Glutamate dehydrogenase as a biomarker for mitotoxicity; insights from furosemide hepatotoxicity in the mouse

Serum glutamate dehydrogenase activity enables sensitive and specific diagnosis of hepatocellular injury in humans

Serum activities of alanine- and aspartate aminotransferases (ALT and AST) are considered the "gold standard" biomarkers of hepatocyte injury in clinical practice and drug development. However, due to the expression of ALT and AST in myocytes, the diagnosis of hepatocellular injury in patients with underlying muscle diseases, including drug-induced muscle injury, is severely limited. Thus, we proposed glutamate dehydrogenase (GLDH) as a liver-specific alternative to serum ALT and AST. In fact, our exploratory studies showed that GLDH has comparable performance to ALT for detecting hepatocyte injury without interference from concomitant muscle injury. Here, we report the results of studies confirming the reference intervals in a healthy human population and the sensitivity and specificity of GLDH for the detection of hepatocyte injury in human subjects. In human subjects, we could not perform liver biopsies due to ethical reasons; we also confirmed the relationship of GLDH and histopathologic lesions using 32 model toxicants in rats. Furthermore, we have shown that injury to tissues that are known to express appreciable levels of GLDH does not affect serum GLDH measurements, indicating excellent liver specificity of serum GLDH. Finally, we observed faster elimination of GLDH than ALT in humans, indicating that decreasing GLDH values could be considered an early sign of recovery. This study provides comprehensive evidence of excellent sensitivity and liver specificity of GLDH for diagnosis of hepatocellular injury, including evaluation of reference intervals, which is essential for the interpretation of serum GLDH in human subjects.

Review article: Recommendations for detection, assessment and management of suspected drug-induced liver injury during clinical trials in oncology patients

BACKGROUND

Drug-induced liver injury (DILI) is a major concern for oncology drugs in clinical practice and under development. Monitoring cancer patients for hepatotoxicity is challenging as these patients may have abnormal liver tests pre-treatment or on-study for many reasons including liver injury due to past oncology treatments, hepatic metastases, medical co-morbidities such as heart failure, and concomitant medications. At present, there are no regulatory guidelines or position papers that systematically address best practices pertaining to DILI detection, assessment and management in oncology patients.

AIMS

The goals of this review are (1) to examine and interpret the available evidence and (2) to make recommendations for detection, monitoring, adjudication, and management of suspected hepatocellular DILI during oncology clinical trials.

METHODS

This manuscript was developed by the IQ Consortium (International Consortium for Innovation and Quality in pharmaceutical development) DILI Initiative that consists of members from 17 pharmaceutical companies, in collaboration with academic and regulatory DILI experts. The manuscript is based on extensive literature review, expert interpretation of the literature, and several rounds of consensus discussions.

RESULTS

This review highlights recommendations for patient eligibility for clinical trials with or without primary/metastatic liver involvement, as well as changes in liver tests that should trigger increased monitoring and/or discontinuation of study drug. Guidance regarding causality assessment for suspected DILI events, rechallenge and dose-modification is provided.

CONCLUSIONS

This review brings together evidence-based recommendations and expert opinion to provide the first dedicated consensus for best practices in detection, assessment, and management of DILI in oncology clinical trials.

The Role of Mechanistic Biomarkers in Understanding Acetaminophen Hepatotoxicity in Humans

