Performance Evaluation of the Verigene Gram-Positive and Gram-Negative Blood Culture Test for Direct Identification of Bacteria and Their Resistance Determinants from Positive Blood Cultures in Hong Kong

From Throat to Limb: A Novel Case of Compartment Syndrome Following Group A Streptococcal Pharyngitis

Acute compartment syndrome is a medical emergency caused by increased pressure within a closed fascial space, leading to tissue ischemia and potential limb loss or death if untreated. While typically secondary to trauma, rare cases have been associated with streptococcal infections. However, no documented case exists of compartment syndrome originating from Group A Streptococcus (GAS) pharyngitis. We present a 35-year-old female, with prediabetes, who presented to the emergency department with worsening right lower extremity (RLE) pain and edema following a febrile illness with pharyngitis. Throat swab on admission and subsequent blood cultures tested positive for beta-hemolytic GAS. Despite initial management for sepsis and cellulitis with myositis, she developed compartment syndrome requiring urgent fasciotomy. Her postoperative course was complicated by hypotension, toxic shock-like syndrome, menorrhagia, and transaminitis, but she ultimately recovered with IV antibiotics and stepwise Jacob's Ladder surgical wound closure. This report serves as the first known case of nontraumatic acute lower extremity compartment syndrome derived from disseminated GAS pharyngitis and may point to the development of novel virulence factor(s) for emerging strains of GAS in the United States. The case underscores the importance of recognizing GAS pharyngitis as a potential source of severe systemic infections, as early identification and aggressive management of invasive GAS infections may help prevent life-threatening complications.

Performance of molecular tests for diagnosis of bloodstream infections in the clinical setting: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Rapid identification of bloodstream pathogens and associated antimicrobial resistance (AMR) profiles by molecular tests from positive blood cultures (PBCs) have the potential to improve patient management and clinical outcomes.

OBJECTIVES

A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted to evaluate diagnostic test accuracy (DTA) of molecular tests from PBCs for detecting pathogens and AMR in the clinical setting.

METHODS

.

DATA SOURCES

Medline, Embase, Cochrane, conference proceedings, and study bibliographies were searched.

STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

Studies evaluating DTA of commercially available molecular tests vs. traditional phenotypic identification and susceptibility testing methods in patients with PBCs were eligible.

PARTICIPANTS

Patients with PBCs.

TESTS

Commercially available molecular tests.

REFERENCE STANDARD

Traditional phenotypic identification and susceptibility testing methods (standard of care, SOC).

ASSESSMENT OF RISK OF BIAS

Study quality was assessed using Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2.

METHODS OF DATA SYNTHESIS

Summary DTA outcomes were estimated using bivariate random-effects models for gram-negative bacteria (GNB), gram-positive bacteria (GPB), yeast, GNB-AMR, GPB-AMR, and specific targets when reported by ≥ 2 studies (PROSPERO CRD42023488057).

RESULTS

Seventy-four studies including 24 590 samples were analysed, most of which had a low risk of bias. When compared with SOC, molecular tests showed 92-99% sensitivity, 99-100% specificity, 99-100% positive predictive value, and 97-100% negative predictive value for identifying total GNB (43 studies), GPB (38 studies), yeast (24 studies), GNB-AMR (35 studies), and GPB-AMR (39 studies). For individual pathogen targets, 93-100% sensitivity, 98-100% specificity, 86-100% positive predictive value, and 99-100% negative predictive value were estimated. Five of seven AMR genes had 91-99% sensitivity and 99-100% specificity. Sensitivity was lower for IMP (four studies; 62%; 95% CI, 34-83%) and VIM (four studies; 70%; 95% CI, 38-90%) carbapenemases, where genes were not detected or were not harboured in Pseudomonas aeruginosa (i.e. low prevalence). Performance of molecular tests in detecting AMR was generally comparable when grouped by geographical region (Europe, North America, and East Asia).

DISCUSSION

High DTA support the use of molecular tests in identifying a broad panel of pathogens and detecting AMR in GNB and GPB.

Getting Up to Speed: Rapid Pathogen and Antimicrobial Resistance Diagnostics in Sepsis

Sepsis is a life-threatening organ dysfunction caused by a dysregulated host response to infection. Time to receive effective therapy is a primary determinant of mortality in patients with sepsis. Blood culture is the reference standard for the microbiological diagnosis of bloodstream infections, despite its low sensitivity and prolonged time to receive a pathogen detection. In recent years, rapid tests for pathogen identification, antimicrobial susceptibility, and sepsis identification have emerged, both culture-based and culture-independent methods. This rapid narrative review presents currently commercially available approved diagnostic molecular technologies in bloodstream infections, including their clinical performance and impact on patient outcome, when available. Peer-reviewed publications relevant to the topic were searched through PubMed, and manufacturer websites of commercially available assays identified were also consulted as further sources of information. We have reviewed data about the following technologies for pathogen identification: fluorescence in situ hybridization with peptide nucleic acid probes (Accelerate PhenoTM), microarray-based assay (Verigene®), multiplex polymerase chain reaction (cobas® eplex, BioFire® FilmArray®, Molecular Mouse, Unyvero BCU SystemTM), matrix-assisted laser desorption-ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (Rapid MBT Sepsityper®), T2 magnetic resonance (T2Bacteria Panel), and metagenomics-based assays (Karius©, DISQVER®, Day Zero Diagnostics). Technologies for antimicrobial susceptibility testing included the following: Alfed 60 ASTTM, VITEK® REVEALTM, dRASTTM, ASTar®, Fastinov®, QuickMIC®, ResistellTM, and LifeScale. Characteristics, microbiological performance, and issues of each method are described, as well as their clinical performance, when available.

