The deferred embryo transfer strategy improves cumulative pregnancy rates in endometriosis-related infertility: A retrospective matched cohort study

Management of women with endometriosis in the 21st century

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Endometriosis is a chronic inflammatory condition that significantly affects women's quality of life and fertility. Despite advancements in treatment, many areas of uncertainty persist in clinical management. This review provides a symptom-focused, patient-centered update, addressing cases from asymptomatic to those complicated by pain and infertility.

RECENT FINDINGS

Advancement in imaging technology has increased incidental diagnoses of asymptomatic endometriosis, raising the debate between immediate treatment and watchful waiting. Medical therapy primarily aims to suppress symptoms, with oral gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonists and add-back therapy offering promising long-term pain control. Research into local neurogenesis and central sensitization supports complementary approaches, though high-quality evidence is still limited. For pain refractory to medical therapy, conservative surgical strategies can minimize postoperative complications without significantly increasing recurrence rates. In infertility, assisted reproductive technology (ART) provides effective options, although the optimal endometrial preparation and the necessity of pre-ART surgery remain to be fully elucidated.

SUMMARY

The optimal management of endometriosis requires a personalized, multidisciplinary approach within specialized centers. Long-term suppressive medical therapy remains the cornerstone of pain management while emerging targeted agents hold promise for better symptom control with fewer side effects. Surgical intervention should be performed by experienced surgeons as a single definitive procedure when possible. Tailored ART protocols can address infertility challenges. Standardized classification systems and robust randomized trials are crucial to refining treatment pathways, optimizing fertility outcomes, and enhancing quality of life.

Reduced live birth rates following ART in adenomyosis patients: a matched control study

STUDY QUESTION

How does adenomyosis affect live birth rates (LBRs) in women undergoing ART compared to a matched control population?

SUMMARY ANSWER

Women with adenomyosis, matched with controls for age, blastocyst count, and top-quality blastocyst count, exhibited reduced LBR following IVF/ICSI treatment.

WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY

Adenomyosis, a benign uterine disorder, is believed to hinder implantation due to anatomical, hormonal, and immune disruptions. Its precise impact on LBRs following ART, however, remains controversial, with studies presenting inconsistent outcomes. It is uncertain whether adenomyosis directly reduces ART success or if confounding factors such as age or embryo quality play a more significant role.

STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION

This observational study included women aged 18-42 years undergoing IVF/ICSI treatments with a freeze-all strategy from 1 January 2018 to 31 December 2022, each having at least one available blastocyst for transfer. The adenomyosis group consisted of patients with a confirmed diagnosis through pelvic MRI, interpreted by gynecologic radiologists. The control group included women without adenomyosis, who had idiopathic, tubal, and/or male factor infertility.

PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS

A total of 285 women with adenomyosis were included. These patients were matched 1:1 with controls based on age, the number of cryopreserved blastocysts, and the number of top-quality blastocysts. The primary outcome was the cumulative LBR per patient following a single oocyte retrieval, with secondary outcomes including clinical pregnancy rate (CPR) and early miscarriage rate (EMR). Both univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted.

MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE

In this study, 285 women with adenomyosis were matched with 285 controls. The mean age was 35.4 ± 3.3 and 35.5 ± 3.4 years, respectively, with an average of 3.5 ± 2.5 and 3.6 ± 2.6 cryopreserved blastocysts and 0.4 ± 0.7 and 0.4 ± 0.5 top-quality blastocysts, respectively. In the adenomyosis group, MRI revealed internal diffuse adenomyosis in 73.7% of patients, adenomyoma in 3.5%, and external adenomyosis lesions in 46.7%. The cumulative LBR was significantly lower in the adenomyosis group compared to controls (41.4% versus 51.9%; odds ratio = 0.65, 95% CI [0.47-0.91]; P = 0.012). Similarly, the CPR was reduced in the adenomyosis group (53.3% versus 63.9%; P = 0.011). No significant difference was found in the EMR. Multivariate analysis, adjusted for confounders such as freeze-all indication, AMH levels, BMI, infertility type, and ART procedure (IVF versus ICSI), identified adenomyosis as an independent risk factor for reduced LBR (OR = 0.7, 95% CI [0.4-0.9]). These findings indicate that adenomyosis is associated with lower ART success rates.

LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION

Patients included in this study were from a specialized referral center focusing on the management of endometriosis and adenomyosis, potentially introducing selection bias, as these women may have more severe forms of adenomyosis.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS

For infertile women, it is crucial for practitioners to conduct comprehensive clinical and imaging assessments to detect adenomyosis. Continued research is needed to refine and personalize ART management strategies for patients affected by this condition.

STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S)

No external funding was received. P.V. is the co-editor-in-chief of the Journal of Endometriosis and Uterine Disorders. C.M. has received payments to her institution from Merck, Ferring, Theramex, Gedeon Richer, and Besins, as well as direct payments to her from Gedeon Richter and Ferring and honoraria from Merck Serono, Ferring, Besins, IBSA, and Organon and meeting/travel support but no payment from Ferring, Besins, and Gedeon Richter. C.C. has received grants from Merck, Ferring, Theramex, Gedeon Richter, and Besins, which were paid to his institution, and honoraria from Merck, Besins, Gedeon Richter, and Theramex, which he received directly. He has also received support for attending meetings from Besins, Gedeon Richter, and Merck but no payment. He is a founder and past-president of the Society for Endometriosis and Uterine Disorders (SEUD), an unpaid role. P.S. received grants or contracts from Merck, Ferring, Theramex, Gedeon Richter, Besins, paid to his institution, and direct payment to him for presentations and lectures from Merck, Ferring, Besins, Gedeon Richter, Theramex, IBSA, and General Electric Medical Systems. He also received travel support but no payment from Merck, Ferring, Besins, Gedeon Richter, Theramex, and IBSA. P.S. is a board member of the SEUD and an editorial board member of RBMO and GOF. C.P. has received payment for lectures and presentations from Ferring and support but no payment for attending meetings from Ferring. M.B. has received grants from Merck, Ferring, Theramex, Gedeon Richter, and Besins, which were paid to her institution, and direct payment from Merck, Ferring, Gedeon Richter, Theramex, IBSA, and Organon for lectures/presentations. She has also received support but not payment for attending meetings from Ferring and Gedeon Richter.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

Not applicable.

Critical appraisal and narrative review of the literature in IVF/ICSI patients with adenomyosis and endometriosis

Endometriosis and adenomyosis are prevalent causes of infertility, often coexisting in a significant proportion of patients. Although endometriosis typically does not negatively impact assisted reproductive technology (ART) outcomes, the presence of coexisting adenomyosis, mainly non-severe external forms, may slightly influence IVF/ICSI success rates. However, this impact is often minimal and may result in insignificant changes in statistical analyses. Recent studies underscore the critical role of accurate diagnostic techniques, such as ultrasound or MRI, in identifying severe adenomyosis characteristics, including diffuse involvement with junctional zone participation. This precise delineation is reassuring, as it is essential for tailoring assisted reproductive technology (ART) strategies to enhance success rates and reduce the confounding effects of adenomyosis, particularly when it coexists with endometriosis. Strategic approaches, such as ultralong GnRH agonist protocols or freeze-all strategies, may provide advantages in these scenarios. However, the need for extensive research is vital to understanding the complex interactions between endometriosis, adenomyosis, and ART outcomes. This ongoing exploration is particularly important in cases where coexisting adenomyosis might not significantly influence statistical results.

Effects of various controlled ovarian hyperstimulation protocols and surgery on pregnancy outcomes in women with endometriosis

Endometriosis is a common gynecological condition in women of childbearing age that causes symptoms such as menstrual changes and dysmenorrhea, and is also a major cause of infertility. Therefore, women with endometriosis usually need to use assisted reproductive technology (ART), such as in vitro fertilization or intracytoplasmic sperm injection, to increase their chances of conceiving. Numerous clinical observations and studies have indicated that endometriosis can affect the success of ART, such that women with endometriosis who use ART have a lower live-birth rate than those without endometriosis who use ART. Therefore, this article reviews the impact of various controlled ovarian hyperstimulation protocols and surgery on the pregnancy outcomes of women with endometriosis using ART to explore the selection of individualized treatment.

Evidence based management of patients with endometriosis undergoing assisted conception: British fertility society policy and practice recommendations

Endometriosis is a chronic inflammatory condition in women of reproductive age, which can lead to infertility and pelvic pain. Endometriosis associated infertility is multifactorial in nature adversely affecting each step of the natural reproductive physiology and thereby processes and outcomes of Assisted Reproductive Technology (ART) cycles. These outcomes are further complicated by the subtype of endometriosis, being peritoneal, deep infiltrating and ovarian, which bear negative effects on ovarian reserve, response to stimulation, accessibility for oocyte retrieval, intraoperative safety and endometrial receptivity. There is still a lack of clear guidance about the role of surgery for ovarian endometriosis/endometriomas. This guideline evaluates the evidence of the impact of pelvic endometriosis and endometriomas on the outcome of ART and provides recommendations for management options before and during ART including intra-uterine insemination. Recommendations are made based on the current evidence for the management of patients with endometriosis across each step of ART with the primary aim of improving ART outcomes.

