Genome-Wide Meta-Analysis of Sciatica in Finnish Population

[The EAN-NeuPSIG guideline on the diagnosis of neuropathic pain-a summary]

In this joint guideline of the scientific societies and working groups mentioned in the title, evidence-based recommendations for the use of screening questionnaires and diagnostic tests in patients with neuropathic pain were developed. The systematic literature search and meta-analysis yielded the following results: Of the screening questionnaires, Douleur Neuropathique en 4 Questions (DN4), I‑DN4 (self-administered DN4), and Leeds Assessment of Neuropathic Symptoms and Signs (LANSS) received a strong recommendation, while S‑LANSS (self-administered LANSS) and PainDETECT received weak recommendations for their use in the diagnostic workup of patients with possible neuropathic pain. There was a strong recommendation for the use of skin biopsy and a weak recommendation for quantitative sensory testing and nociceptive evoked potentials. The role of confocal corneal microscopy is still unclear. Functional imaging and peripheral nerve blocks are helpful in elucidating the pathophysiology, but current literature does not support their use in diagnosing neuropathic pain. In selected cases, genetic testing in specialized centers may be considered.

Can we achieve pain stratification in musculoskeletal conditions? Implications for clinical practice

In the last few years there has been an increased appreciation that pain perception in rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases (RMDs) has several mechanisms which include nociceptive, inflammatory, nociplastic and neuropathic components. Studies in specific patient groups have also demonstrated that the pain experienced by people with specific diagnoses can present with distinctive components over time. For example, the pain observed in rheumatoid arthritis has been widely accepted to be caused by the activation of nociceptors, potentiated by the release of inflammatory mediators, including prostaglandins, leukotrienes and cytokine networks in the joint environment. However, people with RA may also experience nociplastic and neuropathic pain components, particularly when treatments with disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) have been implemented and are insufficient to control pain symptoms. In other RMDs, the concept of pain sensitisation or nociplastic pain in driving ongoing pain symptoms e.g. osteoarthritis and fibromyalgia, is becoming increasingly recognised. In this review, we explore the hypothesis that pain has distinct modalities based on clinical, pathophysiological, imaging and genetic factors. The concept of pain stratification in RMD is explored and implications for future management are also discussed.

A systematic review of genome-wide association studies for pain, nociception, neuropathy, and pain treatment responses

ABSTRACT

Pain is the leading cause of disability worldwide, imposing an enormous burden on personal health and society. Pain is a multifactorial and multidimensional problem. Currently, there is (some) evidence that genetic factors could partially explain individual susceptibility to pain and interpersonal differences in pain treatment response. To better understand the underlying genetic mechanisms of pain, we systematically reviewed and summarized genome-wide association studies (GWASes) investigating the associations between genetic variants and pain/pain-related phenotypes in humans. We reviewed 57 full-text articles and identified 30 loci reported in more than 1 study. To check whether genes described in this review are associated with (other) pain phenotypes, we searched 2 pain genetic databases, Human Pain Genetics Database and Mouse Pain Genetics Database. Six GWAS-identified genes/loci were also reported in those databases, mainly involved in neurological functions and inflammation. These findings demonstrate an important contribution of genetic factors to the risk of pain and pain-related phenotypes. However, replication studies with consistent phenotype definitions and sufficient statistical power are required to validate these pain-associated genes further. Our review also highlights the need for bioinformatic tools to elucidate the function of identified genes/loci. We believe that a better understanding of the genetic background of pain will shed light on the underlying biological mechanisms of pain and benefit patients by improving the clinical management of pain.

Joint European Academy of Neurology-European Pain Federation-Neuropathic Pain Special Interest Group of the International Association for the Study of Pain guidelines on neuropathic pain assessment

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

In these guidelines, we aimed to develop evidence-based recommendations for the use of screening questionnaires and diagnostic tests in patients with neuropathic pain (NeP).

METHODS

We systematically reviewed studies providing information on the sensitivity and specificity of screening questionnaires, and quantitative sensory testing, neurophysiology, skin biopsy, and corneal confocal microscopy. We also analysed how functional neuroimaging, peripheral nerve blocks, and genetic testing might provide useful information in diagnosing NeP.

