Modification and optimization of an established prognostic score after re-irradiation of recurrent glioma.PLoS One. 2017;12:e0180457. [PMID: 28678889 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0180457]

Re-irradiation for recurrent glioblastoma: a pattern of care analysis

BACKGROUND

90% of glioblastomas (GBM) relapse within two years of diagnosis. In contrast to the initial setting, there is no standard management for recurrent disease and options include hypofractionated stereotactic re-irradiation (re-mHSRT). The aims of this study were to investigate re-mHSRT practice in Swiss neuro-oncology centres.

METHODS

A survey of 18 questions regarding re-irradiation for GBM was created and distributed electronically (SurveyMonkey, USA) to 11 radiation oncologists in Switzerland specialising in brain tumours. We evaluated the clinical outcomes of a multicentre series of patients treated with an established re-mHSRT schedule to benchmark these against the literature and investigated the radiological patterns of relapse after re-mHSRT.

RESULTS

8 of 11 (73%) radiation oncologists responded to the survey and re-irradiation practice was heterogeneous. The 10 × 3.5 Gy schedule (RTOG 1205, BRIOChe trials) was used by 5/8 respondents and 47/50 patients with recurrent GBM treated with re-mHSRT with this schedule in daily practice were included in the analysis. The median time to re-mHSRT following completion of adjuvant RT was 23.3 (7-224) months. The median PTV at re-mHSRT was 22.0 cm3 (0.9-190). Combined CTV + PTV margins ranged from 0 to 10 mm and median prescription isodose was 80% (67-100). 14/47 (30%) patients received temozolomide and four (8.5%) continued bevacizumab concomitantly. On multivariable analysis, concomitant systemic therapy predicted for progression-free survival (PFS), HR 2.87 (95% CI 1-03-7.96), p = 0.042. Median PFS following re-mHSRT was 6.6 (0.2-92.5) months and 26/47 patients (55%) received subsequent systemic therapy. The median overall survival (OS) following recurrence was 11.8 months (1.5-92.5), similar to the 10.8 months in the literature with the same schedule. The six-month OS rate was 37/47 (79%), which compares well with the 73% reported in a meta-analysis of 50 publications employing various schedules. In a subgroup analysis of 36/47 (79%) patients with MR follow-up after re-mHSRT, 8/36 (22%) had no radiological evidence of tumour progression at a median follow-up of 9.4 months. 21/28 (75%) radiological relapses were in-field, two were marginal and five were out of field.

CONCLUSIONS

Re-mHSRT with 10 × 3.5 Gy can achieve local control in selected patients with recurrent GBM.

Efficacy and Low Toxicity of Normo-Fractionated Re-Irradiation with Combined Chemotherapy for Recurrent Glioblastoma-An Analysis of Treatment Response and Failure

BACKGROUND

Glioblastoma is the most common malignant brain tumor in adults. Even after maximal safe resection and adjuvant chemoradiotherapy, patients normally relapse after a few years or even months. Standard treatment for recurrent glioblastoma is not yet defined, with re-resection, re-irradiation, and systemic therapy playing key roles. Usually, re-irradiation is combined with concurrent chemotherapy, harnessing the radiosensitizing effects of alkylating agents.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of 101 patients with recurrent glioblastoma treated with re-irradiation was conducted, evaluating the survival impact of concurrent chemotherapy regimens, as well as prior resection. Patients were subcategorized according to concurrent chemotherapy (temozolomide vs. CCNU vs. combination of both vs. none) and details are given regarding treatment toxicity and patterns of relapse after first- and second-line treatment.

RESULTS

Patients were treated with normo-fractionated re-irradiation (with prescription dose of ~40 Gy to the PTV), resulting in a moderate cumulative EQD2 (~100 Gy). The mean overall survival was 11.3 months (33.5 months from initial diagnosis) and mean progression free survival was 9.5 months. Prior resection resulted in increased survival (p < 0.001), especially when gross total resection was achieved. Patients who received concurrent chemotherapy had significantly longer survival vs. no chemotherapy (p < 0.01), with the combination of CCNU and TMZ achieving the best results. Overall survival was significantly better in patients who received the CCNU + TMZ combination at any time during treatment (first or second line) vs. monotherapy only. The treatment of larger volumes (mean PTV size = 112.7 cm3) was safe and did not result in worse prognosis or increased demand for corticosteroids. Overall, the incidence of high-grade toxicity or sequential radionecrosis (5%) was reasonably low and treatment was tolerated well. While second-line chemotherapy did not seem to influence patterns of relapse, patients who received TMZ + CCNU as first-line treatment had a tendency towards better local control with more out-field recurrence.

CONCLUSIONS

Normo-fractionated re-irradiation appears to be safe and is accompanied by good survival outcomes, even when applied to larger treatment volumes. Patients amenable to undergo re-resection and achieving concurrent systemic therapy with alkylating agents had better OS, especially when gross total resection was possible. Based on existing data and experiences reflected in this analysis, we advocate for a multimodal approach to recurrent glioblastoma with maximal safe re-resection and adjuvant second chemoradiation. The combination of TMZ and CCNU for patients with methylated MGMT promoter yielded the best results in the primary and recurrent situation (together with re-RT). Normo-fractionated RT enables the use of more generous margins and is tolerated well.

Advances in the field of developing biomarkers for re-irradiation: a how-to guide to small, powerful data sets and artificial intelligence

Introduction

Patient selection remains challenging as the clinical use of re-irradiation (re-RT) increases. Re-RT data is limited to retrospective studies and small prospective single-institution reports, resulting in small, heterogenous data sets. Validated prognostic and predictive biomarkers are derived from large-volume studies with long-term follow-up. This review aims to examine existing re-RT publications and available data sets and discuss strategies using artificial intelligence (AI) to approach small data sets to optimize the use of re-RT data.

Methods

Re-RT publications were identified where associated public data was present. The existing literature on small data sets to identify biomarkers was also explored.

Results

Publications with associated public data were identified, with glioma and nasopharyngeal cancers emerging as the most common tumor sites where the use of re-RT was the primary management approach. Existing and emerging AI strategies have been used to approach small data sets including data generation, augmentation, discovery, and transfer learning.

Conclusions

Further data is needed to generate adaptive frameworks, improve the collection of specimens for molecular analysis, and improve the interpretability of results in re-RT data.

