The effect of a severe psychiatric illness on colorectal cancer treatment and survival: A population-based retrospective cohort study

Mental illness and non-metastatic colorectal cancer treatment and survival, a nationwide study of almost 70,000 patients

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

The impact of mental illness on treatment and outcomes for patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) has not been investigated with potential confounders and mediators accounted for.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Colorectal Cancer Database (CRCBaSe), a linked national registry database, was used to analyse stage I-III CRC patients diagnosed in Sweden between 2008 and 2021. The exposure of interest was a history of mental illness. Treatment outcomes were analysed with logistic regressions. Flexible parametric models were fitted for survival analysis. Analyses were adjusted for pre-specified confounders.

RESULTS

Patients with a history of severe mental illness presented with more advanced tumours and comorbidities. They were more likely to undergo emergency surgery (OR 1.56, 95% CI 1.32-1.84) and less likely to receive adjuvant treatment (OR 0.65, 95% CI 0.53-0.80) than patients with no history of mental illness. Five-year standardised overall survival (OS) was worse for those with a history of mild and severe mental illness, 64.6% (95%CI 63.9-65.3) and 61.8% (95%CI 59.7-63.8) compared to those without 69.3% (95%CI 68.9-69.7). Although time to recurrence was not significantly impacted, standardised survival after recurrence was worse for patients with a history of severe mental illness, with a 3-year survival after recurrence of 24% compared to 30% in those without a history of mental illness.

INTERPRETATION

Although the differences were smaller compared to previous studies, patients with a history of mental illnesses still do worse. The management of CRC patients with psychiatric comorbidities presents complex challenges necessitating personalised solutions.

Colorectal cancer mortality in persons with severe mental illness: a scoping review with meta-analyses of observational studies

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Persons with severe mental illnesses (SMIs) have reduced participation in colorectal cancer (CRC) screening programs, higher odds of advanced stage at diagnosis, and are less likely to receive adequate treatment than the general population. It remains unclear to what extent these factors impact CRC outcomes for persons with SMI. The aim of this scoping review was to describe and quantify CRC mortality for persons with SMI compared with the general population.

PATIENTS/MATERIALS AND METHODS

We followed the JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis and PRISMA guidelines in a systematic search of four databases from inception until April 29th, 2024. We included studies that provided CRC mortality estimates for adults with preexisting clinical diagnosis of SMI. We synthesized the results descriptively and pooled the data to estimate the magnitude of the associations.

RESULTS

Twenty-four original studies were identified with a total of 16.4 million persons. Most studies reported increased CRC mortality for persons with SMI compared with persons without SMI. The meta-analysis demonstrated a 25% increased CRC mortality for persons with SMI (e.g. pooled hazard ratio 1.25; 95% confidence interval 1.13 to 1.39; n = 13,178,161).

INTERPRETATION

The evidence points consistently to an increased CRC mortality for persons with SMI compared with persons without SMI. Furthermore, this evidence supports the idea that persons with SMI are a heterogenous population, and as such, any future initiatives to improve CRC outcomes for persons with SMI would warrant a tailored approach to potentiate individual resources, to mitigate stigma and structural discrimination.

Inequities in the Time to Colon Cancer Diagnosis Among Individuals With Severe Psychiatric Illness

INTRODUCTION

Early colon cancer detection is critical for improving outcomes. The diagnostic interval is a useful approach to conceptualizing time-to-diagnosis within the healthcare system and understanding the diagnostic journey. Adults with severe psychiatric illness (SPI) are less likely to participate in cancer screening and more likely to be diagnosed with advanced cancers. We investigated the association between having an SPI and the colon cancer diagnostic interval.

METHODS

We conducted a cross-sectional study of adults diagnosed with colon cancer in Ontario, Canada between 2007 and 2019 using administrative health data. Individuals with healthcare encounters consistent with pre-existing major depression, schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, or other non-organic psychotic illnesses were considered as having SPI. Individuals with an SPI-related hospitalization were categorized as having an inpatient SPI; the rest were considered outpatient. We calculated the diagnostic interval as the number of days from first colon cancer-related healthcare encounter to cancer diagnosis. Diagnostic pathways were assessed descriptively, including whether diagnosis was made symptomatically or with no symptom recorded. Quantile regression (stratified by symptom status) was used to quantify the association between SPI status and the diagnostic interval.

RESULTS

We identified 42,143 individuals with colon cancer: 40,884 with no history of mental illness, 835 with a history of outpatient SPI, and 424 with inpatient SPI. Adults with SPI were significantly more likely to be diagnosed symptomatically (inpatient: 89.9%, outpatient: 86.6%, no SPI: 80.9%, p < 0.001). Individuals with SPI experienced a significantly longer median symptomatic diagnostic interval and a similar median diagnostic interval when diagnosed with no symptom recorded, relative to those without a history of mental illness. After adjusting for covariates, the median symptomatic diagnostic interval was 48 days longer (95% CI 28, 68) among individuals with outpatient SPI and 55 days longer (95% CI 28, 82) among individuals with inpatient SPI compared to those with no SPI.

CONCLUSION

Individuals with SPI were more likely to be diagnosed symptomatically and had longer symptomatic diagnostic intervals than those without. This study represents a first step in targeting and improving cancer diagnostic processes for individuals with SPI.