Our understanding of the fundamental molecular mechanisms of acetaminophen (APAP) hepatotoxicity began in 1973 to 1974, when investigators at the US National Institutes of Health published seminal studies demonstrating conversion of APAP to a reactive metabolite that depletes glutathione and binds to proteins in the liver in mice after overdose. Since then, additional groundbreaking experiments have demonstrated critical roles for mitochondrial damage, oxidative stress, nuclear DNA fragmentation, and necrotic cell death as well. Over the years, some investigators have also attempted to translate these mechanisms to humans using human specimens from APAP overdose patients. This review presents those studies and summarizes what we have learned about APAP hepatotoxicity in humans so far. Overall, the mechanisms of APAP hepatotoxicity in humans strongly resemble those discovered in experimental mouse and cultured hepatocyte models, and emerging biomarkers also suggest similarities in liver repair. The data not only validate the first mechanistic studies of APAP-induced liver injury performed 50 years ago but also demonstrate the human relevance of numerous studies conducted since then. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Human studies using novel translational, mechanistic biomarkers have confirmed that the fundamental mechanisms of acetaminophen (APAP) hepatotoxicity discovered in rodent models since 1973 are the same in humans. Importantly, these findings have guided the development and understanding of treatments such as N-acetyl-l-cysteine and 4-methylpyrazole over the years. Additional research may improve not only our understanding of APAP overdose pathophysiology in humans but also our ability to predict and treat serious liver injury in patients.

Mefloquine-curcumin combinations improve host mitochondrial respiration and decrease mitotoxic effects of mefloquine in Plasmodium berghei-infected mice

Plasmodium infection is a health challenge. Although, antiplasmodial drugs kill the parasites, information on the effects of infection and drugs on the expression of some genes is limited. Malaria was induced in two different studies using NK65 (chloroquine-susceptible, study 1), and ANKA (chloroquine-resistant, study 2) strains of Plasmodium berghei in 30 male Swiss mice (n = 5) in each study. Mice orally received 10 mL/kg distilled water, (infected control), Mefloquine (MF) (10 mg/kg), MF and Curcumin (CM) (25 mg/kg), MF and CM (50 mg/kg), CM (25 mg/kg) and CM (50 mg/kg). Five mice (un-infected) were used as the control. After treatment, total Ribonucleic acid (RNA) was isolated from liver and erythrocytes while Deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA)-free RNA were converted to cDNA. Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) amplification was performed and relative expressions of FIKK12, AQP3, P38 MAPK, NADH oxidoreductase, and cytochrome oxidase expressions were determined. Markers of glycolysis, toxicity and antioxidants were determined using ELISA assays. While the expression of FIKK12 was blunted by MF in the susceptible study, co-treatment with curcumin (25 mg/kg) yielded the same results in the chloroquine-resistant study. Similar results were obtained on AQP3 in both studies. Curcumin decreased P38 MAPK in both studies. Plasmodium infection decreased NADH oxidoreductase and cytochrome oxidase but mefloquine-curcumin restored the expression of these genes. While glycolysis and toxicity were inhibited, antioxidant systems improved in the treated groups. Curcumin is needed for effective therapeutic efficacy and prevention of toxicity. Plasmodium infection and treatment modulate the expressions of some genes in the host. Curcumin combination with mefloquine modulates the expression of some genes in the host.

The Evolution of Circulating Biomarkers for Use in Acetaminophen/Paracetamol-Induced Liver Injury in Humans: A Scoping Review

Acetaminophen (APAP) is a widely used drug, but overdose can cause severe acute liver injury. The first reports of APAP hepatotoxicity in humans were published in 1966, shortly after the development of alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and aspartate aminotransferase (AST) as the first biomarkers of liver injury as opposed to liver function. Thus, the field of liver injury biomarkers has evolved alongside the growth in APAP hepatotoxicity incidence. Numerous biomarkers have been proposed for use in the management of APAP overdose patients in the intervening years. Here, we comprehensively review the development of these markers from the 1960s to the present day and briefly discuss possible future directions.

Active-phase Plasma Alkaline Phosphatase Isozyme Activity Is a Sensitive Biomarker for Excessive Fructose Intake

BACKGROUND/AIM

Excessive fructose intake reportedly leads to the development of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). In our previous study, we reported that plasma activities of alkaline phosphatase (ALP) isozymes were markedly changed in rats with excessive fructose intake-induced hepatomegaly. In this study, we examined ALP isozyme activity prior to the occurrence of hepatomegaly, and investigated the effect of the timing of sample collection, to explore its potential as a biomarker.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

After 1-week intake of a 63% high-fructose diet (HFrD), blood samples were collected from male rats during sleep or active phases to analyze biochemical parameters.

