Knowledge-based prediction of protein backbone conformation using a structural alphabet

Machine learning-based prediction of proteins' architecture using sequences of amino acids and structural alphabets

In addition to the growth of protein structures generated through wet laboratory experiments and deposited in the PDB repository, AlphaFold predictions have significantly contributed to the creation of a much larger database of protein structures. Annotating such a vast number of structures has become an increasingly challenging task. CATH is widely recognized as one the most common platforms for addressing this challenge, as it classifies proteins based on their structural and evolutionary relationships, offering the scientific community an invaluable resource for uncovering various properties, including functional annotations. While CATH annotation involves - to some extent - human intervention, keeping up with the classification of the rapidly expanding repositories of protein structures has become exceedingly difficult. Therefore, there is a pressing need for a fully automated approach. On the other hand, the abundance of protein sequences stemming from next generation sequencing technologies, lacking structural annotations, presents an additional challenge to the scientific community. Consequently, 'pre-annotating' protein sequences with structural features, ensuring a high level of precision, could prove highly advantageous. In this paper, after a thorough investigation, we introduce a novel machine-learning model capable of classifying any protein domain, whether it has a known structure or not, into one of the 40 main CATH Architectures. We achieve an F1 Score of 0.92 using only the amino acid sequence and a score of 0.94 using both the sequence of amino acids and the sequence of structural alphabets.Communicated by Ramaswamy H. Sarma.

Prediction of structural alphabet protein blocks using data mining

3D protein structures determine proteins' biological functions. The 3D structure of the protein backbone can be approximated using the prototypes of local protein conformations. Sets of these prototypes are called structural alphabets (SAs). Amongst several approaches to the prediction of 3D structures from amino acid sequences, one approach is based on the prediction of SA prototypes for a given amino acid sequence. Protein Blocks (PBs) is the most known SA, and it is composed of 16 prototypes of five consecutive amino acids which were identified as optimal prototypes considering the ability to correctly approximate the local structure and the prediction accuracy of prototypes from an amino acid sequence. We developed models for PBs prediction from sequence information using different data mining approaches and machine learning algorithms. Besides the amino acid sequences, the results of the following tools were used to train the models: the Spider3 predictor of protein structure properties, several predictors of the protein's intrinsically disordered regions, and a tool for finding repeats in amino acid sequences. The highest accuracy of the constructed models is 80%, which is a significant improvement compared to the previous best available prediction, whose accuracy was 61%. Analyzing the models constructed by applying different algorithms, it was noticed that the significance of input attributes differs among the models constructed by algorithms. Using the information about amino acids belonging to intrinsically disordered regions and repeats improves the precision of prediction for some PBs using the CART classification algorithm, while this is not the case with the C5.0 classification algorithm. Improved prediction approaches can have interesting applications in protein structural model approaches or computational protein design.

PYTHIA: Deep Learning Approach for Local Protein Conformation Prediction

Protein Blocks (PBs) are a widely used structural alphabet describing local protein backbone conformation in terms of 16 possible conformational states, adopted by five consecutive amino acids. The representation of complex protein 3D structures as 1D PB sequences was previously successfully applied to protein structure alignment and protein structure prediction. In the current study, we present a new model, PYTHIA (predicting any conformation at high accuracy), for the prediction of the protein local conformations in terms of PBs directly from the amino acid sequence. PYTHIA is based on a deep residual inception-inside-inception neural network with convolutional block attention modules, predicting 1 of 16 PB classes from evolutionary information combined to physicochemical properties of individual amino acids. PYTHIA clearly outperforms the LOCUSTRA reference method for all PB classes and demonstrates great performance for PB prediction on particularly challenging proteins from the CASP14 free modelling category.

PDB-2-PBv3.0: An updated protein block database

Our protein block (PB) sequence database PDB-2-PBv1.0 provides PB sequences and dihedral angles for 74,297 protein structures comprising of 103,252 protein chains of Protein Data Bank (PDB) as on 2011. Since there are a lot of practical applications of PB and also as the size of PDB database increases, it becomes necessary to provide the PB sequences for all PDB protein structures. The current updated PDB-2-PBv3.0 contains PB sequences for 147,602 PDB structures comprising of 400,355 protein chains as on October 2019. When compared to our previous version PDB-2-PBv1.0, the current PDB-2-PBv3.0 contains 2- and 4-fold increase in the number of protein structures and chains, respectively. Notably, it provides PB information for any protein chain, regardless of the missing atom records of protein structure data in PDB. It includes protein interaction information with DNA and RNA along with their corresponding functional classes from Nucleic Acid Database (NDB) and PDB. Now, the updated version allows the user to download multiple PB records by parameter search and/or by a given list. This database is freely accessible at http://bioinfo.bdu.ac.in/pb3.

Structural coordinates: A novel approach to predict protein backbone conformation

Motivation

Local protein structure is usually described via classifying each peptide to a unique class from a set of pre-defined structures. These classifications may differ in the number of structural classes, the length of peptides, or class attribution criteria. Most methods that predict the local structure of a protein from its sequence first rely on some classification and only then proceed to the 3D conformation assessment. However, most classification methods rely on homologous proteins’ existence, unavoidably lose information by attributing a peptide to a single class or suffer from a suboptimal choice of the representative classes.

