Preparation of extremely obese patients for laparoscopic gastric banding by gastric-balloon therapy

A single-center experience of safety and effectiveness of adjustable intragastric balloon in patients with super obesity

BACKGROUND

The Spatz3® Intragastric Adjustable Balloon (SAB) offers a novel approach to weight loss in super obese patients [body mass index (BMI) ≥50 kg/m 2 ]. This study evaluates the safety, effectiveness, and predictors of success of SAB in this population.

METHODS

A retrospective study was conducted at King Abdullah Medical City, Makkah, Saudi Arabia, involving 94 patients with SAB implantation. Weight loss metrics (%EWL, %TBWL), complications, and predictors of adverse events were analyzed.

RESULTS

Eleven patients required early SAB removal due to severe symptoms. Complications included gastrointestinal bleeding (3.2%), gastric ulcer/erosion (27.7%), and deflation (5.3%). Significant weight loss was observed at 6 and 12 months. The mean absolute weight loss was 22.03 kg at 12 months, with %EWL of 19.27%. Early weight loss at 3 months predicted long-term success. SAB adjustments did not significantly impact outcomes. Post SAB, 57% of patients proceeded to laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) with rare postoperative complications (2.9%).

CONCLUSION

SAB is safe and effective for patients with BMI ≥50 kg/m 2 , achieving significant weight loss at 12 months. Early weight loss predicts long-term success, and subsequent LSG can be performed without significant complications. Further research should explore long-term outcomes and comparative analyses.

Intragastric Balloon as Bridging Therapy Prior to Bariatric Surgery for Patients with Severe Obesity (BMI ≥ 50 kg/m2): a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Bariatric surgery for patients with severe obesity (body mass index (BMI) ≥ 50kg/m²) is technically challenging. Intragastric balloon (IGB) has been proposed for weight loss before bariatric surgery to reduce surgical risks but its efficacy remains unclear. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of the effectiveness of IGB as bridging therapy and assess potential complications. Amongst 2419 citations, 13 studies were included. IGB resulted in a BMI reduction of 6.60 kg/m² (MD=6.60, 95% CI: 5.06-8.15; I²=72%). The total post-procedural complication rate was 8.13% (95% CI: 4.04-13.17%), with majority being balloon intolerance. Overall, IGB is effective as a bridging therapy with adequate procedural safety profile, but further study is needed to evaluate the risk reduction for bariatric surgery and long-term weight-loss outcomes.

Left renal vein compression complicating intragastric balloon insertion

Obesity is a real public health problem and is of growing concern. People are resorting to surgical or endoscopic means to fight against overweight and obesity. In recent years, there has been a marked increase in the use of these means and in particular the insertion of a gastric balloon which seems to present less risk than surgical methods. Renal complications from intragastric balloon placement are extremely rare. We report here the case of compression of the left renal vein revealed by lumbar pain and hematuria in an overweight 39-year-old woman who benefited from the balloon gastric placement one month before symptoms. The scanner made the diagnosis and showed a good evolution after the withdrawal of the balloon.

Procedures and devices for bariatric and metabolic endoscopy

Obesity is a leading cause of preventable death in developed countries, with a rising incidence over time. Lifestyle modification, pharmacotherapy, and bariatric surgery are the mainstays of bariatric therapy, even though burdened by several limitations in terms of efficacy or safety. Bariatric endoscopy has been developed in the last decades as a minimally invasive alternative, aimed to bridge the gap between conservative and interventional conventional therapies. This review aims to provide an updated overview of the bariatric and metabolic available endoscopic procedures and to drive the choice of the right procedure for the right patient.

Intragastric balloon placement in the treatment of overweight and obesity: Experience at a Mexican referral center

INTRODUCTION AND AIM

Intragastric balloon therapy is a temporary, minimally invasive method for inducing weight loss. Any balloon with a volume of 400mL induces satiety and delayed gastric emptying. The aim of the present study was to demonstrate its safety and efficacy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We analyzed the safety and effectiveness of balloon placement in relation to weight loss in 128patients. Subgroups were compared through the Student's t test, ANOVA test, and the chi-square test, depending on the type of variable and the number of groups evaluated. Statistical significance was set at a P≤.05 to evaluate weight loss.

RESULTS

Mean weight loss after balloon therapy was 10.7kg, with only 2 cases of complications due to oral feeding intolerance. Mean length of time with the balloon was 8months. There were no complications after 6months, but no further weight loss either (P=.540). Final weight loss versus initial weight loss was significant (P=.000). There was greater weight loss in the group that attended the bimonthly control appointments than in the group that did not: 12.7kg vs. 7.26kg (P=.000).

CONCLUSIONS

The rates of the adverse events of intolerance and complications were very low in our study, compared with results in the literature: 1.6% vs. 4.7% and 0% vs. 3%, respectively. Intragastric balloon placement had better results when the patients attended the control appointments. Intragastric balloon therapy is a safe and efficacious method for reducing weight in patients with overweight and obesity.

Short-term outcomes of the new intragastric balloon End-Ball® for treatment of obesity

INTRODUCTION

Intragastric balloons (IGBs) have been successfully used to treat obesity for the last 18 years. These balloons are made of different materials and filled with either air or saline. It seems that balloons filled with saline result in more effective weight loss, but are associated with worse tolerance after implantation. In contrast, balloons filled with air are associated with excellent tolerance, but result in less effective weight loss.

AIM

To report the early safety and effectiveness results of the End-Ball^® balloon and to encourage discussions on how to best use this new-generation IGB for endoscopic weight loss management.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Twenty obese patients (mean age: 40.5 years; mean body mass index: 34.8 kg/m²) were included in a 6-month study. Balloons were inflated with 300 ml of saline containing 5 ml of methylene blue and 300 cm³ of air.