Effect of rapid cefpodoxime disk screening for early detection of third-generation cephalosporin resistance in Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae bacteremia

BACKGROUND

Several methods have been reported for detecting resistance genes or phenotypic testing on the day of positive blood culture in Escherichia coli or Klebsiella pneumoniae bacteremia. However, some facilities have not introduced these methods because of costs or other reasons. Toyota Kosei Hospital introduced cefpodoxime (CPDX) rapid screening on May 7, 2018, to enable early detection of third-generation cephalosporin resistance. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the effects of intervention with an Antimicrobial Stewardship Team using CPDX rapid screening.

METHODS

Cefotaxime (CTX)-resistant E. coli or K. pneumoniae bacteremia cases were selected retrospectively and divided into two groups: the pre-CPDX screening (June 1, 2015, to May 6, 2018) and CPDX screening groups (July 7, 2018, to August 31, 2021). The primary outcome was the proportion of cases in which modifications were made to the administration of susceptible antimicrobial agents within 24 h of blood culture-positive reports.

RESULTS

Overall, 63 patients in the pre-CPDX screening group and 84 patients in the CPDX screening group were eligible for analysis. The proportion of patients who modified to susceptible antimicrobial agents within 24 h of blood culture-positive reports was significantly increased in the CPDX screening group compared to that in the pre-CPDX screening group (6.3% vs. 22.6%, p = 0.010).

CONCLUSION

The results demonstrated that in CTX-resistant E. coli or K. pneumoniae bacteremia, CPDX rapid screening increased the proportion of early initiation of appropriate antimicrobial agents.

From bottle to bedside: Implementation considerations and antimicrobial stewardship considerations for bloodstream infection rapid diagnostic testing

Antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) programs have been quick to adopt novel molecular rapid diagnostic technologies (mRDTs) for bloodstream infections (BSIs) to improve antimicrobial management. As such, most of the literature demonstrating the clinical and economic benefits of mRDTs for BSI is in the presence of active AMS intervention. Leveraging mRDTs to improve antimicrobial therapy for BSI is increasingly integral to AMS program activities. This narrative review discusses available and future mRDTs, the relationship between the clinical microbiology laboratory and AMS programs, and practical considerations for optimizing the use of these tools within a health system. Antimicrobial stewardship programs must work closely with their clinical microbiology laboratories to ensure that mRDTs are used to their fullest benefit while remaining cognizant of their limitations. As more mRDT instruments and panels become available and AMS programs continue to expand, future efforts must consider the expansion beyond traditional settings of large academic medical centers and how combinations of tools can further improve patient care.

Reporting of Antimicrobial Resistance from Blood Cultures, an Antibacterial Resistance Leadership Group Survey Summary: Resistance Marker Reporting Practices from Positive Blood Cultures

BACKGROUND

We assessed how laboratories use and handle reporting of results of rapid diagnostics performed on positive blood culture broths, with a focus on antimicrobial resistance (AMR) markers.

METHODS

A survey assembled by the Antibacterial Resistance Leadership Group Diagnostics Committee was circulated from December 2020 to May 2021. The survey was sent to local hospitals, shared on the ClinMicroNet and Division C listservs, and included in a College of American Pathologists proficiency testing survey.

RESULTS

Ninety-six laboratories of various sizes across the United States (95%) and outside of the United States (5%) participated. Of the laboratories that had at least 1 rapid diagnostic in place (94%), significant heterogeneity in methods used and reporting practices was found across community (52%) and academic (40%) laboratories serving hospitals of various sizes. Respondents had implemented 1 to 6 different panels/platforms for a total of 31 permutations. Methods of reporting rapid organism identification and AMR results varied from listing all targets as "detected"/"not detected" (16-22%) without interpretive guidance, to interpreting results (23-42%), or providing therapeutic guidance comments to patient-facing healthcare teams (3-17%).

CONCLUSIONS

Current approaches to reporting molecular AMR test results from positive blood culture vary significantly across clinical laboratories. Providing interpretative comments with therapeutic guidance alongside results reported may assist clinicians who are not well-versed in genetic mechanisms of AMR. However, this is currently not being done in all clinical laboratories. Standardized strategies for AMR gene result reporting are needed.

[Rapid diagnosis of bacteremia by genomic identification]

Our objective was to make a focus on the methods for rapid diagnosis of bacteremia by genomic identification. We also aimed to evaluate the interest of using them in the laboratory practice. The different methods currently available have been presented according to their technologic approach. It is also possible to classify these methods according to the data provided, only bacterial and/or resistance gene identification or also bacterial susceptibility to antibiotics. In case of mono-microbial blood cultures, the performances recorded with these methods are very good as compared to the subcultures on agar media. Nevertheless, they are better for identifications (>90%) than for susceptibility to antibiotics (>80%). Numerous studies demonstrated the positive impact of these methods for decreasing the time necessary to the prescription of an appropriate antimicrobial treatment. However, it is noteworthy that an appropriate organization of the laboratory and a strategy of antimicrobial stewardship in the hospital are necessary. Concurrently, the impact on the patient outcome has not been clearly demonstrated. Lastly, few medico-economic studies have been reported. However, as these methods have a substantial cost, their utilization strategy must be economically viable.

