Neoadjuvant chemotherapy versus primary debulking surgery in advanced epithelial ovarian cancer: A meta-analysis of peri-operative outcome

Diagnostic accuracy of tru-cut biopsy and acid cytology from patients operated with suspicious for ovarian cancer*

OBJECTIVE

In women who are believed to have ovarian cancer but have a poor performance status or have advanced disease thought to be beyond the scope of primary cytoreductive surgery, neoadjuvant chemotherapy can be administered with acid cytology and/or tru-cut biopsy referral. The aim of this study was to determine the accuracy, adequacy, safety, and reliability of these minimally invasive interventional procedures.

METHODS

This is a retrospective analysis of 63 patients with a suspicion of ovarian cancer who reported to Bezmialem University Hospital between 2014 and 2021, underwent ultrasound-guided acid cytology and tru-cut biopsy, and also had postoperative final pathology results.

RESULTS

On comparing acid cytology and tru-cut biopsy at the same time with the postoperative final pathology results, it was seen that the positive predictive value was 100% in all groups. It was revealed that the sensitivity of acid cytology was 64%, the specificity was 100%, the negative predictive value was 12%, and the accuracy of the test was 65%. The sensitivity of the tru-cut biopsy was 91%, the specificity was 100%, the negative predictive value was 42%, and the accuracy of the test was 92%. In the case of both procedures, the sensitivity was calculated as 93% and the accuracy of the test was calculated as 93%. There were no false-positive cytology and biopsy results.

CONCLUSION

Due to its high reliability and accuracy, the combined application of these minimally invasive methods has the potential to routinely replace more invasive methods for adequate tumor sampling, such as diagnostic laparoscopy or exploratory laparotomy.

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy before surgery versus surgery followed by chemotherapy for initial treatment in advanced epithelial ovarian cancer

RATIONALE

Epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) presents at an advanced stage in the majority of women. These women require a combination of surgery and chemotherapy for optimal treatment. Conventional treatment has been to perform surgery first and then give chemotherapy. However, there may be advantages to using chemotherapy before surgery.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the advantages and disadvantages of treating women with advanced EOC with chemotherapy before cytoreductive surgery (neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT)) compared with conventional treatment where chemotherapy follows cytoreductive surgery (primary cytoreductive surgery (PCRS)).

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, Embase, ClinicalTrials.gov, and the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform on 21 March 2024. We also checked the reference lists of relevant papers for further studies. We contacted the principal investigators of relevant trials for further information.

ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of women with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer (International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage III/IV) who were randomly allocated to treatment groups that compared platinum-based chemotherapy before cytoreductive surgery with platinum-based chemotherapy following cytoreductive surgery.

OUTCOMES

We extracted data on overall (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS), adverse events, surgically related mortality and morbidity, and quality of life outcomes.

RISK OF BIAS

We used the Cochrane RoB 1 tool to assess risk of bias in RCTs.

SYNTHESIS METHODS

We conducted meta-analyses using random-effects models (due to heterogeneity between studies) to calculate hazard ratios (HR), risk ratios (RR), mean differences (MD), and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for all outcomes. We assessed the certainty of evidence according to the GRADE approach.

INCLUDED STUDIES

We identified a further 1022 titles and abstracts through our searches in this update (958 unique records after further de-duplication), adding to the 2227 titles and abstracts identified in previous versions of this review. A total of five RCTs of varying quality and size met the inclusion criteria. We identified no new completed studies in this update, but we did include additional data from existing studies. The studies assessed a total of 1774 women with stage III/IV ovarian cancer randomised to NACT followed by interval cytoreductive surgery (ICRS) or PCRS followed by chemotherapy. We included data from four studies in the meta-analyses (1692 participants).

SYNTHESIS OF RESULTS

Survival We found little or no difference between groups in OS (HR 0.96, 95% CI 0.86 to 1.08; P = 0.49; I2 = 0%; 4 studies; 1692 women; high-certainty evidence) and likely little or no difference between groups in PFS (HR 0.98, 95% CI 0.88 to 1.08; P = 0.62; I2 = 0%; 4 studies; 1692 women; moderate-certainty evidence). Adverse events Adverse events, surgical morbidity, and quality of life outcomes were variably and incompletely reported across studies. NACT reduces postoperative mortality (0.4% in the NACT group versus 3.3% in the PCRS group) (RR 0.18, 95% CI 0.06 to 0.52; P = 0.002; I2 = 0%; 4 studies; 1542 women; high-certainty evidence). There are probably clinically meaningful differences in favour of NACT compared to PCRS in overall surgically related adverse effects (grade 3+ (G3+)) (6% in the NACT group versus 29% in the PCRS group) (RR 0.22, 95% CI 0.13 to 0.38; P < 0.001; I2 = 0%; 2 studies; 435 women; moderate-certainty evidence). Organ resection NACT probably results in a large reduction in the need for stoma formation (5.8% in the NACT group versus 20.4% in the PCRS group) (RR 0.29, 95% CI 0.12 to 0.74; P = 0.009; I2 = 70%; 2 studies; 632 women; moderate-certainty evidence) and probably reduces the risk of needing bowel resection at the time of surgery (13.0% in the NACT group versus 26.6% in the PCRS group) (RR 0.47, 95% CI 0.27 to 0.81; P = 0.007; I2 = 84%; 4 studies; 1578 women; moderate-certainty evidence). Quality of life Global quality of life on the EORTC QLQ-C30 produced imprecise results in three studies, with high levels of heterogeneity (quality of life at six months: MD 6.62, 95% CI -2.89 to 16.13; P = 0.17; I2 = 92%; 3 studies; 559 women; low-certainty evidence). Overall, functional and symptom scores may be slightly improved for NACT at 6 months, but similar by 12 months, although the differences might not be clinically meaningful.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

The available high- to moderate-certainty evidence shows there is likely little or no difference in primary survival outcomes between PCRS and NACT for those with advanced EOC who are suitable for either treatment option. NACT reduces the risk of postoperative mortality and likely reduces the risk of serious adverse events, especially those around the time of surgery, and the need for stoma formation. These data should inform women and clinicians (involving specialist gynaecological multidisciplinary teams) and allow treatment to be tailored to the individual patient, taking into account surgical resectability, age, histology, stage, and performance status. Data from an unpublished study and ongoing studies are awaited.

FUNDING

This Cochrane review update had no dedicated funding.

REGISTRATION

Protocol (2005): DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD005343 Original review (2007): DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD005343.pub2 Review update (2012): DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD005343.pub3 Review update (2019): DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD005343.pub4 Review update (2021): DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD005343.pub5 Review updated (2021a): DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD005343.pub6.

The Cukurova score in the prediction of primary cytoreduction in ovarian cancer

OBJECTIVE

Primary debulking surgery has been the preferred surgical route and is still considered a quality indicator for advanced ovarian cancer surgery. However, a significant number of patients are not amenable to upfront surgery. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy and interval debulking surgery may be the most suitable approach for this group. This study aimed to evaluate a novel score for prediction of the cytoreduction results at primary debulking surgery for ovarian cancer patients.