RESULTS

No serious adverse events occurred during treatment. Patients experienced varying degrees of nausea, vomiting (mean: 3.7 times the first day), and abdominal pain after implantation. Six months (23-29 weeks) after End-Ball^® balloon insertion, we observed a significant decrease in body weight (13.9 ±5.1 kg) and percent excess weight loss (37.9 ±12.9%). We also found a significant decrease in the levels of glycated hemoglobin (p < 0.001), C-peptide (p < 0.002), and triacylglycerols (p < 0.001) and an increase in the concentration of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (p < 0.025).

CONCLUSIONS

The End-Ball^® IGB is a safe and effective treatment for morbid obesity, with positive effects on weight loss and saccharide metabolism.

Multicenter Randomized Study of Obesity Treatment with Minimally Invasive Injection of Hyaluronic Acid Versus and Combined with Intragastric Balloon

BACKGROUND

Research into minimally invasive techniques is worthwhile for greater acceptance in bariatric surgery, a useful first step being to evaluate the combination of these with current procedures. We suggest that intragastric balloon (IGB) can be performed with hyaluronic acid (HA) injections at the level of the gastroesophageal junction.

METHODS

A submucosal restriction is created by circular injection of an absorbable material within a defined area based on endoscopic anatomy. We included 101 patients in a prospective multicenter randomized trial, with average body mass index (BMI) 33.4 (range 27-44), treated from April 2010 to April 2012 by IGB and/or HA injection, sequentially, and followed for two more years. Patients were divided into group 1 (IGB alone), group 2 (IGB followed by HA at IGB removal, at 6 months), and group 3 (HA and IGB at 6 months).

RESULTS

BMI loss at 6 months was inferior in the HA group (32 patients) compared with the IGB groups (68 patients) (2.1 ± 0.4 versus 3.4 ± 0.3, p < 0.05). The efficacy of IGB alone compared with combined treatments (groups 2 and 3) was significantly inferior at 18 months only, but the impact of the treatment sequence (HA before or after IGB) on BMI loss was not statistically significant, although in favor of HA first.

CONCLUSIONS

This study did not demonstrate the efficacy of HA injections as an obesity treatment.

Effectiveness of intragastric balloon for obesity: A systematic review and meta-analysis based on randomized control trials

BACKGROUND

Obesity has become a worldwide epidemic, and many methods are currently used to reduce obesity. This systematic review shows the effectiveness of the intragastric balloon (IGB) method compared to the sham/diet (s/d) method.

OBJECTIVE

To demonstrate the effectiveness of the IGB method compared to the s/d method.

SETTING

Hospital das Clinicas da Universidade de São Paulo, Brazil, Public Hospital.

METHODS

After searching MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane, Lilacs, Scopus, and CINAHL, only enrolled randomized control trials comparing IGB/diet with s/d were analyzed. For qualitative analysis, 12 studies were selected, and 9 of these were acceptable for quantitative analysis.

RESULTS

The IGB/diet is more effective than s/d when comparing body mass index (BMI) loss with a mean difference of 1.1 kg/m(2) by the Student's t test and 1.41 kg/m(2) by the meta-analysis, with significant differences in both. It is also more effective in weight loss (WL), with a mean difference of 2 kg by the Student's t test and 3.55 kg by the meta-analysis. In the qualitative analysis of % excess WL (%EWL), the mean %EWL is 14.0% in favor of the IGB group compared to the s/d group by the Student's t test; however, no significant difference was found between these groups by quantitative analysis.

CONCLUSION

Based on randomized control trial data alone, IGB>400 mL is more effective than sham/diet in achieving BMI loss, WL, and %EWL.

Indications and limitations of bariatric intervention in severely obese children and adolescents with and without nonalcoholic steatohepatitis: ESPGHAN Hepatology Committee Position Statement

Morbid obesity is strongly associated with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), which is one of the most common causes of chronic liver disease worldwide. The present best treatment for NAFLD and nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) is weight reduction through lifestyle modification. Because of frustrating inefficiency of such a therapeutic approach, bariatric surgery is increasingly performed in adolescents as an alternative option for weight reduction. Standards of care and consensus for indications are, however, scarce. We explore the indications and limitations of bariatric surgery in children with severe obesity with and without NASH and aim to provide guidance for the exceptional indications for adolescents with extreme obesity with major comorbidity that may benefit from these controversial interventions. Present evidence suggests that bariatric surgery can decrease the grade of steatosis, hepatic inflammation, and fibrosis in NASH. Uncomplicated NAFLD is not an indication for bariatric surgery. Roux-en-Y gastric bypass is considered a safe and effective option for adolescents with extreme obesity, as long as an appropriate long-term follow-up is provided. Laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding has not been approved by the Food and Drug Administration for use in adolescents and therefore should be considered investigational. Finally, sleeve gastrectomy and other types of weight loss surgery that have grown increasingly common in adults, still need to be considered investigational. Temporary devices may be increasingly being used in pediatrics; however, future studies, including a long-term risk analysis of patients who undergo surgery, are much needed to clarify the exact indications for bariatric surgery in adolescents.

One-year adjustable intragastric balloons: results in 73 consecutive patients in the U.K

BACKGROUND

Most intragastric balloons have 6-month approval. We report results with the Spatz Adjustable Balloon: approved for 12 months and adjustable.

METHODS

Seventy-three patients (mean: age 45.5; weight 114.5 kg; BMI 36.6 kg/m2) scheduled for 1-year implantation with Spatz balloon (mean volume 417 ml saline). Adjustments performed for early intolerance and weight loss plateau.