Validation of Combs prognostic scoring system in Indian recurrent glioma patients treated with re-radiation

PURPOSE

Retrospective audit of recurrent glioma patients treated by different fractionation schedules and to validate the modified Combs prognostic score in Indian patient cohort.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between Jan 2009 and June 2022, 66 recurrent gliomas patients treated with standard adjuvant treatment-radiation (RT) ± temozolomide (chemotherapy)-and re-treated with RT (±chemotherapy) were categorized as per modified Combs prognostic criteria and outcomes were compared.

RESULTS

Sixty-six patients with recurrent gliomas who received reirradiation (re-RT) were audited-53% males; 61% Karnofsky performance status (KPS) ≥80 at time of re-RT; median age 41.5 years (range, 6 to 70 years); 67% <50 years; primary histology low-grade glioma in 33% ; grade III 27%, grade IV 40%; initial median dose of 60 Gy equivalent dose in 2 Gy fractions EQD2; maximum safe resection at recurrence 41%; mean and median follow-up 78 ± 51 months and 66 months. Mean time interval between RT was 46.4 ± 39 months. Mean planning target volume (PTV) volume in conventional RT (Conv-RT), hypofractionated RT (Hypo-RT), and ultra-hypofractionated RT (UF-RT) was 226.1 ± 140.7 mL, 162.8 ± 123.3 mL, and 143.3 ± 145.8 mL. Mean dose for Conv-RT, Hypo-RT, and UF-RT was 50 Gy (range, 40 to 60), 31 Gy (range, 20 to 40), and 20 Gy (range, 10 to 30). Mean overall survival (OS) in Conv-RT, Hypo-RT, and UF-RT cohort was 18.8 months (range, 2.4 to 76.8); 6.6 months (range, 2 to 17.4), and 13.9 months (range, 3 to 131.9). Median OS as per Combs criteria were 16.6 months (Group a), 24.6 months (Group b), 4.6 months (Group c), and 3 months (Group d). Significant survival benefit was with good KPS score (KPS >80 vs. <80; 20.46 vs. 5.25 months; p < 0.001), patients receiving salvage chemotherapy (20.46 vs. 6.96 months; p = 0.001), and patients received re-RT biological equivalent dose BED3 >80 Gy (16.62 vs. 5.48 months; p = 0.03). Median OS in our patient cohort and Combs cohort in Group a was 16.6 and 19.5 months; Group b was 24.6 and 11.3 months; Group c was 4.7 and 8.1 months, and Group d was 2 and 5.5 months, respectively. Six months survival in our patient cohort and Combs cohort in Groups a, b, c, d were 100%, 92%, 34%, 17% and 94%, 79%, 70%, 41%, respectively. Twelve months survival in our patient cohort and Combs cohort in Groups a, b, c, d were 88%, 74%, 22%, 0% and 88%, 47%, 22%, 7%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Modified Combs prognostic factors predicts OS and is applicable in Indian subcontinent patient population.

Re-irradiation for recurrent high-grade glioma: an analysis of prognostic factors for survival and predictors of radiation necrosis

PURPOSE

Recurrent high-grade glioma (rHGG) is a heterogeneous population, and the ideal patient selection for re-irradiation (re-RT) has yet to be established. This study aims to identify prognostic factors for rHGG patients treated with re-RT.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed consecutive adults with rHGG who underwent re-RT from 2009 to 2020 from our institutional database. The primary objective was overall survival (OS). Secondary endpoints included prognostic factors for early death (< 6 months after re-RT) and predictors of radiation necrosis (RN).

RESULTS

For the 79 patients identified, the median OS after re-RT was 9.9 months (95% CI 8.3-11.6). On multivariate analyses, re-resection at progression (HR 0.56, p = 0.027), interval from primary treatment to first progression ≥ 16.3 months (HR 0.61, p = 0.034), interval from primary treatment to re-RT ≥ 23.9 months (HR 0.35, p < 0.001), and re-RT PTV volume < 112 cc (HR 0.27, p < 0.001) were prognostic for improved OS. Patients who had unmethylated-MGMT tumours (OR 12.4, p = 0.034), ≥ 3 prior systemic treatment lines (OR 29.1, p = 0.022), interval to re-RT < 23.9 months (OR 9.0, p = 0.039), and re-RT PTV volume ≥ 112 cc (OR 17.8, p = 0.003) were more likely to die within 6 months of re-RT. The cumulative incidence of RN was 11.4% (95% CI 4.3-18.5) at 12 months. Concurrent bevacizumab use (HR < 0.001, p < 0.001) and cumulative equivalent dose in 2 Gy fractions (EQD2, α/β = 2) < 99 Gy2 (HR < 0.001, p < 0.001) were independent protective factors against RN. Re-RT allowed for less corticosteroid dependency. Sixty-six percent of failures after re-RT were in-field.

CONCLUSION

We observe favorable OS rates following re-RT and identified prognostic factors, including methylation status, that can assist in patient selection and clinical trial design. Concurrent use of bevacizumab mitigated the risk of RN.

A Prospective Study of Conventionally Fractionated Dose Constraints for Reirradiation of Primary Brain Tumors in Adults

PURPOSE

Dose constraints for reirradiation of recurrent primary brain tumors are not well-established. This study was conducted to prospectively evaluate composite dose constraints for conventionally fractionated brain reirradiation.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A single-institution, prospective study of adults with previously irradiated, recurrent brain tumors was performed. For 95% of patients, electronic dosimetry records from the first course of radiation (RT1) were obtained and deformed onto the simulation computed tomography for the second course of radiation (RT2). Conventionally fractionated treatment plans for RT2 were developed that met protocol-assigned dose constraints for RT2 alone and the composite dose of RT1 + RT2. Prospective composite dose constraints were based on histology, interval since RT1, and concurrent bevacizumab. Patients were followed with magnetic resonance imaging including spectroscopy and perfusion studies. Primary endpoint was the rate of symptomatic brain necrosis at 6 months after RT2.

RESULTS

Patients were enrolled from March 2017 to May 2018; 20 were evaluable. Eighteen had glioma, 1 had atypical choroid plexus papilloma, and 1 had hemangiopericytoma. Nineteen patients were treated with volumetric modulated arc therapy, and one was treated with protons. Median RT1 dose was 57 Gy (range, 50-60 Gy). Median RT1-RT2 interval was 49 months (range, 9-141 months). Median RT2 dose was 42.4 Gy (range, 36-60 Gy). Median planning target volume was 186 cc (range, 8-468 cc). Nineteen of 20 patients (95%) were free of grade 3+ central nervous system necrosis. One patient had grade 3+ necrosis 2 months after RT2; the patient recovered fully and lived another 18 months until dying of disease progression. Median overall survival from RT2 start for all patients was 13.3 months (95% credible interval, 6.3-20.7); for patients with glioblastoma, 11.5 months (95% credible interval, 6.1-20.1).

