1
|
Roohollahi F, Molavi S, Mohammadi M, Mohamadi M, Mohammadi A, Kankam SB, Farahbakhsh F, Moarrefdezfouli A, Peters ME, Albrecht JS, Gardner RC, Rahimi-Movaghar V. Prognostic Value of Frailty for Outcome Following Traumatic Brain Injury: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Neurotrauma 2024; 41:331-348. [PMID: 37416987 DOI: 10.1089/neu.2023.0176] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Frailty is a known predictor of negative health outcomes. The role of frailty in predicting outcomes after traumatic brain injury (TBI), however, is unclear. This systematic review aimed to evaluate the association between frailty and adverse outcomes in patients with TBI. We identified relevant articles that investigated the relationship between frailty and outcomes in patients with TBI by searching PubMed/MEDLINE, Web of Science, Scopus, and EMBASE from inception until 23 March 2023. To evaluate the risk of bias in the included studies, we utilized the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS). In addition, quantitative synthesis and meta-analyses were performed. We identified 12 studies that met our inclusion criteria; three were prospective. Of included studies, eight had low risk, three had moderate risk, and one had high risk of bias. Frailty was significantly associated with death in five studies, with an increased risk of in-hospital death and complications observed in frail patients. Frailty was associated with longer hospital stays and unfavorable outcome measured by the Extended Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOSE) in four studies. The meta-analysis found that higher frailty significantly increased the odds of non-routine discharge and unfavorable outcome as measured by GOSE scores of 4 or lower. The pooled odds ratio (OR) for non-routine discharge, was 1.80, with a 95% confidence interval (CI) of 1.15-2.84; and for unfavorable outcome, it was 1.91, with a 95% CI of 1.09-3.36. The analysis, however, did not find a significant predictive role for frailty on death (30-day or in-hospital death). The OR for higher frailty and death was 1.42 with a 95% CI of 0.92-2.19. Frailty should be considered in the evaluation of patients with TBI to identify those who may be at increased risk of negative outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Faramarz Roohollahi
- Department of Neurosurgery, Shariati Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
- Spine Center of Excellence , Yas Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Shervin Molavi
- Department of Neurosurgery, Shariati Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | | | - Mobin Mohamadi
- School of Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Aynaz Mohammadi
- School of Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Samuel Berchi Kankam
- Department of Neurosurgery, Shariati Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
- Spine Center of Excellence , Yas Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
- Sina Trauma and Surgery Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Farzin Farahbakhsh
- Sina Trauma and Surgery Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Azin Moarrefdezfouli
- Sina Trauma and Surgery Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Matthew E Peters
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Jennifer S Albrecht
- Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Raquel C Gardner
- Department of Neurology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Vafa Rahimi-Movaghar
- Sina Trauma and Surgery Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Seal K, Richmond B, Jain S, Minor J, Lasky TM, Reading L, Samanta D. Impact of Treatment Modalities on Discharge Disposition in Blunt Splenic Injuries. Cureus 2023; 15:e45987. [PMID: 37900500 PMCID: PMC10601512 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.45987] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/20/2023] [Indexed: 10/31/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Management of blunt splenic trauma has evolved over several decades, trending towards nonoperative management and splenic artery embolization. Extensive research has been conducted regarding the management of blunt splenic injuries, but there is little data on the association of treatment modality with discharge disposition. METHODS This is an observational retrospective study conducted at a level-one trauma center with blunt splenic trauma patients of age ≥18 years between January 2010 and December 2021. The primary outcome of unfavorable discharge was defined as discharge to an acute care facility, intermediate care facility, long-term care facility, rehabilitation (inpatient) facility, or skilled nursing facility. RESULTS Five hundred seventy-nine patients were included in the analysis, with 108 (18.7%) in the unfavorable group and 471 (81.3%) in the favorable group. Most patients were managed nonoperatively (69.3%), followed by splenectomy (25.0%) and embolization (5.7%). Due to the low number of embolizations performed during the study period, treatment modalities were grouped into two broad categories: intervention (embolization and splenectomies) and nonintervention. The treatment modality was found to have no significant impact on unfavorable discharge. Independent risk factors for unfavorable discharge included age >55 years, injury severity score (ISS) >15, hospital-acquired pneumonia, and in-hospital complications of sepsis. CONCLUSIONS This study provides an understanding of specific demographic and clinical factors that may predispose blunt splenic injury trauma patients to an unfavorable discharge. Providers may apply these data to identify at-risk patients and subsequently adapt the care they provide in an effort to prevent the development of in-hospital pneumonia and sepsis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kimberly Seal
- Vascular Surgery, Charleston Area Medical Center, West Virginia University, Charleston, USA
| | - Bryan Richmond
- General Surgery, Charleston Area Medical Center, West Virginia University, Charleston, USA
| | - Sachin Jain
- General Surgery, Charleston Area Medical Center, West Virginia University, Charleston, USA
| | - Jacob Minor
- General Surgery, Charleston Area Medical Center, West Virginia University, Charleston, USA
| | - Tiffany M Lasky
- Critical Care, Charleston Area Medical Center, West Virginia University, Charleston, USA
| | - Landon Reading
- Trauma, West Virginia School of Osteopathic Medicine, Charleston, USA
| | - Damayanti Samanta
- Trauma, Center for Health Services and Outcomes Research, Charleston Area Medical Center Institute for Academic Medicine, Charleston, USA
| |
Collapse
|