Subsequent MRI of pediatric patients after an adverse reaction to Gadolinium-based contrast agents

Acute adverse reactions after multiple initially well-tolerated gadolinium-based contrast-enhanced abdomen MRIs in pediatric patients

PURPOSE

Repeated gadolinium-based contrast agent (GBCA)-enhanced MRIs are crucial in the diagnosis and follow-up of oncologic and chronic disorders in pediatric patients. The aim of the study was to evaluate the frequency and severity of adverse reactions to GBCAs in children after a single vs. multiple GBCA-enhanced abdomen MRIs.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

All pediatric patients with at least one GBCA-enhanced abdominal MRI between 2009 and 2020 were retrospectively evaluated based on adverse reactions reports, according to the classification system of the American College of Radiology and guidelines on contrast agents of the European Society of Urogenital Radiology. A Student´s t-test analysis, a spearman ρ-correlation and a Chi-square test between the reported adverse reactions and the total number of GBCA applications, and the number of each applied GBCA was calculated. A p-value <0.05 was considered significant.

RESULTS

Of 623 patients with 964 GBCA-enhanced abdomen MRIs, there were 464 patients with only one and 159 patients with multiple GBCA administrations. Of 964 GBCA doses administrated, two cases with urticaria (mild allergy-like adverse reaction) and one case with vomiting (mild chemotoxic adverse reaction) were recorded (3/964 = 0.31%), but all the reports were in patients with multiple GBCA administration (3/159 = 1.89%). No adverse reactions in patients with a single GBCA administration were observed. The reported adverse reactions correlated significantly with the total number of GBCAs (p<0.001) and the number of each GBCA (p<0.001 or p = 0.002). The independent two-tailed t-tests, and the chi-square test were significant (p<0.001, p = 0.003).

CONCLUSION

GBCA-associated adverse reactions are rare and mostly mild, but initially well-tolerated GBCA could cause adverse reactions due to the increase likelihood of drug hypersensitivity upon repeated GBCA exposure.

A five-year-old boy with anaphylaxis reaction to gadolinium-based MR contrast medium: a case report

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is one of the most widely used tests in orthopedic areas. Gadolinium-based magnetic resonance (MR) contrast media are commonly used for MRI tests. They are known to be safe with little side effects and low incidence of acute adverse reactions. Although not common, immediate hypersensitivity reaction can occur in some patients after administration of gadolinium-based MR contrast media, causing skin rash, vascular edema, dyspnea, abdominal pain, hypotension, altered mental status, cardiopulmonary arrest, and even death. During a knee joint MRI test in a 5-year-old boy, anaphylaxis, a serious symptom, occured after injecting gadolinium-based MR contrast medium. Here we report this case along with a literature review.

Safety of Gadoxetate Disodium for Hepatobiliary MRI in Children and Adolescents

Background Despite a proven role in the characterization of liver lesions, use of the gadolinium-based contrast agent (GBCA) gadoxetate disodium at MRI is limited in children due to a lack of comparative safety data. Purpose To evaluate the safety of the GBCA gadoxetate disodium (a linear ionic hepatobiliary contrast agent [HBA]) in children and adolescents, compared with extracellular contrast agents (ECA). Materials and Methods A retrospective analysis was conducted in children and adolescents aged 18 years or younger who underwent HBA-enhanced MRI at one of three tertiary hospitals from January 2010 to December 2022. The incidence of GBCA-associated acute adverse events was compared between MRI examinations with a HBA and those with ECA. Severity was categorized according to American College of Radiology guidelines (mild, moderate, or severe). (a) Propensity score matching using multivariable logistic regression models and (b) inverse probability of treatment weighting analysis based on nine covariates (age, sex, asthma, allergic rhinitis, chronic urticaria or atopy, food allergy, drug allergy, premedication, and history of GBCA-associated adverse events) were used for confounder adjustment. Results A total of 1629 MRI examinations (ECA, n = 1256; HBA, n = 373) in 1079 patients were included (mean age, 8.6 years ± 6.5; 566 girls). The per-examination incidence of GBCA-associated acute adverse events showed no evidence of a difference, with rates of 0.9% (11 of 1256 examinations) for ECA and 1.3% (five of 373 examinations) for HBA (odds ratio [OR], 1.55 [95% CI: 0.54, 4.46]; P = .42). Acute adverse events were all mild with ECA, whereas with HBA, they were mild for four patients and moderate for one patient. There was no evidence of a difference in the incidence of acute adverse events, even in propensity score matching (OR, 1.33 [95% CI: 0.30, 5.96]; P = .71) and inverse probability of treatment weighting analysis (OR, 0.84 [95% CI: 0.25, 2.86]; P = .78). Conclusion Gadoxetate disodium showed no difference in acute adverse events compared with ECA in children and adolescents, with further large-scale pediatric studies required to confirm its safety. © RSNA, 2024 Supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Otero in this issue.

Gadolinium contrast agents- challenges and opportunities of a multidisciplinary approach: Literature review

Contrast agents is used in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to improve the visibility of the details of the organ structures. Gadolinium-based contrast agent (GBCA) has been used since 1988 in MRI for diagnostic and follow-up of patients, the gadolinium good properties make it an effective choice for enhance the signal in MRI by increase its intensity and shortening the relaxation time of the proton. Recently, many studies show a gadolinium deposition in different human organs due to release of free gadolinium various body organs or tissue, which led to increased concern about the use of gadolinium agents, in this study, the potential diseases that may affect the patient and side effects that appear on the patient and related to accumulation of gadolinium were clarified, the study focused on the organs such as brain and bones in which gadolinium deposition was found and the lesions associated with it, and the diseases associated with gadolinium retention includes Nephrogenic Systemic Fibrosis (NSF) and Gadolinium deposition disease (GDD). Some studies tended to improve the contrast agents by developing a new non-gadolinium agents or development of next-generation gadolinium agents. In this review article the latest knowledge about MRI contrast agent.

