Follow-up in lung cancer: how often and for what purpose?

The significance of regular chest computed tomography in postoperative surveillance for surgically resected non-small cell lung cancer based on TNM 8th staging system

OBJECTIVES

Although several societies recommend regular chest computed tomography (CT) scans for the surveillance of surgically resected non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), there is paucity of evidence to support these statements. This study aimed to clarify whether regular CT scans improved the prognosis of patients with surgically resected NSCLC based on TNM 8th classification.

METHODS

Patients with pathologic Stage 0-III NSCLC who underwent complete surgical resection other than sublobar resection procedures were enrolled in the study. For these patients, clinicopathological data and postoperative surveillance data were collected by the retrospective review of medical records. Patients were categorized into the chest X-ray (CXR) group or the CT group according to whether they were followed-up with basic examinations including CXR or basic examinations plus regular chest CT. Postoperative overall survival was compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

Six hundred sixty five patients were categorized into the CXR (n = 245) and CT (n = 420) groups. The clinicopathological backgrounds did not differ to a statistically significant extent. Recurrence was seen in 68 (27.3%) patients in the CXR group and 117 (27.8%) patients in the CT group. The 5-year overall survival rates of the two groups did not differ to a statistically significant extent (CXR, 76.5%; CT, 78.3%, P = 0.22).

CONCLUSION

Regular chest CT scans may not improve the prognosis of surgically resected NSCLC. Further study is warranted to precisely evaluate the benefit of CT-based postoperative surveillance of NSCLC.

Postoperative surveillance using low-dose computed tomography for non-small-cell lung cancer

OBJECTIVES

We retrospectively analysed the surgical prognosis of patients with pathological stage I non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who after complete resection underwent low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) or conventional CT as postoperative surveillance.

METHODS

We investigated 416 patients who underwent lobectomy or segmentectomy between January 2013 and December 2016. We compared the prognosis between the LDCT and conventional CT groups using the propensity score-matched analysis.

RESULTS

The median follow-up period was 57 months. Cancer recurrence occurred in 47 patients (11.3%). In the entire cohort (n = 416), recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) were better in the LDCT group (P = 0.001 and 0.002, respectively). Both intrathoracic recurrence and distant metastasis were higher in the conventional group (P = 0.015 and 0.009, respectively). However, there was no statistical difference in the factors leading to recurrence detection (routine radiological examination, symptoms and elevated tumour markers: all P > 0.05). Both groups were matched using a ratio of 1:1. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.788. A total of 226 patients were successfully matched. After matching, there was no statistical difference between the 2 groups for RFS and OS (P = 0.263 and 0.226). There were also no statistical differences in recurrence rate, the factors leading to recurrence detection or recurrence site (all P > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

After using propensity score matched, RFS and OS did not differ significantly between LDCT and conventional CT groups. Retrospective comparisons suggest no disadvantages of using LDCT for postoperative surveillance of pathological stage I NSCLC. Further validation will be needed in the future.

Barriers to surveillance imaging adherence in early-staged lung cancer

Background

Frequency of post-treatment surveillance is highly variable following curative resection of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We sought to characterize surveillance practices after lobectomy for early-stage NSCLC and to identify the impact of various demographic factors on patterns of surveillance.

Methods

We included patients who underwent anatomic lobectomy for pathologic stage I NSCLC from 2007-2017. Demographic characteristics, post-operative imaging studies (internal and external), and travel distance were recorded. We defined the minimal standard of surveillance imaging studies (MSSIS) as ≥7 studies in the first 5 years (computed tomography/positron emission tomography). Patient sex, ethnicity, marital status, and distance traveled were evaluated as predictors of imaging receipt. Standard descriptive statistics, univariate, and multivariate analysis (MVR) were performed.

Results

A total of 1,288 patients were included. The mean age was 65.5±10.1 years, 589 (45.7%) were male, 1,081 (83.9%) were Caucasian, and 924 (71.7%) were married. Only 464 (36%) achieved MSSIS; being married [75.6% (351/464) vs. 68.8% (567/824), P=0.01] and having larger tumor size (2.63±0.04 vs. 2.49±0.05 cm, P=0.03) were both associated with MSSIS. Patients residing <100 miles from the hospital were more likely to have MSSIS, and more imaging at 24 months (4.1±2.2 vs. 3.7±2.0; P=0.006), 60 months (8.0±5.1 vs. 6.6±4.2, P=0.001) and overall (10±7.3 vs. 8.2±6.3; P=0.001). On MVR, tumor size and marital status were associated with MSSIS.

Conclusions

Two-thirds of patients at our institution did not undergo recommended surveillance imaging. Tumor size, being married, and living <100 miles from the medical center were associated with an increased number of imaging studies and greater adherence to guidelines.

Routine follow-up after surgical treatment of lung cancer: is chest CT useful?

Objective:

To report the experience of a routine follow-up program based on medical visits and chest CT.

Methods:

This was a retrospective study involving patients followed after complete surgical resection of non-small cell lung cancer between April of 2007 and December of 2015. The follow-up program consisted of clinical examination and chest CT. Each follow-up visit was classified as a routine or non-routine consultation, and patients were considered symptomatic or asymptomatic. The outcomes of the follow-up program were no evidence of cancer, recurrence, or second primary lung cancer.

Results:

The sample comprised 148 patients. The median time of follow-up was 40.1 months, and 74.3% of the patients underwent fewer chest CTs than those recommended in our follow-up program. Recurrence and second primary lung cancer were found in 17.6% and 11.5% of the patients, respectively. Recurrence was diagnosed in a routine medical consultation in 69.2% of the cases, 57.7% of the patients being asymptomatic. Second primary lung cancer was diagnosed in a routine medical appointment in 94.1% of the cases, 88.2% of the patients being asymptomatic. Of the 53 patients who presented with abnormalities on chest CT, 41 (77.3%) were diagnosed with cancer.

Conclusion:

Most of the cases of recurrence, especially those of second primary lung cancer, were confirmed by chest CT in asymptomatic patients, indicating the importance of a strict follow-up program that includes chest CTs after surgical resection of lung cancer.

Guiding Principles in the Management of Synchronous and Metachronous Primary Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Multiple lung cancers can be found simultaneously, with incidence ranging from 1% to 8%. Documentation of more than 1 pulmonary lesion can be challenging, because these solid, ground-glass, or mixed-density tumors may represent multicentric malignant disease or intrapulmonary metastases. If mediastinal nodal and distant deposits are excluded, surgery should be contemplated. After surgical treatment of lung cancer, patients should be followed closely for an undetermined period of time. Good clinical judgment is of outmost importance in deciding which individuals will benefit from those surgical interventions and which are candidates for alternate therapies. Every case should be discussed in a multidisciplinary meeting.

