Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Different Antiplatelet Agents for Prevention of Major Cardiovascular Events and Leg Amputations in Patients with Peripheral Arterial Disease: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis

Antithrombotic treatment following revascularization for chronic limb-threatening ischaemia: a scientific statement of the European Society of Cardiology Working Group on Aorta and Peripheral Vascular Diseases and the European Society of Cardiology Working Group on Cardiovascular Pharmacotherapy

Chronic limb-threatening ischaemia (CLTI) is defined as ischaemic rest pain, or non-healing ulceration, requiring endovascular or surgical lower limb revascularization (LLR). Lower limb revascularization in CLTI entails a high risk of major adverse limb events (MALE) and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). This scientific statement addresses this risk based on a systematic review. A structured literature search was performed, and articles were independently evaluated by two investigators. In total, 1678 articles were identified, of which 34 were included in the final analysis. Only three randomized controlled trials (RCTs) addressed antithrombotic therapy in CLTI following LLR. None of these demonstrated superiority of any antithrombotic regimen over the other. Eight RCTs investigated antithrombotic therapy following LLR in populations with peripheral arterial disease including CLTI subgroups and suggest a benefit of dual antiplatelet therapy on limb events. One large RCT demonstrated that dual pathway inhibition with aspirin and vascular-dose rivaroxaban reduced the risk of MALE, MACE, and unplanned target limb revascularization. Data from 22 observational studies suggest a benefit of dual antiplatelet therapy on overall survival and amputation-free survival after LLR as compared with single antiplatelet therapy. Intensified antithrombotic treatment should be proposed in patients with CLTI following LLR to reduce the risk of MALE and MACE. Randomized controlled trials on antithrombotic therapy in patients with CLTI following LLR are scarce. Dual pathway inhibition is the only regimen for which an RCT demonstrated a reduction of MALE and MACE following LLR. Dual antiplatelet therapy appears to be associated with a reduced risk of MALE in CLTI following LLR.

Single Versus Double Antiplatelet Therapy in Patients Undergoing Endovascular Treatment With a Stent for an Iliac Occlusive Lesion

ObjectiveEndovascular treatment (EVT) for an aorto-iliac occlusive lesion is performed worldwide as first-line treatment. However, the choice of single antiplatelet therapy (SAPT) or double antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) after aorto-iliac revascularization is controversial. The purpose of the study was to assess clinical outcomes in patients with SAPT or DAPT after iliac EVT, using propensity score matching.MethodPatients who underwent EVT for a de-novo iliac occlusive lesion at a single center from 2017 to 2023 were analyzed retrospectively. Comparisons were made between SAPT and DAPT cases after propensity score matching. The primary endpoints of the study were freedom from restenosis and freedom from target lesion revascularization (TLR).ResultsA total of 150 patients underwent iliac EVT and received SAPT (n = 93) or DAPT (n = 57). The DAPT group had a significantly higher rate of coronary artery disease (P = .010). After matching, the differences in baseline and procedural details were diminished. The technical success rate of EVT, access site complications, and manual compression time did not differ between the groups. The median follow-up period was 33 (20-47) months. During follow-up, restenosis occurred in 11 cases (7%) and 10 cases (7%) underwent TLR. After matching, the 5-year freedom from restenosis did not differ significantly in the SAPT and DAPT groups (92% vs 90%, P = .80). Freedom from TLR also did not differ between the groups (P = .80). There was a tendency for a lower incident rate of major bleeding in the SAPT group (7% vs 18% at 5 years, P = .10).ConclusionsRetrospective analysis using propensity score matching showed that SAPT after iliac EVT resulted in similar freedom from restenosis and TLR compared with DAPT.

Variations in antithrombotic prescriptions and evaluation of extended clopidogrel therapy after lower extremity revascularization for peripheral artery disease

OBJECTIVES

The optimal antithrombotic combination and duration after open surgical or endovascular lower extremity revascularization (LER) in patients with peripheral arterial disease (PAD) lacks consensus. This study examines the variability of antithrombotic prescriptions in a tertiary care center, highlighting challenges in related research. The durations of the various prescriptions were captured, and this study focused on studying the impact of duration of clopidogrel therapy on patient outcomes.

METHODS

The electronic medical records of patients with PAD undergoing LER were reviewed. All antithrombotic prescriptions after initial LER were abstracted by pharmacists. Demographics and clinical characteristics of patients who received clopidogrel after initial LER were evaluated. A comparison of patients who received extended clopidogrel therapy (>12 months) compared with limited clopidogrel therapy (≤12 months) was performed. Perioperative and long-term outcomes were compared and analysis focused on major adverse limb events (MALEs), major adverse cardiac events (MACEs), and mortality.

RESULTS

A total of 1954 patients received 17 different perioperative antithrombotic combinations and 101 combinations over long-term follow-up. Clopidogrel was the most commonly used medication in 69.8% (n = 1363). Among patients treated with clopidogrel after LER, 69.5% (n = 947) received extended therapy (>12 months). Patients who received extended clopidogrel therapy were more likely to have had a prior endovascular procedure (21.8% vs 15.2%; P = .005); those who received limited therapy (≤12 months) were older (72 years vs 69 years; P < .001) and more likely to have congestive heart failure (21% vs 14%; P = .001) and chronic renal insufficiency (22.2% vs 15.6%; P < .004). Patients in the extended therapy group were more likely to be treated for claudication (57.5% vs 46.1%; P < .001) compared with patients with limited therapy, but there was no difference in revascularization strategies. Kaplan-Meier curves showed significantly higher overall survival, MALE-free survival, and MACE-free survival in patients with extended clopidogrel therapy without difference in freedom from MALE or MACE. Cox regression demonstrated independent association of limited clopidogrel therapy with mortality (hazard ratio [HR], 1.93; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.6-2.31), mortality or MALE (HR, 1.32; 95% CI, 1.14-1.53), and mortality or MACE (HR, 1.39; 95% CI, 1.2-1.62). The duration of clopidogrel therapy was not associated with bleeding.

CONCLUSIONS

The number of unique prescription combinations found in this study highlights real-world variations in antithrombotic therapy after revascularization for patients with PAD. Extended clopidogrel therapy was associated with improved survival compared with limited therapy in this analysis without an increase in bleeding. Observational studies of antithrombotic therapy are limited by extensive variations and factors affecting prescription patterns that can only be reconciled in prospective randomized trials.

Updates in Arterial Ulcers

Arterial ulcers are a clinical symptom of a complex array of underlying comorbid factors, namely peripheral artery disease (PAD). Chronic limb-threatening ischemia is representative of end-stage PAD. Ulcers of other etiologies can carry an arterial component, mandating recognition of risk factors, a comprehensive history and physical examination, and appropriate diagnostic testing in lower extremity ulcers. The primary therapy for arterial ulcers is re-establishment of in-line arterial flow, achieved by endovascular therapy or open revascularization. Medical management is essential to slow disease progression, and topical therapies are crucial to promote rapid ulcer closure and reduce infection risk.

Medical Optimization of Patients with Symptomatic Peripheral Arterial Disease

Peripheral artery disease (PAD) is a progressive disease associated with the occurrence of major adverse cardiovascular and limb events and elevated mortality rates. Symptoms of PAD, including claudication and chronic limb-threatening ischemia, impair functional capacity and lead to lower quality of life. The focus of current therapies is to minimize symptoms, improve quality of life, and reduce adverse cardiovascular and limb events. Among the medical therapies are antiplatelets, anticoagulants, antihypertensives, lipid lowering therapies, cilostazol and pentoxifylline, and novel blood sugar-lowering therapies, plus exercise therapy and smoking cessation. In this review, we discuss these evidence-based medical therapies that are available for patients with symptomatic PAD.

Comparison of efficacy and safety of sarpogrelate-based anti-platelet therapy with non-sarpogrelate-based anti-platelet therapy following arterial endovascular therapy: a systematic review

Objective

Sarpogrelate is a selective serotonin/5-hydroxytryptamine 2A receptor antagonist used in the management of peripheral artery disease (PAD). The drug has emerged as a promising choice for medical management post-endovascular therapy (EVT) due to its anti-platelet aggregation, vasoconstriction, and anti-vascular smooth muscle proliferation properties. The aim of the meta-analysis is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of sarpogrelate-based APT following arterial EVTs in PAD.

