Penicillin dosing for pneumococcal pneumonia

Alleviating penicillin-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae‑induced lung epithelial cell injury: mechanistic insights into effects of the optimized combination of main components from Yinhuapinggan granules

OBJECTIVE

Penicillin-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae (PRSP), for which novel treatment medicines are required, has expanded extensively due to the overuse of antibiotics. This study aimed to detect the optimal ratio of the combination of the main components based on Yinhuapinggan granules (YHPG) to generate novel treatment concepts for PRSP-induced lung injury.

METHODS

Three representative main components: chlorogenic acid (C), amygdalin (A), and puerarin (P) were selected, and the optimal combination of these three components was determined by an orthogonal experiment. Investigations were conducted on the potential mechanisms underlying the protective effect of this optimized combination against PRSP-induced lung epithelial cell damage. Meanwhile, the bacteriostatic effect was further explored through the optimized combination of these natural products combined with penicillin G (PG).

RESULTS

The optimized combination CAP (C: 16 µg/mL, A: 24 µg/mL, P: 24 µg/mL) screened by the orthogonal experimental design reduced cell damage in a model of human lung epithelial cells infected by PRSP, and the combination of CAP and PG had a synergistic effect. At the cellular level, CAP attenuated lung epithelial cell injury by modulating the TLRs/MyD88 inflammatory pathway. At the bacterial level, CAP modulated the virulence and drug resistance of PRSP, resulting in enhanced bacterial inhibition by the combination of CAP and PG.

CONCLUSION

Taken together, our results suggest that CAP can modulate or synergize with PG to modulate the TLRs/MyD88 pathway and attenuate PRSP-induced lung injury, and can be used as a potential drug for treating PRSP infection.

Systematic review of the clinical outcomes of pneumonia with a penicillin-group resistant pneumococcus in respiratory and blood culture specimens in children in low- and middle-income countries

Background

Streptococcus pneumoniae is one of the most common bacteria causing pneumonia and the World Health Organization (WHO) recommends first-line treatment of pneumonia with penicillins. Due to increases in the frequency of penicillin resistance, this systematic review aimed to determine the clinical outcomes of children with pneumonia in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), with penicillin-group resistant pneumococci in respiratory and/or blood cultures specimens.

Methods

English-language articles from January 2000 to November 2020 were identified by searching four databases. Systematic reviews and epidemiological studies from LMICs that included children aged one month to 9 years and reported outcomes of pneumonia with a penicillin-resistant pneumococcus in respiratory and blood culture specimens with or without comparison groups were included. Risk of bias was assessed using the Effective Public Health Practice Project (EPHPP) Quality Assessment Tool for Quantitative Studies. A narrative synthesis of findings based on the results of included studies was performed.

Results

We included 7 articles involving 2864 children. One strong- and four medium-quality studies showed no difference in clinical outcomes (duration of symptoms, length of hospital stay and mortality) between those children with penicillin non-susceptible compared to susceptible pneumococci. Two weak quality studies suggested better outcomes in the penicillin-susceptible group.

Conclusions

Current evidence suggests no difference in clinical outcomes of child pneumonia due to a penicillin-resistant S. pneumoniae and as such, there is no evidence to support a change in current WHO antibiotic guidelines.

Efficacy of high doses of penicillin versus amoxicillin in the treatment of uncomplicated community acquired pneumonia in adults. A non-inferiority controlled clinical trial

Introduction

Community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) is treated with penicillin in some northern European countries.

Objectives

To evaluate whether high-dose penicillin V is as effective as high-dose amoxicillin for the treatment of non-severe CAP.

Design

Multicentre, parallel, double-blind, controlled, randomized clinical trial.

Setting

31 primary care centers in Spain.

Participants

Patients from 18 to 75 years of age with no significant associated comorbidity and with symptoms of lower respiratory tract infection and radiological confirmation of CAP were randomized to receive either penicillin V 1.6 million units, or amoxicillin 1000 mg three times per day for 10 days.

Main measurements

The main outcome was clinical cure at 14 days, and the primary hypothesis was that penicillin V would be non-inferior to amoxicillin with regard to this outcome, with a margin of 15% for the difference in proportions. EudraCT register 2012-003511-63.

Results

A total of 43 subjects (amoxicillin: 28; penicillin: 15) were randomized. Clinical cure was observed in 10 (90.9%) patients assigned to penicillin and in 25 (100%) patients assigned to amoxicillin with a difference of −9.1% (95% CI, −41.3% to 6.4%; p = .951) for non-inferiority. In the intention-to-treat analysis, amoxicillin was found to be 28.6% superior to penicillin (95% CI, 7.3–58.1%; p = .009 for superiority). The number of adverse events was similar in both groups.

Conclusions

There was a trend favoring high-dose amoxicillin versus high-dose penicillin in adults with uncomplicated CAP. The main limitation of this trial was the low statistical power due to the low number of patients included.

