The epidemiology of Hepatitis B, C and D in Germany: A scoping review

Estimated number of people infected with hepatitis B and C virus in Germany in 2013: a baseline prevalence estimate using the workbook method

Introduction

Hepatitis B (HBV) and hepatitis C (HCV) viral infections are uncommon in Germany, though these infections have a higher prevalence among certain subpopulations, such as some first-generation migrant groups, people who inject drugs (PWID), and HIV-positive men who have sex with men (HIV+MSM). Repeated estimates of the number of people infected with HBV and HCV are essential to facilitate the monitoring and elimination efforts by 2030. We estimated the total number of people infected with HBV and HCV in Germany, and the number in each specific subpopulation. We based our calculations on data from 2013, a year that we strategically chose to coincide with the availability of data from serological surveys, the advent of highly effective antiviral therapy for HCV, and significant migrant flows in the following years.

Methods

We used the workbook method, a technique that combines subpopulation size and prevalence data. We included different population groups (general population excluding vulnerable groups, migrants stratified by nationality, people who inject opioids (PWIO) and HIV+MSM). We estimated the number of people infected with HBV and the number of people infected with HCV. Estimates of the number of people infected with HBV and HCV are reported with the lower and upper confidence limits.

Results

We estimated 228,000 (179,000-291,000) HBV-infected adults (≥ 18 years of age) in Germany in 2013, of whom 41% (n = 93,000 [52,000-169,000]) were in the general population excluding vulnerable groups. Another 58% (132,000; 126,000-137,000) were migrants, 1.0% (2,400; 900-6,200) PWIO and 0.4% (1,000; 800-1,400) were HIV+MSM. We estimated 214,000 (135,000-340,000) HCV-infected adults in Germany in 2013, of whom 47% (100,000; 38,000-267,000) were in the general population excluding vulnerable groups, 26.0% (56,000; 47,000-66,000) were migrants, 26% (56,000; 50,000-62,000) were PWIO, and 1.0% (2,500; 2,200-2,800) were HIV+MSM, respectively.

Discussion

Our results indicate that more than half of HBV-infected individuals were migrants, and more than half of HCV-infected individuals were PWIO or migrants. This highlights the importance of including relevant subpopulations in national estimates, surveillance, prevention, and therapy. Our estimates serve as a baseline reference for subsequent updates and ongoing monitoring of HBV and HCV epidemiology in Germany.

Detection of substantial numbers of latent tuberculosis and positive hepatitis B serology results in rheumatology patients preparing to receive intensified immunosuppressive therapy in a low-prevalence country: why screening still matters

INTRODUCTION /OBJECTIVES

International guidelines recommend screening for latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) and chronic viral hepatitis infections before initiating intensified immunosuppressive therapy. We assessed the prevalence of positive screening tests for LTBI, hepatitis B virus (HBV), and hepatitis C virus (HCV) in patients screened at a large rheumatology outpatient center in Germany.

METHOD

This retrospective cohort study used electronic health records from adult rheumatology patients. The presence of LTBI was evaluated by chest X-rays, patient medical history/self-report, and QuantiFERON®-TB Gold Plus (QFT) interferon-gamma release assays. Antibodies to HBV core antigen (anti-HBc) and HCV were used to assess HBV and HCV, respectively. Statistically significant associations were evaluated by Fisher exact tests.

RESULTS

Of 697 screened patients with a rheumatological condition (61.3% female, mean age 60.0 years), 132 (18.9%) patients were positive for LTBI (99 [14.2%]), anti-HBc (39 [5.6%]), or anti-HCV (3 [0.4%]). Nine patients had more than one positive result; different infections were not significantly associated. QFT detected the most LTBI cases (59.5%) followed by patient report/history (42.4%) and chest X-rays (17.2%). Although most patients (83.8%) were positive on only one test, associations among LTBI tests were statistically significant. Biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (bDMARD) use was lower in patients with a positive LTBI screening result compared with all screened patients (73.7% vs 86.4%) and targeted synthetic DMARD (tsDMARD) use was higher (10.1% vs 5.9%).

CONCLUSIONS

Almost one-fifth of rheumatology patients preparing to initiate intensified immunosuppressive therapy have positive results on screening tests for LTBI or show evidence of exposure to HBV or HCV. These findings support the need for careful screening, even in "low-prevalence" countries.

Clinical utility of the Fibrosis-4 index for predicting mortality in patients with heart failure with or without metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease: a prospective cohort study

Background

The liver-heart axis potentially influences the risk of mortality in patients with heart failure. We aimed to identify the clinical utility of the fibrosis-4 (FIB-4) index in patients with heart failure for predicting mortality in the context of metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD).

Methods

Patients with heart failure and a subsample of healthy participants were enrolled in the MyoVasc study (NCT04064450) and followed for nine years. Participants with excessive alcohol consumption were excluded. The Fatty Liver Index (FLI) and FIB-4 index were used to classify MASLD and hepatic fibrosis, respectively. Data were adjusted for potential confounders. The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality.

Findings

2726 participants, including 172 healthy individuals, were included in the study. The participants had a mean age of 64.4 ± 11.2 years and a median FIB-4 index of 1.59 (interquartile range [1.17; 2.17]). There were 532 deaths. The FIB-4 index was predictive for all-cause mortality (hazard ratio (HR) 1.341, 95% confidence interval (CI) [1.273; 1.412], p < 0.0001). The HRs and 95% CIs for the FIB-4 index in FLI categories were 1.597 [1.256; 2.031] (p = 0.00013, FLI <30), 1.802 [1.519; 2.138] (p < 0.0001, FLI 30-60), and 1.292 [1.215; 1.374] (p < 0.0001, FLI ≥60). The interaction term for the FIB-4 index with FLI ≥60 (reference FLI <30) was HR 0.774 [0.617; 0.972] (p = 0.027), indicating a smaller impact of the FIB-4 index in FLI ≥60 than in FLI <30 (HR 1.664 [1.333; 2.077], p < 0.0001). Multivariable linear regressions revealed relevant independent relationships between the FIB-4 index and N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide, systolic dysfunction, diastolic dysfunction and left ventricular hypertrophy in participants with a FLI below 60.

Interpretation

In patients with heart failure, the FIB-4 index predicts all-cause mortality and relates to cardiac functional and structural changes, especially in those without MASLD.

Funding

Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz.

Inflammation in liver fibrosis and atrial fibrillation: A prospective population-based proteomic study

Background & Aims

Elevated liver stiffness has been associated with atrial fibrillation (AFib) in the general population. The mechanism underlying this association is unclear.

Methods

Participants were recruited from the general population and prospectively enrolled with follow-up for 5 years. The fibrosis-4 (FIB-4) index was used as a surrogate marker for liver fibrosis. Proteomics analysis was performed using the 92-target Olink inflammation panel. Validation was performed using the NAFLD fibrosis score (NFS), aspartate aminotransferase to platelet index (APRI), and repeat confirmation proteomics.

Results

A sample of 11,509 participants with a mean age of 54.0 ± 11.1 years, 51.3% women, and a median FIB-4 index of 0.85 (0.65/1.12), was used. The FIB-4 index was predictive for prevalent (FIB-4 index adjusted odds ratio (aOR) per SD: 1.100 with 95% CI 1.011-1.196; p = 0.026), but not incident AFib (log[FIB-4 index]) adjusted hazard ratio: 1.125 with 95% CI 0.943-1.342, p = 0.19). Elastic net regularized regression identified CCL20, DNER, and CXCL10 for prevalent AFib, and AXIN1, CXCL10, and Flt3L for the log(FIB-4 index) (per SD) as most important in common regulated proteins. The relationship between the FIB-4 index, the identified proteins, and AFib was relevant and reproduced at the 5-year follow-up for CXCL10 after adjusting for confounders (log[FIB-4 index] per SD - CXCL10 [per SD] adjusted β 0.160 with 95% CI 0.127-0.194, p <0.0001; CXCL10 [per SD] - AFib aOR 1.455 with 95% CI 1.217-1.741, p <0.0001), reproduced using the NFS and APRI, and corresponding to increased serum levels.

Conclusions

CXCL10 is linked to liver fibrosis, as determined by the FIB-4 index, and to prevalent AFib.

Impact and implications

How elevated liver stiffness relates to atrial fibrillation in the general population remains to be clarified. We hypothesized that systemic inflammation against a background of liver fibrosis produced from metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD), is involved in the pathophysiology of atrial fibrillation. Using large-scale targeted proteomics, we found that CXCL10 is related to both liver fibrosis, as defined by the fibrosis-4 index, and to atrial fibrillation. These results can aid evidence-based drug development for patients with atrial fibrillation and MASLD-related liver fibrosis.

[HIV/HCV Among Drug Users in Germany: Elimination Targets in the Mirror of Practice]

BACKGROUND

In 2016, the World Health Organization presented the first strategy for the elimination of viral hepatitis by 2030, following the goals of the Agenda 2030. Ending Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome (AIDS) by 2030 was also formulated as one of the Sustainable Development Goals and subsequently included and elaborated in the Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS (UNAIDS) strategy. People who inject drugs (PWID) are among the most vulnerable groups in terms of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. Following the objectives of the WHO and the UN, the German Federal Ministry of Health (BMG) has presented the first integrated overall strategy for HIV and Hepatitis C (as well as Hepatitis B and other sexually transmitted infections).

OBJECTIVES AND METHODS

Six years after the adoption of the German government's BIS 2030 strategy this article discusses the role of PWID in Germany in relation to the elimination targets on HIV and HCV based on currently available data and in light of recent responses and efforts from the field.

RESULTS

Although there are multiple positive practice approaches, the WHO elimination targets have not yet been achieved with regard to HCV and HIV in PWID.

CONCLUSION

In order not to fail the elimination targets 2030, Germany will have to substantially improve the situation of PWID as a key group and in particular advance the implementation of diagnostics and treatment as well as evidence-based harm reduction measures.

Seroprevalence and factors associated with hepatitis B virus exposure in the incarcerated population from southern Brazil

Hepatitis B viral infection (HBV) in prisons poses serious public health challenges because it significantly contributes to the increase in both morbidity and mortality indicators worldwide. Research has shown high HBV prevalence among inmates when compared to the general population. In this study, we estimated the prevalence of HBV exposure and its risk factors among 1,132 inmates detained in high security institutions. A cross-sectional, epidemiological study was carried out in 11 male-only prisons in the State of Paraná, Brazil, between May 2015 to December 2016. HBV exposure was explored using a variety of methods, including HBsAg, anti-HBs, and total anti-HBc. Data were analyzed using univariate and multivariate techniques. The overall prevalence of HBV exposure was 11.9% (95% CI: 10.9-12.8), totaling 135 individuals. In the multivariate analyses, risk factors that remained statistically significant were related to the penitentiary location (Francisco Beltrão; OR = 5.59; 95% CI: 3.32-9.42), age (over 30 years; OR = 5.78; 95% CI: 3.58-9.34), undergoing tattooing procedures in prison (OR = 1.64; 95% CI: 1.03-2.60), self-reported sexual activities with a known drug user (OR = 1.67; 95% CI: 1.12-2.48) and having a history of previous history of hepatitis B or C infection (OR = 2.62; 95% CI: 1.48-4.64). The findings indicate that public policies-including vaccination, early diagnosis, harm reduction strategies, and adequate treatment-should be designed and delivered in the same way for both the incarcerated and the general population in order to reduce the prevalence of HBV and its associated consequences.

Epidemiological trends of HBV and HDV coinfection among Viennese HIV+ patients

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Despite vaccination recommendations, hepatitis B (HBV) and D (HDV) coinfections are common in HIV+individuals.

METHODS

HBV immunization status (anti-HBs) as well as HBV (HBsAg/HBV-DNA) and HDV (anti-HDV) coinfection rates were assessed in 1870 HIV+individuals at HIV diagnosis (baseline, BL) and last follow-up (FU).

