME OF NECROTIZING SOFT-TISSUE INFECTIONS

ABSTRACT

Background : Necrotizing soft-tissue infections (NSTIs) present a surgical emergency of increasing incidence, which is often misdiagnosed and associated with substantial mortality and morbidity. A retrospective multicenter (11 hospitals) cohort study was initiated to identify the early predictors of misdiagnosis, mortality, and morbidity (skin defect size and amputation). Methods : Patients of all ages who presented with symptoms and were admitted for acute treatment of NSTIs between January 2013 and December 2017 were included. Generalized estimating equation analysis was used to identify early predictors (available before or during the first debridement surgery), with a significance level of P < 0.05. Results : The median age of the cohort (N = 216) was 59.5 (interquartile range = 23.6) years, of which 138 patients (63.9%) were male. Necrotizing soft-tissue infections most frequently originated in the legs (31.0%) and anogenital area (30.5%). More than half of the patients (n = 114, 54.3%) were initially misdiagnosed. Thirty-day mortality was 22.9%. Amputation of an extremity was performed in 26 patients (12.5%). Misdiagnosis was more likely in patients with a higher Charlson Comorbidity Index (β = 0.20, P = 0.001), and less likely when symptoms started in the anogenital area (β = -1.20, P = 0.003). Besides the established risk factors for mortality (septic shock and age), misdiagnosis was identified as an independent predictor of 30-day mortality (β = 1.03, P = 0.01). The strongest predictors of the final skin defect size were septic shock (β = 2.88, P < 0.001) and a skin-sparing approach to debridement (β = -1.79, P = 0.002). Conclusion : Recognition of the disease is essential for the survival of patients affected by NSTI, as is adequate treatment of septic shock. The application of a skin-sparing approach to surgical debridement may decrease morbidity.

Pediatric Necrotizing Fasciitis

Necrotizing fasciitis (NF) is a rapidly progressing bacterial infection of the subcutaneous tissue that can be lifethreatening. Without prompt diagnosis and treatment, it can lead to septic shock, organ failure, and death. Due to the rarity of this disease in the pediatric population and the fact that initial symptoms are frequently nonspecific, NF in children is often misdiagnosed as cellulitis, which delays the correct treatment. Physicians must maintain a high index of suspicion and keep NF in mind because rapid surgical debridement is necessary to reduce morbidity and mortality. The purpose of this article is to better characterize what is currently known about NF within the pediatric population. In this article, the microbiology, pathophysiology, clinical manifestations, diagnosis, and treatment of pediatric NF are reviewed, and key differences between adult and pediatric NF are highlighted. Key Concepts•One must keep Necrotizing Fasciitis in mind when dealing with soft tissue infections.•A common symptom is a disproportionate level of pain for what can appear to be cellulitis.•Prompt treatment must include early, thorough, and frequently multiple debridements.•As a result of low incidences, collaborative multiple-center studies are needed to improve our level of understanding.

Initial skin necrosis presentation at emergency room was associated with fulminant clinical course and mortality in patients with Vibrio necrotizing fasciitis

Necrotizing fasciitis (NF) is a life-threatening infection. Skin necrosis is an important skin sign of NF. The purposes of this study was to investigate the initial skin conditions of Vibrio NF patients between emergency room (ER) to preoperative status, to compare the clinical and laboratory risk indicators of the skin necrosis group and non-skin necrosis group when they arrived at ER, and to evaluate whether initial cutaneous necrosis related to fulminant course and higher fatalities. From 2015 to 2019, seventy-two Vibrio NF patients with surgical confirmation were enrolled. We identified 25 patients for inclusion in the skin necrosis group and 47 patients for inclusion in the non-skin necrosis group due to the appearance of skin lesion at ER. Seven patients died, resulting in a mortality rate of 9.7%. Six patients of skin necrosis group and one patient of non-skin necrosis group died, which revealed the skin necrosis group had a significantly higher mortality rate than the non-skin necrosis group. All the patients in the skin necrosis group and 30 patients of non-skin necrosis group developed serous or hemorrhagic bullous lesions before operation (p = 0.0003). The skin necrosis group had a significantly higher incidence of APACHE score, postoperative intubation, Intensive care unit stay, septic shock, leukopenia, higher counts of banded leukocytes, elevated C-reactive protein (CRP), and lower serum albumin level. Vibrio NF patients presenting skin necrosis at ER were significantly associated with fulminant clinical courses and higher mortality. Physicians should alert the appearance of skin necrosis at ER to early suspect NF and treat aggressively by those clinical and laboratory risk indicators, such as elevated APACHE score, shock, leukopenia, higher banded leukocytes, elevated CRP, and hypoalbuminia.

Clinical and Laboratory Parameters for Differential Diagnosis of Necrotizing Faciitis and Cellulitis

ObjectiveS

Necrotizing fasciitis (NF) requires surgical intervention and has high morbidity and mortality. Furthermore, it can be confusing with some skin diseases such as cellulitis. We investigated the roles of clinical and laboratory parameters at the time of admission to the hospital in the differential diagnosis of NF and cellulitis patients.

Methods

Patients with cellulitis and NF located between the nipple level and the knee between January 2018 and January 2021 were included in our retrospective study. The fever, history, complete blood count results, blood biochemistry, C-reactive protein and procalcitonin values of the patients at the time of admission to the emergency department, length of hospital stay, mortality rates, and laboratory risk indicator for necrotizing fasciitis (LRINEC) scores were recorded and evaluated whether there was a difference in both patient groups.

Results

A total of 55 patients, including 26 patients in the NF group and 29 patients in the cellulite group, were included in the study. It was observed that patients with NF applied to the hospital statistically earlier, had higher leukocyte, platelet and neutrophil levels, had longer hospital stays and had higher mortality numbers.

Conclusion

In high leukocyte, platelet, and neutrophil levels in the case of cellulitis patients, the clinician should follow the patient's clinic course closely and keep NF in mind.

Predicting necrotising soft tissue infections in people who inject drugs: poor performance of the Laboratory Risk Indicator for Necrotising Fasciitis score and development of a novel clinical predictive nomogram in a retrospective cohort with internal validation

INTRODUCTION

Necrotising soft tissue infections (NSTI) can threaten life and limb. Early identification and urgent surgical debridement are key for improved outcomes. NSTI can be insidious. Scoring systems, like the Laboratory Risk Indicator for Necrotising Fasciitis (LRINEC), exist to aid diagnosis. People who inject drugs (PWID) are high risk for NSTI. This study aimed to assess the utility of the LRINEC in PWID with lower limb infections and develop a predictive nomogram.