Improving reproductive outcomes in frozen embryo transfer over fresh embryo transfer in women with endometrioma: A historical cohort study

Background

Endometrioma, a common manifestation of endometriosis, often indicates the severity of the disease. In vitro fertilization and embryo transfer (ET) are key therapeutic strategies for infertility associated with endometriosis. However, the optimal type of ET (frozen or fresh) and its impact on pregnancy success rates remain debated, with limited studies available.

Objective

This historical cohort study aimed to compare fertility and neonatal outcomes, focusing on live birth rate (LBR), clinical pregnancy, and implantation rates in women with endometrioma-associated infertility, between fresh and frozen embryo transfer (FET).

Materials and Methods

In this historical cohort study, the medical records (files) of 289 women diagnosed with endometrioma-related infertility, who underwent in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection treatment at Royan Institute, Tehran, Iran between March 2016-2021 were reviewed. Ultimately, 200 files that met the established criteria were selected for review. The extracted data was then compared between groups: FET (n = 121) and fresh ET (n = 79).

Results

No significant differences were observed between the groups in terms of demographic characteristics and endometrioma size. The only significant difference in fertility outcomes was the LBR, which was 36.4% for the FET group compared to 22.8% for the fresh ET group (p = 0.04). No significant differences were observed in neonatal outcomes between the groups. Overall, our study suggests that FET may lead to higher LBRs in women diagnosed with endometrioma.

Conclusion

Our study suggests that FET may lead to higher LBRs in women diagnosed with endometrioma.

Assessment of the Pelvic Pain Experienced by Infertile Women is of Prime Importance for Diagnosing Endometriosis

OBJECTIVE

To provide evidence regarding the significance of painful symptoms among women suffering from infertility.

DESIGN

An observational retrospective cross-sectional study.

SETTINGS

University hospital-based research center.

PATIENTS

Infertile patients aged between 18 and 42 years surgically explored for benign gynecological conditions between 01-2004 and 12-2020.

INTERVENTIONS

For each patient, a standardized questionnaire was completed during a face-to-face interview conducted by the surgeon in the month preceding the surgery. Preoperative assessment the pain symptoms was recorded. Pain intensity was assessed with a 10cm visual analog scale (VAS). The pain was considered to be severe when the VAS score was ≥ 7.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Surgery was performed in 839 infertile women. 451 women had severe pelvic pain. Infertile patients with severe pain significantly more often had endometriosis (67.4% versus 30.7% respectively; p <.001) than infertile women without severe pelvic pain, and especially deep infiltrating lesions (43.2% versus 8.5% respectively; p <.001). Moreover, these women more often had intestinal endometriosis lesions (28.4% vs 1.8%; p <.001). After multivariable regression analysis, the presence of endometriosis, irrespective of the phenotype (superficial lesions (OR1.84 [1.19-2.86] and/or ovarian endometrioma OR 2.79 [1.70-4.59] and/or deep infiltrating endometriosis OR 4.49 [2.69-7.51]), and the presence of at least one intestine endometriosis lesion (OR6.49 [2.69-7.51] were significantly associated with severe pelvic pain.

CONCLUSION

Severe pelvic pain is significantly associated with endometriosis and especially deep infiltrating lesions in a population of infertile women. These results demonstrate the importance of thorough questioning regarding pelvic pain symptoms during the initial management of infertile patients.

Impact of prolonged embryo storage on reproductive and neonatal outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

To analyze the influence of embryo storage on reproductive and neonatal results in patients undergoing in vitro fertilization (IVF) treatment.

METHODS

PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and BioMed Central databases were searched from inception up to June 2024 for studies comparing reproductive and neonatal outcomes in patients undergoing frozen embryo transfer within 12 months from embryo storage versus more than 12 months after embryo storage. Data were pooled by meta-analysis using a random effects model.

RESULTS

A total of 16 studies, involving 233,315 embryos were included. Patients undergoing frozen embryo within 12 months from embryo storage were associated with higher rates of live birth (OR 1.17, 95% CI 1.09-1.26, I2 = 78%) biochemical pregnancy (OR 1.26, 95% CI 1.08-1.47, I2 = 77.8%) clinical pregnancy (OR 1.24, 95% CI 1.12-1.38, I2 = 86.3%) and multiple pregnancy rate (OR 1.26, 95% CI 1.03-1.55, I2 = 69%). No significant differences between groups were shown in terms of survival rate (OR 1.52, 95% CI 0.65-3.58, I2 = 98.5%), miscarriage (OR 1.08, 95% CI 0.91-1.27, I2 = 77%), implantation rate (OR 1.17, 95% CI 0.90-1.52, I2 = 91.7%) and ectopic pregnancy (OR 0.98, 95% CI 0.80-1.20, I2 = 0%). In addition, prolonged embryo storage was not associated with higher rates of preterm delivery (OR 0.86, 95% CI 0.67-1.09, I2 = 8.3%), low weight at birth (OR 1.10, 95% CI 0.88-1.38, I2 = 24.3%) or congenital malformations (OR 0.90, 95% CI 0.65-1.25, I2 = 0.8%).

CONCLUSION

Prolonged embryo storage over 12 months is associated with lower rates of live birth, biochemical pregnancy, clinical pregnancy, and multiple pregnancy. However, important covariates such as reasons for delay of transfer, embryo quality, and improper handling of embryos could not be ruled out as causes of this reduction. Given these limitations, these conclusions should be viewed with caution.

Endometriosis and In Vitro Fertilization

In vitro fertilization (IVF) is an established option for the management of infertility in patients with endometriosis, though there remains ongoing debate around the extent to which endometriosis may compromise IVF treatment success, in which fertilization and preimplantation embryo development occur outside the pelvis. Whether endometriosis impacts oocyte and embryo quality and/or endometrial receptivity remains central to this debate. Here, we review the current literature relating to the impact of endometriosis on IVF outcomes and management strategies to consider when performing IVF treatment.

The Current Understanding of Molecular Mechanisms in Adenomyosis-Associated Infertility and the Treatment Strategy for Assisted Reproductive Technology

Adenomyosis, endometriosis of the uterus, is associated with an increased likelihood of abnormal endometrial molecular expressions thought to impair implantation and early embryo development, resulting in disrupted fertility, including the local effects of sex steroid and pituitary hormones, immune responses, inflammatory factors, and neuroangiogenic mediators. In the recent literature, all of the proposed pathogenetic mechanisms of adenomyosis reduce endometrial receptivity and alter the adhesion molecule expression necessary for embryo implantation. The evidence so far has shown that adenomyosis causes lower pregnancy and live birth rates, higher miscarriage rates, as well as adverse obstetric and neonatal outcomes. Both pharmaceutical and surgical treatments for adenomyosis seem to have a positive impact on reproductive outcomes, leading to improved pregnancy and live birth rates. In addition, adenomyosis has negative impacts on reproductive outcomes in patients undergoing assisted reproductive technology. This association appears less significant after patients follow a long gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa) protocol, which improves implantation rates. The pre-treatment of GnRHa can also be beneficial before engaging in natural conception attempts. This review aims to discover adenomyosis-associated infertility and to provide patient-specific treatment options.

Impact of Endometriosis Surgery on In Vitro Fertilization/Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection Outcomes: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Endometriosis-related infertility remains a therapeutic challenge. A burning issue in this field of research is determining whether pre-assisted reproductive technology (ART) surgery may be of some benefit in terms of reproductive outcomes. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed at comparing ongoing pregnancy rates (OPR) and/or live birth rates (LBR) in patients who underwent endometriosis surgery before ART (IVF/ICSI) in comparison with patients who underwent first-line ART (IVF/ICSI). Searches were conducted from January 1990 to June 2021 on PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library using the following search terms: endometriosis, surgery, reproductive outcomes, and IVF/ICSI. The primary outcomes were OPR or LBR. A total of 19 studies were included in the meta-analysis. No statistically significant differences in LBR [0.91[0.63, 1.30]; I2 = 66%; n = 11], OPR [1.28[0.66, 2.49]; I2 = 60%; n = 3], and early pregnancy loss rate [0.88[0.62, 1.25]; I2 = 0%; n = 7] per cycle were found when comparing patients who underwent endometriosis surgery before IVF/ICSI and those who did not. After the exclusion of the studies with high risks of bias, the LBR per cycle was significantly reduced in the case of surgical treatment before IVF/ICSI [0.53[0.33, 0.86]; I2 = 30%; n = 4]. These data urge the clinician to carefully weigh the pros and cons before referring infertile patients with endometriosis to surgery before IVF, highlighting the key role of multidisciplinary referral centers.

