Strict Selection Alone of Patients Undergoing Liver Transplantation for Hilar Cholangiocarcinoma Is Associated with Improved Survival

Liver transplantation for primary and secondary liver tumors: Patient-level meta-analyses compared to UNOS conventional indications

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Liver transplant (LT) for transplant oncology (TO) indications is being slowly adopted worldwide and has been recommended to be incorporated cautiously due to concerns about mid-long-term survival and its impact on the waiting list.

APPROACH AND RESULTS

We conducted 4 systematic reviews of all series on TO indications (intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma and perihilar cholangiocarcinoma [phCC]) and liver metastases from neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) and colorectal cancer (CRLM) and compared them using patient-level meta-analyses to data obtained from the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) database considering conventional daily-practice indications. Secondary analyses were done for specific selection criteria (Mayo-like protocols for phCC, SECA-2 for CRLM, and Milan criteria for NET). A total of 112,014 LT were analyzed from 2005 to 2020 from the UNOS databases and compared with 345, 721, 494, and 103 patients obtained from meta-analyses on intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma and phCC, and liver metastases from NET and CRLM, respectively. Five-year overall survival was 53.3%, 56.4%, 68.6%, and 53.8%, respectively. In Mantel-Cox one-to-one comparisons, survival of TO indications was superior to combined LT, second, and third LT and not statistically significantly different from LT in recipients >70 years and high BMI.

CONCLUSIONS

Liver transplantation for TO indications has adequate 5-year survival rates, mostly when performed under the selection criteria available in the literature (Mayo-like protocols for phCC, SECA-2 for CRLM, and Milan for NET). Despite concerns about its impact on the waiting list, some other LT indications are being performed with lower survival rates. These oncological patients should be given the opportunity to have a definitive curative therapy within validated criteria.

Revisiting resectability of biliary tract cancers, in the triplet drug therapy era with immune checkpoint inhibitors

Biliary tract cancers (BTCs) include intrahepatic, perihilar, distal cholangiocarcinoma, gallbladder cancer, and sometimes papillary Vater cancer. The incidence of BTCs varies worldwide (0.3-85.0/100,000 population). In Japan, the incidence is lowest, but it is increasing (22,000 cases/ year). The 5-year overall survival (OS) in patients with localized BTC is approximately 60%, which is better than that in liver or pancreatic cancer, but is < 5% in patients with metastatic cancers. Surgery requires liver and pancreas surgery with vascular reconstruction, and is associated with a high perioperative mortality rate (> 2%) relative to other cancer surgeries (< 1%). As an adjuvant therapy, fluorouracil prodrugs are effective for improving OS (hazard ratio [HR] 0.69-0.81); however, in patients who receive major hepatectomy, the completion rate is reportedly low (60%). Since 2010, gemcitabine + cisplatin (GC) has become the first-line therapy for unresectable lesions. Subsequently, in 2023-2024 three triplet regimens were reported: GC + S-1(tegafur-gimeracil-oteracil), GC + durvalumab (an anti-PD-L1 antibody), and GC + pembrolizumab (an anti-PD-1 antibody). HRs for OS were 0.79-0.83, objective response rates were 27-42% (GC, 15-29%), and tumor control rates were 75-85% (GC, 62-83%) with small increases in adverse events. In this review, considering the eligibility criteria of currently ongoing neoadjuvant studies, we report two borderline resectable cases with a discussion on resectability. Owing to the high-risk nature of the surgery and to avoid early recurrence due to subclinical metastasis during postoperative recovery, these three triplet regimens for unresectable tumors may change the concept of resectability in BTC.

The Italian experience on liver transplantation for unresectable peri-hilar cholangiocarcinoma: a national survey and future perspectives

Liver transplantation (LT) was considered an ineffective treatment for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (pCCA) until the successful experience of the Mayo Clinic, proposing a protocol with strict inclusion criteria and neoadjuvant radio-chemotherapy. Since 2015, pCCA is considered an indication for LT in Italy only in the context of controlled prospective studies. We performed a survey among the 22 Italian Liver Transplant Centers to assess the results of LT for pCCA. Eight centers reported 53 cases from 1986 to 2021 (Bologna 12, Padova 10, Niguarda 10, Milano Tumori 8, Torino 5, Pisa 4, Ancona 2, Modena 2). Patients were divided according to whether they recieved neoadjuvant radio-chemotherapy (Group 1, 25 cases) or not (Group 2, 28 cases). Eleven patients were transplanted without neoadjuvant treatment after 2015. Overall survival at 1, 3 and 5 years was 83.8%, 56.6% and 50.6% in Group 1 and 72.4%, 41.4% and 35.5% in Gropu 2 (p = 0.13). Recurrence-free survival at 1, 3, and 5 years was 91.2%, 61.1% and 47.2% in Group 1 and 58.2%, 42.2%, and 36.1% in Group 2 (p = 0.16). A competing risk regression analysis showed a 5-year risk of cancer-related death of 19% for patients in Group 1 against 62.3% in Group 2, with a hazard ratio of 0.31 (95%CI [0.10-0.98], p 0.047). This survey promoted a discussion about the limitations of the Mayo protocol and set the basis for the adoption of a new nationwide protocol (LITHALICA-NCT06125769), having the same inclusion criteria but proposing standard of care chemotherapy as neoadjuvant regimen.

Immunosuppression in adult liver transplant recipients: a 2024 update from the Italian Liver Transplant Working Group

PURPOSE

Advances in surgical procedures and immunosuppressive therapies have considerably improved the outcomes of patients who have undergone liver transplantation in the past few decades. In 2020, the Italian Liver Transplant Working Group published practice-oriented algorithms for immunosuppressive therapy (IT) in adult liver transplant (LT) recipients. Due to the rapidly evolving LT field, regular updates to the recommendations are required. This review presents a consensus- and evidence-based update of the 2020 recommendations.

METHODS

The Italian Liver Transplant Working Group set out to address new IT issues, which were discussed based on supporting literature and the specialists' personal experiences. The panel deliberated on and graded each statement before consensus was reached.

RESULTS

A series of consensus statements were formulated and finalized on: (i) oncologic indications for LT; (ii) management of chronic LT rejection; (iii) combined liver-kidney transplantation; (iv) immunosuppression for transplantation with an organ donated after circulatory death; (v) transplantation in the presence of frailty and sarcopenia; and (vi) ABO blood group incompatibility between donor and recipient. Algorithms were updated in the following LT groups: standard patients, critical patients, oncology patients, patients with specific etiology, and patients at high immunologic risk. A steroid-free approach was generally recommended, except for patients with autoimmune liver disease and those at high immunologic risk.

