Magnetic resonance imaging presentation of deep infiltrating endometriosis nodules before and after pregnancy: A case series

Magnetic resonance imaging presentation of diffuse and focal adenomyosis before and after pregnancy

RESEARCH QUESTION

Is there a change in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) criteria of diffuse and focal phenotypes of adenomyosis before and after pregnancy?

DESIGN

A retrospective, monocentric, observational study in a single academic tertiary referral centre for endometriosis diagnosis and management. Women were followed for symptomatic adenomyosis, and without a prior history of surgery who give birth after 24+0 weeks. For each patient, pelvic MRI pre- and post-pregnancy was performed by two experienced radiologists with the same image acquisition protocol. Diffuse and focal adenomyosis MRI presentation were analysed before and after pregnancy.

RESULTS

Between January 2010 and September 2020, of the 139 patients analysed, 96 (69.1%) had adenomyosis at MRI distributed as follow: 22 (15.8%) presented diffuse adenomyosis, 55 (39.6%) focal adenomyosis and 19 (13.7%) both phenotypes. The frequency of isolated diffuse adenomyosis on MRI was significantly lower before versus after pregnancy (n = 22 [15.8%] versus n = 41 [29.5%], P = 0.01). The frequency of isolated focal adenomyosis was significantly higher before pregnancy than after pregnancy (n = 55 [39.6%] versus n = 34 [24.5%], P = 0.01). The mean volume of all focal adenomyosis lesions on MRI decreased significantly after pregnancy, from 6.7 ± 2.5 mm3 to 6.4 ± 2.3 mm3, P = 0.01.

CONCLUSION

The current data indicate that, based on MRI, there is an increase in diffuse adenomyosis and a decrease in focal adenomyosis after pregnancy.

Adolescent endometriosis: prevalence increases with age on magnetic resonance imaging scan

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the prevalence on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of ovarian endometrioma (OMA) and deep infiltrating endometriosis (DIE) in adolescents presenting with severe dysmenorrhea.

DESIGN

Prospective study.

SETTING

Clinic.

PATIENT(S)

A total of 345 adolescents aged 12-20 years referred to the radiologic MRI department unit between September 2019 and June 2020.

INTERVENTION(S)

Multiplanar pelvic MRI with cine MRI was performed. Data on the medical history with systematic questioning were collected for each patient before the scan.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

Data on the endometriosis phenotypes (OMA and/or DIE), distribution of anatomical lesions, and adenomyosis were evaluated and recorded using a dedicated MRI spreadsheet. Myometrial contractions were systematically reported for each case. The data were correlated with the characteristics of the patients and severity of painful symptoms evaluated using a visual analog scale.

RESULT(S)

The prevalence rates of endometriosis and adenomyosis were 39.3% (121 patients) and 11.4% (35 patients), respectively. Among the adolescents with endometriosis, 25 (20.7%) presented with OMA, and 107 (88.4%) presented with DIE. The odds ratios (confidence intervals) for each pairwise comparison between the age distributions were 2.3 (1.4-3.8) for 15-18 vs. <15 years of age and 3.3 (1.2-8.5) for 18-20 vs. <15 years of age, highlighting a predominance of cases after 18 years of age. Uterine contractions were visualized in 34.4% of cases, with no particular association with endometriosis. No clinical risk factor was identified as being particularly associated with endometriosis. Notably, the visual analog scale score was the same for cases with and without endometriosis.

CONCLUSION(S)

Severe endometriosis phenotypes (OMA and/or DIE) can be observed in adolescents with intense dysmenorrhea, with a linear increase in prevalence over time resulting in a clear predominance after 18 years of age. Endometriosis in adolescents is a challenging clinical problem with a long delay in diagnosis. Imaging can help reduce this delay in young patients with suggestive symptoms.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT05153512.