RESULTS

Of the screening questionnaires, Douleur Neuropathique en 4 Questions (DN4), I-DN4 (self-administered DN4), and Leeds Assessment of Neuropathic Symptoms and Signs (LANSS) received a strong recommendation, and S-LANSS (self-administered LANSS) and PainDETECT weak recommendations for their use in the diagnostic pathway for patients with possible NeP. We devised a strong recommendation for the use of skin biopsy and a weak recommendation for quantitative sensory testing and nociceptive evoked potentials in the NeP diagnosis. Trigeminal reflex testing received a strong recommendation in diagnosing secondary trigeminal neuralgia. Although many studies support the usefulness of corneal confocal microscopy in diagnosing peripheral neuropathy, no study specifically investigated the diagnostic accuracy of this technique in patients with NeP. Functional neuroimaging and peripheral nerve blocks are helpful in disclosing pathophysiology and/or predicting outcomes, but current literature does not support their use for diagnosing NeP. Genetic testing may be considered at specialist centres, in selected cases.

CONCLUSIONS

These recommendations provide evidence-based clinical practice guidelines for NeP diagnosis. Due to the poor-to-moderate quality of evidence identified by this review, future large-scale, well-designed, multicentre studies assessing the accuracy of diagnostic tests for NeP are needed.

Low Back Pain With Persistent Radiculopathy; the Clinical Role of Genetic Variants in the Genes SOX5, CCDC26/GSDMC and DCC

In a recently published genome-wide association study (GWAS) chronic back pain was associated with three loci; SOX5, CCDC26/GSDMC and DCC. This GWAS was based on a heterogeneous sample of back pain disorders, and it is unknown whether these loci are of clinical relevance for low back pain (LBP) with persistent radiculopathy. Thus, we examine if LBP with radiculopathy 12 months after an acute episode of LBP with radiculopathy is associated with the selected single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs); SOX5 rs34616559, CCDC26/GSDMC rs7833174 and DCC rs4384683. In this prospective cohort study, subjects admitted to a secondary health care institution due to an acute episode of LBP with radiculopathy, reported back pain, leg pain, and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), were genotyped and followed up at 12 months (n = 338). Kruskal-Wallis H test showed no association between the SNPs and back pain, leg pain or ODI. In conclusion, LBP with radiculopathy 12 months after an acute episode of LBP with radiculopathy, is not associated with the selected SNPs; SOX5 rs34616559, CCDC26/GSDMC rs7833174 and DCC rs4384683. This absent or weak association suggests that the SNPs previously associated with chronic back pain are not useful as prognostic biomarkers for LBP with persistent radiculopathy.

[Entrapment neuropathies: a contemporary approach to pathophysiology, clinical assessment, and management : German version]

Entrapment neuropathies such as carpal tunnel syndrome, radiculopathies, or radicular pain are the most common peripheral neuropathies and also the most common cause for neuropathic pain. Despite their high prevalence, they often remain challenging to diagnose and manage in a clinical setting. Summarising the evidence from both preclinical and clinical studies, this review provides an update on the aetiology and pathophysiology of entrapment neuropathies. Potenzial mechanisms are put in perspective with clinical findings. The contemporary assessment is discussed and diagnostic pitfalls highlighted. The evidence for the noninvasive and surgical management of common entrapment neuropathies is summarised and future areas of research are identified.

Sources of Individual Differences in Pain

Pain is an immense clinical and societal challenge, and the key to understanding and treating it is variability. Robust interindividual differences are consistently observed in pain sensitivity, susceptibility to developing painful disorders, and response to analgesic manipulations. This review examines the causes of this variability, including both organismic and environmental sources. Chronic pain development is a textbook example of a gene-environment interaction, requiring both chance initiating events (e.g., trauma, infection) and more immutable risk factors. The focus is on genetic factors, since twin studies have determined that a plurality of the variance likely derives from inherited genetic variants, but sex, age, ethnicity, personality variables, and environmental factors are also considered.

Genome-wide Association Analysis Across 16,956 Patients Identifies a Novel Genetic Association Between BMP6, NIPAL1, CNGA1 and Spondylosis

STUDY DESIGN

A case-control genome-wide association study (GWAS) on spondylosis.

OBJECTIVE

Leveraging Geisinger's MyCode initiative's multimodal dataset, we aimed to identify genetic associations with degenerative spine disease.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Degenerative spine conditions are a leading cause of global disability; however, the genetic underpinnings of these conditions remain under-investigated. Previous studies using candidate-gene approach suggest a genetic risk for degenerative spine conditions, but large-scale GWASs are lacking.