CONCLUSION

The updated consensus- and evidence-based 2024 recommendations for immunosuppression regimens in adult patients with ABO-compatible LT address a range of clinical variables that should be considered to optimize the choice of the immunosuppression treatment in clinical practice in Italy.

Role of sex in liver tumor occurrence and clinical outcomes: A comprehensive review

Clinical research on sex-based differences in the manifestations, pathophysiology, and prevalence of several diseases, including those affecting the liver, has expanded considerably in recent years. Increasing evidence suggests that liver diseases develop, progress, and respond to treatment differently depending on the sex. These observations support the concept that the liver is a sexually dimorphic organ in which estrogen and androgen receptors are present, which results in disparities between men and women in liver gene expression patterns, immune responses, and the progression of liver damage, including the propensity to develop liver malignancies. Sex hormones play protective or deleterious roles depending on the patient's sex, the severity of the underlying disease, and the nature of precipitating factors. Moreover, obesity, alcohol consumption, and active smoking, as well as social determinants of liver diseases leading to sex-related inequalities, may interact strongly with hormone-related mechanisms of liver damage. Drug-induced liver injury, viral hepatitis, and metabolic liver diseases are influenced by the status of sex hormones. Available data on the roles of sex hormones and gender differences in liver tumor occurrence and clinical outcomes are conflicting. Here, we critically review the main gender-based differences in the molecular mechanisms associated with liver carcinogenesis and the prevalence, prognosis, and treatment of primary and metastatic liver tumors.

National guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of hilar cholangiocarcinoma

A consensus meeting of national experts from all major national hepatobiliary centres in the country was held on May 26, 2023, at the Pakistan Kidney and Liver Institute & Research Centre (PKLI & RC) after initial consultations with the experts. The Pakistan Society for the Study of Liver Diseases (PSSLD) and PKLI & RC jointly organised this meeting. This effort was based on a comprehensive literature review to establish national practice guidelines for hilar cholangiocarcinoma (hCCA). The consensus was that hCCA is a complex disease and requires a multidisciplinary team approach to best manage these patients. This coordinated effort can minimise delays and give patients a chance for curative treatment and effective palliation. The diagnostic and staging workup includes high-quality computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography. Brush cytology or biopsy utilizing endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography is a mainstay for diagnosis. However, histopathologic confirmation is not always required before resection. Endoscopic ultrasound with fine needle aspiration of regional lymph nodes and positron emission tomography scan are valuable adjuncts for staging. The only curative treatment is the surgical resection of the biliary tree based on the Bismuth-Corlette classification. Selected patients with unresectable hCCA can be considered for liver transplantation. Adjuvant chemotherapy should be offered to patients with a high risk of recurrence. The use of preoperative biliary drainage and the need for portal vein embolisation should be based on local multidisciplinary discussions. Patients with acute cholangitis can be drained with endoscopic or percutaneous biliary drainage. Palliative chemotherapy with cisplatin and gemcitabine has shown improved survival in patients with irresectable and recurrent hCCA.

Liver Transplant as a Treatment of Primary and Secondary Liver Neoplasms

Importance

Liver malignancies are an increasing global health concern with a high mortality. We review outcomes following liver transplant for primary and secondary hepatic malignancies.

Observations

Transplant may be a suitable treatment option for primary and secondary hepatic malignancies in well-selected patient populations.

Conclusions and Relevance

Many patients with primary or secondary liver tumors are not eligible for liver resection because of advanced underlying liver disease or high tumor burden, precluding complete tumor clearance. Although liver transplant has been a long-standing treatment modality for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma, recently transplant has been considered for patients with other malignant diagnoses. In particular, while well-established for hepatocellular carcinoma and select patients with perihilar cholangiocarcinoma, transplant has been increasingly used to treat patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, as well as metastatic disease from colorectal liver and neuroendocrine primary tumors. Because of the limited availability of grafts and the number of patients on the waiting list, optimal selection criteria must be further defined. The ethics of organ allocation to individuals who may benefit from prolonged survival after transplant yet have a high incidence of recurrence, as well as the role of living donation, need to be further discerned in the setting of transplant oncology.

Small Intestinal Adenocarcinoma Arising at the Anastomotic Site after Kasai Operation for Biliary Atresia: A Case Report and Literature Review

Biliary atresia is an obliterative cholangiopathy of unknown etiology. Hepatic portoenterostomy, in which obliterated extrahepatic bile ducts are resected and bile flow is restored, known as Kasai operation, is performed within 3 months after birth. While this operation enhances long-term survival of patients, the occurrence of primary malignant hepatic tumors has been increasing. We report a case of small intestinal adenocarcinoma arising at the anastomotic site after Kasai operation. A 49-year-old man, who underwent Kasai operation for biliary atresia when he was 2 months old, experienced rapidly progressive jaundice and liver dysfunction. Deceased-donor liver transplantation was performed for liver failure. Macroscopically, there was a white-yellow tumor located at the anastomotic site of hepatic portoenterostomy of the resected liver. Pathological examination revealed a well-differentiated adenocarcinoma with some Paneth cells in the neoplastic lesion. Immunohistochemically, the tumor cells were negative for cytokeratin 7 (CK7) but positive for cytokeratin 20 (CK20) and a homeobox domain-containing transcription factor (CDX2). Mucin expression in tumor cells was negative for mucin 1 (MUC1) and mucin 6 (MUC6) and positive for mucin 2 (MUC2) and mucin 5AC (MUC5AC). The pathological diagnosis was small intestinal adenocarcinoma originating from the jejunum. The patient was discharged 48 days after the operation. The patient had not experienced recurrence at 10 months after the operation. This is the first report of small intestinal adenocarcinoma arising at the anastomotic site after Kasai operation for biliary atresia. Special care should be taken for the patients after Kasai operation with acute progressive jaundice and liver dysfunction because there is a possibility of malignancy in their native liver.

British Society of Gastroenterology guidelines for the diagnosis and management of cholangiocarcinoma

These guidelines for the diagnosis and management of cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) were commissioned by the British Society of Gastroenterology liver section. The guideline writing committee included a multidisciplinary team of experts from various specialties involved in the management of CCA, as well as patient/public representatives from AMMF (the Cholangiocarcinoma Charity) and PSC Support. Quality of evidence is presented using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE II) format. The recommendations arising are to be used as guidance rather than as a strict protocol-based reference, as the management of patients with CCA is often complex and always requires individual patient-centred considerations.