RESULTS

Body and liver weights were similar between the HFrD and control diet groups, indicating that hepatomegaly due to excessive fructose intake had not occurred. The triglyceride levels and glutamate dehydrogenase (GLDH) activity were significantly elevated to similar degrees at both time points. HFrD intake significantly increased liver-type ALP (L-ALP) activity, stimulating it by 12.7% at the sleep phase and by 124.3% at the active phase. HFrD consumption also significantly decreased intestinal-type ALP (I-ALP) at the active phase, but only showed a decreasing trend during the sleep phase.

CONCLUSION

Measurements of plasma ALP isozyme and GLDH activity, and triglyceride levels are effective early biomarkers of impending NAFLD caused by excessive fructose intake. L-ALP and I-ALP activities during the active phase are particularly sensitive for detection of excessive fructose intake before the occurrence of NAFLD.

Advanced Biomarkers of Hepatotoxicity in Psychiatry: A Narrative Review and Recommendations for New Psychoactive Substances

One of the factors that increase the effectiveness of the pharmacotherapy used in patients abusing various types of new psychoactive substances (NPSs) is the proper functioning of the liver. However, the articles published to date on NPS hepatotoxicity only address non-specific hepatic parameters. The aim of this manuscript was to review three advanced markers of hepatotoxicity in psychiatry, namely, osteopontin (OPN), high-mobility group box 1 protein (HMGB1) and glutathione dehydrogenase (GDH, GLDH), and, on this basis, to identify recommendations that should be included in future studies in patients abusing NPSs. This will make it possible to determine whether NPSs do indeed have a hepatotoxic effect or whether other factors, such as additional substances taken or hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection, are responsible. NPS abusers are at particular risk of HCV infection, and for this reason, it is all the more important to determine what factors actually show a hepatotoxic effect in them.

Mitochondrial Effects of Common Cardiovascular Medications: The Good, the Bad and the Mixed

Mitochondria are central organelles in the homeostasis of the cardiovascular system via the integration of several physiological processes, such as ATP generation via oxidative phosphorylation, synthesis/exchange of metabolites, calcium sequestration, reactive oxygen species (ROS) production/buffering and control of cellular survival/death. Mitochondrial impairment has been widely recognized as a central pathomechanism of almost all cardiovascular diseases, rendering these organelles important therapeutic targets. Mitochondrial dysfunction has been reported to occur in the setting of drug-induced toxicity in several tissues and organs, including the heart. Members of the drug classes currently used in the therapeutics of cardiovascular pathologies have been reported to both support and undermine mitochondrial function. For the latter case, mitochondrial toxicity is the consequence of drug interference (direct or off-target effects) with mitochondrial respiration/energy conversion, DNA replication, ROS production and detoxification, cell death signaling and mitochondrial dynamics. The present narrative review aims to summarize the beneficial and deleterious mitochondrial effects of common cardiovascular medications as described in various experimental models and identify those for which evidence for both types of effects is available in the literature.

Challenges and Future of Drug-Induced Liver Injury Research-Laboratory Tests

Drug-induced liver injury (DILI) is a rare but potentially severe adverse drug event, which is also a major cause of study cessation and market withdrawal during drug development. Since no acknowledged diagnostic tests are available, DILI diagnosis poses a major challenge both in clinical practice as well as in pharmacovigilance. Differentiation from other liver diseases and the identification of the causative agent in the case of polymedication are the main issues that clinicians and drug developers face in this regard. Thus, efforts have been made to establish diagnostic testing methods and biomarkers in order to safely diagnose DILI and ensure a distinguishment from alternative liver pathologies. This review provides an overview of the diagnostic methods used in differential diagnosis, especially with regards to autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) and drug-induced autoimmune hepatitis (DI-AIH), in vitro causality methods using individual blood samples, biomarkers for diagnosis and severity prediction, as well as experimental predictive models utilized in pre-clinical settings during drug development regimes.