METHODS

We identified 4434 patients with a diagnosis of spondylosis using ICD diagnosis codes with genotype data available. We identified a population-based control of 12,522 patients who did not have any diagnosis for osteoarthritis. A linear-mix, additive genetic model was employed to perform the genetic association tests adjusting for age, sex, and genetic principal components to account for the population structure and relatedness. Gene-based association tests were performed and heritability and genetic correlations with other traits were investigated.

RESULTS

We identified a genome-wide significant locus at rs12190551 (odds ratio = 1.034, 95% confidence interval 1.022-1.046, P = 8.5 × 10-9, minor allele frequency = 36.9%) located in the intron of BMP6. Additionally, NIPAL1 and CNGA1 achieved Bonferroni significance in the gene-based association tests. The estimated heritability was 7.19%. Furthermore, significant genetic correlations with pain, depression, lumbar spine bone mineral density, and osteoarthritis were identified.

CONCLUSION

We demonstrated the use of a massive database of genotypes combined with electronic health record data to identify a novel and significant association spondylosis. We also identified significant genetic correlations with pain, depression, bone mineral density, and osteoarthritis, suggesting shared genetic etiology and molecular pathways with these phenotypes.Level of Evidence: N/A.

Clinical and genetic features of PEHO and PEHO-Like syndromes: A scoping review

Progressive encephalopathy with edema, hypsarrhythmia, and optic atrophy (PEHO) syndrome is a genetic neurological condition characterized by extreme cerebellar atrophy. PEHO-Like syndrome is comparable to PEHO syndrome, with the exception that there is no typical neuro-radiologic or neuro-ophthalmic findings. PEHO spectrum disorders are highly clinically and genetically heterogeneous, and this has challenged their diagnosis. This scoping review aims to summarize and discuss common clinical and genetic features of these syndromes to help future researches. This study was performed according to a six-stage methodology structure and PRISMA guideline. A systematic search of seven databases was performed to find eligible publications prior to June 2020. Articles screening and data extraction were independently performed by two reviewers and quantitative and qualitative analyses were conducted. Thirty-eight articles were identified that fulfill the inclusion criteria. Cerebellar atrophy was the main clinical difference between the two groups but data on optic atrophy and infantile spasms/hypsarrhythmia were not consistent with the previously essential diagnostic criteria. Genetic analysis was performed in several studies, leading to identification of pathogenic variants in different genes that caused these conditions due to different mechanisms. Genetic studies could revolutionize the diagnosis process and our understanding of the etiology of this challenging group of patients by providing targeted sequencing panels and exome- or genome-scale studies in the future.

Polygenic risk scores indicates genetic overlap between peripheral pain syndromes and chronic postsurgical pain

Chronic postsurgical pain (CPSP) is a debilitating chronic pain condition that has a substantial effect on quality of life. CPSP shows considerable clinical overlap with different chronic peripheral pain syndromes, suggesting a shared aetiology. This study aims to assess the genetic overlap between different chronic pain syndromes and CPSP, providing relevant biological context for potential chronic pain markers of CPSP. To analyse the genetic overlap between CPSP and chronic peripheral pain syndromes, recent GWAS studies were combined for polygenic risk scores (PRS) analysis, using a cohort of CPSP patients as starting point. Biological contextualisation of genetic marker, overlap between CPSP and chronic pain syndromes, was assessed through Gene Ontology (GO), using Pathway Scoring Algorithm (PASCAL) and REVIGO. PRS analyses suggest a significant genetic overlap between CPSP and 3 chronic pain disorders: chronic widespread pain (CWP, p value threshold = 0.003, R2 0.06, p = 0.003), rheumatoid arthritis (RA, p value threshold = 0.0177, R2 = 0.04, p = 0.017) and possibly sciatica (p value threshold = 0.00025, R2 = 0.03, p = 0.045). Whereas no significant genetic overlap was found with cluster headache and migraine, the outcome for osteoarthritis (OA) was inconsistent between the cohorts. This is likely related to cohort composition, as repeated random reallocation of patients' nullified CPSP/OA outcome variation between the discovery and replication cohorts. GO analyses suggested an aetiological involvement of genetic markers that control neurological signalling (specifically sodium channels) and inflammatory response. The current study reaffirms the impact of sample size, cohort composition and open data accessibility on the unbiased identification of genetic overlap across disorders. In conclusion, this study is the first to report genetic overlap between regulatory processes implicated in CPSP and chronic peripheral pain syndromes. Interaction between neurological signalling and inflammatory response may explain the genetic overlap between CPSP, CWP and RA. Enhanced understanding of mechanisms underlying chronification of pain will aid the development of new therapeutic strategies for CPSP with sodium channel biochemistry as a potential candidate.