METHODS

A retrospective database of all hospital admissions due to limb-related complications secondary to injecting drug use between December 2011 and December 2020 was compiled through discharge codes and a prospectively maintained Vascular Surgery database. All lower limb infections were extracted from this database, dichotomised by NSTI and non-NSTI with the LRINEC applied. Specialty management times were evaluated. Statistical analyses involved: chi-square; Analysis of "variance"; Kaplan-Meier, and receiver operating characteristic curves. Nomograms were developed to facilitate diagnosis and predict survival.

RESULTS

There were 557 admissions for 378 patients, with 124 (22.3%; 111 patients) NSTI. Time from admission to: theatre and computed tomography imaging respectively varied significantly between specialties ( P =0.001). Surgical specialties were faster than medical ( P =0.001). Vascular surgery received the most admissions and had the quickest time to theatre. During follow-up there were 79 (20.9%) deaths: 27 (24.3%) NSTI and 52 (19.5%) non-NSTI. LRINEC ≥6 had a positive predictive value of 33.3% and sensitivity of 74% for NSTI. LRINEC <6 had a negative predictive value of 90.7% and specificity of 63.2% for non-NSTI. Area under the curve was 0.697 (95% CI: 0.615-0.778). Nomogram models found age, C-reactive protein, and non-linear albumin to be significant predictors of NSTI, with age, white cell count, sodium, creatinine, C-reactive protein, and albumin being significant in predicting survival on discharge.

CONCLUSION

There was reduced performance of the LRINEC in this PWID cohort. Diagnosis may be enhanced through use of this predictive nomogram.

The Subacute Necrotizing Fasciitis: The Forgotten form of this Life-threatening Infection. A Case Report

Introduction

Necrotizing fasciitis (NF) is a life-threatening soft-tissue infection. While the fulminate form is well documented, the subacute NF is rarely reported. Failure to consider NF as a diagnosis during this indolent presentation can be detrimental to patients because the surgical aggressive debridement remains the key of the treatment.

Case Report

We report a case of a 54-year-old man who developed a subacute NF. After an initial diagnosis of cellulitis, the patient failed to show improvement with antibiotic treatment; he was referred to our institution in view to benefit of a surgical management. The patient developed progressive systemic toxic symptoms and an emergency debridement was made 10 h after his admission. Our patient achieves to show improvement with antibiotic treatment, vacuum-assisted closure therapy, hyperbaric oxygen therapy, and reconstructive surgery. Complete recovery was observed after 2 months.

Conclusion

NF is a surgical emergency. Early diagnosis is essential, it is often ambiguous and commonly misdiagnosed including the subacute form. There needs to be a high suspicion for NF even in patients presenting with cellulitis without systemic symptoms.

The performance of clinical risk scores in the diagnosis of necrotising fasciitis

OBJECTIVE

Necrotising fasciitis (NF) is a quickly progressing and potentially life-threatening infection, involving the fascia and subcutaneous tissues. The diagnosis of this disease is challenging, especially due to a lack of specific clinical signs. In order to ensure a better and quicker identification of NF patients, a laboratory risk indicator score has been developed for NF (LRINEC). A variant has widened this score by adding clinical parameters (modified LRINEC). This study shows current outcomes of NF and compares the two scoring systems.

METHODS

This study was conducted between 2011 and 2018, and included patient demographics, clinical presentations, sites of infection, comorbidities, microbiological and laboratory findings, antibiotic therapies and LRINEC as well as modified LRINEC scores. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality.

RESULTS

A cohort of 36 patients, diagnosed with NF, were included in this study. The mean hospital stay was 56 days (±38.2 days). The mortality rate in the cohort was 25%. The sensitivity of the LRINEC score was 86%. Calculation of the modified LRINEC score showed an improvement of the sensitivity to 97%. The average LRINEC score and modified LRINEC score for patients who died and who survived were equal (7.4 versus 7.9 and 10.4 versus 10.0, respectively).

CONCLUSION

The mortality rate of NF remains high. The modified LRINEC score increased the sensitivity in our cohort to 97%, and this scoring system could be supportive in the diagnosis of NF for early surgical debridement.

Prospective Validation and Comparison of Laboratory Risk Indicator for Necrotizing Fasciitis (LRINEC) and Site Other Than Lower Limb, Immunosuppression, Age, Renal Impairment, and Inflammatory Markers (SIARI) Scoring Systems for Necrotizing Fasciitis

INTRODUCTION

Necrotizing fasciitis (NF) is a rapidly progressing infection of the soft tissues associated with high morbidity and mortality and hence it is a surgical emergency. Early diagnosis and treatment are of paramount importance. LRINEC (Laboratory Risk Indicator for Necrotizing Fasciitis) and SIARI (Site other than lower limb, Immunosuppression, Age, Renal impairment, and Inflammatory markers) scoring systems have been established for early and accurate diagnosis of necrotizing fasciitis. This study compared the two scoring systems for diagnosing NF, predicting management, and elucidating the prognostic performance for re-operation and mortality.

METHODS

This prospective study was conducted in PGIMER Chandigarh, India, between February 2020 and June 2021. The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board (No. INT/IEC/2020-90). The clinical presentation, laboratory parameters, and imaging were used to classify patients into NF or severe cellulitis groups. We also calculated the LRINEC and SIARI scores. Demographic variables and mortality were recorded. The area under the receiver operating characteristic was used to express the accuracy of both scores at a cut-off LRINEC and SIARI scores of ≥6 and ≥ 4, respectively.

RESULTS

The study comprised 41 patients with NF and 11 with severe cellulitis. Informed written consent was taken from all the participants. At LRINEC score ≥6, the C-statistic for NF diagnosis was 0.839 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.682-0.995, P 0.001), which was better than SIARI score at ≥ 4, C-statistic of 0.608 (95% CI 0.43-0.787, P 0.297). Both scores accurately predicted 30-day mortality. The LRINEC score showed a C-statistic of 0.912 (95% CI 0.798-1, P 0.001). Simultaneously, the SIARI score showed 70% sensitivity and 77% specificity, with a C-statistic of 0.805 (0.62-0.99, P = 0.017).