Efficacy of high doses of oral penicillin versus amoxicillin in the treatment of adults with non-severe pneumonia attended in the community: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial

Background

Streptococcus pneumoniae is the bacterial agent which most frequently causes pneumonia. In some Scandinavian countries, this infection is treated with penicillin V since the resistances of pneumococci to this antibiotic are low. Four reasons justify the undertaking of this study; firstly, the cut-off points which determine whether a pneumococcus is susceptible or resistant to penicillin have changed in 2008 and according to some studies published recently the pneumococcal resistances to penicillin in Spain have fallen drastically, with only 0.9% of the strains being resistant to oral penicillin (minimum inhibitory concentration>2 μg/ml); secondly, there is no correlation between pneumococcal infection by a strain resistant to penicillin and therapeutic failure in pneumonia; thirdly, the use of narrow-spectrum antibiotics is urgently needed because of the dearth of new antimicrobials and the link observed between consumption of broad-spectrum antibiotics and emergence and spread of antibacterial resistance; and fourthly, no clinical study comparing amoxicillin and penicillin V in pneumonia in adults has been published. Our aim is to determine whether high-dose penicillin V is as effective as high-dose amoxicillin for the treatment of uncomplicated community-acquired pneumonia.

Methods

We will perform a parallel group, randomised, double-blind, trial in primary healthcare centres in Spain. Patients aged 18 to 65 without significant associated comorbidity attending the physician with signs and symptoms of lower respiratory tract infection and radiological confirmation of the diagnosis of pneumonia will be randomly assigned to either penicillin V 1.6 million units thrice-daily during 10 days or amoxicillin 1,000 mg thrice-daily during 10 days. The main outcome will be clinical cure at 14 days, defined as absence of fever, resolution or improvement of cough, improvement of general wellbeing and resolution or reduction of crackles indicating that no other antimicrobial treatment will be necessary. Any clinical result other than the anterior will be considered as treatment failure. A total of 210 patients will be recruited to detect a non-inferiority margin of 15% between the two treatments with a minimum power of 80% considering an alpha error of 2.5% for a unilateral hypothesis and maximum possible losses of 15%.

Discussion

This pragmatic trial addresses the long-standing hypothesis that the administration of high doses of a narrow-spectrum antibiotic (penicillin V) in patients with non-severe pneumonia attended in the community is not less effective than high doses of amoxicillin (treatment currently recommended) in patients under the age of 65 years.

Trial registration

EudraCT number 2012-003511-63.

Continuous-infusion penicillin home-based therapy for serious infections due to penicillin-susceptible pathogens

To evaluate the feasibility of continuous-infusion (CI) penicillin in the treatment of serious bacterial infections, consecutive adult patients with deep-seated infections due to penicillin-susceptible pathogens were treated with CI aqueous penicillin G in a home-based programme, and their treatment outcomes were reviewed. Thirty-one patients with microbiologically proven infections completed the planned course of treatment. Twenty of 31 (65%) were followed for at least 2 months thereafter, and all remained free of relapse. One patient had fever attributable to penicillin hypersensitivity, two patients developed catheter-site infections and one patient developed catheter-related bacteraemia. Thus, CI penicillin is feasible for the home-based treatment of a variety of deep-seated infections with minimal toxicity.

Severe pneumococcal pneumonia: new strategies for management

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Streptococcus pneumoniae is the leading cause of community-acquired pneumonia worldwide and is the most likely causative pathogen in patients with community-acquired pneumonia admitted to the intensive care unit. Bacteremic pneumococcal pneumonia is an advanced stage of severe pneumococcal pneumonia. Improvement in the management of bacteremic pneumococcal pneumonia has the potential for improving the survival for severe pneumococcal pneumonia.

RECENT FINDINGS

Non-culture methods, especially the Binax urinary antigen test, can increase the diagnostic yield for pneumococcal pneumonia, allowing targeted antimicrobial therapy (specifically penicillin). In-vitro resistance to penicillin has increased over the past decade; however, it has not led to clinical failure when used for pneumococcal pneumonia.

SUMMARY

Hospitalized patients with community-acquired pneumonia should have blood cultures obtained to confirm the possibility of bacteremic pneumococcal pneumonia. Based on pharmacodynamic properties, parenteral penicillin remains the drug of choice to treat pneumococcal pneumonia regardless of in-vitro resistance. Combination antimicrobial therapy will likely improve survival of patients with bacteremic pneumococcal pneumonia among the subset of critically ill patients.

