1
|
Yang J, Giummarra M, Picco L, Arnold C, Nielsen S. Clinical and mental health characteristics among patients receiving medications for opioid use disorder treatment versus patients receiving low- and high-dose opioids when referred for pain management. PAIN MEDICINE (MALDEN, MASS.) 2025; 26:237-247. [PMID: 39937261 PMCID: PMC12046219 DOI: 10.1093/pm/pnaf011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/29/2024] [Revised: 12/09/2024] [Accepted: 12/30/2024] [Indexed: 02/13/2025]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To examine the demographic and clinical characteristics of patients attending pain management services who were receiving opioid agonist treatment (ie, methadone or buprenorphine for the treatment of opioid use disorder) in comparison with those taking prescription opioid analgesics in oral morphine equivalent daily doses at low (<40 mg) and high doses (>100 mg) in a national database from the electronic Persistent Pain Outcomes Collaboration (ePPOC) in Australia. DESIGN A cross-sectional study. SETTING Australian pain services. SUBJECTS Adult patients referred to Australian pain service clinics between 2016 and 2021. METHODS Multinomial and bivariate logistic regression models were conducted to compare the demographic and clinical characteristics of patients on opioid agonist treatment and those taking other prescription opioid analgesics. RESULTS Among 42 182 participants, most were female (56.8%), with a mean age of 51.7 years. People on opioid agonist treatment (n = 1016) and high-dose opioids (n = 7122) were similar in that they both had more severe mental health symptoms and longer pain duration than the low-dose group (n = 20 517). Compared with the high-dose group, people on opioid agonist treatment had reduced odds of reporting more severe pain intensity but increased odds of having multimorbidity, more severe anxiety, and pain catastrophizing thoughts. CONCLUSIONS These findings highlight the need for mental health treatment and the necessity of tailored multidisciplinary pain management for people in opioid agonist treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jie Yang
- Monash Addiction Research Centre, Eastern Health Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria 3199, Australia
| | - Melita Giummarra
- Caulfield Pain Management and Research Centre, Caulfield Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria 3162, Australia
- Department of Neuroscience, Central Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria 3004, Australia
| | - Louisa Picco
- Monash Addiction Research Centre, Eastern Health Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria 3199, Australia
| | - Carolyn Arnold
- Caulfield Pain Management and Research Centre, Caulfield Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria 3162, Australia
- Department of Anaesthesia and Perioperative Medicine, Central Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria 3004, Australia
| | - Suzanne Nielsen
- Monash Addiction Research Centre, Eastern Health Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria 3199, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Walker TJ, Mohankumar R, Kraus SW, Cotton BP, Renn BN. Mental and physical health characteristics of older and younger adults receiving medication for opioid use disorder. Front Public Health 2024; 12:1418690. [PMID: 39600404 PMCID: PMC11588491 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1418690] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/16/2024] [Accepted: 09/30/2024] [Indexed: 11/29/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Methadone is an effective and widely used medication for opioid use disorder (MOUD). Within in the United States (US), older adults represent an increasing proportion of those receiving MOUD, yet little is known about characteristics of older individuals in these programs. Objectives To evaluate mental and physical health characteristics of younger and older adults receiving MOUD and test whether age moderates the relation between physical and mental health variables. Methods Data for this secondary analysis are drawn from a cross-sectional survey of a convenience sample of individuals seeking methadone dosing as part of MOUD at four opioid treatment programs in two regions of the US. Descriptive statistics and correlational and moderation analyses examined outcomes of pain severity, pain interference, self-rated health, physical activity, depression, and anxiety across younger (18-49) and older (50+ years) participants. Results Analyses included 469 participants (mean [range] age, 41.01 [20-70] years). Older participants reported higher pain severity and interference, less physical activity, and worse self-rated health than those in the younger age group (ps < 0.05). Associations