METHODS

This observational prospective study was conducted at a tertiary gynecologic oncology center between December 2020 and August 2022. Presumed primary stage III-IV epithelial ovarian carcinoma cases were included. Borderline tumors, and metastatic or non-epithelial ovarian malignancies, were excluded. Based on imaging findings, points were assigned to each anticipated surgical procedure required for complete cytoreduction. The sum of these points was multiplied by the patient's Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) score, and thus, the Cukurova-clinic score was established. Furthermore, the required surgical procedures based on laparoscopic evaluation were recorded, and the score was readjusted and calculated to obtain the Cukurova score.

RESULTS

One hundred and fourteen patients were included in the study. Primary debulking surgery was performed in 70% of cases. Among them, complete cytoreduction (Cukurova score ≤12) was obtained in 97.3% of cases. Complete cytoreduction was not achieved in cases with Cukurova score >12. The odds ratio of 90-day mortality was 13.4 for patients with Cukurova score >12, compared with those with Cukurova score ≤12.

CONCLUSION

The Cukurova score is a model for classifying advanced ovarian cancer patients who may be candidates for primary debulking surgery.

Gynecological Fistulae-Has Anything Changed in the Diagnosis and Treatment over the Last Decade? A Narrative Literature Review

Gynecological fistulae are a rare but severe complication of radiation therapy, pelvic surgery, prolonged labor, cesarean deliveries, or inflammatory bowel diseases. A gynecological fistula is an abnormal pathway formed between the urinary and gynecological tract, most commonly located between the urinary bladder and vagina. Vesico-uterine and vesicovaginal fistulae are an important health issue, common in women of reproductive age in developing countries with limited access to obstetrical care. Various surgical techniques have been described for VVF repair, depending on the location, severity, and cause of the fistula and the surgeon's experience. The purpose of our review was to evaluate the present state of knowledge about the prevalence and treatment of gynecological fistulae. The PubMed scientific database was searched for original articles on the subject of gynecological fistulae that had been published between 2013 and 2023.

Cytoreductive Surgery with HIPEC as Primary Treatment for Advanced Epithelial Ovarian Carcinoma: Upfront or Interval-ISPSM Collaborative Study

Cytoreductive surgery with HIPEC has shown promising results in the interval setting of advanced epithelial ovarian cancer. Its role in upfront setting has not yet been established. All eligible patients underwent CRS-HIPEC as per institution protocol. Relevant data was collected prospectively in institutional HIPEC registry and analyzed retrospectively for the study period from February 2014 to February 2020. Out of 190 patients, 80 underwent CRS-HIPEC in upfront setting and 110 in interval setting. The median age was 54 ± 7.45 years, upfront group had higher PCI (14.1 ± 8.75 vs. 9.6 ± 5.2. 2), and required longer duration of surgery (10.6 ± 1.73 vs. 8.4 ± 1.71 h) had more blood loss (1025 ± 668.76 vs. 680 ± 302.23 ml). The upfront group required more diaphragmatic resections, bowel resections, and multivisceral resections. The overall G3-G4 morbidity was comparable (25.4% vs. 27.3%), upfront group had more surgical morbidity (20% vs. 9.1%) whereas interval group had more medical morbidity, i.e., electrolyte imbalance and hematological. After a median follow-up of 43 months, median DFS was 33 months in the upfront vs. 30 months in the interval group, p = 0.75, median OS was 46 months interval group and was not yet achieved in upfront group.(p = 0.13). Four-year OS was 85% vs. 60%. In patients of advanced EOC upfront CRS HIPEC showed promising outcomes and trend towards better survival with similar morbidity and mortality. The upfront group had more surgical morbidity whereas interval group had more medical morbidity. Multiinstitutional randomized studies are needed to define patient selection and study morbidity patterns and compare the outcomes between CRS-HIPEC in the upfront and interval setting for advanced epithelial ovarian cancer.

Feasibility of extended cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with advanced ovarian cancer in terms of prognosis and surgical outcomes

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to identify the effect of an extended number of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) cycles on prognosis and surgical morbidity after interval debulking surgery (IDS) in patients with newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer.

METHODS

Medical records of patients with advanced ovarian cancer treated with NAC and having undergone IDS were retrospectively reviewed. Clinicopathological factors were compared between two groups: conventional (≤4 cycles) and extended (≥5 cycles) NAC groups. Kaplan-Meier analysis was performed to evaluate progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

A total of 156 patients were included, 112 patients in the conventional group and 44 patients in the extended NAC group. The extended NAC group had a significantly higher frequency of cancer antigen (CA)-125 normalization after NAC (59.1% vs. 33.9%, P = 0.004), a lower rate of bowel surgery (18.2% vs. 34.8%, P = 0.042), and a lower rate of transfusion during or after IDS (36.4% vs. 59.8%, P = 0.008) as compared to the conventional group. The complete cytoreduction rate after IDS was similar between the groups. In multivariate Cox regression analysis for PFS, radiologically stable and progressive disease after NAC (Hazard ratio [HR], 1.983; 95% Confidence interval [CI], 1.141-3.446; P = 0.015) and gross residual tumor after IDS (HR, 2.054; 95% CI, 1.414-2.983; P < 0.001) were independent risk factors for poor PFS. However, extended NAC cycles were not significantly associated with poor PFS. The median PFS was 19.5 and 16.9 months (P = 0.830), and the 5-year OS was 71.4 and 63.2% (P = 0.677) in the conventional and extended NAC groups, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Our study showed that extended NAC cycles were not inferior to conventional NAC cycles in terms of survival in patients with advanced ovarian cancer and reduced surgical morbidity such as bowel surgery and transfusion during or after IDS.

Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Versus Primary Debulking Surgery in FIGO Stage III and IV Epithelial Ovarian, Tubal or Peritoneal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Objective: To investigate whether neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) confers superior outcomes compared to primary debulking surgery (PDS) in patients with stage III and IV epithelial ovarian, tubal or peritoneal cancer as well as in patients with high tumour load. Methods: We searched the electronic databases PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled trials, and Scopus from inception to March 2021. We considered randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing NACT with PDS for women with epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) stages III and IV. The primary outcomes were overall survival and progression-free survival. Secondary outcomes were optimal cytoreduction rates, peri-operative adverse events, and quality of life. Results: Six RCTs with a total of 1901 participants were included. Meta-analysis demonstrated similar overall survival (HR = 0.96, 95% CI [0.86-1.07]) and progression-free survival (HR = 0.98, 95% CI [0.89-1.08]) between NACT and PDS. Subgroup analyses did not demonstrate higher survival for stage IV patients (HR = 0.88, 95% CI [0.71-1.09]) nor for patients with metastatic lesions >5 cm (HR = 0.86, 95% CI [0.69-1.08]) treated with NACT, albeit with some uncertainty due to imprecision. Similarly, no survival benefit was observed in the subgroup of patients with metastatic lesions >10 cm (HR = 0.94, 95% CI [0.78-1.12]). NACT was associated with significantly higher rates of complete cytoreduction (RR = 2.34, 95% CI [1.48-3.71]). Severe peri-operative adverse events were less frequent in the NACT arm (RR = 0.34, 95% CI [0.16-0.72]. Conclusion: Patients with stage III and IV epithelial ovarian cancer undergoing NACT or PDS have similar overall survival. NACT is likely associated with higher rates of complete cytoreduction and lower risk of severe adverse events and peri-operative death.