A Closer Look at the Laboratory Impact of Utilizing ePlex Blood Culture Identification Panels: a Workflow Analysis Using Rapid Molecular Detection for Positive Blood Cultures

Rapid identification of pathogens is critical in bloodstream infections. We evaluated the diagnostic performance of the GenMark Dx ePlex blood culture identification (BCID) panels and the adoption of the ePlex system into the clinical laboratory workflow. Nonduplicate remnant specimens of positive blood cultures were prospectively tested using ePlex panels between January and March 2020. A total of 313 unique positive blood culture specimens were tested. The identified organisms consisted of 98 Gram-negative rods (GNR), 90 Gram-positive cocci (GPC) in clusters, 62 GPC in chains, 21 Gram-positive rods, and 20 yeasts; 22 organisms were off panel. The positive percent agreement was 100% across all organisms tested after discordancy resolution, while the negative percent agreement was 100% across all targets except Corynebacterium spp., where it was 99.7%. The ePlex BCID panels accurately detected 5 pan targets and 42 antimicrobial resistance gene markers, including 31 mecA, 4 vanA, 6 CTX-M, and 1 KPC gene. The median times to result were calculated as 2.5 h for Xpert MRSA/SA in GPC in clusters, 9.5 h for Accelerate Pheno (identification and susceptibility) in GNR, 6 h for peptide nucleic acid fluorescent in situ hybridization [PNA-FISH] in yeasts, 27 h for the latex agglutination test in S. aureus, 29 h for Lancefield serotyping in GPC in chains, and 29 h for Vitek-MS in GNR. In our laboratory, the ePlex panels could substantially reduce the time to result for bloodstream infection (BSI) caused by Streptococcus spp., Enterococcus spp., and Candida spp. The highly accurate ePlex panels can help streamline laboratory efficiency in the blood bench workflow, reducing the time to result for identification of BSI pathogens. IMPORTANCE Sepsis is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Rapid identification of the causative agent is of critical importance for the prompt initiation of the appropriate antibiotic treatment. In this study, we evaluated the diagnostic performance of the GenMark Dx ePlex blood culture identification (BCID) panels and their adoption into the clinical laboratory workflow. We prospectively tested 313 blood culture isolates and found that ePlex BCID panels had a positive percent agreement of 100% across all organisms tested after discordancy resolution. The negative percent agreement was 100% across all targets except Corynebacterium spp., where it was 99.7%. This new rapid technology (turnaround time of ~90 min) can help streamline laboratory efficiency in the blood bench workflow, reducing the time to result for identification of BSI pathogens. Adoption should be individualized based on the needs of the patient population and capabilities of the laboratory.

Multicenter Evaluation of the Acuitas ® AMR Gene Panel for Detection of an Extended Panel of Antimicrobial Resistance Genes among Bacterial Isolates

Background: The Acuitas® AMR Gene Panel is a qualitative, multiplex nucleic acid-based in vitro diagnostic test for detection and differentiation of 28 antimicrobial resistance (AMR) markers associated with not susceptible results (NS, i.e., intermediate or resistant) to one or more antimicrobial agents among cultured isolates of select Enterobacterales, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Enterococcus faecalis. Methods: This study was conducted at four sites and included testing of 1,224 de-identified stocks created from 584 retrospectively collected isolates and 83 prospectively collected clinical isolates. The Acuitas results were compared with a combined reference standard including whole genome sequencing, organism identification and phenotypic antimicrobial susceptibility testing. Results: Positive percent agreement (PPA) for FDA-cleared AMR targets ranged from 94.4% for MCR-1 to 100% for armA, CTX-M-2, DHA, IMP, OXA-9, SHV, vanA and VEB. The negative percent agreement (NPA) for the majority of targets was ≥99%, except for AAC, AAD, CMY-41, P. aeruginosa gyrA mutant, Sul1, Sul2 and TEM targets (range: 96.5% to 98.5%). Three AMR markers did not meet FDA inclusion criteria (GES, SPM & MCR-2). For each organism, 1 to 22 AMR targets met the minimum reportable PPA/NPA and correlated with ≥80% positive predictive value with associated NS results for at least one agent (i.e., the probability of an organism carrying an AMR marker testing NS to the associated agent). Conclusion: We demonstrate that the Acuitas® AMR Gene Panel is an accurate method to detect a broad array of AMR markers among cultured isolates. The AMR markers were further associated with expected NS results for specific agent-organism combinations.

