Radiofrequency ablation is beneficial in simultaneous treatment of synchronous liver metastases and primary colorectal cancer

Perioperative safety and oncological efficacy of simultaneous versus colorectal and liver first two-staged resections in patients with synchronous colorectal liver metastases: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Previous meta-analyses have yielded conflicting results on the optimal surgical treatment strategy in patients with synchronous colorectal liver metastases (sCRLM). This network meta-analysis aims to provide an overview on colorectal-, liver first and simultaneous resections to treat sCRLM.

METHODS

A search was conducted in MEDLINE, Embase and Cochrane CENTRAL (inception-July 11,2023). Pairwise and network meta-analyses were conducted to compare the three strategies, using colorectal-first resections as reference group.

RESULTS

Overall, 46 studies with a total of 20,991 patients were included, a significant portion at a high risk of bias. Simultaneous resections were associated with less blood loss (MD -145.44 ml, 95%CI -239.40 to -51.48) and shorter hospital stays (MD -6.39 days, 95%CI -7.78 to -4.99). Liver-first resections were associated with more transfusions (OR 1.89, 95%CI 1.04 to 3.42) and shorter hospital stays (MD -4.53 days, 95%CI -7.99 to -1.06). Simultaneous resections were associated with less incomplete macroscopic disease clearances (OR 0.33, 95%CI 0.12 to 0.92), while liver-first resections were associated with more incomplete macroscopic disease clearances (OR 2.80, 95%CI 1.16 to 6.73) and less microscopically radical (R0) resections (OR 0.64, 95%CI 0.45 to 0.90). There were no significant differences in morbidity, mortality, disease-free or overall survival.

CONCLUSION

Based on meta-analysis of mainly observational studies, simultaneous resections were associated with less blood loss, shorter length of stay and more complete macroscopic disease clearances.

Does the initial treatment of primary tumor impact prognosis after recurrence in locally advanced rectal cancer? Results from a retrospective cohort analysis

INTRODUCTION

The role of neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) in the treatment of locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) has been well proven, but its impact on patients who relapse remains unknown. This study aims to elucidate the influence of initial treatment and MRI-defined risk factors on postrecurrent survival in patients with LARC recurrence.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

LARC patients who underwent radical surgery and subsequently developed recurrence were retrospectively identified. Patients were stratified on the basis of MRI-defined local risk assessment and the initial treatment modality for the primary tumor (NAT or primary surgery). The patients were classified into four groups: high-risk LARC with NAT (HiN), high-risk LARC with primary surgery (HiS), low-risk LARC with NAT (LoN), and low-risk LARC with primary surgery (LoS). The primary endpoint was survival after recurrence.

RESULTS

A total of 381 patients who experienced relapse were identified from among 2329 LARC patients. Salvage surgery was performed on 33.1% of these patients. Patients who experienced single-site recurrence or who underwent salvage surgery exhibited significantly prolonged survival times after recurrence (P < 0.001). Patients in the HiS group had poorer survival after recurrence than those in the other three groups (P = 0.034). This subset of patients, characterized by receiving less adjuvant treatment after primary surgery, had a shorter recurrence interval than those in the other groups (P = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings reaffirm the prognostic significance of salvage surgery in patients from a LARC cohort who experienced relapse. Moreover, MRI-defined high-risk LARC patients who received upfront surgery without NAT had shorter intervals of recurrence and poorer survival outcomes after recurrence. Our results highlight the critical role of NAT in improving patient survival after recurrence.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Supplementary registration was carried out at clinicaltrials.gov (Registration number: NCT06314737) on March 14, 2024. The study was retrospectively registered.

Trends and overall survival after combined liver resection and thermal ablation of colorectal liver metastases: a nationwide population-based propensity score-matched study

BACKGROUND

In colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) patients, combination of liver resection and ablation permit a more parenchymal-sparing approach. This study assessed trends in use of combined resection and ablation, outcomes, and overall survival (OS).

METHODS

This population-based study included all CRLM patients who underwent liver resection between 2014 and 2022. To assess OS, data was linked to two databases containing date of death for patients treated between 2014 and 2018. Hospital variation in the use of combined minor liver resection and ablation versus major liver resection alone in patients with 2-3 CRLM and ≤3 cm was assessed. Propensity score matching (PSM) was applied to evaluate outcomes.