RESULTS

Three patients failed insertion. There were 21 early removals (4 intolerant refusing adjustment; 3 deflations; 14 satisfied patients) leaving 49 patients at 12 months. Results of 70 patients (49 patients at 12 months and 21 patients at <12 months) were a mean 21.6 kg weight loss; 19% weight loss; and 45.7% EWL (excess weight loss). Ten intolerant patients were adjusted and lost additional mean 13.2 kg. Fifty-one patients with weight loss plateau scheduled for adjustment: adjustments failed in 6 and non-response in 7. The adjusted 38 patients lost an additional mean 9.4 kg and at extraction had mean 40.9% EWL with 18.7% weight loss. Three catheter impactions required surgical extraction, and three deflated balloons didn't migrate beyond stomach.

CONCLUSIONS

The Spatz balloon is an effective procedure without mortality; however, it carries a risk of catheter impaction necessitating surgical extraction (4.1%). The failure rate--4.1%; intolerance without ability to adjust balloon--5.5%; major complications occurred in 3 (4.1%); minor (balloon deflations) in 3 (4.1%), and 2 asymptomatic gastric ulcers at extraction (2.7%). The longer implantation period and adjustment option combine to produce greater weight loss, albeit <10% weight loss beyond the pre-adjustment weight loss.

Safety and feasibility of retrieval of intragastric balloon followed by antiobesity surgery on the same day

Intragastric balloon insertion can achieve reasonable weight loss before antiobesity surgery. Removal needs to be followed by surgery to prevent subsequent weight gain. This study aims to establish the feasibility and safety of retrieval of the intragastric balloon and sleeve gastrectomy in the same sitting. Patients who had a laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (n=9) were compared with those who had endoscopic removal of intragastric balloon followed by laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy in the same sitting (n=5). The 5 patients managed with an intragastric balloon were significantly heavier at all stages of their treatment (P=0.04). The operating time for balloon removal and concomitant sleeve gastrectomy was longer than that of sleeve gastrectomy alone (P=0.035). There were no complications in either group and postoperative hospital stay was similar. In conclusion, concomitant retrieval of an intragastric balloon followed by sleeve gastrectomy is feasible, safe, and cost effective.

Laparoscopic gastric bypass vs. sleeve gastrectomy in the super obese patient: early outcomes of an observational study

BACKGROUND

Super obesity [body mass index (BMI) > 50 kg/m2] can yield to higher morbidity/mortality in bariatric surgery, this could be related to patient's characteristics and/or surgeon's experience. In morbid obesity, both techniques proved to have a positive impact and sometimes comparable outcomes during the first 2 years. This has not been clearly analyzed in the super obese patient.

METHODS

Retrospective study comparing the records of 77 consecutive super obese patients (BMI: 50-59.9 kg/m2) submitted to either laparoscopic gastric bypass (LGBP, n = 32) or laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG, n = 45) between 2010 and 2012 at a single institution. The primary objective was to analyze baseline demographics, comorbidities, operative outcomes, and early complications (<30 days). Secondarily, weight loss [BMI and % excess weight loss (%EWL)] was also described and compared during the first year.

RESULTS

Female sex comprised 72.7 % of all cases. Both groups had comparable BMI (52.7 ± 2.1 kg/m2 for LGBP vs. 53.87 ± 2.8 kg/m2 for LSG; p = 0.087) and homogeneous baseline characteristics. Operative time was lower for the LSG group (113.1 ± 35.3 vs. 186.9 ± 39 min for LGBP; p ≤ 0.001). Overall, early complications were observed in 16.8% of patients (LGBP 9% vs. LSG 22%; p = 0.217). There were four major complications (two in each group), with two reinterventions. Weight loss (%EWL) at 6, 9, and 12 months was significantly higher in the LGBP group (51.6 ± 12.9%, 56.5 ± 13%, 63.9 ± 13.3%, respectively) than in the LSG group (40 ± 12.8%, 45.1 ± 15.5%, 43.9 ± 10.4%, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Just like in morbid obesity, LGBP and LSG are effective and safe procedures in super obese patients. LGBP had better weight loss at 1 year.

Gastric balloon to treat obesity: filled with air or fluid?

BACKGROUND

Our aim was to study the efficacy and safety of different types of intragastric balloon in morbidly obese patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

From 2005 to 2011, intragastric balloons were inserted endoscopically into 32 patients. Intragastric balloons were used in morbidly obese (body mass index [BMI] ≥ 35 kg/m(2) ) individuals who were non-responsive to 6-month medical therapy and diet. Balloons were endoscopically removed after 6 months.

RESULTS

Thirty-six balloons were inserted in a total of 32 patients. Mean age of the patients was 37.28 ± 12.08 (17-64) years and mean height was 169.81 ± 8.17 (150-185) cm. Initial mean weight was 128.87 ± 23.31 kg and BMI was 45.26 ± 8.48 kg/m(2) . At month 6, mean bodyweight was 116.93 ± 23.18 and BMI was 40.96 ± 7.96 kg/m(2) (P < 0.001, P < 0.001, respectively). At the end of 6 months, while the excessweight loss (EWL) median was 13.0 kg, [interquartile range IQR: 5.0-16.0] and percent EWL median was 21.92, [IQR: 12.72-28.49] in the Heliosphere BAG patients, the EWL median was 19.0 kg, [IQR: 14.47-26.72] and the percent EWL median was 38.26, [IQR: 19.73-47.79] in the BioEnterics Intragastric Balloon patients (P = 0.006, P = 0.010, respectively for EWL median and percent EWL median). One patient died (3.1%) of cardiac arrest due to aspiration at day 13 after BIB placement.

CONCLUSION

Although not without risk, intragastric balloon placement is an effective method for weight loss. BioEnterics Intragastric Balloon is more effective in helping weight loss than the Heliosphere BAG balloon.

Air-filled vs water-filled intragastric balloon: a prospective randomized study

BACKGROUND

The positioning of an intragastric saline-filled balloon has been developed as temporary and reversible therapeutic option for treatment of morbid obesity. Recently, an air-filled balloon was also developed. The aim of this study is to prospectively compare these two devices in terms of weight loss parameters, safety, and tolerance.

