Complications associated with thoracocentesis

Subcutaneous and muscle layer seroma complicated with thoracentesis

Diagnostic thoracentesis is a basic and relatively safe diagnostic method for patients with pleural effusion. However, complications of thoracentesis are rare and not well known because of the low incidence. Herein, we report a case of subcutaneous and muscle layer seroma following thoracentesis.

Special Procedures for Pulmonary Disease in the Emergency Department

In the emergency department, there are infrequent but essential procedures related to pulmonary diseases that emergency physicians must be able to perform. These include thoracentesis, chest tube thoracostomy, tracheostomy manipulation, and fiberoptic intubation.

Managing complications of pleural procedures

Pleural disease is common and often requires procedural intervention. Given this prevalence, pleural procedures are performed by a wide range of providers with varying skill level in both medical and surgical specialties. Even though the overall complication rate of pleural procedures is low, the proximity to vital organs and blood vessels can lead to serious complications which if left unrecognized can be life threatening. As a result, it is of the utmost importance for the provider to have a firm grasp of the local anatomy both conceptually when preparing for the procedure and physically, via physical exam and the use of a real time imaging modality such as ultrasound, when performing the procedure. With this in mind, anyone who wishes to safely perform pleural procedures should be able to appropriately anticipate, quickly identify, and efficiently manage any potential complication including not only those seen with many procedures such as pain, bleeding, and infection but also those specific to procedures performed in the thorax such as pneumothorax, re-expansional pulmonary edema, and regional organ injury. In this article, we will review the basic approach to most pleural procedures along with essential local anatomy most often encountered during these procedures. This will lay the foundation for the remainder of the article where we will discuss clinical manifestations and management of various pleural procedure complications.

Small Drainage Volumes of Pleural Effusions Are Associated with Complications in Critically Ill Patients: A Retrospective Analysis

Pleural effusions are a common finding in critically ill patients and small bore chest drains (SBCD) are proven to be efficient for pleural drainage. The data on the potential benefits and risks of drainage remains controversial. We aimed to determine the cut-off volume for complications, to investigate the impact of pleural drainage and drained volume on clinically relevant outcomes. Medical records of all critically ill patients undergoing insertion of SBCD were retrospectively examined. We screened 13,003 chest radiographs and included 396 SBCD cases in the final analysis. SBCD drained on average 900 mL, with less amount in patients with complications (p = 0.003). A drainage volume of 975 mL in 24 h represented the optimal threshold for complications. Pneumothorax was the most frequent complication (4.5%), followed by bleeding (0.8%). Female and lighter-weighted patients experienced a higher risk for any complication. We observed an improvement in the arterial partial pressure of oxygen and respiratory quotient (p < 0.001). We conclude that the small drainage volumes are associated with complications in critically ill patients—the more you drain, the safer the procedure gets. The use of SBCD is a safe and efficient procedure, further investigations regarding the higher rate of complications in female and lighter-weighted patients are desirable.

Safety of Thoracentesis and Tube Thoracostomy in Patients With Uncorrected Coagulopathy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Thoracentesis and tube thoracostomy are common procedures with bleeding risks, but existing guidelines may be overly conservative. We reviewed the evidence on the safety of thoracentesis and tube thoracostomy in patients with uncorrected coagulopathy.

RESEARCH QUESTION

Is it safe to perform thoracentesis and tube thoracostomy in patients with uncorrected coagulopathy?

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

This systematic review was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis guidelines. PubMed and Embase were searched from inception through December 31, 2019. Included studies involved patients with uncorrected coagulopathy because of disease (eg, thrombocytopenia, liver cirrhosis, kidney failure) or drugs (eg, antiplatelets, anticoagulants). Relevant outcomes were major bleeding and mortality.

RESULTS

Eighteen studies (5,134 procedures) were included. Using random-effects meta-analysis, the pooled major bleeding and mortality rate was 0 (95% CI, 0%-1%). No publication bias was found. Excluding six studies that were in abstract form, meta-analysis of the remaining 12 full articles showed that the pooled major bleeding and mortality rate also was 0 (95% CI, 0%-2%). Subgroup analysis performed for patients with uncorrected coagulopathy resulting from disease or drugs showed similar results.

INTERPRETATION

Among patients with uncorrected coagulopathy who underwent thoracentesis or tube thoracostomy, major bleeding and mortality complications were uncommon. Our results suggest that in appropriately selected patients, thoracentesis or tube thoracostomy can be performed safely.

TRIAL REGISTRY

PROSPERO; No.: CRD42020152226; URL: www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/.