CONCLUSIONS

LRINEC score is an effective diagnostic tool for distinguishing necrotizing fasciitis from severe cellulitis. Additional research is required to establish the SIARI score's external validity.

Bullous skin signs and laboratory surgical indicators can quickly and effectively differentiate necrotizing fasciitis from cellulitis

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this prospective study was to investigate the different microorganisms associated with mortality, to evaluate the bullous skin sign, and to identify the positive predictive factors for differentiating necrotizing fasciitis (NF) from cellulitis on initial onset at the emergency department.

METHODS

This prospective study was conducted in 145 consecutive patients with NF and 159 patients with cellulitis. Age, sex, comorbidities, infection site, microbiological results, condition of skin lesions, laboratory findings, vital signs, and clinical outcomes were compared between the two groups at the time of admission to the emergency room.

RESULTS

A total of 15 patients in the NF group and two patients in the cellulitis group died, resulting in a mortality rate of 10.3% and 1.3%, respectively. The NF group had a significantly higher incidence of white blood cell counts, band form neutrophil, and C-reactive protein than the patients in the cellulitis group. Hemorrhagic bullae presentation appeared to have significantly associated with NF and death.

CONCLUSION

The following diagnostic indicators can be effectively used to differentiate NF from cellulitis at the initial onset: presence of hemorrhagic bullae, white blood cell counts >11,000 cells/mm³, band forms >0%, C-reactive protein >100 mg/l, and systolic blood pressure ≤90 mm Hg at the time of consultation.

Measures of Admission Immunocoagulopathy as an Indicator for In-Hospital Mortality in Patients with Necrotizing Fasciitis: A Retrospective Study

Necrotizing fasciitis is a rapidly progressive infection with a high mortality rate. Pathogens evade the host containment and bactericidal mechanisms by hijacking the coagulation and inflammation signaling pathways, leading to their rapid dissemination, thrombosis, organ dysfunction, and death. This study examines the hypothesis that measures of immunocoagulopathy upon admission could aid in the identification of patients with necrotizing fasciitis at high risk for in-hospital mortality.

Methods

Demographic data, infection characteristics, and laboratory values from 389 confirmed necrotizing fasciitis cases from a single institution were analyzed. A multivariable logistic regression model was built on admission immunocoagulopathy measures (absolute neutrophil, absolute lymphocyte, and platelet counts) and patient age to predict in-hospital mortality.

Results

The overall in-hospital mortality rate was 19.8% for the 389 cases and 14.6% for the 261 cases with complete measures of immunocoagulopathy on admission. A multivariable logistic regression model indicated that platelet count was the most important predictor of mortality, followed by age and absolute neutrophil count. Greater age, higher neutrophil count, and lower platelet count led to significantly higher risk of mortality. The model discriminated well between survivors and non-survivors, with an overfitting-corrected C-index of 0.806.

Conclusions

This study determined that measures of immunocoagulopathy and patient age at admission effectively prognosticated the in-hospital mortality risk of patients with necrotizing fasciitis. Given the accessibility of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and platelet count measurements determined from a simple complete blood-cell count with differential, future prospective studies examining the utility of these measures are warranted.

Level of Evidence

Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Necrotizing Soft Tissue Infection Post VASER-Assisted Liposuction and Lipofilling: A Case Report

Liposuction is a very common aesthetic procedure nowadays. The complication rate is very minimal, and it increases relatively when combined with other procedures. Infection is an expected complication in liposuction and its risk is below 1% in isolated procedures. Although the risk is very low, it might lead to fatal consequences. In this manuscript, the authors present a previously healthy female who presented to the authors' emergency department post-vibration amplification of sound energy at resonance (VASER)-assisted liposuction and lipofilling done in a private center. Her signs and symptoms started after the procedure and she visited the private center multiple times; however, no significant improvement was felt. Upon her presentation to the authors' facility, immediate resuscitation was initiated, and she was admitted for further investigations and management. Despite all resuscitation efforts and interventions, the patient's condition kept deteriorating. She was admitted to the surgical intensive care unit and taken to the operating theater twice with no observed significant improvement. The patient developed septic shock, a multiorgan failure state, followed by cardiac arrest. All resuscitation measures were taken, but the patient could not be revived and was declared dead. Early recognition of signs and symptoms of infection could be lifesaving. Aggressive resuscitation and surgical interventions (extensive debridement and antibiotics) might be necessary to produce successful outcomes.

Level of Evidence 5

Diagnostic and prognostic value of the Laboratory Risk Indicator for Necrotising Fasciitis (LRINEC) based on an 18 years' experience

BACKGROUND

Necrotising fasciitis (NF) represents a rare but often life-threatening condition. Early diagnosis and surgical treatment are of vital importance. The LRINEC score was developed to distinguish necrotising fasciitis from other soft tissue infections (STI) at initial evaluation using six laboratory values. In this retrospective study, we attempted to determine the diagnostic and prognostic value of the LRINEC score.

METHODS

A total of 125 patients, hospitalised in our clinic between 2003 and 2021 with a histologically confirmed diagnosis of necrotising fasciitis (NF group) and 319 patients with surgically treated soft tissue infections (STI group) were included in this study. Individual LRINEC scores were calculated and analysed retrospectively.

RESULTS

The sensitivity of the LRINEC score at the cut-off point of ≥ 6 was 59%, whereas the specificity was 82%. The positive and negative predictive values were 57% and 84%, respectively. The mean LRINEC score was significantly higher in the NF group than in the STI group (6.0 compared to 2.4, respectively). All clinical outcome parameters such as amputation and mortality rates (15% vs 1%) were found to be significantly higher in the NF group (p<0.001). Within the NF group, there was no statistically significant association between the LRINEC score and clinical outcomes except for the necessary number of operations.

CONCLUSION

In isolation, we found the LRINEC score not to be a reliable enough diagnostic tool for the differentiation between NF and other soft tissue infections, because of its low sensitivity. Although we cannot recommend it as a prognostic tool either, we do believe it can be a useful adjunct to the clinical suspicion of NF.

Bilateral non-contiguous necrotizing fasciitis of the lower extremities

Necrotizing fasciitis (NF) is an uncommon soft tissue infection. Multifocal-extremity NF is a rarity with high mortality rates. Herein we report a case of bilateral non-contiguous NF of the lower extremities due to Escherichia coli with a fatal outcome, stressing the necessity of rapid and aggressive intervention in suspected cases.