RESULTS

Sixty-eight (3.6%) HIV patients were never tested for HBV. At BL, 89/1802 (4.9%) HIV patients were HBV coinfected. Four hundred and fifteen (23.0%) showed virological HBV clearance [HBsAg(-)/anti-HBc(+)/anti-HBs(+)] and 210 (11.7%) presented with anti-HBc(+) only. Seven hundred and ten (39.4%) were HBV naïve [HBsAg(-)/anti-HBs(-)/anti-HBc(-)/HBV-DNA(-)], but only 378 (21.0%) received vaccinations with detectable anti-HBs(+) titres. Among the 89 HBV/HIV-coinfected patients, only 52 (58.4%) were tested for HDV: 11/49 (22.4%) had anti-HDV(+) and 3/12 (25.0%) showed HDV-RNA viraemia. During a median FU of 6.5 (IQR 7.2) years, 44 (4.6%) of the 953 retested BL HBV-negative patients acquired new HBV infection (including 15/304, 4.9% of vaccinated patients). Of the 89 patients, 22 (24.7%) patients cleared their HBsAg, resulting in 60/1625 (3.7%) HIV/HBV individuals at FU: 34 (56.7%) showed HBV-DNA suppression and 15 (25.0%) were HBV viraemic, while 12/89 (13.5%) remained without a FU test. Vaccinations induced anti-HBs(+) in 137 of the retested 649 (21.1%) BL HBV-naïve patients.

CONCLUSION

HBV testing is well established among Viennese HIV+patients with HBV coinfection rates around 4%-5%. HBV vaccinations are insufficiently implemented since anti-HBs titres were detected in only 21.1% of HBV-naive HIV(+) patients and new HBV infections occurred in previously vaccinated patients. HDV testing is not systematically performed despite up to 25% of HIV/HBV patients may show HDV coinfection.

Hepatitis B vaccination coverage in Germany: systematic review

BACKGROUND

Despite being considered as a low prevalence country for hepatitis B (HBV), some populations in Germany are at higher risk of infection. In the context of the World Health Organization's (WHO) viral hepatitis elimination goals, a valid epidemiological data base is needed to plan and monitor the national response. Prevention strategies include general and targeted HBV vaccination programmes.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this work was to estimate the HBV vaccination coverage (VC) in the general population (GP) and different population groups in Germany from available evidence and to identify current evidence gaps for future research.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic review on HBV VC in the general population and populations at high risk of HBV exposure or severe infection in Germany. We included eligible publications (01/01/2017 to 06/06/2020) from databases Embase, Pubmed and Livivo, from a previous scoping review (including data published 01/01/2005-17/03/2017), from the national surveillance system and screened the reference lists of all publications at full text level. Risk of bias was assessed using the Hoy et al. tool.

RESULTS

We included 68 publications of 67 studies and assigned them to one or more suitable population groups. Twenty-one studies contained data among children/adolescents and three among adults from the GP (VC 65.8-90.5% and 22.9-52.1%, respectively), one among travelers (VC 89.0%), 13 among immunocompromised populations (VC 7.8-89.0%), 16 among populations with occupational risk and 16 with non-occupational risk of HBV exposure (VC 63.6-96.5% and 4.4-84.5%, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Comprehensive evidence at low risk of bias was identified for children/adolescents. However, 25 years after including HBV in the national immunisation schedule, VC in Germany is still below the 95%-goal defined by WHO. For people at occupational risk of HBV exposure, VC was mostly reported to be over the WHO goal of 80%, but quality of evidence was heterogenous and should be improved. For people at non-occupational risk of HBV exposure, evidence was sparse and of low quality. The low VC highlights the need for future research to plan vaccination programmes targeting these populations.

Blood markers of endothelial dysfunction and their correlation to cerebrovascular reactivity in patients with chronic hepatitis C infection