Relationship Between Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy and Log Odds of Positive Lymph Nodes and Their Prognostic Role in Advanced Ovarian Cancer Patients With Optimal Cytoreductive Surgery

Purpose

To analyze the relationship between neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) and log odds of positive lymph nodes (LODDS), as well as their prognostic role in advanced ovarian cancer (AOC) patients with optimal cytoreductive surgery.

Patients and Methods

From the SEER database during 2010-2016, we identified 1,012 AOC patients with optimal cytoreductive surgery. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression was performed to identify the relationship between NACT and LODDS. Overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) were assessed using the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test. Univariable and multivariable Cox regression was conducted to determine the independent prognostic factors for OS and CSS.

Results

Factors associated with significantly higher NACT odds included older (≥60 years old), married, tumor size ≥ 15 cm, FIGO IV, and LODDS ≤ 0.1. Multivariable Cox regression model confirmed older (≥60 years old), unmarried, separated, divorced, widowed, mucinous histology type, tumor size ≥ 15 cm, and LODDS > 0.1 were correlated with increased risks of OS and CSS. NACT was not an independent prognostic factor for OS and CSS. In the subgroup analyses, LODDS was an independent prognostic factor for OS and CSS in patients with < 75 years old, married, unmarried, FIGO III, and tumor size < 15 cm.

Conclusion

NACT did not show any survival benefit in AOC patients with optimal cytoreductive surgery, but it may be beneficial in reducing LODDS. Meanwhile, clinicians can use grade of LODDS to predict the prognosis of AOC patients with optimal cytoreductive surgery.

Surgery in Advanced Ovary Cancer: Primary versus Interval Cytoreduction

Primary debulking surgery (PDS) has remained the only treatment of ovarian cancer with survival advantage since its development in the 1970s. However, survival advantage is only observed in patients who are optimally resected. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) has emerged as an alternative for patients in whom optimal resection is unlikely and/or patients with comorbidities at high risk for perioperative complications. The purpose of this review is to summarize the evidence to date for PDS and NACT in the treatment of stage III/IV ovarian carcinoma. We systematically searched the PubMed database for relevant articles. Prior to 2010, NACT was reserved for non-surgical candidates. After publication of EORTC 55971, the first randomized trial demonstrating non-inferiority of NACT followed by interval debulking surgery, NACT was considered in a wider breadth of patients. Since EORTC 55971, 3 randomized trials-CHORUS, JCOG0602, and SCORPION-have studied NACT versus PDS. While CHORUS supported EORTC 55971, JCOG0602 failed to demonstrate non-inferiority and SCORPION failed to demonstrate superiority of NACT. Despite conflicting data, a subset of patients would benefit from NACT while preserving survival including poor surgical candidates and inoperable disease. Further randomized trials are needed to assess the role of NACT.

Peri-operative blood management of Jehovah's Witnesses undergoing cytoreductive surgery for advanced ovarian cancer

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and feasibility of a peri-operative bloodless medicine and surgery (BMS) protocol in reducing severe post-operative anaemia (haemoglobin [Hb] <7 g/dL) in Jehovah's Witnesses undergoing cytoreductive surgery for advanced epithelial ovarian cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This was a single-institution retrospective study enrolling Jehovah's Witnesses who underwent elective bloodless surgery for advanced epithelial ovarian cancer between October 2017 and April 2020. All patients followed a standardised bloodless medicine and surgery protocol based on ferric carboxymaltose and erythropoietin if indicated.

RESULTS

Twenty-five patients with a mean age of 61.7 years (range, 35-80) were enrolled. Pre-operatively, ten patients (40%) were mildly anaemic (mean Hb of 10.2 g/dL [range, 9.2-11.4]) and received ferric carboxymaltose. Only four (16%) patients had severe anaemia after surgery (mean Hb of 6.1 g/dL [range, 4.1-6.9]) and received ferric carboxymaltose and erythropoietin. Compared to patients with a post-operative Hb ≥7 g/dL, those with Hb <7 g/dL had higher mean body mass index (25.8±1.8 vs 30.7±1.8 kg/m²; p<0.001), mean baseline CA125 (236.1±184.5 vs 783.7±273.5 IU/mL; p<0.001), median surgical complexity score (2 vs 10; p<0.001), and rate of post-operative complications (14.3 vs 100%; p<0.001). Moreover, these patients had a longer mean operating time (3.4±0.6 vs 5.5±0.4 h; p<0.001), duration of stay in hospital (5.5±0.7 vs 24.0±9.8 days; p<0.001), and time to adjuvant chemotherapy (27.2±2.6 vs 65.3±13.4 days; p<0.001).

DISCUSSION

The use of a multidisciplinary bloodless medicine and surgery protocol is safe and effective in reducing the rate of severe post-operative anaemia and improving surgical and oncological outcomes of Jehovah's Witnesses with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer. Further large-scale, prospective studies are required to confirm these data.

Machine Learning-Based Risk Prediction of Critical Care Unit Admission for Advanced Stage High Grade Serous Ovarian Cancer Patients Undergoing Cytoreductive Surgery: The Leeds-Natal Score

Achieving complete surgical cytoreduction in advanced stage high grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC) patients warrants an availability of Critical Care Unit (CCU) beds. Machine Learning (ML) could be helpful in monitoring CCU admissions to improve standards of care. We aimed to improve the accuracy of predicting CCU admission in HGSOC patients by ML algorithms and developed an ML-based predictive score. A cohort of 291 advanced stage HGSOC patients with fully curated data was selected. Several linear and non-linear distances, and quadratic discriminant ML methods, were employed to derive prediction information for CCU admission. When all the variables were included in the model, the prediction accuracies were higher for linear discriminant (0.90) and quadratic discriminant (0.93) methods compared with conventional logistic regression (0.84). Feature selection identified pre-treatment albumin, surgical complexity score, estimated blood loss, operative time, and bowel resection with stoma as the most significant prediction features. The real-time prediction accuracy of the Graphical User Interface CCU calculator reached 95%. Limited, potentially modifiable, mostly intra-operative factors contributing to CCU admission were identified and suggest areas for targeted interventions. The accurate quantification of CCU admission patterns is critical information when counseling patients about peri-operative risks related to their cytoreductive surgery.

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy before surgery versus surgery followed by chemotherapy for initial treatment in advanced ovarian epithelial cancer

BACKGROUND

Epithelial ovarian cancer presents at an advanced stage in the majority of women. These women require a combination of surgery and chemotherapy for optimal treatment. Conventional treatment has been to perform surgery first and then give chemotherapy. However, there may be advantages to using chemotherapy before surgery.

