Cost-effectiveness of pembrolizumab for advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients with varying comorbidity burden

Patient-level simulation models in cancer care: a systematic review

Background

Patient-level simulation (PLS) models overcome some major limitations of conventional cohort models and have broad applicability in healthcare, yet limited knowledge exists about their potential in cancer care.

Objectives

This systematic review aims to: (1) describe the application areas of PLS models in cancer care, (2) identify commonly used model structures, (3) evaluate the quality of reporting based on established guidelines, and (4) critically discuss the potential and limitations of PLS models in this context.

Methods

A systematic literature search was completed in Web of Science, PubMed, EMBASE and EconLit. Reasons underlying the use of PLS models were identified with a conventional inductive content analysis and reporting quality was assessed with an 18-item checklist based on the ISPOR-SMDM guidelines.

Results

The number of publications increased over time and most studies used state-transition microsimulation (49.25%) or discrete event simulation (48.51%). Two main application areas could be discerned, namely disease progression modelling (DPM) (78.36%) and health and care systems operation (HCSO) (21.64%). In the DPM domain, the use of PLS models was mainly motivated by the need to represent patient heterogeneity and history. In the HCSO domain, PLS models were used to better understand and improve cancer care delivery. Average reporting quality was 65.2% and did not improve over time.

Conclusion

PLS models can be used to simulate the progression of cancer and to model cancer care delivery. In the DPM domain more direct comparisons with cohort models are required to establish the relative advantages of PLS models and in the HCSO domain the impact on clinical practice needs to be systematically assessed. Furthermore, adherence to the ISPOR-SMDM guidelines should be improved.

Adverse Event Costs and Cost-Effectiveness Analyses of Anticancer Drugs: A Systematic Review

Importance

Accurately quantifying adverse event (AE) costs is essential for cost-effectiveness analyses (CEAs) of anticancer drugs. Misestimates in AE costs may significantly affect cost-effectiveness conclusions.

Objective

To assess whether AE cost quantification in anticancer drug CEAs accurately reflects the true cost of AEs and to evaluate whether replacing AE costs with actual values affects cost-effectiveness conclusions.

Evidence Review

A systematic search of PubMed, Web of Science, and Tufts CEA databases was conducted from October 24 to December 1, 2023, with an additional search from November 4 to 10, 2024, for English-language CEAs and claims-based studies examining AE costs for anticancer drugs published between January 2003 and December 2023. Claims-based AE costs were considered to represent actual values. AE costs were compared in absolute terms and as a proportion of total medical costs. Impact of replacing CEA AE cost estimates with actual values for incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) was examined at thresholds of $100 000 and $150 000 per quality-adjusted life year (QALY). AE cost differences between CEA estimates and actual values and their impact on ICERs were the main outcomes.

Findings

The sample included 11 claims-based US studies with 34 022 patients and 102 US payer-perspective CEAs. AE cost estimates in CEAs were consistently lower than actual values, with a median difference of 9.73% (IQR, 5.15%-27.22%; P = .002) in proportion of total medical costs and of $17 201 (IQR, $13 365-$48 970; P = .03) in absolute costs. Adjusting AE costs led to an ICER change of $42 656 per QALY, altering cost-effectiveness conclusions in 8 of 17 cases (47.1%). Among the 102 CEAs, 41 (40.2%) did not report AE types; of the remaining 61 (59.8%), 48 (78.7%) focused on treatment-related AEs instead of all-cause AEs. Of all CEAs, 79 (77.5%) considered grade 3 or higher AEs, ignoring grades 1 and 2. Only 13 studies (12.7%) accounted for AE-related dose reductions or interruptions, 87 (85.3%) did not consider postprogression AE costs, and 77 (82.8%) assumed AEs occurred only in the first treatment cycle. Substantial variability was observed in both drug AE and unit AE costs across studies.

Conclusions and Relevance

In this systematic review of AE costs in oncology CEAs, AE costs were frequently underestimated, potentially altering cost-effectiveness conclusions. Key problems included incomplete AE inclusion, inaccurate AE cost estimates, overlooked long-term AEs, and unaccounted dose modifications. Best practices and standardized guidelines should be established to improve AE cost quantification in oncology CEAs.