RESULTS

This study included 3593 patients, of whom 1336 (37.2%) underwent combined resection and ablation. Combined resection increased from 31.7% in 2014 to 47.9% in 2022. Significant hospital variation (range 5.9-53.8%) was observed in the use of combined minor liver resection and ablation. PSM resulted in 1005 patients in each group. Major morbidity was not different (11.6% vs. 5%, P = 1.00). Liver failure occurred less often after combined resection and ablation (1.9% vs. 0.6%, P = 0.017). Five-year OS rates were not different (39.3% vs. 33.9%, P = 0.145).

CONCLUSION

Combined resection and ablation should be available and considered as an alternative to resection alone in any patient with multiple metastases.

Contemporary evidence on colorectal liver metastases ablation: toward a paradigm shift in locoregional treatment

Image-guided percutaneous ablation techniques represent an attractive local therapy for the treatment of colorectal liver metastases (CLM) given its low risk of severe complications, which allows for early initiation of adjuvant therapies and spare functional liver parenchyma, allowing repeated treatments at the time of recurrence. However, ablation does not consistently achieve similar oncological outcomes to surgery, with the latter being currently considered the first-line local treatment modality in international guidelines. Recent application of computer-assisted ablation planning, guidance, and intra-procedural response assessment has improved percutaneous ablation outcomes. In addition, the evolving understanding of tumor molecular profiling has brought to light several biological factors associated with oncological outcomes following local therapies. The standardization of ablation procedures, the understanding of previously unknown biological factors affecting ablation outcomes, and the evidence by ongoing prospective clinical trials are poised to change the current perspective and indications on the use of ablation for CLM.

Image-Guided Ablation for Colorectal Liver Metastasis: Principles, Current Evidence, and the Path Forward

Image-guided ablation can provide effective local tumor control in selected patients with CLM. A randomized controlled trial suggested that radiofrequency ablation combined with systemic chemotherapy resulted in a survival benefit for patients with unresectable CLM, compared to systemic chemotherapy alone. For small tumors, ablation with adequate margins can be considered as an alternative to resection. The improvement of ablation technologies can allow the treatment of tumors close to major vascular structures or bile ducts, on which the applicability of thermal ablation modalities is challenging. Several factors affect the outcomes of ablation, including but not limited to tumor size, number, location, minimal ablation margin, RAS mutation status, prior hepatectomy, and extrahepatic disease. Further understanding of the impact of tumor biology and advanced imaging guidance on overall patient outcomes might help to tailor its application, and improve outcomes of image-guided ablation.

The prognosis of radiofrequency ablation versus hepatic resection for patients with colorectal liver metastases: A systematic review and meta-analysis based on 22 studies

BACKGROUND

Though hepatic resection (HR) is the standard local therapy for patients with colorectal cancer liver metastases (CRLMs), currently, radiofrequency ablation (RFA) may play an alternative role for elderly and vulnerable patients with various organ dysfunctions. This study aims to compare the prognosis of RFA and HR in treatment of CRLMs.

METHODS

A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library and Web of Science up to October 1, 2020 was conducted for relevant studies that compared the prognosis of RFA with HR in the treatment of CRLMs. The primary outcomes were 30-day mortality, long-term recurrence, overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS). The secondary outcomes were various factors of OS, recurrence-free survival (RFS), survival, recurrence and complication.

RESULTS

A total of 22 studies including 4385 CRLM patients were identified. There was no significant difference between RFA and HR in 30-day mortality, with a pooled OR of 0.88 (95% CI 0.34-2.29; P = 0.80). CRLM patients undergoing RFA experienced significantly higher incidences of marginal and intrahepatic recurrence than HR, with pooled ORs of 7.09 (95% CI 4.56-11.2; 1251 pts) and 2.02 (95% CI 1.24-3.28; 1038 pts). In addition, RFA showed lower 1-, 3- and 5-yr OS rate than HR with pooled ORs of 0.39, 0.40 and 0.60 respectively. A lower 5-yr DFS rate was also found in RFA than HR group, with a pooled OR of 0.74 (95% CI 0.56-0.97; P = 0.03; 1231 pts). Multivariable analysis showed that tumor size, multiple tumors, age, primary node positive and metachronous metastasis were independent factors of OS, and multiple tumors was also an independent factor of RFS.

CONCLUSIONS

Though the 30-day mortality of RFA was equal to HR, RFA showed a higher recurrence rate and poor long-term survival outcomes for CRLM patients. Tumor size, multiple tumors, age, primary node positive and metachronous metastasis were independent factors of survival. However, the results were limited because of the inequality baseline characteristics between the comparative groups. Randomized or propensity score matching studies should be performed to clarify the effectiveness of RFA and to determine target populations that benefit most from RFA in the future.