OBJECTIVES

To assess whether there is an advantage to treating women with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer with chemotherapy before debulking surgery (neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT)) compared with conventional treatment where chemotherapy follows debulking surgery (primary debulking surgery (PDS)).

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the following databases up to 9 October 2020: the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Embase via Ovid, MEDLINE (Silver Platter/Ovid), PDQ and MetaRegister. We also checked the reference lists of relevant papers that were identified to search for further studies. The main investigators of relevant trials were contacted for further information.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of women with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer (Federation of International Gynaecologists and Obstetricians (FIGO) stage III/IV) who were randomly allocated to treatment groups that compared platinum-based chemotherapy before cytoreductive surgery with platinum-based chemotherapy following cytoreductive surgery.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently extracted data and assessed risk of bias in each included trial. We extracted data of overall (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS), adverse events, surgically-related mortality and morbidity and quality of life outcomes.  We used GRADE methods to determine the certainty of evidence.

MAIN RESULTS

We identified 2227 titles and abstracts through our searches, of which five RCTs of varying quality and size met the inclusion criteria. These studies assessed a total of 1774 women with stage IIIc/IV ovarian cancer randomised to NACT followed by interval debulking surgery (IDS) or PDS followed by chemotherapy. We pooled results of the four studies where data were available and found little or no difference with regard to overall survival (OS) (Hazard Ratio (HR) 0.96, 95% CI 0.86 to 1.08; participants = 1692; studies = 4; high-certainty evidence) or progression-free survival in four trials where we were able to pool data (Hazard Ratio 0.98, 95% CI 0.88 to 1.08; participants = 1692; studies = 4; moderate-certainty evidence). Adverse events, surgical morbidity and quality of life (QoL) outcomes were variably and incompletely reported across studies. There are probably clinically meaningful differences in favour of NACT compared to PDS with regard to overall postoperative serious adverse effects (SAE grade 3+): 6% in NACT group, versus 29% in PDS group, (risk ratio (RR) 0.22, 95% CI 0.13 to 0.38; participants = 435; studies = 2; heterogeneity index (I2) = 0%; moderate-certainty evidence). NACT probably results in a large reduction in the need for stoma formation: 5.9% in NACT group, versus 20.4% in PDS group, (RR 0.29, 95% CI 0.12 to 0.74; participants = 632; studies = 2; I2 = 70%; moderate-certainty evidence), and probably reduces the risk of needing bowel resection at the time of surgery: 13.0% in NACT group versus 26.6% in PDS group (RR 0.49, 95% CI 0.30 to 0.79; participants = 1565; studies = 4; I2 = 79%; moderate-certainty evidence). NACT reduces postoperative mortality: 0.6% in NACT group, versus 3.6% in PDS group, (RR 0.16, 95% CI 0.06 to 0.46; participants = 1623; studies = 5; I2 = 0%; high-certainty evidence). QoL on the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) scale produced inconsistent and imprecise results in three studies (MD -0.29, 95% CI -2.77 to 2.20; participants = 524; studies = 3; I2 = 81%; very low-certainty evidence) but the evidence is very uncertain and should be interpreted with caution.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

The available high to moderate-certainty evidence suggests there is little or no difference in primary survival outcomes between PDS and NACT. NACT probably reduces the risk of serious adverse events, especially those around the time of surgery, and reduces the risk of postoperative mortality and the need for stoma formation. These data will inform women and clinicians (involving specialist gynaecological multidisciplinary teams) and allow treatment to be tailored to the person, taking into account surgical resectability, age, histology, stage and performance status. Data from an unpublished study and ongoing studies are awaited.

Postoperative Admission in Critical Care Units Following Gynecologic Oncology Surgery: Outcomes Based on a Systematic Review and Authors' Recommendations

BACKGROUND/AIM

The present study aimed to evaluate the predictors of admission to the Critical Care Units (CCUs) and factors predisposing to prolonged stay in CCUs after gynecological oncology surgery.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Studies which addressed cases of women who underwent surgery for gynecological malignancies and required postoperative CCU admission were included.

RESULTS

Seven studies with 3820 patients were included. Among them, 1680 required admission to CCU. Advanced age, higher Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) score, longer operative times, protracted blood loss and intestinal resection were associated with higher probability of CCU admission. Patients' age, operative times, blood loos and intestinal resection were significant predictors of prolonged stay to CCUs.

CONCLUSION

Admission to CCU and length of stay following surgery for gynecologic malignancies is driven by specific patient characteristics as well as intraoperative values. Further studies are needed to validate high risk patients who will benefit from postoperative care to CCUs to ensure favorable postoperative outcomes and cost-effectiveness.

Chemotherapy versus surgery for initial treatment in advanced ovarian epithelial cancer

BACKGROUND

Epithelial ovarian cancer presents at an advanced stage in the majority of women. These women require surgery and chemotherapy for optimal treatment. Conventional treatment has been to perform surgery first and then give chemotherapy. However, there may be advantages to using chemotherapy before surgery.

OBJECTIVES

To assess whether there is an advantage to treating women with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer with chemotherapy before debulking surgery (neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT)) compared with conventional treatment where chemotherapy follows debulking surgery (primary debulking surgery (PDS)).

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the following databases on 11 February 2019: CENTRAL, Embase via Ovid, MEDLINE (Silver Platter/Ovid), PDQ and MetaRegister. We also checked the reference lists of relevant papers that were identified to search for further studies. The main investigators of relevant trials were contacted for further information.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of women with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer (Federation of International Gynaecologists and Obstetricians (FIGO) stage III/IV) who were randomly allocated to treatment groups that compared platinum-based chemotherapy before cytoreductive surgery with platinum-based chemotherapy following cytoreductive surgery.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently extracted data and assessed risk of bias in each included trial.

MAIN RESULTS

We found 1952 potential titles, with a most recent search date of February 2019, of which five RCTs of varying quality and size met the inclusion criteria. These studies assessed a total of 1713 women with stage IIIc/IV ovarian cancer randomised to NACT followed by interval debulking surgery (IDS) or PDS followed by chemotherapy. We pooled results of the three studies where data were available and found little or no difference with regard to overall survival (OS) (1521 women; Hazard Ratio (HR) 0.95, 95% CI 0.84 to 1.07; I2 = 0%; moderate-certainty evidence) or progression-free survival in four trials where we were able to pool data (1631 women; HR 0.97, 95% CI 0.87 to 1.07; I2 = 0%; moderate-certainty evidence). Adverse events, surgical morbidity and quality of life (QoL) outcomes were poorly and incompletely reported across studies. There may be clinically meaningful differences in favour of NACT compared to PDS with regard to serious adverse effects (SAE grade 3+). These data suggest that NACT may reduce the risk of need for blood transfusion (risk ratio (RR) 0.80; 95% CI 0.64 to 0.99; four studies,1085 women; low-certainty evidence), venous thromboembolism (RR 0.28; 95% CI 0.09 to 0.90; four studies, 1490 women; low-certainty evidence), infection (RR 0.30; 95% CI 0.16 to 0.56; four studies, 1490 women; moderate-certainty evidence), compared to PDS. NACT probably reduces the need for stoma formation (RR 0.43, 95% CI 0.26 to 0.72; two studies, 581 women; moderate-certainty evidence) and bowel resection (RR 0.49, 95% CI 0.26 to 0.92; three studies, 1213 women; moderate-certainty evidence), as well as reducing postoperative mortality (RR 0.18; 95% CI 0.06 to 0.54:five studies, 1571 women; moderate-certainty evidence). QoL on the EORTC QLQ-C30 scale produced inconsistent and imprecise results in two studies (MD -1.34, 95% CI -2.36 to -0.32; participants = 307; very low-certainty evidence) and use of the QLQC-30 and QLQC-Ov28 in another study (MD 7.60, 95% CI 1.89 to 13.31; participants = 217; very low-certainty evidence) meant that little could be inferred.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

