1
|
Lodge J, Kajtar L, Duxbury R, Hall D, Burley GA, Cordy J, Yates JW, Rattray Z. Quantifying antibody binding: techniques and therapeutic implications. MAbs 2025; 17:2459795. [PMID: 39957177 PMCID: PMC11834528 DOI: 10.1080/19420862.2025.2459795] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2024] [Revised: 01/22/2025] [Accepted: 01/23/2025] [Indexed: 02/18/2025] Open
Abstract
The binding kinetics of an antibody for its target antigen represent key determinants of its biological function and success as a novel biotherapeutic. Defining these interactions and kinetics is critical for understanding the pharmacological and pharmacodynamic profiles of antibodies in therapeutic applications, with line of sight to clinical translation. In this review, we discuss the latest developments in approaches to measure and modulate antibody-antigen interactions, including antibody engineering, novel antibody formats, current, and emerging technologies for measuring antibody-antigen binding interactions, and emerging perspectives within the field. We also explore how emerging computational methods are set to become powerful tools for modeling antibody-binding interactions under physiologically relevant conditions. Finally, we consider the therapeutic implications of modulating target engagement in terms of pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James Lodge
- Large Molecule Discovery, GSK, Stevenage, UK
- Strathclyde Institute of Pharmacy and Biomedical Sciences, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, UK
| | - Lewis Kajtar
- Large Molecule Discovery, GSK, Stevenage, UK
- Strathclyde Institute of Pharmacy and Biomedical Sciences, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, UK
| | - Rachel Duxbury
- Large Molecule Discovery, GSK, Stevenage, UK
- Strathclyde Institute of Pharmacy and Biomedical Sciences, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, UK
| | - David Hall
- Large Molecule Discovery, GSK, Stevenage, UK
| | - Glenn A. Burley
- Department of Pure and Applied Chemistry, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, UK
| | | | | | - Zahra Rattray
- Strathclyde Institute of Pharmacy and Biomedical Sciences, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Smith TC, Vasilakos G, Shaffer SA, Puglise JM, Chou CH, Barton ER, Luna EJ. Novel γ-sarcoglycan interactors in murine muscle membranes. Skelet Muscle 2022; 12:2. [PMID: 35065666 PMCID: PMC8783446 DOI: 10.1186/s13395-021-00285-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/22/2021] [Accepted: 12/15/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The sarcoglycan complex (SC) is part of a network that links the striated muscle cytoskeleton to the basal lamina across the sarcolemma. The SC coordinates changes in phosphorylation and Ca++-flux during mechanical deformation, and these processes are disrupted with loss-of-function mutations in gamma-sarcoglycan (Sgcg) that cause Limb girdle muscular dystrophy 2C/R5. METHODS To gain insight into how the SC mediates mechano-signaling in muscle, we utilized LC-MS/MS proteomics of SC-associated proteins in immunoprecipitates from enriched sarcolemmal fractions. Criteria for inclusion were co-immunoprecipitation with anti-Sgcg from C57BL/6 control muscle and under-representation in parallel experiments with Sgcg-null muscle and with non-specific IgG. Validation of interaction was performed in co-expression experiments in human RH30 rhabdomyosarcoma cells. RESULTS We identified 19 candidates as direct or indirect interactors for Sgcg, including the other 3 SC proteins. Novel potential interactors included protein-phosphatase-1-catalytic-subunit-beta (Ppp1cb, PP1b) and Na+-K+-Cl--co-transporter NKCC1 (SLC12A2). NKCC1 co-localized with Sgcg after co-expression in human RH30 rhabdomyosarcoma cells, and its cytosolic domains depleted Sgcg from cell lysates upon immunoprecipitation and co-localized with Sgcg after detergent permeabilization. NKCC1 localized in proximity to the dystrophin complex at costameres in vivo. Bumetanide inhibition of NKCC1 cotransporter activity in isolated muscles reduced SC-dependent, strain-induced increases in phosphorylation of extracellular signal-regulated kinases 1 and 2 (ERK1/2). In silico analysis suggests that candidate SC interactors may cross-talk with survival signaling pathways, including p53, estrogen receptor, and TRIM25. CONCLUSIONS Results support that NKCC1 is a new SC-associated signaling protein. Moreover, the identities of other candidate SC interactors suggest ways by which the SC and NKCC1, along with other Sgcg interactors such as the membrane-cytoskeleton linker archvillin, may regulate kinase- and Ca++-mediated survival signaling in skeletal muscle.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tara C Smith
- Department of Radiology, Division of Cell Biology & Imaging, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA, USA
| | - Georgios Vasilakos
- Applied Physiology & Kinesiology, College of Health & Human Performance, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Scott A Shaffer