Updates and Expert Opinions on Liver Transplantation for Gastrointestinal Malignancies

Transplant oncology is a relatively new field in which transplantation is used to treat patients who would otherwise be unresectable. New anticancer treatment paradigms using tumor and transplant immunology and cancer immunogenomics are emerging. In turn, liver transplantation (LT) has become a potential therapy for certain patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) with liver metastasis, hepatocellular (HCC), cholangiocarcinoma (CCA), and metastatic neuroendocrine tumor (NET) of the liver. Although there are established criteria for LT in HCC, evidence regarding LT as a treatment modality for certain gastrointestinal malignancies is still debated. The aim of this review is to highlight updates in the role of LT for certain malignancies, including HCC, metastatic CRC, hilar CCA, and neuroendocrine tumor (NET), as well as contextualize LT use and discuss controversies in transplant oncology.

New Insights in the Setting of Transplant Oncology

Background and Objectives: Liver transplantation (LT) is the best strategy for curing several primary and secondary hepatic malignancies. In recent years, growing interest has been observed in the enlargement of the transplant oncology indications. This paper aims to review the most recent developments in the setting of LT oncology, with particular attention to LT for unresectable colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) and cholangiocellular carcinoma (CCA). Materials and Methods: A review of the recently published literature was conducted. Results: Growing evidence exists on the efficacy of LT in curing CRLM and peri-hilar and intrahepatic CCA in well-selected patients when integrating this strategy with (neo)-adjuvant chemotherapy, radiotherapy, or locoregional treatments. Conclusion: For unresectable CCA and CRLM management, several prospective protocols are forthcoming to elucidate LT's impact relative to alternative therapies. Advances in diagnosis, treatment protocols, and donor-to-recipient matching are needed to better define the oncological indications for transplantation. Prospective, multicenter trials studying these advances and their impact on outcomes are still required.

New Challenges in the Management of Cholangiocarcinoma: The Role of Liver Transplantation, Locoregional Therapies, and Systemic Therapy

Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) is a neoplasm with high mortality that represents 15% of all primary liver tumors. Its worldwide incidence is on the rise, and despite important advances in the knowledge of molecular mechanisms, diagnosis, and treatment, overall survival has not substantially improved in the last decade. Surgical resection remains the cornerstone therapy for CCA. Unfortunately, complete resection is only possible in less than 15-35% of cases, with a risk of recurrence greater than 60%. Liver transplantation (LT) has been postulated as an effective therapeutic strategy in those intrahepatic CCA (iCCA) smaller than 3 cm. However, the low rate of early diagnosis in non-resectable patients justifies the low applicability in clinical practice. The evidence regarding LT in locally advanced iCCA is scarce and based on small, retrospective, and, in most cases, single-center case series. In this setting, the response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy could be useful in identifying a subgroup of patients with biologically less aggressive tumors in whom LT may be successful. The results of LT in pCCA are promising, however, we need a very careful selection of patients and adequate experience in the transplant center. Locoregional therapies may be relevant in unresectable, liver-only CCA. In iCCA smaller than 2 cm, particularly those arising in patients with advanced chronic liver disease in whom resection or LT may not be feasible, thermal ablation may become a reliable alternative. The greatest advances in the management of CCA occur in systemic treatment. Immunotherapy associated with chemotherapy has emerged as the gold standard in the first-line treatment. Likewise, the most encouraging results have been obtained with targeted therapies, where the use of personalized treatments has shown high rates of objective and durable tumor response, with clear signs of survival benefit. In conclusion, the future of CCA treatment seems to be marked by the development of new treatment strategies but high-quality, prospective studies that shed light on their use and applicability are mandatory.

A novel nomogram for adult primary perihilar cholangiocarcinoma and considerations concerning lymph node dissection

Objective

To construct a reliable nomogram available online to predict the postoperative survival of patients with perihilar cholangiocarcinoma.

Methods

Data from 1808 patients diagnosed with perihilar cholangiocarcinoma between 2004 and 2015 were extracted from the National Cancer Institute Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. They were randomly divided into training and validation sets. The nomogram was established by machine learning and Cox model. The discriminant ability and prediction accuracy of the nomogram were evaluated by concordance index (C-index), receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve and calibration curve. Kaplan-Meier curves show the prognostic value of the associated risk factors and classification system.

Results

Machine learning and multivariate Cox risk regression model showed that sex, age, tumor differentiation, primary tumor stage(T), lymph node metastasis(N), TNM stage, surgery, radiation, chemotherapy, lymph node dissection were associated with the prognosis of perihilar cholangiocarcinoma patients relevant factors (P < 0.05). A novel nomogram was established. The calibration plots, C-index and ROC curve for predictions of the 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS were in excellent agreement. In patients with stage T1 and N0 perihilar cholangiocarcinoma, the prognosis of ≥4 lymph nodes dissected was better than that of 1- 3 lymph nodes dissected (P < 0.01).

Conclusion

The nomogram prognostic prediction model can provide a reference for evaluating the prognosis and survival rate of patients with perihilar cholangiocarcinoma. Patients with stage T1 and N0 perihilar cholangiocarcinoma have more benefits by increasing the number of lymph node dissection.

Surgery

This chapter provides a comprehensive background from basic to applied knowledge of surgical anatomy which is necessary for the surgical treatment of cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) patients. Significant advances that have been made in the surgical treatment of CCA were examined. For instance, in-depth details are provided for appropriate preoperative assessment and treatment to optimize patient status and to improve the outcome of surgical treatment(s). Comprehensive details are provided for the surgical techniques and outcomes of treatments for each type of CCA with clear illustrations and images. This chapter also describes the role of minimally invasive surgery and liver transplantation in CCA treatment.

Can the Limits of Liver Transplantation Be Expanded in Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma?