Computed tomography follow-up identifies radically treatable new primaries after resection for lung cancer

OBJECTIVES

The optimal imaging programme for the follow-up of patients who have undergone resection of primary lung cancer is yet to be determined. We investigated the incidence and patterns of new and recurrent malignancy after resection for early-stage lung cancer in patients enrolled into a computed tomography (CT) follow-up programme.

METHODS

We reviewed the outcomes of consecutive patients who underwent CT follow-up after resection of early-stage primary lung cancer at the Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, between 2013 and 2017.

RESULTS

Four hundred and sixty-six consecutive patients underwent resection of primary lung cancer between 1 January 2013 and 31 March 2017. Three hundred and thirty-one patients (71.0%) were enrolled in CT follow-up. The median follow-up was 98 weeks (range 26-262). Sixty patients (18.2%) were diagnosed with programme-detected malignancy. Recurrence was diagnosed in 36 patients (10.9%), new primary lung cancer in 16 patients (4.8%) and non-lung primary tumours in 8 patients (2.4%). A routine CT scan identified the majority of new primary lung cancers (84.2%) and those with disease recurrence (85.7%). The majority of programme-detected malignancies were radically treatable (55%). The median survival of programme-detected cancers was 92.4 versus 23.0 weeks for patients with clinically detected tumours (P < 0.0001). Utilizing the CT scout image as a surrogate for chest X-ray, the sensitivity of this modality was 16.95% (8.44-28.97%) and specificity was 89.83% (79.17-96.18%). Negative likelihood ratio was 0.92 (0.8-1.07).

CONCLUSIONS

CT follow-up of surgically treated primary lung cancer patients identifies malignancy at a stage where radical treatment is possible in the majority of patients. Chest X-ray follow-up may not be of benefit following lung cancer resection.

Cost-Effectiveness of Surveillance Scanning Strategies after Curative Treatment of Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer

BACKGROUND

After curative treatment of primary non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), patients undergo intensive surveillance with the aim to detect recurrences from the primary tumor or metachronous second primary lung cancer as early as possible and improve overall survival. However, the benefit of surveillance is debated. Available evidence is of low quality and conflicting. Microsimulation modeling facilitates the exploration of the impact of different surveillance strategies and provides insight into the cost-effectiveness of surveillance.

METHODS

A microsimulation model was used to simulate a range of computed tomography (CT)-based surveillance schedules, differing in the frequency and duration of CT surveillance. The impact on survival, quality-adjusted life-years, costs, and cost-effectiveness of each schedule was assessed.

RESULTS

Ten of 108 strategies formed the cost-effectiveness frontier; that is, these were the strategies with the optimal cost-health benefit balance. Per person, the discounted QALYs of these strategies varied between 5.72 and 5.81 y, and discounted costs varied between €9892 and €19,259. Below a willingness-to-pay threshold of €50,000/QALY, no scanning is the preferred option. For a willingness-to-pay threshold of €80,000/QALY, surveillance scanning every 2 y starting 1 y after curative treatment becomes the best option, with €11,860 discounted costs and 5.76 discounted QALYs per person. The European Society for Medical Oncology guideline strategy was more expensive and less effective than several other strategies.

CONCLUSION

Model simulations suggest that limited CT surveillance scanning after the treatment of primary NSCLC is cost-effective, but the incremental health-benefit remains marginal. However, model simulations do suggest that the guideline strategy is not cost-effective.

Liquid biopsy for ALK-positive early non-small-cell lung cancer predicts disease relapse

Background: We aimed to determine whether circulating tumor cells (CTCs) and cell-free DNA (cfDNA) aids in prognosis of relapse-free survival (RFS). Methods: Non-small cell lung cancer patients with ALK mutations were recruited prospectively. CTCs and cfDNA were quantified at different time points. RFS was estimated and correlated. Results: Baseline median CTCs and cfDNA were 16 cells and 57 ng/mL and declined to nine cells and 30 ng/mL, respectively, postsurgery in 150 patients. Interestingly, patients without detectable CTCs postsurgery fared better for RFS. cfDNA monitoring showed deviations within 7 months of surgery that were significant predictors for RFS. Conclusion: Short-term monitoring of CTCs and cfDNA variations shows promise for early risk detection and may aid in better disease control.

Surveillance of Lung Cancer and Mesothelioma Patients With Noncurative Treatment Intent: A Narrative Review

BACKGROUND

Lung cancer patients with advanced disease and no active treatment options currently face frequent follow-up visits to outpatient clinics, associated with significant anxiety, time commitment, and costs. Visits also place considerable strain on the health system. Evidence from other cancers and chronic health conditions suggests virtual or remote follow-up can lead to higher patient satisfaction without negatively impacting health outcomes such as survival time.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this review was to identify patient preferences for, and any evidence of relative effectiveness of, different surveillance protocols for patients who have noncurative treatment intent for lung cancer or mesothelioma.

INTERVENTIONS/METHODS

MEDLINE, PubMed, and CINAHL Plus databases were searched for articles published between 1998 and June 2018. The search was restricted to English-language publications and included all original research.

RESULTS

Nine studies met the inclusion criteria, with most studies being retrospective. Findings identified the need for reassurance and hope as part of surveillance, the importance of trust and relationship, and the lack of consistency and evidence around frequency and method of surveillance models.

CONCLUSIONS

Current surveillance is based on expert opinion with little consideration of patient preferences, quality of life, impact on anxiety, and impact on survival outcomes.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

Nurses play a key role in managing surveillance programs for noncurative lung cancer patients. Programs should be built using codesign approaches to ensure best outcomes. Further research needs to be conducted, ensuring directed surveillance models that meet the holistic needs of patients.

Impact of Surveillance After Lobectomy for Lung Cancer on Disease Detection and Survival

INTRODUCTION

Existing guidelines for surveillance after non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treatment are inconsistent and have relatively sparse supporting literature. This study characterizes detection rates of metachronous and recurrent disease during surveillance with computed tomography scans after definitive treatment of early stage NSCLC.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The incidence of metachronous and recurrent disease in patients who previously underwent complete resection via lobectomy for stage IA NSCLC at a single center from 1996 to 2010 were evaluated. A subgroup analysis was used to compare survival of patients whose initial surveillance scan was 6 ± 3 months (early) versus 12 ± 3 months (late) after lobectomy.