Endometriosis diagnosed by ultrasound is associated with lower live birth rates in women undergoing their first in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection treatment

OBJECTIVE

To study the cumulative live birth rate (CLBR) after the first in vitro fertilization (IVF) or intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) treatment in women with or without deep-infiltrating endometriosis (DIE) and/or endometrioma diagnosed by transvaginal ultrasonography (TVUS), using the International Deep Endometriosis Analysis (IDEA) group definitions.

DESIGN

Prospective observational cohort study at a university hospital.

PATIENTS(S)

In total, 1,040 women with subfertility aged 25 to ≤39 years were undergoing their first IVF/ICSI treatment between January 2019 and October 2022. Of these, 234 (22.5%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 20.0-25.0) women were diagnosed with DIE and/or endometrioma at systematic TVUS before starting their treatment.

INTERVENTION(S)

All women underwent their first IVF or ICSI treatment. Fresh and/or frozen embryos from the first cycle were used until pregnancy was achieved or no embryos remained.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

Cumulative live birth rate after the first IVF/ICSI cycle in women with or without DIE and/or endometrioma.

RESULT(S)

The CLBR after the first IVF/ICSI treatment in the total cohort of women was 426/1,040 (41.0%; 95% CI, 38.0-44.0). Women with DIE and/or endometrioma had a lower CLBR (78/234, 33.3%; 95% CI, 27.3-39.4) than women without the disease (348/806, 43.2%; 95% CI, 39.8-46.6). The crude relative risk (RR) for cumulative live birth for women with DIE and/or endometrioma was 0.77; 95% CI, 0.63-0.94, and after adjustments were made for age, body mass index, s-antimüllerian hormone, stimulation protocol, and day for embryo transfer, the adjusted RR was 0.63; 95% CI, 0.48-0.82. There was no difference in the number of retrieved mature oocytes, fertilization rate, or good quality embryos between the 2 groups.

CONCLUSION

The presence of DIE and/or endometrioma diagnosed by TVUS lowers the chance of live birth in women undergoing their first IVF/ICSI treatment.

Fresh or frozen day 6 blastocyst transfer: is there still a question?

BACKGROUND

The Live Birth Rate (LBR) after day 5 (D5) blastocyst transfer is significantly higher than that with D6 embryos in both fresh and frozen-vitrified embryo transfer cycles, according to the most recently published meta-analyses. Therefore, for women obtaining only D6 blastocysts, the chances of pregnancy may be lower but nonetheless sufficient to warrant transferring such embryos. The best strategy for transfer (i.e., in fresh versus frozen cycles) remains unclear and there is a paucity of data on this subject.

METHODS

A total of 896 couples with D6 single blastocyst transfers were retrospectively analyzed: patients receiving a fresh D6 embryo transfer (Fresh D6 transfer group, n = 109) versus those receiving a frozen-thawed D6 embryo transfer (Frozen D6 transfer group, n = 787). A subgroup comprising a freeze-all cycle without any previous fresh or frozen D5 embryo transfers (Elective frozen D6, n = 77) was considered and also compared with the Fresh D6 transfer group. We compared LBR between these two groups. Correlation between D6 blastocyst morphology according to Gardner's classification and live birth occurrence was also evaluated. Statistical analysis was carried out using univariate and multivariate logistic regression models.

RESULTS

The LBR was significantly lower after a fresh D6 blastocyst transfer compared to the LBR with a frozen-thawed D6 blastocyst transfer [5.5% (6/109) vs. 12.5% (98/787), p = 0.034]. Comparison between LBR after Elective frozen D6 group to the Fresh D6 blastocyst transfers confirmed the superiority of frozen D6 blastocyst transfers. Statistical analysis of the blastocyst morphology parameters showed that both trophectoderm (TE) and inner cell mass (ICM) grades were significantly associated with the LBR after D6 embryo transfer (p < 0.001, p = 0.037). Multiple logistic regression revealed that frozen D6 thawed transfer was independently associated with a higher LBR compared with fresh D6 transfer (OR = 2.54; 95% CI: [1.05-6.17]; p = 0.038). Our results also show that transferring a good or top-quality D6 blastocyst increased the chances of a live birth by more than threefold.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results indicate that transferring D6 blastocysts in frozen cycles improves the LBR, making it the best embryo transfer strategy for these slow-growing embryos.

CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER

Not applicable.

The "freeze-all" strategy seems to improve the chances of birth in adenomyosis-affected women

OBJECTIVE

To compare assisted reproductive technologies (ARTs) outcomes between fresh vs. freeze-all strategies in infertile women affected by adenomyosis.

DESIGN

A single-center observational study.

SETTINGS

University hospital-based research center.

PATIENTS

Adenomyosis-affected women undergoing blastocyst embryo transfer after in vitro fertilization and intracytoplasmic sperm injection between January 1, 2018, and November 31, 2021. The diagnosis of adenomyosis was based on imaging criteria (i.e., transvaginal ultrasound and/or magnetic resonance imaging).

INTERVENTION(S)

Women who underwent a freeze-all strategy were compared with those who underwent a fresh embryo transfer (ET) strategy.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

Cumulative live birth rate (LBR).

RESULTS

A total of 306 women were included in the analysis: 111 in the fresh ET group and 195 in the freeze-all group. The adenomyosis phenotype (internal diffuse adenomyosis, external focal adenomyosis, and adenomyoma) was not significantly different between the two groups. The cumulative LBR (86 [44.1%] vs. 34 [30.6%], respectively), and the cumulative ongoing pregnancy rate (88 [45.1%] vs. 36 [32.4%], respectively) were significantly higher in the freeze-all group compared with the fresh ET group. After multivariate logistic regression analysis, the freeze-all strategy in women with adenomyosis was associated with significantly higher odds of live birth compared with fresh ET (odds ratio = 1.80; 95% confidence interval = 1.02-3.16).

CONCLUSION

The freeze-all strategy in women afflicted with adenomyosis undergoing ART was associated with significantly higher cumulative LBRs. Our preliminary results suggest that the freeze-all strategy is an attractive option that increases ART success rates. Additional studies, with a randomized design, should be conducted to further test whether the freeze-all strategy enhances the pregnancy rate in adenomyosis-affected women.

Oocyte donation outcomes in endometriosis patients with multiple IVF failures

RESEARCH QUESTION

What are the reproductive outcomes and the prognostic factors of live birth rates in patients with endometriosis referred to oocyte donation after multiple IVF failures?

DESIGN

Observational cohort study including all women with endometriosis-related infertility and two or more failed IVF/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) cycles referred to oocyte donation between January 2013 and June 2022. Endometriosis was diagnosed based on published imaging criteria, and was confirmed histologically in women who had a history of surgery for endometriosis. The main outcome measured was the cumulative live birth rate (CLBR). The characteristics of women who had a live birth were compared with those who did not using univariate and multivariate analysis to identify determinant factors of fertility outcome.

RESULTS

Fifty-seven patients underwent 90 oocyte donation cycles after 244 failed autologous IVF cycles. The mean ± SD age of the population was 36.8 ± 3.3 years, with a mean duration of infertility of 3.6 ± 2.2 years, and a mean number of autologous IVF/ICSI cycles of 4.4 ± 2.3 cycles per patient. Three patients (5.3%) had superficial peritoneal endometriosis, two patients (3.5%) had ovarian endometriomas, and 52 patients (91.2%) had deep infiltrating endometriosis, among which 30 patients (57.7%) had bowel lesions. Thirty patients (52.6%) had associated adenomyosis. Overall, CLBR per patient was 36/57 (63.2%). After multivariate analysis, only being nulligravida (P=0.002) remained an independent negative predictive factor of the live birth rate. Previous surgery did not impact reproductive outcomes.

CONCLUSION

This study suggests that oocyte donation appears to be a viable option to optimize the live birth rate in women with endometriosis-related infertility and recurrent IVF failures.

IVF/ICSI Outcomes After a Freeze-All Strategy: an Observational Cohort Study

In order to inform patients undergoing ART regarding their chances for motherhood, it seems useful to describe "freeze all" outcomes according to the different potential indications. The goal of this study was to examine the impact of a "freeze-all approach" on the cumulative live birth rate (cLBR) according to the indication. It is a cohort study including women who had undergone ovarian stimulation (OS) using an antagonist protocol with GnRH agonist triggering between 09.2016 and 09.2018 followed by a freeze-all cycle of blastocyst embryos. The ART outcomes were compared between the two main indications of the freeze-all strategy which were in our cohort: risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) and endometriosis. The ART outcomes were also described for the others indications (inadequate endometrium and/or premature progesterone elevation at trigger day, two or more previous ART failures, and autoimmune disease and/or a high risk of thromboembolic disease (AI and/or TE risk)). In total, 658 women were included. The cLBR in the total population was 37.7% (248/658). The cLBR was significantly higher in the "OHSS risk" group (133/281, 47.3%) than in the "endometriosis" group (69/190, 36.3%) (p = 0.017). No significant differences were noted regarding perinatal outcomes, except a significantly higher risk of placenta praevia (PP) observed in the "endometriosis" group (10.1%) (p = 0.002). The "freeze-all approach" yielded good results in terms of the cLBR and especially in case of OHSS risk. These data should be taken into account when informing patients about the ART strategy and their chances of motherhood.