The available moderate-certainty evidence suggests there is little or no difference in primary survival outcomes between PDS and NACT. NACT may reduce the risk of serious adverse events, especially those around the time of surgery, and the need for bowel resection and stoma formation. These data will inform women and clinicians and allow treatment to be tailored to the person, taking into account surgical resectability, age, histology, stage and performance status. Data from an unpublished study and ongoing studies are awaited.

Emerging Trends in Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Ovarian Cancer

Simple Summary

Epithelial ovarian cancer is one of the most lethal cancers in women and is typically diagnosed at an advanced-stage. Historically, primary tumor reductive surgery was attempted followed by postoperative chemotherapy in most patients diagnosed with advanced ovarian cancer. However, neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by interval tumor reductive surgery is an alternative approach for patients with advanced-stage ovarian cancer where primary tumor reductive surgery is not feasible. Here, we review proposed models that can assist in selecting patients who would benefit most from neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery.

Abstract

Epithelial ovarian cancer remains a leading cause of death amongst all gynecologic cancers despite advances in surgical and medical therapy. Historically, patients with ovarian cancer underwent primary tumor reductive surgery followed by postoperative chemotherapy; however, neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by interval tumor reductive surgery has gradually become an alternative approach for patients with advanced-stage ovarian cancer for whom primary tumor reductive surgery is not feasible. Decision-making about the use of these approaches has not been uniform. Hence, it is essential to identify patients who can benefit most from neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by interval tumor reductive surgery. Several prospective and retrospective studies have proposed potential models to guide upfront decision-making for patients with advanced ovarian cancer. In this review, we summarize important decision-making models that can improve patient selection for personalized treatment. Models based on clinical factors (clinical parameters, radiology studies and laparoscopy scoring) and molecular markers (circulating and tumor-based) are useful, but laparoscopic staging is among the most informative diagnostic methods for upfront decision-making in patients medically fit for surgery. Further research is needed to explore more reliable models to determine personalized treatment for advanced epithelial ovarian cancer.

Effect of neoadjuvant chemotherapy on health-related quality of life in patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer: results from JCOG0209, a randomized phase III study

BACKGROUND

Although neoadjuvant chemotherapy provides survival benefits in muscle-invasive bladder cancer, the impact of neoadjuvant chemotherapy on health-related quality of life has not been investigated by a randomized trial. The purpose of this study is to compare health-related quality of life in patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by radical cystectomy or radical cystectomy alone based on patient-reported outcome data.

METHODS

Patients were randomized to receive two cycles of neoadjuvant methotrexate, doxorubicin, vinblastine, and cisplatin followed by radical cystectomy or radical cystectomy alone. Health-related quality of life was measured using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Bladder (version 4) questionnaire before the protocol treatments, after neoadjuvant chemotherapy, after radical cystectomy and 1 year after registration.

RESULTS

A total of 99 patients were analysed. No statistically significant differences in postoperative health-related quality of life were found between the arms. In the neoadjuvant chemotherapy arm, the scores after neoadjuvant chemotherapy were significantly lower than the baseline scores in physical well-being, functional well-being, Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General total, weight loss, diarrhoea, appetite, body appearance, embarrassment by ostomy appliance and total Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Bladder. However, there was no difference in scores for these domains, except for embarrassment by ostomy appliance, between the two arms after radical cystectomy and 1 year after registration.

CONCLUSIONS

Although health-related quality of life declined during neoadjuvant chemotherapy, no negative effect of neoadjuvant chemotherapy on health-related quality of life was apparent after radical cystectomy. These data support the view that neoadjuvant chemotherapy can be considered as a standard of care for patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer regarding health-related quality of life.

Death of 43 Indonesian women with ovarian cancer: A case series

•

43 cases of death in Indonesian patients with ovarian cancer.

•

Most of Indonesian patients with ovarian cancer have received treatment.

•

The treatment given to Indonesian patients with ovarian cancer are in the form of chemotherapy and surgical procedures.

•

Diagnosis of ovarian cancer is mostly identified in stage III.

Background

Ovarian cancer is a gynecological cancer with a higher mortality than other gynecological cancers.

Case report

There were 43 cases of Indonesian women who died of ovarian cancer in 2015–2017. Patients were first diagnosed at the age of 40–59 years (65.11%), of which had normal BMI (62.72%) and mostly in stage III (39.53%). The histology was 88.3% epithelial ovarian cancer with the most subtypes of mucinous carcinoma (25.5%). The majority were referral patients (62.7%), but due to its malignancy, many died before receiving ovarian cancer treatment (40.74%). Of the 43 patients, 17 patients received chemotherapy, and 10 patients received a combination of surgical therapy and chemotherapy. Most of the deaths were caused by primary disease (69.77%). Patients with stages III and IV, as well as patients receiving surgery or chemotherapy alone had shorter survival times.

Conclusion

Most ovarian cancer patients are first diagnosed at stage III with the mucinous carcinoma subtype. Most deaths are caused by primary ovarian cancer. The therapy that provides the longest survival is a combination of surgery and chemotherapy.

The Value of Contrast-Enhanced CT in the Detection of Residual Disease After Neo-Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Ovarian Cancer

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the diagnostic performance of contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) in predicting residual disease following neo-adjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) in stage III/IV ovarian cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This was a retrospective observational cohort study including consecutive patients with primary stage III/IV ovarian cancer who received NACT before interval debulking surgery. CT findings before interval debulking surgerywere correlated with histological/surgical findings. Diagnostic characteristics were calculated on patient-based and lesion-based analyses. False negative results on peritoneal carcinomatosis detection were correlated with lesion size and site.

RESULTS

On patient-based analysis, CT (n = 58) had a sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and accuracy of 92.16%, 57.14%, 94.00%, 50.00%, and 87.93%. On lesion-based analysis, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy were 63.01%, 73.47%, 82.51%, 50.00%, and 66.51%. False negative results were associated with lesion size (p < 0.001). The diagnostic performance of CT on the detection of peritoneal carcinomatosis was low at the subdiaphragmatic spaces, bowel serosa and mesentery (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

CT had low negative predictive value in determining residual disease following NACT on both patient-based and lesion-based analyses, especially for non-measurable lesions and at the subdiaphragmatic spaces, bowel serosa and mesentery.