RESULTS

Of 294 eligible patients, 49 (17%) developed recurrent disease (14 local only, 35 distant), and 45 (15%) developed new NSCLC. Recurrent disease was found at a mean of 22 ± 19 months, and new primaries were found at a mean of 52 ± 31 months after lobectomy (P < .01). Five-year survival after diagnosis of recurrent disease was significantly lower than after diagnosis of second primaries (2.3% vs. 57.5%; P < .001). In the subgroup analysis of 187 patients, both disease detection on the initial scan (2% [2/94] vs. 4% [4/93]; P = .44) and 5-year survival (early, 80.8% vs. late, 86.7%; P = .61) were not significantly different between the early (n = 94) and the late (n = 93) groups.

CONCLUSION

Surveillance after lobectomy for stage IA NSCLC is useful for identifying both new primary as well as recurrent disease, but waiting to start surveillance until 12 ± 3 months after surgery is unlikely to miss clinically important findings.

Effectiveness of intensive clinical and radiological follow-up in patients with surgically resected NSCLC. Analysis of 2661 patients from the prospective MAGRIT trial

BACKGROUND

Limited evidence is available on effectiveness of clinicoradiological follow-up of early-stage NSCLC patients. MAGRIT was a phase III adjuvant RCT conducted in surgically resected stage IB-IIIA NSCLC patients, in which all participants had a prospectively defined intensive clinicoradiological follow-up.

METHODS

At patient-level data, we analyzed detection modality of disease recurrences and new primary lung cancer (i.e. detected by clinicoradiological scheduled exams versus by interim unscheduled exams), features associated with higher risk of locoregional and/or distant recurrence, and recurrence rates over time.

RESULTS

In the 2261 patients studied, there was a significant association between the type of recurrence and the modality of detection: 88.4% (95% CI, 84%-91%) of the locoregional recurrences and 93.2% (95% CI, 84%-99%) of the new primary lung cancers were detected by scheduled exams, whereas this was only 68.7% (95% CI, 65%-73%) for distant metastases (p < 0.001). Survival of patients with locoregional recurrence or new primary lung cancer detected by scheduled exams was significantly better as compared with those detected by unscheduled exams (HR 0.56, 95% CI 0.36-0.87; p = 0.01). Survival was similarly poor in patients with distant recurrences, both with scheduled and unscheduled detection (3-year survival after recurrence 22.0% and 21.8%, respectively). Recurrence rate was the highest in the first 18 months after surgery-with a peak between month 6 and 12-decreasing thereafter. The hazard of a second primary lung cancer was constant over time.

CONCLUSION

Intensive follow-up is effective in detecting locoregional recurrences and second primary lung cancers, with impact on patients' survival but did not influence the detection of distant recurrences.

Evidence-Based Follow-up for Adults With Cancer

BACKGROUND

The objectives of follow-up care for cancer patients include psycho- social assistance and the detection of health problems. The concept of follow-up care rests on the assumption that the early detection of cancer recurrences and disease- or treatment-related complications is beneficial to patients. In this article, we provide an overview of the scientific evidence supporting current recommen- dations for the follow-up care of patients with colorectal cancer, lung cancer, and lymphoma.

METHODS

This review is based on pertinent publications that were retrieved by a selective search in PubMed, supplemented by the authors' own experience in patient care and guideline creation.

RESULTS

As recurrences usually arise soon after initial treatment, the recommended follow-up interval is shorter in the first two years (3-6 months) and longer thereafter (6-12 months). The question of which particular follow-up studies should be per- formed has only been systematically analyzed in a few cases. For patients with colorectal cancer, colonoscopy is the most important study. Intensive follow-up care is associated with a statistically non-significant increase in the survival rate compared to minimal follow-up care (77.5% versus 75.8%). Intensive diagnostic follow-up studies have been found to lead to a doubling of the frequency of operations for recurrence with curative intent, yet without any effect on the average survival time. The findings in lung cancer are similar. However, after tumor resection with curative intent, regularly repeated CT scanning leads to a survival advantage. In lymphoma patients, the longer the interval from primary treatment, the greater the likelihood of treatment-related secondary illnesses. It is not yet known how follow-up care should be provided to these patients in order to help them best.

CONCLUSION

The evidence supporting the efficacy of currently recommended modalities of follow-up care for cancer patients is weak. Until more data from clinical studies become available, the current guidelines should be followed.

Outcomes of patients with disease recurrence after treatment for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer detected by routine follow-up CT scans versus a symptom driven evaluation

OBJECTIVES

The majority of patients with locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (LANSCLC) will recur after receiving multimodal treatment with curative intent. Current guidelines recommend routine follow-up with computerized tomography (CT) scans, though minimal data exist on the utility of this approach nor has an optimal follow-up strategy to detect recurrence been defined. This study examined whether survival varied if relapse was detected with scheduled follow-up CT versus symptoms, and whether the pattern of recurrence affected these outcomes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Single institution retrospective review of patients who had undergone definitive management of LANSCLC with chemoradiotherapy +/- surgical resection. Standard follow-up testing consisted of routine exam and chest CT beginning at every 3 months in the first year and decreasing to annually after the fifth year.

RESULTS

311 patients were assessed, of which 167 patients recurred and were evaluable. 104 progressions were detected by follow-up and 63 by symptoms. For the entire group, there was no difference in overall survival (OS) for those detected by scans vs. symptoms (7.6 vs. 6.1 months, p = 0.797). After excluding patients with oligometastatic (1-3) brain metastases (OBM), OS was superior in patients with scan detected relapse (7.5 vs. 3.4 months, p = 0.013).

CONCLUSIONS

Routine surveillance by CT chest detects more localized disease than symptom driven follow-up, though OS does not differ. This null result is largely driven by the favorable outcomes for patients with OBM who present symptomatically. A strategy of both chest and brain imaging could be considered and warrants further investigation.

A surveillance method-oriented detection of post-operative spatial-temporal recurrence for non-small cell lung cancer

Background

This study evaluated spatial-temporal recurrence patterns after curative resection for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) to clarify and recommend appropriate post-operative surveillance.

Methods

A total of 2,486 consecutive patients between January 2005 and December 2012 with NSCLC (stage I-IIIA) who underwent definitive surgical resection were retrospectively analyzed. We used a hazard rate curve to evaluate event dynamics. Disease-free survival (DFS) was evaluated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Univariate and multivariate analyses with Cox proportional hazards regression identified risk factors that predicted DFS.