Review of Endometrial Receptivity Array: A Personalized Approach to Embryo Transfer and Its Clinical Applications

Successful outcomes of in vitro fertilization (IVF) rely on both the formation of a chromosomally normal embryo and its implantation in a receptive endometrium. Pre-implantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) has been widely accepted as a tool to assess the viability of an embryo. In 2011, the endometrial receptivity array (ERA) was first published as a tool to determine when the endometrium is most receptive to an embryo, commonly referred to as the "window of implantation" (WOI). The ERA uses molecular arrays to assess proliferation and differentiation in the endometrium and screens for inflammatory markers. Unlike PGT-A, there has been dissent within the field concerning the efficacy of the ERA. Many studies that contest the success of the ERA found that it did not improve pregnancy outcomes in patients with an already-good prognosis. Alternatively, studies that utilized the ERA in patients with repeated implantation failure (RIF) and transfer of known euploid embryos demonstrated improved outcomes. This review aims to describe the ERA as a novel technique, review the various settings that the ERA may be used in, such as natural frozen embryo transfer (nFET) and hormone replacement therapy frozen embryo transfer (HRT-FET), and provide a summary of the recent clinical data for embryo transfers in patients with RIF utilizing the ERA.

Impact of adenomyosis and endometriosis on IVF/ICSI pregnancy outcome in patients undergoing gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist treatment and frozen embryo transfer

Although numerous studies have attempted to establish the relationship between adenomyosis and infertility, no consensus has emerged. Our aim was to investigate whether adenomyosis and endometriosis affected IVF outcomes in our patients. This was a retrospective study of 1720 patients from January 2016 to December 2019. In total, 1389 cycles were included: 229 cycles in the endometriosis group (group E), 89 cycles in the adenomyosis group (group A), 69 cycles in the endometriosis and adenomyosis group (group EA), and 1002 cycles in the control group (group C). Most patients in groups A and EA received GnRH agonist treatment before FET. The 1st FET live birth rates (LBR) were 39.3%, 32.1%, 25% and 48.1% in groups E, A, EA, and C. The miscarriage rates were 19.9%, 34.7%, 39%, and 17.6%. The per retrieval cycle cumulative live birth rates (cLBRs) in patients < 38 y/o were 56.4%, 58.1%, 44.8%, and 63%. The per retrieval cycle cLBRs in patients ≥ 38 y/o were 25%, 9.8%, 17.2%, and 29.5%. Among groups A and EA, LBRs were 25.58% and 18.89% in patients with a ≥ sevenfold decrease and a < sevenfold decrease in CA-125 level, respectively, after GnRH agonist treatment. Endometriosis was not associated with a poorer pregnancy outcome. Patients with adenomyosis with/without endometriosis had higher miscarriage rates, lower LBRs, and lower cLBRs, especially in patients aged ≥ 38 years, even after GnRH agonist treatment before FET cycles. Patients who have a greater than sevenfold decrease in CA-125 level after GnRH agonist treatment might have better clinical pregnancy outcomes.

Supplementary dydrogesterone is beneficial as luteal phase support in artificial frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycles compared to micronized progesterone alone

Introduction

The number of frozen embryo transfers increased substantially in recent years. To increase the chances of implantation, endometrial receptivity and embryo competency must be synchronized. Maturation of the endometrium is facilitated by sequential administration of estrogens, followed by administration of progesterone prior to embryo transfer. The use of progesterone is crucial for pregnancy outcomes. This study compares the reproductive outcomes and tolerability of five different regimens of hormonal luteal phase support in artificial frozen embryo transfer cycles, with the objective of determining the best progesterone luteal phase support in this context.

Design

This is a single-center retrospective cohort study of all women undergoing frozen embryo transfers between 2013 and 2019. After sufficient endometrial thickness was achieved by estradiol, luteal phase support was initiated. The following five different progesterone applications were compared: 1) oral dydrogesterone (30 mg/day), 2) vaginal micronized progesterone gel (90 mg/day), 3) dydrogesterone (20 mg/day) plus micronized progesterone gel (90 mg/day) (dydrogesterone + micronized progesterone gel), 4) micronized progesterone capsules (600 mg/day), and (5) subcutaneous injection of progesterone 25 mg/day (subcutan-P4). The vaginal micronized progesterone gel application served as the reference group. Ultrasound was performed after 12-15 days of oral estrogen (≥4 mg/day) administration. If the endometrial thickness was ≥7 mm, luteal phase support was started, up to six days before frozen embryo transfer, depending on the development of the frozen embryo. The primary outcome was the clinical pregnancy rate. Secondary outcomes included live birth rate, ongoing pregnancy, and miscarriage and biochemical pregnancy rate.

Results

In total, 391 cycles were included in the study (median age of study participants 35 years; IQR 32-38 years, range 26-46 years). The proportions of blastocysts and single transferred embryos were lower in the micronized progesterone gel group. Differences among the five groups in other baseline characteristics were not significant. Multiple logistic regression analysis, adjusting for pre-defined covariates, showed that the clinical pregnancy rates were higher in the oral dydrogesterone only group (OR = 2.87, 95% CI 1.38-6.00, p=0.005) and in the dydrogesterone + micronized progesterone gel group (OR = 5.19, 95% CI 1.76-15.36, p = 0.003) compared to micronized progesterone gel alone. The live birth rate was higher in the oral dydrogesterone-only group (OR = 2.58; 95% CI 1.11-6.00; p=0.028) and showed no difference in the smaller dydrogesterone + micronized progesterone gel group (OR = 2.49; 95% CI 0.74-8.38; p=0.14) compared with the reference group.

Conclusion

The application of dydrogesterone in addition to micronized progesterone gel was associated with higher clinical pregnancy rate and live birth rate and then the use of micronized progesterone gel alone. DYD should be evaluated as a promising LPS option in FET Cycles.

Efficacy of long-term pituitary down-regulation pretreatment prior to in vitro fertilization in infertile patients with endometriosis: A meta-analysis

Controversial conclusions have been made in previous studies regarding the influence of ultra-long gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRH-a) in the reproductive outcomes of women with endometriosis who are undergoing in vitro fertilization/ intracytoplasmic sperm injection embryo transfer (IVF/ICSI-ET). An electronic search was conducted through PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Elsevier ScienceDirect and Medline from inception until 10 September 2022. Only randomized studies were included. After the selection process, seven articles were eventually included in the meta-analysis. The pooling of the results showed the adverse effect of ultra-long protocol in terms of live birth rate (risk ratio (RR) = 0.53, 95% confidence intervals (CI): 0.31-0.9, P=0.02) and fertilization rate (RR = 1.18, 95% CI: 1.02-1.36, P=0.02). There was no statistical significance between the ultra-long protocol and long protocol of the rest outcome Indicators. The findings of this meta-analysis suggest that ultra-long GnRH-a does not appear to improve the results of IVF/ICSI treatment outcomes in patients with endometriosis.

Investigating the impact of endometrial compaction on clinical pregnancy rate in artificial frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycles

Objective: The aim of our study was to evaluate sonographic endometrial thickness succeeding the estrogen-only stage and on the day when embryo transfer (ET) occurred in artificial frozen embryo transfer (FET) cycles to delve into the effect of endometrial compaction (EC) on clinical pregnancy rate (CPR). Patients and Methods: In the first group endometrial thickness diminished when ET occurred when compared to the end of the estrogen-only phase (n:37). Endometrial thickness increased/did not alter for the second group (n:70). Demographic characteristics were recorded and the following were studied: in vitro fertilization (IVF) treatment indications, hormone levels, total antral follicle count, duration of infertility, embryo quality, embryo-fundus distance, endometrial thickness at the end of estrogen-only phase and on ET day, luteal support, CPR. Results: No significant difference occurred in CPRs (n:107). ET, on day 5 was higher in the first group (p

Implantation Failure in Endometriosis Patients: Etiopathogenesis

Embryo implantation requires adequate dialogue between a good quality embryo and a receptive endometrium. This implantation is still considered as the black box of reproductive medicine. Endometriosis is a highly prevalent chronic inflammatory disease, concerning about 10% of women of reproductive age and is one of the major causes of female infertility. The mechanisms involved in endometriosis-related infertility, an event not yet completely understood, are multifactorial and include anatomical changes, reduction in ovarian reserve, endocrine abnormalities, genetic profile, immunity markers, inflammatory mediators, or altered endometrial receptivity. In this article, we will focus on the impact of endometriosis on embryo quality and on endometrial receptivity. Results: Poor oocyte and embryo quality seem to promote a lower pregnancy rate, more than the endometrium itself in women with endometriosis. Other studies report the contrary. In addition, hormonal imbalance observed in the endometrium could also alter the embryo implantation. Conclusions: Controversial results in the literature add difficulties to the understanding of the mechanisms that lead to embryo implantation disorders. Furthermore, either oocyte/embryo impairment, altered endometrium, or both may cause impaired implantation. New prospective, randomized, and controlled studies are necessary to determine the origin of the defects that make conception more difficult in the case of endometriosis and adenomyosis.