Use of pharmacodynamic principles to optimise dosage regimens for antibacterial agents in the elderly

Throughout most of the world we are witnessing an ever increasing number of aged people as a percentage of the general population. In the coming years, the unique spectrum of infections presented by an elderly population, particularly those in long-term care facilities, will challenge our ability to maintain an effective battery of antibacterials. The pharmacokinetic parameters of most antibacterial agents are altered when assessed in the elderly due in part to non-pathological physiological changes. The inability to clear a drug from the body due to declining lung, kidney/bladder, gastrointestinal and circulatory efficiency can cause accumulation in the body of drugs given in standard dosages. While this may have the potential benefit of achieving therapeutic concentrations at a lower dose, there is also a heightened risk of attaining toxic drug concentrations and an increased chance of unfavourable interactions with other medications. Pharmacodynamic issues in the elderly are related to problems that arise from treating elderly patients who may have a history of previous antibacterial treatment and exposure to resistant organisms from multiple hospitalisations. Furthermore, the elderly often acquire infections in tandem with other common disease states such as diabetes mellitus and heart disease. Thus, it is essential that optimised dosage strategies be designed specifically for this population using pharmacodynamic principles that take into account the unique circumstances of the elderly. Rational and effective dosage and administration strategies based on pharmacodynamic breakpoints and detailed understanding of the pharmacokinetics of antibacterials in the elderly increase the chances of achieving complete eradication of an infection in a timely manner. In addition, this strategy helps prevent selection of drug-resistant bacteria and minimises the toxic effects of antibacterial therapy in the elderly patient.

Antibiothérapie des pneumonies aiguës communautaires à Streptococcus pneumoniae : impact clinique de la résistance bactérienne

The emergence of Streptococcus pneumoniae strains with reduced susceptibility to beta-lactams and with multiple drug resistance has not led to major changes in recommendations for antibiotic therapy in patients with acute community-acquired pneumococcal pneumonia. Numerous factors explain the limited clinical impact of this major microbiological change. The frequency of intermediate strains is high but the frequency of resistant strains to beta-lactams is very low. There is a complex relation between the acquisition of resistance to beta-lactams and the decreased virulence of S. pneumoniae strains. The only finding in studies of humanized experimental animal models of lethal bacteremic pneumonia caused by resistance and tolerant strains was a slowing in the kinetics of beta-lactams bactericidal activity, especially for amoxicillin. Taken together, this preclinical data shows that microbiological resistance of pneumococci to beta-lactams has very little influence on a possible failure of recommanded treatment regimens for pneumococcal pneumonia. The high rate of multiple drug resistance, particularly among beta-lactam resistant strains, rules out the probabilistic use of macrolides. Conversely, fluoroquinolone (FQ) resistance remains low, inferior to 3%, and the same is true for ketolides (<1%). Only a global strategy of patient management in the use of these new drugs could ensure their long-term activity. The high mortality rate of hospitalized S. pneumoniae pneumonia will only be improved with a better understanding of the complex host-bacteria interactions.

Therapeutic options for pneumococcal pneumonia in Turkey

BACKGROUND

Community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Streptococcus pneumoniae continues to be the most important causative agent in CAP.

OBJECTIVE

This article reviews options for the empiric treatment of pneumococcal pneumonia in Turkey based on local epidemiologic data.

METHODS

This was a retrospective review of studies evaluating antimicrobial susceptibility patterns among clinical isolates of S pneumoniae in Turkey from 2000 onward. Relevant studies were identified through literature searches of both Turkish (Ulakbim and Pleksus) and international (MEDLINE) databases using the search terms S pneumoniae and Turkey. Only antibiotics likely to be used in pneumococcal pneumonia were evaluated. The minimum concentration required to inhibit 90% of isolates (MIC(90)) for each antibiotic was obtained by averaging all reported values to arrive at a single value for the entire country.

RESULTS

The MIC(90) for penicillin was 1 g/mL; among all isolates of S pneumoniae, 6.4% were penicillin resistant and 30.9% showed intermediate susceptibility. The MIC(90)s and overall rates of resistance (combined intermediate susceptibility and resistance) for the other antibiotics studied were as follows: cefaclor, 4 microg/mL (26.3%); cefuroxime, 2 microg/mL (15.4%); ceftriaxone, 0.25 microg/mL (0.75%); imipenem, 0.06 microg/mL (0%); erythromycin, 2 microg/mL (13.9%); clarithromycin, 2 microg/mL (13.7%); azithromycin, 2 microg/mL (13.8%); telithromycin, 0.06 microg/mL (no published breakpoints); trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, 4 microg/mL (63.8%); tetracycline, 16 microg/mL (24.6%); ciprofloxacin, 2 microg/mL (no published breakpoints); ofloxacin, 2 microg/mL (4%); levofloxacin, 1 microg/mL (0%); gemifloxacin, 0.06 microg/mL (no published breakpoints); and moxifloxacin, 0.06 microg/mL (0%). Penicillin G, at standard parenteral doses, has been shown to achieve concentrations above the MIC for >40% to 100% of the dosing interval, depending on the MIC of the isolate. Based on pharmacodynamic studies, the MIC(90) for penicillin in Turkey should easily be exceeded with the use of penicillin G 3 mU QID. In vitro, susceptibility is generally greater to amoxicillin than to penicillin, with average amoxicillin MIC values approximately 1 dilution lower than those for penicillin. Amoxicillin's better pharmacodynamic/pharmacokinetic properties relative to penicillin make it a reasonable option for the treatment of CAP. In pharmacodynamic studies, amoxicillin 1 g TID achieved and maintained serum concentrations of 2 to 4 microg/mL for at least 40% of the dosing interval. A new formulation of amoxicillin/clavulanate given 2000/125 mg BID is expected to eradicate isolates of S pneumoniae at an amoxicillin MIC < or = 4 microg/mL.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on data from Turkish surveillance studies performed from 2000 onward, high-dose parenteral penicillin G and parenteral/oral amoxicillin may be initial choices for the empiric treatment of uncomplicated pneumococcal pneumonia in Turkey. If these agents cannot be used for any reason, other options include parenteral cefuroxime, ceftriaxone, cefotaxime, newer quinolones, macrolides, and telithromycin. Due to elevated rates of resistance in Turkey, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole and tetracyclines are not recommended for empiric use in these infections.

