Prevalence of colorectal cancer biomarkers and their impact on clinical outcomes in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia

Exploring somatic mutations in BRAF, KRAS, and NRAS as therapeutic targets in Saudi colorectal cancer patients through massive parallel sequencing and variant classification

Background

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the leading cancer among Saudis, and mutations in BRAF, KRAS, and NRAS genes are therapeutically significant due to their association with pathways critical for cell cycle regulation. This study evaluates the prevalence and frequency of somatic mutations in these actionable genes in Saudi CRC patients and assesses their pathogenicity with bioinformatics methods.

Methodology

The study employed the TruSight Tumor 15 next-generation sequencing (NGS) panel on 86 colorectal cancer (CRC) samples to detect somatic mutations in BRAF, KRAS, and NRAS genes. Bioinformatic analyses of NGS sequences included variant annotation with ANNOVAR, pathogenicity prediction, variant reclassification with CancerVar, and extensive structural analysis. Additionally, molecular docking assessed the binding of Encorafenib to wild-type and mutant BRAF proteins, providing insights into the therapeutic relevance of pathogenic variants.

Results

Out of 86 tumor samples, 40 (46.5%) harbored somatic mutations within actionable genes (BRAF: 2.3%, KRAS: 43%, NRAS: 2.3%). Fourteen missense variants were identified (BRAF: n = 1, KRAS: n = 11, NRAS: n = 2). Variants with strong clinical significance included BRAF V600E (2.32%) and KRAS G12D (18.60%). Variants with potential clinical significance included several KRAS and an NRAS mutation, while variants of unknown significance included KRAS E49K and NRAS R102Q. One variant was novel: NRAS R102Q, and two were rare: KRAS E49K and G138E. We further extended the CancerVar prediction capability by adding new pathogenicity prediction tools. Molecular docking demonstrated that Encorafenib inhibits the V600E variant BRAF protein less effectively compared to its wild-type counterpart.

Conclusion

Overall, this study highlights the importance of comprehensive molecular screening and bioinformatics in understanding the mutational landscape of CRC in the Saudi population, ultimately improving targeted drug treatments.

Cancer Biomarkers and Precision Oncology: A Review of Recent Trends and Innovations

The discovery of cancer-specific biomarkers has resulted in major advancements in the field of cancer diagnostics and therapeutics, therefore significantly lowering cancer-related morbidity and mortality. Cancer biomarkers can be generally classified as prognostic biomarkers that predict specific disease outcomes and predictive biomarkers that predict disease response to targeted therapeutic interventions. As research in the area of predictive biomarkers continues to grow, precision medicine becomes far more integrated in cancer treatment. This article presents a general overview on the most recent advancements in the area of cancer biomarkers, immunotherapy, artificial intelligence, and pharmacogenomics of the Middle East.

BRAF mutations and the association of V600E with CD133 and CDX2 expression in a Pakistani colorectal carcinoma cohort

BACKGROUND

Despite a high incidence of colorectal carcinoma, data regarding genetic aberrations in colorectal carcinoma (CRC) patients in Pakistan is scarce. This study aimed to determine the frequency of BRAFV600E mutations in colorectal carcinoma tissue in the Pakistani population and to associate BRAFV600E expression with CD133, a marker of colorectal stem cells, and CDX2 marker of differentiation.

METHODS

Sanger Sequencing of exon 15 (426 bp) including the hotspot V600E was performed on formalin-fixed-paraffin-embedded (FFPE) CRC tissue samples of 115 patients. The samples were subjected to immunohistochemistry (IHC) to assess the expression of BRAFV600E, CDX2, and CD133. Additionally, homology modelling and docking were performed to investigate novel deletions revealed in sequencing.

RESULTS

Twenty-four (20.8%) BRAF variants were identified in the coding region, with V600E mutations detected in 14 (12.2% )cases (GenBank: PP003258.1; Pop Set: 2678087296). Moreover, a wide spectrum of novel non-V600E mutations (8.6%) were identified, including deletions and missense variations. In-silico analysis revealed that due to large deletions in the coding region of three samples, the affinity of the anti-BRAF drugs (Encorafenib and Vemurafenib) for the active site decreased in comparison to the wild type. The IHC analysis showed that BRAFV600E expression was significantly associated with CD133 expression (χ2(1, n=115) = 26.351; p = < 0.001) and with CDX2 expression (χ2(1, n=115) = 14.88; p = 0.001). Multivariate analysis using binary logistic regression revealed association of BRAFV600E mutations with age (OR = 1.123; CI = 1.024-1.232; p = 0.014), gender (OR = 0.071; CI = 0.006-0.831; p = 0.035), grade (0.007; CI = 0-0.644) and CD133 expression (OR = 65.649; CI = 2.153-2001.556; p = 0.016).