Infertility workup: identifying endometriosis

Endometriosis was classically diagnosed during diagnostic laparoscopies, which used to be routinely performed up until a decade ago or so. This practice fitted with the long-held belief that surgery was the gold standard for diagnosing endometriosis. Today, the abandon of routine diagnostic laparoscopies-in favor of assisted reproductive technology-first therapeutic approaches-has created a void for diagnosing endometriosis. Modern-day imaging techniques-ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging-when used with a systematic approach have offered a reliable replacement option for diagnosing endometriosis. In infertility, endometriosis should be identified or excluded on the basis of past history or confirmation or exclusion suspicion on the basis of history and/or physical examination.

Association of embryo transfer type with infertility in endometriosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

The study aims to evaluate whether frozen embryo transfer can restore optimal receptivity leading to better assisted reproductive technology outcomes in women with endometriosis.

METHODS

This systematic review and meta-analysis, conducted from January 10, 2021 to July 1, 2021, searched the Cochrane Library, PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, OVID, and Clinicaltrials.gov databases from inception to January 10, 2021. The search strategy combined search terms as follows: ("endometriosis" OR "deep endometriosis" OR "endometrioma") AND ("frozen-thawed embryo transfer" OR "frozen embryo transfer" OR "freeze-all strategy") AND ("pregnancy outcome" OR "live birth rate" OR "clinical pregnancy rate" OR "miscarriage rate"). No publication time or language limits were set during the searches. In addition, references of the related articles were searched by hand. Patients were included if they had a history of endometriosis and had received fresh or frozen embryo transfer. Only the first transfer cycle was included. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used to express outcomes, and data synthesis was conducted using RevMan, version 5.4 software.

RESULTS

A total of six studies with moderate methodologic quality were retrieved in the meta-analysis. The studies included 3010 women with endometriosis who wanted to conceive; 1777 (59.0%) had frozen embryo transfer, and 1233 (41.0%) had fresh embryo transfer. There was a significantly higher frequency of live births in the frozen embryo group than in the fresh embryo group (OR, 1.53; 95% CI, 1.13-2.08; P = .007). Despite a similar clinical pregnancy rate in the two groups (OR, 1.26; 95% CI, 0.95-1.69; P = .11), the difference in miscarriage rate was significant (OR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.50-0.97; P = .03). Evidence quality was considered moderate.

CONCLUSION

Cryopreserved embryo transfer has resulted in preferable reproduction outcomes when compared with fresh embryo transfer in patients with endometriosis, but the evidence is not yet abundant. More strictly designed research is needed to evaluate whether frozen embryo transfer leads to better reproductive outcomes in women with endometriosis compared with those receiving fresh embryo transfer.

REGISTRATION NUMBER

PROSPERO CRD42021248313.

The Mechanism Exploration of Follicular Fluids on Granulose Cell Apoptosis in Endometriosis-Associated Infertility

Objective

To explore the mechanisms of follicular fluids (FFs) on granulose cell (GC) apoptosis in endometriosis-associated infertility.

Materials and Methods

60 infertile women were enrolled. The FFs from 30 endometriosis-associated infertility (EI) patients were collected and processed by ELISA hormone assay and proteomic profiling. The ovary GCs collected from 30 tubal-associated infertility (TI) patients were cultured in follicular fluids of endometriosis-associated infertility patients (EI-FFs), and the apoptosis mechanisms were explored by flow cytometry assay, real-time PCR, Western blotting, and protein-protein interaction (PPI) network analysis.

Results

Our results showed that the expression of 22 specific proteins was significantly different in the FFs from EI and TI patients, and the level of testosterone and anti-Müllerian hormone was not obviously different between the two groups. EI-FFs could accelerate the apoptosis process of granulose cells of tubal-associated infertility patients (TI-GCs) by regulating the expression of 5 apoptosis-related proteins including BCL2, BAX, CASP3, CASP9, and TP53. The correlation of these 22 specific proteins and 5 apoptosis-related proteins was analyzed by PPI, and 5 protein biomarkers (INS, CXCL10, ICAM1, WIF1, and TNFRSF13C) and 5 signaling pathways (cytokine-cytokine receptor interaction, apoptosis, regulation of actin cytoskeleton, MAPK, and p53 signaling pathway) were predicted.

Conclusion

This research clarified the effect and explored the mechanisms of EI-FFs on the apoptosis of TI-GCs and indicated the protein biomarkers and signaling pathways for further study.

Genetic diagnosis, sperm phenotype and ICSI outcome in case of severe asthenozoospermia with multiple morphological abnormalities of the flagellum

STUDY QUESTION

Are ICSI outcomes impaired in cases of severe asthenozoospermia with multiple morphological abnormalities of the flagellum (MMAF phenotype)?

SUMMARY ANSWER

Despite occasional technical difficulties, ICSI outcomes for couples with MMAF do not differ from those of other couples requiring ICSI, irrespective of the genetic defect.

WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY

Severe asthenozoospermia, especially when associated with the MMAF phenotype, results in male infertility. Recent findings have confirmed that a genetic aetiology is frequently responsible for this phenotype. In such situations, pregnancies can be achieved using ICSI. However, few studies to date have provided detailed analyses regarding the flagellar ultrastructural defects underlying this phenotype, its genetic aetiologies, and the results of ICSI in such cases of male infertility.

STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION

We performed a retrospective study of 25 infertile men exhibiting severe asthenozoospermia associated with the MMAF phenotype identified through standard semen analysis. They were recruited at an academic centre for assisted reproduction in Paris (France) between 2009 and 2017. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and whole exome sequencing (WES) were performed in order to determine the sperm ultrastructural phenotype and the causal mutations, respectively. Finally 20 couples with MMAF were treated by assisted reproductive technologies based on ICSI.

PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS

Patients with MMAF were recruited based on reduced sperm progressive motility and increased frequencies of absent, short, coiled or irregular flagella compared with those in sperm from fertile control men. A quantitative analysis of the several ultrastructural defects was performed for the MMAF patients and for fertile men. The ICSI results obtained for 20 couples with MMAF were compared to those of 378 men with oligoasthenoteratozoospermia but no MMAF as an ICSI control group.

MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE

TEM analysis and categorisation of the flagellar anomalies found in these patients provided important information regarding the structural defects underlying asthenozoospermia and sperm tail abnormalities. In particular, the absence of the central pair of axonemal microtubules was the predominant anomaly observed more frequently than in control sperm (P < 0.01). Exome sequencing, performed for 24 of the 25 patients, identified homozygous or compound heterozygous pathogenic mutations in CFAP43, CFAP44, CFAP69, DNAH1, DNAH8, AK7, TTC29 and MAATS1 in 13 patients (54.2%) (11 affecting MMAF genes and 2 affecting primary ciliary dyskinesia (PCD)-associated genes). A total of 40 ICSI cycles were undertaken for 20 MMAF couples, including 13 cycles (for 5 couples) where a hypo-osmotic swelling (HOS) test was required due to absolute asthenozoospermia. The fertilisation rate was not statistically different between the MMAF (65.7%) and the non-MMAF (66.0%) couples and it did not differ according to the genotype or the flagellar phenotype of the subjects or use of the HOS test. The clinical pregnancy rate per embryo transfer did not differ significantly between the MMAF (23.3%) and the non-MMAF (37.1%) groups. To date, 7 of the 20 MMAF couples have achieved a live birth from the ICSI attempts, with 11 babies born without any birth defects.

LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION

The ICSI procedure outcomes were assessed retrospectively on a small number of affected subjects and should be confirmed on a larger cohort. Moreover, TEM analysis could not be performed for all patients due to low sperm concentrations, and WES results are not yet available for all of the included men.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS

An early and extensive phenotypic and genetic investigation should be considered for all men requiring ICSI for severe asthenozoospermia. Although our study did not reveal any adverse ICSI outcomes associated with MMAF, we cannot rule out that some rare genetic causes could result in low fertilisation or pregnancy rates.

STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S)

No external funding was used for this study and there are no competing interests.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

N/A.

Fertility preservation for patients affected by endometriosis should ideally be carried out before surgery

RESEARCH QUESTION

What prognostic factors relate to a high oocyte yield in fertility preservation for women affected by endometriosis?