Association of cardiovascular disease and CIRS‑G and ACE‑27 comorbidity indices with pathological complete response of non‑small cell lung cancer to neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy

Neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy (NCIO) is a new and effective treatment for cancer, but its efficacy in treating certain patients is unclear. We previously found that comorbidity was an independent factor associated with the pathological complete response (pCR) of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) to NCIO. However, we did not address which comorbidities or comorbidity indices were associated with pCR. The present study retrospectively collected the data for NSCLC patients who underwent NCIO after surgery at The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University (Hunan, China) between January 2019 and July 2022. The associations between comorbidities/comorbidity indices and pCR rates/clinicopathological factors were analyzed. In total, 101 eligible patients with stage IIB-IIIC NSCLC were enrolled. Comorbid hypertension [odds ratio (OR)=0.321(0.110-0.937)], vascular disease [OR=0.275 (0.111-0.677)] and cardiovascular disease [OR=0.272 (0.114-0.646)] were all significantly associated with pCR (all P<0.05). The comorbidity indices Cumulative Illness Rating Scale-Geriatric (CIRS-G) ≥2 [OR=0.360 (0.154-0.840)], CIRS-G ≥3 [OR=0.404 (0.179-0.912)], CIRS-G ≥4 [OR=0.293 (0.105-0.817)] and Adult Comorbidity Evaluation-27 (ACE-27) ≥2 [OR=0.427 (0.192-0.950)] were all significantly associated with pCR (all P<0.05). Cardiovascular disease was the only independent risk factor for pCR [adjusted OR=0.272 (0.114-0.646); P=0.003] according to multivariate logistic analysis. In conclusion, cardiovascular comorbidities and the CIRS-G and ACE-27 indices were associated with the effectiveness of NCIO and clinicopathological factors. These results could help to screen for the most suitable NSCLC patients for NCIO.

Cost-effectiveness of cemiplimab plus chemotherapy vs pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy as first-line treatment for advanced non-small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

In 2022, the US Food and Drug Administration approved cemiplimab in combination with chemotherapy (CCT) as a first-line treatment for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (aNSCLC). However, whether CCT presents a cost-effective alternative to the previously preferred first-line treatment, pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy (PCT), remains uncertain.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of CCT vs PCT as the first-line treatment for aNSCLC from a US health care payer perspective.

METHODS

A 3-state partitioned survival model with a 10-year horizon was constructed. Clinical data were derived from the EMPOWER-Lung 3, KEYNOTE-407, and KEYNOTE-189 trials. Costs and quality of life were obtained from published 2024 US list prices and literature. The cost, quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) gained, and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) were calculated. All outcomes were discounted at a rate of 3% per year. Scenario analyses, deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses, and subgroup analyses were performed for patients with different programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) levels.

RESULTS

In the base-case analysis, the total cost of PCT was $207,926 with 1.609 QALYs, whereas CCT had a total cost of $175,247 with 1.657 QALYs. Results from the scenario analyses were consistent with the base-case analysis, indicating that CCT was a dominant treatment strategy over PCT (ICER =-$675,304 per QALY). The cost of pembrolizumab highly impacted the ICER. At a willingness-to-pay threshold of $150,000 per QALY, CCT would be accepted as a cost-effective option 96.9% of the time. In subgroup analyses, CCT remained a dominant alternative to PCT for patients with PD-L1 levels of at least 50% and 1%-49%.

CONCLUSIONS

This cost-effectiveness analysis suggests that CCT is a dominant first-line treatment option for aNSCLC with PD-L1 levels of at least 1% compared with PCT.

A QALY is [still] a QALY is [still] a QALY? : Evaluating proportional shortfall as the answer to the problem of equity in healthcare allocations

Despite clinical evidence of drug superiority, therapeutic modalities, like combination immunotherapy, are mostly considered cost-ineffective due to their high costs per life year(s) gained. This paper, taking an ethical stand, reevaluates the standard cost-effectiveness analysis with that of the more recent justice-enhanced methods and concludes by pointing out the shortcomings of the current methodologies.