CONCLUSIONS

Brain reirradiation can be safely performed with conventionally fractionated regimens tailored to previous dose distributions. The prospective composite dose constraints described here are a starting point for future studies of conventionally fractionated reirradiation.

Impact of fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy on activity of daily living and performance status in progressive/recurrent glioblastoma: a retrospective study

BACKGROUND

The prognosis of recurrent glioblastoma (GBM) is poor, with limited options of palliative localized or systemic treatments. Survival can be improved by a second localized treatment; however, it is not currently possible to identify which patients would benefit from this approach. This study aims to evaluate which factors lead to a lower Karnofsky performance status (KPS) score after fractionated stereotactic RT (fSRT).

METHODS

We retrospectively collected data from patients treated with fSRT for recurrent GBM at the Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine between October 2010 and November 2017 and analyzed which factors were associated with a lower KPS score.

RESULTS

59 patients received a dose of 25 Gy in 5 sessions spread over 5-7 days (80% isodose). The median time from the end of primary radiotherapy to the initiation of fSRT was 10.7 months. The median follow-up after fSRT initiation was 8.8 months. The incidence of KPS and ADL impairment in all patients were 51.9% and 37.8% respectively with an adverse impact of PTV size on KPS (HR = 1.57 [95% CI 1.19-2.08], p = 0.028). Only two patients showed early grade 3 toxicity and none showed grade 4 or late toxicity. The median overall survival time, median overall survival time after fSRT, median progression-free survival and institutionalization-free survival times were 25.8, 8.8, 3.9 and 7.7 months, respectively. Initial surgery was associated with better progression-free survival (Hazard ratio (HR) = 0.48 [95% CI 0.27-0.86], p = 0.013).

CONCLUSIONS

A larger PTV should predicts lower KPS in the treatment of recurrent GBM using fSRT.

Congress of Neurological Surgeons systematic review and evidence-based guidelines update on the role of radiation therapy in the management of progressive and recurrent glioblastoma in adults

TARGET POPULATION

These recommendations apply to adult patients (18 years of age and above) with progressive/recurrent glioblastoma multiforme (pGBM) after first line combined multimodality treatment.

QUESTION

Can re-irradiation (by using conventional radiotherapy, fractionated radiosurgery, or single fraction radiosurgery) be used in patients with pGBM after the first adjuvant combined multimodality treatment with radiation and chemotherapy?

RECOMMENDATION

Level III: When the target tumor is amenable for additional radiation, re-irradiation is recommended as it provides improved local tumor control, as measured by best imaging response. Such re-irradiation can take the form of conventional fractionation radiotherapy, fractionated radiosurgery, or single fraction radiosurgery.

LEVEL III

Re-Irradiation is recommended in order to maintain or improve a patient's neurological status and quality of life prior to any further tumor progression.

Comparison of carbon ion and photon reirradiation for recurrent glioblastoma

PURPOSE

Purpose of this study was to investigate overall survival in recurrent glioblastoma treated with either carbon ion reirradiation or photon reirradiation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this retrospective study we evaluated 78 consecutive patients with recurrent IDH (Isocitrate dehydrogenase)-wildtype glioblastoma (38 patients carbon ion re-radiotherapy, 40 patients photon re-radiotherapy) treated with either carbon ion reirradiation or stereotactic photon reirradiation. 45 Gy (RBE; 15 fractions) carbon ion reirradiation (CIRT) or 39 Gy (13 fractions) photon reirradiation (FSRT) was administered, respectively. Overall survival was investigated with respect to histological, clinical, and epidemiological features. Kaplan-Meier and multivariate Cox statistics were calculated. A propensity score-matched analysis of the FSRT and CIRT groups using variables from a validated prognosis score was carried out.

RESULTS

The type of reirradiation (CIRT vs. FSRT) significantly influenced overall survival-8.0 months vs. 6.5 months (univariate: p = 0.046)-and remained an independent prognostic factor in multivariate analysis (p = 0.017). Propensity score-adjusted analysis with CIRT versus FSRT as the dependent variable yielded a significant overall survival advantage for the CIRT group (median OS 8.9 versus 7.2 months, p = 0.041, 1‑year survival 29 versus 10%). Adverse events (AE) were evaluated for both subgroups. For the FSRT group no toxicity ≥ grade 4 occurred. For the CIRT subgroup no grade 5 AE occurred, but 1 patient developed a grade 4 radionecrosis. We encountered 4 grade 3 toxicities. One patient developed a zoster at the trunk, 2 progressed in their paresis, and 1 featured progressive dysesthesia.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, carbon ion treatment is a safe and feasible treatment option for recurrent glioblastoma. Due to the retrospective nature of the study and two different dose levels for CIRT or FSRT, the improved outcome in CIRT reirradiation might be an effect of higher biological impact from carbon ions or a simple dose-escalation effect. This hypothesis needs prospective testing in larger patient cohorts. A prospective phase III randomized trial is in preparation at our center.

Efficacy and safety of bevacizumab combined with temozolomide in the treatment of recurrent malignant gliomas and its influence on serum tumor markers

OBJECTIVE

To determine the efficacy and safety of bevacizumab (Bz) combined with temozolomide (TMZ) in the treatment of recurrent malignant gliomas and its influence on serum tumor markers (STMs).

METHODS

The clinical data of 73 patients with recurrent malignant gliomas admitted to the First People's Hospital of Shuangliu District from April 2016 to June 2018 were analyzed retrospectively. Patients were divided into two groups according to different therapies: the control group (n=33) treated with TMZ, and the research group (n=40) treated with Bz combined with TMZ (Bz+TMZ). The overall response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR) and incidence of adverse reactions (ARs) were observed after 4 courses of treatment. The levels of STMs were detected. Additionally, the Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS) score and quality of life (QoL) before and after treatment were compared between the two groups. The 1-year and 2-year survival rates as well as median survival time (MST) were also compared after 2-year follow-up. Treatment satisfaction was recorded and compared.