Material and methods

PubMed, Google Scholar, Scopus, and the Cochrane were systematically searched from inception to December 2023. Any randomized controlled trial studies in English that evaluated the efficacy and safety of sarpogrelate-based APT after EVT in patients with PAD was included. Data on the restenosis rate, target lesion revascularization (TLR), and safety parameters were extracted and studied. The pooled differences in efficacy and safety parameters between sarpogrelate-based APT and non-sarpogrelate-based APT was calculated using the relative risk (RR) with a 95% CI.

Results

A total of three randomized controlled trials were included out of 354 articles obtained through a literature search. No significant differences were observed in the risk of restenosis (RR=0.74, 95% CI= 0.55-1.00, P=0.954) and TLR (RR=0.76, 95% CI= 0.47-1.23, P=0.476) among patients being treated with sarpogrelate and non-sarpogrelate-based APT. Likewise, sarpogrelate-based APT had a similar safety profile as non-sarpogrelate-based APT.

Conclusion

Sarpogrelate-based APT can be considered an effective alternative to clopidogrel-based conventional APT after EVTs. However, there is a huge need for a larger multicenter, multinational, and multiethnic global trial with sufficient participants in order to produce generalizable findings.

Patient Factors Influencing Prescription of Antithrombotic Medication After Lower Limb Endovascular Intervention

OBJECTIVE

There is significant practice variation in the use of antithrombotic therapy after endovascular intervention for lower limb peripheral arterial disease, with differences in medication choice and duration. Prescriber decision making is complex, and patient factors have been shown to substantially contribute to prescribing variation. To determine the influence of patient factors on antithrombotic prescribing, a discrete choice experiment was distributed to vascular surgeons and trainees across Australia and Aotearoa New Zealand.

METHODS

After pilot testing, the discrete choice experiment questionnaire was distributed to 300 vascular surgeons and trainee members of the Australian and New Zealand Society for Vascular Surgery. Multinomial logistic regression models were used to analyse patient factors that had the most influence on decisions to prescribe a second antithrombotic agent, and the preferred choice of antithrombotic (clopidogrel 75 mg daily or rivaroxaban 2.5 mg twice daily) in addition to aspirin 100 mg daily. The odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) reported preference strength.

RESULTS

A total of 44 questionnaires were completed between September and October 2023, reaching the 15% targeted response rate. Prescribing a second antithrombotic was more likely after femoropopliteal stenting compared with angioplasty (OR 1.89, 95% CI 1.20 - 2.13), and in chronic limb threatening ischaemia compared with intermittent claudication (OR 1.58, 95% CI 1.20 - 2.13). Most respondents preferred clopidogrel over rivaroxaban (62%), with over a third of respondents exclusively prescribing clopidogrel. Patients with stents (OR 1.77, 95% CI 1.32 - 2.37) or moderate bleeding risk (OR 1.38, 95% CI 0.97 - 1.84) were more likely to receive clopidogrel than rivaroxaban.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrates that vascular surgeons primarily prioritise antithrombotic prescribing decisions by procedure type. Clopidogrel is more likely to be prescribed than rivaroxaban as a second agent in combination with aspirin, especially after stenting. Knowing these clinician preferences can target implementation strategies towards supporting decision making in subgroups of patients according to individual risk profiles.

The evidence base of the 10 most prescribed drugs in England, France, and the United States: a scoping review

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate whether there is evidence of efficacy of the most commonly used medications in their primary indications.

STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING

This scoping review was executed using the Cochrane Library and MEDLINE databases up to May 2023. The 10 most prescribed medications in England, France, and the United States were identified using country-specific public databases. Up to 3 common indications in primary care were defined for each medication, based on a survey of general practitioners. The outcomes were determined by the authors to be patient-important outcomes, with placebo as the comparator. Two investigators independently conducted searches, following a predefined algorithm, to identify randomized controlled trials or meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials assessing the efficacy of these medications for each indication. The risk of bias was assessed using the ROBIS or ROB 2.0 tools.

RESULTS

We identified 21 drugs, covering 56 indications and 114 outcomes. Sixty-seven percent of the evaluated medications demonstrated efficacy for at least one outcome in at least one of the sought indications. Overall, evidence of efficacy was found for 48% of the indications. There was no study evaluating the efficacy of amoxicillin and salbutamol. For other drugs such as phloroglucinol or cholecalciferol, available studies suggested an absence of efficacy in the most common indications.

CONCLUSION

This study underscores the lack of data regarding the level of evidence for the most prescribed medications. Limitations include the choice of outcomes, and the understanding that the absence of evidence is not synonymous with the absence of efficacy.

Anticoagulation in Patients with Premature Peripheral Artery Disease Undergoing Lower Extremity Revascularization

BACKGROUND

Premature peripheral artery disease (PAD), defined by lower extremity revascularization (LER) at age ≤ 50 years, is associated with poor major adverse limb events. The early onset of disease is thought to be influenced by genetic factors that regulate homeostasis of the vascular wall and coagulation. The aim of this study is to investigate the effect of anticoagulation as an adjunct to antiplatelet therapy on the outcomes of LER in patients with premature PAD.

METHODS

There were 8,804 patients with premature PAD on preoperative and postoperative antiplatelet therapy only and 1,236 patients on preoperative and postoperative anticoagulation plus antiplatelet therapy in the Vascular Quality Initiative peripheral vascular intervention, infrainguinal, and suprainguinal files. Propensity score matching (2:1) was performed between patients with premature PAD who were on antiplatelet therapy and those on anticoagulation plus antiplatelet therapy. Perioperative and 1-year outcomes were analyzed including reintervention, major amputation, and mortality.

RESULTS

Patients on anticoagulation were more likely to have coronary artery disease (48.7% vs. 41.2%, P < 0.001), congestive heart failure (20.2% vs. 13.1%, P < 0.001), and have undergone prior LER (73.9% vs. 49.2%, P < 0.001) compared to patients on antiplatelet therapy only. They were also less likely to be independently ambulatory (74.2% vs. 81.8%, P < 0.001) and be on a statin medication (66.8% vs. 74.3%, P < 0.001) compared to patients on antiplatelet therapy only. Patients on anticoagulation were also less likely to be treated for claudication (38.1% vs. 48.6%, P < 0.001), and less likely to be treated with an endovascular procedure (64.8% vs. 73.8%, P < 0.001). After matching for baseline characteristics, there were 1,256 patients on antiplatelet therapy only and 628 patients on anticoagulation. Patients on anticoagulation were more likely to require a return to the operating room (3.7% vs. 1.6%, P < 0.001) and had higher perioperative mortality (1.1% vs. 0.3%, P = 0.032), but major amputation was not significantly different (1.8% vs. 1.6%, P = 0.798) compared to patients on antiplatelet therapy alone. At 1 year, amputation-free survival was higher in patients on antiplatelets only compared to patients on anticoagulation and antiplatelet medications (87.5% vs. 80.9%, log-rank P = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Anticoagulation in addition to antiplatelet therapy in patients with premature PAD undergoing LER is associated with increased reintervention and mortality at 1 year.

2024 ACC/AHA/AACVPR/APMA/ABC/SCAI/SVM/SVN/SVS/SIR/VESS Guideline for the Management of Lower Extremity Peripheral Artery Disease: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines

AIM

The "2024 ACC/AHA/AACVPR/APMA/ABC/SCAI/SVM/SVN/SVS/SIR/VESS Guideline for the Management of Lower Extremity Peripheral Artery Disease" provides recommendations to guide clinicians in the treatment of patients with lower extremity peripheral artery disease across its multiple clinical presentation subsets (ie, asymptomatic, chronic symptomatic, chronic limb-threatening ischemia, and acute limb ischemia).

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search was conducted from October 2020 to June 2022, encompassing studies, reviews, and other evidence conducted on human subjects that was published in English from PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, CINHL Complete, and other selected databases relevant to this guideline. Additional relevant studies, published through May 2023 during the peer review process, were also considered by the writing committee and added to the evidence tables where appropriate.