Cost-Effectiveness of Treatment Optimisation with Biomarkers for Immunotherapy in Solid Tumours: A Systematic Review

This study investigated the health economic evaluations of predictive biomarker testing in solid tumours treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Searching PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science from June 2010 to February 2022, 58 relevant articles were reviewed out of the 730 screened. The focus was predominantly on non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) (65%) and other solid tumours (40%). Among the NSCLC studies, 21 out of 35 demonstrated cost-effectiveness, notably for pembrolizumab as first-line treatment when preceded by PD-L1 assessment, cost-effective at a threshold of $100,000/QALY compared to the standard of care. However, for bladder, cervical, and triple-negative breast cancers (TNBCs), no economic evaluations met the affordability threshold of $100,000/QALY. Overall, the review highlights a certain degree of uncertainty about the cost-effectiveness of ICI. In particular, we found PD-L1 expression associated with ICI treatment to be a cost-effective strategy, particularly in NSCLC, urothelial, and renal cell carcinoma. The findings suggest the potential value of predictive biomarker testing, specifically with pembrolizumab in NSCLC, while indicating challenges in achieving cost-effectiveness for certain other solid tumours.

Cost-effectiveness of first-line immunotherapy for advanced non-small cell lung cancer with different PD-L1 expression levels: A comprehensive overview

BACKGROUND

Immunotherapies can substantially improve treatment efficacy, despite their high cost. A comprehensive overview of the cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in patients with non-small cell lung cancer based on different tumor proportion scores (TPSs) was conducted.

METHODS

PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Health Technology Assessment Database, and NHS Economic Evaluation databases were searched from their inception until August 24, 2022. Data relevant to the CEA results were recorded, and quality assessments conducted based on the Quality of Health Economic Studies (QHES) process.

FINDINGS

Fifty-one original studies from seven countries were included. The mean QHES score was 77.0 (range: 53-95). Twenty-seven studies were classified as high-quality, and the rest as fair quality. Pembrolizumab, nivolumab, ipilimumab, atezolizumab, camrelizumab, cemiplimab, sintilimab, tislelizumab, and durvalumab were identified using three TPS categories. While nivolumab plus ipilimumab and pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy were unlikely to be cost-effective in China, the results for the US were uncertain. Atezolizumab combinations were not cost-effective in China or the US, and tislelizumab and sintilimab were cost-effective in China. For TPSs ≥ 50%, the pembrolizumab monotherapy could be cost-effective in some developed countries. Cemiplimab was more cost-effective than chemotherapy, pembrolizumab, and atezolizumab in the US. For TPSs ≥ 1%, the cost-effectiveness of pembrolizumab was controversial due to the different willingness-to-pay thresholds.

CONCLUSIONS

None of the atezolizumab combination regimens were found to be cost-effective in any perspective of evaluations. Camrelizumab, tislelizumab, and sintilimab have lower ICERs compared to atezolizumab, pembrolizumab, and nivolumab in China. Cemiplimab may be a more affordable alternative to pembrolizumab or atezolizumab. However, it remains unclear which ICIs are the best choices for each country. Future CEAs are required to select comprehensive regimens alongside randomized trials and real-world studies to help verify the economics of ICIs in specific decision-making settings.

Association of medical comorbidities and cardiovascular disease with toxicity and survival among patients receiving checkpoint inhibitor immunotherapy

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Medical comorbidities (MC) are highly prevalent among patients with cancer and predict worse outcomes for traditional therapies. This association is poorly understood for checkpoint inhibitor immunotherapy (IO). We aimed to explore the relationship between common MC including cardiovascular disease (CVD), immune-related adverse events (irAEs), and overall survival (OS) among patients receiving IO for advanced cancer.

METHODS

This is a retrospective cohort study of 671 patients with any cancer who received IO at our institution from 2011 to 2018. Clinical data were abstracted via chart review and query of ICD-10 codes and used to calculate modified Charlson comorbidity index (mCCI) scores. The primary outcomes were the association of individual MC with irAEs and OS using bivariate and multivariable analyses. Secondary outcomes included association of mCCI score with irAEs and OS.

