1
|
Papadopoulos NT, De Meyer M, Terblanche JS, Kriticos DJ. Fruit Flies: Challenges and Opportunities to Stem the Tide of Global Invasions. ANNUAL REVIEW OF ENTOMOLOGY 2024; 69:355-373. [PMID: 37758223 DOI: 10.1146/annurev-ento-022723-103200] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/03/2023]
Abstract
Global trade in fresh fruit and vegetables, intensification of human mobility, and climate change facilitate fruit fly (Diptera: Tephritidae) invasions. Life-history traits, environmental stress response, dispersal stress, and novel genetic admixtures contribute to their establishment and spread. Tephritids are among the most frequently intercepted taxa at ports of entry. In some countries, supported by the rules-based trade framework, a remarkable amount of biosecurity effort is being arrayed against the range expansion of tephritids. Despite this effort, fruit flies continue to arrive in new jurisdictions, sometimes triggering expensive eradication responses. Surprisingly, scant attention has been paid to biosecurity in the recent discourse about new multilateral trade agreements. Much of the available literature on managing tephritid invasions is focused on a limited number of charismatic (historically high-profile) species, and the generality of many patterns remains speculative.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nikos T Papadopoulos
- Department of Agriculture Crop Production and Rural Environment, University of Thessaly, Volos, Greece;
| | - Marc De Meyer
- Department of Biology, Royal Museum for Central Africa, Tervuren, Belgium;
| | - John S Terblanche
- Department of Conservation Ecology & Entomology, Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch, South Africa;
| | - Darren J Kriticos
- Cervantes Agritech, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia;
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Zhang B, DeAngelis DL. An overview of agent-based models in plant biology and ecology. ANNALS OF BOTANY 2020; 126:539-557. [PMID: 32173742 PMCID: PMC7489105 DOI: 10.1093/aob/mcaa043] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/28/2019] [Accepted: 03/12/2020] [Indexed: 05/22/2023]
Abstract
Agent-based modelling (ABM) has become an established methodology in many areas of biology, ranging from the cellular to the ecological population and community levels. In plant science, two different scales have predominated in their use of ABM. One is the scale of populations and communities, through the modelling of collections of agents representing individual plants, interacting with each other and with the environment. The other is the scale of the individual plant, through the modelling, by functional-structural plant models (FSPMs), of agents representing plant building blocks, or metamers, to describe the development of plant architecture and functions within individual plants. The purpose of this review is to show key results and parallels in ABM for growth, mortality, carbon allocation, competition and reproduction across the scales from the plant organ to populations and communities on a range of spatial scales to the whole landscape. Several areas of application of ABMs are reviewed, showing that some issues are addressed by both population-level ABMs and FSPMs. Continued increase in the relevance of ABM to environmental science and management will be helped by greater integration of ABMs across these two scales.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bo Zhang
- Department of Environmental Science and Policy, University of California, Davis, CA, USA
| | - Donald L DeAngelis
- U. S. Geological Survey, Wetland and Aquatic Research Center, Davie, FL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Louarn G, Song Y. Two decades of functional-structural plant modelling: now addressing fundamental questions in systems biology and predictive ecology. ANNALS OF BOTANY 2020; 126:501-509. [PMID: 32725187 PMCID: PMC7489058 DOI: 10.1093/aob/mcaa143] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/24/2020] [Accepted: 07/25/2020] [Indexed: 05/16/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Functional-structural plant models (FSPMs) explore and integrate relationships between a plant's structure and processes that underlie its growth and development. In the last 20 years, scientists interested in functional-structural plant modelling have expanded greatly the range of topics covered and now handle dynamical models of growth and development occurring from the microscopic scale, and involving cell division in plant meristems, to the macroscopic scales of whole plants and plant communities. SCOPE The FSPM approach occupies a central position in plant science; it is at the crossroads of fundamental questions in systems biology and predictive ecology. This special issue of Annals of Botany features selected papers on critical areas covered by FSPMs and examples of comprehensive models that are used to solve theoretical and applied questions, ranging from developmental biology to plant phenotyping and management of plants for agronomic purposes. Altogether, they offer an opportunity to assess the progress, gaps and bottlenecks along the research path originally foreseen for FSPMs two decades ago. This review also allows discussion of current challenges of FSPMs regarding (1) integration of multidisciplinary knowledge, (2) methods for handling complex models, (3) standards to achieve interoperability and greater genericity and (4) understanding of plant functioning across scales. CONCLUSIONS This approach has demonstrated considerable progress, but has yet to reach its full potential in terms of integration and heuristic knowledge production. The research agenda of functional-structural plant modellers in the coming years should place a greater emphasis on explaining robust emergent patterns, and on the causes of possible deviation from it. Modelling such patterns could indeed fuel both generic integration across scales and transdisciplinary transfer. In particular, it could be beneficial to emergent fields of research such as model-assisted phenotyping and predictive ecology in managed ecosystems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Youhong Song