STRUCTURE

Recommendations from the "2016 AHA/ACC Guideline on the Management of Patients With Lower Extremity Peripheral Artery Disease" have been updated with new evidence to guide clinicians. In addition, new recommendations addressing comprehensive care for patients with peripheral artery disease have been developed.

2024 ACC/AHA/AACVPR/APMA/ABC/SCAI/SVM/SVN/SVS/SIR/VESS Guideline for the Management of Lower Extremity Peripheral Artery Disease: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines

AIM

The "2024 ACC/AHA/AACVPR/APMA/ABC/SCAI/SVM/SVN/SVS/SIR/VESS Guideline for the Management of Lower Extremity Peripheral Artery Disease" provides recommendations to guide clinicians in the treatment of patients with lower extremity peripheral artery disease across its multiple clinical presentation subsets (ie, asymptomatic, chronic symptomatic, chronic limb-threatening ischemia, and acute limb ischemia).

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search was conducted from October 2020 to June 2022, encompassing studies, reviews, and other evidence conducted on human subjects that was published in English from PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, CINHL Complete, and other selected databases relevant to this guideline. Additional relevant studies, published through May 2023 during the peer review process, were also considered by the writing committee and added to the evidence tables where appropriate.

STRUCTURE

Recommendations from the "2016 AHA/ACC Guideline on the Management of Patients With Lower Extremity Peripheral Artery Disease" have been updated with new evidence to guide clinicians. In addition, new recommendations addressing comprehensive care for patients with peripheral artery disease have been developed.

Evidence for clinician underprescription of and patient non-adherence to guideline-recommended cardiovascular medications among adults with peripheral artery disease: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

International guidelines recommend that adults with peripheral artery disease (PAD) be prescribed antiplatelet, statin and antihypertensive medications. However, it is unclear how often people with PAD are underprescribed these drugs, which characteristics predict clinician underprescription of and patient non-adherence to guideline-recommended cardiovascular medications, and whether underprescription and non-adherence are associated with adverse health and health system outcomes.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

We will search MEDLINE, EMBASE and Evidence-Based Medicine Reviews from 2006 onwards. Two investigators will independently review abstracts and full-text studies. We will include studies that enrolled adults and reported the incidence and/or prevalence of clinician underprescription of or patient non-adherence to guideline-recommended cardiovascular medications among people with PAD; adjusted risk factors for underprescription of/non-adherence to these medications; and adjusted associations between underprescription/non-adherence to these medications and outcomes. Outcomes will include mortality, major adverse cardiac and limb events (including revascularisation procedures and amputations), other reported morbidities, healthcare resource use and costs. Two investigators will independently extract data and evaluate study risk of bias. We will calculate summary estimates of the incidence and prevalence of clinician underprescription/patient non-adherence across studies. We will also conduct subgroup meta-analyses and meta-regression to determine if estimates vary by country, characteristics of the patients and treating clinicians, population-based versus non-population-based design, and study risks of bias. Finally, we will calculate pooled adjusted risk factors for underprescription/non-adherence and adjusted associations between underprescription/non-adherence and outcomes. We will use Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation to determine estimate certainty.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Ethics approval is not required as we are studying published data. This systematic review will synthesise existing evidence regarding clinician underprescription of and patient non-adherence to guideline-recommended cardiovascular medications in adults with PAD. Results will be used to identify evidence-care gaps and inform where interventions may be required to improve clinician prescribing and patient adherence to prescribed medications.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42022362801.

A review of clopidogrel resistance in lower extremity arterial disease

Objective

Lower extremity arterial disease (LEAD) is a prevalent condition that produces a significant burden on health care systems. Patients with LEAD have an increased risk of major adverse cardiovascular events as well as major adverse limb events. Despite significant variation in guidance on antiplatelet therapy for LEAD worldwide, many governing bodies recommend clopidogrel as the preferred single anti-platelet agent. Clopidogrel is also used frequently in post-revascularization regimens, either as a single agent or as part of dual antiplatelet therapy. Clopidogrel is a thienopyridine prodrug that is metabolized in the liver by the CYP2C19 enzyme. Genetic variations in CYP2C19 are common and can influence an individual's ability to metabolize clopidogrel to its active metabolite.

Methods

This work completes a narrative review of the literature to consider whether CYP2C19 genetic testing should be routinely implemented in patients who are to be prescribed clopidogrel to improve outcomes in patients with LEAD.

Results

Recent advances in both cardiac and stroke medicine have demonstrated a role for patient genotyping to identify poor clopidogrel metabolizers and adopt alternative therapeutic strategies in these patient groups. This approach has been shown to improve clinical outcomes and has been incorporated into national and international guidance. Research studies suggest an association between CYP2C19 loss of function alleles and adverse outcomes in patients with LEAD taking clopidogrel.

Conclusions

The introduction of a precision medicine strategy in vascular surgery may have the potential to significantly improve clinical outcomes in this complex group of patients with multiple comorbidities.

Diabetes- versus smoking-related thrombo-inflammation in peripheral artery disease

Peripheral artery disease (PAD) is a major health problem with increased cardiovascular mortality, morbidity and disabling critical limb threatening ischemia (CLTI) and amputation. Diabetes mellitus (DM) and cigarette smoke are the main risk factors for the development of PAD. Although diabetes related PAD shows an accelerated course with worse outcome regarding complications, mortality and amputations compared with non-diabetic patients, current medical treatment does not make this distinction and includes standard antiplatelet and lipid lowering drugs for all patients with PAD. In this review we discuss the pathophysiologic mechanisms of PAD, with focus on differences in thrombo-inflammatory processes between diabetes-related and smoking-related PAD, and hypothesize on possible mechanisms for the progressive course of PAD in DM. Furthermore, we comment on current medical treatment and speculate on alternative medical drug options for patients with PAD and DM.

The Role of Antiplatelet in the Management of Sickle Cell Disease Patients

Sickle cell disease (SCD) is a genetic disorder characterized by abnormal hemoglobin, leading to red blood cell deformities and subsequent vaso-occlusive events. Platelet activation and adhesion play a significant role in the pathophysiology of SCD, contributing to the development of complications such as vaso-occlusive events, stroke, acute chest syndrome, and other manifestations. Antiplatelet therapy has emerged as a potential strategy to mitigate these complications by modulating the platelet function and reducing thrombotic events. This review article provides an overview of antiplatelet therapy's role in managing SCD patients. It discusses the pathophysiological abnormalities in the platelet function in SCD, the rationale for antiplatelet therapy, and the evidence supporting its use in various clinical scenarios. The article explores aspirin as the primary antiplatelet agent in SCD, including its mechanism of action, dosing considerations, and efficacy and safety data. Additionally, it highlights other antiplatelet agents, such as clopidogrel, prasugrel, ticagrelor, and emerging therapies under investigation. Clinical applications of antiplatelet therapy in primary and secondary prevention and the management of acute chest syndrome and other SCD complications are also discussed. Safety considerations are emphasized, including bleeding risk assessment, monitoring, and patient selection for antiplatelet therapy. Finally, the review highlights future research and clinical practice directions, including the development of novel antiplatelet agents, combination therapies, and the integration of antiplatelet therapy with other SCD treatments. Overall, this review provides a comprehensive understanding of the current role of antiplatelet therapy in SCD management, the challenges faced, and future directions for improving patient outcomes.

Emergent management of diabetic foot problems in the modern era: Improving outcomes

Limb amputation is a consequence, and the leading complication, of diabetic foot ulcers. Prevention depends on prompt diagnosis and management. Patients should be managed by multidisciplinary teams and efforts should be focused on limb salvage ("time is tissue"). The diabetic foot service should be organized in a way to meet the patient's clinical needs, with the diabetic foot centers at the highest level of this structure. Surgical management should be multimodal and include not only revascularization, but also surgical and biological debridement, minor amputations, and advanced wound therapy. Medical treatment, including an adequate antimicrobial therapy, has a key role in the eradication of infection and should be guided by microbiologists and infection disease physicians with special interest in bone infection. Input from diabetologists, radiologists, orthopedic teams (foot and ankle), orthotists, podiatrists, physiotherapists, and prosthetics, as well as psychological counseling, is required to make the service comprehensive. After the acute phase, a well-structured, pragmatic follow-up program is necessary to adequately manage the patients with the aim to detect earlier potential failures of the revascularization or antimicrobial therapy. Considering the cost and societal impact of diabetic foot problems, health care providers should provide resources to manage the burden of diabetic foot problems in the modern era.

