A qualitative study about how families coped with managing their well-being, children's physical activity and education during the COVID-19 school closures in England

Mental Health of Children With Special Educational Needs and the Return to In-Person Learning After the COVID-19 Pandemic

Importance

There is limited evidence on whether the quality of life and behavior of children with special educational needs (SEN) have improved or worsened since schools reopened after COVID-19-related school closures.

Objective

To describe the changes in the mental well-being of children and adolescents with SEN during the initial 6 months of resuming in-person learning after COVID-19-related school closures.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This repeated cross-sectional study reported data from surveys completed by parents and caregivers of children and adolescents aged 3 to 18 years with SEN studying at special schools in Hong Kong. The first cohort was obtained during COVID-19-related school closure in April 2020 (wave 1) and the second cohort was obtained 6 months after school resumption with data collection between July and October 2021 (wave 2). Data analysis occurred from January to June 2022.

Exposure

Diagnosis of a disability or disorder that required school-based special educational programming.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Children's emotional and behavioral difficulties (measured with the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire [SDQ]), quality of life (measured with the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory [PedsQL]), lifestyle habits, parental stress, and parental well-being (measured with the PedsQL Family Impact Module) were assessed. Cross-sectional comparisons of well-being between the 2 waves were conducted using analysis of covariance, and multiple regression analysis was performed to identify factors associated with mental health outcomes in wave 2.

Results

In wave 1, a total of 456 parents and caregivers of children with SEN (mean [SD] age, 7.44 [3.98] years; 315 boys [69.1%]; 141 girls [30.9%]) responded to the surveys. In wave 2, 519 parents and caregivers of children with SEN (mean [SD] age, 8.16 [4.47] years; 365 boys [70.3%]; 154 girls [29.7%]) responded. After school resumption, preschoolers aged 3 to 5 years with SEN had significantly fewer emotional difficulties (mean [SD] SDQ score, 3.26 [2.39] vs 2.68 [2.03]; standardized mean difference [SMD] = 0.26; 95% CI, 0.07-0.46; Bonferroni-corrected P = .04) and conduct difficulties (mean [SD] SDQ score, 2.88 [1.89] vs 2.41 [1.91]; SMD = 0.25; 95% CI, 0.05-0.44; Bonferroni-corrected P = .01), whereas adolescents had more conduct difficulties (mean [SD] SDQ score, 1.62 [1.50] vs 2.37 [3.02]; SMD = 0.41; 95% CI, 0.13-0.70; Bonferroni-corrected P = .049). The overall quality of life of school-aged children with SEN aged 6 to 11 years worsened after school resumption (mean [SD] PedsQL score, 67.52 [17.45] vs 60.57 [16.52]; SMD = 0.41; 95% CI, 0.19-0.62; Bonferroni-corrected P = .002).

Conclusions and Relevance

The findings of this repeated cross-sectional study suggest that preschoolers with SEN had improved emotional and behavioral functioning when school resumed after COVID-19-related closures. School-aged children with SEN, adolescents with SEN, and children with intellectual disabilities were at risk of reduced quality of life, indicating that additional support should be offered to vulnerable groups as they return to schools.

Parent-reported child's close contact with non-household family members and their well-being during the COVID-19 pandemic: A cross-sectional survey

In England (UK), at the start of the COVID-19 pandemic the public were required to reduce their physical contacts to slow the spread of COVID-19. We investigated the factors associated with children having: 1) close contact with family members from outside their household ('non-adherent behaviour'); and 2) low well-being (Revised Child Anxiety and Depression Scale). We conducted an online cross-sectional survey, completed at any location of the participant's choice between 8 and 11 June 2020 in parents (n = 2,010) who were aged eighteen years or over and had a school-aged child (4-18 years old). Parents reported that 15% (n = 309) of children had non-adherent contact and that 26% (n = 519) had low well-being. We used a series of binary logistic regressions to investigate associations between outcomes and child and parent characteristics. Children had higher odds of having non-household contact when they had special educational needs [adjusted odds ratio, 2.19 (95% CI, 1.47 to 3.27)], lower well-being [2.65 (95% CI, 2.03 to 3.46)], were vulnerable to COVID-19 [2.17 (95% CI, 1.45 to 3.25)], lived with someone who was over 70 years old [2.56 (95% CI, 1.55 to 4.24)] and their parent had low well-being [1.94 (95% CI, 1.45 to 2.58)]. Children had higher odds of lower well-being when they had special educational needs [4.13 (95% CI, 2.90 to 5.87)], were vulnerable to COVID-19 [3.06 (95% CI, 2.15 to 4.36)], lived with someone else who was vulnerable to COVID-19 [2.08 (95% CI, 1.64 to 2.64)], or lived with someone who was over 70 years old [2.41 (95% CI, 1.51 to 3.83)]. Many children came into contact with non-household family members, mainly for childcare. Factors relating to COVID-19, children's well-being and education were also important. If school closures are needed in future, addressing these issues may help reduce contact.

COVID-19's shadow on families: A structural equation model of parental stress, family relationships, and child wellbeing

The present study seeks to contribute to developmental science in emergencies by investigating associations between COVID-19 pandemic-related stressors, parents' stress, family relationships, and child wellbeing. In doing so, we build on recent research that generalizes the assumptions of the Family Stress Model beyond direct economic stressors of households to macro-contextual stressors that operate at the societal level. In the case of our study, these stressors relate to the COVID-19 pandemic, such as health risks and confinement-related stresses. Participants were 783 parents of young children (75% female, Mage = 34.61 years) residing in the United Arab Emirates. They completed an online survey in Fall 2020 and Spring 2021, measuring how the pandemic impacted their lives and the lives of their child (Mage = 47.54 months). A subsample of parents (n = 96) completed the survey for two children. Structural equation modeling showed that pandemic-related stressors contributed to higher stress among parents which, in turn, resulted in lower parent-reported child wellbeing at various times during the pandemic. Family relationships mediated the association between parents' stress and child wellbeing. The present study contributes to our understanding on how large-scale disruption due to COVID-19 pandemic-related stressors gets inside the family, the strength and direction of associations (concurrently and over time), and the timing of mechanisms that impact family processes. The results highlight the need to support families with young children in managing disruptions due to emergencies, such as a global public health crisis, and to determine ways of preventing longstanding consequences on family structures and children's lives.

Using photovoice to explore Bolivian children's experiences of COVID-19

Our capacity to facilitate the empowerment of children is dependent on our ability to understand their values and experiences. This study aimed to explore Bolivian children's experiences of COVID-19. This study used a participatory action research method, photovoice, which involved focus groups, individual interviews and the use of cameras by participants to capture their reality and express their ideas through photographs. Ten participants aged 12-15 years were recruited from a school in the municipality of Mecapaca in Bolivia. Thematic analysis was used to identify and report response patterns. Four themes were developed through analysis: (i) sadness and fear of getting sick, (ii) the challenges of online learning, (iii) the tension between traditional knowledge and modern medicine, and (iv) the role of nature and culture in supporting well-being-natural and cultural capital. The narratives and choice of images by the children illustrate some issues and experiences. These findings also highlighted the importance of considering and exploring how children's experiences and interactions with their habitat, nature and their physical environment impacts on their health and well-being.