RESULTS

After treatment, the research group exhibited better ORR and DCR than the control group; The incidence of ARs differed insignificantly between the two arms; The serum levels of Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), epidermal growth factor (EGF) and transforming growth factor β (TGF-β) in the research group were statistically lower than those in the control group; The KPS score and QoL score increased significantly in both arms, and were higher in the research group compared with the control group; the research group was also superior to the control group in treatment satisfaction. The research group showed higher 1-year and 2-year survival rates than the control group.

CONCLUSIONS

BZ+TMZ is effective in treating recurrent malignant gliomas, which can improve the QoL and survival of patients.

A multi-center prospective study of re-irradiation with bevacizumab and temozolomide in patients with bevacizumab refractory recurrent high-grade gliomas

PURPOSE

Survival is dismal for bevacizumab refractory high-grade glioma patients. We prospectively investigated the efficacy of re-irradiation, bevacizumab, and temozolomide in bevacizumab-naïve and bevacizumab-exposed recurrent high-grade glioma, without volume limitations, in a single arm trial.

METHODS

Recurrent high-grade glioma patients were stratified based on WHO grade (4 vs. < 4) and prior exposure to bevacizumab (yes vs. no). Eligible patients received radiation using a simultaneous integrated boost technique (55 Gy to enhancing disease, 45 Gy to non-enhancing disease in 25 fractions) with bevacizumab 10 mg/kg every 2 weeks IV and temozolomide 75 mg/m² daily followed by maintenance bevacizumab 10 mg/kg every 2 weeks and temozolomide 50 mg/m² daily for 6 weeks then a 2 week holiday until progression. Primary endpoint was overall survival. Quality of life was studied using FACT-Br and FACT-fatigue scales.

RESULTS

Fifty-four patients were enrolled. The majority (n = 36, 67%) were bevacizumab pre-exposed GBM. Median OS for all patients was 8.5 months and 7.9 months for the bevacizumab pre-exposed GBM group. Patients ≥ 36 months from initial radiation had a median OS of 13.3 months compared to 7.5 months for those irradiated < 36 months earlier (p < 0.01). FACT-Br and FACT-Fatigue scores initially declined during radiation but returned to pretreatment baseline. Treatment was well tolerated with 5 patients experiencing > grade 3 lymphopenia and 2 with > grade 3 thrombocytopenia. No radiographic or clinical radiation necrosis occurred.

CONCLUSIONS

Re-irradiation with bevacizumab and temozolomide is a safe and feasible salvage treatment for patients with large volume bevacizumab-refractory high-grade glioma. Patients further from their initial radiotherapy may derive greater benefit with this regimen.

Re-irradiation for high-grade gliomas: Has anything changed?

Optimal management after recurrence or progression of high-grade gliomas is still undefined and remains a challenge for neuro-oncology multidisciplinary teams. Improved radiation therapy techniques, new imaging methods, published experience, and a better radiobiological knowledge of brain tissue have positioned re-irradiation (re-RT) as an option for many of these patients. Decisions must be individualized, taking into account the pattern of relapse, previous treatment, and functional status, as well as the patient’s preferences and expected quality of life. Many questions remain unanswered with respect to re-RT: Who is the most appropriate candidate, which dose and fractionation are most effective, how to define the target volume, which imaging technique is best for planning, and what is the optimal timing? This review will focus on describing the most relevant studies that include re-RT as salvage therapy, with the aim of simplifying decision-making and designing the best available therapeutic strategy.

A Phase I clinical trial of dose-escalated metabolic therapy combined with concomitant radiation therapy in high-grade glioma

BACKGROUND

Animal brain-tumor models have demonstrated a synergistic interaction between radiation therapy and a ketogenic diet (KD). Metformin has in-vitro anti-cancer activity, through AMPK activation and mTOR inhibition. We hypothesized that the metabolic stress induced by a KD combined with metformin would enhance radiation's efficacy. We sought to assess the tolerability and feasibility of this approach.

METHODS

A single-institution phase I clinical trial. Radiotherapy was either 60 or 35 Gy over 6 or 2 weeks, for newly diagnosed and recurrent gliomas, respectively. The dietary intervention consisted of a Modified Atkins Diet (ModAD) supplemented with medium chain triglycerides (MCT). There were three cohorts: Dietary intervention alone, and dietary intervention combined with low-dose or high-dose metformin; all patients received radiotherapy. Factors associated with blood ketone levels were investigated using a mixed-model analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 13 patients were accrued, median age 61 years, of whom six had newly diagnosed and seven with recurrent disease. All completed radiation therapy; five patients stopped the metabolic intervention early. Metformin 850 mg three-times daily was poorly tolerated. There were no serious adverse events. Ketone levels were associated with dietary factors (ketogenic ratio, p < 0.001), use of metformin (p = 0. 02) and low insulin levels (p = 0.002). Median progression free survival was ten and four months for newly diagnosed and recurrent disease, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The intervention was well tolerated. Higher serum ketone levels were associated with both dietary intake and metformin use. The recommended phase II dose is eight weeks of a ModAD combined with 850 mg metformin twice daily.

Current status and recent advances in reirradiation of glioblastoma

Despite aggressive management consisting of maximal safe surgical resection followed by external beam radiation therapy (60 Gy/30 fractions) with concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide, approximately 90% of WHO grade IV gliomas (glioblastomas, GBM) will recur locally within 2 years. For patients with recurrent GBM, no standard of care exists. Thanks to the continuous improvement in radiation science and technology, reirradiation has emerged as feasible approach for patients with brain tumors. Using stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) or stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT), either hypofractionated or conventionally fractionated schedules, several studies have suggested survival benefits following reirradiation of patients with recurrent GBM; however, there are still questions to be answered about the efficacy and toxicity associated with a second course of radiation. We provide a clinical overview on current status and recent advances in reirradiation of GBM, addressing relevant clinical questions such as the appropriate patient selection and radiation technique, optimal dose fractionation, reirradiation tolerance of the brain and the risk of radiation necrosis.

Predicting survival in anaplastic astrocytoma patients in a single-center cohort of 108 patients

BACKGROUND

Current guidelines for the treatment of anaplastic astrocytoma (AA) recommend maximal safe resection followed by radiotherapy and chemotherapy. Despite this multimodal treatment approach, patients have a limited life expectancy. In the present study, we identified variables associated with overall survival (OS) and constructed a model score to predict the OS of patients with AA at the time of their primary diagnosis.

METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated 108 patients with newly diagnosed AA. The patient and tumor characteristics were analyzed for their impact on OS. Variables significantly associated with OS on multivariable analysis were included in our score. The final algorithm was based on the 36-month survival rates corresponding to each characteristic.