Physician Practice Patterns for Performing Thoracentesis in Patients Taking Anticoagulant Medications

BACKGROUND

Patients undergoing thoracentesis often have comorbid conditions or take medications that potentially put them at higher bleeding risk. Direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) use has also increased significantly. There are no published guidelines or consensus on when to perform thoracentesis in patients on anticoagulants. Recent studies support the safety of a more liberal approach for thoracentesis among patients with coagulopathy.

METHODS

We conducted a survey to ascertain the practices of physicians regarding thoracentesis in patients with increased bleeding risk. The survey was administered to the email distribution lists of the American Association of Bronchology and Interventional Pulmonology and of the American Thoracic Society.

RESULTS

The survey was completed by 256 attending physicians. Most of them were general pulmonologists practicing at academic medical centers. Most of them would perform a thoracentesis in patients receiving acetylsalicylic acid or prophylactic doses of unfractionated heparin or low molecular weight heparin (96%, 89%, and 88%, respectively). Half of the respondents would perform a thoracentesis in patients on antiplatelet medications (clopidogrel and ticagrelor, 51%; ticlopidine, 53%). A minority would perform thoracentesis in patients on direct oral anticoagulants or infused thrombin inhibitors (19% and 12%, respectively). The only subgroup that had a higher proclivity for performing thoracentesis without holding medications were attending physicians practicing for under 10 years. Relative to noninterventional pulmonologists, there were no significant differences in the responses of interventional pulmonologists.

CONCLUSION

There was variation in the practice patterns of attending physicians in performing thoracentesis in patients with elevated bleeding risk. Further data and guidelines regarding the safety of thoracentesis in these patients are needed.

Real-time ultrasound-guided thoracentesis in the intensive care unit: prevalence of mechanical complications

Background

The use of thoracic ultrasound during thoracentesis reduces complications. The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of complications for real-time ultrasound-guided thoracentesis performed by intensivists. As a secondary objective, the change in oxygenation before and after the procedure was evaluated.

Patients and methods

An observational prospective study was conducted. A total of 81 cases of real-time ultrasound-guided thoracentesis performed by intensivists in the intensive care unit (ICU) of Méderi Major University Hospital, Bogotá, Colombia, between August 2018 and August 2019 were analyzed. Thoracentesis performed by interventional radiologists and using techniques different from the focus of this study were excluded from the analysis.

Results

There was one pneumothorax, for a prevalence rate of mechanical complications in this population of 1.2%. The mean partial oxygen pressure to inspired oxygen fraction ratio (PaO₂/FiO₂) prior to the procedure was 198.1 (95% CI 184.75–211.45), with a PaO₂/FiO₂ after the procedure of 224.6 (95% CI 213.08–226.12) (p < 0.05).

Conclusions

Real-time ultrasound-guided thoracentesis performed by intensivists is a safe procedure and leads to a significant improvement in oxygenation rates. Future studies are required to determine the impact of these results on other outcomes, such as mortality, ICU stay, and days of mechanical ventilation.

Incidence and risk factors of pneumothorax following pre-procedural ultrasound-guided thoracentesis

Background

Data regarding the incidence and risk factors of pneumothorax following pre-procedural ultrasound (US)-guided thoracentesis is scarce. We aimed to evaluate the incidence and risk factors of pneumothorax following pre-procedural US-guided thoracentesis in a tertiary medical center.

Methods

Retrospective analysis of patients who underwent pre-procedural US-guided thoracentesis in Sheba Medical Center between January 2016 and December 2018. Data collected included incidence of pneumothorax following thoracentesis, baseline clinical and demographic characteristics, and thoracentesis-associated factors. Outcomes evaluated included length of hospital stay, mortality, chest tube insertion and intensive care unit admission.

Results

A total of 550 patients with pleural effusions underwent pre-procedural US-guided thoracentesis. Sixty-six (12%) of them developed pneumothorax. Compared to patients who did not develop pneumothorax, those who developed pneumothorax had a higher rate of congestive heart failure (32.2% vs. 47%, P=0.026), a smaller depth of pleural fluid marking (3.4 vs. 3.2 cm, P=0.024), a larger amount of pleural fluid drained (1,093 vs. 903.5 mL, P=0.01), and were more likely to undergo bilateral procedures (7.6% vs. 2.3%, P=0.044). In the multivariate regression analysis, volume of pleural fluid drained was significantly associated with the development of pneumothorax (OR, 1.001, 95% CI, 1–1.001; P=0.042).

Conclusions

The incidence of pneumothorax following pre-procedural US-guided thoracentesis was relatively high in the present study. The amount of pleural fluid drained was the main factor associated with the risk of developing pneumothorax in these cases.