DESIGN

Observational cohort study conducted in a tertiary care university hospital between April 2015 and January 2019. Women who had undergone fertility preservation with ovarian stimulation for oocytes and embryo vitrification for endometriosis were included. Prognostic factors associated with the number of oocytes retrieved after the first ovarian stimulation were analysed.

RESULTS

A total of 146 women who had undergone 258 ovarian stimulation cycles were included; 82 (56.2%) had undergone more than one ovarian stimulation cycle; 72.6% had at least one endometrioma lesion; and 36.3% had previously undergone surgery for endometriosis. After adjustment by multiple linear regression, the factors that significantly reduced the number of oocytes retrieved were previous history of surgery for ovarian endometriosis (coefficient -1.08; 95% CI -2.02 to -0.15; P = 0.024); women's age (-0.21; 95% CI -0.41 to -0.01; P = 0.039); and total dose of gonadotrophin used (-0.01; 95% CI -0.01 to -0.00; P = 0.047). Anti-Müllerian hormone serum level and gravidity positively correlated with an increase in the number of oocytes retrieved (1.65; 95% CI 1.13 to 2.17; P < 0.001 and 3.30; 95% CI 0.91 to 5.68; P = 0.007, respectively) after the first ovarian stimulation cycle.

CONCLUSION

A history of surgery for ovarian endometriosis was associated with significantly lower oocyte yields. Fertility preservation should be integrated into endometriosis management. Fertility preservation should ideally be made available to the patient before surgery.

ART Outcomes After Hysteroscopic Proximal Tubal Occlusion Versus Laparoscopic Salpingectomy for Hydrosalpinx Management in Endometriosis Patients

The objective of this paper is to compare assisted reproductive technology (ART) cumulative live birth rates after hysteroscopic proximal tubal occlusion and laparoscopic salpingectomy in endometriosis patients, for management of hydrosalpinx. This is an observational cohort study at a university hospital, including all endometriosis patients with hydrosalpinges undergoing ART, between January 2013 and December 2018. The patients underwent either laparoscopic salpingectomy or hysteroscopic proximal tubal occlusion with Essure® when laparoscopy was not an option (extensive pelvic adhesions at exploratory laparoscopy or a history of multiple abdominal surgeries with frozen pelvis). The diagnosis of endometriosis was based on published imaging criteria using transvaginal sonography (TVUS) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Endometriosis patients with hydrosalpinges diagnosed by hysterosalpingography and/or TVUS and/or MRI were included. The primary outcome was the cumulative live birth rate. A total of 104 patients were included in the study; 74 underwent laparoscopic salpingectomy and 30 underwent proximal tubal occlusion with Essure®. The Essure® group had longer infertility durations (58.9 ± 30.0 months vs. 39.5 ± 19.1 months, p = 0.002) and a higher incidence of associated adenomyosis (76.7% vs. 39.1%, p < 0.001) than the salpingectomy group. The cumulative live birth rate was 56.6% after 44 ART cycles in the Essure® group and 40.5% after 99 ART cycles in the salpingectomy group (p = 0.13). In a population of endometriosis patients undergoing ART, women treated by Essure® for management of hydrosalpinx have similar cumulative live birth rates as women treated by laparoscopic salpingectomy.

Preparation of the Endometrium for Frozen Embryo Transfer: A Systematic Review

Despite the worldwide increase in frozen embryo transfer, the search for the best protocol to prime endometrium continues. Well-designed trials comparing various frozen embryo transfer protocols in terms of live birth rates, maternal, obstetric and neonatal outcome are urgently required. Currently, low-quality evidence indicates that, natural cycle, either true natural cycle or modified natural cycle, is superior to hormone replacement treatment protocol. Regarding warmed blastocyst transfer and frozen embryo transfer timing, the evidence suggests the 6th day of progesterone start, LH surge+6 day and hCG+7 day in hormone replacement treatment, true natural cycle and modified natural cycle protocols, respectively. Time corrections, due to inter-personal differences in the window of implantation or day of vitrification (day 5 or 6), should be explored further. Recently available evidence clearly indicates that, in hormone replacement treatment and natural cycles, there might be marked inter-personal variation in serum progesterone levels with an impact on reproductive outcomes, despite the use of the same dose and route of progesterone administration. The place of progesterone rescue protocols in patients with low serum progesterone levels one day prior to warmed blastocyst transfer in hormone replacement treatment and natural cycles is likely to be intensively explored in near future.

Frozen vs. fresh cycles IVF outcomes: retrospective study from an Indonesian IVF centre

Objective

To compare the live birth rates (LBR) and neonatal outcomes of frozen cycle in vitro fertilization (IVF) with fresh cycle IVF in the Indonesian population.

Results

This was retrospective study using secondary data of IVF patients at a private fertility centre. Study recruitment was between 3/8/2018 and 31/12/2019. Total sampling included all patients undergoing oocyte retrieval and embryo transfer within recruitment period. Patients undergoing fresh IVF cycles and frozen IVF cycles were compared. 351 patients were recruited: 68.1% (239/351) underwent fresh cycles and 31.9% (112/351) frozen cycles. AMH was significantly higher in frozen cycle group (p = 0.04). Ovulatory disorder was significantly higher in frozen cycle group (p = 0.001). Among patients aged ≤ 30, fresh cycle group had significantly higher LBR (p = 0.02). Among those with ovulatory disorder, LBR was significantly higher with frozen cycle. No significant LBR difference was noted with other infertility causes. When stratified according to pregnancy order, frozen cycle patients had significantly higher birth lengths (p = 0.03) but not length of gestation nor neonatal birthweights. There was no significant difference in the proportion of biochemical pregnancy resulting in LBR (p = 0.08). To conclude, frozen cycle provided higher LBR among patients with ovulatory disorder but fresh cycle was beneficial among patients aged ≤ 30.

Assisted reproductive technology for women with endometriosis, a clinically oriented review

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To discuss optimal management of an assisted reproductive technology (ART) cycle in women with endometriosis.

RECENT FINDINGS

New studies involving euploid embryo transfers provide more insight on the etiology of endometriosis-associated infertility. Oocyte competence to reach live birth seems unlikely to be affected by the disease. Routine medical or surgical treatment prior to an ART cycle does not appear beneficial. Short gonadotropin releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist or progestin primed ovarian stimulation protocols seem to be proper first choices, depending on the intention for a fresh embryo transfer. Low-quality evidence supports frozen thawed over fresh embryo transfer. Ovarian stimulation for ART does not seem to be associated with symptom progression or recurrence.

SUMMARY

How endometriosis affects fertility is still unclear, but ART is an effective pragmatic treatment. Each woman with endometriosis must be assessed with a holistic approach, and in the absence of an indication for otherwise, ART cycles can be kept simple with patient-friendly protocols. Whether a frozen embryo transfer is better than a fresh one should be investigated.

Endometrial causes of recurrent pregnancy losses: endometriosis, adenomyosis, and chronic endometritis

Chronic inflammatory processes affecting the endometrium, as encountered in endometriosis, adenomyosis, and chronic endometritis, alter endometrial receptivity. These disorders are associated with early pregnancy losses and possibly recurrent pregnancy losses (RPL). In the cases of endometriosis, other factors associated with the disease also are susceptible of causing miscarriages and possibly RPL, such as an impact of intrapelvic inflammatory processes affecting the oocyte and embryo in case of natural conception. Conversely these latter effects obviously are bypassed in case of assisted reproductive technology. Chronic inflammation of the endometrium in the condition known as chronic endometritis also causes early pregnancy losses and RPL with beneficial effects achieved when specific treatment is undertaken.

Early Pregnancy Outcomes in Fresh Versus Deferred Embryo Transfer Cycles for Endometriosis-Associated Infertility: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Given the estrogen-dependence associated with endometriosis, hyper-stimulation associated with assisted reproduction treatment may exacerbate the disease process and adversely affect endometrial receptivity and subsequent implantation. In this way, a freeze-all deferred embryo transfer (ET) approach may benefit patients with endometriosis, although controversy exists regarding the mechanism of endometriosis-associated infertility and benefits of deferred ET on endometrial receptivity. Hence, the purpose of this study was to compare in vitro fertilization (IVF) outcomes in women with endometriosis, diagnosed by histology, undergoing fresh versus deferred-ET after elective cryopreservation. Of the 728 women included, no significant differences were observed in baseline patient characteristics and response to gonadotrophin stimulation between fresh and deferred ET groups. Furthermore, no significant differences in implantation rate (49.7 vs. 49.9%, p = 0.73), clinical pregnancy rate (40.9 vs. 39.9%, p = 0.49), and miscarriage rate (9.4 vs. 9.9%, p = 0.63) were observed between fresh and deferred ET groups, respectively. Hence, contrary to previous studies, our results suggest that a deferred ET “freeze-all” IVF strategy does not improve early pregnancy outcomes among women with endometriosis. However, prospective studies are required to validate these findings and further insight into the etiology and pathogenesis of endometriosis-associated infertility are necessary to optimize IVF protocols in this population.

