Effectiveness of anti-vascular endothelial growth factors in neovascular age-related macular degeneration and variables associated with visual acuity outcomes: Results from the EAGLE study

Efficacy and Safety of Brolucizumab for Diabetic Macular Edema: The KINGFISHER Randomized Clinical Trial

Importance

Despite the effectiveness of existing anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) therapies, a need remains for further treatment options to improve response rates and/or reduce injection or monitoring frequency in patients with diabetic macular edema (DME).

Objective

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of brolucizumab vs aflibercept dosed every 4 weeks in participants with DME.

Design, Participants, and Setting

This 52-week, double-masked, phase 3 randomized clinical trial included treatment-naive adults and adults who had previously received anti-VEGF therapy. Data were collected from September 2019 to March 2020, and data were analyzed from April 2020 to February 2021.

Intervention

Brolucizumab, 6 mg, intravitreal injection every 4 weeks or aflibercept, 2 mg, intravitreal injection every 4 weeks.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Participants were randomized 2:1 to brolucizumab, 6 mg, or aflibercept, 2 mg. The primary end point was change from baseline in best-corrected visual acuity at week 52. Secondary end points were the proportion of participants with a 2-step improvement or greater from baseline in Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale score, the proportion of eyes with absence of both subretinal fluid and intraretinal fluid, change from baseline in central subfield thickness, and safety at week 52.

Results

A total of 517 participants were randomized to brolucizumab (n = 346) or aflibercept (n = 171); 299 (57.8%) were male, and the mean (SD) age was 60.7 (10.2) years. Brolucizumab was noninferior to aflibercept in best-corrected visual acuity (Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study letter score) change from baseline at week 52 (brolucizumab, 12.2-letter improvement; aflibercept, 11.0-letter improvement; difference, 1.1; 95% CI, -0.6 to 2.9; noninferiority margin, 4; P < .001). Brolucizumab was superior to aflibercept for the proportion of eyes without subretinal and intraretinal fluid (brolucizumab, 144 of 346 [41.6%]; aflibercept, 38 of 171 [22.2%]; difference, 20.0%; 95% CI, 12.5to 28.6; P < .001) and mean central subfield thickness change from baseline at week 52 (brolucizumab, -237.8 μm; aflibercept, -196.5 μm; difference, -41.4; 95% CI, -58.9 to -23.8; P < .001). Incidence of intraocular inflammation was 4.0% (14 of 346) in the brolucizumab arm and 2.9% (5 of 171) in the aflibercept arm, incidence of retinal vasculitis was 0.9% (3 of 346) and 0.6% (1 of 171), respectively, and incidence of retinal vascular occlusion was 0.3% (1 of 346) and 0.6% (1 of 171). One participant in the brolucizumab arm had retinal artery occlusion.

Conclusions and Relevance

In these study participants with DME, no clinically meaningful differences in visual outcomes were noted between the brolucizumab and aflibercept arms; some superior anatomic improvements were noted in the brolucizumab arm. No new safety concerns were identified.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03917472.

Association between structural and functional treatment outcomes in neovascular age-related macular degeneration

PURPOSE

The administration frequency of intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) in neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD) have been widely discussed. The primary objective of the study was to explore the association between anatomical outcomes and changes in functional outcome.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study of patients with newly diagnosed neovascular AMD with a minimum of 12 months of follow-up. Only one eye per patient was included. Patients were treated according to the observe-and-plan or the pro-re-nata regimen. All patients were regularly examined from the time of diagnosis up to 24 months. The effect of intraretinal fluid (IRF), subretinal fluid (SRF) and pigment epithelium detachment (PED) at any time point on visual acuity (VA) was tested, as well as the long-term effect and the risk of losing VA. Further, the variability of central retinal thickness (CRT) was calculated for each eyes' individual measures during the observation period, excluding the monthly loading phase. The prognostic effect of each factor on VA was estimated by regression analysis. The primary outcome measure was VA, which was correlated with the presence or absence of fluid, seen as IRF, SRF or PED.

RESULTS

A total of 504 treatment naïve eyes from 504 patients was included. The presence of IRF was associated with lower VA at all visits (p < 0.001). However, the presence of SRF or PED was not significantly associated with worse VA at any time point during the observation period. Patients in the upper quartile of CRT variance had a greater loss in VA after 12 and 24 months (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

In this retrospective cohort study, the presence of intraretinal fluid was associated with poorer visual outcome in neovascular AMD patients treated with anti-VEGF, but the presence of subretinal fluid and PEDs was not. This suggests that IRF is worse than subretinal fluid and PEDs for AMD outcomes and therefore requires the most intensive treatment. Further, we found that patients with the highest CRT variability during the study period had poorer visual outcomes after 12 and 24 months, indicating that stringent control of retinal fluid volume fluctuations is important to prevent visual acuity decline over time.