between mental and physical health variables were generally weak-to-moderate in the older age group (r = 0.26 to r = 0.44, p < 0.01), and weak in the younger age group, although age did not moderate associations. Conclusion Clinically significant mental and physical health variables are associated among individuals receiving methadone for MOUD, with older adults facing unique challenges. Clinical implications Opioid use treatment should include not only pain management but also assessment and treatment of depression and anxiety and optimization of other health behaviors (e.g., physical activity) across age groups. Pain management and health promotion are particularly relevant targets for aging individuals receiving MOUD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Teresa J. Walker
- Department of Psychology, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, NV, United States
| | | | - Shane W. Kraus
- Department of Psychology, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, NV, United States
| | - Brandi P. Cotton
- Department of Psychiatry, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States
| | - Brenna N. Renn
- Department of Psychology, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, NV, United States
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Yang J, Jung M, Picco L, Grist E, Lloyd-Jones M, Giummarra M, Nielsen S. Pain in people seeking and receiving opioid agonist treatment: A systematic review and meta-analysis of prevalence and correlates. Addiction 2024; 119:1879-1901. [PMID: 38886901 DOI: 10.1111/add.16574] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/18/2023] [Accepted: 04/22/2024] [Indexed: 06/20/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS People with opioid use disorder (OUD) commonly experience pain including chronic pain. Despite the high prevalence, few studies have systematically examined the prevalence and correlates of pain among people seeking or receiving opioid agonist treatment (OAT) for OUD. This review aimed to determine the prevalence of pain in this population globally, and estimate the association between chronic pain and other demographic and clinical characteristics. METHODS Electronic searches were conducted in three databases (Medline, Embase and PsycINFO) from the inception until October 2022. Eligible studies reported prevalence rates of current and/or chronic pain. Meta-analyses examining the main prevalence estimates were conducted by Stata SE 18.0, and comorbid clinical conditions were analysed by Review Manager 5.4. RESULTS Fifty-six studies (n participants = 35 267) from sixty-seven publications were included. Prevalence estimates of current and chronic pain were reported in 27 (48.2%) and 40 studies (71.4%), respectively. Most studies were conducted in North America (71.4%, n = 40) and used cross-sectional designs (64.3%, n = 36). Meta-analyses revealed a pooled prevalence of 60.0% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 52.0-68.0) for current pain and 44.0% [95% CI: 40.0-49.0] for chronic pain. Chronic pain was positively associated with older age (mean deviation of mean age: 2.39 years, 95% CI: 1.40-3.37; I2 = 43%), unemployment (odds ratio [OR] = 0.57, 95% CI: 0.42-0.76; I2 = 78%), more severe mental health symptoms (e.g. more severe depression (standardised mean difference [SMD] of mean scores: 0.45, 95% CI: 0.20-0.70; I2 = 48%) and anxiety symptoms (SMD: 0.52, 95% CI: 0.17-0.88; I2 = 67%), and hepatitis C (OR = 1.41, 95% CI: 1.03-1.94; I2 = 0%). No association was observed between chronic pain and the onset and type of OAT, geographic location, study design, survey year, participant age or use of specific pain assessment tools. CONCLUSIONS There appears to be a high prevalence of pain among people seeking or receiving opioid agonist treatment for opioid use disorder compared with the general population, with positive associations for older age, unemployment, hepatitis C and the severity of some mental health symptoms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jie Yang
- Monash Addiction Research Centre, Eastern Health Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Monica Jung
- Monash Addiction Research Centre, Eastern Health Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Louisa Picco
- Monash Addiction Research Centre, Eastern Health Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Elizabeth Grist
- Monash Addiction Research Centre, Eastern Health Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | | | - Melita Giummarra
- Central Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Suzanne Nielsen
