1
|
Huang MM, Rac G, Felice M, Ellis JL, Handa N, Li EV, McCormick M, Bsatee A, Piyevsky B, Ross AE, Yonover PM, Gupta GN, Patel HD. Prostate magnetic resonance imaging to predict grade concordance, extra prostatic extension, and biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy. Urol Oncol 2025; 43:445.e11-445.e19. [PMID: 40082107 DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2025.02.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/18/2024] [Revised: 01/23/2025] [Accepted: 02/15/2025] [Indexed: 03/16/2025]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To investigate whether preoperative prostate MRI findings predicted biopsy to radical prostate (RP) grade group concordance, presence of extraprostatic extension (EPE), and biochemical recurrence (BCR) after RP. MATERIAL AND METHODS We conducted a multi-institutional study (tertiary academic center and community practice) including patients who underwent RP (2014-2021) with preoperative MRI. Grade concordance for systematic, targeted, and combined prostate biopsy was compared to RP. Concordances were also compared for a contemporaneous RP cohort without prebiopsy MRI (No MRI cohort). We assessed association of extracapsular extension on MRI (MRI-ECE) with EPE and BCR after RP. RESULTS Among 768 men, concordance between biopsy and RP was 65.7% for combined, 58.3% for targeted, and 44.7% for systematic biopsy (P < 0.001). There was no difference in upgrading, concordance, and downgrading compared to 1014 men in the No MRI cohort (P = 0.6). Combined biopsy decreased upgrading to Grade Group ≥3 by 9.2%. EPE after RP was present in 292/768 (38%). MRI-ECE had 56% sensitivity, 74% specificity, 57% positive predictive value, and 73% negative predictive value. MRI-ECE was associated with EPE (OR: 2.25, P < 0.001) and BCR (HR: 1.77, P = 0.006). An MRI-based model improved EPE prediction in the development cohort (AUC 0.80) compared to a traditional nomogram but failed external validation (AUC 0.68). CONCLUSIONS Preoperative MRI findings predicted grade concordance, presence of EPE, and risk of BCR after RP. Variability in MRI-ECE interpretation limited generalizability of models to predict EPE indicating a need for more standardized reporting to increase clinical utility.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mitchell M Huang
- Department of Urology, Northwestern University, Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL.
| | - Goran Rac
- Department of Urology, Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood, IL
| | - Michael Felice
- Department of Urology, Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood, IL
| | - Jeffrey L Ellis
- Department of Urology, Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood, IL
| | - Nicole Handa
- Department of Urology, Northwestern University, Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL
| | - Eric V Li
- Department of Urology, Northwestern University, Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL
| | - Mallory McCormick
- Department of Urology, Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood, IL
| | - Aya Bsatee
- Department of Urology, Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood, IL
| | - Brandon Piyevsky
- Wright State University Boonshoft School of Medicine, Dayton, OH
| | - Ashley E Ross
- Department of Urology, Northwestern University, Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL
| | - Paul M Yonover
- UroPartners, LLC, Chicago, IL; Department of Urology, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL
| | - Gopal N Gupta
- Department of Urology, Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood, IL; Department of Radiology, Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood, IL; Department of Surgery, Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood, IL
| | - Hiten D Patel
- Department of Urology, Northwestern University, Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL; Department of Urology, Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood, IL; Surgery Service, Jesse Brown VA Medical Center, Chicago, IL
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Nalavenkata SB, Vertosick E, Briganti A, Ahmed H, Eldred-Evans D, Gordon S, Raghallaigh H, Gratzke C, O'Callaghan M, Liss M, Chiu P, Müntener M, Yaxley J, Poyet C, Jahnen M, Toi A, Ghai S, Margolis D, Ankerst D, Ehdaie B, Patel MI, Vickers AJ. Variation in Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging Performance: Data from the Prostate Biopsy Collaborative Group. Eur Urol Oncol 2025:S2588-9311(25)00047-1. [PMID: 40318951 DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2025.02.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/17/2024] [Revised: 02/04/2025] [Accepted: 02/24/2025] [Indexed: 05/07/2025]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE The quality and reporting of prostate magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are operator dependent, leading to variations in estimates such as positive predictive value across sites. This impacts patient counseling, risk modeling, and risk calculators. This study assessed variation in Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) score classification and subsequent probability of grade group (GG) ≥2 + prostate cancer. METHODS Data from the Prostate Biopsy Collaborative Group, including multiple sites in North America, Europe, and Asia Pacific, were analyzed. Patients underwent multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) of the prostate followed by