Time Is Fascia: Laboratory and Anamnestic Risk Indicators for Necrotizing Fasciitis

Background: Necrotizing fasciitis is a potentially fatal soft tissue infection in which the timing of surgical intervention significantly affects clinical outcome. The Laboratory Risk Indicator for Necrotizing Fasciitis (LRINEC) score, the Site other than the lower limb, Immunosuppression, Age <60 years, Renal impairment (creatinine >141), and Inflammatory markers (CRP ≥150, WCC >25) (SIARI) score, and procalcitonin levels are intended to aid in the decision-making process to differentiate between necrotizing fasciitis and soft tissue infections. Methods: A retrospective analysis of cases of necrotizing fasciitis and soft tissue infections treated at Klinikum Nürnberg was performed. The two scores as well as procalcitonin levels were tested for their diagnostic value and a new score, the Laboratory and Anamnestic Risk Indicator for Necrotizing Fasciitis (LARINF), was created based on the results. Results: Procalcitonin, LRINEC score, and SIARI score showed insufficient discriminatory ability in our study. The newly created LARINF score combined laboratory parameters of the LRINEC score (hemoglobin and C-reactive protein) with procalcitonin and three comorbidities, resulting in a sensitivity of 84% and a specificity of 75% and the highest area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve of 0.83. Conclusions: The LARINF score is a novel decision-supporting tool. The decision, in which cases surgical exploration should be initiated, remains a clinical one. However, the score seems to provide an improved basis for identifying a rare clinical picture.

Morbidity and Mortality of Necrotizing Fasciitis and Their Prognostic Factors in Children

BACKGROUND

This is a prospective study of the clinico-etiologic profile and factors affecting outcomes in 40 children managed for necrotizing fasciitis (NF).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Demographic details, clinical characteristics, and laboratory parameters were recorded, and the Laboratory Risk Indicator for Necrotizing Fasciitis (LRINEC) score was calculated. Primary outcome (survival vs. nonsurvival) was noted, and prognostic factors were identified.

RESULTS

Initiating factors included boils (45%), i.v. cannula extravasations (22.5%), and blunt trauma (17.5%). Lesion (s) were predominantly on the lower limbs (35%) and trunk (25%). Twenty-two patients (55%) had <5% body surface area (BSA) involved. Severely deranged clinical and laboratory parameters were common. Ultrasound localized fluid collections. Pus cultures showed methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (52.5%), methicillin-sensitive S. aureus [27.5%], and polymicrobial growth (20%). Blood culture was positive in 24 patients (60%). Most isolates were sensitive to clindamycin and amoxy-clavulanate. Prognostic factors for mortality (n = 6; 15%) included categorization as "Sick," BSA involvement >10%, thrombocytopenia, raised serum creatinine, late debridement, and polymicrobial blood culture isolates. All six nonsurvivors had a LRINEC score of ≥8 and positive blood cultures. Six patients (20.7%) developed unsightly scars and 5 (17.24%) contractures across joints.

CONCLUSIONS

Pediatric NF has significant morbidity and mortality. Patients with adverse prognostic factors can benefit from early referral to a facility with a critical care unit. Adequate wound management is essential to minimize residual deformity.

Outcome of necrotizing fasciitis and Fournier's gangrene with and without hyperbaric oxygen therapy: a retrospective analysis over 10 years

BACKGROUND

Necrotizing soft tissue infections (NSTI) require immediate radical debridement, broad-spectrum antibiotics and intensive care. Hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) may be performed adjunctively, but unequivocal evidence for its benefits is still lacking.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective single-center study including 192 patients with necrotizing fasciitis or Fournier's gangrene to assess in-hospital mortality and outcome dependent on patient, disease and treatment characteristics with or without HBOT.

RESULTS

The in-hospital mortality rate was 27.6%. Factors associated with increased mortality according to multivariate analysis were higher age, affection of multiple or problem localizations (odds ratio (OR) = 2.88, P = 0.003), ineligibility for HBOT despite clinical indication (OR = 8.59, P = 0.005), pathogens in blood cultures (OR = 3.36, P = 0.002), complications (OR = 10.35, P < 0.001) and sepsis/organ dysfunction (OR = 19.58, P < 0.001). Factors associated with better survival included vacuum-assisted wound closure (OR = 0.17, P < 0.001), larger number of debridements (OR = 0.83, P < 0.001) and defect closure with mesh graft (OR = 0.06, P < 0.001) or flap (OR = 0.09, P = 0.024). When participants were stratified into subgroups without requirement of HBOT (n = 98), treated with HBOT (n = 83) and ineligible for HBOT due to contraindications (n = 11), the first two groups had similar survival rates (75.5% vs. 73.5%) and comparable outcome, although patients with HBOT suffered from more severe NSTI, reflected by more frequent affection of multiple localizations (P < 0.001), sepsis at admission (P < 0.001) and intensive care treatment (P < 0.001), more debridements (P < 0.001) and a larger number of antibiotics (P = 0.001). In the subgroup ineligible for HBOT, survival was significantly worse (36.4%, P = 0.022).

CONCLUSION

These results point to a benefit from HBOT for treatment of NSTI in critically ill patients.

Ciprofloxacin-loaded dissolving polymeric microneedles as a potential therapeutic for the treatment of S. aureus skin infections