Treatment and Mortality Following Cancer Diagnosis Among People With Non-affective Psychotic Disorders in Ontario, Canada: A Retrospective Cohort Study

BACKGROUND AND HYPOTHESIS

People with psychotic disorders have a higher risk of mortality following cancer diagnosis, compared to people without psychosis. The extent to which this disparity is influenced by differences in cancer-related treatment is currently unknown. We hypothesized that, following a cancer diagnosis, people with psychotic disorders were less likely to receive treatment and were at higher risk of death than those without psychosis.

STUDY DESIGN

We constructed a retrospective cohort of cases of non-affective psychotic disorder (NAPD) and a general population comparison group, using Ontario Health (OH) administrative data. We identified cases of all cancers diagnosed between 1995 and 2019 and obtained information on cancer-related treatment and mortality. Cox proportional hazards models were used to compare the probability of having a consultation with an oncologist and receiving cancer-related treatment, adjusting for tumor site and stage. We also compared the rate of all-cause and cancer-related mortality between the two groups, adjusting for tumor site.

STUDY RESULTS

Our analytic sample included 24 944 people diagnosed with any cancer. People with NAPD were less likely to receive treatment than people without psychosis (HR = 0.87, 95% CI = 0.82, 0.91). In addition, people with NAPD had a greater risk of death from any cause (HR = 1.68, 95% CI = 1.60, 1.76), compared to people without NAPD.

CONCLUSIONS

The lower likelihood of receiving cancer treatment reflects disparities in accessing cancer care for people with psychotic disorders, which may partially explain the higher mortality risk following cancer diagnosis. Future research should explore mediating factors in this relationship to identify targets for reducing health disparities.

Rates of colorectal cancer diagnosis and mortality in people with severe mental illness: results from Australia's National Bowel Cancer Screening Programme

AIMS

Studies show that people with severe mental illness (SMI) have a greater risk of dying from colorectal cancer (CRC). These studies mostly predate the introduction of national bowel cancer screening programmes (NBCSPs) and it is unknown if these have reduced disparity in CRC-related mortality for people with SMI.

METHODS

We compared mortality rates following CRC diagnosis at colonoscopy between a nationally representative sample of people with and without SMI who participated in Australia's NBCSP. Participation was defined as the return of a valid immunochemical faecal occult blood test (iFOBT). We also compared mortality rates between people with SMI who did and did not participate in the NBCSP. SMI was defined as receiving two or more Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme prescriptions for second-generation antipsychotics or lithium.

RESULTS

Amongst NBCSP participants, the incidence of CRC in the SMI cohort was lower than in the controls (hazard ratio [HR] 0.77, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.61-0.98). In spite of this, their all-cause mortality rate was 1.84 times higher (95% CI 1.12-3.03), although there was only weak evidence of a difference in CRC-specific mortality (HR 1.82; 95% CI 0.93-3.57). People with SMI who participated in the NBCSP had better all-cause survival than those who were invited to participate but did not return a valid iFOBT (HR 0.67, 95% CI 0.50-0.88). The benefit of participation was strongest for males with SMI and included improved all-cause and CRC-specific survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Participation in the NBCSP may be associated with improved survival following a CRC diagnosis for people with SMI, especially males, although they still experienced greater mortality than the general population. Approaches to improving CRC outcomes in people with SMI should include targeted screening, and increased awareness about the benefits or participation.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (Trial ID: ACTRN12620000781943).

Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and colorectal cancer: a two-sample bidirectional Mendelian randomization analysis

OBJECTIVE

Observational studies suggest a connection between nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and colorectal cancer (CRC) risk. It, however, remains unclear whether such a connection is causal. This study aims to examine the association between NAFLD and CRC using a two-sample bidirectional Mendelian randomization (MR) method.

METHODS

Summary statistics for NAFLD were obtained from four genome-wide association studies, including 8434 cases and 770 180 controls. Meanwhile, CRC and controls (1803 vs. 174 006) were collected from the FinnGen. The inverse variance weighted (IVW) method was used primarily, while sensitivity analyses were conducted via the weighted median, MR Egger method, simple mode, and weighted mode to enhance result reliability.

RESULTS

We found a positive correlation between NAFLD and CRC by IVW method in the forward MR analysis (odds ratio = 1.270, 95% confidence interval: 1.154-1.398, P = 1.092 × 10-6). Inverse MR analysis, however, suggested that CRC may not have a causal effect on NAFLD. Besides, we observed an absence of horizontal pleiotropy and heterogeneity in this MR analysis.

CONCLUSION

Our forward MR study found that NAFLD may increase CRC risk. In contrast, CRC may not have a causal relationship with NAFLD. This study provides genetic evidence supporting a cause-and-effect association between NAFLD and CRC.