The freeze-all strategy after IVF: which indications?

The freeze-all strategy is gaining popularity worldwide as an alternative to the conventional fresh embryo transfer. It consists of cryopreservation of the entire embryo cohort and the embryo transfer in a subsequent cycle that takes place separately from ovarian stimulation. The freeze-all strategy was initially a 'rescue' strategy for women at high risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome; however, this approach has been extended to other indications as a scheduled strategy to improve implantation rates. This assumes that ovarian stimulation can alter endometrial receptivity in fresh cycles owing to the effect of supraphysiological levels of steroids on endometrial maturation. The procedure, however, has not been associated with increased live birth rates in all infertile couples, and concerns have been raised about the occurrence of several adverse perinatal outcomes. It is, therefore, crucial to identify in which subgroups of patients a freeze-all strategy could be beneficial. The aim of this review is to summarize current scientific research in this field to highlight potential indications for this strategy and to guide clinicians in their daily practice.

A New Concept in Minimally Invasive Embryo Transfer

Considerable variation in embryo transfer (ET) catheter types, diverging opinions on their quality and functionality, complications following the insertion of catheters, low efficiency of the application of ET methods in humans, and their widely varying efficiency in animals demonstrate the need to improve ET methods and to look for new types of catheters. Such an opportunity is offered by the introduction of catheters made of new-generation biomaterials. This study was aimed to introduce a new generation of biomaterials into reproductive biotechnology. New-generation materials were compared with materials that have been used for many years, and the functionality of newly produced catheters was compared in vivo. Five types of biomaterials were tested: polycaprolactone (PCL), dibutyryl chitin (DBC), polypropylene (PP), polyethylene (PE) and polylactide (PLA). The study was carried out in two stages. Firstly, the basic utility parameters such as geometric stability, surface structure and catheter resistance were evaluated. Subsequently, the biocompatibility of selected biomaterials in embryo cultures was examined, and the development potential of the obtained blastocysts was evaluated. In the second stage, in vivo with live animals, the biomaterials were tested for biocompatibility and the obtained catheters were examined for their ET functionality. Efficiency with the use of the newly produced catheters was determined, the quality of the blastocysts obtained after embryo culture in the uterus was assessed, and oviducts were subjected to histopathological examination after embryo transfer. Of the tested biomaterials, only polyethylene (PE) showed adequate biological and material properties and proved suitable for production of ET catheters.

Frozen blastocyst transfer improves the chance of live birth in women with endometrioma

Purpose: The existing literature is scarce regarding outcomes of fresh vs frozen embryo blastocyst transfers in women with endometrioma. The goal of the study was to compare outcomes between fresh and frozen blastocyst transfers (fresh-BT vs. frozen-BT) in endometrioma-affected women. Materials and methods: This study included 315 endometrioma-affected women aged between 20 and 39 years who underwent blastocyst transfer. Primary outcome was live birth rate (an alive birth after 24 completed weeks gestation). Results: The study groups did not differ in terms of patient characteristics and treatment variables. The live birth rate was 40.7% in fresh-BT group and 56.1% in frozen-BT group (OR:1.86, 95% CI:1.18-2.92 p = .007). The approach of frozen embryo transfer was an independent factor of live birth (adjusted OR:1.83, 95% CI:1.16-2.90, p = .009). Conclusion: The approach of frozen blastocyst transfer increases the chance of live birth in endometrioma-affected patients compared with fresh blastocyst transfer. Thus, a frozen embryo transfer may be the choice of strategy in these patients.

Endometrioma and reproductive issues: a well-informed patient may be the driver for change

Endometriosis affects a great proportion of women during their reproductive years and may impair female fertility in several ways. Ovarian endometrioma (OE) is the most frequent phenotype and growing evidence suggest an endometrioma-mediated damage to the ovary, ovarian reserve and oocyte quality. Traditionally, surgery has been the first-line treatment in cases of OE. Great advances in assisted reproduction and fertility preservation techniques opened new possibilities towards a more conservative approach. Herein we discuss multiple mechanisms responsible for the deterioration of the reproductive capacity in cases of OE as well as the pros and cons of different treatment options. The management of endometrioma-related subfertility remains controversial and it will depend on patient's intentions and priorities. In the "internet era" patients tend to be hyper-informed and more participative, but they are often misguided and misinformed. Thus, doctors should be able to convert these individuals into well-informed patients in order to facilitate the process of shared decision making, which is extremely relevant in the context of OEs.

Which is better for mothers and babies: fresh or frozen-thawed blastocyst transfer?

BACKGROUND

In recent years, there have been many reports on the pregnancy outcomes of fresh blastocyst transfer (BT) and frozen-thawed BT, but the conclusions are controversial and incomplete. To compare the pregnancy outcomes, maternal complications and neonatal outcomes of fresh and frozen-thawed BT in the context of in vitro fertilization or intracytoplasmic sperm injection (IVF/ICSI) cycles, we conducted a meta-analysis.

METHODS

A meta-analysis was conducted by searching the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases through May 2020. Data were extracted independently by two authors.

RESULTS

Fifty-four studies, including 12 randomized controlled trials (RCTs), met the inclusion criteria. Fresh BT was associated with a lower implantation rate, pregnancy rate, ongoing pregnancy rate, and clinical pregnancy rate and higher ectopic pregnancy rate than frozen-thawed BT according to the results of the RCTs. The risks of moderate or severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome, placental abruption, placenta previa and preterm delivery were higher for fresh BT than for frozen-thawed BT. The risk of pregnancy-induced hypertension and pre-eclampsia was lower for fresh BT; however, no significant differences in risks for gestational diabetes mellitus and preterm rupture of membrane were found between the two groups. Compared with frozen-thawed BT, fresh BT appears to be associated with small for gestational age and low birth weight. No differences in the incidences of neonatal mortality or neonatal malformation were observed between fresh and frozen-thawed BT.

CONCLUSIONS

At present there is an overall slight preponderance of risks in fresh cycles against frozen, however individualization is required and current knowledge does not permit to address a defintive response.

Endometriosis does not impact live-birth rates in frozen embryo transfers of euploid blastocysts

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether subfertility in patients with endometriosis is due to impaired endometrial receptivity by comparing pregnancy and live-birth outcomes in women with endometriosis versus two control groups without suspected endometrial factors: noninfertile patients who underwent assisted reproduction to test embryos for a single-gene disorder and couples with isolated male factor infertility.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort.

SETTING

Multicenter private practice.

PATIENT(S)

All patients aged 24 to 44 years undergoing euploid frozen blastocysts transfer from January 2016 through March 2018.

INTERVENTION(S)

None.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

Live birth, clinical pregnancies, pregnancy losses, and aneuploid rates in preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy cycles.

RESULT(S)

The analysis included 459 euploid frozen embryo transfer cycles among 328 unique patients. There were no differences in clinical pregnancy, pregnancy loss, or live-birth rates in patients with endometriosis compared with both control groups. The aneuploidy rates were lowest in the preimplantation genetic testing for monogenic disorders cohort, and the endometriosis patients had aneuploidy rates similar to those of the male factor infertility patients.

CONCLUSION(S)

It is unclear whether endometriosis primarily affects in vitro fertilization outcomes via oocyte quality or the endometrium. By controlling for embryo quality using euploid frozen embryo transfer cycles, we found no difference in pregnancy outcomes in patients with endometriosis compared with patients undergoing treatment for male factor infertility and noninfertile patients.

Should we still perform fresh embryo transfers in ART?

An increasing number of researchers have alluded to the potential benefit of deferring the transfer of embryos produced during assisted reproductive technologies (ARTs) away from ovarian stimulation, using cryopreservation to enable this. The scientific evidence that may justify this recent trend in the use of the so-called 'freeze-all strategy' includes early, mostly small randomised controlled trials that have demonstrated an increase in live birth rates after elective embryo cryopreservation in certain patient populations, as well as evidence from cohort studies and retrospective analyses. What are the risks and benefits of freeze-all strategies in ART, who are the patients in whom it is likely to be advantageous, and does the current evidence allow us to identify situations when deciding that a fresh embryo transfer would be counter-productive? ART professionals are often faced with challenging clinical decisions regarding the best course of treatment for their patient. The purpose of this opinion paper is to provide a clinical guide for whether to perform a fresh embryo transfer or to opt for freezing all embryos in specific situations.

Impaired implantation in endometriosis compared with couples with male subfertility after transfer of equal quality embryos: a matched cohort study

RESEARCH QUESTION

Is implantation impaired in patients with endometriosis undergoing IVF and intracytoplasmatic sperm injection (ICSI) cycles?