The evolution of interventional oncology in the 21st century

Interventional oncology (IO) has proven to be highly efficient in the local therapy of numerous malignant tumors in addition to surgery, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy. Due to the advent of immune-oncology with the possibility of tumor control at the molecular and cellular levels, a system change is currently emerging. This will significantly rule oncology in the coming decades. Therefore, one cannot think about IO in the 21st century without considering immunology. For IO, this means paying much more attention to the immunomodulatory effects of the interventional techniques, which have so far been neglected, and to explore the synergistic possibilities with immuno-oncology. It can be expected that the combined use of IO and immuno-oncology will help to overcome the limitations of the latter, such as limited local effects and a high rate of side-effects. To do this, however, sectoral boundaries must be removed and interdisciplinary research efforts must be strengthened. In case of success, IO will face an exciting future.

Clinical analysis of ultrasound-guided radiofrequency ablation for recurrent colorectal liver metastases after hepatectomy

Background

RFA is designed to produce localized tumor destruction by heating the tumor and surrounding liver tissue, especially suitable for patients who do not qualify for hepatic resection. Many studies have reported that RFA was inferior to hepatectomy in the treatment of recurrent colorectal liver metastases. However, strong evidence is lacking in the literature. This study aimed to investigate the effect and clinical outcome of percutaneous ultrasound-guided RFA and repeat hepatic resection for recurrent colorectal liver metastases after hepatectomy.

Methods

From January 2007 to January 2014, 194 patients with recurrent colorectal liver metastases after hepatectomy diagnosed in our hospital was performed, and then divided into two groups based on different regimens: repeat hepatic resection group and RFA group. The clinical data of the two groups were analyzed. After treatment, the liver function-related indexes, complication rate, survival rate, and tumor recurrence of the two groups were recorded. The difference in short-term and long-term effects between repeat hepatic resection and RFA was identified by propensity score analysis.

Results

The number of metastases and the proportion of left and right lobe involved by tumor and preoperative chemotherapy in the RFA group were higher than those in the repeat hepatic resection group. The clinical data showed no significant difference between the two groups after using propensity score analysis. Compared with the RFA group, the liver function of the repeat hepatic resection group was significantly improved. After adjustment for potential confounders, no significant difference in liver function-related indexes was found between RFA and repeat hepatic resection, and the incidence of complications in the RFA group was lower. In survival analysis, there was no significant difference in OS and DFS between the two groups.

Conclusions

RFA is a safe and effective therapeutic option for patients with recurrent colorectal liver metastases after hepatectomy.

Role of thermal ablation in the management of colorectal liver metastasis

With a recent randomized prospective trial revealing that thermal ablative therapy as local tumor control improved overall survival (OS) in patients with unresectable colorectal cancer liver metastases (CRLM), thermal ablation continues to remain as an important treatment option in this patient population. Our aim of this article is to review the current role of the ablative therapy in the management of CRLM patients. Main indications for thermal ablation include (I) unresectable liver lesions; (II) in combination with hepatectomy; (III) in patients with significant medical comorbidities or poor performance status (PS); (IV) a small (<3 cm) solitary lesion, which would otherwise necessitate a major liver resection; and (V) patient preference. There are several approaches and modalities for ablative therapy, including open, percutaneous, and laparoscopic approaches, as well as radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and microwave ablation (MWA). Each approach and ablation modality have its own pros and cons. Percutaneous and laparoscopic approaches are preferred due to minimally invasive nature, yet laparoscopic approach has more benefits from thorough intraoperative ultrasound (US) exam as well as complete peritoneal staging with laparoscopy. Similarly, whereas high local tumor failure rate has been a major concern with RFA, MWA or microwave thermosphere ablation (MTA) have demonstrated significantly improved local tumor control due to homogenous tissue heating, ability to reach higher tissue temperatures, and less susceptible to the "heat-sink" effect. Although liver resection is the standard of care for CRLM, there have been some retrospective studies demonstrating similar oncological outcome between ablative therapy and surgical resection in very selected populations with small (<3 cm) solitary CRLM. Lastly, ablative therapy and liver resection should not be mutually exclusive, especially in the management of bilobar liver metastases. Concomitant ablative therapy with hepatectomy may spare the patients from having two-stage hepatectomy with less morbidity. The role of the thermal ablation will continue to evolve in patients with resectable and ablatable lesions owing to newly emerging technology, in addition to new systemic treatment options, including immunotherapy for metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC).