Reproducibility of magnetic resonance fingerprinting-based T1 mapping of the healthy prostate at 1.5 and 3.0 T: A proof-of-concept study

Repeatability of quantitative MR fingerprinting for T1 and T2 measurements of metastatic bone in prostate cancer patients

OBJECTIVES

MR fingerprinting (MRF) has the potential to quantify treatment response. This study evaluated the repeatability of MRF-derived T1 and T2 relaxation times in bone metastasis, bone, and muscle in patients with metastatic prostate cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This prospective single-centre study included same-day repeated MRF acquisitions from 20 patients (August 2019-October 2020). Phantom and human data were acquired on a 1.5-T MR scanner using a research MRF sequence outputting T1 and T2 maps. Regions of interest (ROIs) across three tissue types (bone metastasis, bone, muscle) were drawn on two separate acquisitions. Repeatability of T1 and T2 was assessed using Bland-Altman plots, together with repeatability (r) and intraclass correlation (ICC) coefficients. Mean T1 and T2 were reported per tissue type.

RESULTS

Twenty patients with metastatic prostate cancer (mean age, 70 years ± 8 (standard deviation)) were evaluated and bone metastasis (n = 44), normal-appearing bone (n = 14), and muscle (n = 20) ROIs were delineated. Relative repeatability of T1 measurements was 6.9% (bone metastasis), 32.6% (bone), 5.8% (muscle) and 21.8%, 32.2%, 16.1% for T2 measurements. The ICC of T1 was 0.97 (bone metastasis), 0.94 (bone), 0.96 (muscle); ICC of T2 was 0.94 (bone metastasis), 0.94 (bone), 0.91 (muscle). T1 values in bone metastasis were higher than in bone (p < 0.001). T2 values showed no difference between bone metastasis and bone (p = 0.5), but could separate active versus treated metastasis (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

MRF allows repeatable T1 and T2 measurements in bone metastasis, bone, and muscle in patients with primary prostate cancer. Such measurements may help quantify the treatment response of bone metastasis.

KEY POINTS

Question MR fingerprinting has the potential to characterise bone metastasis and its response to treatment. Findings Repeatability of MRF-based T1 measurements in bone metastasis and muscle was better than for T2. Clinical relevance MR fingerprinting allows repeatable T1 and T2 quantitative measurements in bone metastasis, bone, and muscle in patients with primary prostate cancer, which makes it potentially applicable for disease characterisation and assessment of treatment response.

Incorporating Spatial and Spectral Saturation Modules Into MR Fingerprinting

In this work, we introduce spatial and chemical saturation options for artefact reduction in magnetic resonance fingerprinting (MRF) and assess their impact on T1 and T2 mapping accuracy. An existing radial MRF pulse sequence was modified to enable spatial and chemical saturation. Phantom experiments were performed to demonstrate flow artefact reduction and evaluate the accuracy of the T1 and T2 maps. As an in vivo demonstration, MRF of the prostate was performed on an asymptomatic volunteer using saturation modules to reduce flow-related artefacts. T1, T2 and B1 + maps obtained with and without saturation modules were compared. Application of spatial saturation in prostate MRF reduced streaking artefacts from the femoral vessels. When saturation is enabled T1 accuracy is preserved, and T2 accuracy remains acceptable up to approximately 100 ms. Chemical and spatial saturation can be incorporated into MRF sequences with limited impact on T1 accuracy. Further sequence optimisation may be needed to accurately estimate long T2 components. Spatial saturation modules have potential in prostate MRF applications as a means to reduce flow-related artefacts.

Magnetic Resonance Fingerprinting: A Review of Clinical Applications

ABSTRACT

Magnetic resonance fingerprinting (MRF) is an approach to quantitative magnetic resonance imaging that allows for efficient simultaneous measurements of multiple tissue properties, which are then used to create accurate and reproducible quantitative maps of these properties. As the technique has gained popularity, the extent of preclinical and clinical applications has vastly increased. The goal of this review is to provide an overview of currently investigated preclinical and clinical applications of MRF, as well as future directions. Topics covered include MRF in neuroimaging, neurovascular, prostate, liver, kidney, breast, abdominal quantitative imaging, cardiac, and musculoskeletal applications.

Magnetic resonance fingerprinting based comprehensive quantification of T1 and T2 values of the background prostatic peripheral zone: Correlation with clinical and demographic features

PURPOSE

To quantify and assess the distribution of MR fingerprinting (MRF)-derived T1 and T2 values of the whole prostatic peripheral zone (PZ), and perform subgroup analyses according to clinical and demographic features.