RESULTS

On univariate analysis, age, Karnofsky performance status, isocitrate dehydrogenase status, and extent of resection were significantly associated with OS. On multivariable analysis all four variables remained significant and were consequently incorporated in the score. The total score ranges from 20 to 33 points. We designated three prognostic groups: A (20-25), B (26-29), and C (30-33 points) with 36-month OS rates of 23%, 71%, and 100%, respectively. The OS rate at 5 years was 8% in group A, 61% in group B and 88% in group C.

CONCLUSIONS

Our model score predicts the OS of patients newly diagnosed with AA and distinguishes patients with a poor survival prognosis from those with a greater life expectancy. Independent and prospective validation is needed. The upcoming changes of the WHO classification of brain tumors as well as the practice changing results from the CATNON trial will most likely require adaption of the score.

Low Fraction Size Re-irradiation for Large Volume Recurrence of Glial Tumours

The aim of the present study was to evaluate the efficacy of re-irradiation (re-RT) in patients with advanced local relapses of glial tumours and to define the factors influencing the result of the hyper-fractionated external beam therapy on progression after primary management. We have analysed the data of 55 patients with brain tumours (GBM: 28) on progression, who were re-irradiated between January 2007 and December 2018. The mean volume of the recurrent tumour was 118 cm³, and the mean planning target volume (PTV) was 316 cm³, to which 32 Gy was delivered in 20 fractions at least 7.7 months after the first radiotherapy, using 3D conformal radiotherapy (CRT) or intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT). The median overall survival (mOS) from the re-RT was 8.4 months, and the 6-month and the 12-month OS rate was 64% and 31%, respectively. The most important factors by univariate analysis, which significantly improved the outcome of re-RT were the longer time interval between the diagnosis and second radiotherapy (p = 0.029), the lower histology grade (p = 0.034), volume of the recurrent tumour (p = 0.006) and Karnofsky performance status (KPS) (p = 0.009) at the re-irradiation. Our low fraction size re-irradiation ≥ 8 months after the first radiotherapy proved to be safe and beneficial for patients with large volume recurrent glial tumours.

A balanced score to predict survival of elderly patients newly diagnosed with glioblastoma

BACKGROUND

Over the past years, several treatment regimens have been recommended for elderly patients with glioblastoma (GBM), ranging from ultrahypofractionated radiotherapy (RT) over monochemotherapy (ChT) to combined radiochemotherapy (RChT). The current guidelines recommend active treatment in elderly patients in cases with a KPS of at least 60%. We established a score for selecting patients with a very poor prognosis from patients with a better prognosis.

METHODS

One hundred eighty one patients ≥65 years old, histologically diagnosed with GBM, were retrospectively evaluated. Clinical characteristics were analysed for their impact on the overall survival (OS). Factors which were significant in univariate analysis (log-rank test, p < 0.05) were included in a multi-variate model (multi-variate Cox regression analysis, MVA). The 9-month OS for the significant factors after MVA (p < 0.05) was included in a prognostic score. Score sums with a median OS of < and > 6 months were summarized as Group A and B, respectively.

RESULTS

Age, KPS, MGMT status, the extent of resection, aphasia after surgery and motor dysfunction after surgery were significantly associated with OS on univariate analysis (p < 0.05). On MVA age (p 0.002), MGMT promotor methylation (p 0.013) and Karnofsky performance status (p 0.005) remained significant and were included in the score. Patients were divided into two groups, group A (median OS of 2.7 months) and group B (median OS of 7.8 months). The score was of prognostic significance, independent of the adjuvant treatment regimen.

CONCLUSIONS

The score distinguishes patients with a poor prognosis from patients with a better prognosis. Its inclusion in future retrospective or prospective trials could help enhance the comparability of results. Before its employment on a routine basis, external validation is recommended.

Italian consensus and recommendations on diagnosis and treatment of low-grade gliomas. An intersociety (SINch/AINO/SIN) document

In 2018, the SINch (Italian Society of Neurosurgery) Neuro-Oncology Section, AINO (Italian Association of Neuro-Oncology) and SIN (Italian Association of Neurology) Neuro-Oncology Section formed a collaborative Task Force to look at the diagnosis and treatment of low-grade gliomas (LGGs). The Task Force included neurologists, neurosurgeons, neuro-oncologists, pathologists, radiologists, radiation oncologists, medical oncologists, a neuropsychologist and a methodologist. For operational purposes, the Task Force was divided into five Working Groups: diagnosis, surgical treatment, adjuvant treatments, supportive therapies, and follow-up. The resulting guidance document is based on the available evidence and provides recommendations on diagnosis and treatment of LGG patients, considering all aspects of patient care along their disease trajectory.

First statement on preparation for the COVID-19 pandemic in large German Speaking University-based radiation oncology departments

The COVID-19 pandemic is challenging modern radiation oncology. At University Hospitals, we have a mandate to offer high-end treatments to all cancer patients. However, in times of crisis we must learn to prioritize resources, especially personnel. Compromising oncological outcome will blur all statistics, therefore all measures must be taken with great caution. Communication with our neighboring countries, within societies and between departments can help meet the challenge. Here, we report on our learning system and preparation measures to effectively tackle the COVID-19 challenge in University-Based Radiation Oncology Departments.

The role of large volume re-irradiation with Bevacizumab in chemorefractory high grade glioma

•

Large volume reRT is a viable treatment for refractory recurrent high-grade glioma.

•

Bevacizumab facilitates large volume reRT by reducing the risk of CNS radionecrosis.

•

Patient selection for reRT needs more work but should be guided by performance status.

Background and purpose

Current practice in re-irradiation (reRT) of previously treated high-grade gliomas (HGG) has generally been limited to small volume reRT with stereotactic procedures. Less evidence exists for large volume reRT involving treatment volumes equivalent to that used at initial diagnosis. The primary aim of this study was to investigate the outcome of large volume reRT delivered in combination with Bevacizumab (BEV) in patients with recurrent chemorefractory HGG.

Methods and materials

Patients with HGG managed with reRT were entered prospectively into a database. Clinicopathological features were recorded including timing of reRT, use of BEV and Dosimetric data. Median survival following reRT was the primary endpoint and association with clinicopathological factors was assessed with cox regression models.