DESIGN

A retrospective matched cohort study was carried out on IVF/ICSI cycles with fresh single embryo transfer at the Department of Assisted Reproductive Medicine, Ghent University Hospital, Belgium, between July 2015 and August 2017 (n = 1053). A total of 118 endometriosis cases were matched 1:1 to 118 couples diagnosed with male subfertility and stratified by embryo quality (identical ALPHA grading categories), female age (±1 year) and parity (±1 delivery). Transvaginal ultrasound, magnetic resonance imaging or laparoscopy was used to diagnosed endometriosis, and the revised American Society for Reproductive Medicine score was used to classify the endometriosis into grade I/II versus grade III/IV. Male subfertility was defined in accordance with World Health Organization criteria (fifth edition).

RESULTS

Compared with endometriosis cases, control couples with male subfertility had significantly higher rates of positive HCG test on day 16 (P = 0.047, OR 2.077, CI 1.009 to 4.276), ongoing implantation (defined as a positive fetal heart rate on transvaginal ultrasound at a gestational age of at least 6.5-7 weeks) (P = 0.038, OR 2.265, CI 1.048 to 4.893), ongoing pregnancy (defined by a vital pregnancy at 11 weeks) (P = 0.046, OR 2.292, CI 1.016 to 5.173) and live birth (P = 0.043, OR 2.502, CI 1.029 to 6.087).

CONCLUSIONS

After matching for embryo quality, woman's age and parity, rates of positive HCG tests, ongoing implantation, ongoing pregnancy and live birth were more than twice as high in the control group compared with the endometriosis group.

Risk of small for gestational age is reduced after frozen compared with fresh embryo transfer in endometriosis

RESEARCH QUESTION

What are the perinatal outcomes and especially the risk of small for gestational age (SGA) babies born after frozen versus fresh embryo transfer in mothers affected by endometriosis undergoing treatment with assisted reproductive technology (ART)?

DESIGN

A cohort study conducted between November 2012 and October 2017, in which infertile women with endometriosis undergoing ART and achieving singleton pregnancies that lasted beyond 12 weeks of gestation were included. Pregnancies obtained after a frozen embryo transfer (FET) were compared with those obtained after a fresh embryo transfer. A total of 339 pregnant women were included: 112 patients in the fresh embryo transfer group and 227 in the FET group. The main outcome was the rate of SGA. Secondary analyses were performed for adverse pregnancy outcomes and perinatal complications.

RESULTS

Of the included women, 109/112 (97.3%) and 222/227 (97.8%) delivered a live child after at least 24 weeks of gestation in the fresh and in the frozen embryo transfer groups, respectively (P = 0.53). The risk of SGA decreased after a FET compared with a fresh embryo transfer (odds ratio [OR] 0.49 [0.25-0.98], P = 0.04) after multivariable analysis. The mean birthweight and the gestational age at delivery were not significantly different between the two study groups. Other pregnancy and perinatal complications were not statistically different between the two study populations.

CONCLUSIONS

The present study of endometriosis-affected women found a significantly lower risk of SGA in patients undergoing frozen, mainly blastocyst, embryo transfer compared with patients undergoing fresh, mainly cleavage stage, embryo transfer.

Does Endometriosis Influence the Embryo Quality and/or Development? Insights from a Large Retrospective Matched Cohort Study

In vitro fertilization can be an effective tool to manage the endometriosis-associated infertility, which accounts for 10% of the strategy indications. Nevertheless, a negative effect of endometriosis on IVF outcomes has been suggested. The aim of this study was to evaluate the potential effect of endometriosis in the development of embryos at cleavege stage in assisted reproduction treatment cycles. A total of 429 cycles from women previously operated for moderate/severe endometriosis were compared with 851 cycles from non-affected women. Patients were matched by age, number of oocyte retrieved and study period. A total of 3818 embryos in cleavage stage have been analyzed retrospectively. Overall, no difference was found between women with and without endometriosis regarding the number of cleavage stage embryos obtained as well as the percentage of good/fair quality embryos. Excluding cycles in which no transfers were performed or where embryos were frozen in day three, no difference was observed for blastulation rate or the percentage of good/fair blastocysts obtained. Despite similar fertilization rate and number/quality of embryos, a reduction in ongoing pregnancy rate was observed in patients affected, possibly due to an altered endometrial receptivity or to the limited value of the conventional morphological evaluation of the embryo.

Assisted reproduction in endometriosis

Endometriosis - a disease causing pain and infertility - is encountered in nearly 50% of infertile women. While medical treatment is effective on pain and recurrence of symptoms after surgical excision, it is of no help for treating infertility for which the only options considered are surgery and ART. Surgery enhances the chances of conceiving naturally during the 12-18 ensuing months irrespective of the stage of the disease. Surgery however is of no help when ART is considered, as it does not improve outcome and can only harm the ovarian response to stimulation. Today therefore, ART is commonly the primary option to be considered in women whose infertility is associated with endometriosis and whose ovarian reserve is compromised and/or who are over 35 years of age. When, ART is envisioned it is best to opt for a segmented ART approach with agonist trigger, freeze all and deferred embryo transfer.

Fertility and Neonatal Outcomes of Freeze-All vs. Fresh Embryo Transfer in Women With Advanced Endometriosis

Background: Eutopic endometrium from women with endometriosis has functional changes in several aspects, which may largely account for the decrease in the quality of endometrial receptivity. It is of utmost importance to know whether freeze-all strategy can restore optimal receptivity in endometriotic women leading to the better ART outcomes. Methods: Retrospective study involved patients with advanced endometriosis undergoing first embryo transfer cycles during the period from March 2006 to March 2017 at a tertiary care center. After propensity score matching, there were 506 women in the freeze-all group and 255 women in fresh group. Our main outcomes included the rates of implantation, clinical pregnancy, and live birth. Subgroup analyses were performed after stratification by the number of oocytes retrieved and fertilization method. Neonatal outcomes included gestational age and birth weight z-score for singletons and multiple births. Results: In our matched cohort, the implantation, clinical pregnancy and live birth rates were statistically significantly higher in the freeze-all group compared with fresh transfer groups (34.4 vs. 25.5%, 51.8 vs. 38.8%, and 45.3 vs. 31.8%, all P < 0.001, respectively). A more beneficial effect of freeze-all cycles was found in patients who got more than 15 oocytes. Additionally, when ICSI insemination techniques were used to achieve fertilization, the advantage of freeze-all strategy was not obvious. Assessment of 382 babies showed no statistically significant difference in the mode of delivery, sex of live-born, gestational age, unadjusted median birth weight, and z-score between two study groups. Conclusion: Freeze-all strategy is an attractive option to improve the outcomes of ART for women with advanced endometriosis.

Endometriosis and ART: A prior history of surgery for OMA is associated with a poor ovarian response to hyperstimulation

Background

Many women whose fertility may have been impaired by endometriosis require assisted reproductive technology (ART) in order to become pregnant. However, the influence of ovarian endometriosis (OMA) on ovarian responsiveness to hyperstimulation has not been clearly established.

Objective

To evaluate the risk of a poor ovarian response (POR) to stimulation and ART outcomes in women with OMA.

Materials and methods

We conducted a large observational controlled matched cohort study in a tertiary care university hospital between 01/10/2012 and 31/12/2015. After matching by age and anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) levels, 201 infertile women afflicted with OMA (the OMA group) and 402 disease-free women (the control group) undergoing an ART procedure were included in the study. The main outcomes that we measured were a POR to hyperstimulation (i.e., ≤ 3 oocytes retrieved, or cancelled cycles), the clinical pregnancy rate, and the live birth rate.

All of the women with endometriosis underwent a pre-ART work-up, in order to obtain an accurate diagnosis and staging of their disease. An OMA diagnosis was based on published imaging criteria (obtained by transvaginal sonography or magnetic resonance imaging) or on histological analysis for patients with a prior history of endometriosis surgery. The statistical analyses were conducted using univariate and multivariate logistic regression models.

Results

The incidence of a POR to hyperstimulation was significantly higher for the OMA group than for the control group [62/201 (30.8%) versus 90/402 (22.3%), respectively; p = 0.02]. However, no significant differences were found between the OMA and the control group in terms of the clinical pregnancy rate [53/151 (35%) versus 134/324 (41.3%), respectively; p = 0.23] and the live birth rate [39/151 (25.8%) versus 99/324 (30.5%), respectively; p = 0.33]. By multivariate analysis, a prior history of surgery for OMA was found to be an independent factor associated with a POR to stimulation [OR = 2.1; 95% CI: 1.1–4.0], unlike OMA without a prior history of surgery [OR: 1.5; 95% CI: 0.9–2.2].

Conclusion

The presence of OMA during ART treatment increased the risk of a POR to hyperstimulation, although the live birth rate was not affected. Furthermore, having OMA and having previously undergone surgery for OMA was identified as an independent risk factor for a POR.