Computer tomography guided thoracoscopic resection of small pulmonary nodules in the hybrid theatre

Clinical application of optical and electromagnetic navigation system in CT-guided radiofrequency ablation of lung metastases

PURPOSE

To evaluate the clinical value of CT-guided radiofrequency ablation (RFA) in the diagnosis and treatment of pulmonary metastases under optical and electromagnetic navigation.

METHODS

Data on CT-guided radiofrequency ablation treatment of 93 metastatic lung lesions in 70 patients were retrospectively analyzed. There were 46 males and 24 females with a median age of 60.0 years (16-85 years). All lesions were ≤3cm in diameter. 57 patients were treated with 17 G radiofrequency ablation needle puncture directly ablated the lesion without biopsy, and 13 patients were treated with 16 G coaxial needle biopsy followed by radiofrequency ablation. There were 25 cases in the optical navigation group, 25 in the electromagnetic navigation group, and 20 in the non-navigation group. The navigation group was performed by primary interventionalists with less than 5 years of experience, and the non-navigation group was performed by interventionalists with more than 5 years of experience.

RESULT

All operations were successfully performed. There was no statistically significant difference in the overall distribution of follow-up results among the optical, electromagnetic, and no navigation groups. Complete ablation was achieved in 84 lesions (90.3%). 7 lesions showed incomplete ablation and were completely inactivated after repeat ablation. 2 lesions progressed locally, and one of them still had an increasing trend after repeat ablation. No serious complications occurred after the operation.

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment with optical and electromagnetic navigation systems by less experienced operators has similar outcomes to traditional treatments without navigational systems performed by more experienced operators.

Local Therapies for Metastatic Sarcoma: Why, When, and How?

Management of patients with advanced sarcoma has been evolving in recent decades, from a one-fit-all perspective to a more refined, personalized, and multidisciplinary approach. In parallel, the evolution of local therapies (radiotherapy, surgical and interventional radiology techniques) has contributed to the improvement of survival of patients with advanced sarcoma. In this article, we review the evidence regarding local treatments in advanced sarcoma, as well as its integration with systemic therapies, to provide the reader a wider and deeper perspective on the management of patients with metastatic sarcoma.

Evaluation of Accuracy and Performance of a Novel, Fully Gantry Integrated 3D Laser System for Computed Tomography Guided Needle Placement: A Phantom Study

The purpose of this phantom study was to compare the accuracy, speed and technical performance of CT guided needle placement using a conventional technique versus a novel, gantry integrated laser guidance system for both an expert and a novice. A total of 80 needle placements were performed in an abdominal phantom using conventional CT guidance and a laser guidance system. Analysis of pooled results of expert and novice showed a significant reduction of time (277 vs. 204 s, p = 0.001) and of the number of needle corrections (3.28 vs. 1.58, p < 0.001) required when using laser guidance versus conventional technique. No significant improvement in absolute (3.81 vs. 3.41 mm, p = 0.213) or angular deviation (2.85 vs. 2.18°, p = 0.079) was found. With either approach, the expert was significantly faster (conventional guidance: 207 s vs. 346 s, p < 0.001; laser guidance: 144 s vs. 264 s, p < 0.001) and required fewer needle corrections (conventional guidance: 4 vs. 3, p = 0.027; laser guidance: 2 vs. 1, p = 0.001) than the novice. The laser guidance system helped both the expert and the novice to perform CT guided interventions in a phantom faster and with fewer needle corrections compared to the conventional technique, while achieving similar accuracy.

Oncologic Outcome after Pulmonary Metastasectomy as Part of Multidisciplinary Treatment in a Tertiary Oncological Center

(1) Background: Pulmonary metastases are encountered in approximately one-third of patients with malignancies, especially from colorectal, lung, breast, and renal cancers, and sarcomas. Pulmonary metastasectomy is the ablative approach of choice, when possible, as part of the multidisciplinary effort to integrate and personalize the oncological treatment. (2) Methods: The study includes 58 consecutive cases of pulmonary metastasectomies, retrospectively analyzed, performed in 12 consecutive months, in which the pathology reports confirmed lung metastases. (3) Results: Most frequent pathological types of metastases were: 14 of colorectal cancer, 10 breast, 8 lung, and 8 sarcomas. At the time of primary cancer diagnosis, 14 patients (24.14%) were in the metastatic stage. The surgical approach was minimally invasive through uniportal VATS (Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery) in 3/4 of cases (43 patients, 74%). Almost 20% of resections were typical (lobectomy, segmentectomy). Lymphadenectomy was associated in almost 1/2 of patients and lymph node metastases were found in 11.11% of cases. The mortality rate (intraoperative and 90 days postoperative) is zero. The OS after pulmonary metastasectomy is 87% at 18 months, and the estimated OS for cancer is 90% at 5 years. The worst outcome presents the patients with sarcomas and the best outcome-colorectal and lung cancer. The patients with 1 or 2 resected metastases presented 96% survival at 24 months. (4) Conclusions: After pulmonary metastasectomy, survival is favored by the small number of metastases resected (1 or 2), and by the dimension of metastases under 20.5 mm. The non-anatomic (wedge) type of lung resection may present a lower risk of death compared to lobectomy. No statistical significance on survival has the presence of lymphadenectomy, the laterality right/left lung, the upper/lower lobes. In the future, longer follow-up and prospective randomized trials are needed for drawing definitive conclusions.