Safety and Tolerability of Vacuum Versus Manual Drainage During Thoracentesis: A Randomized Trial

BACKGROUND

Pleural effusions may be aspirated manually or via vacuum during thoracentesis. This study compares the safety, pain level, and time involved in these techniques.

METHODS

We randomized 100 patients receiving ultrasound-guided unilateral thoracentesis in an academic medical center from December 2015 through September 2017 to either vacuum or manual drainage. Without using pleural manometry, the effusion was drained completely or until the development of refractory symptoms. Measurements included self-reported pain before and during the procedure (from 0 to 10), time for completion of drainage, and volume removed. Primary outcomes were rates of all-cause complications and of early termination of the procedure with secondary outcomes of change in pain score, drainage time, volume removed, and inverse rate of removal.

RESULTS

Patient characteristics in the manual (n=49) and vacuum (n=51) groups were similar. Rate of all-cause complications was higher in the vacuum group (5 vs. 0; P=0.03): pneumothorax (n=3), surgically treated hemothorax with subsequent death (n=1) and reexpansion pulmonary edema causing respiratory failure (n=1), as was rate of early termination (8 vs. 1; P=0.018). The vacuum group exhibited greater pain during drainage (P<0.05), shorter drainage time (P<0.01), no association with volume removed (P>0.05), and lower inverse rate of removal (P≤0.01).

CONCLUSION

Despite requiring less time, vacuum aspiration during thoracentesis was associated with higher rates of complication and of early termination of the procedure and greater pain. Although larger studies are needed, this pilot study suggests that manual aspiration provides greater safety and patient comfort.

Left ventricular puncture during thoracentesis

Left ventricular puncture during a thoracentesis is a rare and unusual complication that has yet to be reported. We report a case in which a 74-year-old woman with dilated ischaemic heart disease suffered from puncture of the left ventricle during a routine ultrasound-guided thoracentesis despite following the recommended protocol and procedures. She became haemodynamically unstable and underwent an emergent thoracotomy for removal of the catheter and repair of the left ventricular wall.

Utility of pleural effusion drainage in the ICU: An updated systematic review and META-analysis

PURPOSE

The effects on the respiratory or hemodynamic function of drainage of pleural effusion on critically ill patients are not completely understood. First outcome was to evaluate the PiO₂/FiO₂ (P/F) ratio before and after pleural drainage.

SECONDARY OUTCOMES

evaluation of A-a gradient, End-Expiratory lung volume (EELV), heart rate (HR), mean arterial pressure (mAP), left ventricular end-diastolic volume (LVEDV), stroke volume (SV), cardiac output (CO), ejection fraction (EF), and E/A waves ratio (E/A). A tertiary outcome: evaluation of pneumothorax and hemothorax complications.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Searches were performed on MEDLINE, EMBASE, COCHRANE LIBRARY, SCOPUS and WEB OF SCIENCE databases from inception to June 2018 (PROSPERO CRD42018105794).

RESULTS

We included 31 studies (2265 patients). Pleural drainage improved the P/F ratio (SMD: -0.668; CI: -0.947-0.389; p < .001), EELV (SMD: -0.615; CI: -1.102-0.219; p = .013), but not A-a gradient (SMD: 0.218; CI: -0.273-0.710; p = .384). HR, mAP, LVEDV, SV, CO, E/A and EF were not affected. The risks of pneumothorax (proportion: 0.008; CI: 0.002-0.014; p = .138) and hemothorax (proportion: 0.006; CI: 0.001-0.011; p = .962) were negligible.

CONCLUSIONS

Pleural effusion drainage improves oxygenation of critically ill patients. It is a safe procedure. Further studies are needed to assess the hemodynamic effects of pleural drainage.

Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS): unnecessary gadgetry or evidence-based medicine?

Over the last decade there has been increasing interest and enthusiasm in point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) as an aide to traditional examination techniques in assessing acutely unwell adult patients. However, it currently remains the domain of a relatively small handful of physicians within the UK. There are numerous reasons for this, notably a lack of training pathways and supervisors but also a lack of understanding of the evidence base behind this imaging modality. This review article aims to explore some of the evidence base behind POCUS for a number of medical pathologies, and where possible compare it to evidenced traditional examination techniques. We discuss the issues around training in bedside ultrasound and recommend a push to integrate POCUS training into internal medicine curricula and support trainers to comprehensively deliver this.

Diagnostic Accuracy of Lateral Decubitus Chest Radiography before Pleural Maneuvers for the Management of Pleurisies in the Era of Chest Ultrasound

BACKGROUND

Chest ultrasound (CUS) is the gold standard to detect pleural adhesions before pleural maneuvers. However, the CUS technique is not available in all countries where the assessment is only based on clinical examination and chest radiography.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the value of lateral decubitus chest radiography (LDCR) to detect pleural adhesions.