METHODS

Sixty patients were randomized into two groups: group A (Bioenterics Intragastric Balloon-BIB; n = 30; 20 F/10 M, mean age 36.7 ± 10.9; mean BMI 46.5 ± 5.9) and group B (Endobag-Heliosphere; n = 30; 20 F/10 M, mean age 37.8 ± 10.6; mean BMI 46.1 ± 5.6). All patients of both groups were sedated with midazolam (5 mg) + Propofol (2 mg/kg i.v.). The Heliosphere Bag was air-filled with 950 ml while BIB® was inflated with 500 ml of saline and 10 ml of methylene blue. Percentage of excess weight loss (%EWL) and body mass index (BMI) were evaluated. Student t test, Fisher exact test, and χ(2) test were used for statistical analysis.

RESULTS

Similar weight loss parameters were observed in patients treated with liquid or air-filled balloon at time of removal: mean BMI was 40.8 ± 6.2 and 41.9 ± 6.5(p = ns), and mean %EWL was 20 ± 12 and 18 ± 14 (p = ns) in groups A and B, respectively. Significant longer extraction time, with high patient discomfort, was observed in group B due to difficult passage through the cardia and the lower pharynx.

CONCLUSIONS

Air-filled balloon can be another valid therapeutic option in the temporary treatment of obesity, but at this time, the quality of the device must be improved to ameliorate the patient compliance at removal and avoid the spontaneous deflations.

Assessment of the knowledge of GPS considering the surgical treatment of obesity

Bariatric surgery is currently the only effective treatment option for morbidly obese patients. There has been observed a considerable disproportion between the number of procedures conducted in Poland and the number of patients requiring such treatment. There are no studies assessing bariatric knowledge among general practitioners who play crucial role in polish health care system. The aim of the study was to assess the knowledge of general practitioners regarding bariatric surgery.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

An anonymous questionnaire conducted among 282 general practitioners in 2010-2011 during local educational conferences. The questionnaire consisted of 10 questions relating to fundamental issues of bariatric surgery.

RESULTS

Only one twelfth (8.1%) of the general practitioners questioned knows the indications for bariatric surgery, can apply them, and has epidemiological awareness. 61.5% of general practitioners know the surgical procedures used for the treatment of obesity, whereas 58% of them show the knowledge of surgical technique in which they are performed. Only 23% of general practitioners were aware that bariatric surgery decreases cancer risk. 92% of the participants noticed a necessity of education regarding the surgical treatment of obesity.

CONCLUSIONS

Bariatric knowledge among general practitioners is not adequate to scientific research results published during the last years. Most general practitioners who participated in our study are aware of that and are awaiting for educational programmes focused on this issue.

Short- and long-term efficacy of intragastric air-filled balloon (Heliosphere® BAG) among obese patients

BACKGROUND

Obesity is an increasing health problem worldwide. The intragastric balloon as a temporary endoscopic treatment of obesity can play an important role among the aforementioned group of obese individuals. It can also be used as a preoperative test before subjecting patients to restrictive bariatric surgery. Furthermore, the intragastric device may be applied to patients affected by severe obesity as a "bridge treatment" before they undergo major surgery in order to reduce chances of operation-related risks. To date, there are insufficient data in the literature on the long-term results of the intragastric balloon.

METHODS

Our study includes an analysis of our experience with Heliosphere® BAG from 2006 through to 2010, concerning early weight loss and weight loss maintenance over at least 18 months since the device's removal. The 32 patients who completed the 6-month treatment had recorded a mean weight loss of 12.66 kg and a mean overweight loss of 24.37 % (SD, 12.74).

RESULTS

A total of 16 patients are subjected to an 18-month follow-up. Their pretreatment and long-term body mass index (BMI) were calculated: 6 months later, when devices were removed, they showed a mean weight of 99.75 kg (SD, 17.90; p < 0.001) and a mean weight loss of 13.62 kg and 26.14 % (SD, 12.79). 18 months after removing Heliosphere® BAG, the 16 patients' mean BMI was 37.28 kg/m² (SD, 5.41; p = 0.004), with a mean weight of 103.56 kg (SD 17.25; p = 0.0125), and a mean weight loss of 9.8 kg or 18.2 % (SD, 12.07).

CONCLUSIONS

Heliosphere® BAG enables modest short-term weight loss with little side effects, although mid/long-term follow-up may entail partial weight gain. We believe it can be considered a useful bridge treatment in bariatric surgery in order to reduce chances of preoperative risks.

Efficacy of intragastric balloon in obese Egyptian patients and the value of extended liquid diet period in mounting the weight loss

Abstract Background: The surgical management of morbid obesity is faced by several challenges. Alternative therapeutic strategies could have an important role in the perioperative risk reduction. The BioEnterics(®) intragastric balloon (BIB) (Inamed Health, Santa Barbara, CA) has been described as being effective in weight reduction and is used as a bridge before bariatric surgery. This study examined the efficacy of BIB in obese Egyptian patients and the value of the extended low caloric liquid diet program in weight loss.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

A retrospective review of a prospectively maintained bariatric database was conducted. Weight changes and complications data were analyzed. Indications for BIB placement were discussed.

RESULTS

Records of 55 patients (11 males and 44 females) were retrieved. The mean initial body mass index (BMI) was 45.3±11 kg/m(2). The mean of excess body weight percentage was 111.96±53.2%. Nausea was reported in 30 patients (54.5%). Epigastric discomfort was reported in 23 patients (41.8 %), and vomiting was reported in 27 patients (49.1%). Six patients (10.9%) had an early removal of the balloon, whereas 4 (7.2%) had delayed removal (more than 6 months). The mean excess weight loss percentage (EWL%) was 17.2%. There was significant reduction in patients' BMI from 45.3 to 38.3 kg/m(2) (P<.001). There was no significant correlation between the EWL% and the gender, age, or initial BMI. Two patients had second balloon insertions without complications. There was no significant difference in the EWL% between the 1-week liquid diet group and the extended (4-week) low caloric diet group.