Optimal Medical Management in Patients undergoing Peripheral Vascular Interventions for Chronic Limb Threatening Ischemia is associated with Improved Outcomes

OBJECTIVE

Optimizing medical management and risk factor modification are underutilized strategies in patients with chronic limb threatening ischemia (CLTI), despite evidence of improved outcomes. The Vascular Quality Initiative (VQI) registry is a tool to improve quality of vascular care. In this study, we used the VQI to evaluate trends in medical management in CLTI patients undergoing peripheral vascular interventions (PVI), and the impact of changes in management on overall survival (OS), amputation-free survival (AFS) and limb salvage (LS).

METHODS

Patients undergoing index PVI for CLTI between 2012-2016, with at least 24-month follow-up were identified from the national VQI registry. Patient details including smoking status and medication use, OS, LS, and AFS were analyzed with linear-by-linear association, t-test and logistic regression.

RESULTS

12,370 PVI were completed in 11,466 patients. There was a significant increase in infrapopliteal interventions (29.8% → 39.0%; P < .001) and PVI performed for tissue loss (TL) (59.1% → 66.5%; P < .001). The percentage of current smokers at time of PVI decreased (36.2% → 30.7%; P = .036). At discharge, statins were initiated in 25%, aspirin in 45% and P2Y12 therapy in 58% of patients not receiving these medications prior to PVI. Over the course of follow-up, dual antiplatelet (DAPT) (41.1% → 48.0%; P < .001), ACE-inhibitor (46.2% → 51.3%; P < .001), and statin (70.4% → 77.5%; P < .001) use increased. Combined DAPT, ACE-inhibitor and statin use increased from 33.6% → 39.6% (P=<.001). Significant improvement in 24-month OS and AFS was noted (OS, 90.9% → 93.7%; P = .002: AFS, 81.2% → 83.1%; P = .046) but not LS (89.6% → 89.0%; P = .83). Combined therapy with P2Y12 inhibitors, statins and ACE-inhibitors was an independent predictor of improved OS (HR 0.61; 0.39 - 0.96, P = .034). DAPT was independent predictor of improved LS (HR 0.83; 0.79 - 0.87, P < .007).

CONCLUSION

Antiplatelet, ACE-inhibitor and statin use increased over the study period and was associated with improved OS and AFS. Limb salvage trends did not change significantly over time, possibly due to inclusion of patients with higher disease burden or inadequate medical management. Medical management, although improved, remained far from optimal and represents an area for continued development.

Novel Aspects Targeting Platelets in Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease—A Translational Perspective

Platelets are important cellular targets in cardiovascular disease. Based on insights from basic science, translational approaches and clinical studies, a distinguished anti-platelet drug treatment regimen for cardiovascular patients could be established. Furthermore, platelets are increasingly considered as cells mediating effects “beyond thrombosis”, including vascular inflammation, tissue remodeling and healing of vascular and tissue lesions. This review has its focus on the functions and interactions of platelets with potential translational and clinical relevance. The role of platelets for the development of atherosclerosis and therapeutic modalities for primary and secondary prevention of atherosclerotic disease are addressed. Furthermore, novel therapeutic options for inhibiting platelet function and the use of platelets in regenerative medicine are considered.

Outcomes of Endovascular Reconstructive Techniques in Trans-Atlantic Inter-Society Consensus II C-D Aortoiliac Lesions

BACKGROUND

To describe the outcomes of the endovascular reconstruction of TASC C/D lesions involving the infrarenal aorta and aortic bifurcation with different techniques.

METHODS

This is an observational, retrospective, single-center study. In a 5-year period, we selected all the patients treated with an endovascular procedure for an aorto-iliac TASC C/D lesion involving the infrarenal aorta and/or the aortic bifurcation. Early (<30 days) outcomes were mortality, major amputation, and thrombosis. Late mid-term (1 and 3 years) outcomes were primary, assisted primary and secondary patency, limb salvage rate, and freedom from reintervention.

RESULTS

A total of 87 patients were treated during the index period. Kissing covered stent (cKS), covered reconstruction of aortic bifurcation (CERAB), and unimodular bifurcated AFX Unibody stent-graft (Bif-SG) implantation were performed in 35 (40.4%), 26 (29.8%), and 26 (29.8%) cases, respectively. Bif-SG group included 11 (11/26, 42.3%) patients treated for abdominal aortic aneurysm associated with the obstruction of the aortic bifurcation. Technical success was achieved in all cases and no ruptures or conversions to open surgery were recoded. Median follow-up age was 18 months (interquartile range [IQR], 8-34). Overall primary patency rate was 91.2% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 81.3-95.9) at 1 year and 83.5% (95% CI: 69.6-91.4) at 3 years. Assisted primary patency was 96.9% (95% CI: 87.8-99.2) at 1 and 3 years. Secondary patency was 97.8% (95% CI: 85.5-99.6) at 3 years. Limb salvage rate was 98.6% (95% CI: 90.1-99.7) at 1 and 3 years and, freedom from reintervention was 98.4% (95% CI: 88.9-99.7) at 1 year and 87% (95% CI: 66.1-95.4) at 3 years. Univariate analysis did not identify any factor affecting primary patency rate.

CONCLUSIONS

Endovascular reconstruction in severe aorto-iliac obstructions using advanced techniques offered promising mid-term patency rates and profiles of safety. The variety of reconstructive configurations allows surgeons to customize on patients' anatomies the type of revascularization.

A multicenter, randomized, open-labelled, non-inferiority trial of sustained-release sarpogrelate versus clopidogrel after femoropopliteal artery intervention

Optimal antiplatelet therapy after endovascular therapy (EVT) for peripheral artery disease is controversial. This trial aimed to evaluate whether sarpogrelate plus aspirin was non-inferior for preventing early restenosis after femoropopliteal (FP) EVT compared to clopidogrel plus aspirin. In this open-label, prospective randomized trial, 272 patients were enrolled after successful EVT for FP lesions. Patients in each group received aspirin 100 mg and clopidogrel 75 mg or sarpogrelate 300 mg orally once per day for 6 months. The primary outcome was target lesion restenosis at 6 months, tested for noninferiority. Patient characteristics and EVT patterns were similar, except for increased inflow procedures in the sarpogrelate group and increased outflow procedures in the clopidogrel group. The sarpogrelate group showed a tendency of less restenosis at 6 months than the clopidogrel group (13.0% vs. 19.1%, difference 6.1 percentage points, 95% CI for noninferiority - 0.047 to 0.169). Secondary endpoints related to safety outcomes were rare in both groups. Risks of target lesion restenosis of the two intervention arm were uniform across most major subgroups except for those with coronary artery disease. In conclusion, Sarpogrelate plus aspirin is non-inferior to clopidogrel plus aspirin in preventing early restenosis after FP EVT. Larger multi-ethnic trials are required to generalize these findings. Trial registration: National Institutes of Health Clinical Trials Registry (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02959606; 09/11/2016).

The antithrombosis effect of dehydroandrographolide succinate: in vitro and in vivo studies

CONTEXT

Dehydroandrographolide succinate (DAS) is mainly used in the clinical treatment of various infectious diseases. Its potential effects on platelet aggregation and blood coagulation systems have not been reported systematically.

OBJECTIVE

To explore whether DAS exerts an antithrombotic effect and its internal mechanism.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Human blood samples and Sprague-Dawley (SD) rats divided into control, aspirin (30 mg/kg), and DAS groups (200, 400 and 600 mg/kg) were used to measure the platelet aggregation rate, coagulation function, coagulation factor activity, and contents of thromboxane B₂ (TXB₂) and 6-keto-prostaglandin F_1α (6-keto-PGF_1α). The histopathology of the SD rat gastric mucosa was also observed. All rats were administered intragastric or intraperitoneal injections once a day for 3 consecutive days.