Interval debulking surgery is not worth the wait: a National Cancer Database study comparing primary cytoreductive surgery versus neoadjuvant chemotherapy

OBJECTIVE

In previous studies, neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by interval debulking surgery was not inferior to primary cytoreductive surgery as initial treatment for advanced epithelial ovarian cancer. Our study aimed to compare surgical and survival outcomes between the two treatments in a large national database.

METHODS

Data were extracted from the National Cancer Database from January 2004 to December 2015. Patients with FIGO (International Federation of Gynecologists and Obstetricians) stage III-IV epithelial ovarian cancer and known sequence of treatment were included: primary cytoreductive (surgery=26 717 and neoadjuvant chemotherapy=9885). Tubal and primary peritoneal cancer diagnostic codes were not included. Residual disease after treatment was defined based on recorded data: R0 defined as microscopic or no residual disease; R1 defined as macroscopic residual disease. Multivariate Cox proportional HR was used for survival analysis. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was utilized to compare mortality between groups. Outcomes were adjusted for significant covariates. Validation was performed using propensity score matching of significant covariates.

RESULTS

A total of 36 602 patients were included in the analysis. Patients who underwent primary cytoreductive surgery had better survival than those treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by interval surgery, after adjusting for age, co-morbidities, stage, and residual disease (p<0.001). Primary cytoreductive surgery patients with R0 disease had best median survival (62.6 months, 95% CI 60.5-64.5). Neoadjuvant chemotherapy patients with R1 disease had worst median survival (29.5 months, 95% CI 28.4-31.9). There were small survival differences between primary cytoreductive surgery with R1 (38.9 months) and neoadjuvant chemotherapy with R0 (41.8 months) (HR 0.93, 95% CI 0.87 to 1.0), after adjusting for age, co-morbidities, grade, histology, and stage. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy had 3.5 times higher 30-day mortality after surgery than primary cytoreductive surgery (95% CI 2.46 to 5.64). The 90-day mortality was higher for neoadjuvant chemotherapy in multivariate analysis (HR 1.31, 95% CI 1.06 to 1.61) but similar to primary cytoreductive surgery after excluding high-risk patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Most patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer may benefit from primary cytoreductive surgery. Patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy should be those with co-morbidities unfit for surgery.

Chemotherapy versus surgery for initial treatment in advanced ovarian epithelial cancer

BACKGROUND

Epithelial ovarian cancer presents at an advanced stage in the majority of women. These women require surgery and chemotherapy for optimal treatment. Conventional treatment has been to perform surgery first and then give chemotherapy. However, there may be advantages to using chemotherapy before surgery.

OBJECTIVES

To assess whether there is an advantage to treating women with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer with chemotherapy before debulking surgery (neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT)) compared with conventional treatment where chemotherapy follows debulking surgery (primary debulking surgery (PDS)).

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the following databases on 11 February 2019: CENTRAL, Embase via Ovid, MEDLINE (Silver Platter/Ovid), PDQ and MetaRegister. We also checked the reference lists of relevant papers that were identified to search for further studies. The main investigators of relevant trials were contacted for further information.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of women with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer (Federation of International Gynaecologists and Obstetricians (FIGO) stage III/IV) who were randomly allocated to treatment groups that compared platinum-based chemotherapy before cytoreductive surgery with platinum-based chemotherapy following cytoreductive surgery.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently extracted data and assessed risk of bias in each included trial.

MAIN RESULTS

We found 1952 potential titles, with a most recent search date of February 2019, of which five RCTs of varying quality and size met the inclusion criteria. These studies assessed a total of 1713 women with stage IIIc/IV ovarian cancer randomised to NACT followed by interval debulking surgery (IDS) or PDS followed by chemotherapy. We pooled results of the three studies where data were available and found little or no difference with regard to overall survival (OS) (1521 women; hazard ratio (HR) 1.06; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.94 to 1.19, I2 = 0%; moderate-certainty evidence) or progression-free survival in four trials where we were able to pool data (1631 women; HR 1.02; 95% CI 0.92 to 1.13, I2 = 0%; moderate-certainty evidence). Adverse events, surgical morbidity and quality of life (QoL) outcomes were poorly and incompletely reported across studies. There may be clinically meaningful differences in favour of NACT compared to PDS with regard to serious adverse effects (SAE grade 3+). These data suggest that NACT may reduce the risk of need for blood transfusion (risk ratio (RR) 0.80; 95% CI 0.64 to 0.99; four studies,1085 women; low-certainty evidence), venous thromboembolism (RR 0.28; 95% CI 0.09 to 0.90; four studies, 1490 women; low-certainty evidence), infection (RR 0.30; 95% CI 0.16 to 0.56; four studies, 1490 women; moderate-certainty evidence), compared to PDS. NACT probably reduces the need for stoma formation (RR 0.43, 95% CI 0.26 to 0.72; two studies, 581 women; moderate-certainty evidence) and bowel resection (RR 0.49, 95% CI 0.26 to 0.92; three studies, 1213 women; moderate-certainty evidence), as well as reducing postoperative mortality (RR 0.18; 95% CI 0.06 to 0.54:five studies, 1571 women; moderate-certainty evidence). QoL on the EORTC QLQ-C30 scale produced inconsistent and imprecise results in two studies (MD -1.34, 95% CI -2.36 to -0.32; participants = 307; very low-certainty evidence) and use of the QLQC-30 and QLQC-Ov28 in another study (MD 7.60, 95% CI 1.89 to 13.31; participants = 217; very low-certainty evidence) meant that little could be inferred.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

The available moderate-certainty evidence suggests there is little or no difference in primary survival outcomes between PDS and NACT. NACT may reduce the risk of serious adverse events, especially those around the time of surgery, and the need for bowel resection and stoma formation. These data will inform women and clinicians and allow treatment to be tailored to the person, taking into account surgical resectability, age, histology, stage and performance status. Data from an unpublished study and ongoing studies are awaited.

Efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant chemotherapy versus primary debulking surgery in patients with ovarian cancer: a meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) for the treatment of epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) has remained controversial. This meta-analysis was performed to systematically assess the efficacy and safety of NACT versus primary debulking surgery (PDS) in patients with EOC.

METHODS

PubMed, Embase, ClinicalTrials.gov, and Cochrane Library were queried to assess the therapeutic value of NACT versus PDS in EOC. Electronic databases were queried by using the keywords "ovarian cancer/neoplasms", "primary debulking surgery", and "neoadjuvant chemotherapy".

RESULTS

The available trials were pooled, and hazard ratios (HRs), relative risk ratios (RRs) and associated 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were determined. Sixteen trials involving 57,450 participants with EOC (NACT, 9,475; PDS, 47,975) were evaluated. We found that NACT resulted in markedly decreased overall survival than PDS in patients with EOC (HR=1.30; 95% CI=1.13-1.49; heterogeneity: p<0.001, I²=82.7%). Furthermore, our results demonstrated that the NACT group displayed increased completeness of debulking removal (RR=1.69, 95% CI=1.32-2.17; heterogeneity: p<0.001, I²=81.9%), and reduced risk of postsurgical death (RR=0.18, 95% CI=0.06-0.51; heterogeneity: p=0.698, I²=0%) and major infection (RR=0.29, 95% CI=0.17-0.51; heterogeneity: p=0.777, I²=0%) compared with patients administered PDS.

