Patient satisfaction, preferences, expectations, characteristics, and impact of suboptimal control of rheumatoid arthritis: A subgroup analysis of Japanese patients from a large international cohort study (SENSE)

Questionnaire Survey of Japanese Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease and Physicians on Shared Decision-Making in Advanced Therapy: A Web-Based PAIR Survey

Background/Aims

With the recent increase in available treatment options for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), shared decision-making has gained considerable importance. To address potential disparities in patient and physician priorities, we conducted a survey to clarify these perspectives.

Methods

Patients with IBD and physicians treating IBD were asked to complete an online questionnaire focused on key factors influencing drug selection and preferred drug administration methods.

Results

Responses were obtained from 400 patients (327 with ulcerative colitis and 73 with Crohn's disease) and 155 physicians. Among the factors in drug selection, physicians assigned significantly higher importance scores for experience with the drug than did patients. The expected time to onset of drug effects was significantly different between patients and physicians. Regarding preferences for drug administration method, patients and physicians assigned the highest acceptability scores for once-daily oral administration. For intravenous and subcutaneous routes, patients' scores were significantly lower than those of physicians' scores. Notably, 86.0% of patients and 62.0% of physicians preferred oral administration as the most preferred method. However, preferences varied based on treatment experience: 34.7% of patients with prior experience with subcutaneous injection preferred this method.

Conclusions

Patients and physicians generally shared similar priorities for drug selection; however, physicians emphasized their experience with the drug over patient preferences. Although the number of patients with prior treatment experience preferred intravenous or subcutaneous injections, oral formulations remained the preferred choice for both patients and physicians.

Approval status of essential therapeutic drugs for systemic sclerosis versus that of drugs for rheumatoid arthritis

Objective

Systemic sclerosis, a rare disease characterized by chronic multisystem fibrosis, requires lifelong management, necessitating enough insurance coverage for the patient. Official drug approval is the first step to ensuring that the drug is covered by insurance. In this study, we investigated the approval status of essential therapeutic drugs for systemic sclerosis across eight countries and compared it with that of drugs for rheumatoid arthritis.

Methods

The essential therapeutic drug lists for systemic sclerosis and rheumatoid arthritis were taken from the guidelines of the American College of Rheumatology and the European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology. Official drug approval status for the selected drugs was confirmed by searching representative Internet databases from eight countries: the United States, the United Kingdom, Germany, France, Italy, Switzerland, Japan, and the Republic of Korea.

Results

A total of 21 and 16 drugs were selected for systemic sclerosis and rheumatoid arthritis, respectively. The drug approval rates of the 21 drugs for systemic sclerosis varied among countries. Most drugs used to treat pulmonary arterial hypertension, which were developed recently and are expensive, are approved by most countries; however, most older drugs-which are still essential for management of Raynaud's phenomenon, digital ulcers, interstitial lung disease, and skin fibrosis-are not approved by most countries. By contrast, almost all of the 16 drugs used to treat rheumatoid arthritis, whether old or new, are approved by most countries.

Conclusion

Approval rates for drugs used to treat systemic sclerosis, a rare disease, are much lower than those for drugs used to treat rheumatoid arthritis. Thus, approval rates of essential therapeutic drugs for systemic sclerosis need to improve, which will benefit patients by increasing the number of drugs covered by insurance.

Satisfaction with medication in older adult patients with chronic respiratory diseases: a multicenter cross-sectional observational study

Purpose

To gain insight into medication satisfaction and factors associated with chronic respiratory disease, particularly chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in older adults, focusing on public health issues and improving the health of the older adult population.

Methods

This cross-sectional study was conducted from October 2022 to November 2022 in 24 hospitals in different regions of Hunan Province, China. Older adult patient treatment satisfaction was assessed using the Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication version II. Multiple regression analysis was used to identify factors independently associated with patient treatment satisfaction.

Results

Only 15.9% of all patients scored above 80 in the effectiveness domain, while 11.6 and 16.5% scored above 80 in the convenience and global satisfaction domains, respectively, while 17.3% reported having side effects. Interstitial lung disease was associated with lower drug satisfaction than other disorders (p < 0.05). Multifactorial regression analysis showed that age, education background, profession, and smoking status were independently associated with satisfaction among patients with chronic respiratory diseases (p < 0.05). Education background, profession, CAT score, number of acute exacerbations, duration of home oxygenation and duration of home ventilator use were independently associated with satisfaction in patients with COPD (p < 0.05).

Conclusion

Low satisfaction with chronic respiratory drug therapy was associated with age, education background, profession and smoking status. Satisfaction was lower for patients with interstitial lung disease. For COPD, CAT score, education background, profession, number of acute exacerbations, home oxygen and ventilator use influence satisfaction. Clinicians can identify appropriate patients and communicate effectively with them throughout treatment and follow-up, vigorously promote smoking cessation and home oxygen therapy, increase medication satisfaction, especially among older adults, and in turn improve public health and the quality of life of older adults.

Comparisons of treatment satisfaction and health-related quality of life in patients with rheumatoid arthritis treated with tofacitinib and adalimumab

BACKGROUND

As significant advances in the field of treatment for rheumatoid arthritis (RA), there is a great need to identify the healthcare outcomes such as treatment satisfaction and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of patients with various treatment options. This study aims to identify the difference in the treatment satisfaction and HRQoL of patients with RA using different treatment options, by comparing the treatment satisfaction and HRQoL in patients with RA treated with tofacitinib and adalimumab in real-world settings in Korea, using propensity score methods.

METHODS

In this non-interventional, multicenter, cross-sectional study (NCT03703817), a total of 410 patients with RA diagnosis were recruited in 21 university-based hospitals throughout Korea. The treatment satisfaction and HRQoL were assessed using the Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM) and EQ-5D questionnaires self-reported by the patients. This study compared outcomes between two drug groups in unweighted, greedy matching, and stabilized inverse probability of treatment weight (IPTW) samples using propensity score.

RESULTS

In all three samples, tofacitinib group showed higher convenience domain of TSQM than that in the adalimumab group, but not effectiveness, side effects, and global satisfaction domains. Multivariable analysis using the covariates of demographic and clinical characteristics of the participants also showed consistent results in TSQM. No statistical difference in EQ-5D-based HRQoL was identified between two drug groups in all three samples.

CONCLUSIONS

This study identified that tofacitinib shows higher treatment satisfaction in the convenience domain of TSQM rather than adalimumab, suggesting that various factors such as drug formulation, route or frequency of administration, and storage can have an impact on the treatment satisfaction, especially the convenience domain. These findings may be useful to patients and physicians when determining treatment options.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03703817.