Drug treatment of pneumococcal pneumonia in the elderly

Streptococcus pneumoniae has been recognised as a major cause of pneumonia since the time of Sir William Osler. Drug-resistant S. pneumoniae (DRSP), which have gradually become resistant to penicillins as well as more recently developed macrolides and fluoroquinolones, have emerged as a consequence of indiscriminate use of antibacterials coupled with the ability of the pneumococcus to adapt to a changing antibacterial milieu. Pneumococci use cell wall choline components to bind platelet-activating factor receptors, colonise mucosal surfaces and evade innate immune defenses. Numerous virulence factors that include hyaluronidase, neuraminidase, iron-binding proteins, pneumolysin and autolysin then facilitate cytolysis of host cells and allow tissue invasion and bloodstream dissemination. Changes in pneumococcal cell wall penicillin-binding proteins account for resistance to penicillins, mutations in the ermB gene cause high-level macrolide resistance and mutations in topoisomerase IV genes coupled with GyrA gene mutations alter DNA gyrase and lead to high-level fluoroquinolone resistance. Risk factors for lower respiratory tract infections in the elderly include age-associated changes in oral clearance, mucociliary clearance and immune function. Other risks for developing pneumonia include poor nutrition, hypoalbuminaemia, bedridden status, aspiration, recent viral infection, the presence of chronic organ dysfunction syndromes including parenchymal lung disease and recent antibacterial therapy. Although the incidence of infections caused by DRSP is rising, the effect of an increase in the prevalence of resistant pneumococci on mortality is not clear. When respiratory infections occur, rapid diagnosis and prompt, empirical administration of appropriate antibacterial therapy that ensures adequate coverage of DRSP is likely to increase the probability of a successful outcome when treating community-acquired pneumonia in elderly patients, particularly those with multiple risk factors for DRSP. A chest x-ray is recommended for all patients, but other testing such as obtaining a sputum Gram's smear is not necessary and should not prolong the time gap between clinical suspicion of pneumonia and antibacterial administration. The selection of antibacterials should be based upon local resistance patterns of suspected organisms and the bactericidal efficacy of the chosen drugs. If time-dependent agents are chosen and DRSP are possible pathogens, dosing should keep drug concentrations above the minimal inhibitory concentration that is effective for DRSP. Treatment guidelines and recent studies suggest that combination therapy with a beta-lactam and macrolide may be associated with a better outcome in hospitalised patients, and overuse of fluoroquinolones as a single agent may promote quinolone resistance. The ketolides represent a new class of macrolide-like antibacterials that are highly effective in vitro against macrolide- and azalide-resistant pneumococci. Pneumococcal vaccination with the currently available polysaccharide vaccine is thought to confer some preventive benefit (preventing invasive pneumococcal disease), but more effective vaccines, such as nonconjugate protein vaccines, need to be developed that provide broad protection against pneumococcal infection.

Mechanisms of resistance among respiratory tract pathogens

Antimicrobial resistance among respiratory tract pathogens represents a significant health care threat. Identifying the antimicrobial agents that remain effective in the presence of resistance, and knowing why, requires a thorough understanding of the mechanisms of action of the various agents as well as the mechanisms of resistance demonstrated among respiratory tract pathogens. The primary goal of antimicrobial therapy is to eradicate the pathogen, via killing or inhibiting bacteria, from the site of infection; the defenses of the body are required for killing any remaining bacteria. Targeting a cellular process or function specific to bacteria and not to the host limits the toxicity to patients. Currently, there are four general cellular targets to which antimicrobials are targeted: cell wall formation and maintenance, protein synthesis, DNA replication, and folic acid metabolism. Resistance mechanisms among respiratory tract pathogens have been demonstrated for all four targets. In general, the mechanisms of resistance used by these pathogens fall into one of three categories: enzymatic inactivation of the antimicrobial, prevention of intracellular accumulation, and modification of the target site to which agents bind to exert an antimicrobial effect. Resistance to some agents can be overcome by modifying the dosage regimens (e.g., using high-dose therapy) or inhibiting the resistance mechanism (e.g., b-lactamase inhibitors), whereas other mechanisms of resistance can only be overcome by using an agent from a different class. Understanding the mechanisms of action of the various agents and the mechanisms of resistance used by respiratory tract pathogens can help clinicians identify the agents that will increase the likelihood of achieving optimal outcomes.