Endometriosis and pregnancy: The illusion of recovery

The objective of this study was to investigate the feelings and experiences of infertile women with deep infiltrating endometriosis during and after a first pregnancy achieved by in-vitro fertilization (IVF). We conducted a qualitative monocentric study between May and November 2020. Semi-structured interviews were undertaken with infertile women with deep infiltrating endometriosis who achieved a first pregnancy by IVF and delivered at least two years prior to the interview. Data analysis was performed using an inductive approach to identify recurrent categories and themes. Fifteen interviews were conducted to reach data saturation. Pregnancy appeared to improve all components of the experience of endometriosis that were explored (psychological and physical well-being, social relationships, professional life, and sexuality). This improvement was only temporary and all symptoms and negative aspects of the women’s quality of life reappeared after a variable period.

Role of Ultrasound in the Assessment and Differential Diagnosis of Pelvic Pain in Pregnancy

Pelvic pain (PP) is common in pregnant women and can be caused by several diseases, including obstetrics, gynaecological, gastrointestinal, genitourinary, and vascular disorders. Timely and accurate diagnosis as well as prompt treatment are crucial for the well-being of the mother and foetus. However, these are very challenging. It should be considered that the physiological changes occurring during pregnancy may confuse the diagnosis. In this setting, ultrasound (US) represents the first-line imaging technique since it is readily and widely available and does not use ionizing radiations. In some cases, US may be conclusive for the diagnosis (e.g., if it detects no foetal cardiac activity in suspected spontaneous abortion; if it shows an extrauterine gestational sac in suspected ectopic pregnancy; or if it reveals a dilated, aperistaltic, and blind-ending tubular structure arising from the cecum in suspicious of acute appendicitis). Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), overcoming some limits of US, represents the second-line imaging technique when an US is negative or inconclusive, to detect the cause of bowel obstruction, or to characterize adnexal masses.

Conservative Management of Rectovaginal Deep Endometriosis: Shaving Should Be Considered as the Primary Surgical Approach in a High Majority of Cases

Deep endometriosis infiltrating the rectum remains a challenging situation to manage, and it is even more important when ureters and pelvic nerves are also infiltrated. Removal of deep rectovaginal endometriosis is mandatory in case of symptoms strongly impairing quality of life, alteration of digestive, urinary, sexual and reproductive functions, or in case of growing. Extensive preoperative imaging is required to choose the right technique between laparoscopic shaving, disc excision, or rectal resection. When performed by skilled surgeons and well-trained teams, a very high majority of cases of deep endometriosis nodule (>95%) is feasible by the shaving technique, and this is associated with lower complication rates regarding rectal resection. In most cases, removing a part of the rectum is questionable according to the risk of complications, and the rectum should be preserved as far as possible. Shaving and rectal resection are comparable in terms of recurrence rates. As shaving is manageable whatever the size of the lesions, surgeons should consider rectal shaving as first-line surgery to remove rectal deep endometriosis. Rectal stenosis of more than 80% of the lumen, multiple bowel deep endometriosis nodules, and stenotic sigmoid colon lesions should be considered as indication for rectal resection, but this represents a minority of cases.

Deep endometriosis: The place of laparoscopic shaving

Deep endometriosis (DE) is considered to be one of the most challenging conditions to manage, especially when it invades surrounding organs like the rectum. Surgical excision of deep rectovaginal endometriosis is required when lesions are symptomatic, impairing bowel, urinary, sexual, and reproductive functions, or if they evolve. Preoperative radiological examination should be extensive to determine the appropriate surgery: laparoscopic shaving, disc excision, or rectal resection. We demonstrated that in the hands of experienced surgeons, rectal shaving is possible for DE in more than 95% of cases, with low complication rates compared to rectal resection. Shaving and bowel resection are associated with comparable recurrence rates. As shaving is indicated whatever the size of deep lesions, surgeons should first consider rectal shaving to remove DE. Bowel resection should only be performed in case of major rectal stenosis (>80%), multiple and/or posterior rectal lesions and stenotic sigmoid colon lesions.