Signal Detection of Potential Hepatotoxic Drugs: Case-Control Study Using Both a Spontaneous Reporting System and Electronic Medical Records

Drug-induced liver injury (DILI) is a common adverse drug event. Spontaneous reporting systems such as the Japanese Adverse Event Report Database (JADER) have been used to evaluate the association between drugs and adverse drug events. However, the association of drugs with adverse drug events may be overestimated due to reporting biases. Therefore, it is important to objectively evaluate the association using liver function test values. The aim of the present study was to predict potential hepatotoxic drugs using real-world data including electronic medical records and the JADER database. A total of 70009 (2779 with DILI and 67230 without DILI) and 438515 (10235 with DILI and 428280 without DILI) Japanese adult patients were extracted from electronic medical records and the JADER database, respectively. Drugs with ≥100 DILI patients in both of the two databases were regarded as suspected drugs for DILI. We used multivariate logistic regression to evaluate the association between the suspected drugs and increased risk of DILI. Among the suspected drugs, broad-spectrum antibiotics such as meropenem, tazobactam/piperacillin and ceftriaxone were significantly associated with an increased risk of DILI, and meropenem had a greater risk of DILI in both of the two databases. Additionally, there were significant associations of mosapride and L-carbocisteine with increased risk of DILI. In addition to well-known associations between antibiotic drugs and DILI, mosapride and L-carbocisteine were found to be new potential signals of drugs causing hepatotoxicity. This study indicates potential hepatotoxic drugs that require further causality assessment.

Drug-Induced Liver Injury: Highlights and Controversies in the Recent Literature

Drug-induced liver injury (DILI) remains an important, yet challenging diagnosis for physicians. Each year, additional drugs are implicated in DILI and this year was no different, with more than 1400 articles published on the subject. This review examines some of the most significant highlights and controversies in DILI-related research over the past year and their implications for clinical practice. Several new drugs were approved by the US Food and Drug Administration including a number of drugs implicated in causing DILI, particularly among the chemotherapeutic classes. The COVID-19 pandemic was also a major focus of attention in 2020 and we discuss some of the notable aspects of COVID-19-related liver injury and its implications for diagnosing DILI. Updates in diagnostic and causality assessments related to DILI such as the Roussel Uclaf Causality Assessment Method are included, mindful that there is still no single biomarker or diagnostic tool to unequivocally diagnose DILI. Glutamate dehydrogenase received renewed attention as being more specific than alanine aminotransferase. There were a few new reports of previously unrecognized hepatotoxins, including immune modulators and novel gene therapy drugs that we highlight. Updates and new developments of previously described hepatotoxins, such as immune checkpoint inhibitors and anti-tuberculosis drugs are reviewed. Finally, novel technologies such as organoid culture systems to better predict DILI preclinically may be coming of age and determinants of hepatocyte loss, such as calculating P_ALT are poised to improve our current means of estimating DILI severity and the risk of acute liver failure.

Serum biomarkers of isoniazid-induced liver injury: Aminotransferases are insufficient, and OPN, L-FABP and HMGB1 can be promising novel biomarkers