Results

Sixty seven patients in total were managed with reRT, 51 patients had glioblastoma and 16 had anaplastic glioma. The median PTV was 145.3 cm³. Median OS post reRT was 7.8 months (95% CI 6.3–9.2 months) in the total cohort and 7.5 months (95% CI: 6.6–8.3 months) for GBM patients. In multivariate analysis of the whole cohort, IDH1 mutation status (p = 0.041) and ECOG status prior to reRT (<0.001) were significantly associated with OS. In terms of safety and toxicity, the majority of patients (66.5%) were ECOG 0–2 three months after treatment. In total, four episodes of suspected radiation necrosis occurred, all in patients treated without upfront BEV.

Conclusion

Large volume reRT with bevacizumab is a feasible late salvage option in patients with recurrent HGG and offers meaningful prolongation of survival with low toxicity.

Digital biomarkers: Importance of patient stratification for re-irradiation of glioma patients - Review of latest developments regarding scoring assessment

PURPOSE

To review scoring assessments in re-irradiation of high-grade glioma (HGG) patients and how to use scoring for patient stratification. The next aim was to investigate the different approaches employed by the scoring systems and the way they can be applied to build homogeneous patient groups for a reliable prognosis.

METHODS

We searched the Medline/Pubmed and Web of science databases for relevant articles regarding scores for re-irradiation of recurrent HGG. All references were divided into the following groups: novel score establishment (n = 5), score validation (n = 6), not relevant to this evaluation (n = 26).

RESULTS

We identified five scoring systems. Two are modifications of an already existing score. Calculations differ immensely from easy point addition to a more complex formula with including three up to 10 individual parameters. Six validation articles were found for three of the scores; one was validated four times. Two scores were never validated.

CONCLUSION

For recurrent HGG, the clinical situation remains demanding. Due to the heterogeneity of data at re-irradiation, patient stratification is important. Several scoring systems have been developed to predict prognosis. As a digital biomarker, scores are of high value regarding quick patient assessment and therapy decision making. For the next generation of digital biomarkers, easy calculation, and inclusion of easily available parameters are crucial.

A Second Course of Radiotherapy in Patients with Recurrent Malignant Gliomas: Clinical Data on Re-irradiation, Prognostic Factors, and Usefulness of Digital Biomarkers

OPINION STATEMENT

The treatment of malignant gliomas has undergone a significant intensification during the past decade, and the interdisciplinary treatment team has learned that all treatment opportunities, including surgery and radiotherapy (RT), also have a central role in recurrent gliomas. Throughout the decades, re-irradiation (re-RT) has achieved a prominent place in the treatment of recurrent gliomas. A solid body of evidence supports the safety and efficacy of re-RT, especially when modern techniques are used, and justifies the early use of this regimen, especially in the case when macroscopic disease is present. Additionally, a second adjuvant re-RT to the resection cavity is currently being investigated by several investigators and seems to offer promising results. Although advanced RT technologies, such as stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (FSRT), intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT), and image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT) have become available in many centers, re-RT should continue to be kept in experienced hands so that they can select the optimal regimen, the ideal treatment volume, and the appropriate techniques from their tool-boxes. Concomitant or adjuvant use of systemic treatment options should also strongly be taken into consideration, especially because temozolomide (TMZ), cyclohexyl-nitroso-urea (CCNU), and bevacizumab have shown a good safety profile; they should be considered, if available. Nonetheless, the selection of patients for re-RT remains crucial. Single factors, such as patient age or the progression-free interval (PFI), fall too short. Therefore, powerful prognostic scores have been generated and validated, and these scores should be used for patient selection and counseling.

Reirradiation of recurrent high-grade glioma and development of prognostic scores for progression and survival

Background

Optimal techniques and patient selection for salvage reirradiation of high-grade glioma (HGG) are unclear. In this study, we identify prognostic factors for freedom from progression (FFP) and overall survival (OS) after reirradiation, risk factors for high-grade toxicity, and validate clinical prognostic scores.

Methods

A total of 116 patients evaluated between 2000 and 2018 received reirradiation for HGG (99 WHO grade IV, 17 WHO grade III). Median time to first progression after initial therapy was 10.6 months. Salvage therapies before reirradiation included surgery (31%) and systemic therapy (41%). Sixty-five patients (56%) received single-fraction stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) as reirradiation. The median biologically effective dose (BED) was 47.25 Gy, and the median planning target volume (PTV) was 4.8 cc for SRS and 95.0 cc for non-SRS treatments. Systemic therapy was given concurrently to 52% and adjuvantly to 74% of patients.

Results

Median FFP was 4.9 months, and median OS was 11.0 months. Significant multivariable prognostic factors for FFP were performance status, time to initial progression, and BED; for OS they were age, time to initial progression, and PTV volume at recurrence. High-grade toxicity was correlated to PTV size at recurrence. Three-level prognostic scores were generated for FFP and OS, with cross-validated receiver operating characteristic area under the curve (AUC) of 0.640 and 0.687, respectively.

Conclusions

Clinical variables at the time of reirradiation for HGG can be used to prognosticate FFP and OS.

Appraisal of re-irradiation for the recurrent glioblastoma in the era of MGMT promotor methylation

Despite recent innovation in treatment techniques and subsequently improved outcomes, the majority of glioblastoma (GBL) have relapses, especially in locoregional areas. Local re-irradiation (re-RT) has been established as a feasible option for recurrent GBL of all ages with safety, tolerability, and effectiveness both in survival and quality of life regardless of fractionation schedule. To keep adverse effects under acceptable range, cumulative dose limit in equivalent dose at 2 Gy fractions by the linear-quadratic model at α/β = 2 for normal brain tissue (EQD2) with narrow margin should be observed and single/hypofractionated re-RT should be undertaken very carefully to recurrent tumor with large volume or adjacent to the brainstem. Promising outcome of re-operation (re-Op) plus re-RT (re-Op/RT) need to be validated and result from re-RT with temozolomide/bevacizumab (TMZ/BV) or new strategy is expected. Development of new-concept prognostic scoring or risk group is required to select patients properly and make use of predictive biomarkers such as O(6)-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) promotor methylation that influence outcomes of re-RT, re-Op/RT, or re-RT with TMZ/BV.

Re-irradiation in elderly patients with glioblastoma: a single institution experience

BACKGROUND

Re-Irradiation (Re-RT) is an established treatment option for young patients with recurrent glioblastoma (GBM). Multiple reports show a low risk of side-effects as well as a good efficacy resulting in median survival times ranging from 5 to 18 months. Elderly patients, however, are underrepresented in reports about Re-RT. Even in the elderly, with concomitant radiochemotherapy and adjuvant chemotherapy, progression-free survival times now are approaching 6 months or even longer.