- Monash Addiction Research Centre, Eastern Health Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Avery N, McNeilage AG, Stanaway F, Ashton-James CE, Blyth FM, Martin R, Gholamrezaei A, Glare P. Efficacy of interventions to reduce long term opioid treatment for chronic non-cancer pain: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ 2022; 377:e066375. [PMID: 35379650 PMCID: PMC8977989 DOI: 10.1136/bmj-2021-066375] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/15/2022] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To review interventions to reduce long term opioid treatment in people with chronic non-cancer pain, considering efficacy on dose reduction and discontinuation, pain, function, quality of life, withdrawal symptoms, substance use, and adverse events. DESIGN Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials and non-randomised studies of interventions. DATA SOURCES Medline, Embase, PsycINFO, CINAHL, and the Cochrane Library searched from inception to July 2021. Reference lists and previous reviews were also searched and experts were contacted. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR STUDY SELECTION Original research in English. Case reports and cross sectional studies were excluded. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS Two authors independently selected studies, extracted data, and used the Cochrane risk-of-bias tools for randomised and non-randomised studies (RoB 2 and ROBINS-I). Authors grouped interventions into five categories (pain self-management, complementary and alternative medicine, pharmacological and biomedical devices and interventions, opioid replacement treatment, and deprescription methods), estimated pooled effects using random effects meta-analytical models, and appraised the certainty of evidence using GRADE (grading of recommendations, assessment, development, and evaluation). RESULTS Of 166 studies meeting inclusion criteria, 130 (78%) were considered at critical risk of bias and were excluded from the evidence synthesis. Of the 36 included studies, few had comparable treatment arms and sample sizes were generally small. Consequently, the certainty of the evidence was low or very low for more than 90% (41/44) of GRADE outcomes, including for all non-opioid patient outcomes. Despite these limitations, evidence of moderate certainty indicated that interventions to support prescribers' adherence to guidelines increased the likelihood of patients discontinuing opioid treatment (adjusted odds ratio 1.5, 95% confidence interval 1.0 to 2.1), and that these prescriber interventions as well as pain self-management programmes reduced opioid dose more than controls (intervention v control, mean difference -6.8 mg (standard error 1.6) daily oral morphine equivalent, P<0.001; pain programme v control, -14.31 mg daily oral morphine equivalent, 95% confidence interval -21.57 to -7.05). CONCLUSIONS Evidence on the reduction of long term opioid treatment for chronic pain continues to be constrained by poor study methodology. Of particular concern is the lack of evidence relating to possible harms. Agreed standards for designing and reporting studies on the reduction of opioid treatment are urgently needed. REVIEW REGISTRATION PROSPERO CRD42020140943.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicholas Avery
- Sydney Medical School, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Pain Management Research Institute, Kolling Institute, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Amy G McNeilage
- Sydney Medical School, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Pain Management Research Institute, Kolling Institute, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Fiona Stanaway
- School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Claire E Ashton-James
- Sydney Medical School, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Pain Management Research Institute, Kolling Institute, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Fiona M Blyth
- Pain Management Research Institute, Kolling Institute, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Rebecca Martin
- Michael J Cousins Pain Management and Research Centre, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Ali Gholamrezaei
- Sydney Medical School, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Latif ZEH, Skjaervø I, Solli KK, Tanum L. Chronic Pain Among Patients With an Opioid Use Disorder. Am J Addict 2021; 30:366-375. [PMID: 33738870 DOI: 10.1111/ajad.13153] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/17/2020] [Revised: 12/01/2020] [Accepted: 01/05/2021] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Chronic pain is not well understood in opioid-dependent populations. We report the prevalence of chronic pain and pain characteristics in an opioid-dependent population by treatment type and gender. METHODS This cross-sectional study opportunistically recruited 569 patients (32% women) receiving treatment for opioid use disorder (DSM-5) in