Cancer characteristics in patients with schizophrenia: a 25-year retrospective analysis

Schizophrenia is associated with higher cancer-related mortality, perhaps due to delayed diagnosis and limited access to treatment. The study aimed to compare patients diagnosed with cancer with and without schizophrenia to determine whether these groups differ in terms of oncological variables and survival outcomes. This was a retrospective, observational cohort study that included 30.990 patients diagnosed with cancer between 1997 and 2021. We performed univariate and bivariate analyses for the sociodemographic and clinical variables, and constructed Kaplan-Meier survival curves and used the log-rank test to perform the comparisons. All variables were compared for each cancer type. One hundred and sixty-two (0.52 %) patients had a confirmed diagnosis of schizophrenia (ICD-9 criteria). The mean age at diagnosis was significantly lower in the schizophrenia group. A significantly higher proportion of the schizophrenia group was diagnosed with cancer through the emergency department and a lower percentage through scheduled appointments. A smaller percentage of patients in the schizophrenia group received radical treatment for cancer. The mortality rate was higher in the schizophrenia group and median survival was lower. These findings suggest that cancer patients with schizophrenia have worse outcomes than patients without schizophrenia in terms of oncological variables and survival.

Application of fecal immunochemical test in colorectal cancer screening: A community-based, cross-sectional study in average-risk individuals in Hainan

BACKGROUND

The incidence of colorectal cancer (CRC) in China is steadily rising, with a high proportion of advanced-stage diagnoses. This highlights the significance of early detection and prevention measures to enhance survival rates. Fecal immunochemical testing (FIT) is a globally recommended CRC screening method; however, limited research has been conducted on its application in Hainan.

AIM

To assess the efficacy and adherence of FIT screening among average-risk individuals in Hainan, while also examining the risk factors associated with positive FIT results.

METHODS

This population-based cross-sectional study implemented FIT screening for CRC in 2000 asymptomatic participants aged 40-75 years from five cities and 21 community health centers in Hainan Province. The study was conducted from August 2022 to April 2023, employing a stratified sampling method to select participants. Individuals with positive FIT results subsequently underwent colonoscopy. Positive predictive values for confirmed CRC and advanced adenoma were calculated, and the relationship between relevant variables and positive FIT results was analyzed using χ 2 tests and multivariate logistic regression.

RESULTS

A total of 1788 participants completed the FIT screening, with a median age of 57 years (interquartile range: 40-75). Among them, 503 (28.1%) were males, and 1285 (71.9%) were females, resulting in an 89.4% compliance rate for FIT screening. The overall positivity rate of FIT was 4.4% [79 out of 1788; 95% confidence interval (CI): 3%-5%]. The specific positivity rates for Haikou, Sanya, Orient City, Qionghai City, and Wuzhishan City were 9.6% (45 of 468; 95%CI: 8%-11%), 1.3% (6 of 445; 95%CI: 0.1%-3.1%), 2.7% (8 of 293; 95%CI: 1.2%-4.3%), 3.3% (9 of 276; 95%CI: 1.0%-6.3%), and 4.2% (11 of 406; 95%CI: 1.2%-7.3%), respectively. Significant associations were found between age, dietary habits, and positive FIT results. Out of the 79 participants with positive FIT results, 55 underwent colonoscopy, demonstrating an 82.2% compliance rate. Among them, 10 had a clean gastrointestinal tract, 43 had polyps or adenomas, and 2 were confirmed to have CRC, yielding a positive predictive value of 3.6% (95%CI: 0.9%-4.2%). Among the 43 participants with polyps or adenomas, 8 were diagnosed with advanced adenomas, resulting in an advanced adenoma rate of 14.5% (95%CI: 10.1%-17.7%).

CONCLUSION

In the Hainan region, FIT screening for CRC among asymptomatic individuals at average risk is feasible and well-received.

Secondary Stroke Prevention in People With Schizophrenia

BACKGROUND

People with schizophrenia are less likely than those without to be treated for cardiovascular disease. We aimed to evaluate the association between schizophrenia and secondary preventive care after ischemic stroke.

METHODS AND RESULTS

In this retrospective cohort study, we used linked population-based administrative data to identify adults who survived 1 year after ischemic stroke hospitalization in Ontario, Canada between 2004 and 2017. Outcomes were screening, treatment, and control of risk factors, and receipt of outpatient physician services. We used modified Poisson regression to model the relative risk of each outcome among people with and without schizophrenia, adjusting for age and other factors. Among 81 163 people with ischemic stroke, 844 (1.04%) had schizophrenia. Schizophrenia was associated with lower rates of screening for hyperlipidemia (60.5% versus 66.0%, adjusted relative risk [aRR] 0.88 [95% CI, 0.84-0.93]) and diabetes (69.4% versus 73.9%, aRR 0.93 [95% CI, 0.89-0.97]), prescription of antihypertensive medications (91.2% versus 94.7%, aRR 0.96 [95% CI, 0.93-0.99]), achievement of target lipid levels (low-density lipoprotein <2 mmol/L) (30.6% versus 34.6%, aRR 0.86 [95% CI, 0.78-0.96]), and outpatient specialist visits (55.3% versus 67.8%, aRR 0.78 [95% CI, 0.74-0.83]) or primary care physician visits (94.5% versus 98.5%; aRR 0.96 [95% CI, 0.95-0.98]) within 1 year. There were no differences in prescription of antilipemic, antiglycemic, or anticoagulant medications, or in achievement of target hemoglobin A1c ≤7%.

CONCLUSIONS

People with stroke and schizophrenia are less likely than those without to receive secondary preventive care. This may inform interventions to improve poststroke care and outcomes in those with schizophrenia.

The double burden of severe mental illness and cancer: a population-based study on colorectal cancer care pathways from screening to end-of-life care

AIMS

Cancer is one of the main causes of death in persons with severe mental illness (SMI). Although their cancer incidence is similar, or sometimes even potentially lower compared to the general population, their cancer mortality remains higher. The role of healthcare provision and care equity in this mortality is increasingly being addressed in research, but available studies are limited in their scope. In this context, our aim was to compare colorectal cancer (CRC) care pathways from screening to end-of-life care in patients with and without pre-existing SMI on a national scale.

METHODS

This research leverages real-world data from the French national health claims database, covering the entire population, to assess cancer screening, diagnosis, treatment and post-treatment follow-up as well as quality of care (QOC) pathways among patients with incident CRC in 2015-2018, considering whether they had pre-existing SMI. We matched patients with SMI with three patients without - on age, sex, region of residence, year of cancer incidence and cancer type and location at presentation - as well as nationally established quality of CRC care indicators and regression models adjusting for relevant socio-economic, clinical and care provider-related covariates.

RESULTS

Among patients with incident CRC, 1,532 individuals with pre-existing SMI were matched with individuals without SMI. After adjusting for covariates, both colon and rectal cancer patients with SMI were less likely to participate in the national CRC screening programme and to receive advanced diagnostic examinations (e.g., colonoscopies and several complementary diagnostic examinations). They also had lower odds of receiving combined treatments (e.g., neoadjuvant chemotherapy, radiotherapy and excision) and of having access to targeted therapy or capecitabine but higher odds for invasive care (e.g., stoma). Colon cancer patients with SMI were also more likely to have no treatment at all, and rectal cancer patients with SMI were less likely to receive post-treatment follow-up. Suboptimal QOC was observed for both groups of patients, but to a higher extent for patients with SMI, with statistically significant differences for indicators focusing on diagnosis and post-treatment follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings reveal discrepancies across the care continuum of CRC between individuals with and without SMI and provide initial avenues on where to focus future efforts to address them, notably at the entry and exit stages of cancer care pathways, while calling for further research on the mechanisms preventing equity of physical healthcare for individuals with SMI.

Access to symptom screening and severe symptom risk among cancer patients with major mental illness

INTRODUCTION

Cancer symptom screening has the potential to improve cancer outcomes, including reducing symptom burden among patients with major mental illness (MMI). We determined rates of symptom screening with the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS-r) and risk of severe symptoms in cancer patients with MMI.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study used linked administrative health databases of adults diagnosed with cancer between 2007 and 2020. An MMI was measured in the 5 years prior to cancer diagnosis and categorized as inpatient, outpatient, or no MMI. Outcomes were defined as time to first ESAS-r screening and time to first moderate-to-severe symptom score. Cause-specific and Fine and Gray competing events models were used for both outcomes, controlling for age, sex, rural residence, year of diagnosis and cancer site.

RESULTS

Of 389,870 cancer patients, 4049 (1.0%) had an inpatient MMI and 9775 (2.5%) had an outpatient MMI. Individuals with inpatient MMI were least likely to complete an ESAS-r (67.5%) compared to those with outpatient MMI (72.3%) and without MMI (74.8%). Compared to those without MMI, individuals with an inpatient or outpatient MMI had a lower incidence of symptom screening records after accounting for the competing risk of death (subdistribution Hazard Ratio 0.77 (95% CI 0.74-0.80) and 0.88 (95% CI 0.86-0.90) respectively). Individuals with inpatient and outpatient MMI status consistently had a significantly higher risk of reporting high symptom scores across all symptoms.

CONCLUSIONS

Understanding the disparity in ESAS-r screening and management for cancer patients with MMI is a vital step toward providing equitable cancer care.

Dissecting the novel abilities of aripiprazole: The generation of anti-colorectal cancer effects by targeting Gαq via HTR2B

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a type of malignant tumor that seriously threatens human health and life, and its treatment has always been a difficulty and hotspot in research. Herein, this study for the first time reports that antipsychotic aripiprazole (Ari) against the proliferation of CRC cells both in vitro and in vivo, but with less damage in normal colon cells. Mechanistically, the results showed that 5-hydroxytryptamine 2B receptor (HTR2B) and its coupling protein G protein subunit alpha q (Gαq) were highly distributed in CRC cells. Ari had a strong affinity with HTR2B and inhibited HTR2B downstream signaling. Blockade of HTR2B signaling suppressed the growth of CRC cells, but HTR2B was not found to have independent anticancer activity. Interestingly, the binding of Gαq to HTR2B was decreased after Ari treatment. Knockdown of Gαq not only restricted CRC cell growth, but also directly affected the anti-CRC efficacy of Ari. Moreover, an interaction between Ari and Gαq was found in that the mutation at amino acid 190 of Gαq reduced the efficacy of Ari. Thus, these results confirm that Gαq coupled to HTR2B was a potential target of Ari in mediating CRC proliferation. Collectively, this study provides a novel effective strategy for CRC therapy and favorable evidence for promoting Ari as an anticancer agent.