METHOD

One hundred and twenty-four patients with prostate MR exams and MRF-based T1 and T2 maps of the prostatic apex, mid gland, and base were identified from our database and included. Regions of interest encompassing the right and left lobes of the PZ were drawn for each axial slice on the T2 map and copied to the T1 map. Clinical data were obtained from medical records. Kruskal-Wallis test was used for assessing differences between subgroups and the Spearman coefficient was used for assessing any correlations.

RESULTS

Mean T1 and T2 values were 1941 and 88 ms, respectively, for the whole-gland, 1884 and 83 ms for the apex, 1974 and 92 ms for the mid-gland, 1966 and 88 ms for the base. T1 values were weakly negatively correlated with PSA values, while T1 and T2 values were weakly positively correlated with prostate weight and moderately positively correlated with PZ width. Finally, patients with PI-RADS 1 scores had higher T1 and T2 values of the whole PZ, compared with those with scores 2-5.

CONCLUSION

Mean T1 and T2 values of the background PZ of the whole gland were 1941 ± 313 and 88 ± 39 ms, respectively. Among clinical and demographic factors, there was a significant positive correlation between T1 and T2 values and PZ width.

Multicenter Repeatability and Reproducibility of MR Fingerprinting in Phantoms and in Prostatic Tissue

PURPOSE

To evaluate multicenter repeatability and reproducibility of T1 and T2 maps generated using MR fingerprinting (MRF) in the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine/National Institute of Standards and Technology MRI system phantom and in prostatic tissues.

METHODS

MRF experiments were performed on 5 different 3 Tesla MRI scanners at 3 different institutions: University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center (Cleveland, OH), Brigham and Women's Hospital (Boston, MA) in the United States, and Diagnosticos da America (Rio de Janeiro, RJ) in Brazil. Raw MRF data were reconstructed using a Gadgetron-based MRF online reconstruction pipeline to yield quantitative T1 and T2 maps. The repeatability of T1 and T2 values over 6 measurements in the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine/National Institute of Standards and Technology MRI system phantom was assessed to demonstrate intrascanner variation. The reproducibility between the 4 clinical scanners was assessed to demonstrate interscanner variation. The same-day test-retest normal prostate mean T1 and T2 values from peripheral zone and transitional zone were also compared using the intraclass correlation coefficient and Bland-Altman analysis.

RESULTS

The intrascanner variation of values measured using MRF was less than 2% for T1 and 4.7% for T2 for relaxation values, within the range of 307.7 to 2360 ms for T1 and 19.1 to 248.5 ms for T2 . Interscanner measurements showed that the T1 variation was less than 4.9%, and T2 variation was less than 8.1% between multicenter scanners. Both T1 and T2 values in in vivo prostatic tissue demonstrated high test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient > 0.92) and strong linear correlation (R2  > 0.840).

CONCLUSION

Prostate MRF measurements of T1 and T2 are repeatable and reproducible between MRI scanners at different centers on different continents for the above measurement ranges.

MR fingerprinting of the prostate

Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) has been adopted as the key tool for detection, localization, characterization, and risk stratification of patients suspected to have prostate cancer. Despite advantages over systematic biopsy, the interpretation of prostate mpMRI has limitations including a steep learning curve, leading to considerable interobserver variation. There is growing interest in clinical translation of quantitative imaging techniques for more objective lesion assessment. However, traditional mapping techniques are slow, precluding their use in the clinic. Magnetic resonance fingerprinting (MRF) is an efficient approach for quantitative maps of multiple tissue properties simultaneously. The T1 and T2 values obtained with MRF have been validated with phantom studies as well as in normal volunteers and patients. Studies have shown that MRF-derived T1 and T2 along with ADC values are all significant independent predictors in the differentiation between normal prostate tissue and prostate cancer, and hold promise in differentiating low and intermediate/high-grade cancers. This review seeks to introduce the basics of the prostate MRF technique, discuss the potential applications of prostate MRF for the characterization of prostate cancer, and describes ongoing areas of research.

Current Applications and Future Development of Magnetic Resonance Fingerprinting in Diagnosis, Characterization, and Response Monitoring in Cancer

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has enabled non-invasive cancer diagnosis, monitoring, and management in common clinical settings. However, inadequate quantitative analyses in MRI continue to limit its full potential and these often have an impact on clinicians' judgments. Magnetic resonance fingerprinting (MRF) has recently been introduced to acquire multiple quantitative parameters simultaneously in a reasonable timeframe. Initial retrospective studies have demonstrated the feasibility of using MRF for various cancer characterizations. Further trials with larger cohorts are still needed to explore the repeatability and reproducibility of the data acquired by MRF. At the moment, technical difficulties such as undesirable processing time or lack of motion robustness are limiting further implementations of MRF in clinical oncology. This review summarises the latest findings and technology developments for the use of MRF in cancer management and suggests possible future implications of MRF in characterizing tumour heterogeneity and response assessment.