Results

The median follow-up was 50.1 months. Recurrences were diagnosed in 852 (34.3%) patients. Four hundred eighty-nine events first occurred in the chest, 177 in the brain, 117 in the bone, and 71 in the abdomen. Of all recurrences, 78.5% occurred in the first 3 years. Univariate and multivariate analyses identified the age at diagnosis (P<0.001), histology (P=0.023), tumor size (P<0.001), pathologic N stage (P<0.001), and grade (P=0.043) as independent risk factors for intra-thoracic recurrences. Histology (P<0.001), tumor size (P<0.001), surgical method (P=0.021), pathologic N stage (P<0.001), and grade (P=0.005) were independent to predict extra-thoracic recurrences. The hazard rate curve displayed an initial surge of time to any treatment failure during 12 months after surgery. Based on sub-group analysis, both intra- and extra-recurrences increased with stage and brain recurrences in stage IIIA occurred earlier than stage II. Hazard rate curve of brain recurrences in squamous cell carcinoma showed a moderate peak during 9-15 months. Hazard rate curves of brain and bone recurrences in adenocarcinoma displayed clear peaks at 9-27 and 15-30 months, respectively.

Conclusions

Intra- and extra-thoracic recurrences correlate with different clinicopathological factors. Brain MRI and bone ECT were recommended for selected patients in particular time to early detect extra-thoracic recurrences.

Predicting survival following surgical resection of lung cancer using clinical and pathological variables: The development and validation of the LNC-PATH score

INTRODUCTION

The aim of this study was to develop and validate a simple prognostic scoring system using readily available clinical and pathological variables that could stratify patients according to the risk of death following lung cancer resection. We hypothesized that by using additional pathological variables not accounted for by pathological stage alone coupled with markers of overall fitness a new prognostic tool could be developed.

METHODS

Multivariable logistic regression analysis of pathological and other clinical variables from patients undergoing surgical resection of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) were used to determine factors independently associated with 2-year overall survival and so derive the scoring system. The model was then validated in an external multi-centre dataset.

RESULTS

Using multivariable logistic regression on a large dataset (n = 1,421) the 'LNC-PATH' (Lymphovascular invasion, N-stage, adjuvant Chemotherapy, Performance status, Age, T-stage, Histology) prognostic score was devised and then validated using an external dataset (n = 402). This can be used to risk stratify patients into low, moderate and high-risk groups with a statistically significant difference between the three groups in their survival distributions. 83.8% of patients in the low-risk group survived two years after surgery compared to 55.6% in the moderate-risk group and 26.2% in the high-risk group. The score was shown to perform moderately well with an Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic curve (AUROC) value of 0.76 (95% CI: 0.73-0.79) and 0.70 (95% CI: 0.64-0.76) in the derivation and validation cohorts respectively.

DISCUSSION

The LNC-PATH score predicts 2-year overall survival after surgery for NSCLC. This may allow the development of risk stratified follow-up protocols in survivorship clinics which could be the subject of future prospective studies.

Health Economic Evaluations of Cancer in Brazil: A Systematic Review

Background: A large number of health economic evaluation (HEE) studies have been published in developed countries. However, Brazilian HEE literature in oncology has not been studied.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate whether the scientific literature has provided a set of HEE in oncology capable of supporting decision making in the Brazilian context. Methods: A systematic review was conducted to identify and characterize studies in this field. We searched multiple databases selecting partial and full HEE studies in oncology (1998-2013). Results: Fifty-five articles were reviewed, of these, 33 (60%) were full health economic evaluations. Type of cancers most frequently studied were: breast (38.2%), cervical (14.6%), lung (10.9%) and colorectal (9.1%). Procedures (47.3%) were the technologies most frequently evaluated. In terms of the intended purposes of the technologies, most (63.6%) were treatments. The majority of the incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) reported have been below the cost-effectiveness threshold suggested by the World Health Organization (WHO). Conclusions: There has been an increase in the number of HEEs related to cancer in Brazil. These studies may support decision-making processes regarding the coverage of and reimbursement of healthcare technologies for cancer treatment in Brazil.

Asymptomatic recurrence detection and cost-effectiveness in urothelial carcinoma

For the management of muscle-invasive bladder cancer or upper tract urothelial carcinoma, the set guidelines recommend regular surveillance after radical cystectomy or radical nephroureterectomy. However, the prognostic benefit of regular oncological surveillance remains controversial in the absence of prospective studies although several retrospective studies with relatively large sample sizes have demonstrated the association between asymptomatic recurrence and better oncological outcomes. Seven out of eight studies reported that patients diagnosed with symptomatic recurrence showed significantly poorer prognosis in comparison to those diagnosed with asymptomatic recurrence. However, potential lead-time and length-time biases prevent the determination of any benefit of regular surveillance. In addition, an optimal surveillance protocol has yet to be established because conventional pathology-based protocols cannot identify the heterogenetic tumor biology of urothelial carcinoma, such as rapid- or slow-growing form of the disease. Several studies suggest that conventional pathology-based surveillance resulted in reduced cost-effectiveness. Recurrence risk-score stratified surveillance protocol including clinical and pathological factors may improve cost-effectiveness. The establishment of optimal risk stratification and surveillance strategies are required to improve the efficacy of regular oncological surveillance. Well-planned prospective studies are necessary to address the prognostic benefit of regular oncological surveillance and shared decision making.

Playing the odds: lung cancer surveillance after curative surgery

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

After 'curative' resection, many patients are still at risk for further lung cancer, either as a recurrence or a new metachronous primary. In theory, close follow-up should improve survival by catching relapse early - but in reality, many experts feel that surveillance for recurrence is of uncertain value. In this article, we explore the reasons behind the controversy, what the current guidelines recommend, and what future solutions are in development that may ultimately resolve this debate.

RECENT FINDINGS

Although postoperative surveillance for a new lung cancer may impart a survival advantage, this benefit does not appear to extend to the phenomenon of recurrence. Nevertheless, close radiographic follow-up after curative resection is still recommended by most professional societies, with more frequent scanning in the first 2 years, and then annual screening thereafter. Given the radiation risk, however, low-dose and minimal-dose computed tomography options are under investigation, as well as timing scans around expected peaks of recurrence rather than a set schedule.

SUMMARY

Applying the same surveillance algorithm to all lung cancer patients after curative resection may not be cost-effective or reasonable, especially if there is no demonstrable mortality benefit. Therefore, future research should focus on finding safer nonradiographic screening options, such as blood or breath biomarkers, or developing nomograms for predicting which patients will relapse and require closer follow-up. Ultimately, however, better tools for surveillance may be moot until we develop better treatment options for lung cancer recurrence.

Pattern of Imaging after Lung Cancer Resection. 1992-2005

RATIONALE

Imaging intensity after lung cancer resection performed with curative intent is unknown.