Characterizing Early Residual Fluid in Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration using Machine Learning in Routine Clinical Practice

PURPOSE

Neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) often requires intensive therapy with anti-VEGF injections. In prior post hoc studies, early residual fluid (ERF) after the loading phase was associated with poorer treatment outcomes. This retrospective study examined the impact of ERF on vision using machine learning (ML) methods in routine clinical practice.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort.

PARTICIPANTS

This study included treatment-naïve patients with nAMD who were initiated on anti-VEGF between 2012 and 2018, with at least 1 year of follow-up.

METHODS

Overall, 286 patients with nAMD were included. An ML algorithm quantified intraretinal fluid (IRF), subretinal fluid (SRF), and total retinal fluid from OCTs. The ERF group included those with fluid at week 12 and was further stratified by fluid subtype. Paired t tests and analysis of variance compared best visual acuity (BVA) and fluid among subgroups, and a quartile analysis correlated fluid volumes to week 52 BVA. The risk of ERF was predicted from baseline factors using 3 ML methods: Ridge logistic regression, k nearest neighbors classification, and support vector classification.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Mean change in BVA from baseline to week 52 according to week 12 fluid status.

RESULTS

At week 12, 58.4% of patients had ERF. The breakdown of those in the ERF group included SRF-only (45.5%), IRF-only (21.6%), and IRF and SRF (32.9%). The ERF and ERF-free groups had similar BVA gains from baseline to week 52 (+5.7 ± 15.4 vs. +4.9 ± 18; P = 0.69). Examining specific ERF subgroups revealed no significant differences among the IRF-only (+4.6 ± 16.4), SRF-only (+5.6 ± 12.5), and IRF and SRF (+6.6 ± 18.5, P = 0.93) groups. Quartile analysis of week 12 fluid revealed no predictive pattern for BVA gains. Three ML methods were developed to predict those at risk for ERF achieved equivalent performance, with F1 score of 0.73 to 0.76.

CONCLUSIONS

These results diverge from prior post hoc studies, in that there was no significant difference in long-term BVA gains between ERF and ERF-free cohorts, as well as between the week 12 fluid subgroups.

The Impact of Early Residual Fluid After Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Initiation in Patients With Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration: A Meta-Analysis Review

Fluid in neovascular age-related macular degeneration is often used to assess patient response to anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapy. Various studies theorize that early residual fluid (ERF), noted as persistence of intraretinal fluid and subretinal fluid after the anti-vascular endothelial growth factor loading phase (LP), may be predictive of visual outcomes. This meta-analysis examined the existing literature on the relationship between ERF and long-term visual acuity (VA) and found that those who were fluid-free after the LP tended to have the highest VA gains overall. Early intraretinal fluid appeared to be associated with reduced VA gains, whereas the impact of early sub-retinal fluid was more debated. For those with ERF, monthly or more frequent dosing regimens following the LP appeared most optimal for VA. As most studies in this review were post hoc analyses, this highlights the need for real-world studies investigating ERF and its effect on visual outcomes in neovascular age-related macular degeneration. [Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina 2022;53:506-513.].

Retrospective Analysis of the Pharmaco-Utilization of VEGF Inhibitors and Health Care Costs among Patients with Wet Age-Related Macular Degeneration and Other Ocular Diseases in Italy

This Italian retrospective study aimed to analyze the pharmaco-utilization of anti-VEGF drugs and health care costs among patients with wet age-related macular degeneration (wAMD) or other ocular diseases. A retrospective analysis was performed on administrative databases of Italian entities covering approximately six million individuals. Across January 2010–December 2017, patients aged ≥50 years with a prescription of intravitreal anti-VEGFs were included as “wAMD” patients [by wAMD hospitalization or intravitreal injections] or as “other ocular diseases” patients [by hospitalization for other ocular disorders or intravitreal injections, with concomitant diabetes diagnosis or dexamethasone treatment]. The date of first matching of inclusion criteria was index-date. wAMD-cohort. Overall, 3879 patients were included; at index-date, 82.2% were treated with Ranibizumab, 15.8% with Aflibercept, and 2% with Pegaptanib. During the follow-up, the mean/annual anti-VEGF prescription [3.6 (first-year)–0.8 (third-year)] and the total expenditure [5799.84 € (first-year)–3212.84 € (third-year)] decreased. Other ocular diseases-cohort. Overall, 2646 patients were enclosed; 85.9% were treated with Ranibizumab, 13.5% with Aflibercept, and 0.6% with Pegaptanib. During the follow-up, the mean/annual anti-VEGF prescription [3.3 (first-year)–0.5 (third-year)] and the total cost [7196.83 € (first-year)–5162.68 € (third-year)] decreased. This observational study highlighted a decline in anti-VEGF prescriptions over time in both cohorts, suggesting a trend of under-treatment that could worsen the patients’ clinical outcomes and increase health care resource consumption.