Species-free species distribution models describe macroecological properties of protected area networks

Impacts of environmental flow regulation on survival of aquatic organisms: a case study of Cyprinus Carpio in Baiyangdian, China

Decreasing water volume and increasing pollutants in wetlands pose challenges to aquatic life. While environmental flow regulation is widely applied to enhance aquatic habitats, its effectiveness needs to be evaluated. In this study, a hydrodynamic-water quality model was used to simulate the fields of flow, temperature, and pollutants. The Ecological Niche Modeling at the MetaLand EcologyLab (ENMTML) was utilized to evaluate the area of suitable habitats for aquatic organisms under both environmental flow regulation and no environmental flow regulation conditions. The typical Baiyangdian Wetland in northern China was taken as the study area, and the important economic fish, Cyprinus carpio, served as the indicator of aquatic species. The effectiveness of environmental flow regulation was evaluated from December 1, 2017, to June 30, 2018. The results indicated that the variables of water depth, dissolved oxygen (DO), ammonia nitrogen (NH4+-N) and Chlorophyll a (Chla) were the major environmental factors determining the variability of the suitable habitat area for Cyprinus carpio. The environmental flow regulation capacity of the Baiyangdian Wetland was 2.6 [Formula: see text] 108 m3, which produced a suitable habitat area of 135.538 km2 at the end of the water supply period. Compared with the no environmental flow regulation condition, the highly and moderately suitable habitat areas for Cyprinus carpio were enlarged by 56.30 km2 and 34.11 km2, respectively. The outcome provides not only a basic reference for wetland management, but also a scientific perspective for understanding the impact of environmental flow regulation on aquatic organisms. The proposed method demonstrates the important potential of evaluating the effectiveness of environmental flow regulation on aquatic organisms in wetlands.

Old Processes, New Movements: The Inclusion of Geodiversity in Biological and Ecological Discourse

There exists substantial variation in the qualitative and quantitative interpretations of the concept of geodiversity and its embedded elements and values. The resulting divergence and ambiguity in applications of the term constrain its present use as an operationalized concept in nature conservation research and discourse, unlike its seemingly analogous biotic term, ‘biodiversity’. This paper presents findings from a critical literature review of 299 academic journal articles and texts that define geodiversity values, or otherwise incorporate geodiversity or its derived elements and values as components of conservation. Contrary to previous suggestions, we have found that most geoscientists have united behind a single definition of geodiversity and applied it frequently in their primary and applied, geotouristic, research. Qualitative elements of geodiversity, including system support values and aesthetic appeals within nature conservation, have been largely confined to geoconservation and geoscientific literature and are nearly absent from biological discourse. Encouragingly, however, we have observed a more recent increase in research pertaining to quantitative interpretations of abiotic geodiversity elements and their relationship with the spatial distribution and abundance of species. Although the inclusion of geodiversity elements (quantitative and qualitative) in conservation assessment and biodiversity research has been and remains far less universal than for biodiversity elements, there is strong potential for further unification of these two concepts, especially though collaborative quantitative research. The more that geodiversity is discussed outside of geographic and geoscientific disciplines, broader recognition and validated use of the concept of geodiversity will be used in the understanding, interpretation, and protection of patterns and processes at the landscape scale.