RESULTS

Among 671 patients, 62.1% had a mCCI score ≥ 1. No individual MC were associated with irAEs or OS. Increased CCI score was associated with decreased OS (p < 0.01) but not with irAEs. Grade ≥ 3 irAEs were associated with increased OS among patients without CVD (HR 0.37 [95% CI: 0.25, 0.55], p < 0.01), but not among patients with CVD.

CONCLUSIONS

No specific MC predicted risk of irAEs or OS for patients receiving IO. Increased CCI score did not predict risk of irAEs but was associated with shorter OS. This suggests IO is safe for patients with MC, but MC may limit survival benefits of IO. CVD may predict shorter OS in patients with irAEs and should be evaluated among patients receiving IO.

First-Line Treatment of Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer in the Elderly

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Treatment of elderly patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) represents still a challenge for higher risk of comorbidity, deteriorations in physical, organ, and cognitive functions, a potentially different pharmacokinetics, diminished social support, and immunosenescense. Here, we aim to report and analyse the most relevant and recent literature defining the role of chemotherapy, targeted therapy, and immunotherapy in the first-line treatment of elderly patients with metastatic NSCLC.

RECENT FINDINGS

In the past years, treatment of NSCLC was based on cytotoxic chemotherapy, but recently, new drugs are deeply changing therapeutic standards, such as targeted therapy for oncogene addicted NSCLC, and immunotherapy. Despite lung cancer is primarily a disease of the elderly, they are under-represented in clinical trials. Targeted therapies and immune checkpoint inhibitors are largely considered to be appropriated for elderly too, because of their manageability, and fewer side effects compared with cytotoxic chemotherapy. However, we need further investigations to define and to choose the better treatment option for each elderly patient.

Prognostication Based on Texture Analysis of Baseline 18F Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography in Nonsmall-Cell Lung Carcinoma Patients Who Underwent Platinum-Based Chemotherapy as First-Line Treatment

OBJECTIVE

Our study aims to establish the potential for tumor heterogeneity evaluated using 18F fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (F-18 FDG PET/CT) texture analysis in nonsmall-cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) patients who underwent platinum-based chemotherapy to provide an independent marker for overall survival (OS) of more than 1-year.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 42 patients (34 male and 8 female) with biopsy-proven NSCLC and mean age 55.33 ± 10.71 years who underwent a baseline F-18 FDG PET/CT and received platinum-based chemotherapy as first-line treatment were retrospectively included in the study. Ten first order, 21 s order texture parameters and 7 SUV and metabolic tumor volume (MTV) based metabolic parameters were calculated. All these parameters were compared between the two survival groups based on OS ≥1 year and OS <1 year. Cut-offs of significant parameters were determined using receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. Survival patterns were compared by log-rank test and presented using Kaplan-Meier curves. Cox proportion hazard model was used to determine the independent prognostic marker for 1 year OS.

RESULTS

In univariate survival analysis, 3 first order texture parameters (i.e. mean, median, root mean square with hazard ratios [HRs] 2.509 [P = 0.034], 2.590 [P = 0.05], 2.509 [P = 0.034], respectively) and 6 s order texture parameters (i.e. mean, auto correlation, cluster prominence, cluster shade, sum average and sum variance with HRs 2.509 [P = 0.034], 2.509 [P = 0.034], 3.929 [0.007], 2.903 [0.018], 2.954 [0.016] and 2.906 [0.014], respectively) were significantly associated with 1 year OS in these patients. Among the metabolic parameters, only metabolic tumor volume whole-body was significantly associated with 1 year OS. In multivariate survival analysis, cluster prominence came out as the independent predictor of 1 year OS.

CONCLUSION

Texture analysis based on F-18 FDG PET/CT is potentially beneficial in the prediction of OS ≥1 year in NSCLC patients undergoing platinum-based chemotherapy as first-line treatment. Thus, can be used to stratify the patients which will not be benefitted with platinum-based chemotherapy and essentially needs to undergo some other therapy option.