A Multicenter Clinical Study To Demonstrate the Diagnostic Accuracy of the GenMark Dx ePlex Blood Culture Identification Gram-Negative Panel

Bacteremia can progress to septic shock and death without appropriate medical intervention. Increasing evidence supports the role of molecular diagnostic panels in reducing the clinical impact of these infections through rapid identification of the infecting organism and associated antimicrobial resistance genes. We report the results of a multicenter clinical study assessing the performance of the GenMark Dx ePlex investigational-use-only blood culture identification Gram-negative panel (BCID-GN), a rapid diagnostic assay for detection of bloodstream pathogens in positive blood culture (PBC) bottles. Prospective, retrospective, and contrived samples were tested. Results from the BCID-GN were compared to standard-of-care bacterial identification methods. Antimicrobial resistance genes (ARGs) were identified using PCR and sequence analysis. The final BCID-GN analysis included 2,444 PBC samples, of which 926 were clinical samples with negative Gram stain results. Of these, 109 samples had false-negative and/or -positive results, resulting in an overall sample accuracy of 88.2% (817/926). After discordant resolution, overall sample accuracy increased to 92.9% (860/926). Pre- and postdiscordant resolution sample accuracy excludes 37 Gram-negative organisms representing 20 uncommon genera, 10 Gram-positive organisms, and 1 Candida species present in 5% of samples that are not targeted by the BCID-GN. The overall weighted positive percent agreement (PPA), which averages the individual PPAs from the 27 targets (Gram-negative and ARG), was 94.9%. The limit of detection ranged from 10⁴ to 10⁷ CFU/ml, except for one strain of Fusobacterium necrophorum at 10⁸ CFU/ml.

Identification and Antibiotic Susceptibility Patterns of Clinical Blood Culture Isolates Not Identified by a Rapid Microarray Diagnostic System

The use of molecular-based diagnostic testing, such as the Luminex Verigene system, to rapidly identify the most common bacterial isolates from blood cultures is an important tool that reduces the duration of inappropriate antibiotics and decreases mortality. However, 5 to 15% of microorganisms recovered from blood culture are unable to be identified by the Verigene Gram-negative (BC-GN) or Gram-positive (BC-GP) assays. In this retrospective, observational study, we evaluate the identities and antimicrobial susceptibility patterns of 229 isolates that were not identified by either the Verigene BC-GN or BC-GP assay. The results presented here suggest that important, clinically relevant information about antimicrobial susceptibility patterns can still be inferred even when isolates are not identified by Verigene. We also examined changes in antibiotic use for patients with “unidentified” Verigene results at our institution and found that this subgroup represents an opportunity to optimize empirical antibiotic therapy.

IMPORTANCE Rapid diagnostic testing to identify bloodstream pathogens has arisen as an important tool both to ensure adequate antimicrobial therapy is given early and to aid in antimicrobial stewardship by allowing for more rapid deescalation of inappropriate antimicrobial therapy. However, there is a paucity of data regarding the significance of isolates that are not able to be identified by rapid diagnostic testing. In this study, we report the identification to the species level and antimicrobial susceptibilities among isolates that were not identified by one such rapid diagnostic platform, the Verigene system. This study provides important insight into how a strong understanding of the strengths and limitations of a given rapid diagnostic platform, coupled with insight into local antibiotic susceptibility patterns, can allow for more nuanced and thoughtful empirical antibiotic selection.

The Genotype-to-Phenotype Dilemma: How Should Laboratories Approach Discordant Susceptibility Results?

Traditional culture-based methods for identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) of bacteria take 2 to 3 days on average. Syndromic molecular diagnostic panels have revolutionized clinical microbiology laboratories as they can simultaneously identify an organism and detect some of the most significant antimicrobial resistance (AMR) genes directly from positive blood culture broth or from various specimen types (e.g., whole blood, cerebrospinal fluid, and respiratory specimens). The presence or absence of an AMR marker associated with a particular organism can be used to predict the phenotypic AST results to more rapidly guide therapy. Numerous studies have shown that genotypic susceptibility predictions by syndromic panels can improve patient outcomes. However, an important limitation of AMR marker detection to predict phenotype is the potential discrepancies that may arise upon performing phenotypic AST of the recovered organism in culture. The focus of this minireview is to address how clinical laboratories should interpret rapid molecular results from commercial platforms in relation to phenotypic AST. Stepwise approaches and solutions are provided to resolve discordant results between genotypic and phenotypic susceptibility results.

Advances in rapid diagnostics for bloodstream infections

Septicemia from bloodstream infections (BSI) is the second largest cause of inpatient mortality and the single most expensive condition for US hospitals to manage. There has been an explosive development of commercial diagnostic systems to accelerate the identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) of causative pathogens. Despite adoption of advanced technologies like matrix-assisted laser desorption imaging-time-of-flight mass spectrometry and multiplex polymerase chain reaction for rapid identification, clinical impact has been variable, in part due to the persistent need for conventional AST as well as prescriber understanding of these rapidly evolving platforms. Newer technologies are expanding on rapid detection of genotypic determinants of resistance, but only recently has rapid phenotypic AST been available. Yet, improved outcomes with rapid diagnostic platforms are still most evident in conjunction with active antimicrobial stewardship. This review will outline key advancements in rapid diagnostics for BSI and the role of antimicrobial stewardship in this new era.

