Systematic screening for advanced liver fibrosis in patients with coronary artery disease: The CORONASH study

Suboptimal reliability of FIB-4 and NAFLD-fibrosis scores for staging of liver fibrosis in general population

Background and Aim

The burden and incidence of liver cirrhosis are increasing worldwide. Early detection of liver fibrosis would help in early interventions and preventing the progression of fibrosis and cirrhosis. The accepted noninvasive markers for liver fibrosis staging, namely fibrosis-4 (FIB-4) and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease fibrosis score (NFS), have shown inconsistent performance for detecting the fibrosis stage. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of FIB-4 score and NFS for the detection of liver fibrosis in the general population.

Methods

From a general population referred from a single, community-based family-physician clinic, we included study participants between the ages of 45 and 65 years, with no knowledge of liver disease and no record of alcohol consumption. Liver fibrosis was evaluated by the FIB-4 score and NFS using shear wave elastography (SWE) or transient elastography (TE) measurements as a reference.

Results

A total of 76 participants (aged 61.5 ± 0.37 years, 33% females) were included in the study cohort. We observed a nonsignificant correlation between liver stiffness measurement (LSM) and FIB-4 and NFS (r = 0.1, P = 0.37; r = 0.16, P = 0.15, respectively). Our results showed that only 5.2% with FIB-4 >3.25 and 9.7% with NFS >0.675 had LSM >12 kPa. The compatibility of fibrosis staging was 55% between FIB-4 score and LSM and only 18% between NFS and LSM.

Conclusion

We found that FIB-4 and NFS are unreliable tools for liver fibrosis estimation in the general population. There is a need for more reliable noninvasive methods for the early detection of liver fibrosis.

Non-invasive assessment of steatohepatitis indicates increased risk of coronary artery disease

INTRODUCTION

Fatty liver diseases (FLD), especially defined as metabolic dysfunction-associated FLD (MAFLD), is of growing importance for patients and health-care providers. Extrahepatic comorbidities, predominantly coronary artery disease (CAD), contribute to excess morbidity and mortality in FLD. Although the association of FLD and CAD is well known, underlying pathophysiological links are not fully understood. Non-invasive means of liver diagnostic enable a fast and thorough characterization of FLD. We therefore assessed the severity of FLD in a cohort of patients at risk of CAD.

METHODS

Patients scheduled for coronary angiography were characterized by anthropometry, serum-based indices of liver fibrosis (NFS, FIB4), abdominal ultrasound and vibration controlled transient elastography (VCTE) including controlled attenuation parameter (CAP) and the Fibroscan-AST (FAST) score. Patients were stratified according to indication of therapeutic coronary intervention.

RESULTS

120 patients were recruited, MAFLD was found in 41%, while advanced fibrosis or cirrhosis were present in only 5%. Coronary vascular intervention was indicated in 42% (n = 50). Severity of steatosis assessed by CAP and risk of fibrosis defined by elevated liver stiffness (VCTE>8 kPa) and fibrosis indices were associated with the need for coronary intervention. FAST score, a marker of fibrotic steatohepatitis, was elevated in the intervention group (0.22 vs. 0.12, p<0.001). Multivariate regression analysis revealed FAST score as strongest predictor of CAD (OR 2.3 95%, CI 1.40-2.96).

DISCUSSION

MAFLD is a frequent comorbidity in patients at CAD risk, but advanced liver disease has a low prevalence in patients undergoing elective coronary angiography. Therefore, a routine VCTE-based screening for FLD cannot be recommended in cardiac patients. The association of indicators of steatohepatitis with advanced CAD points to inflammatory processes as a conjoint mechanism of both diseases.

Fibrosis score 4 index has an independent relationship with coronary artery diseases in patients with metabolic-associated fatty liver disease

BACKGROUND

Metabolic-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD), one of the most common liver diseases, is detected in patients with concomitant hepatic steatosis and Type 2 Diabetes (T2D). We looked into the relationship between Fibrosis-4 (FIB-4) index and coronary artery diseases (CAD) in patients with MAFLD, to further look into the efficiency of FIB-4 in screening for CAD among patients with MAFLD.

METHOD

In this study, we included 1664 patients with MAFLD (T2D, who also had hepatic steatosis) during 2012-2022 and divided them into 2 groups; CAD and non-CAD. Demographic, Anthropometric indices, liver function tests, lipid profile and FIB-4 index of all patients were evaluated and compared.

RESULT

Among the 1644 patients (all have MAFLD), 364(21.4%) had CAD. Patients with MAFLD and CAD were more probable to be hypertensive, have longer duration of diabetes and be older (with p-values < 0.001). After adjustment for confounding factors, in a multivariable logistic regression model, FIB4 showed a significant independent relationship with concomitant MAFLD and CAD. Upper Tertile FIB-4 had an odds ratio of 3.28 (P-value = 0.002) to predict CAD. Furthermore, in Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) Curve analysis with the maximum Youden Index, a FIB-4 cut-off of 0.85 (AUC = 0.656, 95% CI 0.618-0.693, P < 0.001) noted to predict CAD in patients with MAFLD.

CONCLUSION

This study showed that the FIB-4 score independently correlates with CAD in patients with MAFLD.

New Insights into Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease and Coronary Artery Disease: The Liver-Heart Axis

Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) represents the hepatic expression of the metabolic syndrome and is the most prevalent liver disease. NAFLD is associated with liver-related and extrahepatic morbi-mortality. Among extrahepatic complications, cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the primary cause of mortality in patients with NAFLD. The most frequent clinical expression of CVD is the coronary artery disease (CAD). Epidemiological data support a link between CAD and NAFLD, underlain by pathogenic factors, such as the exacerbation of insulin resistance, genetic phenotype, oxidative stress, atherogenic dyslipidemia, pro-inflammatory mediators, and gut microbiota. A thorough assessment of cardiovascular risk and identification of all forms of CVD, especially CAD, are needed in all patients with NAFLD regardless of their metabolic status. Therefore, this narrative review aims to examine the available data on CAD seen in patients with NAFLD, to outline the main directions undertaken by the CVD risk assessment and the multiple putative underlying mechanisms implicated in the relationship between CAD and NAFLD, and to raise awareness about this underestimated association between two major, frequent and severe diseases.