CONCLUSION

The present study demonstrates a notably high V600E frequency (12.2%) in comparison to global reported data, which ranges from 0.4 to 18%. This finding reflects the importance of upfront BRAF testing of the genetically distinct population of Pakistan. Previously unreported mutations identified in the sample may be of clinical significance and warrant further investigation. The concomitant high expression and significant association between CD133 and BRAFV600E represent vital actionable genes that may be targeted together to improve CRC patient management.

KRAS/NRAS Mutations Associated with Distant Metastasis and BRAF/PIK3CA Mutations Associated with Poor Tumor Differentiation in Colorectal Cancer

Background

The occurrence, progression, and prognosis of colorectal cancer (CRC) are regulated by EGFR-mediated signaling pathways. However, the relationship between the core genes (KRAS/NRAS/BRAF/PIK3CA) status in the signaling pathways and clinicopathological characteristics of CRC patients in Hakka population remains controversial.

Methods

Patients were genotyped for KRAS (codons 12, 13, 61, 117, and 146), NRAS (codons 12, 61, 117, and 146), BRAF (codons 600), and PIK3CA (codons 542, 545 and 1047) mutations. Clinical records were collected, and clinicopathological characteristic associations were analyzed together with mutations of studied genes.

Results

Four hundred and eight patients (256 men and 152 women) were included in the analysis. At least one mutation in the four genes was detected in 216 (52.9%) patients, while none was detected in 192 (47.1%) patients. KRAS, NRAS, BRAF, and PIK3CA mutation status were detected in 190 (46.6%), 11 (2.7%), 10 (2.5%), 34 (8.3%) samples, respectively. KRAS exon 2 had the highest proportion (62.5%). Age, tumor site, tumor size, lymphovascular invasion, and perineural invasion were not associated with gene mutations. KRAS mutations (adjusted OR 1.675, 95% CI 1.017-2.760, P=0.043) and NRAS mutations (adjusted OR 5.183, 95% CI 1.239-21.687, P=0.024) appeared more frequently in patients with distant metastasis. BRAF mutations (adjusted OR 7.224, 95% CI 1.356-38.488, P=0.021) and PIK3CA mutations (adjusted OR 3.811, 95% CI 1.268-11.455, P=0.017) associated with poorly differentiated tumor.

Conclusion

KRAS/NRAS mutations are associated with distant metastasis and BRAF/PIK3CA mutations are associated with poor tumor differentiation in CRC. And the results provided a better understanding between clinicopathological characteristics and gene mutations in CRC patients.

Molecular pathology of colorectal cancer: The Saudi situation in perspective

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the most common cancers worldwide, and one of the most common causes of cancer deaths. In recent times, significant advancements have been made in elucidating the molecular alterations of the disease, and the results have been an improved understanding of CRC biology, as well as the discovery of biomarkers of diagnostic, prognostic, and therapeutic significance. In this review, an evaluation is carried out of the molecular pathology research of CRC emanating from Saudi Arabia. The verdict is that the data on the molecular alterations in CRC from Saudi patients is at best modest. This dearth of molecular pathology data is aptly reflected in the paucity of molecular markers recommended for testing by the Saudi National Cancer Centre guidelines for CRC management. Large scale multi-institutional and multiregional translational studies are required to generate molecular data that would inform diagnostic, prognostic, and risk-stratification guidelines for Saudi CRC patients.

Carbon-Based Nanomaterials as Drug Delivery Agents for Colorectal Cancer: Clinical Preface to Colorectal Cancer Citing Their Markers and Existing Theranostic Approaches

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the universally established cancers with a higher incidence rate. Novel progression toward cancer prevention and cancer care among countries in transition should be considered seriously for controlling CRC. Hence, several cutting edge technologies are ongoing for high performance cancer therapeutics over the past few decades. Several drug-delivery systems of the nanoregime are relatively new in this arena compared to the previous treatment modes such as chemo- or radiotherapy to mitigate cancer. Based on this background, the epidemiology, pathophysiology, clinical presentation, treatment possibilities, and theragnostic markers for CRC were revealed. Since the use of carbon nanotubes (CNTs) for the management of CRC has been less studied, the present review analyzes the preclinical studies on the application of carbon nanotubes for drug delivery and CRC therapy owing to their inherent properties. It also investigates the toxicity of CNTs on normal cells for safety testing and the clinical use of carbon nanoparticles (CNPs) for tumor localization. To conclude, this review recommends the clinical application of carbon-based nanomaterials further for the management of CRC in diagnosis and as carriers or therapeutic adjuvants.