METHODS

Consecutive patients with pleural effusions undergoing LCDR followed by medical thoracoscopy the day after were identified from an institutional database. The diagnostic sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and accuracy for LDCR were calculated.

RESULTS

Eighty-six patients were included in the study. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of LDCR for the presence of adhesions taking into account the shape of the horizontal level were 71.2% (56.7-82.5), 44.1% (27.6-61.9), 66.1% (52.1-77.8), and 50% (31.7-68.3), respectively. The accuracy to predict pleural adhesions for the sign "incomplete horizontal level" was 60.5 (49.3-70.7). The accuracy to predict pleural adhesions in case of irregular aspect of the horizontal level was 53.5 (42.5-64.2).

CONCLUSIONS

The accuracy of LDCR for the detection of pleural adhesions is low in patients with pleural effusion and LDCR is not sufficient before pleural maneuvers. This has to be taken into account in countries with a high prevalence of pleural tuberculosis which usually lead to loculated pleural effusions. CUS has to be urgently included in dedicated educational programs in these areas in order to decrease the complications related to unexpected pleural adhesions and achieve better planning for the management of pleural effusions.

Deep Needle Procedures: Improving Safety With Ultrasound Visualization

Promoting patient safety and increasing health care quality have dominated the health care landscape during the last 15 years. Health care regulators and payers are now tying patient safety outcomes and best practices to hospital reimbursement. Many health care leaders are searching for new technologies that not only make health care for patients safer but also reduce overall health care costs. New advances in ultrasonography have made this technology available to health care providers at the patient's bedside. Point-of-care ultrasound assistance now aids providers with real-time diagnosis and with visualization for procedural guidance. This is especially true for common deep needle procedures such as central venous catheter insertion, thoracentesis, and paracentesis.There is now mounting evidence that clinician-performed point-of-care ultrasound improves patient safety, enhances health care quality, and reduces health care cost for deep needle procedures. Furthermore, the miniaturization, ease of use, and the evolving affordability of ultrasound have now made this technology widely available. The adoption of point-of-care ultrasonography has reached a tipping point and should be seriously considered the safety standard for all hospital-based deep needle procedures.

Complications of thoracentesis: incidence, risk factors, and strategies for prevention

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Although thoracentesis is generally considered safe, procedural complications are associated with increased morbidity, mortality, and healthcare costs. In this article, we review the risk factors and prevention of the most common complications of thoracentesis including pneumothorax, bleeding (chest wall hematoma and hemothorax), and re-expansion pulmonary edema.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recent data support the importance of operator expertise and the use of ultrasound in reducing the risk of iatrogenic pneumothorax. Although coagulopathy or thrombocytopenia and the use of anticoagulant or antiplatelet medications have traditionally been viewed as contraindications to thoracentesis, new evidence suggests that patients may be able to safely undergo thoracentesis without treating their bleeding risk. Re-expansion pulmonary edema, a rare complication of thoracentesis, is felt to result in part from the generation of excessively negative pleural pressure. When and how to monitor changes in pleural pressure during thoracentesis remains a focus of ongoing study.

SUMMARY

Major complications of thoracentesis are uncommon. Clinician awareness of risk factors for procedural complications and familiarity with strategies that improve outcomes are essential components for safely performing thoracentesis.

Incidence and risk factors of iatrogenic pneumothorax after thoracentesis in emergency department settings

Background

There is a lack of data regarding the incidence and associated factors of pneumothorax following thoracentesis conducted in emergency department (ED) settings. The present study aims to determine the incidence of pneumothorax following thoracentesis in ED settings and evaluate the association of specific demographics, clinical, and procedure factors with thoracentesis-related pneumothorax.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 3,067 thoracentesis cases in the ED of a tertiary care, university-affiliated hospital between January 2009 and December 2014. To evaluate the factors associated with the occurrence of pneumothorax following thoracentesis, matched controls were used with a case to control ratio of 1:5.

Results

Of the 3,067 cases that received thoracentesis, 19 cases of pneumothorax were observed (0.62%). Patients with pneumothorax had significantly lower weight and body mass index (BMI) than those without pneumothorax (51.0 vs. 61.2 kg, 20.0 vs. 22.6; P<0.001, respectively). In the multivariate logistic regression analysis, being underweight, defined as a BMI of <18.5 [OR, 5.2 (95% CI, 1.3-21.2); P=0.021] was significantly associated with the occurrence of pneumothorax.

Conclusions

The incidence of pneumothorax following thoracentesis was very low in the present study. However, clinicians should be aware of the risk of pneumothorax in underweight patients during thoracentesis. Further prospective studies are required to clarify the results of the present study.

Better With Ultrasound: Pleural Procedures in Critically Ill Patients

Procedures designed to drain fluid or air from the pleural spaces can be technically challenging in patients who are critically ill, and are associated with significant complications. Many individual ultrasound techniques have been described, each with the goal of making pleural drainage procedures safer. This article presents a systemic approach for incorporating many of these tools into procedures such as diagnostic thoracentesis, therapeutic drainage, and pleural catheter insertion. A series of illustrative figures and narrated video presentations are included to demonstrate many of the described techniques.

State of the art thoracic ultrasound: intervention and therapeutics

The use of thoracic ultrasound outside the radiology department and in everyday clinical practice is becoming increasingly common, having been incorporated into standards of care for many specialties. For the majority of practitioners, their experience of, and exposure to, thoracic ultrasound will be in its use as an adjunct to pleural and thoracic interventions, owing to the widely recognised benefits for patient safety and risk reduction. However, as clinicians become increasingly familiar with the capabilities of thoracic ultrasound, new directions for its use are being sought which might enhance practice and patient care. This article reviews the ways in which the advent of thoracic ultrasound is changing the approach to the investigation and treatment of respiratory disease from an interventional perspective. This will include the impact of thoracic ultrasound on areas including patient safety, diagnostic and therapeutic procedures, and outcome prediction; and will also consider potential future research and clinical directions.

Safety and Value of Thoracentesis in Medical ICU Patients

The objective of this study was to determine the safety and value of thoracentesis in an ICU, Thoracentesis is a safe procedure for critically ill patients, even those on mechanical ventilators, and usually confirms the suspected diagnosis. However, thoracentesis revealed an unexpected diagnosis that changed management in 12% of patients. Repeat or contralateral thoracentesis is indicated when either the clinical course is inconsistent or may represent a complication of the original diagnosis.

Thoracentesis

Pleural effusions are common and account for high morbidity and mortality in a range of patients. Thoracentesis can provide significant symptom relief and improvement in physiologic parameters including dyspnea, exercise, and sleep. Recent advances, including the use of ultrasound and dedicated procedural teams, have improved the safety of thoracentesis. This has allowed thoracentesis to be performed on higher-risk individuals including those with elevated bleeding risk and bilateral pleural effusions. This review will summarize recent advances in thoracentesis procedural safety, symptom relief following thoracentesis, and understanding of the physiologic basis for such improvements.

Pleural procedural complications: prevention and management

Pleural disease is common with a rising case frequency. Many of these patients will be symptomatic and require diagnostic and/or therapeutic procedures. Patients with pleural disease present to a number of different medical specialties, and an equally broad range of clinicians are therefore required to have practical knowledge of these procedures. There is often underestimation of the morbidity and mortality associated with pleural interventions, even those regarded as being relatively straightforward, with potentially significant implications for processes relating to patient safety and informed consent. The advent of thoracic ultrasound (TUS) has had a major influence on patient safety and the number of physicians with the necessary skill set to perform pleural procedures. As the variety and complexity of pleural interventions increases, there is increasing recognition that early specialist input can reduce the risk of complications and number of procedures a patient requires. This review looks at the means by which complications of pleural procedures arise, along with how they can be managed or ideally prevented.

Nontuberculous mycobacterial infection presenting as empyema and life threatening pneumothorax: A challenging situation in the emergency department

Nontuberculous mycobacterial infection in an immunocompetent young patient complicated with empyema and pneumothorax is rarely reported. A 36-year-old man presented to the emergency department with a history of worsening dyspnea and pleuritic chest pain. The patient had unstable vital signs on presentation, and was referred to the resuscitation area on a monitored bed. The patient had a chest x-ray (CXR) performed on a prior occasion at a primary health clinic, revealing pneumothorax and some fluid at the left costophrenic angle. On arrival at the hospital, bedside ultrasound was performed which confirmed the diagnosis of pneumothorax. His vital signs were pulse 153, BP 88/62, RR 50 breaths per minute and his oxygen saturation on air was 92%. Tension pneumothorax was diagnosed based on clinical presentation and given vital signs. It was managed immediately with needle decompression followed by chest tube insertion. The patient improved dramatically after needle decompression with stabilization of vital signs. A CXR was repeated post-needle decompression which showed an incompletely resolved pneumothorax with an increase in the size of the effusion. Iatrogenic haemothorax was a possible explanation for this increase in effusion size. Chest tube was successfully inserted in the fourth intercostal space just anterior to the midaxillary line under full aseptic precautions. The chest tube drained 1.4 liters of blood, which on analysis showed a low pH and elevated adenosine deaminase level. Two out of three sputum samples sent from the medical ward were positive for mycobacteria other than tuberculosis as confirmed on culture. The patient's symptoms improved with percutaneous tube drainage of hemopneumothorax and antituberculous medications.