The most common location of cholangiocarcinomas is the perihilar region with a frequency of 50-70%. Current standard treatment for perihilar cholangiocarcinomas (pCCA) is surgical resection. In cases where resection treatment is possible, the 5-year survival rate is 8-40%. However, using a very strict patient selection, neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy (NRCT), staging laparotomy, and liver transplantation (LT), called "the Mayo protocol," 5-year survivals of up to 70% in pCCA were reported. This treatment protocol clearly requires an intensive workforce and a harmonious multidisciplinary approach. Reoperation and retransplantation rates are high, which is a reflection of the NRCT. Multicenter studies, systemic reviews, and meta-analysis results, comparing both resection and LT in pCCA treatment and evaluating only LT results, pointed to LT with strict patient selection and full compliance with the treatment. The results of centers experienced in LT are better in treating pCCA. According to Mayo clinical data, histopathological diagnosis could not be obtained in half of the patients with pCCA before NRCT was given. This situation can be explained by the necrosis of the tumor due to the effect of NRCT and the fact that the tumor cannot be detected in the explant liver. This situation raises the following questions: did all patients actually have pCCA? Were these good results due to some patients not having pCCA? The 5-year survival rate was worse in patients with a pathological diagnosis than those without a pathological diagnosis. However, interestingly, recurrence rates were statistically similar in both groups. There was no difference in survival between LT and resection in the R0N0 subgroup in de novo pCCA. There are still many issues that need to be addressed and corrected in pCCA, which is one of the most problematic indications for LT. Significant success has been achieved with NRCT, staging laparotomy, and LT in selected patients with pCCA developing on the basis of PSC or early-stage unresectable de novo pCCA. It can be expected that new NRCT modalities will provide better survival by expanding the indications for LT in pCCA.

Outcomes After Liver Transplantation With Incidental Cholangiocarcinoma

Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) is currently a contraindication to liver transplantation (LT) in the United Kingdom (UK). Incidental CCA occurs rarely in some patients undergoing LT. We report on retrospective outcomes of patients with incidental CCA from six UK LT centres. Cases were identified from pathology records. Data regarding tumour characteristics and post-transplant survival were collected. CCA was classified by TNM staging and anatomical location. 95 patients who underwent LT between 1988-2020 were identified. Median follow-up after LT was 2.1 years (14 days-18.6 years). Most patients were male (68.4%), median age at LT was 53 (IQR 46-62), and the majority had underlying PSC (61%). Overall median survival after LT was 4.4 years. Survival differed by tumour site: 1-, 3-, and 5-year estimated survival was 82.1%, 68.7%, and 57.1%, respectively, in intrahepatic CCA (n = 40) and 58.5%, 42.6%, and 30.2% in perihilar CCA (n = 42; p = 0.06). 1-, 3-, and 5-year estimated survival was 95.8%, 86.5%, and 80.6%, respectively, in pT1 tumours (28.2% of cohort), and 65.8%, 44.7%, and 31.1%, respectively, in pT2-4 (p = 0.018). Survival after LT for recipients with incidental CCA is inferior compared to usual outcomes for LT in the United Kingdom. LT for earlier stage CCA has similar survival to LT for hepatocellular cancer, and intrahepatic CCAs have better survival compared to perihilar CCAs. These observations may support LT for CCA in selected cases.

Feasibility and Efficacy of Adjuvant Chemotherapy With Gemcitabine After Liver Transplantation for Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma - A Multi-Center, Randomized, Controlled Trial (pro-duct001)

Background

Liver transplantation (LT) is considered a therapeutic option for unresectable perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (PHC) within defined criteria. It remains uncertain whether patients can safely receive adjuvant chemotherapy after LT.

Methods

We performed a prospective, multi-center, randomized, non-blinded two-arm trial (pro-duct001). Patients after LT for unresectable PHC within defined criteria were randomized to adjuvant gemcitabine (LT-Gem group) and LT alone (LT alone group). The primary objective was to investigate if adjuvant chemotherapy is feasible in ≥ 85% of patients after LT. The primary endpoint was the percentage of patients completing the 24 weeks course of adjuvant chemotherapy. Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS) and disease-free (DFS), and complication rates.

Results

Twelve patients underwent LT for PHC, of which six (50%) were eligible for randomization (LT-Gem: three patients, LT alone: three patients). Two out of three patients discontinued adjuvant chemotherapy after LT due to intolerance. The study was prematurely terminated due to slow enrollment. One patient with PHC had underlying primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC). Tumor-free margins could be achieved in all patients. In both the LT-Gem and the LT alone group, the cumulative 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS and DFS rates were 100%, 100%, 67%, and 100%, 67% and 67%, respectively.

Conclusions

This prospective, multi-center study was prematurely terminated due to slow enrollment and a statement on the defined endpoints cannot be made. Nevertheless, long-term survival data are consistent with available retrospective data and confirm defined criteria for LT. Since more evidence of LT per se in unresectable PHC is urgently needed, a prospective, non-randomized follow-up study (pro-duct002) has since been launched.

Systematic review and meta-analysis of surgery for hilar cholangiocarcinoma with arterial resection

BACKGROUND

With the advances in multimodality treatment, an analysis of the outcome of arterial resections (AR) in surgery of cholangiocarcinoma is lacking. The aim of this meta-analysis was to summarize the currently available evidence onof AR for the treatment of cholangiocarcinoma.

METHODS

A systematic literature search was carried out according to PRISMA guidelines.

RESULTS

10 retrospective cohort studies published from 2007 to 2020 with 2530 patients (408 AR group and 2122 control group) were identified. Higher in-hospital mortality rates (6.8% vs 3.3%, OR 2.65, 95% CI [1.27; 5.32], p = 0.009), higher morbidity rates (Clavien-Dindo classification ≥3 ) (52% vs 47%, OR 1.44, 95% CI [1.02; 1.75], p = 0.04) and lower 1-year, 3-year and 5-year survival rates (54% vs 69%, OR 0.55, 95% CI [0.34; 0.91 p = 0.02), (34% vs 38%, OR 0.74, 95% CI [0.55; 0.98, p = 0.03), (18% vs 29%, OR 0.54, 95% CI [0.39; 0.75, p = 0.0002) were observed in the AR group when compared to the control group.

CONCLUSION

Evidence from non-randomized studies shows a higher morbidity and mortality and shorter long-term survival in patients undergoing AR. However, the results are prone to selection bias, and only randomized trials comparing AR and palliative treatments AR might reveal a possible benefit of AR.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

PROSPERO ID 223396.

EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines on sclerosing cholangitis

Management of primary or secondary sclerosing cholangitis is challenging. These Clinical Practice Guidelines have been developed to provide practical guidance on debated topics including diagnostic methods, prognostic assessment, early detection of complications, optimal care pathways and therapeutic (pharmacological, endoscopic or surgical) options both in adults and children.