Microneedles have been widely studied for many topical and transdermal therapeutics due to their ability to painlessly puncture the skin, thereby bypassing the stratum corneum, the main skin barrier. In this study, ciprofloxacin (CIP) was loaded into dissolving polymeric microneedles prepared by a two-layer centrifugation method as a potential treatment of skin infections such as cellulitis. The polymers used were polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) and polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP). Two formulations were investigated, namely CIP_MN1, composed of 10 mg ciprofloxacin incorporated into a polymer matrix of PVA and PVP with a weight ratio of (9:1), and CIP_MN2, composed of 10 mg ciprofloxacin incorporated into PVA polymer. CIP_MN1 and CIP_MN2 showed a mean microneedle height of 188 and 179 µm, respectively. Since Parafilm has been proven as a model to examine the perforation of microneedles in skin, it was used to evaluate the ability of microneedles to perforate the skin. CIP_MN1 showed almost complete perforation of Parafilm, 190 pores, compared to CIP_MN2 which created only 85 pores in Parafilm, and therefore CIP_MN1 was used for subsequent studies. Examining CIP_MN1 on agarose gel as an in vitro model of human skin showed that the formula was able to fully perforate the agarose gel. Moreover, this formula showed significantly greater antimicrobial activity (p < 0.0001) compared to a free gel of ciprofloxacin against Staphylococcus aureus in an agarose gel-based model. This was evidenced by a zone of inhibition of 29 mm for the microneedle formulation of ciprofloxacin (CIP_MN1) compared to 2 mm for the free gel of ciprofloxacin. Furthermore, the CIP_MN1 showed complete dissolution in human skin after 60 min from application. Finally, the skin deposition of CIP_MN1 was investigated in ex vivo excised human skin. CIP_MN1 showed significantly more deposition of ciprofloxacin in deeper skin layers compared to the free gel of ciprofloxacin, and the released ciprofloxacin from the microneedles tends to migrate to deeper layers with time. Collectively, these results suggest that CIP_MN1 can be a potential delivery system for the treatment of S. aureus skin infections.

Cellulitis: A Review of Current Practice Guidelines and Differentiation from Pseudocellulitis

Cellulitis, an infection involving the deep dermis and subcutaneous tissue, is the most common reason for skin-related hospitalization and is seen by clinicians across various disciplines in the inpatient, outpatient, and emergency room settings, but it can present as a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge. Cellulitis is a clinical diagnosis based on the history of present illness and physical examination and lacks a gold standard for diagnosis. Clinical presentation with acute onset of redness, warmth, swelling, and tenderness and pain is typical. However, cellulitis can be difficult to diagnose due to a number of infectious and non-infectious clinical mimickers such as venous stasis dermatitis, contact dermatitis, eczema, lymphedema, and erythema migrans. Microbiological diagnosis is often unobtainable due to poor sensitivity of culture specimens. The majority of non-purulent, uncomplicated cases of cellulitis are caused by β-hemolytic streptococci or methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus, and appropriate targeted coverage of this pathogen with oral antibiotics such as penicillin, amoxicillin, and cephalexin is sufficient. Even with rising rates of community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, coverage for non-purulent cellulitis is generally not recommended.

Differentiating Upper Extremity Necrotizing Soft Tissue Infection From Serious Cellulitis and Abscess

Introduction

Necrotizing soft tissue infection (NSTI) of the upper extremity (UE) is a rapidly progressing infection that requires early diagnosis and emergent treatment to decrease risks of loss of limb or life. Clinical presentation, particularly of early NSTI, can appear similar to serious cellulitis or abscess. The purpose of this study was to identify factors that are associated with NSTI rather than serious cellulitis and abscess to differentiate patients with similar clinical presentations.

Methods

This study uses a retrospective cohort design that compares patients ultimately diagnosed with UE NSTI versus those diagnosed with UE serious cellulitis or abscess. Cohorts were matched using the Laboratory Risk Indicators for Necrotizing Fasciitis (LRINEC) score in the setting of UE soft tissue infection. Laboratory values, vital signs, subjective symptoms, and social factors including substance abuse and domiciled status were recorded. Continuous variables were compared using the Mann-Whitney U test, whereas categorical variables were compared using the chi-squared test or the Fisher exact test (for expected values less than 5). A binary logistic regression for continuous and categorical variables was also performed. Significance was set at p<0.05. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed.

Results

Multivariate statistical analysis and clinical interpretation of data identified four factors more associated with a diagnosis of NSTI than serious cellulitis or abscess: elevated lactate on hospital presentation, a patient-reported history of fever, male gender, and homelessness. 

Conclusions

In patients with upper extremity infections, the clinical presentation of NSTI and serious cellulitis or abscess may appear similar. In this retrospective cohort of patients matched with LRINEC scores, elevated lactate, subjective fever, male gender, and homelessness were significantly associated with NSTI rather than serious cellulitis or abscess. 

Differentiating Lower Extremity Necrotizing Soft Tissue Infection from Severe Cellulitis by Laboratory Parameters and Relevant History Points

Background

Necrotizing soft tissue infection (NSTI) of the lower extremity (LE) is a rapidly progressing infection that requires early diagnosis and prompt treatment to decrease risks of loss of limb or life. Clinical presentation, particularly of early NSTI, can appear similar to severe cellulitis. The purpose of this study is to identify factors that are associated with NSTI rather than severe cellulitis to differentiate patients with similar clinical presentation.

Methods

This retrospective cohort design study compares patients finally diagnosed with LE NSTI versus those diagnosed with severe cellulitis. Cohorts were matched using the modified Laboratory Risk Indicator for Necrotizing Fasciitis (m-LRINEC) score in the setting of LE soft tissue infection. Laboratory values, vital signs, subjective symptoms, and social factors including substance abuse were recorded. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed.

Results

Multivariate statistical analysis and clinical interpretation of data identified four factors more associated with a diagnosis of NSTI than severe cellulitis: elevated lactate, a patient-reported history of fever, male gender, and intravenous substance user.

Conclusion

In patients with lower extremity infections, the clinical presentation of NSTI and severe cellulitis may appear similar. In this retrospective cohort of patients matched with m-LRINEC scores, elevated lactate, subjective fever, male gender, and intravenous substance abuser were significantly associated with NSTI rather than severe cellulitis. Further studies of these factors in the clinical setting can help tailor the differential diagnosis in the care of patients with severe lower extremity infections. Matched with m-LRINEC scores, elevated lactate, subjective fever, male gender, and intravenous substance abuser were significantly associated with NSTI rather than severe cellulitis. Further studies of these factors in the clinical setting can help tailor the differential diagnosis in the care of patients with severe lower extremity infections.

Lactate based Scoring System in the diagnosis of necrotizing fasciitis

INTRODUCTION

Necrotizing fasciitis (NF) is a rare and quickly progressing infection and leads to 100% mortality if untreated. Quick diagnosis and an early and radical surgical treatment are essential for stopping bacterial progression. Unfortunately, the absence of clear clinical signs makes the diagnosis often challenging. Therefore, we searched for easy determinable predictive laboratory markers for NF. This is the first study which includes lactate values in a new score.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A retrospective analysis of patients with NF (n = 44) and patients with erysipelas (n = 150) was performed. Lactate values, patients` demographics, clinical presentations, site of infection, comorbidities, microbiological and laboratory findings, antibiotic therapies and LRINEC and modified LRINEC Scores were analyzed. Logistic regression analysis was used to derive adjusted weights, and final simple point score was assessed with a ROC curve analysis.