Reliability of signal intensity in the basal ganglia on non-contrast T1-weighted MR scans after repetitive application of a gadolinium-based contrast agent in pediatric neuro-oncology patients

PURPOSE

To evaluate the reliability of signal intensity (SI) changes in the basal ganglia as a supposed indicator of gadolinium deposition in the brain after repetitive application of gadolinium-based contrast agents (GBCAs) in a pediatric neuro-oncological collective.

METHODS

One hundred and eight neuropediatric patients (54 male, 54 female, 0-17 years old), with repetitive GBCA-enhanced cranial MRIs between 2003 and 2017, were retrospectively analyzed. Two radiologists measured SI in the nucleus dentatus (ND), globus pallidus (GP), thalamus (T), and the pons (P). The NDP and GPT ratio were calculated. An intraclass correlation coefficient, and multiple linear regressions with subsequent stepwise backward variable selection were performed to evaluate the influence of gender, patient's age at the first MRI, time interval between the first and last MRI, linear or macrocyclic GBCAs, residual pathology, treatments, and magnet field strengths.

RESULTS

The inter-reader agreement was good for GPT and NDP in the whole collective (ICC = 0.837 and ICC = 0.793) and for children >2 years of age (ICC = 0.874 and ICC = 0.790), but poor to moderate for children ≤2 years of age (ICC = 0.397 and ICC = 0.748). The intra-reader agreement was good (ICC = 0.910 and ICC = 0.882). An SI increase was only observed for both readers in GPT (p = 0.003, or p < 0.001). None of the considered cofactors showed a consistent effect on SI changes for either readers or regions.

CONCLUSION

Measurements of SI changes in the basal ganglia are not a reliable parameter with which to evaluate or estimate gadolinium deposition in the brain or to identify suspicious influential factors after repeated GBCA applications.

Hypersensitivity to gadolinium-based contrast

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The use of contrast media is increasing in recent decades. Although gadolinium-based contrast agents (GBCAs) are generally well tolerated, adverse reactions, including hypersensitivity reactions (HSRs), although infrequent, may occur. It is important to perform a thorough allergological evaluation in patients with suspected GBCA-HSRs to avoid potentially serious reactions in subsequent exposures.

RECENT FINDINGS

Data on GBCA-HSRs are scarce. Most published articles dealing with skin tests and drug provocation tests (DPTs) with GBCAs are case series and small cohorts. Controversies exist about the role of premedication for preventing HSRs on subsequent exposures. Selection of well tolerated alternatives is based on potential cross-reactivity among GBCAs; however, the extent of cross-reactivity among them remains unclear.

SUMMARY

As premedication is not useful because breakthrough reactions are frequent in patients with GBCA-HSRs in subsequent exposures, an allergological evaluation is required. Available data suggest a high negative predictive value of skin tests, being crucial for guiding the selection of an alternative GBCA. However, DPTs are still necessary to confirm or exclude the diagnosis or find alternative GBCAs. Cross-reactivity is high among GBCAs belonging from the same group, mainly among macrocyclic compounds, so this must be taken into account for selecting alternatives.

A case report of gadopentetate dimeglumine-induced cardiac arrest: Resuscitation using extracorporeal membrane oxygenation

Gadopentetate dimeglumine (Gd-DTPA) is commonly used for enhancement in magnetic resonance imaging, but rarely causes serious adverse reactions. The patient presented in this report had a cardiac arrest and multiple organ dysfunction syndrome within a short time after administration of Gd-DTPA. Immediately after receiving an intravenous injection of Gd-DTPA, the patient felt nausea and chest tightness, and developed systemic erythema. He was successfully treated using veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) combined with continuous renal replacement therapy without any serious complications or neurological deficits. We report a patient who was successfully treated for Gd-DTPA-induced cardiac arrest with ECMO. Thus, ECMO may be an effective treatment for cardiac arrest secondary to anaphylaxis.

Hypersensitivity to Gadolinium-Based Contrast Media

Gadolinium-based contrast agents (GBCAs) are frequently used in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) examinations to increase sensitivity in diagnoses. Recently, an increase in the description of hypersensitivity reactions to GBCAs has been detected. We performed research in PubMed, PubMed, SCOPUS, and EMBASE until September 2021, searching for studies regarding immediate and delayed hypersensitivity reactions to gadolinium-based contrast agents in which an allergy study was performed. The initial research identified 149 articles written in English. After excluding articles duplicated and articles that had irrelevant designs, 26 articles were included. Finally, 17 studies concerning immediate reactions, six studies concerning non-immediate reactions, and three concerning both that performed allergy evaluations were selected. In the review, we analyzed the characteristics of immediate and delayed reactions and the results of the allergy study and cross-reactivity. Skin tests seem to have acceptable accuracy, but drug provocation tests are still needed when skin tests are negative o to find alternative agents. Although cross-reactivity patterns are not well established, cross-reactivity seems to exist among macrocyclic agents. Notwithstanding, the number of patients analyzed is low and further studies are required. A management algorithm is suggested.