Norway during 2016-2018 (83% received opioid maintenance treatment, 17% received treatment without medication). We asked about chronic pain (≥3 months; ICD-11), pain severity (NRS-11), and other pain characteristics. RESULTS Overall, 55% reported chronic pain (≥3 months), with a higher prevalence among women (61% vs 52%, P = .041) and patients receiving methadone (66%) compared with buprenorphine or no medication (46% and 45%, P < .001). Chronic pain was associated with higher age (P < .001) and higher doses of methadone (P = .048). The average duration of pain was 11 years. The most frequently reported pain locations were the lower extremities (59%) and the back (54%), and 69% reported more than one pain location. Constant pain and migrating pain were significantly associated with both moderate (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 2.04, confidence interval [CI]: 1.12-3.74 and aOR: 2.44, CI: 1.09-5.43) and severe pain intensity (aOR: 2.08, CI: 1.14-3.80 and aOR: 2.46, CI: 1.10-5.47). Reporting no effect of analgesics was associated with severe pain intensity (aOR: 0.54, CI: 0.29-0.99). CONCLUSIONS AND SCIENTIFIC SIGNIFICANCE Over half reported chronic pain, and rates were highest among women and patients receiving methadone. New contributions to the field are descriptions of pain characteristics by gender and pain severity, and interactions between medication type and age. (© 2021 The Authors. The American Journal on Addictions published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of The American Academy of Addiction Psychiatry). (Am J Addict 2021;00:00-00).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zill-E Huma Latif
- Department of Research and Development in Mental Health Service, Akershus University Hospital, Lørenskog, Norway
| | - Ingeborg Skjaervø
- Department of Research and Development in Mental Health Service, Akershus University Hospital, Lørenskog, Norway.,Norwegian Centre for Violence and Traumatic Stress Studies, Oslo, Norway
| | - Kristin K Solli
- Department of Research and Development in Mental Health Service, Akershus University Hospital, Lørenskog, Norway.,Norwegian Centre for Addiction Research, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.,Vestfold Hospital Trust, Tønsberg, Norway
| | - Lars Tanum
- Department of Research and Development in Mental Health Service, Akershus University Hospital, Lørenskog, Norway.,Faculty for Health Science, Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Self-Rated Physical Health and Unmet Healthcare Needs among Swedish Patients in Opioid Substitution Treatment. JOURNAL OF ADDICTION 2019; 2019:7942145. [PMID: 31139491 PMCID: PMC6500657 DOI: 10.1155/2019/7942145] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/11/2019] [Accepted: 03/25/2019] [Indexed: 01/16/2023]
Abstract
Background Individuals with opioid dependence are at increased risk of deteriorating health due to the lifestyle connected to heroin use. Barriers surrounding the healthcare system seem to hinder patients to seek help through conventional healthcare, even after entering opioid substitution treatment (OST), resulting in a high level of unmet healthcare needs. However, this field is still unexplored, with only a few studies focusing on general health within this population. The first step, in order to provide suitable and accessible primary healthcare, is to assess the extent of physical symptoms and unmet healthcare needs within the OST population, which, to this point, has been sparsely studied. Aim To assess OST patients' self-rated physical health and healthcare seeking behaviour. Methods Two-hundred and eighteen patients from four different OST sites answered a questionnaire regarding physical health and healthcare seeking. Results Patients in OST have a high degree of physical symptoms and a high degree of unmet healthcare needs. Sixty-six percent reported suffering from musculoskeletal pain. Fifty-six percent reported gastrointestinal symptoms. Genital problems and airway symptoms were reported by 47%, respectively, and dental problems were reported by 69% of the respondents. General unmet healthcare needs were reported by 82%. Musculoskeletal pain was positively correlated with having an unstable housing situation (AOR 4.26 [95% CI 1.73-10.48]), negatively correlated with male sex (AOR 0.45 [95% CI 0.22-0.91]), and positively correlated with age (AOR 1.04 [95% CI 1.01-1.07]). No statistically significant correlates of respiratory, gastrointestinal, genital, or dental symptoms were found. Conclusion Patients in OST carry a heavy burden of physical symptoms and unmet healthcare needs, potentially due to societal barriers. Patients' frequent visits to the OST clinics offer a unique opportunity to build a base for easily accessible on-site primary healthcare.