Breast cancer treatment disparities in patients with severe mental illness: A systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

The incidence and mortality rates of breast cancer in individuals with pre-existing severe mental illness (SMI), such as schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, and major depression, are higher than in the general population. Reduced screening is one factor but there is less information on possible barriers to subsequent treatment following diagnosis.

METHODS

We undertook a systematic review and meta-analysis on access to guideline-appropriate care following a diagnosis of breast cancer in people with SMI including the receipt of surgery, endocrine, chemo- or radiotherapy. We searched for full-text articles indexed by PubMed, EMBASE, PsycInfo and CINAHL that compared breast cancer treatment in those with and without pre-existing SMI. Study designs included population-based cohort or case-control studies.

RESULTS

There were 13 studies included in the review, of which 4 contributed adjusted outcomes to the meta-analyses. People with SMI had a reduced likelihood of guideline-appropriate care (RR = 0.83, 95% CI = 0.77-0.90). Meta-analyses were not possible for the other outcomes but in adjusted results from a single study, people with SMI had longer wait-times to receiving guideline-appropriate care. The results for specific outcomes such as surgery, hormone, radio- or chemotherapy were mixed, possibly because results were largely unadjusted for age, comorbidities, or cancer stage.

CONCLUSIONS

People with SMI receive less and/or delayed guideline-appropriate care for breast cancer than the general population. The reasons for this disparity warrant further investigation, as does the extent to which differences in treatment access or quality contribute to excess breast cancer mortality in people with SMI.

The impact of a cancer diagnosis on nonfatal self-injury: a matched cohort study in Ontario

BACKGROUND

Psychological distress following a cancer diagnosis potentially increases the risk of intentional, nonfatal self-injury. The purpose of this work is to evaluate and compare rates of nonfatal self-injury among individuals in Ontario diagnosed with cancer against matched controls with no history of cancer.

METHODS

Adults in Ontario diagnosed with cancer from 2007 to 2019 were matched to 2 controls with no history of cancer, based on age and sex. We calculated the absolute and relative difference in rates of nonfatal self-injury in the 5 years before and after the index date (date of cancer diagnosis and dummy date for controls). We used crude difference-in-differences methods and adjusted Poisson regression-based analyses to examine whether the change in rates of nonfatal self-injury before and after index differed between cancer patients and controls.

RESULTS

The cohort included 803 740 people with cancer and 1 607 480 matched controls. In the first year after diagnosis, individuals with cancer had a 1.17-fold increase in rates of nonfatal self-injury (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.03-1.33) compared with matched controls, after accounting for pre-existing differences in rates of nonfatal self-injury and other clinical characteristics between the groups. Rates of nonfatal self-injury remained elevated in the cancer group by 1.07-fold for up to 5 years after diagnosis (95% CI 0.95-1.21).

INTERPRETATION

In this study, incidence of nonfatal self-injury was higher among individuals diagnosed with cancer, with the greatest impact observed in the first year after diagnosis. This work highlights the need for robust and accessible psychosocial oncology programs to support mental health along the cancer journey.

Impact of pre-existing mental health disorders on the receipt of guideline recommended cancer treatments: A systematic review

OBJECTIVE

Disparities in cancer outcomes for individuals with pre-existing mental health disorders have already been identified, particularly for cancer screening and mortality. We aimed to systematically review the influence on the time from cancer diagnosis to cancer treatment, treatment adherence, and differences in receipt of guideline recommended cancer treatment.

METHODS

We included international studies published in English from 1 January 1995 to 23 May 2022 by searching MEDLINE, Embase, and APA PsycInfo.

RESULTS

This review identified 29 studies with 27 being published in the past decade. Most studies focused on breast, non-small cell lung and colorectal cancer and were of high or medium quality as assessed by the Newcastle Ottawa Scale. All studies were from high-income countries, and mostly included patients enrolled in national health insurance systems. Five assessed the impact on treatment delay or adherence, and 25 focused on the receipt of guideline recommended treatment. 20/25 studies demonstrated evidence that patients with pre-existing mental health disorders were less likely to receive guideline recommended therapies such as surgery or radiotherapy. In addition, there was a greater likelihood of receiving less intensive or modified treatment including systemic therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Across different cancer types and treatment modalities there is evidence of a clear disparity in the receipt of guideline recommended cancer treatment for patients with pre-existing mental health disorders. The effect of pre-existing mental health disorders on treatment delay or adherence is under-researched. Future research needs to include low- and middle-income countries as well as qualitative investigations to understand the reasons for disparities in cancer treatment.

Health and healthcare equity within the Canadian cancer care sector: a rapid scoping review

BACKGROUND

Despite a publicly-funded healthcare system, alarming cancer-related health and healthcare inequities persist in Canada. However, it remains unclear how equity is being understood and taken up within the Canadian cancer context. Our objective was to identify how health and healthcare equity are being discussed as goals or aims within the cancer care sector in Canada.

METHODS

A rapid scoping review was conducted; five biomedical databases, 30 multidisciplinary websites, and Google were searched. We included English-language documents published between 2008 and 2021 that discussed health or healthcare equity in the Canadian cancer context.