The Position of EGF Deprivation in the Management of Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has faced a therapeutic revolution with the advent of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and immune checkpoints inhibitors (ICIs) approved for first and subsequent therapies. CIMAvax-EGF is a chemical conjugate between human-recombinant EGF and P64, a recombinant protein from Neisseria meningitides, which induces neutralizing antibodies against EGF. In the last 15 years, it has been extensively evaluated in advanced NSCLC patients. CIMAvax-EGF is safe, even after extended use, and able to keep EGF serum concentration below detectable levels. In a randomized phase III study, CIMAvax-EGF increased median overall survival of advanced NSCLC patients with at least stable disease after front-line chemotherapy. Patients bearing squamous-cell or adenocarcinomas and serum EGF concentration above 870 pg/ml had better survival compared to control patients treated with best supportive care as maintenance, confirming tumors' sensitivity to the EGF depletion. This manuscript reviews the state-of-the-art NSCLC therapy and proposes the most promising scenarios for evaluating CIMAvax-EGF, particularly in combination with TKIs or ICIs. We hypothesize that the optimal combination of CIMAvax-EGF with established therapies can further contribute to transform advanced cancer into a manageable chronic disease, compatible with years of good quality of life.

Immunotherapy Utilization Among Patients With Metastatic NSCLC: Impact of Comorbidities

In patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (mNSCLC), the extent to which immunotherapy utilization rate varies by comorbidities is unclear. Using the National Cancer Database from 2015 to 2016, we assessed the association between levels of comorbidity and immunotherapy utilization among mNSCLC patients. Burden of comorbidities was ascertained based on the modified Charlson-Deyo score and categorized as an ordinal variable (0, 1, and ≥2). Immunotherapy utilization was determined based on registry data. Multivariable logistic regressions were used to estimate adjusted odds ratios (aOR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for the comorbidity score while adjusting for sociodemographic factors, histopathologic subtype, surgery, chemotherapy, radiotherapy, insurance, facility type, and other cancer history. Subgroup analyses were conducted by age and race/ethnicity. Overall, of the 89,030 patients with mNSCLC, 38.6% (N=34,382) had the comorbidity score of ≥1. Most patients were non-Hispanic white (82.3%, N=73,309) and aged 65 years and above (63.2%, N=56,300), with the mean age of 68.4 years (SD=10.6). Only 7.0% (N=6220) of patients received immunotherapy during 2015-2106. Patients with a comorbidity score of ≥2 had a significantly lower rate of immunotherapy utilization versus those without comorbidities (aOR=0.85; 95% CI, 0.78-0.93; P-trend<0.01). In subgroup analysis by age, association patterns were similar among patients younger than 65 and those aged 65-74 years. There were no significant differences in subgroup analysis by race/ethnicity, although statistical significance was only observed for white patients (comorbidity score ≥2 vs. 0: aOR=0.85; 95% CI, 0.77-0.93; P-trend<0.01). In conclusion, mNSCLC patients with a high burden of comorbidities are less likely to receive immunotherapy.

Cost-effectiveness analyses of targeted therapy and immunotherapy for advanced non-small cell lung cancer in the United States: a systematic review

Introduction: Mutation-targeting and immuno-oncology drugs are revolutionizing the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Cost-effectiveness analyses (CEA) of these drugs have been conducted using various analytical methods and cost-effectiveness thresholds. This systematic review provides a comprehensive summary of the available evidence.Area covered: PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library were used to select for CEA of targeted therapies for NSCLC in the United States published between 2008 and 2020. Among the 28 included studies, a majority were published from 2017 to 2020 (n = 18) and more than half targeted non-squamous NSCLC (n = 15). The most frequently evaluated therapy was pembrolizumab (n = 11), followed by bevacizumab (n = 8) and erlotinib (n = 4). After 2009, all included studies applied $100,000 or more thresholds. Thresholds of studies supported by industry (median = $150,000) were more distributed than those of studies supported by nonprofits (median = $100,000).Expert commentary: Medications of interest have changed and are individualized to particular mutations. The cost-effectiveness thresholds varied among sponsors but generally trended to increase over time. This review provides an overview of the available cost-effectiveness findings for stakeholders and contributes to evidence-based practice.