Aktuelle Studien und Evidenz zum Cholangiokarzinom

Cholangiokarzinome (CCA) stellen die zweithäufigsten primären Leberkarzinome dar und umfassen eine heterogene Gruppe aus intra- und extrahepatischen Gallenwegstumoren. Die Prognose der Patienten ist sowohl aufgrund einer hohen Rezidivrate als auch häufig später Diagnosestellung in fortgeschrittenen Stadien eingeschränkt. Den Goldstandard der kurativen Therapie bildet die komplette Resektion; sie erfordert komplex-onkologische Eingriffe mit ggf. vorgeschalteten Hypertrophieinduktionen der Restleber zur Sicherung einer postoperativ ausreichenden Leberfunktion. Als adjuvante Therapie ist eine 6-monatige Therapie mit Capecitabin etabliert. Die Therapielandschaft im fortgeschrittenen Stadium der Erkrankung befindet sich aufgrund neuer Daten aus klinischen Phase-II/III-Studien stetig im Wandel. Einerseits ebneten molekulare Analysen den Weg hin zu effektiven zielgerichteten Behandlungen von selektionierten CCA-Patienten mit u. a. Alterationen in FGFR2- oder IDH1-Signalwegen; andererseits erwiesen sich in aktuellen klinischen Studien immunonkologische Kombinationsansätze als effektive und sichere All-Comer-Therapien für die Behandlung eines unselektionierten Patientenkollektivs. Weitere Studien evaluieren sowohl Kombinationsbehandlungen als auch molekulare Stratifikation als neue Therapiekonzepte auch in früheren Erkrankungsstadien und werden die Therapielandschaft und Prognose der Patienten in Zukunft verbessern.

[Cholangiocarcinoma-Intrahepatic to hilar bile duct cancer]

BACKGROUND

In addition to conditioning measures in liver surgery, perioperative anti-tumor therapy is becoming increasingly more important in cholangiocarcinoma (CCA).

OBJECTIVE

Systematic literature review on the status of multimodal and in particular neoadjuvant therapy for CCA.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Literature overview of the current scientific original and review articles.

RESULTS

Resection and rarely also liver transplantation are still the only curative treatment approaches for CCA in the non-distant metastatic stage; however, long-term results, e.g. in node positive tumors, are still unsatisfactory. Adjuvant chemotherapy is now standard but cannot be used in many patients. Neoadjuvant concepts include chemotherapy and local and locoregional procedures, such as radioembolization. Both are increasingly used in intrahepatic CCA (iCCA) but rarely in perihilar CCA. Initial data show that this is very effective in iCCA to achieve secondary operability in primarily inoperable cases. In addition, based on the current literature, neoadjuvant therapy also seems justified in operable intrahepatic CCA with a high risk of recurrence (e.g. lymph node metastases).

CONCLUSION

There is a high potential for the use of multimodal therapy in CCA, which could further increase in the near future as a result of new therapeutic agents. Due to the lack of evidence clear recommendations cannot be given; however, it is becoming apparent that neoadjuvant therapy is gaining importance in iCCA and is already increasingly used as part of individual concepts in patients with a high risk of recurrence.

Single-center experience of liver transplantation for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

Traditionally, curative resection was considered the cornerstone of treatment for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma. More recently, liver transplantation (LT) offered an alternative for patients with unresectable disease. The purpose of this study was to assess our experience with perihilar cholangiocarcinoma and LT.

METHODS

A perihilar cholangiocarcinoma protocol was commenced in 2006 whereby diagnosed patients were enrolled onto an institutional registry for LT consideration. Data on patient progression and oncologic outcomes were assessed.

RESULTS

Fifty-eight patients were initially enrolled onto the protocol and 38 proceeded to LT following neoadjuvant chemoradiation (mean age 55.6 ± 11.4 years). Mean time to LT was 3.7 ± 2 months and, among those transplanted, 14 (37%) had underlying primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC). Thirteen (34%) patients developed malignant recurrence and there were no differences in disease recurrence between PSC (n = 3) and non-PSC (n = 10) patients (p = 0.32). Overall patient survival was 91%, 58% and 52% at 1-, 3- and 5-years corresponding with 81%, 52% and 46% graft survival, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Rigorous patient selection and chemoradiation treatment algorithms can be highly effective in treating perihilar cholangiocarcinoma. For appropriately selected candidates, LT can provide a 52% 5-year survival for patients who would otherwise have no surgical treatment option.

A 3-Decade, Single-Center Experience of Liver Transplantation for Cholangiocarcinoma: Impact of Era, Tumor Size, Location, and Neoadjuvant Therapy

Liver transplantation (LT) for cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) remains limited to a small number of centers. Although the role of neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) has been explored over time, an in-depth analysis of NAT strategies remains limited. Furthermore, controversy exists regarding acceptable tumor size during patient selection for LT. This study explores the impact of era, tumor size, and NAT strategy on LT outcomes for CCA. We conducted a retrospective review of 53 patients with CCA treated with LT from 1985 to 2019; 19 hilar CCA (hCCA) and 30 intrahepatic CCA (iCCA) were included. The relative contributions of varying NAT (neoadjuvant chemotherapy [NAC], neoadjuvant local therapy [NALT], and combined NAC and NALT [NACLT]) as well as the implication of tumor size and era were analyzed. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Compared with the old era (1985-2007), 5-year OS in patients who underwent LT in the recent era (2008-2019) showed a superior trend. The 5-year OS from initial treatment in patients receiving NACLT for hCCA and iCCA were 88% and 100% versus 9% and 41% in patients without it, respectively (P = 0.01 for hCCA; P = 0.02 for iCCA), whereas NAC or NALT alone did not show significant differences in OS versus no NAT (P > 0.05). Although 33 patients had large-size tumors (hCCA ≥ 30 mm, n = 12, or iCCA ≥ 50 mm, n = 21), tumor size had no impact on survival outcomes. Outcomes of LT for CCA seem to have improved over time. Multimodal NAT is associated with improved survival in LT for both iCCA and hCCA regardless of tumor size.

Current status of liver transplantation for cholangiocarcinoma

Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) is the second most common liver cancer with a median survival of 12-24 mo without treatment. It is further classified based on its location into intrahepatic CCA (iCCA), perihilar CCA (pCCA), and distal CCA. Surgical resection is the mainstay of treatment, but up to 70% of these tumors are inoperable at the time of diagnosis. CCA was previously an absolute contraindication for liver transplantation (LT) due to poor outcomes primary due to early recurrent disease. However, improvement in patient selection criteria and neoadjuvant treatment protocols have improved outcomes for inoperable pCCA patients with recent studies reporting LT may improve survival in iCCA. Future advances in the treatment of CCA should include refining patient selection criteria and organ allocation for all subtypes of CCA, determining effective immunotherapies and the evolving role of personalized medicine in patients ineligible for surgical resection or LT. Our article reviews the current status of LT in CCA, along with future directions in managing patients with CCA.