RESULTS

Patients with NF had a mean age of 57 years, patients with erysipelas 65 years. The median hospital length of stay was 8 and 49 days in patients with erysipelas and NF, respectively. While only one patient (0.7 %) in the group of erysipelas died, the mortality rate of patients with NF was 9/44 (20.5 %). The lactate values were statistically significant higher in the NF group 4.1 vs. 2.0 mmol/l (p < 0.001). The new created CologNe-FaDe-Score shows the highest AUC-value with 0.907.

CONCLUSION

With the help of lactate values the CologNe-FaDe-Score consists of easily practicable and highly available parameters, which could sensitize diagnosis.

[Necrotizing Fasciitis]

Necrotizing fasciitis (NF) is a soft tissue infection spreading along the fasciae to the surrounding subcutaneous fat, overlying skin and finally musculature, that may rapidly lead to septic shock and death. In order to avoid a massive systemic spread of the infective process, an immediate and extensive radical debridement of necrotic tissues is mandatory complemented by a broad spectrum intravenous antibiotic therapy. Nevertheless, mortality is persistently high at 20-40 %. Because of the lack of specific clinical features in the initial stage of the disease, it is often underestimated or confused with cellulitis or abscess. Hence, early diagnosis is missed or delayed in 85 %-100 % of cases with the passage of valuable time.The aim of this review is to give an overview of the clinical and laboratory elements to be considered for diagnosis as well as the essential therapeutic patterns.

A Nearly Missed Pancoast Tumour From Isolated Persistent Leg Pain

Pancoast tumours (PTs) are apical tumours of the lung that manifest with a variety of symptoms. Herein, we describe a rare case of a 56-year-old female with a one-month history of persistent left leg pain despite advanced imaging, such as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and orthopaedic input, which was focused onto her left knee being the prime cause of her pain. Her non-resolving symptoms prompted her to attend the Emergency Department. A careful clinical examination pointed towards the left proximal tibia being the most probable cause. Basic radiographic imaging (x-ray) of the left tibia revealed a lytic lesion which was later confirmed to be metastatic disease arising from a Pancoast tumour (PT) following further advanced imaging and diagnostics. This case highlights a unique presentation of a Pancoast tumour that, to our knowledge, has never been reported before in the medical literature. A high index of suspicion, careful examination, and investigation were essential to reach this diagnosis.

Utility of Inflammatory Markers in Hospitalized Children With Skin Erythema

BACKGROUND

There is overlap in the clinical presentations of superficial skin infections (eg, cellulitis) and deeper infections (eg, osteomyelitis). Inflammatory markers are frequently obtained in hospitalized patients with cellulitis. However, it is unknown whether inflammatory markers discriminate between superficial and deeper infections.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective review of children hospitalized with erythema on the skin and diagnoses of cellulitis, bursitis, myositis, osteomyelitis, and/or tenosynovitis. Patients were grouped into superficial infection (cellulitis and bursitis) and deeper infection (myositis, tenosynovitis, osteomyelitis). We compared C-reactive protein (CRP) and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) values between the two groups and constructed receiver operating characteristic curves to determine optimal cutoff values.

RESULTS

Among 168 children hospitalized with skin erythema, 122 patients had superficial and 46 patients had deeper infections. Mean CRP and ESR were significantly higher in patients with deeper infections (CRP: 8.3 [±9.6] mg/dL versus 2.8 [±3.5] mg/dL; P < .001; ESR: 48.3 [±28.6] mm/h versus 21.8 [±16.0] mm/h; P < .001). Neither WBC nor fever was significantly different between groups. CRP ≥2 mg/dL and ESR ≥30 mm/h were associated with deeper infections (CRP: odds ratio: 4.77; 95% confidence interval: 2.24-10.15; ESR: odds ratio: 7.93; 95% confidence interval: 3.46-17.67). When CRP and ESR were below these cutoffs, the negative predictive value was 89%.

CONCLUSIONS

Among patients presenting with skin erythema, CRP ≥2 mg/dL and ESR ≥30 mm/hr were significantly associated with deeper infection, whereas values below these cutoffs were reassuring against deeper infection. Future study of inflammatory markers in skin and soft tissue infections may help develop tailored testing strategies.

[Saddle Bruise From Mountainbiking - Just a Trifle?]

Saddle Bruise From Mountainbiking - Just a Trifle? Abstract. Using the term of behavioral psychology, this review with case report illustrates how a necrotisizing fasciitis following a blunt soft tissue trauma got misinterpreted as pulmonary embolism. In addition to the most important red flags we describe the typical course of disease and provide relevant tools to differentiate upatient between minor ailments and this life-threatening disease on first presentation of the patient.

Necrotizing Soft-Tissue Infections: Clinical Features and Diagnostic Aspects

The term necrotizing soft-tissue infection (NSTI) encompasses a heterogenous group of patients with necrotizing infections, involving any body part. NSTI is diagnosed by surgical exploration, where necrosis of the subcutaneous tissue and/or muscle tissue, undermining of the skin, thrombosis of the superficial veins, and deliquescent tissue can be seen. Patients can present with vague symptoms, and approximately half of patients experience severe pain. The clinical presentation and microbiological etiology vary according to affected body site, with NSTI located to the extremities being dominated by monomicrobial group A streptococcal infections, and NSTI located to the anogenital area dominated by polymicrobial infections. No set of diagnostic criteria exists, and suspicion of the diagnosis should come from careful clinical examination and signs of local or systemic severity. Laboratory blood values show no distinct pattern but resemble those of sepsis. Imaging can aid the diagnostic process but must not delay surgical intervention.

Spontaneous Necrotizing Fasciitis

Necrotizing soft tissue infections typically begin with direct inoculation of bacteria into the subcutaneous tissues. Here, we present a case with no such exposure, but with severe necrotizing fasciitis. We present a middle-aged man presented to the emergency department for a presumed allergic reaction after having initially sought care twice at an urgent care facility. The patient had swelling, but no tenderness of his right lateral chest and flank. Subsequent imaging showed extensive fluid in the fascial planes of the right chest wall requiring surgical debridement. Necrotizing fasciitis that is not treated with surgical debridement carries a mortality rate approaching 100%. This case highlights a potential atypical presentation as well as highlights the fact that the Laboratory Risk Indicator for Necrotizing Fasciitis (LRINEC) score lacks sensitivity to rule out a necrotizing soft tissue infection, requiring surgical debridement for diagnosis.