Entrapment neuropathies: a contemporary approach to pathophysiology, clinical assessment, and management

Entrapment neuropathies such as carpal tunnel syndrome, radiculopathies, or radicular pain are the most common peripheral neuropathies and also the most common cause for neuropathic pain. Despite their high prevalence, they often remain challenging to diagnose and manage in a clinical setting. Summarising the evidence from both preclinical and clinical studies, this review provides an update on the aetiology and pathophysiology of entrapment neuropathies. Potential mechanisms are put in perspective with clinical findings. The contemporary assessment is discussed and diagnostic pitfalls highlighted. The evidence for the noninvasive and surgical management of common entrapment neuropathies is summarised and future areas of research are identified.

Analysis of genetically independent phenotypes identifies shared genetic factors associated with chronic musculoskeletal pain conditions

Chronic musculoskeletal pain affects all aspects of human life. However, mechanisms of its genetic control remain poorly understood. Genetic studies of pain are complicated by the high complexity and heterogeneity of pain phenotypes. Here, we apply principal component analysis to reduce phenotype heterogeneity of chronic musculoskeletal pain at four locations: the back, neck/shoulder, hip, and knee. Using matrices of genetic covariances, we constructed four genetically independent phenotypes (GIPs) with the leading GIP (GIP1) explaining 78.4% of the genetic variance of the analyzed conditions, and GIP2–4 explain progressively less. We identified and replicated five GIP1-associated loci and one GIP2-associated locus and prioritized the most likely causal genes. For GIP1, we showed enrichment with multiple nervous system-related terms and genetic correlations with anthropometric, sociodemographic, psychiatric/personality traits and osteoarthritis. We suggest that GIP1 represents a biopsychological component of chronic musculoskeletal pain, related to physiological and psychological aspects and reflecting pain perception and processing.

Yakov Tsepilov, Maxim Freidin et al. find that chronic musculoskeletal pain conditions at four distinct anatomical sites share a common genetic background. The authors constructed genetically independent phenotypes (GIP) from principal components analysis of the different pain phenotypes and used the GIPs to perform genome-wide association studies to identify underlying genetic factors.

Intervertebral Disc Biology: Genetic Basis of Disc Degeneration

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review aims to highlight recent advances in understanding the genetic basis of intervertebral disc degeneration (IDD).

RECENT FINDINGS

It has been known for some time that IDD is highly heritable. Recent studies, and in particular the availability of agnostic techniques such as genome-wide association studies, have identified new variants in a variety of genes which contribute to the risk of IDD and to back pain.

SUMMARY

A variety of genetic variants are involved in IDD. Some are shared with variants predisposing to back pain, but few have been identified reliably in either phenotype. Further research is required to explain fully the high heritability and how the genetic variants influence cell biology to lead to IDD.

Genetic Insights Into Frailty: Association of 9p21-23 Locus With Frailty

Frailty is a complex aging phenotype associated with increased vulnerability to disability and death. Understanding the biological antecedents of frailty may provide clues to healthy aging. The genome-wide association study hotspot, 9p21-23 region, is a risk locus for a number of age-related complex disorders associated with frailty. Hence, we conducted an association study to examine whether variations in 9p21-23 locus plays a role in the pathogenesis of frailty in 637 community-dwelling Ashkenazi Jewish adults aged 65 and older enrolled in the LonGenity study. The strongest association with frailty (adjusted for age and gender) was found with the SNP rs518054 (odds ratio: 1.635, 95% CI = 1.241-2.154; p-value: 4.81 × 10^-04) intergenic and located between LOC105375977 and C9orf146. The prevalence of four SNPs (rs1324192, rs7019262, rs518054, and rs571221) risk alleles haplotype in this region was significantly higher (compared with other haplotypes) in frail older adults compared with non-frail older adults (29.7 vs. 20.8%, p = 0.0005, respectively). Functional analyses using in silico approaches placed rs518054 in the CTCF binding site as well as DNase hypersensitive region. Furthermore, rs518054 was found to be in an enhancer site of NFIB gene located downstream. NFIB is a transcription factor that promotes cell differentiation during development, has antiapoptotic effect, maintains stem cell populations in adult tissues, and also acts as epigenetic regulators. Our study found novel association of SNPs in the regulatory region in the 9p21-23 region with the frailty phenotype; signifying the importance of this locus in aging.