Contribution of excision repair cross-complementing group 1 genotypes to triple negative breast cancer risk

Racial differences in RAD51 expression are regulated by miRNA-214-5P and its inhibition synergizes with olaparib in triple-negative breast cancer

BACKGROUND

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) affects young women and is the most aggressive subtype of breast cancer (BC). TNBCs disproportionally affect women of African-American (AA) descent compared to other ethnicities. We have identified DNA repair gene RAD51 as a poor prognosis marker in TNBC and its posttranscriptional regulation through microRNAs (miRNAs). This study aims to delineate the mechanisms leading to RAD51 upregulation and develop novel therapeutic combinations to effectively treat TNBCs and reduce disparity in clinical outcomes.

METHODS

Analysis of TCGA data for BC cohorts using the UALCAN portal and PrognoScan identified the overexpression of RAD51 in TNBCs. miRNA sequencing identified significant downregulation of RAD51-targeting miRNAs miR-214-5P and miR-142-3P. RT-PCR assays were used to validate the levels of miRNAs and RAD51, and immunohistochemical and immunoblotting techniques were used similarly for RAD51 protein levels in TNBC tissues and cell lines. Luciferase assays were performed under the control of RAD51 3'-UTR to confirm that miR-214-5P regulates RAD51 expression. To examine the effect of miR-214-5P-mediated downregulation of RAD51 on homologous recombination (HR) in TNBC cells, Dr-GFP reporter assays were performed. To assess the levels of olaparib-induced DNA damage responses in miR-214-5P, transfected cells, immunoblots, and immunofluorescence assays were used. Furthermore, COMET assays were used to measure DNA lesions and colony assays were performed to assess the sensitivity of BRCA-proficient TNBC cells to olaparib.

RESULTS

In-silico analysis identified upregulation of RAD51 as a poor prognostic marker in TNBCs. miRNA-seq data showed significant downregulation of miR-214-5P and miR-142-3P in TNBC cell lines derived from AA women compared to Caucasian-American (CA) women. miR-214-5P mimics downregulated RAD51 expression and induces HR deficiency as measured by Dr-GFP assays in these cell lines. Based on these results, we designed a combination treatment of miR-214-5P and olaparib in HR-proficient AA TNBC cell lines using clonogenic survival assays. The combination of miR-214-5P and olaparib showed synergistic lethality compared to individual treatments in these cell lines.

CONCLUSIONS

Our studies identified a novel epigenetic regulation of RAD51 in TNBCs by miR-214-5P suggesting a novel combination therapies involving miR-214-5P and olaparib to treat HR-proficient TNBCs and to reduce racial disparity in therapeutic outcomes.

A radiosensitizer, gallotannin-rich extract from Bouea macrophylla seeds, inhibits radiation-induced epithelial-mesenchymal transition in breast cancer cells

Background

Radioresistance can pose a significant obstacle to the effective treatment of breast cancers. Epithelial–mesenchymal transition (EMT) is a critical step in the acquisition of stem cell traits and radioresistance. Here, we investigated whether Maprang seed extract (MPSE), a gallotannin-rich extract of seed from Bouea macrophylla Griffith, could inhibit the radiation-induced EMT process and enhance the radiosensitivity of breast cancer cells.

Methods

Breast cancer cells were pre-treated with MPSE before irradiation (IR), the radiosensitizing activity of MPSE was assessed using the colony formation assay. Radiation-induced EMT and stemness phenotype were identified using breast cancer stem cells (CSCs) marker (CD24^−/low/CD44⁺) and mammosphere formation assay. Cell motility was determined via the wound healing assay and transwell migration. Radiation-induced cell death was assessed via the apoptosis assay and SA-β-galactosidase staining for cellular senescence. CSCs- and EMT-related genes were confirmed by real-time PCR (qPCR) and Western blotting.