prostate biopsy during the years 2010-2023. Only those with MRI-targeted biopsy and PI-RADS score ≥3 were included. The risk of being assigned PI-RADS 4 or 5 and risk of GG ≥2 disease for these scores were estimated using logistic regression. KEY FINDINGS AND LIMITATIONS The cohort included 7325 biopsies from 7320 unique patients from 13 sites. A two-fold variation in the probability of PI-RADS 4 or 5 assignment across sites persisted even after adjustment for patient risk (heterogeneity p < 0.001 for both). There were significant differences in the absolute risk of GG ≥2 disease for PI-RADS 4 and 5 (heterogeneity p < 0.001 for both), varying between 23% and 68% and between 49% and 87%, respectively. The use of prostate biopsy as a reference standard has limitations but reflects typical usage of mpMRI in clinical practice. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS The probability of being assigned PI-RADS 4 or 5 and subsequent detection of GG ≥2 disease varies widely between institutions. This impacts counseling, risk stratification, and clinical practice, necessitating better standardization in the performance and interpretation of mpMRI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sunny B Nalavenkata
- Department of Surgery (Urology Service), Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Department of Urology, Westmead Hospital, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Emily Vertosick
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Alberto Briganti
- Unit of Urology/Division of Oncology, IRCCS San Raffaele, San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Hashim Ahmed
- Department of Urology, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | | | | | | | - Christian Gratzke
- Division of Urology, University Hospital Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | | | - Michael Liss
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio, TX, USA
| | - Peter Chiu
- SH Ho Urology Centre, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong
| | | | - John Yaxley
- Wesley Urology Clinic, Wesley Hospital, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Cedric Poyet
- Department of Urology, University Hospital of Zürich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Matthias Jahnen
- Technical University of Munich (TUM) Hospital, Munich, Germany
| | - Ants Toi
- Joint Department of Medical Imaging, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Sangeet Ghai
- Joint Department of Medical Imaging, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Daniel Margolis
- Department of Radiology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Donna Ankerst
- Department of Mathematics, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Munich, Germany
| | - Behfar Ehdaie
- Department of Surgery (Urology Service), Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Manish I Patel
- Department of Urology, Westmead Hospital, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Andrew J Vickers
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Liu J, Zhang H, Woon DTS, Perera M, Lawrentschuk N. Predicting Biochemical Recurrence of Prostate Cancer Post-Prostatectomy Using Artificial Intelligence: A Systematic Review. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:3596. [PMID: 39518036 PMCID: PMC11545810 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16213596] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2024] [Revised: 10/21/2024] [Accepted: 10/22/2024] [Indexed: 11/16/2024] Open
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Biochemical recurrence (BCR) after radical prostatectomy (RP) is a significant predictor of distal metastases and mortality in prostate cancer (PCa) patients. This systematic review aims to evaluate the accuracy of artificial intelligence (AI) in predicting BCR post-RP. Methods: Adhering to PRISMA guidelines, a comprehensive literature search was conducted across Medline, Embase, Web of Science, and IEEE Xplore. Studies were included if they utilised AI to predict BCR in patients post-RP. Studies involving patients who underwent radiotherapy or salvage RP were excluded. This systematic review was registered on PROSPERO (International prospective register of systematic reviews) under the ID CRD42023482392. Results: After screening 9764 articles, 24 met the inclusion criteria. The included studies involved 27,216 patients, of whom 7267 developed BCR. AI algorithms developed using radiological parameters demonstrated higher predictive accuracy (median AUROC of 0.90) compared to algorithms based solely on pathological variables (median AUROC of 0.74) or clinicopathological variables (median AUROC of 0.81). According to the Prediction Model Risk of Bias Assessment Tool (PROBAST), the overall risk of bias was unclear in three studies due to ambiguous inclusion criteria and the exclusion of many patients because of missing follow-up data. In seven studies, the developed AI outperformed or was at least equivocal to traditional methods of BCR prediction. Conclusions: AI shows promise in predicting BCR post-RP, particularly when radiological data were used in its development. However, the significant variability in AI performance and study methodologies highlights the need for larger, standardised prospective studies with external validation prior to clinical application.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jianliang Liu
- E.J. Whitten Prostate Cancer Research Centre, Epworth Healthcare, Melbourne 3002, Australia (D.T.S.W.)