CONCLUSIONS

The BIB is effective and safe in weight reduction in obese Egyptian patients. The impact of extended liquid dieting period is not significant.

Preoperative weight loss with intragastric balloon decreases the risk of significant adverse outcomes of laparoscopic gastric bypass in super-super obese patients

BACKGROUND

Extreme obesity increases morbi-mortality in bariatric surgery. We previously showed that significant weight loss can be obtained within 3 months in super-super obese patients (BMI > 60 kg/m(2)) with an intragastric balloon (IGB). Here, we explored the potential benefit of preoperative IGB on the outcome of laparoscopic gastric bypass (LGBP) in super-super obese patients.

METHODS

In this case-control study, we compared the records of 60 consecutive super-super obese patients (66.5 ± 3.4 kg/m(2)) submitted to a LGBP between 2004 and 2009, with preoperative IGB (n = 23, cases) or without (n = 37, controls). We analyzed the clinical outcome of surgery and a composite end point of significant adverse events defined as the presence of at least one of the following conditions: conversion to laparotomy, intensive care unit stay for more than 2 days, and overall hospital stay superior to 2 weeks.

RESULTS

All baseline clinical and biological characteristics were homogenous between both groups. IGB was maintained during 155 ± 62 days and induced a loss of 5.5 ± 1.3 kg/m(2) (11.2 ± 3.2% of excess body mass index) at the time of LGBP, associated with a decrease in systolic blood pressure and gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase level (p < 0.05 vs. baseline). Operative time was lower in the IGB group (146 ± 47 vs. 201 ± 81 min in controls; p < 0.01). Significant adverse events occurred less frequently after LGBP in the IGB group (2 vs. 13 in controls; p < 0.05). All patients were alive at 1 year and overall weight loss was similar in both groups (52.4 ± 17.3 vs. 50.3 ± 12.7 percent of excess BMI loss in controls; NS).

CONCLUSIONS

IGB prior to LGBP in super-super obese patients significantly reduced excess BMI. It was associated with a shorter operative time and a lower overall risk of significant adverse outcomes.

Adjustable intragastric balloons: a 12-month pilot trial in endoscopic weight loss management

Intragastric balloons are associated with (1) early period intolerance, (2) diminished effect within 3–4 months, and (3) bowel obstruction risk mandating removal at 6 months. The introduction of an adjustable balloon could improve comfort and offer greater efficacy. A migration prevention function, safely enabling prolonged implantation, could improve efficacy and weight maintenance post-extraction. The first implantations of an adjustable balloon with an attached migration prevention anchor are reported. The primary endpoint was the absence of bowel perforation, obstruction, or hemorrhage. Eighteen patients with mean BMI of 37.3 were implanted with the Spatz Adjustable Balloon system (ABS) for 12 months. Balloon volumes were adjusted for intolerance or weight loss plateau. Mean weight loss at 24 weeks was 15.6 kg with 26.4% EWL (percent of excess weight loss) and 24.4 kg with 48.8% EWL at 52 weeks. Sixteen adjustments were successfully performed. Six downward adjustments alleviated intolerance, yielding additional mean weight loss of 4.6 kg. Ten upward adjustments for weight loss plateau yielded a mean additional weight loss of 7 kg. Seven balloons were removed prematurely. Complications necessitating early removal included valve malfunction (1), gastritis (1), Mallory–Weiss tear (1), NSAID (2× dose/2 weeks) perforating ulcer (1), and balloon deflation (1). Two incidents of catheter shear from the chain: one passed uneventfully and one caused an esophageal laceration without perforation during extraction. The Spatz ABS has been successfully implanted in 18 patients. (1) Upward adjustments yielded additional weight loss. (2) Downward adjustments alleviated intolerance, with continued weight loss. (3) Preliminary 1-year implantation results are encouraging.

Superobese and super-superobese patients: 2-step laparoscopic duodenal switch

BACKGROUND

Morbidity and mortality after bariatric surgery in superobese (body mass index [BMI] >50 but <60 kg/m2) and super-superobese (BMI >60 kg/m2) patients can allegedly be reduced by performing surgery in 2 steps. We report a retrospective study gathered from a prospective database for superobese and super-superobese patients who underwent laparoscopic biliopancreatic diversion/duodenal switch (LBPD/DS) after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) as the first step.

METHODS

From October 2004 to June 2010, 31 patients underwent LBPD/DS after LSG. The mean age was 45.8 ± 10.1 years (range 21-64). The mean interval between the 2 procedures was 13.9 ± 8.4 months (range 6-37). At LSG, the mean weight and BMI was 168.8 ± 35.4 kg (range 127-255) and 58.3 ± 6.7 kg/m2 (range 50-74.5). At LBPD/DS, the mean weight, BMI, and percentage of excess weight loss was 136.3 ± 32.6 kg (range 92-220), 47.1 ± 7.2 kg/m(2) (range 37.8-64.3), and 31.6% ± 12.2% (range -11.7 to +54.6). At LSG, 26 patients had 43 obesity co-morbidities. Three co-morbidities (6.9%) resolved in 3 patients before the second step of LBPD/DS was performed.