Results

Pre-treated with MPSE before irradiation could reduce the clonogenic activity and enhance radiosensitivity of breast cancer cell lines with sensitization enhancement ratios (SERs) of 2.33 and 1.35 for MCF7 and MDA-MB231cells, respectively. Pretreatment of breast cancer cells followed by IR resulted in an increased level of DNA damage maker (γ-H2A histone family member) and enhanced radiation-induced cell death. Irradiation induced EMT process, which displayed a significant EMT phenotype with a down-regulated epithelial marker E-cadherin and up-regulated mesenchymal marker vimentin in comparison with untreated breast cancer cells. Notably, we observed that pretreatment with MPSE attenuated the radiation-induced EMT process and decrease some stemness-like properties characterized by mammosphere formation and the CSC marker. Furthermore, pretreatment with MPSE attenuated the radiation-induced activation of the pro-survival pathway by decrease the expression of phosphorylation of ERK and AKT and sensitized breast cancer cells to radiation.

Conclusion

MPSE enhanced the radiosensitivity of breast cancer cells by enhancing IR-induced DNA damage and cell death, and attenuating the IR-induced EMT process and stemness phenotype via targeting survival pathways PI3K/AKT and MAPK in irradiated breast cancer cells. Our findings describe a novel strategy for increasing the efficacy of radiotherapy for breast cancer patients using a safer and low-cost natural product, MPSE.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12906-021-03363-6.

Association of Interleukin-4 Polymorphisms With Breast Cancer in Taiwan

BACKGROUND/AIM

The present study aimed at evaluating the contribution of IL-4 promoter T-1099G (rs2243248), C-589T (rs2243250), C-33T (rs2070874) genotypes to the risk of breast cancer in Taiwanese.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 1232 breast cancer patients and 1232 age-matched controls were genotyped by polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism (PCR-RFLP) methodology.

RESULTS

Genotypic frequencies of IL-4 rs2243248, rs2243250 and rs2070874 were not differentially distributed between case and control groups. Consistently, there was no difference in the distribution of allelic frequencies among patients and controls.

CONCLUSION

IL-4 rs2243248, rs2243250 and rs2070874 do not confer breast cancer susceptibility in Taiwanese.

Association of excision repair cross-complimentary group 1 gene polymorphisms with breast and ovarian cancer susceptibility

The role of excision repair cross-complimentary group 1 (ERCC1) gene polymorphisms in breast and ovarian cancer development has long been controversial and existing data were inconsistent. Here, we conducted a comprehensive meta-analysis to better clarify the association. Case-control studies published from December 2008 to November 2018 were assessed. The statistical analyses of the pooled odds ratios (ORs) and the corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. Fifteen articles with 24 case-control studies and 3 ERCC1 polymorphisms were enrolled. A total of 20 923 participants including 9896 cases and 11 027 controls were analyzed. The results showed that C to T variation in the ERCC1 rs11615 (C/T) polymorphisms was correlated with breast cancer susceptibility (T vs C: OR = 1.19, 95% CI = 1.02-1.38; TT + CT vs CC: OR = 1.24, 95% CI = 1.12-1.36). ERCC1 rs3212986 (C/A) polymorphisms posed an increased risk for breast and ovarian cancer as whole (A vs C: OR = 1.12, 95% CI = 1.01-1.25; AA + CA vs CC: OR = 1.11, 95% CI = 1.02-1.22), and presented especially higher risk for ovarian cancer (A vs C: OR = 1.31, 95% CI = 1.05-1.63; AA vs CA + CC: OR = 1.66, 95% CI = 1.12-2.47; AA vs CC: OR = 1.72, 95% CI = 1.12-2.64). Meanwhile, neither overall group analyses nor stratified analyses displayed any association of ERCC1 rs2298881 (A/C) polymorphisms in breast and ovarian cancer susceptibility. This meta-analysis suggested that ERCC1 rs11615 (C/T) polymorphisms were associated with breast cancer susceptibility and rs3212986 (C/A) polymorphisms were especially correlated with ovarian cancer risk. More case-control studies with well-adjusted data and diverse populations are essential for validation of our conclusion.