- Department of Urology, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne 3052, Australia
- Department of Surgery, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne 3052, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne 3051, Australia
| | - Haoyue Zhang
- E.J. Whitten Prostate Cancer Research Centre, Epworth Healthcare, Melbourne 3002, Australia (D.T.S.W.)
- Department of Surgery, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne 3052, Australia
| | - Dixon T. S. Woon
- E.J. Whitten Prostate Cancer Research Centre, Epworth Healthcare, Melbourne 3002, Australia (D.T.S.W.)
- Department of Surgery, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne 3052, Australia
| | - Marlon Perera
- E.J. Whitten Prostate Cancer Research Centre, Epworth Healthcare, Melbourne 3002, Australia (D.T.S.W.)
- Department of Surgery, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne 3052, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne 3051, Australia
| | - Nathan Lawrentschuk
- E.J. Whitten Prostate Cancer Research Centre, Epworth Healthcare, Melbourne 3002, Australia (D.T.S.W.)
- Department of Urology, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne 3052, Australia
- Department of Surgery, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne 3052, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne 3051, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Alessi S, Maggioni R, Luzzago S, Summers PE, Renne G, Zugni F, Belmonte M, Raimondi S, Vignati S, Mistretta FA, Di Meglio L, D'Ascoli E, Scarabelli A, Marvaso G, De Cobelli O, Musi G, Jereczek-Fossa BA, Curigliano G, Petralia G. Association between mpMRI detected tumor apparent diffusion coefficient and 5-year biochemical recurrence risk after radical prostatectomy. LA RADIOLOGIA MEDICA 2024; 129:1394-1404. [PMID: 39014292 DOI: 10.1007/s11547-024-01857-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/08/2024] [Accepted: 07/04/2024] [Indexed: 07/18/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE To assess the ability of tumor apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values obtained from multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) to predict the risk of 5-year biochemical recurrence (BCR) after radical prostatectomy (RP). MATERIALS AND METHODS This retrospective analysis included 1207 peripheral and 232 non-peripheral zone prostate cancer (PCa) patients who underwent mpMRI before RP (2012-2015), with the outcome of interest being 5-year BCR. ADC was evaluated as a continuous variable and as categories: low (< 850 µm2/s), intermediate (850-1100 µm2/s), and high (> 1100 µm2/s). Kaplan-Meier curves with log-rank testing of BCR-free survival, multivariable Cox proportional hazard regression models were formed to estimate the risk of BCR. RESULTS Among the 1439 males with median age 63 (± 7) years, the median follow-up was 59 months, and 306 (25%) patients experienced BCR. Peripheral zone PCa patients with BCR had lower tumor ADC values than those without BCR (874 versus 1025 µm2/s, p < 0.001). Five-year BCR-free survival rates were 52.3%, 74.4%, and 87% for patients in the low, intermediate, and high ADC value categories, respectively (p < 0.0001). Lower ADC was associated with BCR, both as continuously coded variable (HR: 5.35; p < 0.001) and as ADC categories (intermediate versus high ADC-HR: 1.56, p = 0.017; low vs. high ADC-HR; 2.36, p < 0.001). In the non-peripheral zone PCa patients, no association between ADC and BCR was observed. CONCLUSION Tumor ADC values and categories were found to be predictive of the 5-year BCR risk after RP in patients with peripheral zone PCa and may serve as a prognostic biomarker.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah Alessi
- Division of Radiology, IEO European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Via Ripamonti 435, Milan, Italy.