Collapse
|
7
|
Zhong BL, Xu YM, Zhu JH, Li HJ. Sexual life satisfaction of methadone-maintained Chinese patients: individuals with pain are dissatisfied with their sex lives. J Pain Res 2018; 11:1789-1794. [PMID: 30237733 PMCID: PMC6137950 DOI: 10.2147/jpr.s177564] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/02/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Pain is potentially associated with sexual dysfunction. Both sexual dysfunction and pain are common in methadone-maintained patients, but the association of pain with sexual dysfunction in methadone-maintained patients is rarely studied. This study examined the association between pain and sexual life satisfaction (SLS) in Chinese patients receiving methadone maintenance treatment (MMT). PATIENTS AND METHODS A total of 477 methadone-maintained patients who recently had sex with their sex partners were recruited from three MMT clinics in Wuhan, China. SLS was assessed with a single question, and the sociodemographic, psychological, and clinical data were collected with standardized questionnaires. Pain intensity was assessed with the 5-point verbal rating scale. Multiple ordinary logistic regression was used to control for potential confounders that may bias the pain-SLS relationship. RESULTS The prevalence of self-reported dissatisfaction with one's sexual life was significantly higher in patients with clinically significant pain (CSP) than those without CSP (41.5% vs 19.4%, χ2 =23.567, P<0.001). After controlling for potential sociodemographic, psychological, and clinical confounders, CSP was still significantly and independently associated with an increase in sexual life dissatisfaction (OR =1.89, P=0.011). CONCLUSION Pain is significantly associated with low SLS in methadone-maintained patients. Appropriate pain management might improve SLS of patients receiving MMT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bao-Liang Zhong
- Research Center for Psychological and Health Sciences, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan, Hubei Province, China
- Affiliated Wuhan Mental Health Center, Tongji Medical College of Huazhong University of Science & Technology, Wuhan, Hubei Province, China,
| | - Yan-Min Xu
- Affiliated Wuhan Mental Health Center, Tongji Medical College of Huazhong University of Science & Technology, Wuhan, Hubei Province, China,
| | - Jun-Hong Zhu
- Affiliated Wuhan Mental Health Center, Tongji Medical College of Huazhong University of Science & Technology, Wuhan, Hubei Province, China,
| | - Hong-Jie Li
- Affiliated Wuhan Mental Health Center, Tongji Medical College of Huazhong University of Science & Technology, Wuhan, Hubei Province, China,
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Abstract
The current opioid crisis highlights an urgent need for better paradigms for prevention and treatment of chronic pain and addiction. Although many approach this complex clinical condition with the question, "Is this pain or is this addiction?," it is more than the sum of its parts. Chronic pain among those with dependence and addiction often evolves into a complex disabling condition with pain at multiple sites, psychosocial dysfunctions, medical and psychiatric disorders, polypharmacy, and polysubstance use, all interacting with each other in complex ways (multimorbidity). The authors offer an integrative therapeutic approach to manage this complex clinical scenario.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ajay Manhapra
- Veteran Affairs New England Mental Illness Research, Education and Clinical Center (MIRECC), West Haven, CT, USA; Advanced PACT Pain Clinic, VA Hampton Medical Center, 100 Emancipation Drive, PRIME 5, Hampton, VA 23667, USA; Department of Psychiatry, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
| | - William C Becker
- Opioid Reassessment Clinic, VA Connecticut Healthcare System, 950 Campbell Avenue, Mailstop 151B, West Haven, CT 06516, USA; Pain Research, Informatics, Multimorbidities and Education (PRIME) Center, West Haven, CT, USA; Department of Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Delorme J, Chenaf C, Bertin C, Riquelme M, Eschalier A, Ardid D, Authier N. Chronic Pain Opioid-Maintained Patients Receive Less Analgesic Opioid Prescriptions. Front Psychiatry 2018; 9:335. [PMID: 30083113 PMCID: PMC6065119 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2018.00335] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2018] [Accepted: 07/02/2018] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Treating pain and opioid use disorder represents a clinical challenge. While most studies that have assessed opioid analgesic use in opioid substitution treatment (OST) patients primarily address opioid analgesic misuse (1, 2), only few studies focused