RESULTS

Compared to control group, DAS significantly inhibited the platelet aggregation rate (ED₅₀ = 386.9 mg/kg) by decreasing TXB₂ levels (1531.95 ± 649.90 pg/mL to 511.08 ± 411.82 pg/mL) and activating antithrombin III (AT-III) (103.22 ± 16.22% to 146.46 ± 8.96%) (p < 0.05). In addition, DAS significantly enhanced the coagulation factors FV (304.12 ± 79.65% to 443.44 ± 75.04%), FVII (324.19 ± 48.03% to 790.66 ± 225.56%), FVIII (524.79 ± 115.47% to 679.92 ± 143.34%), FX (34.90 ± 7.40% to 102.76 ± 29.41%) and FXI (38.12 ± 10.33% to 65.47 ± 34.08%), increased the content of Fg (2.18 ± 0.39 to 3.61 ± 0.37 g/L), shorten the PT (10.42 ± 0.44 to 9.22 ± 0.21 s), APTT (16.43 ± 1.4 to 14.07 ± 0.75 s) and TT time (37.04 ± 2.13 to 32.68 ± 1.29 s) (p < 0.05), while the aspirin group showed no such effect on these items but showed reduced activity of FII (89.21 ± 21.72% to 61.83 ± 8.95%) and FVIII (524.79 ± 115.47% to 306.60 ± 29.96%) (p < 0.05). Histopathological changes showed aspirin-induced gastric mucosa haemorrhage and the protective effect of DAS in the gastric mucosa.

CONCLUSIONS

DAS is more suitable than aspirin in thromboprophylaxis treatment, which provides a reliable theoretical and experimental basis for its clinical application.

Current Management of Peripheral Artery Disease: Focus on Pharmacotherapy

Peripheral artery disease (PAD) is the occlusion or narrowing of the arteries supplying the lower extremities. Peripheral artery disease has been estimated to affect approximately 240 million people worldwide, approximately 70% of whom are within low- or middle-income countries. Due to the ageing population and diabetes epidemic, the prevalence of PAD is rapidly rising. The symptoms of PAD are heterogeneous and thus a high index of suspicion is needed to prevent delays in diagnosis and treatment. Measurement of ankle brachial pressure index or arterial duplex ultrasound are traditionally used to diagnose PAD. Patients with PAD have a high risk of major adverse cardiovascular events. Early diagnosis and implementation of secondary cardiovascular prevention is therefore critical. This includes therapies to reduce low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, such as statins, ezetimibe and proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitors, blood-pressure reducing medications and anti-thrombotic drugs. Treatments to facilitate smoking cessation and control blood sugar if relevant and an exercise programme are also critical in reducing cardiovascular risk. Currently, these treatments are not well implemented. This review summarises the clinical presentation, risk factors and medical management of PAD. Global efforts are needed to reduce the burden from the growing PAD epidemic by implementing best practices and improving outcomes through further research.

P2Y12 Inhibitor Monotherapy is Associated with Superior Outcomes as Compared to Aspirin Monotherapy in Chronic Limb Threatening Ischemia

OBJECTIVE

Antiplatelet therapy is recommended in patients with Peripheral Arterial Disease (PAD) to reduce cardiovascular risk and improve outcomes. However, issues including the drug of choice and use of dual antiplatelet (DAPT) vs monotherapy remain unclear. This study aims to compare the impact of aspirin (ASA) monotherapy, P2Y12 monotherapy and DAPT on limb salvage (LS), amputation-free survival (AFS) and overall survival (OS) in patients undergoing lower extremity peripheral endovascular intervention (PVI) for chronic limb threatening ischemia (CLTI).

METHODS

The Vascular Quality Initiative PVI registry was used to identify index procedures completed for CLTI between 3/1/2010- 09/30/2017. Patients were categorized by antiplatelet use at the time of last follow-up. Patients not on antiplatelet therapy were compared with ASA, P2Y12 monotherapy and DAPT. Propensity score matched (PSM) samples were created for direct ASA vs P2Y12 and P2Y12 vs DAPT comparisons; veracity was confirmed by Chi-Square and Hosmer-Lemeshow. Kaplan Meier and Cox regression were performed for OS, AFS and LS.

RESULTS

12,433 index PVI were completed for CLTI in 11,503 subjects in the pre-matched sample. Antiplatelet use at follow-up was: 12% none, 31% ASA, 14% P2Y12 and 43% DAPT. Median FU was 1389 days. P2Y12 monotherapy was associated with improved outcomes as compared to ASA monotherapy, OS (87.8% vs 85.5%, P=.026; Cox HR 0.82(0.68-0.98); P= .03), AFS (79.6% vs74.8%, P<.001; Cox HR 0.75(0.65-0.86); P < .001) and LS (89.5% vs 86.8%, P= .013; Cox HR 0 .74(0.60-0.91); P= .004). P2Y12 monotherapy and DAPT had comparable OS (87.8% vs 88.9%, P= .62; Cox HR 0.94(0.77-1.14); P= .50), AFS (79.6% vs 81.5%, P= .33; Cox HR 0.92(0.78-1.07); P= .28) and LS (91.7% vs 89.4, P=.03; Cox HR 0.80 (0.64-1.00); P= .06).

CONCLUSIONS

P2Y12 monotherapy was associated with superior overall survival (OS), amputation-free survival (AFS) and limb salvage (LS) as compared to ASA monotherapy, and comparable OS, LS and AFS to dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) in patients undergoing peripheral endovascular interventions for chronic limb threatening ischemia. P2Y12 monotherapy may be considered over ASA monotherapy and DAPT in CLTI patient, especially in patients at high bleeding risk.

A Randomized Controlled Trial Evaluating Outcome Impact of Cilostazol in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease or at a High Risk of Cardiovascular Disease

Previous studies found that cilostazol has a favorable effect on glucose and lipid homeostasis, endothelial function, atherosclerosis, and vasculo-angiogenesis. However, it is poorly understood whether these effects can translate into better clinical outcomes. This study investigated the outcome effect of cilostazol in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) or at a high risk of cardiovascular (CV) disease. We conducted a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial involving 266 patients who received cilostazol, 200 mg/day (n = 134) or placebo (n = 132). Pre-specified clinical endpoints including composite major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) (CV death, non-fatal myocardial infarct, non-fatal stroke, hospitalization for heart failure, or unplanned coronary revascularization), the composite major coronary event (MCE) and major adverse CV and cerebrovascular event (MACCE), were prospectively assessed. The mean duration of follow-up was 2.9 years. Relative to placebo, cilostazol treatment had a borderline effect on risk reduction of MACE (hazard ratio [HR], 0.67; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.34–1.33), whereas the beneficial effect in favor of cilostazol was significant in patients with diabetes mellitus or a history of percutaneous coronary intervention (p for interaction, 0.02 and 0.06, respectively). Use of cilostazol, significantly reduced the risk of MCE (HR, 0.38; 95% CI, 0.17–0.86) and MACCE (HR, 0.47; 95% CI, 0.23–0.96). A significantly lower risk of angina pectoris (HR, 0.38; 95% CI, 0.17–0.86) was also observed in the cilostazol group. After multi-variable adjustment, cilostazol treatment independently predicted a lower risk of MCE. In conclusion, these results suggest cilostazol may have beneficial effects in patients with CAD or at a high risk of CV disease.

A Review of Antithrombotic Therapies for Patients with Chronic Peripheral Arterial Disease and after Revascularization

Peripheral arterial disease (PAD) represents a major health issue that significantly impacts patient's survival and quality of life. In addition to limb-related events, patients with PAD have an increased risk of myocardial infarction, stroke, and death. However, compared with coronary and cerebrovascular disease, studies addressing optimal risk reduction modalities including antithrombotic therapies in patients with PAD have been underrepresented in the literature. This publication serves as a narrative review of existing evidence on the effectiveness of antithrombotic therapy in patients with PAD. In patients with chronic stable PAD or post-revascularization, antithrombotic therapies including single or dual antiplatelet agents, anticoagulation, or a combination of these treatments have been shown to reduce cardiovascular and limb events. This narrative review provides a summary of the available literature on the management of patients with PAD, categorized into treatment strategies for chronic, post-endovascular treatment, and post-open surgical revascularization and to discuss the antithrombotic protocol utilized at our institution while providing a rational for our treatment algorithm.