| | - Roberta Maggioni
- Division of Radiology, IEO European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Via Ripamonti 435, Milan, Italy
| | - Stefano Luzzago
- Department of Urology, IEO European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Via Ripamonti 435, Milan, Italy
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, 20122, Milan, Italy
| | - Paul E Summers
- Division of Radiology, IEO European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Via Ripamonti 435, Milan, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Renne
- Division of Uropathology and Intraoperative Diagnostic Division, IEO European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Via Ripamonti 435, Milan, Italy
| | - Fabio Zugni
- Division of Radiology, IEO European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Via Ripamonti 435, Milan, Italy
| | - Maddalena Belmonte
- Division of Radiology, IEO European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Via Ripamonti 435, Milan, Italy
| | - Sara Raimondi
- Molecular and Pharmaco-Epidemiology Unit Department of Experimental Oncology IEO European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Via Ripamonti 435, Milan, Italy
| | - Silvano Vignati
- Molecular and Pharmaco-Epidemiology Unit Department of Experimental Oncology IEO European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Via Ripamonti 435, Milan, Italy
| | - Francesco A Mistretta
- Department of Urology, IEO European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Via Ripamonti 435, Milan, Italy
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, 20122, Milan, Italy
| | - Letizia Di Meglio
- Postgraduation School in Radiodiagnostics, University of Milan, Via Festa del Perdono 7, 20122, Milan, Italy
| | - Elisa D'Ascoli
- Postgraduation School in Radiodiagnostics, University of Milan, Via Festa del Perdono 7, 20122, Milan, Italy
| | - Alice Scarabelli
- Postgraduation School in Radiodiagnostics, University of Milan, Via Festa del Perdono 7, 20122, Milan, Italy
| | - Giulia Marvaso
- Division of Radiation Oncology, IEO European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Via Ripamonti 435, Milan, Italy
| | - Ottavio De Cobelli
- Department of Urology, IEO European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Via Ripamonti 435, Milan, Italy
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, 20122, Milan, Italy
| | - Gennaro Musi
- Department of Urology, IEO European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Via Ripamonti 435, Milan, Italy
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, 20122, Milan, Italy
| | - Barbara Alicja Jereczek-Fossa
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, 20122, Milan, Italy
- Division of Radiation Oncology, IEO European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Via Ripamonti 435, Milan, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Curigliano
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, 20122, Milan, Italy
- Division of Early Drug Development for Innovative Therapy, IEO European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Via Ripamonti 435, Milan, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Petralia
- Division of Radiology, IEO European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Via Ripamonti 435, Milan, Italy
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, 20122, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Lehto TPK, Pylväläinen J, Sandeman K, Kenttämies A, Nordling S, Mills IG, Tang J, Mirtti T, Rannikko A. Histomic and transcriptomic features of MRI-visible and invisible clinically significant prostate cancers are associated with prognosis. Int J Cancer 2024; 154:926-939. [PMID: 37767987 DOI: 10.1002/ijc.34743] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/03/2023] [Revised: 08/27/2023] [Accepted: 09/06/2023] [Indexed: 09/29/2023]
Abstract
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is increasingly used to triage patients for prostate biopsy. However, 9% to 24% of clinically significant (cs) prostate cancers (PCas) are not visible in MRI. We aimed to identify histomic and transcriptomic determinants of MRI visibility and their association to metastasis, and PCa-specific death (PCSD). We studied 45 radical prostatectomy-treated patients with csPCa (grade group [GG]2-3), including 30 with MRI-visible and 15 with MRI-invisible lesions, and 18 men without PCa. First, histological composition was quantified. Next, transcriptomic profiling was performed using NanoString technology. MRI visibility-associated differentially expressed genes (DEGs) and Reactome pathways were identified. MRI visibility was classified using publicly available genes in MSK-IMPACT and Decipher, Oncotype DX, and Prolaris. Finally, DEGs and clinical parameters were used to classify metastasis and PCSD in an external cohort, which included 76 patients with metastatic GG2-4 PCa, and 84 baseline-matched controls without progression. Luminal area was lower in MRI-visible than invisible lesions and low luminal area was associated with short metastasis-free and PCa-specific survival. We identified 67 DEGs, eight of which were associated with survival. Cell division, inflammation and transcriptional regulation pathways were upregulated in MRI-visible csPCas. Genes in Decipher, Oncotype DX and MSK-IMPACT performed well in classifying MRI visibility (AUC = 0.86-0.94). DEGs improved classification of metastasis (AUC = 0.69) and PCSD (AUC = 0.68) over clinical parameters. Our data reveals that MRI-visible csPCas harbor more aggressive histomic and transcriptomic features than MRI-invisible csPCas. Thus, targeted biopsy of visible lesions may be sufficient for risk stratification in patients with a positive MRI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Timo-Pekka K Lehto