CONCLUSIONS

This meta-analysis indicated that NACT results in increased completeness of debulking removal, and reduced risk of postsurgical death and major infection compared with PDS, while PDS is associated with improved survival in comparison with NACT in EOC patients.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

PROSPERO Identifier: CRD42019120625.

Evaluating the benefits of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for advanced epithelial ovarian cancer: a retrospective study

Objective

To compare the chemoresistance and survival in patients with stage IIIC or IV epithelial ovarian cancer who were treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) followed by interval debulking surgery (IDS) or primary debulking surgery (PDS). The clinical characteristics of patients who benefited from NACT were further evaluated.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed 220 patients who underwent NACT followed by IDS or PDS from January 2002 to December 2016. Differences in clinicopathological features, chemoresistance and prognosis were analyzed.

Results

The incidence rate for optimal cytoreduction and chemoresistance in the NACT group was relatively higher than PDS group. No differences were observed in progression free survival or overall survival. Patients without macroscopic RD in NACT group (NACT-R0) had a similar prognosis compared to those in PDS group who had RD<1 cm, and a relatively better prognosis compared to the PDS group that had RD ≥ 1 cm. The survival curve showed that patients in NACT-R0 group that were chemosensitive seemed to have a better prognosis compared to patients in PDS group that had RD.

Conclusion

Patients without RD after PDS had the best prognosis, whereas patients with RD after NACT followed by IDS had the worst. However, even if patients achieved no RD, their prognosis varied depending on chemosensitivity. Survival was better in patients who were chemosensitive compared to thosewho underwent PDS but had RD. Hence evaluating the chemosensitivity and feasibility of complete cytoreduction in advance is crucial.

Badary D. Accuracy of radiologic- laparoscopic peritoneal carcinomatosis categorization in the prediction of surgical outcome

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the agreement between multiple detector CT (MDCT) and laparoscopy in the preoperative categorization of peritoneal carcinomatosis, and to determine the impact of this categorization on the prediction of cytoreduction status.

METHODS

This prospective study included 80 consecutive females with primary ovarian cancer eligible for cytoreductive surgery (CRS). MDCT and diagnostic laparoscopy were performed prior to surgery for assessment of peritoneal carcinomatosis extent. Based on PCI (peritoneal cancer index) score, carcinomatosis was categorized into three groups. Categorization agreement between CT and laparoscopy was assessed and compared with the intraoperative-histopathologically proven PCI. Impact of PCI categorization on cytoreduction status was also evaluated.

RESULTS

The overall agreement between CT and laparoscopy in preoperative peritoneal carcinomatosis categorization was good (K =0.71-0.79) in low category group and excellent in both moderate and large group (interclass correlation coeeficient = 0.89-0.91). (p<0.01) Optimal cytoreduction was achieved in 62/80 (77.5%) patients, PCI < 20 was detected in 48/62 (77.4%), pre-operative PCI < 20 correctly predicted optimal cytoreductive surgery (OCS) in 40/48 (83.3%) cases. Suboptimal cytoreduction was performed in 18/80 (22.5%) patients. PCI > 20 was detected in (10/18) 55.6%, preoperative CT and laparoscopy PCI > 20 correctly predicted SCS in 8/10 (80%) cases. The area under receiver operating characteristic curve showed that PCI cut-off <20 was the best predictor of OCS with an accuracy 85%, sensitivity 97%, specificity 40%, negative predictive value 76%, and positive predictive value 93%.

CONCLUSION

Both laparoscopy and CT are equally effective in pre-operative peritoneal carcinomatosis categorization. PCI < 20 is accurate in the prediction of optimal cytoreduction. More than half of patients with suboptimal cytoreduction had PCI > 20 and interval debulking surgery can be recommended.

ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE

Both laparoscopy and CT are equally effective in pre-operative peritoneal carcinomatosis categorization. PCI < 20 is accurate in the prediction of optimal cytoreduction. More than half of patients with suboptimal cytoreduction had PCI > 20 and interval debulking surgery can be recommended.

Clinical Factors Associated with Longer Hospital Stay Following Ovarian Cancer Surgery

Background: Ovarian cancer (OC) is the leading cause of death from gynecologic malignancy and is treated with a combination of cytoreductive surgery and platinum-based chemotherapy. Extended length of stay (LOS) after surgery can affect patient morbidity, overall costs, and hospital resource utilization. The primary objective of this study was to identify factors contributing to prolonged LOS for women undergoing surgery for ovarian cancer. Methods: The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) database was queried to identify women from 2012-2016 who underwent hysterectomy for ovarian, fallopian tube and peritoneal cancer. The primary outcome was LOS >50th percentile. Preoperative and intraoperative variables were examined to determine which were associated with prolonged LOS. Results: From 2012-2016, 1771 women underwent elective abdominal surgery for OC and were entered in the ACS-NSQIP database. The mean and median LOS was 4.6 and 4.0 days (IQR 0-38), respectively. On multivariate analysis, factors associated with prolonged LOS included: American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) Classification III (aOR 1.71, 95% CI 1.38-2.13) or IV (aOR 1.88, 95% CI 1.44-2.46), presence of ascites (aOR 1.88, 95% CI 1.44-2.46), older age (aOR 1.23, 95% CI 1.13-1.35), platelet count >400,000/mm3 (aOR 1.74, 95% CI 1.29-2.35), preoperative blood transfusion (aOR 11.00, 95% CI 1.28-94.77), disseminated cancer (aOR 1.28, 95% CI 1.03-1.60), increased length of operation (121-180 min, aOR 1.47, 95% CI 1.13-1.91; >180 min, aOR 2.78, 95% CI 2.13-3.64), and postoperative blood transfusion within 72 h of incision (aOR 2.04, 95% CI 1.59-2.62) (p < 0.05 for all). Conclusions: Longer length of hospital stay following surgery for OC is associated with many patient, disease, and treatment-related factors. The extent of surgery, as evidenced by perioperative blood transfusion and length of surgical procedure, is a factor that can potentially be modified to shorten LOS, improve patient outcomes, and reduce hospital costs.

Primary debulking surgery vs. interval debulking surgery for advanced ovarian cancer: review of the literature and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

Epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) is the seventh most common cancer among women in the world and the leading cause of death from gynecological malignancies. The standard treatment for advanced EOC consists of optimal primary debulking surgery (PDS) associated with an adjuvant chemotherapy. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) and interval debulking surgery (IDS) have been proposed in the management of advanced EOC to increase the rate of complete citoreductive surgery and to reduce morbidity and mortality. This systematic review and meta-analysis is conducted to compare the oncologic and postoperative outcomes of NACT and IDS with PDS followed by chemotherapy in patients with ovarian cancer.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

We conducted a search on the electronic databases PubMed/Medline, Cochrane and Scopus. All randomized controlled trials, cohort and case-control studies comparing PDS and IDS in ovarian cancer published in English until 28 February 2019 were considered eligible.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

Twenty studies were included in the systematic review. As regards the meta-analysis, only studies that allowed the data we needed to be extracted were included: five were included for the evaluation of overall survival (OS) and PFS and 9 for the evaluation of major postoperative complications and days of hospital stay.