Economic Burden of Checkpoint Inhibitor Immunotherapy for the Treatment of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer in US Clinical Practice

PURPOSE

The efficacy of checkpoint inhibitor (CPI) immunotherapy in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is limited by a lack of strongly predictive response markers, subjecting patients to potential underutilization of alternative effective treatments, increased risk for futile care, and unnecessary costs. Here, we characterize the extent to which basic molecular tumor-marker testing has been performed for NSCLC therapy selection in the United States, and compare medical resource utilization and costs in CPI-treated patients versus CPI-eligible patients treated with other therapies.

METHODS

We identified a cohort of CPI-treated patients with NSCLC and a propensity score-matched cohort of CPI-eligible patients with NSCLC treated with non-CPI therapies (3095 patients in each group), using US administrative claims data covering the pre- and postinitial FDA-approval period for nivolumab, pembrolizumab, and atezolizumab (October 2012 to September 2017). We describe the utilization of recommended baseline molecular testing for CPI selection (pre-index date for CPI or other anticancer therapy), including programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) immunohistochemistry, ALK rearrangement and EGFR mutation testing, and pre- and postindex treatment patterns. All-cause medical resource utilization and semiannual total reimbursement (costs) were compared between CPI-treated and non-CPI-treated patients.

FINDINGS

At baseline, in the propensity score-matched CPI- and non-CPI-treated patient cohorts, mean PD-L1 immunohistochemistry test utilization for CPI selection was moderate (0.6 vs 0.7 per patient, respectively). However, we observed much lower mean utilization of testing for EGFR mutations (0.1 vs 0.1 per patient) and ALK rearrangements (0.1 vs 0.2 per patient). Postindex, the use of both chemotherapy and ALK- and EGFR-targeted therapies were decreased in both cohorts. The CPI-treated group had significantly higher mean medical resource utilization in nearly all categories in the postindex period, and total per-patient semiannual costs, than did the CPI-eligible patients who received other therapies (141,537 vs 75,429 US dollars [USD]; P < 0.0001), driven by CPI drug reimbursement. Median (interquartile range) time on CPI was longest with pembrolizumab (113 [106-127] days), followed by nivolumab (105 [97-106] days) and atezolizumab (64 [50-85] days). Despite being associated with the lowest drug cost and the shortest treatment duration, atezolizumab was associated with the highest mean total per-patient semiannual costs (160,540 USD) compared with pembrolizumab (153,003 USD) and nivolumab (138,542 USD).

IMPLICATIONS

The advent of CPI treatment for NSCLC has added substantial care-related costs for patients and payers, concurrent with underutilization of minimum recommended molecular testing for therapy selection. Broad uptake of panel-based comprehensive targeted-therapy and immunotherapy profiling can promote optimal treatment selection and sequencing, reduce the likelihood of futile treatment, and further improve patient outcomes.

Real world data in the era of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors (ICIs): Increasing evidence and future applications in lung cancer

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) targeting programmed death 1 (PD-1) and PD-ligand 1 (PD-L1) quickly subverted the standard of treatment in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC), where they were first introduced in all comers previously treated advanced/metastatic NSCLC patients and subsequently in the first line of PD-L1 selected cases of metastatic and locally advanced disease. Treatment algorithm is an evolving landscape, where the introduction of front-line ICIs, with or without chemotherapy, unavoidably influences the following treatment lines. In this context, medical oncologists are currently facing many unclear issues, which have been not clarified so far by available data. Effectiveness and safety in special populations underrepresented in clinical trials - such as elderly, poor PS, hepatitis or human immunodeficiency virus-affected patients - are only a part of the unexplored side of ICIs in the real world. Indeed, pivotal randomized clinical trials (RCTs) often lack of external validity because eligibility criteria exclude some patient subgroups commonly treated in real-world clinical practice. Similarly, cost-effectiveness and sustainability of these innovative agents are important issues to be considered in the real-world. Though affected by several limitations, real-world evidence (RWE) studies allow to collect data regarding overall treated patients in clinical practice according to local authority regulations, overcoming the intrinsic limits of RCTs. The present review focuses on RWE about ICIs in lung cancer treatment, with particular reference to special patient populations, and discusses potential application of real-world data in a potential innovative drug development model.