Diagnostic value of laboratory parameters for the discrimination between erysipelas and limited cellulitis

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Erysipelas, caused by beta-hemolytic streptococci, and limited cellulitis, frequently caused by Staphylococcus aureus or other bacteria, are skin and soft tissue infections characterized by typical clinical signs. However, despite the therapeutical relevance they are often not differentiated (e.g in clinical trials). Erysipelas are efficiently treated with penicillin, while limited cellulitis is treated with more wide-spectrum antibiotics. This study investigates whether parameters such as CRP, blood counts or novel parameters like immature granulocytes could serve as biomarkers to distinguish between these entities.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

For this retrospective analysis 163 patients were included. We compared laboratory markers in patients with erysipelas (n = 68) to those with limited cellulitis (n = 41) of the leg. Both erysipelas and limited cellulitis were defined clinically, with an additional aspect for erysipelas being a prompt response to penicillin.

RESULTS

Erysipelas were characterized by higher levels of inflammation. CRP and leukocyte counts are the best parameters to discriminate between both infections. A CRP value ≥ 3.27 mg/dl indicated the diagnosis of erysipelas with 75 % sensitivity and 73.2 % specificity.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results support the thesis that erysipelas and limited cellulitis are distinct infections as defined in the German guidelines and that an assessment of CRP and leukocytes is useful for differential diagnosis.

Utility of Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Differentiating Necrotizing Fasciitis from Severe Cellulitis: A Magnetic Resonance Indicator for Necrotizing Fasciitis (MRINEC) Algorithm

We developed a new magnetic resonance indicator for necrotizing fasciitis (MRINEC) algorithm for differentiating necrotizing fasciitis (NF) from severe cellulitis (SC). All adults with suspected NF between 2010 and 2018 in a tertiary hospital in South Korea were enrolled. Sixty-one patients were diagnosed with NF and 28 with SC. Among them, 34 with NF and 15 with SC underwent magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The MRINEC algorithm, a two-step decision tree including T2 hyperintensity of intermuscular deep fascia and diffuse T2 hyperintensity of deep peripheral fascia, diagnosed NF with 94% sensitivity (95% confidence interval (CI), 80–99%) and 60% specificity (95% CI, 32–84%). The algorithm accurately diagnosed all 15 NF patients with a high (≥8) laboratory risk indicator for necrotizing fasciitis (LRINEC) score. Among the five patients with an intermediate (6–7) LRINEC score, sensitivity and specificity were 100% (95% CI, 78–100%) and 0% (95% CI, 0–84%), respectively. Finally, among the 29 patients with a low (≤5) LRINEC score, the algorithm had a sensitivity and specificity of 88% (95% CI, 62–98%) and 69% (95% CI, 39–91%), respectively. The MRINEC algorithm may be a useful adjuvant method for diagnosing NF, especially when NF is suspected in patients with a low LRINEC score.

The EGS grading scale for skin and soft-tissue infections is predictive of poor outcomes: a multicenter validation study

INTRODUCTION

Over the last 5 years, the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma has developed grading scales for emergency general surgery (EGS) diseases. In a previous validation study using diverticulitis, the grading scales were predictive of complications and length of stay. As EGS encompasses diverse diseases, the purpose of this study was to validate the grading scale concept against a different disease process with a higher associated mortality. We hypothesized that the grading scale would be predictive of complications, length of stay, and mortality in skin and soft-tissue infections (STIs).

METHODS

This multi-institutional trial encompassed 12 centers. Data collected included demographic variables, disease characteristics, and outcomes such as mortality, overall complications, and hospital and ICU length of stay. The EGS scale for STI was used to grade each infection and two surgeons graded each case to evaluate inter-rater reliability.

RESULTS

1170 patients were included in this study. Inter-rater reliability was moderate (kappa coefficient 0.472-0.642, with 64-76% agreement). Higher grades (IV and V) corresponded to significantly higher Laboratory Risk Indicator for Necrotizing Fasciitis scores when compared with lower EGS grades. Patients with grade IV and V STI had significantly increased odds of all complications, as well as ICU and overall length of stay. These associations remained significant in logistic regression controlling for age, gender, comorbidities, mental status, and hospital-level volume. Grade V disease was significantly associated with mortality as well.

CONCLUSION

This validation effort demonstrates that grade IV and V STI are significantly predictive of complications, hospital length of stay, and mortality. Though predictive ability does not improve linearly with STI grade, this is consistent with the clinical disease process in which lower grades represent cellulitis and abscess and higher grades are invasive infections. This second validation study confirms the EGS grading scale as predictive, and easily used, in disparate disease processes.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic/Epidemiologic retrospective multicenter trial, level III.

Prospective Validation of the Laboratory Risk Indicator for Necrotizing Fasciitis (LRINEC) Score for Necrotizing Fasciitis of the Extremities

OBJECTIVES

The Laboratory Risk Indicator for Necrotizing Fasciitis score was developed as a clinical decision tool for distinguishing necrotizing fasciitis from other soft tissue infections. We prospectively evaluated the performance of the Laboratory Risk Indicator for Necrotizing Fasciitis score for the diagnosis of patients with necrotizing fasciitis in the extremities.

METHODS

We conducted a prospective and observational cohort study of emergency department patients with necrotizing fasciitis or severe cellulitis in the extremities between April 2015 and December 2016. The Laboratory Risk Indicator for Necrotizing Fasciitis score was calculated for every enrolled patient. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of cut-off scores of 6 and 8 were evaluated. The accuracy of the Laboratory Risk Indicator for Necrotizing Fasciitis score was expressed as the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve.