RESULTS

The mean operative time was 175.5 ± 60.6 minutes (range 75-285). There were no deaths or conversions to open surgery. Four patients had early complications (1 anastomotic leak, 1 small bowel perforation, 1 case of renal insufficiency, and 1 case of pneumonia). The mean hospital stay was 6.6 ± 8 days (range 3-35). All patients, with the exception of 3, were followed up for a mean of 28.8 ± 21.4 months (range 4-71). At follow-up, the mean weight, BMI, and percentage of excess weight loss (compared with the pre-LSG weight) was 99.4 ± 23.7 kg (range 62-150), 34.5 ± 5.8 kg/m2 (range 24.9-46.3), and 54.8% ± 16% (range 18.9-84.8). A total of 22 obesity co-morbidities (51.1%) resolved in 14 patients. Three patients presented with late complications (1 ventral hernia, 1 case of protein deficiency, 1 anastomotic stenosis).

CONCLUSION

In the treatment of superobese and super-superobese patients with 2-step LBPD/DS, we experienced no deaths and achieved acceptable morbidity, considering the high operative risk in this group. This procedure is effective for both weight loss and resolution of co-morbidities.

Intragastric balloon positioning and removal: sedation or general anesthesia?

BACKGROUND

Different anesthesiological techniques are currently used for intragastric balloon positioning and removal. The aim of this study is to compare different anesthesiological approaches for balloon positioning and removal in a large multicentric patient population.

METHODS

Retrospective multicenter study was conducted. From May 2000 to April 2008, 3,824 patients underwent BIB(®) placement [1,022 male/2,802 female; mean age 39.5 ± 14.7 years, range 12-71 years; mean body mass index (BMI) 44.8 ± 9.7 kg/m(2), range 28.0-79.1 kg/m(2); excess weight (EW) 59.1 ± 29.8 kg, range 16-210 kg; %EW 89.3 ± 31.7, range 21.4-262]. Patients were allocated to three groups according to anesthesiological technique used: conscious sedation (group A), deep sedation (group B), and general anesthesia (group C). Intragastric balloon was placed after diagnostic endoscopy and removed after 6 months. Both positioning and removal were done under different protocols. Conscious sedation was obtained with topical lidocaine spray, adding diazepam (0.05-0.1 mg/kg iv) or midazolam (0.03-0.05 mg/kg iv). Deep sedation was obtained with propofol alone or adding other drugs such as midazolam, meperidine/fentanyl or meperidine/fentanyl + midazolam. General anesthesia was obtained with midazolam premedication (0.01-0.02 mg/kg iv) followed by induction with propofol (1-1.5 mg/kg iv) + Norcuron (80 mcg/kg iv) + fentanyl (0.5-1 mcg/kg iv), and maintenance with propofol (50-150 μg/kg/min) or sevorane. Oxygen saturation, hemodynamic stability, major anesthesiological complications and related mortality, patient satisfaction, time to return to autonomous walking, duration of procedure, and hospital stay were considered.

RESULTS

Sedation-related mortality was absent. A significant number of patients with bronchoinhalation during balloon removal was observed with general anesthesia (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

BIB positioning and removal should be performed under conscious sedation for patient safety and comfort, and technical success.

Time-course of changes of visceral fat area, liver volume and liver fat area during intragastric balloon therapy in Japanese super-obese patients

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to assess the changes in the clinical parameters during intragastric balloon therapy for Japanese obese patients.

METHODS

Between March 2009 and September 2010, 8 patients underwent intragastric balloon therapy at our hospital. The visceral fat area, liver volume and the liver-spleen ratio were measured by computed tomography. Blood examination and computerized tomography were performed before the balloon placement, and at 1, 3 and 6 months after the balloon placement in all of the patients.

RESULTS

Eight patients (5 males and 3 females, median age, 39 years; median BMI, 44.0 kg/m(2)) underwent intragastric balloon therapy without severe complications. The median weight loss was 8.6 kg, mean BMI loss was 2.8 kg/m(2), and the percent excess weight loss was 14.8% at 6 months after the balloon placement. The body weight and liver volume decreased significantly during the first month, and the results were maintained at the same levels until after the second month. The liver-spleen ratio also improved significantly during the first month, but worsened again during the last 3 months. The visceral fat area showed no significant differences during the treatment as well as no differences in liver enzymes, glucose and lipid metabolism.

CONCLUSION

Intragastric balloon therapy achieved a moderate effect in weight and liver volume reduction during the early months of the treatment. Intragastric balloon therapy may have a role as a minimally invasive method for pretreatment before laparoscopic surgery.

BioEnterics® intragastric balloon (BIB®). Single ambulatory center Spanish experience with 714 consecutive patients treated with one or two consecutive balloons

BACKGROUND

The BioEnterics® Intragastric Balloon (BIB®) is a well-established device for temporary treatment in morbidly obese patients. The aim of this study is the evaluation, in a population of 714 consecutive outpatient setting cases, BIB® results in terms of weight loss and comorbidity change.

METHODS

BIB® was positioned in all cases after diagnostic endoscopy. The device was inflated under direct endoscopic vision with saline solution (600-700 ml) and methylene blue (10 ml). Intubation was carried out in patients with body mass index (BMI) > 40 kg/m(2) affected by sleep apnea or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. After 6 months, balloon removal was carried out, and patients were discharged with drug therapy and 1,000 kcal diet. More than 100 patients underwent a second consecutive balloon positioning. One month from the removal of the first BIB, patients were given a second BIB. Patients were followed up weekly. Mortality, complications and their treatment, postplacement symptoms, comorbidities, BMI, percentage of excess BMI loss (%EBL), and percentage of excess weight loss (%EWL) were considered. Data are expressed as mean ± standard deviation.

RESULTS

From June 1, 2005, to May 31, 2007, 714 patients underwent BIB® placement (143 males/571 females; mean age, 38.4 ± 16.1; mean BMI, 37.6 ± 5.7 kg/m(2); mean EW, 56.3 ± 27.1 kg). After 6 months, mean BMI was 31.1 ± 7.2, mean %EWL was 41.6 ± 21.8, mean BMI loss was 6.5 ± 12.7, and mean %EBL was 44.5 ± 22.6. Of 714 patients, 112 underwent a second BIB placement. At the time of the second balloon placement, mean BMI was 32.9 ± 6.7 kg/m(2); range was 31-51. After the second balloon removal, mean BMI was 30.3 ± 7.2.