Screening for Intestinal Carriage of Extended-spectrum Beta-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae in Critically Ill Patients: Expected Benefits and Evidence-based Controversies

The rising burden of intensive care unit (ICU)-acquired infections due to extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae (ESBL-E) strengthens the requirement for efficient prevention strategies. The detection of intestinal carriage of ESBL-E through active surveillance cultures (ASC) and the implementation of contact precautions (CP) in carriers are currently advocated in most high-income countries, to prevent cross-transmission and subsequent ESBL-E infections in critically-ill patients. Yet, recent studies have challenged the benefit of ASC and CP in controlling the spread of ESBL-E in ICUs with high compliance to standard hygiene precautions and no ongoing outbreak of ESBL-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae or Enterobacter spp. Besides, given their debated performance to positively predict which patients are at risk of ESBL-E infections, ASC results appear of limited value to rationalize the empirical use of carbapenems in the ICU, emphasizing the urgent need for novel anticipatory and diagnostic approaches. This Viewpoint article summarizes the available evidence on these issues.

Rapid microbial identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing to drive better patient care: an evolving scenario

Antimicrobial chemotherapy for septic patients begins with empirical therapy and can be subsequently revised when the results of microbiological testing become available. In recent years, a number of novel technologies for the microbiological diagnosis of sepsis have been developed that return results in a shorter timeframe compared with conventional diagnostic approaches. These novel technologies aid antimicrobial stewardship when treating septic patients by reducing the time to appropriate antimicrobial chemotherapy. Advantages and limitations of these technologies should be well understood upon their introduction in the diagnostic workflow. Increasingly popular DNA-based technologies primarily focus on the rapid identification of pathogens, but information on antimicrobial susceptibility is lacking or limited to a few clinically relevant resistance markers. Thus, DNA-based molecular techniques can complement conventional technologies but cannot replace them. On the other hand, a novel technology that provides both rapid identification of bacterial pathogens and a rapid phenotypic antibiogram with MIC values, and which starts from positive blood cultures, is a very promising approach for fast diagnosis of sepsis. To fully leverage the advantages offered by novel diagnostic technologies for sepsis requires a careful introduction into the laboratory workflow, following an evaluation by a health technology assessment approach. It may also require some reshaping of the workflow (e.g. to process the positive blood cultures on a 24/7 schedule) and of the laboratory organization (e.g. by creating a laboratory subsection for fast diagnosis of sepsis).

Rapid molecular tests for detection of antimicrobial resistance determinants in Gram-negative organisms from positive blood cultures: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Timely detection of antimicrobial (cephalosporin/carbapenem) resistance (AMR) determinants is crucial to the clinical management of bloodstream infections caused by Gram-negative bacteria (GNB).

OBJECTIVES

To review and meta-analyse the evidence for using commercially available molecular tests for the direct detection of AMR determinants in GNB-positive blood cultures (PBCs).

DATA SOURCES

PubMed, Scopus and ISI Web of Knowledge.

STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

Clinical studies evaluating the performance of two major commercial systems, namely the Verigene® and FilmArray® systems, for rapid testing of GNB-PBCs, in comparison with the phenotypic or genotypic methods performed on GNB-PBC isolates.

METHODS

Literature search according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses criteria and, for meta-analysis of sensitivity and specificity of both systems, bivariate random-effects model.

RESULTS

Twenty studies were identified (3310 isolates) from 2006 to 2019. Nine studies were conducted in East Asia. In 15 studies using phenotypic comparators (1930 isolates), 1014 (52.5%) isolates were Escherichia coli, and 287 (14.9%) of all the isolates displayed AMR phenotypes. In five studies using genotypic comparators (1380 isolates), 585 (42.4%) were E. coli, and 100 (7.2%) of all the isolates displayed AMR genotypes. Pooled sensitivity and specificity estimates for detection of AMR determinants by the Verigene (i.e. CTX-M, IMP, KPC, NDM, OXA and VIM) and/or FilmArray (i.e. KPC) systems were 85.3% (95% CI 79.9%-89.4%) and 99.1% (95% CI 98.2%-99.5%), respectively, across the 15 studies, and 95.5% (95% CI 89.2%-98.2%) and 99.7% (95% CI 99.1%-99.9%), respectively, across the five studies.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings show that the Verigene and FilmArray systems may be a valid adjunct to the conventional microbiology (phenotypic or genotypic) methods used to identify AMR in GNBs. The FilmArray system detects only one AMR genotype, namely KPC, limiting its use. Both Verigene and FilmArray systems can miss important cephalosporin/carbapenem resistance phenotypes in a minority of cases. However, the sensitivity and specificity of both systems render them valuable clinical tools in timely identification of resistant isolates. Further studies will establish the prominence of such rapid diagnostics as standard of care in individuals with bloodstream infections.

New Microbiological Techniques in the Diagnosis of Bloodstream Infections

BACKGROUND

When a bloodstream infection is suspected, the preliminary and definitive results of culture-based microbiological testing arrive too late to have any influence on the initial choice of empirical antibiotic treatment.

METHODS

This review is based on pertinent publications retrieved by a selective search of the literature and on the authors' clinical and scientific experience.