OBJECTIVES

To describe the pattern and trends in the use of computed tomography (CT) and positron emission tomography (PET) scans in patients after resection of early-stage lung cancer.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of the linked Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER)-Medicare database. Subjects included 8,621 Medicare beneficiaries (age, ≥66 yr) who underwent lung cancer resection with curative intent between 1992 and 2005. A surveillance CT or PET examination was defined as CT or PET imaging performed in an outpatient setting on patients who did not undergo chest radiography in the preceding 30 days.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Overall, imaging use was higher within the first 2 years versus Years 3-5 after surgical resection. Use of surveillance CT scans increased sharply from 13.7 to 57.3% of those diagnosed in 1996-1997 and 2004-2005, respectively. PET scan use increased threefold, from 6.2% in 2000-2001 to 19.6% in 2004-2005. In multivariable analyses, we observed a 32% increase in the odds of undergoing surveillance CT or PET imaging for every year of diagnosis between 1998 and 2005. There was no substantial decline in the odds of having a surveillance CT or PET scan during each successive follow-up period, suggesting no change in the intensity of surveillance over the first 5 years after surgical resection. The proportion of surveillance CT imaging performed at freestanding imaging centers increased from 18.0% in 1998-1999 to 30.6% in 2004-2005.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of CT and PET imaging for surveillance after curative-intent surgical resection of early-stage lung cancer increased sharply in the United States between 1997-1998 and 2005. In the absence of evidence demonstrating favorable outcomes, this practice was likely driven by prevailing expert opinion embedded in clinical practice guidelines made available during that time. Research is clearly needed to determine the role and optimal approach to surveillance thoracic imaging after surgical resection of lung cancer.

Detecting asymptomatic recurrence after radical nephroureterectomy contributes to better prognosis in patients with upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma

Background

The prognostic benefit of regular follow-up to detect asymptomatic recurrence after radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) remains unclear. We aimed to assess whether regular follow-up to detect asymptomatic recurrence after RNU improves patient survival.

Materials and Methods

We retrospectively analysed 415 patients who underwent RNU for upper tract urothelial carcinoma at four hospitals between January 1995 and February 2017. All patients had regular follow-up examinations after RNU including urine cytology, blood biochemical tests, and computed tomography. We investigated the first site and date of tumor recurrence. Overall survivals of patients who developed recurrence, stratified by mode of recurrence (asymptomatic vs. symptomatic group), were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method with the log-rank test. Cox proportional hazards regression analysis was performed using inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) to evaluate the impact of the mode of recurrence on survival.

Results

Of the 415 patients, 108 (26%) experienced disease recurrences after RNU. Of these, 62 (57%) were asymptomatic and 46 (43%) were symptomatic at the time of diagnosis. The most common recurrence site and symptom were lymph nodes and pain, respectively. Overall survival after RNU and time from recurrence to death in the asymptomatic group were significantly longer than that in the symptomatic group. Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that symptomatic recurrence was an independent risk factor for overall survival after RNU and survival from recurrence to death.

Conclusions

Routine oncological follow-up for detection of asymptomatic recurrence contributes to a better prognosis after RNU.

A prospective study of telephonic contact and subsequent physical follow-up of radically treated lung cancer patients

BACKGROUND

We tested the hypothesis that telephonic follow-up (FU) may offer a convenient and equivalent alternative to physical FU of radically treated lung cancer patients.

DESIGN

Prospective study carried out at a tertiary referral cancer care institute, Mumbai.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Two hundred consecutive lung cancer patients treated with curative intent were followed up regularly with telephonic interviews paired with their routine physical FU visits. Patient satisfaction with the telephonic call and the physical visit, the anxiety level of the patient after meeting the physician and the economic burden of the visit to the patient were noted in a descriptive manner. Kappa statistics was used to assess concurrence between the telephonic and physical impression of disease status.

RESULTS

With a median FU duration of 21.5 months, the median satisfaction scores for telephonic and physical FU were 8 and 9, respectively. The prevalence and bias adjusted kappa (PABAK) score of the entire cohort of patients was 0.64 (95% confidence interval [CI] =0.58-0.70). Data analyzed up to first disease progression/relapse on FU had a PABAK score of 0.71 (95% CI = 0.64-0.77) indicating substantial agreement. Patients with disease controlled at the FU had a significant PABAK score of 0.88 (95% CI = 0.80-0.94) indicating excellent concurrence. On average, each patient spent Rs. 5117.10 on travel and Rs. 3079.06 on lodging per FU visit.

CONCLUSION

Telephonic FU is substantially accurate in assessing disease status until the first relapse. In a resource-constrained country like India, it is worthwhile to further explore the benefits of such an alternative strategy.

Detecting asymptomatic recurrence after radical cystectomy contributes to better prognosis in patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer

The prognostic benefit of oncological follow-up to detect asymptomatic recurrence after radical cystectomy (RC) remains unclear. We aimed to assess whether routine follow-up to detect asymptomatic recurrence after RC improves patient survival. We retrospectively analyzed 581 RC cases for muscle-invasive bladder cancer at four hospitals between May 1996 and February 2017. All patients had regular follow-up examinations with urine cytology, blood biochemical tests, and computed tomography after RC. We investigated the first site and date of tumor recurrence. Overall survival in patients with recurrence stratified by the mode of recurrence (asymptomatic group vs. symptomatic group) was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method with the log-rank test. Cox proportional hazards regression analysis via inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was used to evaluate the impact of the mode of diagnosing recurrence on survival. Of the 581 patients, 175 experienced relapse. Among those, 12 without adequate data were excluded. Of the remaining 163 patients, 76 (47%) were asymptomatic and 87 (53%) were symptomatic at the time of diagnosis. The most common recurrence site and symptom were lymph nodes (47%) and pain (53%), respectively. Time of overall survival after RC and from recurrence to death was significantly longer in the asymptomatic group than in the symptomatic group. A multivariate Cox regression analysis using IPTW showed that in the patients with symptomatic recurrence was an independent risk factor for overall survival after RC and survival from recurrence to death. Routine oncological follow-up for detection of asymptomatic recurrence contributes to a better prognosis after RC.

Detection of Recurrence Patterns After Wedge Resection for Early Stage Lung Cancer: Rationale for Radiologic Follow-Up

BACKGROUND

Wedge resection for selected patients with early stage non-small cell lung cancer is considered to be a valid treatment option. The aim of this study was to evaluate the recurrence patterns after wedge resection, to analyze the survival of patients under routine follow-up, and to recommend a follow-up regimen.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was done of 446 consecutive patients between May 2000 and December 2012 who underwent a wedge resection for clinical stage I non-small cell lung cancer. All patients were followed up with a computed tomography scan with or without contrast. The recurrence was recorded as local (involving the same lobe of wedge resection), regional (involving mediastinal or hilar lymph nodes or a different lobe), or distant (including distant metastasis and pleural disease).