Thoracentesis and the risks for bleeding: a new era

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Thoracentesis is a commonly performed procedure throughout the world. Convention dictates that patients should have laboratory values such as international normalized ratio (INR) and platelets corrected or medications that affect bleeding withheld prior to performing this procedure. By transfusing blood products or withholding medications, patients are exposed to risks that are different than but equally if not more significant than the risk of hemothorax from thoracentesis. This review highlights recent studies that suggest the parameters of performing thoracentesis should be less stringent than traditionally thought.

RECENT FINDINGS

Although the safety of thoracentesis has improved with the use of ultrasound and other advancements, the number of patients on new medications that exert an influence on bleeding and those who have physiologic coagulation abnormalities continues to grow. Despite a 1991 study demonstrating the safety of thoracentesis in patients with an abnormal INR or low platelet count, transfusion of blood products to normalize laboratory values is commonplace. A number of studies within the past year address the safety of thoracentesis amidst INR and platelet abnormalities and in patients taking antiplatelet or other medications that affect a patient's bleeding potential.

SUMMARY

Although large randomized studies do not exist, recent literature suggests that it is time to reevaluate the need to correct INR and platelet counts or to transfuse blood products or withhold medications prior to thoracentesis in patients felt to have a risk of possible bleeding.

Evaluation of 8.0-cm needle at the fourth anterior axillary line for needle chest decompression of tension pneumothorax

BACKGROUND

Five-centimeter needles at the second intercostal space midclavicular line (2MCL) have high failure rates for decompression of tension pneumothorax. This study evaluates 8-cm needles directed at the fourth intercostal space anterior axillary line (4AAL).

METHODS

Retrospective radiographic analysis of 100 consecutive trauma patients 18 years or older from January to September 2011. Measurements of chest wall thickness (CWT) and depth to vital structure (DVS) were obtained at 2MCL and 4AAL. 4AAL measurements were taken based on two angles: closest vital structure and perpendicular to the chest wall. Primary outcome measures were radiographic decompression (RD) (defined as CWT < 80 mm) and radiographic noninjury (RNI) (DVS > 80 mm) of 8-cm needles at 4AAL. Secondary outcome measures are effect of angle of entry on RNI at 4AAL, RD and RNI of 8-cm needles at 2MCL, and comparison of 5-cm needles with 8-cm needles at both locations.

RESULTS

Eighty-four percent of the patients were male, with mean Injury Severity Score (ISS) of 17.7 (range, 1.0-66.0) and body mass index of 26.8 (16.5-48.4). Mean CWT at 4AAL ranged from 37.6 mm to 39.9 mm, significantly thinner than mean CWT at 2MCL (43.3-46.7 mm). Eight-centimeter needle RD was more than 96% at both 4AAL and 2MCL. Five-centimeter RD ranged from 66% to 81% at all sites. Mean DVS at 4AAL ranged from 91.8 mm to 128.0 mm. RNI at all sites was more than 91% except at left 4AAL, when taken to the closest vital structure (mean DVS, 91.8 mm), with 68% RNI. Perpendicular entry increased DVS to 109.4 mm and subsequent RNI to 91%. Five-centimeter RNI at all sites was more than 99%.

CONCLUSION

CWT at 4AAL is significantly thinner than 2MCL. Based on radiographic measurements, 8-cm catheters have a higher chance of pleural decompression when compared with 5-cm catheters. Steeper angle of entry at 4AAL improves 8-cm noninjury rates to more than 91%.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic/care management study, level IV.

Complication of diagnostic pleural aspiration: is it of value in hemodialysis patients?

Pleural effusions are common in hemodialysis patients and are associated with significant morbidity. Diagnostic pleural aspiration and subsequent biochemical analysis can be used to differentiate exudates and transudates. In particular, Light's criteria have been validated in the general population although their efficacy in hemodialysis patients is unclear. Furthermore, aspiration is not without risk; we report the case of a life-threatening thoracic bleed as a complication of diagnostic thoracocentesis in a hemodialysis patient, in whom a transudative effusion was misclassified according to Light's criteria. Retrospective examination of a further 22 aspirations in hemodialysis patients suggests that biochemical analysis of pleural fluid in this group is of limited value. Careful clinical and radiological assessment may be of greater value in determining individuals who may benefit from formal drainage, rather than diagnostic aspiration with its attendant risks.

