The influence of morphologic grading and COS protocol on the outcomes of Day 5 versus Day 6 single fresh blastocyst transfers: a retrospective analysis of clinical outcomes from one center experience

INTRODUCTION

The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether the blastocyst morphologic grading and the protocol of controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) would influence pregnancy outcomes, aiming to provide guidance when choosing blastocyst transfer.

METHODS

The clinical data of 612 patients who received single fresh blastocyst transfer for first cycle, as well as the data of 253 patients who had already delivered were analyzed retrospectively. The patients were divided into two groups according to blastocyst formation time (D5 or D6). The following subgroup analyses were performed: (i) the morphologic grading of blastocyst and (ii) the protocol of COS.

RESULTS

We observed that D5 single embryo transfer (SET) were associated with higher clinical pregnancy rate (CPR, 59.04% vs. 31.73%, P < 0.001) and live birth rate (LBR, 43.90% vs. 24.04%, P < 0.001) than D6 SET following fresh cycle. Patients in D5 group experienced more good blastocysts transfer (45.47%vs. 13.46%, P < 0.001) and less poor blastocysts transfer (9.64%vs. 45.19%, P < 0.001) than patients in D6 group. As to early stage and good quality blastocysts, the CPR and LBR were similar between D5 and D6 group. GnRH antagonist protocol had a demonstrable inferiority comparing with the early-follicular-phase long-acting GnRH-agonist long protocol (EFLL) or the mid-luteal-phase long-acting GnRH-agonist long protocol (MLLL) with regard to the CPR and LBR in D6-SET group.

CONCLUSIONS

The analysis found that ovarian reserve of patients in D6-SET group was comparatively worse than that of patients in D5-SET group and D6-SET patients represented a subgroup of infertility patients usually having relatively poor embryo quality. The results should be interpreted with caution as the very low numbers in the respective group limited the use of statistical tests and the real significance values.

Which is better for mothers and babies: fresh or frozen-thawed blastocyst transfer?

BACKGROUND

In recent years, there have been many reports on the pregnancy outcomes of fresh blastocyst transfer (BT) and frozen-thawed BT, but the conclusions are controversial and incomplete. To compare the pregnancy outcomes, maternal complications and neonatal outcomes of fresh and frozen-thawed BT in the context of in vitro fertilization or intracytoplasmic sperm injection (IVF/ICSI) cycles, we conducted a meta-analysis.

METHODS

A meta-analysis was conducted by searching the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases through May 2020. Data were extracted independently by two authors.

RESULTS

Fifty-four studies, including 12 randomized controlled trials (RCTs), met the inclusion criteria. Fresh BT was associated with a lower implantation rate, pregnancy rate, ongoing pregnancy rate, and clinical pregnancy rate and higher ectopic pregnancy rate than frozen-thawed BT according to the results of the RCTs. The risks of moderate or severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome, placental abruption, placenta previa and preterm delivery were higher for fresh BT than for frozen-thawed BT. The risk of pregnancy-induced hypertension and pre-eclampsia was lower for fresh BT; however, no significant differences in risks for gestational diabetes mellitus and preterm rupture of membrane were found between the two groups. Compared with frozen-thawed BT, fresh BT appears to be associated with small for gestational age and low birth weight. No differences in the incidences of neonatal mortality or neonatal malformation were observed between fresh and frozen-thawed BT.

CONCLUSIONS

At present there is an overall slight preponderance of risks in fresh cycles against frozen, however individualization is required and current knowledge does not permit to address a defintive response.