RESULTS

Median follow-up for survivors (n = 283) was 44.6 months. In all, 163 patients died; median overall survival was 82.6 months. Thirty-six patients were diagnosed with new primary non-small cell lung cancer, and 152 with recurrence (79 local, 45 regional, and 28 distant). There was no difference in the incidence of recurrence detection detected by computed tomography scans with versus without contrast (p = 0.18). The cumulative incidence of local recurrences at 1, 2, and 3 years was higher than the cumulative incidence for local, regional, and distant recurrences: 5.2%, 11.1%, and 14.9% versus 3.7%, 6.6%, and 9.5% versus 2.3%, 4.7%, and 6.4%, respectively. Primary tumor diameter was associated with local recurrence in univariate analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Wedge resection for early stage non-small cell lung cancer is associated with a significant risk for local and regional recurrence. Long-term follow-up using noncontrast computed tomography scans at consistent intervals is appropriate to monitor for these recurrences.

Peri- and postoperative management of stage I-III Non Small Cell Lung Cancer: Which quality of care indicators are evidence-based?

Quality of care (QoC) has a central role in our health care system. The aim of this review is to present a set of evidence-based quality indicators for the surgical treatment and postoperative management of lung cancer. A search was performed through PubMed, Embase and the Cochrane library database, including English literature, published between 1980 and 2012. Search terms regarding 'lung neoplasms', 'surgical treatment' and 'quality of care' were used. Potential QoC indicators were divided into structure, process or outcome measures and a final selection was made based upon the level of evidence. High hospital volume and surgery performed by a thoracic surgeon, were identified as important structure indicators. Sleeve resection instead of pneumonectomy and the importance of treatment within a clinical care path setting were identified as evidence-based process indicators. A symptom-based follow-up regime was identified as a new QoC indicator. These indicators can be used for registration, benchmarking and ultimately quality improvement in lung cancer surgery.

Characteristics and outcome of unplanned hospital admissions in patients with lung cancer: a longitudinal tertiary center study. Towards a strategy to reduce the burden

BACKGROUND

Unplanned hospital admissions (UHAs) are frequent in lung cancer, but literature on this topic is scarce. The aim of this study is to gain insight in the demographics, patterns of referral, causes, presenting symptoms, and final outcome of these UHAs. A strategy to improve quality of care and reduce the number and cost of UHAs was suggested based upon these findings.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In retrospective analysis of all consecutive UHAs in a 6-month period in a tertiary center, demographics, pattern of referral, clinical data, tumor control status, final diagnosis, duration of hospitalization, and outcome were examined.

RESULTS

Two hundred seven UHAs were recorded. Male/female ratio was 185/62, mean age 65.5 years, performance status (PS) on admission 0-1 in 32 %, 2 in 37.2 %, and 3-4 in 30.8 % of patients. Patient referral occurred by general practitioner in 33.6 % or specialist in 25.5 % and in 40.9 % on own initiative. UHAs were therapy-related in 23.9 %, cancer-related in 47.4 %, comorbidity-related in 19.4 %, or of unclear nature in 9.3 %. Most frequent causes were infections (21.9 %) and respiratory problems (17.0 %). Mean length of stay was 9.5 days. Final outcome was 10.1 % mortality, 6.9 % hospice care transfers, and 79.4 % home returns (including 18.2 % same day returns).

CONCLUSION

UHAs in lung cancer were more cancer- than therapy-related. Majority of patients (2/3) were not seen by their general practitioner. A significant number of same day returns were noted. UHAs in patients with poor PS, uncontrolled cancer and cancer-related events had the worst outcome. This work is a first step in identifying specific characteristics of UHAs in lung cancer patients, which may lead to strategies to reduce the burden of UHAs.

Postoperative follow-up strategy based on recurrence dynamics for non-small-cell lung cancer

OBJECTIVES

Our study was designed to visually represent recurrence patterns after surgery for non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with the use of event dynamics and to clarify postoperative follow-up methods based on the times of recurrence.

METHODS

A total of 829 patients with NSCLC who underwent complete pulmonary resection from 2005 to 2007 in 9 hospitals affiliated with the Yokohama Consortium of Thoracic Surgeons were studied. Event dynamics, based on the hazard rate, were evaluated. Only first events involving the development of distant metastases, local recurrence or both were considered. The effects of sex, histological type, pathological stage and age were studied.

RESULTS

The hazard rate curve displayed an initial surge that peaked about 6-8 months after surgery. The next distinct peak was noted at the end of the second year of follow-up. On non-parametric kernel smoothing, the maximum peak was found 6-8 months after surgery in men. In women, the highest peak occurred 22-24 months after surgery, which was about 16 months later than the peak in men. The peak timing of the hazard curve was not affected by histological type, pathological stage or age in either sex.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that the timing of recurrence after surgery for lung cancer is characterized by a bimodal pattern, and the times with the highest risk of recurrence were suggested to differ between men and women. Postoperative follow-up strategies should be based on currently recommended follow-up programmes, take into account the recurrence patterns of lung cancer, and be modified as required to meet the needs of individual patients.

Surgical Treatment of Lung Cancer

In this chapter, we discuss the preoperative evaluation that is necessary prior to surgical resection, stage-specific surgical management of lung cancer, and the procedural steps as well as the indications to a variety of surgical approaches to lung resection.

The dynamic pattern of recurrence in curatively resected non-small cell lung cancer patients: Experiences at a single institution

PURPOSE

To investigate the hazard function of tumor recurrence in patients with completely (R0) resected non-small cell lung cancer.

METHODS

A total of 1374 patients treated between 2003 and 2009 with complete resection and systematic lymph node dissection were studied. The risk of recurrence at a given time after operation was studied utilizing the cause-specific hazard function. Recurrence was categorized as local recurrence or distant recurrence. The risk distribution was assessed using clinical and pathological factors.

RESULTS

The hazard function for recurrence presented an early peak at approximately 10 months after surgery and maintained a tapered plateau-like tail extending up to 8 years. A similar risk pattern was detected for both local recurrence and distant recurrence, while the risk of distant recurrence was higher than that of local recurrence. The double-peaked pattern of hazard rate was present in several subgroups, such as p-stage IA patients. A comparison of histology and status of nodal involvement showed that pN1-2 adenocarcinoma patients demonstrated a high hazard rate of distant recurrence and that pN0 adenocarcinoma patients exhibited a small recurrent risk for a longer time. Squamous cell carcinoma patients showed only little difference in risk.