Iterative thoracentesis as first-line treatment of complicated parapneumonic effusion

Rationale

Optimal management of complicated parapneumonic effusions (CPPE) remains controversial.

Objectives

to assess safety and efficacy of iterative therapeutic thoracentesis (ITTC), the first-line treatment of CPPE in Rennes University Hospital.

Methods

Patients with CPPE were identified through our computerized database. We retrospectively studied all cases of CPPE initially managed with ITTC in our institution between 2001 and 2010. ITTC failure was defined by the need for additional treatment (i.e. surgery or percutaneous drainage), or death.

Results

Seventy-nine consecutive patients were included. The success rate was 81% (n = 64). Only 3 patients (4%) were referred to thoracic surgery. The one-year survival rate was 88%. On multivariate analysis, microorganisms observed in pleural fluid after Gram staining and first thoracentesis volume ≥450 mL were associated with ITTC failure with adjusted odds-ratios of 7.65 [95% CI, 1.44–40.67] and 6.97 [95% CI, 1.86–26.07], respectively. The main complications of ITTC were iatrogenic pneumothorax (n = 5, 6%) and vasovagal reactions (n = 3, 4%). None of the pneumothoraces required chest tube drainage, and no hemothorax or re-expansion pulmonary edema was observed.

Conclusions

Although not indicated in international recommendations, ITTC is safe and effective as first-line treatment of CPPE, with limited invasiveness.

Ultrasound-guided pleural puncture in supine or recumbent lateral position - feasibility study

Background

The aim of this study is to evaluate feasibility, safety and efficacy of accessing the pleural space with the patient supine or in lateral recumbent position, under constant ultrasonic guidance along the costophrenic sinus.

Methods

All patients with pleural effusion, referred to thoracentesis or pleural drainage from February 2010 to January 2011 in two institutions, were drained either supine or in lateral recumbent position through an echomonitored cannulation of the costophrenic sinus. The technique is described in detail and an analysis of safety and feasibility is carried out.

Results

One hundred and one thoracenteses were performed on 76 patients and 30 pigtail catheters were inserted in 30 patients (for a total of 131 pleural procedures in 106 patients enrolled). The feasibility of the procedures was 100% and in every case it was possible to follow real time needle tip passage in the pleural space.

Ninety eight thoracenteses (97%) and all catheter drainages were successfully completed. Four thoracenteses were stopped because of the appearance of complications while no pigtail drainage procedure was stopped. After 24 hour follow up, one chest pain syndrome (1.3% of completed thoracenteses) and two pneumothoraces (1.4%) occurred. The mean acquisition time of pleural space was 76 ± 9 seconds for thoracentesis and 185 ± 46 seconds for drainage insertion (p < 0.05).

Conclusions

This study highlights the safety and efficacy of this technique of real time echo-monitored pleural space puncture, that offers a more comfortable patient position, an easier approach for the operator, a very low rate of complications with short acquisition time of pleural space.

Abnormal preprocedural international normalized ratio and platelet counts are not associated with increased bleeding complications after ultrasound-guided thoracentesis

OBJECTIVE

The objective of our study was to identify differences in hemorrhagic complications after ultrasound-guided thoracentesis on the basis of patient coagulation parameters.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The records of consecutive patients who underwent ultrasound-guided thoracentesis between January 1, 2008 and April 30, 2010 were reviewed to document the international normalized ratio (INR) and platelet count obtained within 72 hours before thoracentesis and to identify bleeding complications that occurred after the procedure. The observed complication rates and 95% CIs for differences in complication rates were calculated.

RESULTS

There were 1076 procedures performed during the study period with no hemorrhagic complications identified (0% complication rate; 95% CI, 0.00-0.34%). INR values before thoracentesis were available for 822 procedures: INR exceeded 2.0 in 139 cases (17%), 2.5 in 59 cases (7%), and 3.0 in 32 cases (4%). The 95% CI for the 0% difference in complications observed between two groups of patients determined by specific INR values was -0.008 to 0.014 (INR, 1.5), -0.007 to 0.026 (INR, 2.0), -0.007 to 0.061 (INR, 2.5), and -0.009 to 0.11 (INR, 3.0). Platelet values before thoracentesis were available for 953 procedures; the platelet count was less than 100,000/μL for 148 procedures (16%), less than 50,000/μL for 58 procedures (6%), and less than 25,000/μL for 12 procedures (1%). The 95% CI for the 0% difference in complications between two groups of patients determined by a platelet count threshold of 50,000/μL was -0.007 to 0.062.