PROTOCOL FOR LIVER TRANSPLANTATION IN HILAR CHOLANGIOCARCINOMA

Background:

Hilar cholangiocarcinoma represents more than half of all cholangiocarcinoma cases, having poor prognosis and presenting a median overall survival after diagnosis of 12-24 months. In patients who have unresectable tumors with a better prognosis, the proposal to perform liver transplantation emerged for expanding the possibility of free margins by performing total hepatectomy.

Aim:

To provide a Brazilian protocol for liver transplantation in patients with hilar cholangiocarcinoma.

Method:

The protocol was carried out by two Brazilian institutions which perform a large volume of resections and liver transplantations, based on the study carried out at the Mayo Clinic. The elaboration of the protocol was conducted in four stages.

Result:

A protocol proposal for this disease is presented, which needs to be validated for clinical use.

Conclusion:

The development of a liver transplantation protocol for cholangiocarcinoma aims not only to standardize the treatment, but also enable a better assessment of the surgical results in the future.

Outcome after resection for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma in patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis: an international multicentre study

BACKGROUND

Resection for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (pCCA) in primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) has been reported to lead to worse outcomes than resection for non-PSC pCCA. The aim of this study was to compare prognostic factors and outcomes after resection in patients with PSC-associated pCCA and non-PSC pCCA.

METHODS

The international retrospective cohort comprised patients resected for pCCA from 21 centres (2000-2020). Patients operated with hepatobiliary resection, with pCCA verified by histology and with data on PSC status, were included. The primary outcome was overall survival. Secondary outcomes were disease-free survival and postoperative complications.

RESULTS

Of 1128 pCCA patients, 34 (3.0%) had underlying PSC. Median overall survival after resection was 33 months for PSC patients and 29 months for non-PSC patients (p = .630). Complications (Clavien-Dindo grade ≥ 3) were more frequent in PSC pCCA (71% versus 44%, p = .003). The rate of posthepatectomy liver failure (21% versus 17%, p = .530) and 90-day mortality (12% versus 13%, p = 1.000) was similar for PSC and non-PSC patients.

CONCLUSION

Median overall survival after resection for pCCA was similar in patients with underlying PSC and non-PSC patients. Complications were more frequent after resection for PSC-associated pCCA, with no difference in postoperative mortality.

Vascular Resection in Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma

Among the cholangiocarcinomas, the most common type is perihilar (phCC), accounting for approximately 60% of cases, after which are the distal and then intrahepatic forms. There is no staging system that allows for a comparison of all series and extraction of conclusions that increase the long-term survival rate of this dismal disease. The extension of the resection, which theoretically depends on the type of phCC, is not a closed subject. As surgery is the only known way to achieve a cure, many aggressive approaches have been adopted. Despite extended liver resections and even vascular resections, margins are positive in around one third of patients. In the past two decades, with advances in diagnostic and surgical techniques, surgical outcomes and survival rates have gradually improved, although variability is the rule, with morbidity and mortality rates ranging from 14% to 76% and from 0% to 19%, respectively. Extended hepatectomies and portal vein resection, or even right hepatic artery reconstruction for the left side tumors are frequently needed. Salvage procedures when arterial reconstruction is not feasible, as well as hepatopancreatoduodenectomy, are still under evaluation too. In this article, we discuss the aggressive surgical approach to phCC focused on vascular resection. Disparate results on the surgical treatment of phCC made it impossible to reach clear-cut conclusions.

Liver Transplantation for Cholangiocarcinoma: Charting a Path With Lessons Learned From Center Experience

Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text.

Background.

While liver transplantation (LT) with neoadjuvant chemoradiation is increasingly utilized for the management of unresectable cholangiocarcinoma (CCA), data on post-LT survival are limited.

Methods.

We identified 844 patients who underwent LT (2002–2019) for nonincidental (CCA listing) or incidental (CCA on explant, not at listing) CCA in the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients. Kaplan–Meier and multivariable proportional hazards regression methods evaluated the effects of patient characteristics, donor type, transplant era (before/after 2010), and center volume (center-level CCALTs/active year) on the risk of graft failure and patient mortality.

Results.

One center performed >12 CCALTs/y, and the rest performed ≤4. Five-year graft survival was 50.6%. Multivariable models demonstrated laboratory model of end-stage liver disease ≥40 versus <15 and center volumes of 1, >1 to ≤2, and >2 to ≤4 CCALTs/y compared to >12 were associated with increased risk of graft failure and mortality (all P ≤ 0.002). Extra vessel use was associated with center volume. Among all recipients, extra vessel use occurred in 55.4% of CCALTs performed at the highest volume center and in 14.0% of cases at centers having ≤4 CCAs/y (P < 0.05).

Conclusions.

Center volume-related differences in outcomes and extra vessel use highlight the importance of establishing a unified, effective treatment protocol and the potential utility of regionalization of LT for CCA.

New Indications for Liver Transplantation

Liver transplantation (LT) is an important therapeutic option for the treatment of several liver diseases. Modern LT is characterized by remarkable improvements in post-transplant patient survival, graft survival, and quality of life. Thanks to these great improvements, indications for LT are expanding. Nowadays, clinical conditions historically considered exclusion criteria for LT, have been considered new indications for LT, showing survival advantages for patients. In this review, we provide an updated overview of the principal newer indications for LT, with particular attention to alcoholic hepatitis, acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF), cholangiocarcinoma and colorectal cancer metastases.

Recurrent Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis: Current Understanding, Management, and Future Directions

Patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) constitute 5 to 15% of patients listed for liver transplantation worldwide. Although post-transplant outcomes are favorable, recurrent PSC (rPSC) occurs in an important subset of patients, with higher prevalence rates reported with increasing time from transplant. Given its association with poor graft outcomes and risk of retransplant, effort has been made to understand rPSC, its pathophysiology, and risk factors. This review covers these facets of rPSC and focuses on implicated risk factors including pretransplant recipient characteristics, inflammatory bowel-disease-related factors, and donor-specific and transplant-specific factors. Confirming a diagnosis of rPSC requires thoughtful consideration of alternative etiologies so as to ensure confidence in diagnosis, management, subsequent risk assessment, and counseling for patients. Unfortunately, no cure exists for rPSC; however, future large-scale efforts are underway to better characterize the natural history of rPSC and its associated risk factors with hopes of identifying potential key targets for novel therapies.