METHODS

We report on 25 consecutive patients with at least 65 years of age treated with Re-RT for recurrent GBM. We analyzed the patient's files for the treatment regimens, side-effects and survival times. Survival times, as well as hazards, were calculated by the Kaplan Meier method as well as Cox-regression method, respectively.

RESULTS

The median overall survival was 6.9 months, treatment was well tolerated with only minor side effects. Use of systemic treatments as well as the length of the interval between 1st -line radiotherapy and re-irradiation were associated with a favorable prognosis. The latter remained significant after multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSION

Re-RT of elderly GBM patients should not be withheld based purely on age since the treatment is safe and results in comparable survival times to younger patients. When counseling elderly patients with recurrent GBM, especially the length of the interval since 1st line radiotherapy should be considered as a prognostic factor and an additional systemic treatment option should be considered.

Re-irradiation for recurrent glioma: outcome evaluation, toxicity and prognostic factors assessment. A multicenter study of the Radiation Oncology Italian Association (AIRO)

INTRODUCTION

The prognosis of glioma is dismal, and almost all patients relapsed. At recurrence time, several treatment options are considered, but to date there is no a standard of care. The Neurooncology Study Group of the Italian Association of Radiation Oncology (AIRO) collected clinical data regarding a large series of recurrent glioma patients who underwent re-irradiation (re-RT) in Italy.

METHODS

Data regarding 300 recurrent glioma patients treated from May 2002 to November 2017, were analyzed. All patients underwent re-RT. Surgical resection, followed by re-RT with concomitant and adjuvant chemotherapy was performed. Clinical outcome was evaluated by neurological examination and brain MRI performed, 1 month after radiation therapy and then every 3 months.

RESULTS

Re-irradiation was performed at a median interval time (IT) of 16 months from the first RT. Surgical resection before re-RT was performed in 19% of patients, concomitant temozolomide (TMZ) in 16.3%, and maintenance chemotherapy in 29%. Total doses ranged from 9 Gy to 52.5 Gy, with a median biological effective dose of 43 Gy. The median, 1, 2 year OS were 9.7 months, 41% and 17.7%. Low grade glioma histology (p  ≪ 0.01), IT > 12 months (p = 0.001), KPS > 70 (p = 0.004), younger age (p = 0.001), high total doses delivered (p = 0.04), and combined treatment performed (p = 0.0008) were recorded as conditioning survival.

CONCLUSION

our data underline re-RT as a safe and feasible treatment with limited rate of toxicity, and a combined ones as a better option for selected patients. The identification of a BED threshold able to obtain a greater benefit on OS, can help in designing future prospective studies.

Patterns of re-irradiation for recurrent gliomas and validation of a prognostic score

PURPOSE OR OBJECTIVE

Re-irradiation is a generally accepted method for salvage treatment in patients with recurrent glioma. However, no standard radiation regimen has been defined. This study aims to compare the efficacy and safety of different treatment regimens and to independently externally validate a recently published reirradiation risk score.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed a cohort of patients with recurrent malignant glioma treated with salvage conventionally fractionated (CFRT), hypofractionated (HFRT) or stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) between 2007 and 2017 at the University Medical Centers in Utrecht and Groningen.

RESULTS

Of the 121 patients included, 60 patients (50%) underwent CFRT, 22 (18%) HFRT and 39 (32%) SRT. The primary tumor was grade II-III in 52 patients and grade IV in 69 patients with median Overall Survival (mOS) since first surgery of 113 [Interquartile range: 53.2-137] and 39.7 [24.6-64.9] months respectively (p < 0.01). Overall, mOS from the first day of re-irradiation was 9.7 months [6.5-14.6]. No significant difference in mOS was found between the treatment groups. In multivariate analysis, the Karnofsky performance scale ≥70% (p < 0.01), re-irradiation for first recurrence (p = 0.02), longer time interval between RT start dates (p < 0.01) and smaller planning target volume (p < 0.05) were significant favorable prognostic factors. The reirradiation risk score was validated.

CONCLUSION

In our series, mOS after reirradiation was sufficient to justify use of this modality. Until a reliable treatment decision tool is developed based on larger retrospective research, the decision for re-irradiation schedule should remain personalized and based on a multidisciplinary evaluation of each patient.

Re-irradiation of recurrent glioblastoma as part of a sequential multimodality treatment concept

PURPOSE

The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate survival outcomes in well-performing, mainly, young patients receiving a sequence of all available therapeutic options for relapsed glioblastoma, including re-irradiation.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis of 27 patients irradiated twice for glioblastoma between 2008 and 2016. In the first line, all had surgical treatment of the tumor followed by radiotherapy with a total dose of 60 Gy and temozolomide. All re-irradiated patients were treated with a total dose of 36 Gy in 12 fractions. The endpoints were death from glioblastoma or any cause, and toxicity after re-irradiation.

RESULTS

The median follow-up of survivors was 35.6 months. At the time of analysis, 25 patients had died. The median time between first and second radiotherapy was 18.9 months (6.1-58.4). Re-irradiation was performed at different time points of first, second and third progression. The median overall survival after first diagnosis was 39.2 months. Five years after first surgery, nearly 20% of the patients were alive.

CONCLUSION

Carefully planned re-irradiation of the brain is a safe therapy for recurrent glioblastoma. Younger and well-performing patients benefit from all available therapy options. Every patient should be discussed in a multidisciplinary setting at each time point of tumor progression. Further prospective studies are needed to define the optimal time, dose and volume of re-irradiation.

Re-irradiation for malignant glioma: Toward patient selection and defining treatment parameters for salvage

Purpose

Reirradiation for recurrent glioma remains controversial without knowledge of optimal patient selection, dose, fractionation, and normal tissue tolerances. We retrospectively evaluated outcomes and toxicity after conventionally fractionated reirradiation for recurrent high-grade glioma, along with the impact of concurrent chemotherapy.

Methods and materials

We conducted a retrospective review of patients reirradiated for high-grade glioma recurrence between 2007 and 2016 (including patients with initial low-grade glioma). Outcome metrics included overall survival (OS), prognostic factors for survival, and treatment-related toxicity.