- Anhui Agricultural University, School of Agronomy, Hefei, Anhui Province, PR China
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Wang M, White N, Grimm V, Hofman H, Doley D, Thorp G, Cribb B, Wherritt E, Han L, Wilkie J, Hanan J. Pattern-oriented modelling as a novel way to verify and validate functional-structural plant models: a demonstration with the annual growth module of avocado. ANNALS OF BOTANY 2018; 121:941-959. [PMID: 29425285 PMCID: PMC5906917 DOI: 10.1093/aob/mcx187] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2017] [Accepted: 11/24/2017] [Indexed: 05/12/2023]
Abstract
Background and Aims Functional-structural plant (FSP) models have been widely used to understand the complex interactions between plant architecture and underlying developmental mechanisms. However, to obtain evidence that a model captures these mechanisms correctly, a clear distinction must be made between model outputs used for calibration and thus verification, and outputs used for validation. In pattern-oriented modelling (POM), multiple verification patterns are used as filters for rejecting unrealistic model structures and parameter combinations, while a second, independent set of patterns is used for validation. Methods To test the potential of POM for FSP modelling, a model of avocado (Persea americana 'Hass') was developed. The model of shoot growth is based on a conceptual model, the annual growth module (AGM), and simulates photosynthesis and adaptive carbon allocation at the organ level. The model was first calibrated using a set of observed patterns from a published article. Then, for validation, model predictions were compared with a different set of empirical patterns from various field studies that were not used for calibration. Key Results After calibration, our model simultaneously reproduced multiple observed architectural patterns. The model then successfully predicted, without further calibration, the validation patterns. The model supports the hypothesis that carbon allocation can be modelled as being dependent on current organ biomass and sink strength of each organ type, and also predicted the observed developmental timing of the leaf sink-source transition stage. Conclusions These findings suggest that POM can help to improve the 'structural realism' of FSP models, i.e. the likelihood that a model reproduces observed patterns for the right reasons. Structural realism increases predictive power so that the response of an AGM to changing environmental conditions can be predicted. Accordingly, our FSP model provides a better but still parsimonious understanding of the mechanisms underlying known patterns of AGM growth.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ming Wang
- The University of Queensland, Queensland Alliance for Agriculture and Food Innovation (QAAFI), Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Neil White
- The University of Queensland, Queensland Alliance for Agriculture and Food Innovation (QAAFI), Brisbane, QLD, Australia
- Department of Agriculture and Fisheries, Toowoomba, QLD, Australia
| | - Volker Grimm
- Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research-UFZ, Department of Ecological Modelling, Leipzig, Germany
- University of Potsdam, Institute for Biochemistry and Biology, Potsdam, Germany
- German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle-Jena-Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Helen Hofman
- Department of Agriculture and Fisheries, Bundaberg Research Facility, Kalkie, QLD, Australia
| | - David Doley
- The University of Queensland, Sustainable Minerals Institute, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Grant Thorp
- Plant & Food Research Australia Pty Ltd, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Bronwen Cribb
- The University of Queensland, Centre for Microscopy and Microanalysis, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
- The University of Queensland, School of Biological Sciences, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Ella Wherritt
- The University of Queensland, Queensland Alliance for Agriculture and Food Innovation (QAAFI), Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Liqi Han
- The University of Queensland, Queensland Alliance for Agriculture and Food Innovation (QAAFI), Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - John Wilkie
- German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle-Jena-Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Jim Hanan
- The University of Queensland, Queensland Alliance for Agriculture and Food Innovation (QAAFI), Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Mathematical and Computational Modeling in Complex Biological Systems. BIOMED RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL 2017; 2017:5958321. [PMID: 28386558 PMCID: PMC5366773 DOI: 10.1155/2017/5958321] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/16/2016] [Revised: 12/20/2016] [Accepted: 01/16/2017] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
The biological process and molecular functions involved in the cancer progression remain difficult to understand for biologists and clinical doctors. Recent developments in high-throughput technologies urge the systems biology to achieve more precise models for complex diseases. Computational and mathematical models are gradually being used to help us understand the omics data produced by high-throughput experimental techniques. The use of computational models in systems biology allows us to explore the pathogenesis of complex diseases, improve our understanding of the latent molecular mechanisms, and promote treatment strategy optimization and new drug discovery. Currently, it is urgent to bridge the gap between the developments of high-throughput technologies and systemic modeling of the biological process in cancer research. In this review, we firstly studied several typical mathematical modeling approaches of biological systems in different scales and deeply analyzed their characteristics, advantages, applications, and limitations. Next, three potential research directions in systems modeling were summarized. To conclude, this review provides an update of important solutions using computational modeling approaches in systems biology.
Collapse
|