CONCLUSIONS

BIB® treatment is a safe and effective procedure for weight reduction, without mortality and with very low morbidity rates even in nonhospitalized patients. A second balloon can also be positioned without difficulties, achieving good results after 12 months of treatment.

Analysis of safety and efficacy of intragastric balloon in extremely obese patients

BACKGROUND

The implantation of an intragastric balloon constitutes a short-term effective non-surgical intervention to lose weight. The aim of this study was to evaluate retrospectively the clinical outcome and safety of gastric balloon therapy (GBT) in extremely obese patients.

METHODS

One hundred and nine super- and super-super-obese patients, 64 males and 45 females, mean age 39.1+/-8.4 years, mean body mass index (BMI) 68.8+/-8.9 kg/m2, who underwent GBT for weight loss, were studied retrospectively. GBT was assessed in massively obese patients concerning tolerance, weight loss, number of comorbidities and complications.

RESULTS

A significant reduction in patients' weight and BMI was evident after GBT. Regarding safety, no major complications occurred. Minor complications at balloon placement and removal occurred in one (0.9%) and three patients (2.8%) respectively. Mean duration of GBT was 177.6+/-56.8 days. After GBT, the mean weight loss was 26.3+/-15.2 kg (p<0.001) and the mean BMI reduction was 8.7+/-5.1 kg/m2 (p<0.001) representing a mean percentage of excess BMI lost (%EBL) of 19.7+/-10.2. The highest BMI loss was observed in patients with BMI>80 kg/m2. A noteworthy improvement of comorbidities in 56.8% of the patients was also noted. Of the 109 patients, 69 received subsequent bariatric surgery. All the procedures were performed laparoscopically. Ten patients, with a mean BMI of 68.6+/-10.6 kg/m2 after the removal of the first BIB, received a second BIB resulting in a non-significant weight and BMI loss of 6.3+/-9.4 kg and 1.8+/-2.9 kg/m2, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study indicates the safety and efficacy of GBT in extremely obese patients particularly as a first step before a definitive anti-obesity operation. GBT appears to be a safe, tolerable, and potentially effective procedure for the initial treatment of morbid obesity.

Preoperative weight reduction using the intragastric balloon

BACKGROUND

Gastric balloon therapy (GBT) is a temporary, nonsurgical treatment for obesity. This retrospective study evaluates safety and efficacy of GBT in obese patients.

METHODS

The BioEnterics. Intragastric Balloon (BIB) was endoscopically implanted into each patient's stomach and inflated with saline (450-750 ml). Extraction was planned after 6 months. Data from 190 patients receiving GBT were evaluated. Mean weight was 168.4 +/- 58.9 kg (range 76.5-310.0) and mean BMI was 55.6 +/- 17.5 kg/m2 (range 27.0-95.7).

RESULTS

Mean weight loss at the time of balloon removal was 21.2 +/- 14.0 kg (range 0-80.0). The mean BMI loss and EBL(Excess BMI Loss) were 7.2 +/- 4.9 kg/m2 (range 0-28.9) and 30.1 +/- 26.4% (0-184.4), respectively. The most substantial weight and BMI loss was observed in the most massively obese patients. Minor complications at implantation were encountered in 2 cases (1.1%) due to leakage of the balloon, and in 3 cases at explantation (1.6%). No mortality or major complications such as gastric perforation or ulcers occurred. Of the 190 patients, 76 received subsequent surgery (40.0%). Of those, 7 patients had a BMI < 50 kg/m2 while all other patients where super-obese (BMI > 50 kg/m2). 58 patients (30.5%) with a BMI > 60 kg/m2 which had an extraordinary high operation risk were able to receive subsequent surgical treatment because of a substantial weight loss and/or reduced comorbidity.

CONCLUSION

GBT appears to be a safe, tolerable, and potentially effective procedure for the initial treatment of morbid obesity.

[The gastric balloon--a retrospective cohort analysis of 634 patients]

HINTERGRUND

Der temporÄre Einsatz eines Magenballons zur Behandlung der Adipositas Grad1 und 2 nimmt weltweit zu; bei der Adipositas Grad 3 wird der Magenballon als adjuvantes Hilfsmittel zur prÄoperativen Gewichtsreduktion implantiert. Ziel dieser retrospektiven Kohorten analyse ist, die Wirksamkeit des Magenballons auf Gewichtsreduzierung und das Risikoprofil der Methode zu evaluieren.

METHODEN

Retrospektive Kohortenanalysen aus 4 Adipositas-Zentren, in denen der Magenballon seit 2001 regelmÄßig implantiert wurde.

ERGEBNISSE

Von Februar2001 bis April 2008 wurde bei 634 Patienten ein Magenballon implantiert (BIBTM Intragastric Balloon System; Allergan Medical, Irvine, CA, USA). Die Geschlechterverteilung war 31,5% MÄnnerzu 68,5% Frauen; das Durchschnittsalter betrug 41,5 Jahre. Das durchschnittliche Ausgangsgewicht lag bei 126 kg. Der initiale BMI bei Implantation des Magenballons war 42,5 kg/m². Die Implantation der Prothese war in allen FÄllen unkompliziert. Der durchschnittliche Gewichtsverlust lag bei 20,75 kg bzw. 7,05 BMI-Punkten.

SUMMARY

The Gastric Balloon — a Retrospective Cohort Analysis with 634 Patients

BACKGROUND

The temporary use of a gastric balloon for the treatment of obesity grade 1 and 2 is increasing worldwide, whereas in grade 3 obesity, it is implanted as a tool for preoperative adjuvant weight loss. The aim of this retrospective cohort analysis is to evaluate the effectiveness of weight reduction and to describe the risk profile of the method.