CONCLUSIONS

The data may be useful to select patients at high risk of recurrence and may provide information for each patient to decide how to manage the postoperative follow-up individually.

Imaging surveillance and survival for surgically resected non-small-cell lung cancer

INTRODUCTION

The importance of imaging surveillance after treatment for lung cancer is not well characterized. We examined the association between initial guideline recommended imaging surveillance and survival among early-stage resected non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients.

METHODS

A retrospective study was conducted using Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Medicare data (1995-2010). Surgically resected patients, with stage I and II NSCLC, were categorized by imaging received during the initial surveillance period (4-8 mo) after surgery. Primary outcome was overall survival. Secondary treatment interventions were examined as intermediary outcomes.

RESULTS

Most (88%) patients had at least one outpatient clinic visit, and 24% received an initial computerized tomography (CT) during the first surveillance period. Five-year survival by initial surveillance imaging was 61% for CT, 58% for chest radiography, and 60% for no imaging. After adjustment, initial CT was not associated with improved overall survival (hazard ratio [HR], 1.04; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.96-1.14). On subgroup analysis, restricted to patients with demonstrated initial postoperative follow-up, CT was associated with a lower overall risk of death for stage I patients (HR, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.74-0.98), but not for stage II (HR, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.71-1.42). There was no significant difference in rates of secondary interventions predicted by type of initial imaging surveillance.

CONCLUSIONS

Initial surveillance CT is not associated with improved overall or lung cancer-specific survival among early-stage NSCLC patients undergoing surgical resection. Stage I patients with early follow-up may represent a subpopulation that benefits from initial surveillance although this may be influenced by healthy patient selection bias.

How to follow up patients after curative resection of lung cancer

Survivors of lung cancer surgery are among the highest-risk patients for developing another lung cancer, yet there is no clear consensus on the method of surveillance for patients after curative surgical resection. Surveillance is no longer futile because the emergence of computed tomography screening has allowed the detection of recurrences and new metachronous cancers at an early stage. In selected patients, lung cancer identified recently on routine computed tomography scan is amenable to curative treatment and is associated with longer survival.

Does the method of radiologic surveillance affect survival after resection of stage I non-small cell lung cancer?

OBJECTIVES

Controversy persists regarding appropriate radiographic surveillance strategies after lung cancer resection. We compared the impact of surveillance computed tomography scan versus chest radiography in patients who underwent resection for stage I lung cancer.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was performed of all patients undergoing resection for pathologic stage I lung cancer from January 2000 to April 2013. After resection, follow-up included routine history and physical examination in conjunction with chest radiography or computed tomography at the discretion of the treating physician. Identification of successive lung malignancy (ie, recurrence at any new site or new primary) and survival were recorded.

RESULTS

There were 554 evaluable patients, with 232 receiving routine postoperative computed tomography and 322 receiving routine chest radiography. Postoperative 5-year survival was 67.8% in the computed tomography group versus 74.8% in the chest radiography group (P = .603). Successive lung malignancy was found in 27% (63/232) of patients receiving computed tomography versus 22% (72/322) receiving chest radiography (P = .19). The mean time from surgery to diagnosis of successive malignancy was 1.93 years for computed tomography versus 2.56 years for chest radiography (P = .046). For the computed tomography group, 41% (26/63) of successive malignancies were treated with curative intent versus 40% (29/72) in the chest radiography group (P = .639). Cox proportional hazard analysis indicated imaging modality (computed tomography vs chest radiography) was not associated with survival (P = .958).

CONCLUSIONS

Surveillance computed tomography may result in earlier diagnosis of successive malignancy versus chest radiography in stage I lung cancer, although no difference in survival was demonstrated. A randomized trial would help determine the impact of postoperative surveillance strategies on survival.

Detecting lung cancer relapse using self-evaluation forms weekly filled at home: the sentinel follow-up

PURPOSE

We aimed to assess if patients' ratings of symptoms can be used to provide an early indication of disease recurrence or progression in lung cancer. We proposed a simple self-evaluation form made of six clinical parameters weekly scored by patients at home as a follow-up--here named sentinel--to improve relapse detection. Its performances were compared to those of a routine imaging follow-up.

METHODS

Patients with lung cancer were prospectively recruited to weekly fill a form at home for self-assessing weight, fatigue, pain, appetite, cough, and breathlessness during at least 4 months. Each patient reported weight and assessed the severity of each symptom by grading it from 0 (no symptom) to 3 (major symptom). A score was retrospectively designed for discriminating patients with relapse from those without. Accuracy of relapse detection was then compared to values of the routine planned imaging.

RESULTS

Forty-three patients were included in our center and recruited for 16 weeks or more follow-up during which at least one tumor imaging assessment was performed (CT scan or PET-CT). Forty-one completed the form weekly. Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of sentinel were high (86, 93, 86 % and 93 vs 79, 96, 92, and 90 % for routine imaging--p = ns) and well correlated with relapse (pχ2 > 0.001). Moreover, relapses were detectable with sentinel on average 6 weeks earlier than the planned imaging.

CONCLUSION

This study suggests that a personalized cancer follow-up based on a weekly self-evaluation of six symptoms is feasible and may be accurate for earlier detection of lung cancer relapse, allowing integration in electronic devices for real-time patient outcome follow-up.

What is the most practical, optimal, and cost effective method for performing follow-up after lung cancer surgery, and by whom should it be done?

Surgery is the treatment of choice for early stage non-small cell lung cancer. In this context, postoperative follow-up is important to diagnose late postoperative complications, as well as to detect recurring cancer or new primaries as early as possible. There is, however, no high-quality evidence regarding the benefits of monitoring programs on survival and quality of life. Most studies recommend clinical and radiological follow-up (radiograph or chest computed tomography) performed more intensively during the first two years and annually thereafter. The physician doing the follow-up can be the thoracic surgeon, the diagnosing physician, or the family physician.

Postoperative surveillance for non-small cell lung cancer resected with curative intent: developing a patient-centered approach

Local recurrence or the development of metachronous cancer after surgical therapy for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is not uncommon, and these conditions are often amenable to curative therapy. Predictors of recurrence based on surgical, patient, and pathologic factors are well known. A literature search was performed for articles regarding identification or treatment with curative intent of early local recurrence or metachronous cancer after resection of NSCLC. A patient-centered algorithm for surveillance after resection can be developed based on both risk of recurrence and potential benefit from further treatment to optimize individual follow-up algorithms.

What is the most effective follow-up model for lung cancer patients? A systematic review

INTRODUCTION

In the U.K. more than 40,000 people are diagnosed with lung cancer every year and an estimated 65,000 people are living with lung cancer. The most effective follow-up strategy for these patients is undetermined. This article reports a systematic review of studies comparing different follow-up strategies for patients with lung cancer.