- Department of Pathology, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
- Department of Urology, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
- Research Program in Systems Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Juho Pylväläinen
- Department of Radiology, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
| | | | - Anu Kenttämies
- Department of Radiology, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Stig Nordling
- Department of Pathology, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Ian G Mills
- Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxfordshire, UK
- Patrik G Johnston Centre for Cancer Research, Queen's University of Belfast, Belfast, UK
| | - Jing Tang
- Research Program in Systems Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
- Department of Biochemistry and Developmental Biology, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Tuomas Mirtti
- Department of Pathology, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
- Research Program in Systems Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, School of Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
- iCAN-Digital Precision Cancer Medicine Flagship, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Antti Rannikko
- Department of Urology, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
- Research Program in Systems Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
- iCAN-Digital Precision Cancer Medicine Flagship, Helsinki, Finland
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Akin O, Woo S, Oto A, Allen BC, Avery R, Barker SJ, Gerena M, Halpern DJ, Gettle LM, Rosenthal SA, Taneja SS, Turkbey B, Whitworth P, Nikolaidis P. ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Pretreatment Detection, Surveillance, and Staging of Prostate Cancer: 2022 Update. J Am Coll Radiol 2023; 20:S187-S210. [PMID: 37236742 DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2023.02.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/21/2023] [Accepted: 02/27/2023] [Indexed: 05/28/2023]
Abstract
Prostate cancer is second leading cause of death from malignancy after lung cancer in American men. The primary goal during pretreatment evaluation of prostate cancer is disease detection, localization, establishing disease extent (both local and distant), and evaluating aggressiveness, which are the driving factors of patient outcomes such as recurrence and survival. Prostate cancer is typically diagnosed after the recognizing elevated serum prostate-specific antigen level or abnormal digital rectal examination. Tissue diagnosis is obtained by transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy or MRI-targeted biopsy, commonly with multiparametric MRI without or with intravenous contrast, which has recently been established as standard of care for detecting, localizing, and assessing local extent of prostate cancer. Although bone scintigraphy and CT are still typically used to detect bone and nodal metastases in patients with intermediate- or high-risk prostate cancer, novel advanced imaging modalities including prostatespecific membrane antigen PET/CT and whole-body MRI are being more frequently utilized for this purpose with improved detection rates. The ACR Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of well-established methodologies (RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where evidence is lacking or equivocal, expert opinion may supplement the available evidence to recommend imaging or treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Oguz Akin
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
| | - Sungmin Woo
- Research Author, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Aytekin Oto
- Panel Chair, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Brian C Allen
- Panel Vice-Chair, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Ryan Avery
- Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois; Commission on Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging
| | - Samantha J Barker
- University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota; Director of Ultrasound M Health Fairview
| | | | - David J Halpern
- Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, Primary care physician
| | | | - Seth A Rosenthal
- Sutter Medical Group, Sacramento, California; Commission on Radiation Oncology; Member, RTOG Foundation Board of Directors
| | - Samir S Taneja
- NYU Clinical Cancer Center, New York, New York; American Urological Association
| | - Baris Turkbey
- National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Pat Whitworth
- Thomas F. Frist, Jr College of Medicine, Belmont University, Nashville, Tennessee
| | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Sun YK, Yu Y, Xu G, Wu J, Liu YY, Wang S, Dong L, Xiang LH, Xu HX. Added value of shear-wave elastography in the prediction of extracapsular extension and seminal vesicle invasion before radical prostatectomy. Asian J Androl 2023; 25:259-264. [PMID: 36153925 PMCID: PMC10069689 DOI: 10.4103/aja202256] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/04/2022] [Accepted: 07/14/2022] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to analyze the value of transrectal shear-wave elastography (SWE) in combination with multivariable tools for predicting adverse pathological features before radical prostatectomy (RP). Preoperative clinicopathological variables, multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mp-MRI) manifestations, and the maximum elastic value of the prostate (Emax) on SWE were retrospectively collected. The accuracy of SWE for predicting adverse pathological features was evaluated based on postoperative pathology, and parameters with statistical significance were selected. The diagnostic performance of various models, including preoperative clinicopathological variables (model 1), preoperative clinicopathological variables + mp-MRI (model 2), and preoperative clinicopathological variables + mp-MRI + SWE (model 3), was evaluated with area under the receiver operator characteristic curve (AUC) analysis. Emax was significantly higher in prostate cancer with extracapsular extension (ECE) or seminal vesicle invasion (SVI) with both P < 0.001. The optimal cutoff Emax values for ECE and SVI were 60.45 kPa and 81.55 kPa, respectively. Inclusion of mp-MRI and SWE improved discrimination by clinical models for ECE (model 2 vs model 1, P = 0.031; model 3 vs model 1, P = 0.002; model 3 vs model 2, P = 0.018) and SVI (model 2 vs model 1, P = 0.147; model 3 vs model 1, P = 0.037; model 3 vs model 2, P = 0.134). SWE is valuable for identifying patients at high risk of adverse pathology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yi-Kang Sun
- Department of Medical Ultrasound, Center of Minimally Invasive Treatment for Tumor, Shanghai Tenth People’s Hospital, Ultrasound Research and Education Institute, Clinical Research Center for Interventional Medicine, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai 200072, China
- Department of Ultrasound, Zhongshan Hospital, Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine and Engineering, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China
| | - Yang Yu
- Department of Urology, Shanghai Tenth People’s Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai 200072, China
| | - Guang Xu
- Department of Medical Ultrasound, Center of Minimally Invasive Treatment for Tumor, Shanghai Tenth People’s Hospital, Ultrasound Research and Education Institute, Clinical Research Center for Interventional Medicine, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai 200072, China
| | - Jian Wu
- Department of Medical Ultrasound, Center of Minimally Invasive Treatment for Tumor, Shanghai Tenth People’s Hospital, Ultrasound Research and Education Institute, Clinical Research Center for Interventional Medicine, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai 200072, China
| | - Yun-Yun Liu
- Department of Medical Ultrasound, Center of Minimally Invasive Treatment for Tumor, Shanghai Tenth People’s Hospital, Ultrasound Research and Education Institute, Clinical Research Center for Interventional Medicine, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai 200072, China
| | - Shuai Wang
- Department of Medical Ultrasound, Center of Minimally Invasive Treatment for Tumor, Shanghai Tenth People’s Hospital, Ultrasound Research and Education Institute, Clinical Research Center for Interventional Medicine, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai 200072, China
| | - Lin Dong
- Department of Medical Ultrasound, Center of Minimally Invasive Treatment for Tumor, Shanghai Tenth People’s Hospital, Ultrasound Research and Education Institute, Clinical Research Center for Interventional Medicine, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai 200072, China
| | - Li-Hua Xiang
- Department of Medical Ultrasound, Center of Minimally Invasive Treatment for Tumor, Shanghai Tenth People’s Hospital, Ultrasound Research and Education Institute, Clinical Research Center for Interventional Medicine, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai 200072, China
| | - Hui-Xiong Xu
- Department of Ultrasound, Zhongshan Hospital, Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine and Engineering, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Gravestock P, Somani BK, Tokas T, Rai BP. A Review of Modern Imaging Landscape for Prostate Cancer: A Comprehensive Clinical Guide. J Clin Med 2023; 12:jcm12031186. [PMID: 36769834 PMCID: PMC9918161 DOI: 10.3390/jcm12031186] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/20/2022] [Revised: 01/29/2023] [Accepted: 01/31/2023] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
The development of prostate cancer imaging is rapidly evolving, with many changes to the way patients are diagnosed, staged, and monitored for recurrence following treatment. New developments, including the potential role of imaging in screening and the combined diagnostic and therapeutic applications in the field of theranostics, are underway. In this paper, we aim to outline the current landscape in prostate cancer imaging and look to the future at the potential modalities and applications to come.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paul Gravestock
- Department of Urology, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne NE7 7DN, UK
| | - Bhaskar Kumar Somani
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Southampton NHS Trust, Southampton SO16 6YD, UK
| | - Theodoros Tokas
- Department of Urology and Andrology, General Hospital Hall in Tirol, 6060 Hall in Tirol, Austria
- Training and Research in Urological Surgery and Technology (T.R.U.S.T.)-Group, 6060 Hall in Tirol, Austria