on OST patients assessed the prescription of analgesic opioids for chronic pain. We sought to compare the prevalence of analgesic opioid prescription (AOP) in two groups of chronic non-cancer pain (CNCP) patients: OST patients vs. the general population. This was a population-based cross-sectional study based on the French national healthcare claims database SNIIRAM (Système National d'Informations Inter-Régimes de l'Assurance Maladie) covering over 66 million people (98.8% of the French population). Overall, 67,173 participants ≥15 years old undergoing continuous OST in 2015 ("OST patients" group) were included and age- and gender-matched by means of a 1:1 ratio with 67,173 patients without OST ("control" group). In each group, patients with cancer conditions were excluded and those having received opioid and non-opioid analgesics for at least 3 months were identified (CNCP patients). Compared to control patients, CNCP OST patients received less AOP (47.8 vs. 68.0%, p < 0.0001) and more often non-opioid prescription (52.2 vs. 32.0%, p < 0.0001). In multivariate analysis, CNCP OST patients were 2.7 times less likely to be prescribed analgesic opioids (adjusted odds ratio [OR] = 2.7 [2.42-3.01], p < 0.0001) than control patients. AOP correlated in CNCP OST patients with: age ≤ 40 years old, female gender, low-income status, methadone-maintained treatment, mental health disorder, hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection, and alcohol abuse disorder. Opioid analgesics were less often prescribed in CNCP OST patients. AOP prevalence was 2.7-fold lower than in the general population. Chronic pain management in OST patients needs to be reinforced through additional physician training and a multidisciplinary approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jessica Delorme
- Université Clermont Auvergne, CHU Clermont-Ferrand, Inserm, Neuro-Dol, Service de Pharmacologie médicale, Centres Addictovigilance et Pharmacovigilance, Centre Evaluation et Traitement de la Douleur, Clermont-Ferrand, France.,Observatoire Français des Médicaments Antalgiques/French Monitoring Centre for Analgesic Drugs, Université Clermont Auvergne - CHU Clermont-Ferrand, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - Chouki Chenaf
- Université Clermont Auvergne, CHU Clermont-Ferrand, Inserm, Neuro-Dol, Service de Pharmacologie médicale, Centres Addictovigilance et Pharmacovigilance, Centre Evaluation et Traitement de la Douleur, Clermont-Ferrand, France.,Observatoire Français des Médicaments Antalgiques/French Monitoring Centre for Analgesic Drugs, Université Clermont Auvergne - CHU Clermont-Ferrand, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - Celian Bertin
- Université Clermont Auvergne, CHU Clermont-Ferrand, Inserm, Neuro-Dol, Service de Pharmacologie médicale, Centres Addictovigilance et Pharmacovigilance, Centre Evaluation et Traitement de la Douleur, Clermont-Ferrand, France.,Observatoire Français des Médicaments Antalgiques/French Monitoring Centre for Analgesic Drugs, Université Clermont Auvergne - CHU Clermont-Ferrand, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - Marie Riquelme
- Université Clermont Auvergne, CHU Clermont-Ferrand, Inserm, Neuro-Dol, Service de Pharmacologie médicale, Centres Addictovigilance et Pharmacovigilance, Centre Evaluation et Traitement de la Douleur, Clermont-Ferrand, France.,Observatoire Français des Médicaments Antalgiques/French Monitoring Centre for Analgesic Drugs, Université Clermont Auvergne - CHU Clermont-Ferrand, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - Alain Eschalier
- Université Clermont Auvergne, CHU Clermont-Ferrand, Inserm, Neuro-Dol, Service de Pharmacologie médicale, Centres Addictovigilance et Pharmacovigilance, Centre Evaluation et Traitement de la Douleur, Clermont-Ferrand, France.,Faculté de Médecine, Institut Analgesia, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - Denis Ardid
- Université Clermont Auvergne, CHU Clermont-Ferrand, Inserm, Neuro-Dol, Service de Pharmacologie médicale, Centres Addictovigilance et Pharmacovigilance, Centre Evaluation et Traitement de la Douleur, Clermont-Ferrand, France.,Faculté de Médecine, Institut Analgesia, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - Nicolas Authier
- Université Clermont Auvergne, CHU Clermont-Ferrand, Inserm, Neuro-Dol, Service de Pharmacologie médicale, Centres Addictovigilance et Pharmacovigilance, Centre Evaluation et Traitement de la Douleur, Clermont-Ferrand, France.,Observatoire Français des Médicaments Antalgiques/French Monitoring Centre for Analgesic Drugs, Université Clermont Auvergne - CHU Clermont-Ferrand, Clermont-Ferrand, France.,Faculté de Médecine, Institut Analgesia, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| |
Collapse
|