A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis on the Occurrence of Biomarker Mutation in Colorectal Cancer among the Asian Population

Globally, colorectal carcinoma (CRC) is the third most common cancer and the third major cause of cancer-related death in both sexes. KRAS and BRAF mutations are almost mutually exclusively involved in the pathogenesis of CRC. Both are major culprits in treatment failure and poor prognosis for CRC. Method. A systematic review and meta-analysis of various research was done following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. This trial is registered with PROSPERO CRD42021256452. The initial search included 646 articles; after the removal of noneligible studies, a total of 88 studies was finally selected. Data analysis was carried out using OpenMeta Analyst and Comprehensive Meta-Analysis 3.0 (CMA 3.0) software to investigate the prevalence of KRAS and BRAF mutations among patients with CRC in Asia. Results. The meta-analysis comprises of 25,525 sample sizes from Asia with most being male 15,743/25525 (61.7%). Overall prevalence of KRAS mutations was (59/88) 36.3% (95% CI: 34.5-38.2) with I 2 = 85.54% (P value < 0.001). In 43/59 studies, frequency of KRAS mutations was majorly in codon 12 (76.6% (95% CI: 74.2-78.0)) and less in codon 13 (21.0% (95% CI: 19.1-23.0)). Overall prevalence of BRAF mutations was 5.6% (95% CI: 3.9-8.0) with I 2 = 94.00% (P value < 0.001). When stratified according to location, a higher prevalence was observed in Indonesia (71.8%) while Pakistan has the lowest (13.5%). Conclusion. Total prevalence of KRAS and BRAF mutations in CRC was 36.6% and 5.6%, respectively, and the results conformed with several published studies on KRAS and BRAF mutations.

KRAS/NRAS/BRAF Mutation Rate in Saudi Academic Hospital Patients With Colorectal Cancer

Background: KRAS/NRAS/BRAF mutations are prognostic and predictive molecular biomarkers for colorectal cancers (CRCs). CRC has different frequencies in the population for mutations such as KRAS, NRAS, and BRAF. The aim of this study is to verify the frequency of the somatic KRAS/NRAS/BRAF mutations in Saudi academic hospital patients diagnosed with CRC and compare it with those estimated at the local and national levels.

Methods: Out of 280 colorectal carcinomas diagnosed between 2018 and 2021 (primary and secondary), 97 (34.6%) were evaluated by Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) for colorectal cancer molecular markers. Four of these failed the PCR amplification, while 93 were successfully tested. KRAS, NRAS, and BRAF mutation rates and clinical pathological characteristics were recorded.

Results: In this retrospective study, almost half of the tested samples were reported to have a clinically significant mutation (46/93 positive calls, while others were triple-negative). We found that the most prevalent mutation in KRAS (45.2%) was followed by NRAS (2.2%) and BRAF (2.2%). KRAS p.G12D accounted for the most frequently resulting variant (17/42, 40.5%). Second in ranking is KRAS p. G12V (6/42, 14.3%).

Conclusion: This study is the first to describe the frequency of triple mutations in the city of Jeddah. The findings are consistent with previous research conducted in the Middle East and other local Saudi centers.

KRAS Mutations in Colorectal Cancer: Relationship With Clinicopathological Characteristics and Impact on Clinical Outcomes in Saudi Arabia

Background

Few studies have addressed the prevalence and prognostic impacts of KRAS mutations in Saudi patients with colorectal cancer (CRC). The present study aimed to address the prevalence of KRAS mutations and evaluate their impact on clinical outcomes (if any) among Saudi patients.

Methods

This retrospective cohort study was conducted at King Saud University Medical Centre (KSUMC), Saudi Arabia. All medical records of biopsy-proven CRC patients between 2015 and 2021 were reviewed. Statistical analysis was carried out to address the associations between KRAS mutations and the clinicopathological patients’ variables and survival.

Results

KRAS mutations were found in 97/194 (50%) CRC patients. In comparison to wild type KRAS tumors, KRAS- mutated ones had shown a trend toward right-sided tumors (30% and 4.3% vs 16% and 1.1%, p-value = 0.032, respectively) and peritoneal metastases (34% vs 19%, p-value = 0.014). Older age at diagnosis, gender, tumor grade, microsatellite instability (MSI), tumor stage (T), and the presence of distant metastasis were independent prognostic factors for poor overall survival (OS). There was no significant association between KRAS mutations and the hazard of mortality (HR: 0.653, 95% CI 0.873-1.134, p = 0.131). For progression-free survival (PFS), older age at presentation, MSI, tumor nodal stage (N), the presence of liver and lung metastasis, and recurrence were poor prognostic factors for PFS. There was no significant relation between KRAS mutations and PFS (HR ratio: 0.756, 95% CI 0.229-2.497, p = 0.646).

Conclusions

The prevalence of KRAS mutations in CRC patients was similar to that observed in previous studies of Saudi patients. KRAS mutations showed a trend toward right-sided tumors and peritoneal metastases. Survival was significantly related to different clinicopathologic variables of the study cohort but was not affected by the KRAS mutational status.