Correlation of optic nerve and optic nerve sheath diameter with intracranial pressure in pigs

The Effect of Hydrocephalus on the Optic Nerve in the Presence of Intracranial Mass

OBJECTIVE

The measurement of optic nerve sheath diameter is a noninvasive, practical, and economical method used to identify increased intracranial pressure. The purpose of this study is to detect the preoperative and postoperative changes in optic nerve sheath diameter in patients with intracranial mass, to correlate these changes with optic nerve diameter variations, and to evaluate the impact of hydrocephalus on these alterations.

MATERIAL AND METHOD

This study was conducted with patients who presented to our clinic with complaints of intracranial mass, were decided for surgery, and underwent surgical procedures.

FINDINGS

The optic nerve and optic nerve sheath diameter measurement values were different preoperatively and postoperatively, with a significant decrease in the optic nerve sheath diameter in all groups in postoperative measurements, while the optic nerve diameter significantly increased.

CONCLUSIONS

Although there was no significant difference between the effects of hydrocephalus and intracranial mass-related increase in intracranial pressure on the optic nerve and optic nerve sheath, it was observed that hydrocephalus increased intracranial pressure when considering the Evans ratio. It has been determined that as ventricular dilatation increases, so does intracranial pressure, which leads to an increase in the diameter of the optic nerve sheath, resulting in papilledema and thinning of the optic nerve. These findings indicate the importance of early cerebrospinal fluid diversion and monitoring optic nerve sheath diameter in the management.

Optic Nerve Sheath Diameter for Assessing Prognosis after Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest

PURPOSE

Evaluate optic nerve sheath and pial diameters (ONSD, ONPD) via sonography and computed tomography (CT) after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (CA) and to compare their prognostic significance with other imaging and laboratory biomarkers.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A prospective observational study enrolling patients after successful resuscitation between December 2017 and August 2021. ONSD and ONPD were measured with sonography. Additionally, ONSD, and also grey-to-white ratio at basal ganglia (GWRBG) and cerebrum (GWRCBR), were assessed using CT. Lactate and neuron specific enolase (NSE) blood levels were measured.

RESULTS

Sonographically measured ONSD and ONPD yielded no significant difference between survival and non-survival (p values ≥0.4). Meanwhile, CT assessed ONSD, GWRBG, GWRCBR, and NSE levels significantly differed regarding both, survival (p values ≤0.005) and neurological outcome groups (p values ≤0.04). For survival prognosis, GWRBG, GWRCBR, and NSE levels appeared as excellent predictors; in predicting a good neurological outcome, NSE had the highest accuracy.

CONCLUSIONS

CT diagnostics, in particular GWRBG and GWRCBR, as well as NSE as laboratory biomarker, appear as excellent outcome predictors. Meanwhile, our data lead us to recommend caution in utilizing sonography assessed ONSD and ONPD for prognostic decision-making post-CA.

Optic Nerve Ultrasound Evaluation in Animals and Normal Subjects

In recent years, ultrasonographic measurement of the optic nerve sheath diameter (ONSD) has been widely used to identify the presence of increased intracranial pressure (ICP). Intracranial hypertension is a life-threatening condition that can be caused by various neurological and non-neurological disorders, and it is associated to poor clinical results. Ultrasonography could be used to qualitatively and efficiently detect ICP increases, but to reach this purpose, clear cut-off values are mandatory. The aim of this review is to provide a wide overview of the most important scientific publications on optic nerve ultrasound normal values assessment published in the last 30 years. A total of 42 articles selected from PubMed medical database was included in this review. Our analysis showed that ocular ultrasonography is considered to be a valuable diagnostic tool, especially when intracranial hypertension is suspected, but unfortunately this research provided conflicting results that could be due to the different ultrasound protocols. This is mainly caused by the use of B scan alone, which presents several limitations. The use of B-scan coupled with the standardized A-scan approach could give more accurate, and reliable ultrasound evaluation, assuring higher data objectivity.