RESULTS

Of 3860 identified documents, 83 were included for full-text analysis. The prevalence of published and grey equity-oriented literature has increased over time (2008-2014 [n = 20]; 2015-2021 [n = 62]). Only 25% of documents (n = 21) included a definition of health equity. Concepts such as inequity, inequality and disparity were frequently used interchangeably, resulting in conceptual muddling. Only 43% of documents (n = 36) included an explicit health equity goal. Although a suite of actions were described across the cancer control continuum to address equity goals, most were framed as recommendations rather than direct interventions.

CONCLUSION

Health and healthcare equity is a growing priority in the cancer care sector; however, conceptual clarity is needed to guide the development of robust equity goals, and the development of sustainable, measurable actions that redress inequities across the cancer control continuum. If we are to advance health and healthcare equity in the cancer care sector, a coordinated and integrated approach will be required to enact transformative and meaningful change.

Disparities in the medical expenditures of patients with cancer and concomitant mental disorder: analyzing the effects of diagnosis sequence order

BACKGROUND

Cancer is the leading cause of death in Taiwan. Medical expenditures related to cancer accounted for 44.8% of all major illness insurance claims in Taiwan. Prior research has indicated that the dual presence of cancer and mental disorder in patients led to increased medical burden. Furthermore, patients with cancer and concomitant mental disorder could incur as much as 50% more annual costs than those without. Although previous studies have investigated the utilization of patients with both diseases, the effects of morbidity sequence order on patient costs are, however, uncertain. This study explored medical expenditures linked with the comorbidity of cancer and mental disorder, with a focus on the impact of diagnosis sequence order.

METHODS

This population-based retrospective matched cohort study retrieved patients with cancer and mental disorder (aged ≥ 20 years) from the Ministry of Health and Welfare Data Science Center 2005-2015 database. 321,045 patients were divided based on having one or both diseases, as well as on the sequence of mental disorder and cancer diagnosis. Study subjects were paired with comparison counterparts free of both diseases using Propensity Score Matching at a 1:1 ratio. Annual Cost per Patient Linear Model (with a log-link function and gamma distribution) was used to assess the average annual cost, covarying for socio-demographic and clinical factors. Binomial Logistic Regression was used to evaluate factors associated with the risk of high-utilization.

RESULTS

The "Cancer only" group had higher adjusted mean annual costs (NT$126,198), more than 5-times that of the reference group (e^β: 5.45, p < 0.001). However, after exclusion of patients with non-cancer and inclusion of diagnosis sequence order for patients with cancer and concomitant mental disorder, the post-cancer mental disorder group had the highest expenditures at over 13% higher than those diagnosed with only cancer on per capita basis (e^β: 1.13, p < 0.001), whereas patients with cancer and any pre-existing mental disorder incurred lower expenditures than those with only cancer. The diagnosis of post-cancer mental disorder was significantly associated with high-utilization (OR = 1.24; 95% CI: 1.047-1.469). Other covariates associated with high-utilizer status included female sex, middle to old age, and late stage cancer.

CONCLUSION

Presence of mental disorder prior to cancer had a diminishing effect on medical utilization in patients, possibly indicating low medical compliance or adherence in patients with mental disorder on initial treatments after cancer diagnosis. Patients with post-cancer mental disorder had the highest average annual cost. Similar results were found in the odds of reaching high-utilizer status. The follow-up of cancer treatment for patients with pre-existing mental disorders warrants more emphasis in an attempt to effectively allocate medical resources.

Breast Cancer Care Pathways for Women with Preexisting Severe Mental Disorders: Evidence of Disparities in France?

The excess cancer mortality in persons with severe mental illness (SMI) has been well documented, and research suggests that it may be influenced by care-related factors. Our objective was to assess breast cancer care pathways in women with SMI in France, using an exhaustive population-based data-linkage study with a matched case-control design. The cases were 1346 women with incident breast cancer in 2013/2014 and preexisting SMI who were matched with three controls without SMI presenting similar demographics, initial breast cancer type, and year of incidence. We compared cancer care pathways and their quality for cases and controls, using a consensual set of indicators covering diagnosis, treatment, follow-up, and mortality (until 2017). After adjusting for covariates, cases had lower odds to undergo the main diagnostic tests, lumpectomy, adjuvant chemotherapy, and radiotherapy, as well as hormone therapy, but higher odds for mastectomy. Suboptimal quality in cancer pathways was observed for both groups, but to a higher extent for cases, especially for not receiving timely care after diagnosis and post-treatment follow-up. Breast cancer mortality, considering competing risks of deaths, was significantly elevated in women with SMI. These findings highlight disparities in cancer care pathways for individuals with SMI, as well as specific aspects of the care continuum which could benefit from targeted actions to reach equity of outcomes.

Colorectal cancer treatment in people with severe mental illness: a systematic review and meta-analysis

AIMS

People with severe mental illness (SMI) have a greater risk of dying from colorectal cancer (CRC), even though the incidence is lower or similar to that of the general population This pattern is unlikely to be solely explained by lifestyle factors, while the role of differences in cancer healthcare access or treatment is uncertain.