Antithrombotic Treatment in Lower Extremity Peripheral Arterial Disease

Lower extremity arteries might be affected by atherosclerotic peripheral arterial disease (PAD), or by embolization causing ischaemic symptoms. Patients with PAD often have widespread atherosclerosis, and progression of PAD is associated with increased risk for both other cardiovascular events and cardiovascular mortality. Peripheral arterial disease patients should therefore be offered both non-pharmacological and pharmacological secondary prevention to reduce the risk for future ischemic arterial complications. This review is focussed on the rationale for recommendations on antiplatelet and anticoagulant treatment in PAD. Asymptomatic PAD does not warrant either anticoagulant or antiplatelet treatment, whereas patients with ischaemic lower extremity symptoms such as intermittent claudication or critical limb ischemia caused by atherosclerosis should be offered platelet antiaggregation with either low dose aspirin or clopidogrel. Combined treatment with aspirin and low-dose of the direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) rivaroxaban should be considered and weighed against bleeding risk in symptomatic PAD patients considered at high risk for recurrent ischaemic events and in patients having undergone endovascular or open surgical intervention for PAD. Patiens with cardiogenic embolization to lower extremity arteries should be recommended anticoagulant treatment with either one of the DOACs (apixaban, dabigatran, edoxaban, and rivaroxaban) or warfarin.

Predictors of outcome in diabetic patients undergoing infrapopliteal endovascular revascularization for chronic limb-threatening ischemia

OBJECTIVE

The incidence of chronic limb-threatening ischemia in diabetic patients is increasing. The factors influencing outcome after infrapopliteal revascularization in these patients are largely unknown. Therefore, this study aims to identify the impact of perioperative glucose control on the long-term outcomes in this patient cohort, and furthermore to identify other factors independently associated with outcome.

METHODS

Consecutive diabetic patients undergoing infrapopliteal endovascular revascularization for chronic limb-threatening ischemia were identified. Patients' demographics, procedural details, daily capillary blood glucose, and hemoglobin A1C levels were collected and analyzed against the study end points using Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 437 infrapopliteal target vessels were successfully crossed in 203 patients. Amputation-free survival by Kaplan-Meier (estimate (standard error)%) was 74 (3.3)% and 63 (3.7)%, primary patency was 61 (4.2)% and 50 (4.9)%, assisted primary patency was 69 (5.2)% and 55 (6.1)%, and secondary patency was 71 (3.8)% and 59 (4.1)% at 1 year and 2 years, respectively. Cox regression analysis showed high perioperative capillary blood glucose levels to be an independent predictor of binary restenosis (hazard ratio [HR], 1.49; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.31-1.1.78; P = .015). Postprocedural dual-antiplatelet therapy was found to be an independent predictor of amputation-free survival (HR, 1.69; 95% CI, 1.04-2.75; P = .033), and freedom from major adverse limb events (HR: 1.96; 95% CI, 1.16-3.27; P = .023) and baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate was significantly associated with better amputation-free survival (HR, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.31-0.87; P = .014).

CONCLUSIONS

Poor perioperative glycemic control is associated with a higher incidence of restenosis after infrapopliteal revascularization in diabetic patients. Dual antiplatelet therapy is associated with better outcomes in this group.

World regional differences in outcomes for patients with peripheral artery disease: Insights from the EUCLID trial

Regional variations exist in the epidemiology of peripheral artery disease (PAD), in comorbidities, use of secondary prevention, and outcomes. Large studies of these variations in worldwide populations are rare. The EUCLID (Examining Use of tiCagreLor In peripheral artery Disease) trial included 13,885 patients with PAD from four geographical regions (Central/South America, Europe, Asia, North America) and compared monotherapy with ticagrelor and clopidogrel. Inclusion criteria were either an ankle-brachial index < 0.80 or a prior revascularization. The primary efficacy endpoint was time to first occurrence of any event in the composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, or ischemic stroke and did not differ between the study arms. This post hoc analysis of EUCLID confirmed that regional differences occurred in the inclusion criteria with more prior revascularization in North America (73.9%) and Asia (72.5%) compared with Central/South America (34.0%) and Europe (51.6%). The characteristics of patients also differed. Prior amputation at baseline was most frequent in Central/South America (6.3%) compared with other regions (1.6-2.8%). A history of stroke was most common in Asia, coronary heart disease in North America, and diabetes in Central/South America compared with other regions. The incidence of outcomes in patients with PAD varied by region. North America had the highest rate of the primary combined endpoint (5.97 events/100 patient-years). Corresponding rates were 4.80, 3.95, and 3.87 for Asia, Europe, and Central/South America, respectively. Hospitalization for acute limb ischemia (events/100 patient-years) was most frequent in Europe (0.75) and North America (0.74) compared with Asia (0.60) and Central/South America (0.33). Adjustment for inclusion criteria and relevant PAD characteristics did not have a major impact on these regional differences. Further adjustment for concomitant disease, risk factors, and preventive medication modified the regional differences only marginally. In conclusion, substantial regional differences were found in cardiovascular and limb outcomes in patients with PAD and were not explained by variation in the category of included patients, concomitant disease, risk factors, and prevention. Such differences, which may be due to variation in other factors such as background population rates or clinical care, need to be considered when designing and interpreting large international studies (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01732822).

World regional differences in outcomes for patients with peripheral artery disease: Insights from the EUCLID trial

Regional variations exist in the epidemiology of peripheral artery disease (PAD), in comorbidities, use of secondary prevention, and outcomes. Large studies of these variations in worldwide populations are rare. The EUCLID (Examining Use of tiCagreLor In peripheral artery Disease) trial included 13,885 patients with PAD from four geographical regions (Central/South America, Europe, Asia, North America) and compared monotherapy with ticagrelor and clopidogrel. Inclusion criteria were either an ankle–brachial index < 0.80 or a prior revascularization. The primary efficacy endpoint was time to first occurrence of any event in the composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, or ischemic stroke and did not differ between the study arms. This post hoc analysis of EUCLID confirmed that regional differences occurred in the inclusion criteria with more prior revascularization in North America (73.9%) and Asia (72.5%) compared with Central/South America (34.0%) and Europe (51.6%). The characteristics of patients also differed. Prior amputation at baseline was most frequent in Central/South America (6.3%) compared with other regions (1.6–2.8%). A history of stroke was most common in Asia, coronary heart disease in North America, and diabetes in Central/South America compared with other regions. The incidence of outcomes in patients with PAD varied by region. North America had the highest rate of the primary combined endpoint (5.97 events/100 patient-years). Corresponding rates were 4.80, 3.95, and 3.87 for Asia, Europe, and Central/South America, respectively. Hospitalization for acute limb ischemia (events/100 patient-years) was most frequent in Europe (0.75) and North America (0.74) compared with Asia (0.60) and Central/South America (0.33). Adjustment for inclusion criteria and relevant PAD characteristics did not have a major impact on these regional differences. Further adjustment for concomitant disease, risk factors, and preventive medication modified the regional differences only marginally. In conclusion, substantial regional differences were found in cardiovascular and limb outcomes in patients with PAD and were not explained by variation in the category of included patients, concomitant disease, risk factors, and prevention. Such differences, which may be due to variation in other factors such as background population rates or clinical care, need to be considered when designing and interpreting large international studies (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01732822).

CIRSE Standards of Practice on Below-the-Knee Revascularisation

The CIRSE Standards of Practice Committee established a writing group that was tasked with producing up-to-date recommendations for performing below-the-knee revascularisation, taking into account data on novel techniques, devices, and long-term outcomes that have emerged over the last decade. CIRSE Standards of Practice documents are not clinical practice guidelines or systematic reviews of the literature. This document is not intended to impose a standard of clinical patient care but recommends a reasonable approach to and best practices for performing below-the-knee revascularisation.