CONCLUSIONS

From the meta-analysis of the current available literature, none of the two investigated procedures has proven to be superior in terms of OS and PFS in the treatment of advanced ovarian cancer. However surgical complexity and postoperative complications are reduced in the IDS group.

ZNF277 regulates ovarian cancer cell proliferation and invasion through inhibition of PTEN

Background

ZNF277 is a transcription factor that is overexpressed in several cancers. However, its clinical role in ovarian cancer (OC) has not been reported yet. The present study aims to investigate the expression of ZNF277 in patients with OC, and to reveal the effects of ZNF277 on the proliferation, migration, and invasion of OC cells.

Methods

Using The Cancer Genome Atlas database, we found that higher expression of ZNF277 was correlated with poorer survival times of OC patients. This study used functional experiments, such as Cell Counting Kit-8 assay, colony formation assay, wound healing assay, and transwell invasion assay. Mechanistically, using quantitative chromatin immunoprecipitation assay, luciferase reporter assay, quantitative reverse-transcription PCR, and Western blot we identified the potential mechanism.

Results

We confirmed for the first time that the expression of ZNF277 is significantly increased in OC tissues and cell lines and that it is closely associated with the adverse clinical features of OC patients. We demonstrated that overexpression of ZNF277 potentiated the proliferation, migration, and invasion of SKOV3 and OVCAR3 loss-of-function experiments showed that the silencing of ZNF277 reduced the proliferation, migration, and invasion of OC cells. Mechanistically, using quantitative chromatin immunoprecipitation assay, luciferase reporter assay, quantitative reverse-transcription PCR, and Western blot we identified that PTEN was a direct downstream target for ZNF277. PTEN expression antagonized the tumor-promoting function of ZNF277.

Conclusion

Taken together, the results of the current study demonstrated that ZNF277 exerted a promoting role in the progression of OC and might act as a promising biomarker and therapeutic target for OC patients.

Localization of distant metastases defines prognosis and treatment efficacy in patients with FIGO stage IV ovarian cancer

BACKGROUND

Patients with ovarian cancer who are diagnosed with Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage IV disease are a highly heterogeneous group with possible survival differences. The FIGO staging system was therefore updated in 2014.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the 2014 changes to FIGO stage IV ovarian cancer on overall survival.

METHODS

We identified all patients diagnosed with FIGO stage IV disease between January 2008 and December 2015 from the Netherlands Cancer Registry. We analyzed the prognostic effect of FIGO IVa versus IVb. In addition, patients with extra-abdominal lymph node involvement as the only site of distant disease were analyzed separately. Overall survival was analyzed by Kaplan-Meier curves and multivariable Cox regression models.

RESULTS

We identified 2436 FIGO IV patients, of whom 35% were diagnosed with FIGO IVa disease. Five-year overall survival of FIGO IVa and IVb patients (including those with no or limited therapy) was 8.9% and 13.0%, respectively (p=0.51). Patients with only extra-abdominal lymph node involvement had a significant better overall survival than all other FIGO IV patients (5-year overall survival 25.9%, hazard ratio 0.77 [95% CI 0.62 to 0.95]).

CONCLUSION

Our study shows that the FIGO IV sub-classification into FIGO IVa and IVB does not provide additional prognostic information. Patients with extra-abdominal lymph node metastases as the only site of FIGO IV disease, however, have a better prognosis than all other FIGO IV patients. These results warrant a critical appraisal of the current FIGO IV sub-classification.

Overexpression of kinesin family member 20A is associated with unfavorable clinical outcome and tumor progression in epithelial ovarian cancer

Background

KIF20A plays an indispensable role in cytokinesis regulation, which is important for tumor proliferation and growth. Recently, the oncogenic role of KIF20A has been well documented in several cancers. However, its clinical role in epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) remains not reported yet. We investigated its expression and its role in promoting invasion and chemoresistance in EOC cells.

Patients and methods

KIF20A transcription and translation levels were investigated in normal ovarian epithelial cell, ovarian cancer cells, and 10 pairs of fresh EOC tissues and adjacent normal ovarian tissues by real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction and Western blots. Moreover, KIF20A protein level was also examined by immunohistochemistry in 150 EOC tissues. The correlation between KIF20A expression and clinical variables was analyzed by statistical methods. We also used wound healing assay, transwell assay MTT, and Annexin V/PI to explore KIF20A functions.

Results

KIF20A expression was obviously elevated at both mRNA and protein levels in EOC cell lines and clinical cancer tissues compared with normal ovarian epithelial cell and adjacent normal ovarian tissues. KIF20A protein expression was highly correlated with International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage (P=0.008), lymph node metastasis (P=0.002), intraperitoneal metastasis (P<0.001), vital status at last follow-up (P<0.001), intraperitoneal recurrence (P=0.030), tumor recurrence (P=0.005), drug resistance (P=0.013), and ascites with tumor cells (P<0.001). KIF20A overexpression was closely related to poorer overall survival and disease progression-free survival. Furthermore, Cox regression analysis revealed that KIF20A can act as an independent hazard indicator for predicting clinical outcomes in EOC patients. Interestingly, KIF20A overexpression promoted invasion and metastasis of EOC cells and also confers resistance to cisplatin.

Conclusion

Our findings indicated that KIF20A overexpression predicts unfavorable clinical outcome, revealing that KIF20A holds a promising potential to serve as a useful prognostic biomarker for EOC patients.

[Surgical treatment of peritoneal metastases from gynecological primary tumors]

BACKGROUND

The principle of surgical treatment of peritoneal metastases of ovarian cancer in the primary as well as in the recurrent disease setting includes macroscopic complete cytoreductive surgery. The addition of intraperitoneal chemotherapy after cytoreduction is currently not part of the standard treatment.

OBJECTIVE

Data on intraperitoneal chemotherapy for treatment of peritoneal metastases of ovarian cancer are presented focusing on overall and progression-free survival and on morbidity and mortality rates.

METHOD

PubMed search including the following terms: ovarian cancer, peritoneal metastases, cytoreduction and HIPEC.

RESULTS

Randomized-controlled and non-randomized controlled trials showed that intraperitoneal chemotherapy after maximum cytoreductive surgery results in a survival benefit regarding overall and progression-free survival for primary as well as recurrent disease. Addition of HIPEC does not impact on the initiation of postoperative systemic chemotherapy.

CONCLUSION

Macroscopic complete cytoreduction is the most important prognostic factor. The addition of intraperitoneal chemotherapy for the treatment of peritoneal metastases of ovarian cancer showed promising results but so far it is not accepted as a part of a multimodal treatment concept.