RESULTS

A total of 106 patients with necrotizing fasciitis and 825 patients with cellulitis were included. With an Laboratory Risk Indicator for Necrotizing Fasciitis cut-off score ≥6, the sensitivity was 43% (95% confidence interval 34% to 53%), specificity was 83% (95% confidence interval 80% to 86%), positive predictive value was 25% (95% confidence interval 20% to 30%), and negative predictive value was 92% (95% confidence interval 91% to 93%); with an Laboratory Risk Indicator for Necrotizing Fasciitis cut-off score ≥8, the sensitivity was 27% (95% confidence interval 19% to 37%), specificity was 93% (95% confidence interval 91% to 94%), positive predictive value was 33% (95% confidence interval 25% to 42%), and negative predictive value was 91% (95% confidence interval 90% to 92%). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for accuracy of the Laboratory Risk Indicator for Necrotizing Fasciitis score was 0.696 (95% CI 0.640 to 0.751).

CONCLUSION

The Laboratory Risk Indicator for Necrotizing Fasciitis score may not be an accurate tool for necrotizing fasciitis risk stratification and differentiation between severe cellulitis and necrotizing fasciitis in the emergency department setting based on our study.

A systematic review showing the lack of diagnostic criteria and tools developed for lower-limb cellulitis

BACKGROUND

Cellulitis can be a difficult diagnosis to make. Furthermore, 31% of patients admitted from the emergency department with suspected lower-limb cellulitis have been misdiagnosed, with incorrect treatment potentially resulting in avoidable hospital admission and the prescription of unnecessary antibiotics.

OBJECTIVES

We sought to identify diagnostic criteria or tools that have been developed for lower-limb cellulitis.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic review using Ovid MEDLINE and Embase databases in May 2018, with the aim of describing diagnostic criteria and tools developed for lower-limb cellulitis, and we assessed the quality of the studies identified using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 tool. We included all types of study that described diagnostic criteria or tools.

RESULTS

Eight observational studies were included. Five studies examined biochemical markers, two studies assessed imaging and one study developed a diagnostic decision model. All eight studies were considered to have a high risk for bias in at least one domain. The quantity and quality of available data was low and results could not be pooled owing to the heterogeneity of the findings.

CONCLUSIONS

There is a lack of high-quality publications describing criteria or tools for diagnosing lower-limb cellulitis. Future studies using prospective designs, validated in both primary and secondary care settings, are needed. What's already known about this topic? Diagnosing lower-limb cellulitis on first presentation is challenging. Approximately one in three patients admitted from the emergency department with suspected lower-limb cellulitis do not have cellulitis and are given another diagnosis on discharge. Consequently, this results in potentially avoidable hospital admissions and the prescription of unnecessary antibiotics. There are no diagnostic criteria available for lower-limb cellulitis in the U.K. What does this study add? This systematic review has identified a key research gap in the diagnosis of lower-limb cellulitis. There is a current lack of robustly developed and validated diagnostic criteria or tools for use in clinical practice.

Necrotizing Soft Tissue Infection: Diagnostic Accuracy of Physical Examination, Imaging, and LRINEC Score: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVE

We sought to summarize accuracy of physical examination, imaging, and Laboratory Risk Indicator for Necrotizing Fasciitis (LRINEC) score in diagnosis of necrotizing soft tissue infection (NSTI) in adults with a soft tissue infection clinically concerning for NSTI.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

NSTI is a life-threatening diagnosis. Delay to diagnosis and surgical management is associated with increased mortality.

METHODS

We searched 6 databases from inception through November 2017. We included English-language studies reporting diagnostic accuracy of testing or LRINEC Score. Outcome was NSTI confirmed by surgery or histopathology. Two reviewers screened all citations and extracted data independently. Summary measures were obtained from the Hierarchical Summary Receiver Operating Characteristic model.

RESULTS

From 2,290 citations, we included 23 studies (n = 5982). Of physical examination signs, pooled sensitivity and specificity for fever was 46.0% and 77.0% respectively, for hemorrhagic bullae 25.2% and 95.8%, and for hypotension 21.0% and 97.7%. Computed tomography (CT) had sensitivity of 88.5% and specificity of 93.3%, while plain radiography had sensitivity of 48.9% and specificity of 94.0%. Finally, LRINEC ≥ 6 had sensitivity of 68.2% and specificity of 84.8%, while LRINEC ≥ 8 had sensitivity of 40.8% and specificity of 94.9%.

CONCLUSIONS

Absence of any 1 physical examination feature (eg, fever or hypotension) is not sufficient to rule-out NSTI. CT is superior to plain radiography. LRINEC had poor sensitivity, and should not be used to rule-out NSTI. Given the poor sensitivity of these tests, a high clinical suspicion warrants early surgical consultation for definitive diagnosis and management.

Near-Infrared Light-Sensitive Nano Neuro-Immune Blocker Capsule Relieves Pain and Enhances the Innate Immune Response for Necrotizing Infection

Sensory neurons promote profound suppressive effects on neutrophils during Streptococcus pyogenes infection and contribute to the pathogenesis of necrotizing infection ("flesh-eating disease"). Thus, the development of new antibacterial agents for necrotizing infection is promising because of the clear streptococcal neuro-immune communication. Herein, based on the immune escape membrane exterior and competitive membrane functions of the glioma cell membrane, a novel nano neuro-immune blocker capsule was designed to prevent neuronal activation and improve neutrophil immune responses for necrotizing infection. These nano neuro-immune blockers could neutralize streptolysin S, suppress neuron pain conduction and calcitonin gene-related peptide release, and recruit neutrophils to the infection site, providing a strong therapeutic effect against necrotizing infection. Furthermore, nano neuro-immune blockers could serve as an effective inflammatory regulator and antibacterial agent via photothermal effects under near-infrared irradiation. In the Streptococcus pyogenes-induced necrotizing fasciitis mouse model, nano neuro-immune blockers showed significant therapeutic efficacy by ameliorating sensitivity to pain and promoting the antibacterial effect of neutrophils.

A Systematic Review of the Laboratory Risk Indicator for Necrotizing Fasciitis Score and Its Utility in Orthopedics for Diagnosing Necrotizing Fasciitis in Adults

Given its association with trauma and surgery, necrotizing fasciitis is a disease orthopedists are likely to encounter. The laboratory risk indicator for necrotizing fasciitis score is an adjunct diagnostic test designed to help diagnose early necrotizing fasciitis infections, but studies evaluating the scoring system have reported conflicting results. The purpose of this systematic review was to provide clarity on the laboratory risk indicator for necrotizing fasciitis score's capabilities and when it is best used. [Orthopedics. 2019; 42(3):e288-e294.].