RESULTS

A number of technical advances now enable more rapid microbiological diagnosis of bloodstream infections. DNA- based techniques for the direct detection of pathogenic organisms in whole blood have not yet become established in routine use because of various limitations. On the other hand, matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization-time of flight (MALDI-TOF) mass spectrometry (MS) has become available for routine use in clinical laboratories and has markedly shortened the time to diagnosis after blood samples that have been cultured in automated blood-culture systems turn positive. Further developments of this technique now enable it to be used directly for blood cultures that have been flagged positive, as well as for subcultures that have been incubated for only a short time on a solid nutrient medium. The microbial biomass of the subculture can also be used in parallel for more rapid susceptibility testing with conventional methods, or, in future, with MALDI-TOF MS.

CONCLUSION

The potential of all of these new techniques will only be realizable in practice if they are optimally embedded in the diagnostic process and if sufficient attention is paid to pre-analytical issues, particularly storage and transport times.

Rapid Diagnostics for Blood Cultures: Supporting Decisions for Antimicrobial Therapy and Value-Based Care

Bacteremia and sepsis are critically important syndromes with high mortality, morbidity, and associated costs. Bloodstream infections and sepsis are among the top causes of mortality in the US, with >600 deaths each day. Most septic patients can be found in emergency medicine departments or critical care units, settings in which rapid administration of targeted antibiotic therapy can reduce mortality. Unfortunately, routine blood cultures are not rapid enough to aid in the decision of therapeutic intervention at the onset of bacteremia. As a result, empiric, broad-spectrum treatment is common-a costly approach that may fail to target the correct microbe effectively, may inadvertently harm patients via antimicrobial toxicity, and may contribute to the evolution of drug-resistant microbes. To overcome these challenges, laboratorians must understand the complexity of diagnosing and treating septic patients, focus on creating algorithms that rapidly support decisions for targeted antibiotic therapy, and synergize with existing emergency department and critical care clinical practices put forth in the Surviving Sepsis Guidelines.

Rapid diagnostics for bloodstream infections: A primer for infection preventionists

Accurate and rapid antimicrobial susceptibility testing with pathogen identification in bloodstream infections is critical to life results for early sepsis intervention. Advancements in rapid diagnostics have shortened the time to results from days to hours and have had positive effects on clinical outcomes and on efforts to combat antimicrobial resistance when paired with robust antimicrobial stewardship programs. This article provides infection preventionists with a working knowledge of available rapid diagnostics for bloodstream infections.

A 5-year study of the performance of the Verigene Gram-positive blood culture panel in a pediatric hospital

High accuracy of direct from positive blood culture molecular panels is imperative, particularly for the detection of resistance determinants as it allows for antimicrobial optimization prior to conventional susceptibility testing. In this study, we provide extensive data since implementation of the Verigene Gram-positive blood culture panel (BC-GP) in 2013. Within 5 years, 1636 blood culture bottles positive for a Gram-positive organism were tested on the BC-GP panel. The BC-GP panel identified 1520 Gram-positive organisms in 1636 (92.9%) blood cultures tested. For positive blood cultures, we observed 96.4% (806/834) concordance to the species level. Compared with conventional antimicrobial susceptibility testing, the positive percent agreement (PPA) of methicillin-resistant SA (MRSA) (50) and methicillin-resistant SE (MRSE) (365) was 100%. The mecA gene was detected in two methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) and one methicillin-susceptible S. epidermidis (MSSE) with a negative percent agreement (NPA) of 99.1% (221/223) and 99.2% (120/121), respectively. The PPA and NPA for vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium (VRE) was 100%. The BC-GP panel demonstrated excellent performance and clinicians can confidently de-escalate antimicrobial therapy in the absence of mecA and vanA/B gene.

Current antimicrobial susceptibility testing for beta-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae in clinical settings

The worldwide prevalence of beta-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae (BL-E) is increasing. Bacterial infections involving ESBLs can be more difficult to treat because of antibiotic resistance, as there are fewer effective antibiotics left to be used. Moreover, treatment failure is often observed. Thus, quick and accurate identification of β-lactamases is imperative to minimize it. This review article describes most commonly used phenotypic techniques and molecular methods for the detection of ESBLs, acquired AmpC β-lactamases, and carbapenemases produced by Enterobacteriaceae. Phenotypic detection tests remain useful and relevant in clinical laboratories while molecular diagnostic methods are less affordable, more technically demanding, and not standardized. Molecular methods could be used to speed up results of bacterial antibiotic resistance or to clarify the results of phenotypic β-lactamases confirmation tests.

Evaluation of the Accelerate Pheno™ system for rapid identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Gram-negative bacteria in bloodstream infections

Identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) are critical steps in the management of bloodstream infections. Our objective was to evaluate the performance of the Accelerate Pheno™ System, CE v1.2 software, for identification and AST of Gram-negative pathogens from positive blood culture bottles. A total of 104 bottles positive for Gram-negative bacteria collected from inpatients throughout our institution were randomly selected after Gram staining. The time-to-identification and AST results, and the raw AST results obtained by the Accelerate Pheno™ system and routine techniques (MALDI-TOF MS and VITEK®2, EUCAST guidelines) were compared. Any discrepant AST result was tested by microdilution. The Pheno™ significantly improved turn-around times for identification (5.3 versus 23.7 h; p < 0.0001) and AST (10.7 versus 35.1 h; p < 0.0001). Complete agreement between the Accelerate Pheno™ system and the MALDI-TOF MS for identification was observed for 96.2% of samples; it was 99% (98/99) for monomicrobial samples versus 40% (3/5) for polymicrobial ones. The overall categorical agreement for AST was 93.7%; it was notably decreased for beta-lactams (cefepime 84.4%, piperacillin-tazobactam 86.5%, ceftazidime 87.6%) or Pseudomonas aeruginosa (71.9%; with cefepime 33.3%, piperacillin-tazobactam 77.8%, ceftazidime 0%). Analysis of discrepant results found impaired performance of the Accelerate Pheno™ system for beta-lactams (except cefepime) in Enterobacteriales (six very major errors) and poor performance in P. aeruginosa. The Accelerate Pheno™ system significantly improved the turn-around times for bloodstream infection diagnosis. Nonetheless, improvements in the analysis of polymicrobial samples and in AST algorithms, notably beta-lactam testing in both P. aeruginosa and Enterobacteriales, are required for implementation in routine workflow.

PCR-based tests for the early diagnosis of sepsis. Where do we stand?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Bloodstream infections are a major cause of hospital and ICU admission with high morbidity and mortality; however, early and targeted antimicrobial therapy reduces mortality in high-risk patients. This article focuses on the diagnosis of bloodstream infections by PCR-based approaches at an early stage to enable prompt treatment and prevent organ dysfunction.

RECENT FINDINGS

PCR systems offering highly multiplexed targeting of bacterial and/or fungal pathogens (in whole blood) offer the best opportunity for clinical impact, as informed decisions can be made within 4-8 h of the blood draw. Although more rapid, these systems are typically associated with lower sensitivity and specificity than postculture detection methods which rely on microbial growth. Additionally, unlike postculture methods, detection directly from blood is not prone to misleading results because of concurrent (or previous) therapy, which limit clinical relevance.

SUMMARY

Rapid and accurate identification of the cause of sepsis is essential in improving patient outcomes. Early identification of these pathogens by nucleic acid detection assays directly from blood samples remains key to achieving this, particularly if taken at the time of presentation. Selection of the most suitable PCR system is typically influenced by local epidemiology and by the resources of the testing laboratory.

An Automated Sample Preparation Instrument to Accelerate Positive Blood Cultures Microbial Identification by MALDI-TOF Mass Spectrometry (Vitek®MS)

Sepsis is the leading cause of death among patients in intensive care units (ICUs) requiring an early diagnosis to introduce efficient therapeutic intervention. Rapid identification (ID) of a causative pathogen is key to guide directed antimicrobial selection and was recently shown to reduce hospitalization length in ICUs. Direct processing of positive blood cultures by MALDI-TOF MS technology is one of the several currently available tools used to generate rapid microbial ID. However, all recently published protocols are still manual and time consuming, requiring dedicated technician availability and specific strategies for batch processing. We present here a new prototype instrument for automated preparation of Vitek^®MS slides directly from positive blood culture broth based on an “all-in-one” extraction strip. This bench top instrument was evaluated on 111 and 22 organisms processed using artificially inoculated blood culture bottles in the BacT/ALERT^® 3D (SA/SN blood culture bottles) or the BacT/ALERT Virtuo^TM system (FA/FN Plus bottles), respectively. Overall, this new preparation station provided reliable and accurate Vitek MS species-level identification of 87% (Gram-negative bacteria = 85%, Gram-positive bacteria = 88%, and yeast = 100%) when used with BacT/ALERT^® 3D and of 84% (Gram-negative bacteria = 86%, Gram-positive bacteria = 86%, and yeast = 75%) with Virtuo^® instruments, respectively. The prototype was then evaluated in a clinical microbiology laboratory on 102 clinical blood culture bottles and compared to routine laboratory ID procedures. Overall, the correlation of ID on monomicrobial bottles was 83% (Gram-negative bacteria = 89%, Gram-positive bacteria = 79%, and yeast = 78%), demonstrating roughly equivalent performance between manual and automatized extraction methods. This prototype instrument exhibited a high level of performance regardless of bottle type or BacT/ALERT system. Furthermore, blood culture workflow could potentially be improved by converting direct ID of positive blood cultures from a batch-based to real-time and “on-demand” process.

Molecular diagnosis of antimicrobial resistance in Escherichia coli

INTRODUCTION

Antimicrobial resistance is a growing global public health threat. The complexities of antimicrobial resistance in gram-negative bacteria such as Escherichia coli pose significant diagnostic and therapeutic challenges. Molecular diagnostics are emerging in this field. Areas covered: The authors review the clinical importance of pathogenic E. coli and discuss the mechanisms of resistance to common antibiotics used to treat these infections. We review the literature on antimicrobial susceptibility testing and discuss the current state of phenotypic as well as molecular methodologies. Clinical vignettes are presented to highlight how molecular diagnostics may be used for patient care. Expert commentary: The future use of molecular diagnostics for detection of antimicrobial resistance will be tailored to the context, whether hospital epidemiology, infection control, antibiotic stewardship, or clinical care. Further clinical research is needed to understand how to best apply molecular diagnostics to these settings.