Results

Patients (n = 118; median age 47 years; median Karnofsky performance status score: 80) were re-treated at a median of 28 months (range, 5-214 months) after initial radiation therapy. The median reirradiation dose was 41.4 Gy (range, 12.6-54.0 Gy) to a median lesion volume of 202 cm³ (range, 20-901 cm³). The median cumulative (initial radiation and reirradiation combined) potential maximum brainstem dose was 76.9 Gy (range, 5.0-108.3 Gy) and optic apparatus dose was 56.0 Gy (range, 4.5-90.9 Gy). Of the patients, 56% received concurrent temozolomide, 14%, bevacizumab, and 11%, temozolomide plus bevacizumab; 19% had no chemotherapy. The planned reirradiation was completed by 90% of patients. Median OS from the completion of reirradiation was 9.6 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 7.5-11.7 months) for all patients and 14.0, 11.5, and 6.7 months for patients with initial grade 2, 3, and 4 glioma, respectively. On multivariate analysis, better OS was observed with a >24-month interval between radiation treatments (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.3; 95% CI, 0.2-0.5; P < .001), reirradiation dose >41.4 Gy (HR: 0.6; 95% CI, 0.4-0.9; P = .03), and gross total resection before reirradiation (HR: 0.6, 95% CI, 0.3-0.9; P = .02). Radiation necrosis and grade ≥3 late neurotoxicity were both minimal (<5%). No symptomatic persistent brainstem or optic nerve/chiasm injury was identified.

Conclusions

Salvage reirradiation, even at doses >41.4 Gy in conventional fractionation, along with chemotherapy, was safe and well tolerated with meaningful survival duration. These data provide information that may be useful in implementing safe reirradiation treatments for appropriately selected patients and guiding future studies to define optimal reirradiation doses, maximal safe doses to critical structures, and the role of systemic therapy.

Survival gain with re-Op/RT for recurred high-grade gliomas depends upon risk groups

INTRODUCTION

A majority of high-grade gliomas relapse despite combined surgery, radiotherapy and chemotherapy. There is no consensus on standard treatment for recurrent high-grade gliomas, or defined efficacy of adjuvant re-RT after re-Op. This retrospective study evaluated the benefit and safety of re-RT after re-Op (re-Op/RT).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 84 patients with recurrent high-grade gliomas who underwent reoperation from 2009 to 2015 were analyzed. All patients received neurosurgical intervention and adjuvant radiotherapy previously before recurrence. At recurrence and after reoperation, treatment options were discussed in multidisciplinary clinic or brain tumor joint conference. For re-RT, cumulative EQD₂ (equivalent dose in 2 Gy fractions at α/β = 2) was below 106.9 Gy.

RESULT

Median progression free survival (PFS) was 6.5 months; 3.5 months with re-Op, 9.0 months with re-Op/RT (p = 0.025). Age <50, time interval to recur ≥12 months, WHO pathologic grade III, methylated MGMT promotor, and re-RT were factors enhancing PFS in the multivariate analysis. Median overall survival (OS) was 18.3 months: 12.7 months with re-Op, and 28.1 months with re-Op/RT (p = 0.066). Three risk factors (age >50, WHO grade IV, and unmethylated promoter of MGMT) were significantly associated with poor OS in multivariate analysis. Benefit of re-RT in both OS and PFS was established in patients carrying 2 or more risk factors. During re-RT, 4 patients (8%) had grade 2 or higher toxicity, and 3 patients (6%) did not complete re-RT. No radionecrosis was observed.

CONCLUSION

Re-RT after re-Op was tolerable with a cumulative median EQD₂ of 99.3 Gy and resulted in clear benefit in PFS and marginal gain in OS. Survival gain with re-Op/RT was more prominent in patients with two or more risk factors (age ≥50, WHO pathologic grade IV, unmethylated MGMT promoter), and needs to be validated.

Re-irradiation of recurrent gliomas: pooled analysis and validation of an established prognostic score-report of the Radiation Oncology Group (ROG) of the German Cancer Consortium (DKTK)

The heterogeneity of high‐grade glioma recurrences remains an ongoing challenge for the interdisciplinary neurooncology team. Response to re‐irradiation (re‐RT) is heterogeneous, and survival data depend on prognostic factors such as tumor volume, primary histology, age, the possibility of reresection, or time between primary diagnosis and initial RT and re‐RT. In the present pooled analysis, we gathered data from radiooncology centers of the DKTK Consortium and used it to validate the established prognostic score by Combs et al. and its modification by Kessel et al. Data consisted of a large independent, multicenter cohort of 565 high‐grade glioma patients treated with re‐RT from 1997 to 2016 and a median dose of 36 Gy. Primary RT was between 1986 and 2015 with a median dose of 60 Gy. Median age was 54 years; median follow‐up was 7.1 months. Median OS after re‐RT was 7.5, 9.5, and 13.8 months for WHO IV, III, and I/II gliomas, respectively. All six prognostic factors were tested for their significance on OS. Aside from the time from primary RT to re‐RT (P = 0.074) and the reresection status (P = 0.101), all factors (primary histology, age, KPS, and tumor volume) were significant. Both the original and new score showed a highly significant influence on survival with P < 0.001. Both prognostic scores successfully predict survival after re‐RT and can easily be applied in the routine clinical workflow. Now, further prognostic features need to be found to even improve treatment decisions regarding neurooncological interventions for recurrent glioma patients.

Independent validation of a new reirradiation risk score (RRRS) for glioma patients predicting post-recurrence survival: A multicenter DKTK/ROG analysis

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Reirradiation (reRT) is a valid option with considerable efficacy in patients with recurrent high-grade glioma, but it is still not known which patients might be optimal candidates for a second course of irradiation. This study validated a newly developed prognostic score independently in an external patient cohort.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The reRT risk score (RRRS) is based on a linear combination of initial histology, clinical performance status, and age derived from a multivariable model of 353 patients. This score can predict post-recurrence survival (PRS) after reRT. The validation dataset consisted of 212 patients.

RESULTS

The RRRS differentiates three prognostic groups. Discrimination and calibration were maintained in the validation group. Median PRS times in the development cohort for the good/intermediate/poor risk categories were 14.2, 9.1, and 5.3 months, respectively. The respective groups within the validation cohort displayed median PRS times of 13.8, 8.8, and 3.8 months, respectively. Uno's C for development data was 0.64 (CI: 0.60-0.69) and for validation data 0.63 (CI: 0.58-0.68).

CONCLUSIONS

The RRRS has been successfully validated in an independent patient cohort. This linear combination of three easily determined clinicopathological factors allows for a reliable classification of patients and may be used as stratification factor for future trials.