Isoniazid (INH)-induced liver injury is a great challenge for tuberculosis treatment. Existing biomarkers cannot accurately determine the occurrence of this injury in the early stage. Therefore, developing early specific sensitive biomarkers of INH-induced liver injury is urgent. A rat model of liver injury was established with gastric infusion of INH or INH plus rifampicin (RFP). We examined seven potential novel serum biomarkers, namely, glutamate dehydrogenase (GLDH), liver-fatty acid-binding protein (L-FABP), high-mobility group box-1 (HMGB1), macrophage colony-stimulating factor receptor (MCSF1R), osteopontin (OPN), total cytokeratin 18 (K18), and caspase-cleaved cytokeratin-18 (ccK18), to evaluate their sensitivity and specificity on INH-induced liver injury. With the increase of drug dosage, combining with RFP and prolonging duration of administration, the liver injury was aggravated, showing as decreased weight of the rats, upgraded liver index and oxidative stress level, and histopathological changes of liver becoming marked. But the activity of serum aminotransferases decreased significantly. The area under the curve (AUC) of receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve of OPN, L-FABP, HMGB1, MCSF1R, and GLDH was 0.88, 0.87, 0.85, 0.71, and 0.70 (≥0.7), respectively, and 95% confidence interval of them did not include 0.5, with statistical significance, indicating their potential abilities to become biomarkers of INH-induced liver injury. In conclusion, we found traditional biomarkers ALT and AST were insufficient to discover the INH-induced liver injury accurately and OPN, L-FABP, and HMGB1 can be promising novel biomarkers.

Biomarkers of drug-induced liver injury: a mechanistic perspective through acetaminophen hepatotoxicity

Introduction: Liver injury induced by drugs is a serious clinical problem. Many circulating biomarkers for identifying and predicting drug-induced liver injury (DILI) have been proposed.Areas covered: Biomarkers are mainly predicated on the mechanistic understanding of the underlying DILI, often in the context of acetaminophen overdose. New panels of biomarkers have emerged that are related to recovery/regeneration rather than injury following DILI. We explore the clinical relevance and limitations of these new biomarkers including recent controversies. Extracellular vesicles have also emerged as a promising vector of biomarkers, although the biological role for EVs may limit their clinical usefulness. New technological approaches for biomarker discovery are also explored.Expert opinion: Recent clinical studies have validated the efficacy of some of these new biomarkers, cytokeratin-18, macrophage colony-stimulating factor receptor, and osteopontin for DILI prognosis. Low prevalence of DILI is an inherent limitation to DILI biomarker development. Furthering mechanistic understanding of DILI and leveraging technological advances (e.g. machine learning/omics) is necessary to improve upon the newest generation of biomarkers. The integration of omics approaches with machine learning has led to novel insights in cancer research and DILI research is poised to leverage these technologies for biomarker discovery and development.

Biomarkers of mitotoxicity after acute liver injury: Further insights into the interpretation of glutamate dehydrogenase

BACKGROUND

Acetaminophen (APAP) is a popular analgesic, but overdose causes acute liver injury and sometimes death. Decades of research have revealed that mitochondrial damage is central in the mechanisms of toxicity in rodents, but we know much less about the role of mitochondria in humans. Due to the challenge of procuring liver tissue from APAP overdose patients, non-invasive mechanistic biomarkers are necessary to translate the mechanisms of APAP hepatotoxicity from rodents to patients. It was recently proposed that the mitochondrial matrix enzyme glutamate dehydrogenase (GLDH) can be measured in circulation as a biomarker of mitochondrial damage. Early observations revealed that damaged mitochondria release their contents into the cytosol. It follows that those mitochondrial molecules become freely detectable in blood after cell death. On the other hand, intact mitochondria would not release their matrix contents and can be removed from serum or plasma by high-speed centrifugation. However, a recent study cast doubt on the interpretation of GLDH as a mitotoxicity biomarker by demonstrating that neither high-speed centrifugation nor repeated freezing and thawing to lyse mitochondria alter GLDH activity in serum from mice with drug-induced liver injury.

AIM

Here, we briefly review the evidence for mitochondrial damage in APAP hepatotoxicity and demonstrate that removal of intact mitochondria by centrifugation does not alter measured GLDH activity simply because GLDH within the mitochondrial matrix is not accessible for measurement. In addition, we show that freezing and thawing is insufficient for complete lysis of mitochondria.

RELEVANCE FOR PATIENTS

Our literature review and data support the interpretation that circulating GLDH is a biomarker of mitochondrial damage. Such mechanistic biomarkers are important to translate preclinical research to patients.