Parallel Evaluation of the MALDI Sepsityper and Verigene BC-GN Assays for Rapid Identification of Gram-Negative Bacilli from Positive Blood Cultures

Rapid identification of microorganisms from positive blood cultures has improved clinical management and antimicrobial stewardship. The advent of matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) has reduced the time to identification of cultured isolates and is now often the definitive method used in the clinical microbiology laboratory. The commercial in vitro diagnostic MALDI Sepsityper (Sepsityper) kit has the potential for standardization and clinical routine use for the rapid identification of a broad range of bacteria from positive blood cultures. In this study, we performed a parallel evaluation of the Sepsityper (Bruker Daltonics, Billerica, MA) and the Verigene BC-GN (BC-GN) assays (Nanosphere, Inc., Northfield, IL) for the identification of Gram-negative bacilli. A total of 210 Bactec bottles demonstrating Gram-negative bacilli were prospectively enrolled for this study. Among these, 200 monomicrobial cultures were included in the comparative analysis. For monomicrobial cultures, the BC-GN detected 85% (170/200) compared to that detected by routine culture while the Sepsityper detected 94% (188/200) and 91% (181/200) to the genus and species levels, respectively. Comparable positive percentage agreement and negative percentage agreement were observed between the Sepsityper (96.5% and 98.8%, respectively) and the BC-GN (99.4% and 99.8%, respectively) when only (n = 170, 85%) organisms targeted by the latter test were included in the analysis. In conclusion, the two methods evaluated in this study showed excellent performance characteristics for the identification of Gram-negative bacilli commonly isolated from blood cultures. The Sepsityper showed a broader identification range capability that may further improve clinical management and antimicrobial stewardship in patients with less frequent Gram-negative bacilli bloodstream infections.

Potential Impact of Rapid Blood Culture Testing for Gram-Positive Bacteremia in Japan with the Verigene Gram-Positive Blood Culture Test

Background. Early detection of Gram-positive bacteremia and timely appropriate antimicrobial therapy are required for decreasing patient mortality. The purpose of our study was to evaluate the performance of the Verigene Gram-positive blood culture assay (BC-GP) in two special healthcare settings and determine the potential impact of rapid blood culture testing for Gram-positive bacteremia within the Japanese healthcare delivery system. Furthermore, the study included simulated blood cultures, which included a library of well-characterized methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) isolates reflecting different geographical regions in Japan. Methods. A total 347 BC-GP assays were performed on clinical and simulated blood cultures. BC-GP results were compared to results obtained by reference methods for genus/species identification and detection of resistance genes using molecular and MALDI-TOF MS methodologies. Results. For identification and detection of resistance genes at two clinical sites and simulated blood cultures, overall concordance of BC-GP with reference methods was 327/347 (94%). The time for identification and antimicrobial resistance detection by BC-GP was significantly shorter compared to routine testing especially at the cardiology hospital, which does not offer clinical microbiology services on weekends and holidays. Conclusion. BC-GP generated accurate identification and detection of resistance markers compared with routine laboratory methods for Gram-positive organisms in specialized clinical settings providing more rapid results than current routine testing.

The new frontier of diagnostics: Molecular assays and their role in infection prevention and control

Recent advances in technology over the last decade have propelled the microbiology laboratory into a pivotal role in infection prevention and control. The rapid adaptation of molecular technologies to the field of clinical microbiology now greatly influences infectious disease management and significantly impacts infection control practices. This review discusses recent developments in molecular techniques in the diagnosis of infectious diseases. It describes the basic concepts of molecular assays, discusses their advantages and limitations, and characterizes currently available commercial assays with respect to cost, interpretive requirements, and clinical utility.

Clinical Impact of Laboratory Implementation of Verigene BC-GN Microarray-Based Assay for Detection of Gram-Negative Bacteria in Positive Blood Cultures

Gram-negative bacteremia is highly fatal, and hospitalizations due to sepsis have been increasing worldwide. Molecular tests that supplement Gram stain results from positive blood cultures provide specific organism information to potentially guide therapy, but more clinical data on their real-world impact are still needed. We retrospectively reviewed cases of Gram-negative bacteremia in hospitalized patients over a 6-month period before (n = 98) and over a 6-month period after (n = 97) the implementation of a microarray-based early identification and resistance marker detection system (Verigene BC-GN; Nanosphere) while antimicrobial stewardship practices remained constant. Patient demographics, time to organism identification, time to effective antimicrobial therapy, and other key clinical parameters were compared. The two groups did not differ statistically with regard to comorbid conditions, sources of bacteremia, or numbers of intensive care unit (ICU) admissions, active use of immunosuppressive therapy, neutropenia, or bacteremia due to multidrug-resistant organisms. The BC-GN panel yielded an identification in 87% of Gram-negative cultures and was accurate in 95/97 (98%) of the cases compared to results using conventional culture. Organism identifications were achieved more quickly post-microarray implementation (mean, 10.9 h versus 37.9 h; P < 0.001). Length of ICU stay, 30-day mortality, and mortality associated with multidrug-resistant organisms were significantly lower in the postintervention group (P < 0.05). More rapid implementation of effective therapy was statistically significant for postintervention cases of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing organisms (P = 0.049) but not overall (P = 0.12). The Verigene BC-GN assay is a valuable addition for the early identification of Gram-negative organisms that cause bloodstream infections and can significantly impact patient care, particularly when resistance markers are detected.