| | - Bhavan Prasad Rai
- Department of Urology, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne NE7 7DN, UK
- Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Lophatananon A, Byrne MHV, Barrett T, Warren A, Muir K, Dokubo I, Georgiades F, Sheba M, Bibby L, Gnanapragasam VJ. Assessing the impact of MRI based diagnostics on pre-treatment disease classification and prognostic model performance in men diagnosed with new prostate cancer from an unscreened population. BMC Cancer 2022; 22:878. [PMID: 35953766 PMCID: PMC9367076 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-022-09955-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/02/2022] [Accepted: 07/31/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction Pre-treatment risk and prognostic groups are the cornerstone for deciding management in non-metastatic prostate cancer. All however, were developed in the pre-MRI era. Here we compared categorisation of cancers using either only clinical parameters or with MRI enhanced information in men referred for suspected prostate cancer from an unscreened population. Patient and methods Data from men referred from primary care to our diagnostic service and with both clinical (digital rectal examination [DRE] and systematic biopsies) and MRI enhanced attributes (MRI stage and combined systematic/targeted biopsies) were used for this study. Clinical vs MRI data were contrasted for clinico-pathological and risk group re-distribution using the European Association of Urology (EAU), American Urological Association (AUA) and UK National Institute for Health Care Excellence (NICE) Cambridge Prognostic Group (CPG) models. Differences were retrofitted to a population cohort with long-term prostate cancer mortality (PCM) outcomes to simulate impact on model performance. We further contrasted individualised overall survival (OS) predictions using the Predict Prostate algorithm. Results Data from 370 men were included (median age 66y). Pre-biopsy MRI stage reassignments occurred in 7.8% (versus DRE). Image-guided biopsies increased Grade Group 2 and ≥ Grade Group 3 assignments in 2.7% and 2.9% respectively. The main change in risk groups was more high-risk cancers (6.2% increase in the EAU and AUA system, 4.3% increase in CPG4 and 1.9% CPG5). When extrapolated to a historical population-based cohort (n = 10,139) the redistribution resulted in generally lower concordance indices for PCM. The 5-tier NICE-CPG system outperformed the 4-tier AUA and 3-tier EAU models (C Index 0.70 versus 0.65 and 0.64). Using an individualised prognostic model, changes in predicted OS were small (median difference 1% and 2% at 10- and 15-years’ respectively). Similarly, estimated treatment survival benefit changes were minimal (1% at both 10- and 15-years’ time frame). Conclusion MRI guided diagnostics does change pre-treatment risk groups assignments but the overall prognostic impact appears modest in men referred from unscreened populations. Particularly, when using more granular tiers or individualised prognostic models. Existing risk and prognostic models can continue to be used to counsel men about treatment option until long term survival outcomes are available.
Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12885-022-09955-w.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Artitaya Lophatananon
- Division of Population Health, Health Services Research & Primary Care Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Matthew H V Byrne
- Department of Urology, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - Tristan Barrett
- Department of Radiology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Anne Warren
- Department of Pathology, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - Kenneth Muir
- Division of Population Health, Health Services Research & Primary Care Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Ibifuro Dokubo
- Department of Urology, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - Fanos Georgiades
- Department of Urology, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK.,Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Mostafa Sheba
- Kasr Al Any School of Medicine, Cairo University, Giza, Egypt
| | - Lisa Bibby
- Department of Urology, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - Vincent J Gnanapragasam
- Department of Urology, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK. .,Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK. .,Cambridge Urology Translational Research and Clinical Trials Office, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Bratt O. Integrating magnetic resonance imaging and prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography/computed tomography results into prostate cancer treatment decision making. BJU Int 2021; 129:3-4. [PMID: 34967997 DOI: 10.1111/bju.15560] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2021] [Accepted: 07/28/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Ola Bratt
- Department of Urology, Institute of Clinical Science, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.,Department of Urology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Parker WP. EDITORIAL COMMENT. Urology 2021; 147:210-211. [PMID: 33390203 DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2020.08.090] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- William P Parker
- Department of Urology, The University of Kansas Health System, Kansas City, KS
| |
Collapse
|