Although liver cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma are major consequences of hepatitis C (HCV), there has been an increasing number of studies examining extrahepatic manifestations, especially those caused by systemic chronic inflammation and metabolic complications that might predispose HCV patients to atherosclerosis and ischemic cerebrovascular disease (CVD). The aim of our study was to assess E-selectin, VCAM-1, ICAM-1 and VEGF-A serum levels in patients with chronic HCV infection and to correlate them with cerebrovascular reactivity. A blood sample was taken from eighteen patients with chronic hepatitis C infection and from the same number of healthy blood donors in the control group. The aim was to analyse markers of endothelial dysfunction and to correlate them with cerebrovascular reactivity expressed as breath-holding index (BHI) determined using transcranial color Doppler. The obtained results revealed significant differences between the groups in all endothelial markers except for the E selectin. While the ICAM-1 and sVCAM-1 were significantly increased in the hepatitis group, VEGF-A was significantly decreased. A significant reduction of 0.5 (95% CI 0.2, 0.8) in the mean BHI was found in the hepatitis group (mean BHI 0.64) compared to controls (mean BHI 1.10). No significant association between the BHI and any of the endothelial markers was found in the control group, while in the hepatitis group, the scatter plot of ICAM-1 vs BHI suggested that the association might be present. In conclusion, the results of this study confirm an association between a chronic HCV infection and altered cerebrovascular reactivity as well as higher levels of markers of endothelial activation (ICAM-1, VCAM-1) as possible indicators of an increased CVD risk.

[How to assess the elimination of viral hepatitis B, C, and D in Germany? Outcomes of an interdisciplinary workshop]

BACKGROUND

In 2016, the World Health Organization (WHO) released a strategy to eliminate hepatitis B, C, and D and defined indicators to monitor the progress. The Robert Koch Institute organized an interdisciplinary working meeting in 2019 to identify data sources and gaps.

OBJECTIVES

The objectives were to network, to create an overview of the data sources available in Germany on hepatitis B and C, and to discuss how to construct indicators.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We extracted the WHO indicators relevant for Germany and determined how they can be constructed on the basis of available data. Stakeholders from public health services, clinics, laboratories, health insurance companies, research institutes, data holders, and registries attended a workshop and discussed methods of constructing the indicators for which data are lacking. Data sources and data were evaluated and prioritized with regard to their quality and completeness.

RESULTS

Indicators on prevalence, incidence, prevention, testing and diagnosis, treatment, cure, burden of sequelae, and mortality for the general population can be constructed using secondary data such as diagnosis, health service, and registry data, data from laboratories and hospitals as well as population-based studies. Data sources for vulnerable groups are limited to studies among drug users, men who have sex with men, and about HIV coinfected patients. Data for migrants, prisoners, and sex workers are largely lacking as well as data on burden of disease from chronic viral hepatitis in the general population.

CONCLUSIONS

We identified data sources, their limitations, and methods for construction for all selected indicators. The next step is to convert the ideas developed into concrete projects with individual stakeholders.

Prevalence of Hepatitis B, C, and D in Germany: Results From a Scoping Review

Background: One of the five strategic directions in the World Health Organization global health sector strategy on viral hepatitis 2016-2021 is to generate strong strategic information for focused action to understand the viral hepatitis epidemic and focus the response. Knowledge of national prevalence is a cornerstone of strategic information. Germany is considered to be a low prevalence country for viral hepatitis B, C, and D, however the prevalence is likely to be higher among at-risk groups. Methods: The aim of this work was to give a detailed overview of the prevalence of viral hepatitis B (HBsAg, anti-HBc), C (anti-HCV, HCV RNA), and D (anti-HDV, HDV RNA) in different population groups in Germany. Therefore, we analyzed the results of a comprehensive literature search on various aspects of the epidemiological situation of hepatitis B, C, and D in Germany. Eligible publications including information on hepatitis B, C, and D prevalence were extracted from the overall spreadsheet table and summarized and analyzed based on virus and different population groups. A quality appraisal was performed using a checklist developed by Hoy et al. to assess risk of bias in prevalence studies. Results: Overall, 51 publications were identified through the literature search. The overall prevalence of HBsAg in the general (and proxy) population ranged from 0.3 to 1.6%. Among at-risk groups, including clinical populations and health care workers, the HBsAg prevalence ranged from 0.2% (among rheumatic patients) to 4.5% among HIV positive patients. The overall prevalence of anti-HCV in the general (and proxy) population ranged from 0.2 to 1.9%. Among at-risk groups, including clinical populations and health care workers, the anti-HCV prevalence ranged from 0.04% (among health care workers) to 68.0% among people who inject drugs. Conclusions: The hepatitis B and C prevalence in the general population in Germany is low. Prevalence is high to very high among at-risk populations, however for some groups evidence was incomplete or missing completely. To reach the elimination goals in Germany and implement a targeted response, more research among at-risk groups is needed.