METHODS

We undertook a systematic review and meta-analysis on access to guideline-appropriate care following CRC diagnosis in people with SMI including the receipt of surgery, chemo- or radiotherapy. We searched for full-text articles indexed by PubMed, EMBASE, PsychInfo and CINAHL that compared CRC treatment in those with and without pre-existing SMI (schizophrenia, schizoaffective, bipolar and major affective disorders). Designs included cohort or population-based case-control designs.

RESULTS

There were ten studies (sample size = 3501-591 561). People with SMI had a reduced likelihood of surgery (RR = 0.90, 95% CI 0.92-0.97; p = 0.005; k = 4). Meta-analyses were not possible for the other outcomes but in results from individual studies, people with SMI were less likely to receive radiotherapy, chemotherapy or sphincter-sparing procedures. The disparity in care was greatest for those who had been psychiatric inpatients.

CONCLUSIONS

People with SMI, including both psychotic and affective disorders, receive less CRC care than the general population. This might contribute to higher case-fatality rates for an illness where the incidence is no higher than that of the general population. The reasons for this require further investigation, as does the extent to which differences in treatment access or quality contribute to excess CRC mortality in people with SMI.

Incidence of psychiatric illness in patients with neuroendocrine tumors: a comparative population-based analysis

PURPOSE

Diversion of tryptophan to tumoral hormonal production has been suggested to result in psychiatric illnesses in neuroendocrine tumors (NET). We measured the occurrence of psychiatric illness after NET diagnosis and compare it to colon cancer (CC).

METHODS

We conducted a population-based retrospective cohort study. Adults with NET were matched 1:1 to CC (2000-2019). Psychiatric illness was defined by mental health diagnoses and mental health care use after a cancer diagnosis, categorized as severe, other, and none. Cumulative incidence functions accounted for death as a competing risk.

RESULTS

A total of 11,223 NETs were matched to CC controls. Five-year cumulative incidences of severe psychiatric illness for NETs vs. CC was 7.7% (95%CI 7.2-8.2%) vs 7.6% (95%CI 7.2-8.2%) (p = 0.50), and that of other psychiatric illness was 32.9% (95%CI 32.0-33.9%) vs 31.6% (95%CI 30.8-32.6%) (p = 0.005). In small bowel and lung NETs, 5-year cumulative incidences of severe (8.1% [95%CI 7.3-8.9%] vs. 7.0% [95%CI 6.3-7.8%]; p = 0.01) and other psychiatric illness (34.7% [95%CI 33.3-36.1%] vs. 31.1% [95%CI 29.7-32.5%]; p < 0.01) were higher than for matched CC. The same was observed for serotonin-producing NETs for both severe (7.9% [95%CI 6.5-9.4%] vs. 6.8% [95%CI 5.5-8.2%]; p = 0.02) and other psychiatric illness (35.4% [95%CI 32.8-38.1%] vs. 31.9% [95%CI 29.3-34.4%]; p = 0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

In all NETs, there was no difference observed in the incidence of psychiatric illness compared to CC. For sub-groups of small bowel and lung NETs and of serotonin-producing NETs, the incidence of psychiatric illness was higher than for CC. These data suggest a signal towards a relationship between those sub-groups of NETs and psychiatric illness.

Equity-Oriented Healthcare: What It Is and Why We Need It in Oncology

Alarming differences exist in cancer outcomes for people most impacted by persistent and widening health and social inequities. People who are socially disadvantaged often have higher cancer-related mortality and are diagnosed with advanced cancers more often than other people. Such outcomes are linked to the compounding effects of stigma, discrimination, and other barriers, which create persistent inequities in access to care at all points in the cancer trajectory, preventing timely diagnosis and treatment, and further widening the health equity gap. In this commentary, we discuss how growing evidence suggests that people who are considered marginalized are not well-served by the cancer care sector and how the design and structure of services can often impose profound barriers to populations considered socially disadvantaged. We highlight equity-oriented healthcare as one strategy that can begin to address inequities in health outcomes and access to care by taking action to transform organizational cultures and approaches to the design and delivery of cancer services.

Colorectal Cancer Survival in Multiple Sclerosis: A Matched Cohort Study

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

We tested the hypothesis that overall and cancer-specific survival after a colorectal cancer diagnosis is lower in persons with multiple sclerosis (MS) than in those without MS using a retrospective matched cohort design.

METHODS

Using population-based administrative data in Manitoba and Ontario, we identified persons with MS from a validated case definition and linked these cohorts to cancer registries to identify those with colorectal cancer. We selected persons with colorectal cancer and without MS, matching 4:1 on birth year, sex, cancer diagnosis year, and region. We used Cox proportional hazards regression to compare all-cause survival between cohorts, adjusting for age at cancer diagnosis, cancer diagnosis year, income, region, and Elixhauser comorbidity score. We compared cancer-specific survival between cohorts using a cause-specific hazards model. We pooled findings across provinces using random-effects meta-analysis. Complementary analyses using a subcohort from Ontario, adjusted for cancer stage and disability status, as measured from the use of home care or long-term care services.