- Biochemistry and Molecular Pharmacology, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA, USA.,Mass Spectrometry Facility, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Shrewsbury, MA, USA
| | - Jason M Puglise
- Applied Physiology & Kinesiology, College of Health & Human Performance, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Chih-Hsuan Chou
- Applied Physiology & Kinesiology, College of Health & Human Performance, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Elisabeth R Barton
- Applied Physiology & Kinesiology, College of Health & Human Performance, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
| | - Elizabeth J Luna
- Department of Radiology, Division of Cell Biology & Imaging, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Christopher JA, Stadler C, Martin CE, Morgenstern M, Pan Y, Betsinger CN, Rattray DG, Mahdessian D, Gingras AC, Warscheid B, Lehtiö J, Cristea IM, Foster LJ, Emili A, Lilley KS. Subcellular proteomics. NATURE REVIEWS. METHODS PRIMERS 2021; 1:32. [PMID: 34549195 PMCID: PMC8451152 DOI: 10.1038/s43586-021-00029-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 71] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/15/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
The eukaryotic cell is compartmentalized into subcellular niches, including membrane-bound and membrane-less organelles. Proteins localize to these niches to fulfil their function, enabling discreet biological processes to occur in synchrony. Dynamic movement of proteins between niches is essential for cellular processes such as signalling, growth, proliferation, motility and programmed cell death, and mutations causing aberrant protein localization are associated with a wide range of diseases. Determining the location of proteins in different cell states and cell types and how proteins relocalize following perturbation is important for understanding their functions, related cellular processes and pathologies associated with their mislocalization. In this Primer, we cover the major spatial proteomics methods for determining the location, distribution and abundance of proteins within subcellular structures. These technologies include fluorescent imaging, protein proximity labelling, organelle purification and cell-wide biochemical fractionation. We describe their workflows, data outputs and applications in exploring different cell biological scenarios, and discuss their main limitations. Finally, we describe emerging technologies and identify areas that require technological innovation to allow better characterization of the spatial proteome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Josie A. Christopher
- Department of Biochemistry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
- Milner Therapeutics Institute, Jeffrey Cheah Biomedical Centre, Cambridge, UK
| | - Charlotte Stadler
- Department of Protein Sciences, Karolinska Institutet, Science for Life Laboratory, Solna, Sweden
| | - Claire E. Martin
- Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute, Sinai Health System, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Marcel Morgenstern
- Institute of Biology II, Biochemistry and Functional Proteomics, Faculty of Biology, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Yanbo Pan
- Department of Oncology and Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Science for Life Laboratory, Solna, Sweden
| | - Cora N. Betsinger
- Department of Molecular Biology, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA
| | - David G. Rattray
- Department of Biochemistry & Molecular Biology, Michael Smith Laboratories, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Diana Mahdessian
- Department of Protein Sciences, Karolinska Institutet, Science for Life Laboratory, Solna, Sweden
| | - Anne-Claude Gingras
- Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute, Sinai Health System, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Molecular Genetics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Bettina Warscheid
- Institute of Biology II, Biochemistry and Functional Proteomics, Faculty of Biology, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
- BIOSS and CIBSS Signaling Research Centers, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Janne Lehtiö
- Department of Oncology and Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Science for Life Laboratory, Solna, Sweden
| | - Ileana M. Cristea
- Department of Molecular Biology, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA
| | - Leonard J. Foster
- Department of Biochemistry & Molecular Biology, Michael Smith Laboratories, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Andrew Emili
- Center for Network Systems Biology, Boston University, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Kathryn S. Lilley
- Department of Biochemistry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
- Milner Therapeutics Institute, Jeffrey Cheah Biomedical Centre, Cambridge, UK
| |
Collapse
|