Efficacy and Tolerability of Combination Treatments for Major Depression: Antidepressants plus Second-Generation Antipsychotics vs. Esketamine vs. Lithium

BACKGROUND

Successful treatment of major depressive disorder (MDD) can be challenging, and failures ("treatment-resistant depression" [TRD]) are frequent. Steps to address TRD include increasing antidepressant dose, combining antidepressants, adding adjunctive agents, or using nonpharmacological treatments. Their relative efficacy and tolerability remain inadequately tested. In particular, the value and safety of increasingly employed second-generation antipsychotics (SGAs) and new esketamine, compared to lithium as antidepressant adjuncts remain unclear.

METHODS

We reviewed randomized, placebo-controlled trials and used random-effects meta-analysis to compare odds ratio (OR) versus placebo, as well as numbers-needed-to-treat (NNT) and to-harm (NNH), for adding SGAs, esketamine, or lithium to antidepressants for major depressive episodes.

RESULTS

Analyses involved 49 drug-placebo pairs. By NNT, SGAs were more effective than placebo (NNT = 11 [CI: 9-15]); esketamine (7 [5-10]) and lithium (5 [4-10]) were even more effective. Individually, aripiprazole, olanzapine+fluoxetine, risperidone, and ziprasidone all were more effective (all NNT < 10) than quetiapine (NNT = 13), brexpiprazole (16), or cariprazine (16), with overlapping NNT CIs. Risk of adverse effects, as NNH for most-frequently reported effects, among SGAs versus placebo was 5 [4-6] overall, and highest with quetiapine (NNH = 3), lowest with brexpiprazole (19), 5 (4-6) for esketamine, and 9 (5-106) with lithium. The risk/benefit ratio (NNH/NNT) was 1.80 (1.25-10.60) for lithium and much less favorable for esketamine (0.71 [0.60-0.80]) or SGAs (0.45 [0.17-0.77]).

CONCLUSIONS

Several modern antipsychotics and esketamine appeared to be useful adjuncts to antidepressants for acute major depressive episodes, but lithium was somewhat more effective and better tolerated.

LIMITATIONS

Most trials of adding lithium involved older, mainly tricyclic, antidepressants, and the dosing of adjunctive treatments were not optimized.

Antithrombotic therapy in diabetes: which, when, and for how long?

Cardiovascular disease remains the main cause of mortality in individuals with diabetes mellitus (DM) and also results in significant morbidity. Premature and more aggressive atherosclerotic disease, coupled with an enhanced thrombotic environment, contributes to the high vascular risk in individuals with DM. This prothrombotic milieu is due to increased platelet activity together with impaired fibrinolysis secondary to quantitative and qualitative changes in coagulation factors. However, management strategies to reduce thrombosis risk remain largely similar in individuals with and without DM. The current review covers the latest in the field of antithrombotic management in DM. The role of primary vascular prevention is discussed together with options for secondary prevention following an ischaemic event in different clinical scenarios including coronary, cerebrovascular, and peripheral artery diseases. Antiplatelet therapy combinations as well as combination of antiplatelet and anticoagulant agents are examined in both the acute phase and long term, including management of individuals with sinus rhythm and those with atrial fibrillation. The difficulties in tailoring therapy according to the variable atherothrombotic risk in different individuals are emphasized, in addition to the varying risk within an individual secondary to DM duration, presence of complications and predisposition to bleeding events. This review provides the reader with an up-to-date guide for antithrombotic management of individuals with DM and highlights gaps in knowledge that represent areas for future research, aiming to improve clinical outcome in this high-risk population.

Evidence-Based Recommendations for Medical Management of Peripheral Artery Disease

Patients with lower limb artery stenosis or occlusion (peripheral artery disease; PAD) have been determined to be at very high risk of both major adverse cardiovascular events, such as myocardial infarction and stroke, and major adverse limb events, such as amputation and requirement for artery surgery.Effective medical management has been identified as key in reducing this risk; however, this is often poorly implemented in clinical practice. Thus, the aim of this narrative review was to summarize the current evidence on the medical management of PAD in order to inform clinicians and highlight recommendations for clinical practice. International guidelines, randomized controlled trials, and relevant systematic reviews and meta-analyses have been included in this study. The focus was the management of the key modifiable risk factors to mitigate possible adverse events through prescription of anti-platelet and anticoagulation drugs and medications to control low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, blood pressure, and diabetes and aid smoking cessation. The available evidence from randomized clinical trials provide a strong rationale for the need for holistic medical management programs that are effective in achieving uptake of these medical therapies in patients with PAD. In conclusion, people with PAD have some of the highest adverse event rates among those with cardiovascular diseases. Secondary preventive measures have been proven effective in reducing these adverse events; however, they remain to be adequately implemented. Thus, the need for an effective implementation program has emerged to reduce adverse events in this patient group.

Clinical considerations after endovascular therapy of peripheral artery disease

Introduction: Patients with peripheral artery disease (PAD) are at higher risk for all-cause mortality, driven by increased cardiovascular mortality rates. In this manuscript we review the literature on guideline-recommended therapies and discuss the major clinical considerations after endovascular therapy of PAD.Areas covered: Current guidelines recommend smoking cessation, aspirin, statin, and renin-angiotensin system inhibitors in order to reduce the risk of cardiovascular and limb-related adverse events. Nonetheless, studies have shown that patients with PAD are undertreated with these important medical therapies. Additionally, there is lack in evidence regarding the most optimal follow up imaging approach for early detection of disease recurrence and re-intervention among patients undergoing endovascular therapy for PAD. We also describe the benefits of supervised walking exercise for patients with PAD that undergo revascularization procedures and are fit for such interventions.Expert opinion: Adherence to guideline recommended medical therapy is crucial for improved outcomes in PAD management. Systematic assessment of risk-reduction interventions could help increase adherence to clinically beneficial interventions and improve the overall prognosis of patients with PAD undergoing revascularization procedures. Additionally, optimization of current follow up protocols is needed, with the optimal goal to develop standardized cost-effective algorithms regarding early detection of disease recurrence and re-intervention.

[Randomized study of tolerability, safety and efficacy of Pletax in intermittent claudication]

AIM

This study was aimed at assessing tolerability, safety and therapeutic efficacy of Pletax® (cilostazol) compared with Trental® (pentoxifylline) in patients with moderate-to-severe intermittent claudication.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The study included a total of one hundred 40-to-65-year-old patients presenting with confirmed diagnosis of moderate-to-severe intermittent claudication. Depending on the therapeutic regimen, the patients were divided into two groups. Group 1: 50 patients orally took Pletax® (cilostazol) at a dose of 100 mg twice daily 30 minutes before meals or 2 hours after meals together with conventional therapy. Group 2: 50 patients took oral Trental® (pentoxifylline) in a dose of 400 mg 3 times daily 30 minutes before meals or 2 hours after meals along with conventional therapy. The duration of the follow up period amounted to 24 weeks for both groups. The treadmill test was carried out at room temperature, with the running track tilt angle of 0° at a speed of 3 km/h. The primary parameters of efficacy were as follows: the dynamics of the minimal walking distance (a distance walked by the patient until the appearance of pain in the extremity) and dynamics of the maximal walking distance (a distance walked by the patients until full stop due to pain in the extremity).

RESULTS

Analysing efficacy demonstrated higher results of Pletax® compared with Trental®. The obtained findings suggested that Pletax® showed a significant clinical effect as soon as at 2 weeks, followed by advantage during the whole period of follow up. Analysing the parameters of the minimal and maximal walking distances in the group of patients taking Pletax® demonstrated clear superiority over the Trental® group as soon as by week 2 of administration, which preserved during the whole follow-up period. The minimal pain-free walking distance in the Pletax group at baseline amounted to 92.9±83.4 m (Trental group - 92.3±78.4; p=0.3), followed by an increase at week 8 to 126±115 m (Trental group - 116±96.3; p=0.51), at week 16 to 136±116 m (Trental group - 118±95.5; p=0.04), at week 24 to 149±126 b (Trental group - 127±98.9; p=0.01). At the same time, the effect of Pletax® and Trental® on the secondary parameter of efficacy, i.e., the ankle-brachial index was comparable: at baseline - 0.472 and 0.482 (p=0.28), at 2 weeks - 0.48 and 0.483 (p=031), at 8 weeks - 0.49 and 0.485 (p=0.74), at 16 weeks - 0.494 and 0.492 (p=0.2), at 24 weeks - 0.501 and 0.496 (p=0.45).