Ampicillin and penicillin concentration in serum and pleural fluid of hospitalized children with community-acquired pneumonia

BACKGROUND

Optimal therapeutic efficacy of beta-lactam antibiotics for treatment of pneumococcal pneumonia is thought to be associated with the serum concentration greater than the minimum inhibitory concentration for 40-50% of the interdose interval at site of infection.

OBJECTIVE

Establish whether intravenous administration of ampicillin 400 mg/kg/day or penicillin 200,000 IU/kg/day in 6 divided doses reaches serum and or pleural concentrations above 4 microg/ml for at least 40% of the interdose interval.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Hospitalized healthy children 1 month-14 years old with community-acquired bacterial pneumonia and empyema were eligible. Blood samples were obtained 30 min (C1) and 3 h (C2) after an antibiotic dose. Pleural fluid samples were obtained 1 and 4 h after the same dose in which blood samples were obtained. The concentrations were measured by high performance liquid chromatography.

RESULTS

The study included 17 patients treated with ampicillin and 13 treated with penicillin. For ampicillin, mean serum concentrations were C1 37.3 +/- 19 microg/ml and C2 11 +/- 10.2 microg/ml and mean pleural fluid concentrations were C1 25.8 +/- 9.9 microg/ml and C2 16.2 +/- 7.9 microg/ml. For penicillin, mean serum concentrations were C1 21.8 +/- 16.4 microg/ml and C2 23.9 +/- 3.4 microg/ml. Mean pleural fluid concentrations were C1 10.9 +/- 2.2 microg/ml and C2 7.7 +/- 3.4 microg/ml. In 8 of 30 patients, serum C2 was <4 microg/ml; in all of them serum concentrations were >4 microg/ml for >40% of the interdose interval.

CONCLUSIONS

This study of the pharmacokinetics of beta-lactam antibiotics in children with bacterial pneumonia may help in the development of therapeutic guidelines for the treatment of pneumococcal pneumonia.

Clinical relevance of antimicrobial resistance in the management of pneumococcal community-acquired pneumonia

Streptococcus pneumoniae remains the most common bacterial cause of community-acquired pneumonia, and these infections are associated with significant morbidity and mortality worldwide. A major concern is the increasing incidence of antibiotic resistance among pneumococcal isolates, which, in the case of certain of the antibiotic classes, has been associated with treatment failure. Yet despite multiple reports of infections with penicillin-resistant pneumococcal isolates, no cases of bacteriologic failure have been documented with the use of penicillin or ampicillin in the treatment of pneumonia caused by penicillin-resistant pneumococci. Current prevalence and levels of penicillin resistance among pneumococal isolates in most areas of the world do not indicate a need for substantial treatment changes with regard to the use of the penicillins. For infections with penicillin-sensitive strains, penicillin or an aminopenicillin in a standard dosage will still be effective for treatment. In the cases of strains with intermediate resistance, beta-lactam agents are still considered appropriate treatment, although higher dosages are recommended. Infections with isolates of high-level penicillin resistance should be treated with alternative agents such as the third-generation cephalosporins or the new antipneumococcal fluoroquinolones. In the case of the cephalosporins, pharmacodynamic/pharmacokinetic parameters help predict which of those agents are likely to be successful, and the less active agents should not be used. Debate continues in the literature with regard to the impact of macrolide resistance on the outcome of pneumococcal pneumonia, with some investigators providing evidence of an "in vivo-in vitro paradox," referring to discordance between reported in vitro resistance and clinical success of macrolides/azalide in vivo. However, several cases of macrolide/azalide treatment failure have been documented, and many clinicians recommend that these agents not be used on their own in areas with a high prevalence and levels of macrolide/azalide resistance. However, evidence is emerging to show beneficial effects on outcome with combination therapy, especially that of a beta-lactam agent and a macrolide given together to sicker, hospitalized patients with pneumococcal pneumonia. In an attempt to prevent the emergence of resistance, it has been recommended by some that the new fluoroquinolones not be used routinely as first-line agents in the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia; instead, they say, these agents should be reserved for patients who are allergic to the commonly used beta-lactam agents, for infections known to be or suspected of being caused by highly resistant strains, and for patients in whom initial therapy has failed.

Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic Considerations in Community-Acquired Lower Respiratory Tract Infections

To accomplish the goal of both clinical and microbiological cure in the treatment of lower respiratory tract infections, microbiological data along with pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic data should be used. Recent studies have determined 2important antibacterial pharmacokinetic/ pharmacodynamic parameters that differ among classes of antimicrobial agents. The 2major groups include the antibiotics that exhibit concentration-dependent killing with a postantibiotic effect and time-dependent killing with minimal to moderate postantibiotic effects. For drugs that are concentration dependent (aminoglycosides, fluoroquinolones), the area under the concentration-time curve (AUC/MIC) is the most important predictor of bacteriological eradication. Alternatively, for antibiotics that exhibit time-dependent killing (-lactams, macrolides), time above the MIC ( T >MIC) is probably the major parameter that determines efficacy. Using these parameters provides the tools needed for appropriate antibiotic dosing.