RESULTS

We included 338 MS cases and 1,352 controls with colorectal cancer. The mean (SD) age at cancer diagnosis was 64.7 (11.1) years. After adjustment, MS was associated with an increased hazard for all-cause death that was highest 6 months after diagnosis (hazard ratio [HR] 1.45, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.19-1.76) and then declined over time (HR [95% CI] at 1 year 1.34 [1.09-1.63], 2 years 1.24 [0.99-1.56], 5 years 1.10 [0.80-1.50]). MS was associated with increased cancer-specific death at 6 months after diagnosis only (HR 1.29, 95% CI 1.04-1.61). After adjustment for cancer stage, MS was associated with an increased hazard of death due to any cause (1.60, 95% CI 1.16-2.21) and with cancer-specific death (HR 1.47, 95% CI 1.02-2.12). The association of MS and all-cause death was partially attenuated after adjustment for disability status (HR 1.37, 95% CI 0.97-1.92), as was the association with cancer-specific death (HR 1.34, 95% CI 0.91-1.97).

DISCUSSION

Overall and cancer-specific survival was lower in persons with than without MS in the early period after colorectal cancer diagnosis. Further study is warranted to determine what factors underlie these worse outcomes.

Barriers to cancer care for people with significant mental health difficulties: What healthcare staff say?

OBJECTIVES

Despite similar rates in cancer morbidity, patients with comorbid significant mental health difficulties (SMHD) experience higher mortality rates. This population has largely been neglected in cancer care research. Little is known about how to improve cancer outcomes for patients with SMHD. The aim of this research is to explore the views of healthcare professionals concerning the provision of cancer care to individuals with SMHD in an Irish context.

METHODS

Semi-structured interviews were conducted with healthcare professionals (n = 28) providing care to people with SMHD and cancer. This included oncology and psychiatry consultants (n = 10); clinical nurse specialists (n = 8); clinical psychologists (n = 6); and medical social workers (n = 4). Data were analysed using thematic analysis.

RESULTS

Four overarching themes were generated from the data highlighting the challenges associated with healthcare provision for this cohort. The themes were: Fragmentation of Care, Healthcare Providers' Understanding of SMHD, Complex Nature of Presentation, and Specialised Care Needs.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings contribute to advancing our understanding of cancer care provision for patients with SMHD. They identify important barriers and facilitators to cancer care provision for this population from the perspective of healthcare professionals in Ireland. These findings will help to shape future research and contribute to improving the quality-of-care for people with SMHD and cancer.

Cancer and schizophrenia

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

On the basis of articles published in 2018, 2019 and 2020, the first aim of this review is to present estimates of incidence rates and excess mortality of overall cancer and organ-specific cancers for patients with schizophrenia compared with the general population.The second aim is to explore if underdiagnosis and undertreatment can explain - at least partly - the increased mortality of cancer in patients with schizophrenia compared with the general population.

RECENT FINDINGS

Patients diagnosed with schizophrenia have an approximately 50% increased risk of death by cancer compared to age and sex-matched people in the general population. Studies have confirmed an increased mortality from breast, lung and colon cancer in patients with schizophrenia.Analyses of incidence of cancer revealed contradicting results, with some studies showing no increase in incidence and others a modestly increased incidence in overall cancer. Studies of incidence of specific types of cancers showed modestly increased risk of pancreas, oesophagus, breast cancer and contradicting results regarding lung cancer.In studies identified that compared to the general population, patients with schizophrenia were at an increased risk of not being diagnosed or treated for cancer before death of cancer. In addition, patients with schizophrenia had lower chances of getting optimal treatment for colon cancer after diagnosis.

SUMMARY

This review indicates that patients with schizophrenia are at increased risk of dying of cancer and of several specific types of cancer. This increased mortality can be reduced if the price of tobacco is increased, if smoking cessation programmes are offered systematically, screening programs better implemented in this highly vulnerable group, and if procedures to facilitate access to early diagnosis and effective treatment are implemented.

Using additive and relative hazards to quantify colorectal survival inequalities for patients with a severe psychiatric illness

PURPOSE

We examine colorectal cancer (CRC) survival for patients with and without severe psychiatric illness (SPI) to demonstrate the use of relative and absolute effects.

METHODS

This included a retrospective cohort study of patients with CRC diagnosed between 01/04/2007 and 31/12/2012. SPI was defined as major depression, bipolar disorder, schizophrenia, and other psychotic illnesses occurring six months to five years preceding cancer diagnosis and categorized as inpatient, outpatient, or none. Associations between SPI history and death were examined using Cox proportional hazards regression (hazard ratios (HRs)) and Aalen's semiparametric additive hazards regression (absolute differences).

RESULTS

A total of 24,507 patients with CRC were included. A total of 58.1% of patients with inpatient SPI history died, and 47.1% of patients with outpatient SPI history died. Patients with an outpatient SPI history had a 40% (HR 1.40, 95% confidence interval: 1.22-1.59) increased hazard of death, and patients with an inpatient SPI history had a 91% increased hazard of death (HR 1.91, 95% confidence interval: 1.63-2.25), relative to no history of a mental illness. Outpatient SPI history was associated with additional 33 deaths per 1000 person years, and inpatient SPI was associated with additional 82 deaths per 1000 person years.

CONCLUSIONS

We encourage future studies examining inequities with time-to-event data to use this method addressing both relative and absolute effect.