CONCLUSION

The obtained findings demonstrated advantages of Pletax® over Trental®, manifesting themselves in the achievement of the highest parameters by such criteria as the minimal and maximal walking distance. High safety and efficacy of Pletax® were confirmed by low frequency of unfavourable events during therapy.

[Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta in haemodynamically unstable patients with bleeding (webinar review)]

This article reviews a webinar of the European Society for Vascular Surgery and the Endovascular Trauma and Resuscitation Management Society, dedicated to using endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta in haemodynamically unstable patients, briefly covering the main conclusions of the reports and underlining prospects of this method. Possibilities of using aortic balloon occlusion arise interest of various-specialty medical experts, and the number of scientific works in this field has increasingly been growing, thus explaining the need for measures and studies on the subject concerned.

Therapeutic Effects of Medication Use on Intermittent Claudication: A Network Meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To systematically evaluate the therapeutic effects of commonly used drugs for the treatment of intermittent claudication in patients with peripheral arterial diseases.

METHODS

We systematically searched bibliographic databases for randomized clinical trials published between 2000 and 2020, through the China National Knowledge Infrastructure, WanFang Data, PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane library. Included studies focused on therapeutic effects of beraprost, clopidogrel, aspirin, sarpogrelate and cilostazol on treating intermittent claudication. The outcome measures were maximum walking distance, pain-free walking distance, ankle-brachial index, and severe adverse events. The quality of included trials was evaluated by using the bias risk assessment tool recommended by the Cochrane, after extracting data from the literatures. Stata was used to conduct the network meta-analysis.

RESULTS

There were 27 randomized control trials included in the study, covering in total 9491 patients. The network meta-analysis results showed that for maximum walking distance, better therapeutic effect was noted in using beraprost, sarpogrelate, and cilostazol. Beraprost, beraprost combined with aspirin, and sarpogrelate were better in improving pain-free walking distance than other drugs. For the ankle-brachial index, cilostazol combined with clopidogrel, sarpogrelate, and beraprost had better therapeutic effects than others. The use of sarpogrelate, beraprost, and aspirin was associated with a lower ratio of severe adverse events than the use of cilostazol and placebo.

CONCLUSIONS

Among the commonly used drugs for the treatment of intermittent claudication, beraprost and sarpogrelate may have better efficacy in improving the walking distance and ankle-brachial index, with a beneficial effect on cardiovascular and cerebrovascular comorbidities.

Efficacy and Safety of Adjunctive Cilostazol to Clopidogrel-Treated Diabetic Patients With Symptomatic Lower Extremity Artery Disease in the Prevention of Ischemic Vascular Events

Background Type 2 diabetes mellitus is a risk factor for lower extremity arterial disease. Cilostazol expresses antiplatelet, anti-inflammatory, and vasodilator actions and improves the claudication intermittent symptoms. We investigated the efficacy and safety of adjunctive cilostazol to clopidogrel-treated patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus exhibiting symptomatic lower extremity arterial disease, in the prevention of ischemic vascular events and improvement of the claudication intermittent symptoms. Methods and Results In a prospective 2-arm, multicenter, open-label, phase 4 trial, patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus with intermittent claudication receiving clopidogrel (75 mg/d) for at least 6 months, were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio, either to continue to clopidogrel monotherapy, without receiving placebo cilostazol (391 patients), or to additionally receive cilostazol, 100 mg twice/day (403 patients). The median duration of follow-up was 27 months. The primary efficacy end point, the composite of acute ischemic stroke/transient ischemic attack, acute myocardial infarction, and death from vascular causes, was significantly reduced in patients receiving adjunctive cilostazol compared with the clopidogrel monotherapy group (sex-adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 0.468; 95% CI, 0.252-0.870; P=0.016). Adjunctive cilostazol also significantly reduced the stroke/transient ischemic attack events (sex-adjusted HR, 0.38; 95% CI, 0.15-0.98; P=0.046) and improved the ankle-brachial index and pain-free walking distance values (P=0.001 for both comparisons). No significant difference in the bleeding events, as defined by Bleeding Academic Research Consortium criteria, was found between the 2 groups (sex-adjusted HR, 1.080; 95% CI, 0.579-2.015; P=0.809). Conclusions Adjunctive cilostazol to clopidogrel-treated patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus with symptomatic lower extremity arterial disease may lower the risk of ischemic events and improve intermittent claudication symptoms, without increasing the bleeding risk, compared with clopidogrel monotherapy. Registration URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT02983214.

Efficacy and Safety of Antiplatelet Therapies in Symptomatic Peripheral Artery Disease: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Clopidogrel monotherapy is guideline-recommended in symptomatic peripheral artery disease (PAD). The advent of new antithrombotic strategies prompts an updated analysis of available evidence on antiplatelet therapy for PAD.

METHODS

We searched MEDLINE, Embase and CENTRAL through January 2019 for randomised controlled trials and observational studies comparing antiplatelet therapies as monotherapy, dual therapy, or combination with anticoagulants. Efficacy (major adverse cardiovascular events, acute or chronic limb ischaemia, vascular amputation, peripheral revascularisation) and safety (all-cause mortality and overall bleeding) outcomes were evaluated via Bayesian network meta-analyses.

RESULTS

We analysed 26 randomised controlled trials. Clopidogrel (hazard ratio, HR, 0.78; 95% credible interval [CrI] 0.65-0.93) and ticagrelor (HR 0.80; 95% CrI 0.65-0.98) significantly reduced major adverse cardiovascular events risk compared with aspirin. No significant difference was observed for dual antiplatelet therapy with clopidogrel and aspirin. Vorapaxar significantly reduced limb ischaemia and revascularisation compared with placebo, while dual antiplatelet therapy with clopidogrel and aspirin showed a trend for reduced risk of amputation compared with aspirin (risk ratio 0.68; 95% CrI 0.43-1.04). For all-cause mortality, picotamide, vorapaxar, dipyridamole with aspirin, and ticlopidine showed a significantly lower risk of all-cause mortality vs aspirin. Clopidogrel and ticagrelor showed similar overall bleeding risk vs aspirin, while dual antiplatelet therapy with clopidogrel and aspirin significantly increased bleeding risk.

CONCLUSION

This updated network meta-analysis confirms that clopidogrel significantly decreases the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events compared with aspirin, without increasing bleeding risk. Clopidogrel should remain a mainstay of PAD treatment, at least in patients at higher bleeding risk.

Polyvascular disease: A narrative review of current evidence and a consideration of the role of antithrombotic therapy

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Polyvascular disease (PVD) affects approximately 20% of patients with atherosclerosis and is a strong independent risk factor for ischemic outcomes. However, guidelines do not address screening or treatment for PVD, and there have been no PVD-specific trials. We reviewed subgroup analyses of large randomized controlled trials of more intense antithrombotic therapy to determine whether increased intensity of therapy improved ischemic outcomes in patients with PVD.

METHODS

MEDLINE, MEDLINE in-Process, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library were queried for randomized controlled trials larger than 5000 patients evaluating secondary prevention therapies in patients with coronary artery disease or lower extremity peripheral artery disease.

RESULTS

Thirteen trials were included ranging in size from 7243 to 27,395 patients. In 9 trials (CHARISMA, TRA 2°P-TIMI 50, PEGASUS-TIMI 54, VOYAGER PAD, TRACER, EUCLID, TRILOGY ACS, PLATO, and COMPASS), patients in the PVD subgroup treated with increased-intensity antithrombotic therapy had similar or greater relative risk reductions for ischemic events in comparison with the general trial cohorts. In four trials (DAPT, THEMIS, APPRAISE-2, and ATLAS ACS 2 TIMI 51), the PVD subgroup had an increased hazard of ischemic events with increased-intensity therapy compared with the general trial cohorts.

CONCLUSIONS

More intense antithrombotic therapy in patients with PVD was associated with a similar relative risk reduction for ischemic events compared with patients without PVD. Therefore, patients with PVD benefit from a larger absolute risk reduction because of their higher baseline risk. Future trials in patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease should intentionally include PVD patients to adequately assess treatment options for this under-studied, under-treated population.