Why do we need to eradicate pathogens in respiratory tract infections?

Evidence from studies in otitis media, acute bacterial sinusitis and acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis indicate that clinical efficacy is dependent on bacterial eradication. Failure to eradicate bacterial pathogens increases the potential for clinical failure, incurring further costs, and may also select and maintain bacteria that are resistant to a wide range of antimicrobials. Bacteriologically confirmed clinical failures have been reported in pneumococcal pneumonia with both macrolides and older fluoroquinolones (ciprofloxacin, ofloxacin, and levofloxacin). These failures were due to the involvement of resistant pathogens (macrolides) or suboptimal pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics (PK/PD) (quinolones). However, persistent positive blood cultures have not been reported during therapy with adequate doses of benzylpenicillins or aminopenicillins. Treatment failure, driven by the failure to eradicate pathogens, leads to both economic and environmental costs, hospitalization being the major cost driver. Failure to achieve bacterial eradication may also lead to the development and spread of resistance. Different types of antimicrobials appear to be driving resistance to different extents, and this may be due to suboptimal PK/PD. In conclusion, factors to consider when prescribing include an accurate diagnosis, knowledge of local epidemiology, the role of PK/PD principles in antimicrobial choice, clinical outcomes in relation to bacteriologic efficacy, and resistance and its bacteriologic and clinical impact. The vicious cycle of infection, inappropriate therapy, bacteriologic failure, selection/spread of resistance and further infection needs to be broken by the use of appropriate treatments to achieve bacterial eradication.

Bacteremic pneumococcal infections in immunocompromised patients without AIDS: the impact of beta-lactam resistance on mortality

BACKGROUND

Streptococcus pneumoniae is the leading cause of community-acquired pneumonia in the elderly, and in recent years it has arisen as an important pathogen in HIV-infected patients. However, there is a scarcity of information on clinical and therapeutic problems associated with pneumococcal infections in other immuno-compromised patients. The objective of this study was to assess the most relevant epidemiologic aspects, clinical features and prognostic factors of pneumococcal bacteremia in immunocompromised hosts without AIDS.

METHODS

This was a retrospective analysis of patients with pneumococcemia, carried out in a 600-bed, university-affiliated hospital in Madrid, Spain. Two-hundred and sixty patients were evaluated retrospectively; 69 (26.5%) immunocompromised patients based on strict case definitions were compared with a group composed of 191 non-immunocompromised hosts with a variety of chronic conditions. Conventional management of pneumococcal bacteremia according to clinical standards was assessed. The MICs of penicillin and other beta-lactam antibiotics, and related mortality and hospital mortality at 30 days, were measured.

RESULTS

A comparison of clinical manifestations of pneumococcemia between immunocompromised patients and non-immunocompromised patients did not show differences in the presence of fever, obtundation, type of lung involvement, frequency of primary bacteremia, or meningitis. Hospital-acquired pneumococcemia was significantly more frequent in immunocompromised patients (34.7% versus 6.8%, P<0.0001), and resistance to penicillin was also more common in pneumococcal strains isolated from these patients (37.5% versus 20%, P=0.0009). Septic shock occurred more frequently in immunocompromised patients, although the overall and related mortality were not significantly different from those found in non-immunocompromised patients (33.3% versus 22.5%, P=0.07, and 28.9% versus 20.9%, P=0.7 respectively). In the multivariate analysis, multilobar pneumonia (odds ratio (OR) 15.7; 95% CI 6.00-41.30; P<0.001), inadequate treatment (OR 12.20; 95% CI 4.10-37.20; P<0.001), obtundation (OR 5.80; 95% CI 2.20-15.00; P<0.001) and hospital-acquired bacteremia (OR 4.80; 95% CI 1.00-14.60; P<0.006) were associated with an increased risk of mortality in patients with pneumococcemia. Only multilobar pneumonia (OR 7.90; 95% CI 4.10-15.35; P<0.001) was significantly associated with an increased risk of mortality in immunocompromised patients. Patients with acute leukemia and lymphoma had a greater mortality rate than non-immunocompromised patients (53.8% related mortality, P=0.05). Analysis of these patients showed frequent inadequate empirical therapy with ceftazidime plus amikacin in the presence of beta-lactam resistance.

CONCLUSIONS

Much of the burden of pneumococcal bacteremia was attributable to immunosuppressive diseases. In immunocompromised patients, pneumococcemia was frequently acquired within the hospital during the treatment of the underlying condition, and resistance to penicillin was common. Patients with acute leukemia and lymphoma who develop fever and pneumonia should be treated with drugs active against beta-lactam-resistant pneumococci, irrespective of the setting in which the infection develops.