METHODS

We searched Medline, Premedline, Embase, Cochrane Library, Cinahl, BNI, Psychinfo, Amed, Web of Science (SCI & SSCI), and Biomed Central and included any original study published in English comparing one type of follow-up strategy to another in patients with lung cancer who had received treatment with curative or palliative intent and/or best supportive care. Studies were included if there were 50 patients or more per follow-up group.

RESULTS

Of the four included studies that compared different follow-up strategies in patients with lung cancer, one was a randomized controlled trial and three were retrospective. The studies all examined different follow-up strategies and tended to be marked by various limitations. No formal data synthesis was therefore possible. However, in one article there was some evidence that regular review was associated with less emergency-department crisis attendances than symptom-generated review.

CONCLUSIONS

The included studies were marked by a number of methodological compromises. On the basis of the reported body of evidence it is therefore not possible to make any firm conclusions about the most effective follow-up strategy but the review has identified a need for urgent research into all aspects of follow-up.

Combined Modality Treatment of Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer

Among all nonmetastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients, the best survival rates are observed in patients who undergo surgery. Nevertheless, 5-year survival rates vary between 20% and 60% depending on the stage of the disease. Several combined modality treatments have been investigated to improve outcome in localized NSCLC. These include local treatment, systemic before local treatment, concomitant systemic and local treatments, and systemic after local treatment. Preoperative irradiation was shown to be of no benefit on local recurrence rates or overall survival. Even doses of radiation >/=40 grays (Gy) were associated with lower survival rates. Postoperative irradiation did not influence survival in stage III disease and seemed to be deleterious in stages I and II disease. Modern radiotherapy techniques might be of interest in this setting but have been insufficiently tested. The early phase III studies of preoperative chemotherapy versus primary surgery in stage III NSCLC showed a tremendous difference in favor of chemotherapy. A larger study did not confirm these results but suggested that preoperative chemotherapy might have a greater effect in stages I and II of the disease. In locally advanced disease, chemotherapy followed by radiotherapy was shown to increase survival when compared with radiotherapy alone. Studies comparing concurrent chemoradiation with radiotherapy only were in favor of the concomitant schedule, which improved local control. Promising results have been reported with chemoradiation followed by surgery in stage IIIa and even stage IIIb disease. Randomized studies of postoperative chemotherapy demonstrated a 5% improvement in 5-year survival over adjuvant-free treatment. Postoperative chemoradiation showed no advantage over postoperative radiotherapy. Several trials that are ongoing or whose accrual was recently completed should further define the role of perioperative chemotherapy in resectable NSCLC and of trimodality treatments in advanced disease. Targeted agents are being developed in the postoperative setting. New schedules of chemoradiation with higher therapeutic indexes are also being investigated in nonresectable stage III NSCLC.

Is computed tomography follow-up of patients after lobectomy for non-small cell lung cancer of benefit in terms of survival?

A best evidence topic in cardiothoracic surgery was written according to a structured protocol. The question addressed was whether following up patients after lobectomy for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with computed tomography (CT) scanning is of benefit in terms of survival. Altogether, 448 papers were found using the reported search, of which five represented the best evidence to answer the clinical question and three provided supporting evidence. The authors, journal, date and country of publication, patient group studied, study type, relevant outcomes and results of these papers are tabulated. There is no general consensus in the literature. From the limited number of papers that address the effect of CT follow-up on survival following surgery for NSCLC, three showed that CT scanning may improve the survival of patients by detecting local and distant recurrences at an earlier stage when the patient is asymptomatic. One paper showed that detection by the use of low-dose CT or simultaneous chest CT plus positron emission tomography-CT led to a longer duration of survival compared with detection by clinical suspicion (2.1 ± 0.3 vs 3.6 ± 0.2 years, p = 0.002). However, two papers broadly showed that follow-up with CT does not improve survival outcomes regardless of the site of recurrence. One such study showed that there was no clinically significant difference in survival whether patients were followed up using a strict CT protocol compared with a symptom-based follow-up (median survival after recurrence: strict 7.9 months, symptom-based 6.6 months, p = 0.219). The remaining papers supported the use of CT as a screening tool for recurrence but did not comment directly on survival. Owing to the limited and contradictory evidence, there is a need for an randomized controlled trial to assess the survival outcomes of patients followed up with a CT screening protocol vs a symptom-based follow-up.

Surveillance of resected non-small cell lung cancer

Lung cancer is the most common cancer in the world. 15 % of all patients with lung cancer are diagnosed at an early stage, and surgery is the treatment of choice for them. 40 % of all patients survive more than 5 years after surgery, and most of them die as a result of systemic disease. Half of all recurrences are diagnosed within the first 24 months after curative treatment, and 90 % in the first 5 years. Despite this, it is not standardized who should do the monitoring, what additional tests are needed and how often should they be performed. We present here a review on the various recommendations in clinical guidelines.

Survival benefits from follow-up of patients with lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

The burden of lung cancer is high for patients and carers. Care after treatment may have the potential to impact on this. We reviewed the published literature on follow-up strategies intended to improve survival and quality of life.

METHODS

We systematically reviewed studies comparing follow-up regimes in lung cancer. Primary outcomes were overall survival (comparing more intensive versus less intensive follow-up) and survival comparing symptomatic with asymptomatic recurrence. Quality of life was identified as a secondary outcome measure. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals from eligible studies were synthesized.

RESULTS

Nine studies that examined the role of more intensive follow-up for patients with lung cancer were included (eight observational studies and one randomized controlled trial). The studies of curative resection included patients with non-small cell lung cancer Stages I to III disease, and studies of palliative treatment follow-up included limited and extensive stage patients with small cell lung cancer. A total of 1669 patients were included in the studies. Follow-up programs were heterogeneous and multifaceted. A nonsignificant trend for intensive follow-up to improve survival was identified, for the curative intent treatment subgroup (HR: 0.83; 95% confidence interval: 0.66-1.05). Asymptomatic recurrence was associated with increased survival, which was statistically significant HR: 0.61 (0.50-0.74) (p < 0.01); quality of life was only assessed in one study.

CONCLUSIONS

This meta-analysis must be interpreted with caution due to the potential for bias in the included studies: observed benefit may be due to systematic differences in outcomes rather than intervention effects. Some benefit was noted from intensive follow-up strategies. More robust data, in the form of randomized controlled trials, are needed to confirm these findings as the review is based primarily on observational studies. Future research should also include patient-centered outcomes to investigate the impact of follow-up regimes on living with lung cancer and psychosocial well-being.