Liver Transplantation in Malignancies: A Comprehensive and Systematic Review on Oncological Outcome

INTRODUCTION

Liver transplantation (LT) is today's standard treatment for both end-stage liver disease and tumors; however, suitable grafts for LT are a scarce resource and outcome after LT is highly dependent on its underlying indication. Thus, patients must be carefully selected to optimize the number of life years gained per graft. This comprehensive and systematic review critically reflects the most recently published oncological outcome data after LT in malignancies based on the preoperative radiological findings.

METHODS

A systematic literature search was conducted to detect preferentially most recent high-volume series or large database analysis on oncological outcomes after LT for both primary liver cancer and liver metastases between January 1, 2019, and November 14, 2020. A comprehensive review on the radiological assessment of the reviewed liver malignancies is included and its preoperative value for an outcome-driven indication reflected.

RESULTS

Twenty most recent high-volume or relevant studies including a total number of 2,521 patients were identified including 4, 4, 4, 4, 3, and 1 publications on oncological outcome after LT for hepatocellular carcinoma, cholangiocellular carcinoma, hepatic epitheloid hemangioendothelioma, hepatoblastoma, and both metastatic neuroendocrine tumors and colorectal cancer, respectively. The overall survival is comparable to patients without tumors if patients with malignancies are well selected for LT; however, this is highly dependent on tumor entity, tumor stage, and both neoadjuvant and concomitant treatment.

DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION

LT is a promising option for better survival in patients with malignant liver tumors in selected patients; however, the indication must be critically discussed prior to LT in every single case in the context of organ shortage.

Current Surgical Management of Peri-Hilar and Intra-Hepatic Cholangiocarcinoma

Cholangiocarcinoma accounts for approximately 10% of all hepatobiliary tumors and represents 3% of all new-diagnosed malignancies worldwide. Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (i-CCA) accounts for 10% of all cases, perihilar (h-CCA) cholangiocarcinoma represents two-thirds of the cases, while distal cholangiocarcinoma accounts for the remaining quarter. Originally described by Klatskin in 1965, h-CCA represents one of the most challenging tumors for hepatobiliary surgeons, mainly because of the anatomical vascular relationships of the biliary confluence at the hepatic hilum. Surgery is the only curative option, with the goal of a radical, margin-negative (R0) tumor resection. Continuous efforts have been made by hepatobiliary surgeons in order to achieve R0 resections, leading to the progressive development of aggressive approaches that include extended hepatectomies, associating liver partition, and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy, pre-operative portal vein embolization, and vascular resections. i-CCA is an aggressive biliary cancer that arises from the biliary epithelium proximal to the second-degree bile ducts. The incidence of i-CCA is dramatically increasing worldwide, and surgical resection is the only potentially curative therapy. An aggressive surgical approach, including extended liver resection and vascular reconstruction, and a greater application of systemic therapy and locoregional treatments could lead to an increase in the resection rate and the overall survival in selected i-CCA patients. Improvements achieved over the last two decades and the encouraging results recently reported have led to liver transplantation now being considered an appropriate indication for CCA patients.

The Role of Surgical Resection and Liver Transplantation for the Treatment of Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma

Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA) is a rare and complex malignancy of the biliary epithelium. Due to its silent presentation, patients are frequently diagnosed late in their disease course, resulting in poor overall survival. Advances in molecular profiling and targeted therapies have improved medical management, but long-term survival is rarely seen with medical therapy alone. Surgical resection offers a survival advantage, but negative oncologic margins are difficult to achieve, recurrence rates are high, and the need for adequate future liver remnant limits the extent of resection. Advances in neoadjuvant and adjuvant treatments have broadened patient treatment options, and these agents are undergoing active investigation, especially in the setting of advanced, initially unresectable disease. For those who are not able to undergo resection, liver transplantation is emerging as a potential curative therapy in certain cases. Patient selection, favorable tumor biology, and a protocolized, multidisciplinary approach are ultimately necessary for best patient outcomes. This review will discuss the current surgical management of locally advanced, liver-limited intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma as well as the role of liver transplantation for select patients with background liver disease.

Liver transplantation for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: patient selection and outcomes

Introduction: Peri-hilar cholangiocarcinoma is an aggressive bile duct cancer. Long-term survival is possible with margin-negative surgery. Historically, unresectable disease was approached with non-curative treatment options. In recent decades, an innovative approach of neoadjuvant chemoradiation and liver transplantation has demonstrated long-term survival for highly selected patients.Areas covered: This is a critical analysis of studies published to date on neoadjuvant chemoradiation and liver transplantation for selected patients with peri-hilar cholangiocarcinoma. A PubMed literature search was conducted for years 1970-2020 with the following search criteria: ['hilar' OR 'peri-hilar' AND 'cholangiocarcinoma'] AND ['treatment' OR 'transplantation' OR 'survival' OR 'outcome']; 'neoadjuvant chemoradiation' AND 'unresectable cholangiocarcinoma'. All peer-reviewed original research studies were selected for review.Expert opinion: Neoadjuvant chemoradiation and liver transplantation for patients with early stage unresectable peri-hilar cholangiocarcinoma can achieve long-term survival in highly selected patients who survive to transplantation without disease progression. There are observed differences in survival for patients with PSC-associated versus de novo cholangiocarcinoma and transplanted versus resected patients; however, these differences are not contextualized by established tumor and patient factors that influence recurrence and survival. Therefore, these results must be interpreted within the limitations of the study designs upon which they are based.

The Clinical Management of Cholangiocarcinoma in the United States and Europe: A Comprehensive and Evidence-Based Comparison of Guidelines

BACKGROUND

The incidence of cholangiocarcinoma has doubled over the last 15 years with a similar rise in mortality, which provides the impetus for standardization of evidence-based care through the establishment of guidelines.

METHODS

We compared available guidelines on the clinical management of cholangiocarcinoma in the United States and Europe, which included the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN), European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO), British Society of Gastroenterology (BSG) and the International Liver Cancer Association (ILCA) guidelines.

RESULTS

There is discordance in the recommendation for biopsy in patients with potentially resectable cholangiocarcinoma and in the recommendation for use of fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography scans. Similarly, the recommendation for preoperative biliary drainage for extrahepatic and perihilar cholangiocarcinoma in the setting of jaundice is inconsistent across all four guidelines. The BILCAP (capecitabine) and ABC-02 trials (gemcitabine with cisplatin) have provided the strongest evidence for systemic therapy in the adjuvant and palliative settings, respectively, but all guidelines have refrained from setting them as standard of care, given heterogeneity in the study cohorts and ABC-02's negative intention-to-treat results.