Appropriate use of antimicrobials for drug-resistant pneumonia: focus on the significance of beta-lactam-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae

The beta-lactam antibiotics (penicillins and cephalosporins) are commonly prescribed for the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia. However, Streptococcus pneumoniae, the most common etiologic agent of community-acquired pneumonia, has become increasingly resistant to beta-lactams over the past decade. The results of several studies suggest that penicillins remain effective for streptococcal pneumonia when the infecting pathogen has a minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) </=2 microgram/mL, presumably because the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic parameters associated with current dosing regimens are still sufficient. However, when the MIC >/=4 microgram/mL, increased rates of mortality (for patients who survive their first 4 days of hospitalization) may occur. Currently, 3.5%-7.8% of S. pneumoniae clinical isolates have MICs that fall in this latter class, but these rates may rise in the future. The clinical relevance of in vitro resistance may be related to at least 3 factors: concordance of antimicrobial therapy, severity of illness, and virulence.

Streptococcus pneumoniae in community-acquired pneumonia. How important is drug resistance?

Patients hospitalized with community-acquired pneumonia caused by S. pneumoniae strains with intermediate susceptibility to penicillin according to the conventional definition respond well to treatment with adequate doses of beta-lactam antibiotics. All studies currently available comparing mortality between patients with pneumonia caused by nonsusceptible and susceptible pneumococci agree that resistance of MIC 2 mg/L is not associated independently with an increased mortality. Most but not all studies could not prove an effect of microbial resistance on morbidity. There are data suggesting, however, that pneumococcal pneumonia caused by highly resistant strains (MIC > or = 4 mg/L) does affect the outcome. Pneumococcal resistance remains a matter of concern. Most reports show an increase not only of resistance rates, but also of the proportion of highly resistant strains. The selection of initial empirical antimicrobial treatment of patients with community-acquired pneumonia should be performed judiciously. Because the serum and pulmonary levels achieved with penicillin or related drugs are several times higher than the MICs of most strains, pneumonias caused by S. pneumoniae currently defined as not susceptible to penicillin should respond well to treatment with a beta-lactam antibiotic, used in optimal doses. Consequently, there is no reason fundamentally to change the current approach to initial empiric antimicrobial treatment of patients with community-acquired pneumonia. Nevertheless, increases in resistance to macrolides may prompt a limited use of these drugs in the outpatient setting. In any case, treatment failures may occur at higher levels of resistance, and a change in the definition of susceptibility categories toward higher cutoffs for S. pneumoniae seems to be reasonable.

Pharmacodynamics of antiinfective therapy: taking what we know to the patient's bedside

Applied pharmacokinetics has long been a lifeline of clinical pharmacy services. National surveys during the past decade documented clinical pharmacy services and demonstrated that a substantial rate of growth occurred in clinical pharmacokinetic consultations and management of drug therapy protocols. Pharmacodynamic principles of antiinfective agents are rapidly becoming a new paradigm of clinical pharmacy services. beta-Lactams, aminoglycosides, and fluoroquinolones represent the three classes of antiinfective agents that have made the most progress toward the clinical applications of pharmacodynamics. Pharmacodynamic parameters are being used to select and compare agents within an antiinfective class (e.g., fluoroquinolones), make modifications in the dosage (e.g., extended-interval dosing of aminoglycosides) and/or mode of administration (e.g., continuous infusion of beta-lactams), develop in vivo breakpoint determinations, and assess the development of bacterial resistance. In addition, pharmacodynamic parameters have influenced the clinical drug development of new (e.g., linezolid) and older (amoxicillin-clavulanate, fluoroquinolones) antiinfective agents. Further investigations are needed to explore the clinician's use of validated prediction methods and patient-specific pharmacodynamic parameters at the bedside. By linking pharmacokinetic services with pharmacodynamic principles, the opportunity for continued progress toward our assessment and decisions for successful clinical outcomes is possible with old and new antiinfective agents.

Comparative study of treatment with penicillin, ceftriaxone, trovafloxacin, quinupristin-dalfopristin and vancomycin in experimental endocarditis due to penicillin- and ceftriaxone-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae

The efficacy of different antibiotics was compared in an experimental model of aortic valve endocarditis in rabbits, using a serotype 19 strain of Streptococcus pneumoniae resistant to penicillin (MIC 12 mg/L) and ceftriaxone (MIC 12 mg/L). The results were compared with those of a control group, which received no treatment. One hundred and nineteen animals were treated with one of the following antibiotic regimens: im procaine penicillin G at a dosage of 300,000 U/kg weight/12 h (16 animals); iv trovafloxacin, 13.3 mg/kg/12 h (31 animals); iv ceftriaxone, 75 mg/kg/24 h (21 animals); iv vancomycin, 20 mg/kg/12 h (15 animals) and im quinupristin-dalfopristin, 30 mg/kg/8 h (20 animals). All the antibiotics used in this study proved to be efficient in reducing numbers of S. pneumoniae and in increasing the percentage of aortic vegetations that were rendered sterile compared with the control group. Penicillin at the dosage used in our study was capable of achieving serum concentrations two or three times greater than the MIC, thus demonstrating its effectiveness as an antibiotic for this endocarditis model. No significant difference was observed between the effects of vancomycin, quinupristin-dalfopristin and penicillin. Vancomycin proved to be more efficient than trovofloxacin in reducing the bacterial load and increasing the numbers sterilized. There was also a tendency for this antibiotic to be more effective than ceftriaxone in reducing the bacterial load of the vegetations. There was a statistically significant correlation between the weight of the vegetations and their bacterial load. In the light of these results, vancomycin and quinupristin-dalfopristin may be considered suitable alternatives to penicillin for the treatment of penicillin-resistant S. pneumoniae endocarditis.