Results

To alleviate the above challenges, we propose a method that constructs a peptide’s structural representation from the sequence, reflecting its similarity to several basic representative structures. For 5-mer peptides and 16 representative structures, we achieved the Q16 classification accuracy of 67.9%, which is higher than what is currently reported in the literature. Our prediction method does not utilize information about protein homologues but relies only on the amino acids’ physicochemical properties and the resolved structures’ statistics. We also show that the 3D coordinates of a peptide can be uniquely recovered from its structural coordinates, and show the required conditions under various geometric constraints.

Development of a TSR-Based Method for Protein 3-D Structural Comparison With Its Applications to Protein Classification and Motif Discovery

Development of protein 3-D structural comparison methods is important in understanding protein functions. At the same time, developing such a method is very challenging. In the last 40 years, ever since the development of the first automated structural method, ~200 papers were published using different representations of structures. The existing methods can be divided into five categories: sequence-, distance-, secondary structure-, geometry-based, and network-based structural comparisons. Each has its uniqueness, but also limitations. We have developed a novel method where the 3-D structure of a protein is modeled using the concept of Triangular Spatial Relationship (TSR), where triangles are constructed with the C_α atoms of a protein as vertices. Every triangle is represented using an integer, which we denote as “key,” A key is computed using the length, angle, and vertex labels based on a rule-based formula, which ensures assignment of the same key to identical TSRs across proteins. A structure is thereby represented by a vector of integers. Our method is able to accurately quantify similarity of structure or substructure by matching numbers of identical keys between two proteins. The uniqueness of our method includes: (i) a unique way to represent structures to avoid performing structural superimposition; (ii) use of triangles to represent substructures as it is the simplest primitive to capture shape; (iii) complex structure comparison is achieved by matching integers corresponding to multiple TSRs. Every substructure of one protein is compared to every other substructure in a different protein. The method is used in the studies of proteases and kinases because they play essential roles in cell signaling, and a majority of these constitute drug targets. The new motifs or substructures we identified specifically for proteases and kinases provide a deeper insight into their structural relations. Furthermore, the method provides a unique way to study protein conformational changes. In addition, the results from CATH and SCOP data sets clearly demonstrate that our method can distinguish alpha helices from beta pleated sheets and vice versa. Our method has the potential to be developed into a powerful tool for efficient structure-BLAST search and comparison, just as BLAST is for sequence search and alignment.

Marine-Derived Secondary Metabolites as Promising Epigenetic Bio-Compounds for Anticancer Therapy

Sessile organisms such as seaweeds, corals, and sponges continuously adapt to both abiotic and biotic components of the ecosystem. This extremely complex and dynamic process often results in different forms of competition to ensure the maintenance of an ecological niche suitable for survival. A high percentage of marine species have evolved to synthesize biologically active molecules, termed secondary metabolites, as a defense mechanism against the external environment. These natural products and their derivatives may play modulatory roles in the epigenome and in disease-associated epigenetic machinery. Epigenetic modifications also represent a form of adaptation to the environment and confer a competitive advantage to marine species by mediating the production of complex chemical molecules with potential clinical implications. Bioactive compounds are able to interfere with epigenetic targets by regulating key transcriptional factors involved in the hallmarks of cancer through orchestrated molecular mechanisms, which also establish signaling interactions of the tumor microenvironment crucial to cancer phenotypes. In this review, we discuss the current understanding of secondary metabolites derived from marine organisms and their synthetic derivatives as epigenetic modulators, highlighting advantages and limitations, as well as potential strategies to improve cancer treatment.

Structural variations within proteins can be as large as variations observed across their homologues

Understanding the structural plasticity of proteins is key to understanding the intricacies of their functions and mechanistic basis. In the current study, we analyzed the available multiple crystal structures of the same protein for the structural differences. For this purpose we used an abstraction of protein structures referred as Protein Blocks (PBs) that was previously established. We also characterized the nature of the structural variations for a few proteins using molecular dynamics simulations. In both the cases, the structural variations were summarized in the form of substitution matrices of PBs. We show that certain conformational states are preferably replaced by other specific conformational states. Interestingly, these structural variations are highly similar to those previously observed across structures of homologous proteins (r² = 0.923) or across the ensemble of conformations from NMR data (r² = 0.919). Thus our study quantitatively shows that overall trends of structural changes in a given protein are nearly identical to the trends of structural differences that occur in the topologically equivalent positions in homologous proteins. Specific case studies are used to illustrate the nature of these structural variations.

Discrete analyses of protein dynamics

Protein structures are highly dynamic macromolecules. This dynamics is often analysed through experimental and/or computational methods only for an isolated or a limited number of proteins. Here, we explore large-scale protein dynamics simulation to observe dynamics of local protein conformations using different perspectives. We analysed molecular dynamics to investigate protein flexibility locally, using classical approaches such as RMSf, solvent accessibility, but also innovative approaches such as local entropy. First, we focussed on classical secondary structures and analysed specifically how β-strand, β-turns, and bends evolve during molecular simulations. We underlined interesting specific bias between β-turns and bends, which are considered as the same category, while their dynamics show differences. Second, we used a structural alphabet that is able to approximate every part of the protein structures conformations, namely protein blocks (PBs) to analyse (i) how each initial local protein conformations evolve during dynamics and (ii) if some exchange can exist among these PBs. Interestingly, the results are largely complex than simple regular/rigid and coil/flexible exchange. AbbreviationsN_eqnumber of equivalentPBProtein BlocksPDBProtein DataBankRMSfroot mean square fluctuationsCommunicated by Ramaswamy H. Sarma.