CONCLUSIONS

Future progress in enhancing survivorship of patients with cholangiocarcinoma would likely entail improvements in diagnostic biomarkers and novel systemic therapies. Based on recent results from studies of targeted therapy, future iterations of the guidelines will likely incorporate molecular profiling.

Expanding Indications for Liver Transplant: Tumor and Patient Factors

During the past few decades, liver transplant has developed from a high-mortality procedure to an almost routine procedure with good survival outcomes. The development of living donor liver transplant has increased the availability of liver grafts, and the scope of indications for liver transplant has been expanding ever since. The aim of this review is to provide an overview of such an expansion of scope. Various criteria have been proposed to expand the eligibility of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma exceeding the Milan criteria for liver transplant. Furthermore, liver transplant is increasingly performed as a treatment modality for cholangiocarcinoma, neuroendocrine liver metastasis and colorectal liver metastasis. The number of elderly patients receiving liver transplant is on the rise. Combined organ transplantation has also been adopted to treat patients with multiple organ failure. Going forward, further development of preoperative noninvasive predictors in tumor, patient and even donor factors is needed to identify patients at risk of poor outcomes and hence optimize patient management.

Italian Clinical Practice Guidelines on Cholangiocarcinoma - Part II: Treatment

Currently, the only curative treatment for cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) is surgical resection, though this treatment is possible in less than 40% of patients. However, recent improvements in preoperative management have led to a higher number of patients who are candidates for this procedure. For unresectable patients, progress is ongoing in terms of locoregional and chemoradiation treatments and target therapies, especially in the definition of patient selection criteria. This is the second part of the Italian CCA guidelines, dealing with CCA treatment, that have been formulated in accordance with Italian National Institute of Health indications and developed according to the GRADE method and related advancements.

What did the European Liver Transplant Registry bring to liver transplantation?

Since its foundation in 1985, the European Liver Transplant Registry has evolved to become an important tool to monitor the liver transplantation activity in Europe. The vast amount of data collected on 169 473 liver transplantations performed in 153 238 recipients has also resulted in scientific publications. Without doubt, several of these have influenced the daily practice of liver transplantation. This paper gives an overview of the development, the functioning, and the scientific activity of the European Liver Transplant Registry during more than three decades. Indeed, it can be said that the registry helped to advance the practice of liver transplantation not only in Europe but also worldwide.

Liver Transplantation for Peri-hilar Cholangiocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

Liver transplantation for peri-hilar cholangiocarcinoma (pCCA) following neoadjuvant chemoradiation achieves excellent long-term survival in carefully selected patients with early-stage unresectable pCCA and patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC)-associated pCCA. Strict adherence to selection criteria, aggressive neoadjuvant therapy, operative staging prior to transplantation, and several technical accommodations during the transplant operation are necessary for success. In this review, we provide a contemporaneous overview of liver transplantation for pCCA, including selection criteria, neoadjuvant therapy, operative staging, and technical aspects of liver transplantation unique to patients with pCCA and an irradiated operative field. We also discuss several evolving trends intended to improve patient outcomes.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSION

Intention-to-treat and patient outcomes after liver transplantation for PSC-associated pCCA are superior to de novo pCCA. Outcomes between living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) and deceased donor liver transplantation are similar for patients with PSC-associated pCCA. However, LDLT for de novo pCCA shows a trend toward more disease recurrence and worse patient survival. A period of waiting time before transplant may be beneficial in selecting for patients with superior outcomes after transplant. Compared with liver transplantation for other indications, there is an increased risk of late arterial and portal vein complications, presumably due to the radiation. However, with close follow-up and prompt intervention for vascular complications, graft loss can be avoided. Neoadjuvant therapy and liver transplantation can achieve results comparable with resection for patients with early-stage unresectable pCCA and is the treatment of choice for patients with pCCA arising in the setting of PSC.

Liver Transplantation for Cholangiocarcinoma and Mixed Hepatocellular Cholangiocarcinoma: Working Group Report From the ILTS Transplant Oncology Consensus Conference

Liver transplantation for cholangiocarcinoma has been an absolute contraindication worldwide due to poor results. However, in recent years and thanks to improvements of patient management and treatments of this cancer, this indication has been revisited. This consensus paper, approved by the International Liver Transplant Society, aims to provide a collection of expert opinions, consensus, and best practices surrounding liver transplantation for cholangiocarcinoma.

Recent developments and ongoing trials in transplant oncology

Over the past two decades since the introduction of the Milan criteria, the field of transplant oncology has undergone a rapid development with a rising proportion of liver transplantations being performed for oncological indications. For many patients with liver tumours, transplantation represents the only chance for cure. However, many challenges remain, such as the adequate patient selection, management of post-transplant recurrence and refinement of neoadjuvant treatment protocols. This review provides an overview of the current state of the art of liver transplantation for oncological indications such as hepatocellular carcinoma, cholangiocarcinoma, colorectal liver metastasis and metastatic neuroendocrine tumours. We also summarize the ongoing research and explore future trends. Clinical trials are currently studying new diagnostic modalities, innovative pharmacological treatments, novel surgical techniques, downstaging regimens and new indications for liver transplantation. These emerging results will continue to shape the field of transplant oncology and provide us with the necessary tools to better select, treat and follow patients with liver tumours qualifying for liver transplantation.

Eligibility for Liver Transplantation in Patients with Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

Liver transplantation (LT) has been performed in a select group of patients presenting with unresectable or primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC)-associated perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (pCCA) in the Mayo Clinic with a reported 5-year overall survival (OS) of 53% on intention-to-treat analysis. The objective of this study was to estimate eligibility for LT in a cohort of pCCA patients in two tertiary referral centers.

METHODS

Patients diagnosed with pCCA between 2002 and 2014 were included from two tertiary referral centers in the Netherlands. The selection criteria used by the Mayo Clinic were retrospectively applied to determine the proportion of patients that would have been eligible for LT.

RESULTS

A total of 732 consecutive patients with pCCA were identified, of whom 24 (4%) had PSC-associated pCCA. Overall, 154 patients had resectable disease on imaging and 335 patients were ineligible for LT because of lymph node or distant metastases. An age limit of 70 years led to the exclusion of 50 patients who would otherwise be eligible for LT. After applying the Mayo Clinic criteria, only 34 patients (5%) were potentially eligible for LT. Median survival from diagnosis for these 34 patients was 13 months (95% CI 3-23).

CONCLUSION

Only 5% of all patients presenting with pCCA were potentially eligible for LT under the Mayo criteria. Without transplantation, a median OS of about 1 year was observed.