Ambulatory use of parenteral antibacterials: contemporary perspectives

Outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT) offers increased patient comfort and convenience in appropriately selected patients who require parenteral antibacterial therapy, as well as opportunity for cost savings. Home-based programmes, with drugs being administered by the patient or the caregiver, have become the norm in the USA. Choice of drugs for OPAT is based on antimicrobial spectrum, dosage regimen, drug stability, toxicity profile, and cost. Over the past decade, availability of sophisticated programmable pumps has allowed a wider range of antimicrobial agents to be used in the ambulatory setting. The most popular antibacterial agents in OPAT programmes in the USA are vancomycin and beta-lactams.

The drug-resistant pneumococcus: clinical relevance, therapy, and prevention

Streptococcus pneumoniae has been known for > 100 years as the most important bacterial pathogen of the respiratory tract in adults and children. In recent years, the pneumococcus has begun to exhibit increasing resistance to antimicrobial agents. Because of the huge number of infections caused by this organism, the development of resistance has changed the approach to many infectious disease problems, particularly with regard to empiric antibiotic therapy and prophylaxis. In our review of the antibiotic-resistant pneumococcus, we review the microbiologic basis for resistance, risk factors for and clinical relevance of infection by a resistant organism, and infection control measures.

Guidelines in pulmonary medicine: a 25-year profile

OBJECTIVE

We attempted to identify clinical practice guideline and pathway articles in the area of pulmonary medicine published in peer-reviewed journals since 1974.

DESIGN

Review.

DATA SOURCES

MEDLINE, the Cochrane Database, Best Evidence, and Abstracts of Clinical Care Guidelines from January 1974 to December 1998.

STUDY SELECTION

All articles contained relevant search terms for pulmonary topics and were included irrespective of setting (primary or specialty, inpatient or outpatient). Controlled and uncontrolled trials as well as observational studies and consensus opinion/statements were all identified. The articles were stratified by design as well as by pulmonary topic.

DATA EXTRACTION

Limited data on study type, study focus, year of publication, and results of study were abstracted.

RESULTS

Our criteria yielded 271 articles, including 115 consensus statements and expert opinion guidelines; 30 controlled studies, meta-analyses, or systematic reviews; and 126 uncontrolled trials and observational studies. Of these, 82 articles (30.3%) related to asthma, 46 articles (17.0%) related to COPD, and 36 articles (13.3%) related to pneumonia. In addition, we tracked the increasing publication of all guideline-related pulmonary articles; randomized, controlled trials (RCTs); systematic reviews; and consensus statements by year for the past 25 years.

CONCLUSION

Pulmonary guidelines are increasingly published in peer-reviewed journals, but few are tested clinically in RCTs. There is continued reliance on consensus statements and expert opinion. Pulmonary guideline publications have continued to dramatically increase in number and in importance since 1974, both on the local level and internationally.

Treatment of pneumococcal pneumonia: the case for penicillin G

Although widely endorsed for specific treatment of pneumococcal pneumonia, penicillin G is seldom used for this purpose in clinical practice for at least three reasons: (1) concern about penicillin-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae (PRSP) strains; (2) the difficulty of making an early etiologic diagnosis of pneumonia; and (3) lack of a clear consensus about the optimum dosage. Continuous infusion of 20-24 million units of penicillin per day provides serum levels of 16-20 microg/mL in persons with normal renal function. These levels easily exceed the minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of penicillin G against most PRSP strains (4 microg/mL), which are actually strains with reduced susceptibility to penicillin. High-dose penicillin G therapy has not been shown to be therapeutically ineffective against pneumonia due to PRSP strains. However, the extent of penicillin resistance warrants continued monitoring, because strains exhibiting extremely high-level resistance (MIC > or = 8 microg/mL) would probably respond poorly if at all. Development and use of rapid, sensitive, specific ways to diagnose pneumococcal pneumonia could extend the usefulness of penicillin G, thus postponing the emergence of resistance to other antibiotics.

Resistance issues and treatment implications: pneumococcus, Staphylococcus aureus, and gram-negative rods

During the last decade there has been an unexpectedly rapid evolution of antimicrobial resistance in the respiratory pathogens for community- and hospital-acquired pneumonia. In order to choose the most optimal therapy for their patients, it is essential that physicians be aware of the prevalence and mechanisms of resistance and their implications on the effectiveness of the various antimicrobials.