CONCLUSION

The risk of bleeding after ultrasound-guided thoracentesis performed by radiologists is low even if the preprocedural INR and platelet count are abnormal. An approach in which no coagulation testing or correction is performed before thoracentesis may be justified.

Evaluation of the risk of intercostal artery laceration during thoracentesis in elderly patients by using 3D-CT angiography

OBJECTIVE

Our study was undertaken to determine the location of the tortuous intercostal artery in elderly patients by using 3D-CT angiography in order to prevent laceration during thoracentesis.

METHODS

We evaluated the data of 3D-CT angiography of the intercostal artery in consecutive patients who had undergone contrast chest CT scan in our hospital from December 2007 to April 2008. We considered the "percent safe space" (the shortest lower rib-to-intercostal artery distance/the upper rib-to-lower rib distance) to be an index of safety that can be used to prevent laceration of the intercostal artery during thoracentesis. We measured this index at 3 points: the total site (5-10 cm lateral to the spine), the lateral site (9-10 cm lateral to the spine), and the medial site (5-6 cm lateral to the spine).

RESULTS

We evaluated 33 cases (25 males and 8 females; mean age, 74.2 years). The mean percent safe space at the total site was 58.6%. The percent safe space at the total site tended to decrease with advancing age, but the correlation was low (p=0.0378, r=-0.3631). The percent safe space at the lateral site (mean, 79.8%) was significantly higher than that at the medial site (61.2%, p<0.0001).

CONCLUSION

We showed that the intercostal artery is tortuous and does not always lie along the inferior edge of the rib and that the percent safe space at the lateral site is significantly higher than that at the medial site in elderly patients.

[Massive iatrogenic haemothorax treated by lidocaïne-adrenaline intercostal injection]

INTRODUCTION

Massive haemothorax is a relatively rare complication of thoracocentesis or the placement of tube thoracostomy. It is principally caused by intercostal vessel injury. The therapeutic approach consists in pleural drainage and sometimes thoracotomy for haemostasis.

CASE REPORT

We describe a frail 72 year old patient, who developed a massive haemothorax occurring after a tube thoracostomy placing, persisting despite second pleural drainage, and complicated by deep haemodynamic shock. He was considered to have a very high risk of mortality if surgery was undertaken. Haemorrhage was totally stopped after intercostal instillation of lidocaïne-adrenaline.

CONCLUSION

This case report suggests a role for pleural vasoconstrictor injection as initial treatment in case of persistent pleural haemorrhage caused by intercostal vessel injury.

Reducing iatrogenic risk in thoracentesis: establishing best practice via experiential training in a zero-risk environment

BACKGROUND

We studied the reasons why patients undergoing thoracenteses performed in our outpatient pulmonary clinic had a higher frequency of iatrogenic pneumothorax compared to that in the concurrent radiology practice in our institution, which utilizes ultrasound guidance. We reviewed our practice model and implemented a unique experiential training paradigm in a zero-risk simulation environment to improve efficacy, timeliness, service orientation, and safety.

METHODS

We retrospectively determined the rate of clinically significant pneumothoraces in our practice (phase I, July 1, 2001, to June 30, 2002). The training system redesign included the following: (1) a designated group of pulmonologist instructors dedicated to treating pleural disease and reducing the number of iatrogenic complications; (2) the use of ultrasound image guidance for all thoracenteses; and (3) structured proficiency and competency standards for proceduralists. Postintervention (phase II) data were prospectively collected (January 2005 to December 2006) and compared with our baseline data.

RESULTS

The baseline rate of pneumothorax was 8.6% (5 of 58 patients) in our pulmonary practice. Following intervention (phase II), the rate of pneumothorax declined to 1.1% (p = 0.0034). During phase II, the number of thoracenteses performed increased (186 vs 58 per year, respectively; p < 0.05). The iatrogenic pneumothorax rate was stable in the 2 years following intervention (2005, 0.7% [1 of 137 pneumothoraces]; 2006, 1.3% [3 of 226 pneumothoraces]; p > 0.9). Postintervention complications included procedure-related pain (n = 19), cough (n = 4), and hypotension (n = 10).

CONCLUSIONS

An improvement program that included simulation, ultrasound guidance, competency testing, and performance feedback reduced iatrogenic risk to patients. We recommend application of this process to procedural practices.

Winging of the scapula: An unusual complication of needle thoracocentesis

Needle thoracocentesis is a common interventional procedure and is generally considered to be safe. Major complications associated with this procedure are uncommon. Here we describe a rare instance of winging of the scapula following needle thoracocentesis.