METHODS

Retrospective cohort analysis of 4 obesity centers where gastric balloons had been regularly implanted since 2001.

RESULTS

Between February 2001 and April 2008, the gastric balloon (BIBTM Intragastric Balloon System; Allergan Medical, Irvine, CA, USA) was implanted in 634 patients. The gender ratio was 31.5% males to 68.5% females; the average age was 41.5 years. The average initial weight was 126 kg. The initial BMI at implantation of the gastric balloon was 42.5 kg/m2. The implantation of the prosthesis was uncomplicated in all cases. Average weight loss was 20.75 kg or 7.05 BMI points, respectively.

Assessment of the application of the intragastric balloon together with sibutramine: a prospective clinical study

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study is the prospective evaluation of the results of Bioenterics intragastric balloon (BIB) with sibutramine and BIB placement alone in the treatment of obesity.

METHODS

The patients evaluated between March 2006 and January 2007 and enrolled in this study were assessed in two groups as group A (BIB + sibutramine) and group B (BIB). After the follow-up of the patients for 6 months, body mass index (BMI), weight loss, excess weight loss (EWL%), and excess body mass index loss (EBMIL%) values of the patients in both groups were compared.

RESULTS

According to the comparison of the weights of the patients in groups A and B at 6 months with the beginning weights of the patients in both groups, there was statistically significant weight loss (p < 0.01). The total weight loss at 6 months in group A was statistically significantly higher than that in group B (p < 0.05). The patients in group A had a mean BMI 34.53 +/- 6.63 kg/m(2), EWL% 38.77 +/- 11.88%, EBMIL% 49.93 +/- 21.52% after 6 months; the patients in group B had a mean BMI 35.29 +/- 6.36 kg/m(2), EWL% 29.06 +/- 17.82%, EBMIL% 36.51 +/- 23.69% after 6 months. There was no statistically significant difference between group A and group B according to the BMI, EWL%, and EBMIL% values (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

In the management of obesity, using BIB together with sibutramine before the treatment in the patient group who are planned to have surgery, compared with using only BIB, provides more effective weight loss.

Evidence-based review of the Bioenterics intragastric balloon for weight loss

We reviewed clinical studies performed with the Bioenterics intragastric balloon (BIB) to promote weight loss. Thirty studies were included [18 prospective (5 randomized), 12 retrospective], totaling 4,877 patients. Only one of three sham-controlled trials found a significantly higher weight loss with the BIB vs the sham procedure plus exhaustive follow-up. In nonrandomized studies, weight loss with the BIB averaged 17.8 kg (range, 4.9-28.5), corresponding to BMI changes of 4.0-9.0 kg/m(2). Comorbidities resolved or improved in 52-100% of patients. Best short-term results were observed in patients devoid of binge eating disorder with a BMI in the 30.0-40.0 kg/m(2) range; the BIB also helped to prepare superobese patients for bariatric surgery. Severe complications were exceptional (gastric perforation and intestinal obstruction; 0.2% each); digestive intolerance prompted early BIB removal in 2.5% of patients. Long-term (>or=2 years) results are awaited, as well as well-designed studies to define the best indications for this therapy.

Intragastric balloon or diet alone? A retrospective evaluation

BACKGROUND

Very few studies have reported results of the BioEnterics Intragastric Balloon (BIB) at > or =12 months follow-up. The aim of this study is the retrospective evaluation of the results of BIB placement compared to diet regimen alone.

METHODS

From January 2005 to June 2006, 130 outpatients underwent a structured diet plan with simple behavioral modification at our institutions. Controls (n = 130) were selected from the charts of patients who, during the same period, underwent BIB treatment. Patients in the outpatient group were given a structured balanced diet with a caloric intake between 1,000 and 1,200. The approximate macronutrient distribution, according the "Mediterranean diet," was 25% protein (at least 60 g/day), 20-25% lipids, and 50-55% carbohydrates. In the BIB group, patients received generic counseling for eating behavior. In both groups, we considered weight loss parameters (kilograms, percentage of excess weight loss [%EWL], body mass index [BMI], percentage of excess BMI loss [%EBL]) at 6 and 24 months from baseline and comorbidities at baseline and after 24 months. Results are expressed as mean+/-standard deviation. Statistical analysis was done by Student's t-test and chi (2)-test or Fisher's exact test. p < .05 was considered significant.

RESULTS

At the time of BIB removal (6 months), significantly better results in terms of weight loss in kilograms (16.7 +/- 4.7 vs. 6.6 +/- 2.6; p < 0.01), BMI (35.4 +/- 11.2 vs. 38.9 +/- 12.1; p < 0.01), %EBL (38.5 +/- 16.1 Vs 18.6 +/- 14.3; p < 0.01), and %EWL (33.9 +/- 18 vs. 24.3 +/- 17.0; p < 0.01) were observed in patients treated by intragastric balloon as compared to diet-treated patients. At 24 months from baseline, patient dropout was 1/130 (0.7%) and 25/130 (19.2%) in the BIB and diet groups, respectively (p < 0.001). At this time, patients treated with intragastric balloon have tended to regain weight, whereas diet-treated patients have already regained most of lost weight.

CONCLUSIONS

Although the strength of this study may be limited by its retrospective design, the results indicate that, in the short-to-medium term, BIB is significantly superior to diet in terms of weight loss.

Safety and effectiveness of the intragastric balloon for obesity. A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Intragastric balloons have been used since 1985 to treat obesity, but an evidence-based systematic review had not been previously performed. The objective of this study is to determine the safety, efficacy, and effectiveness of the most widely used balloon, BioEnterics Intragastric Balloon (BIB), to treat obesity.

METHODS

Systematic literature review of Medline, Embase, and other information sources from inception to March 2006. The quality of selected studies was assessed. Meta-analysis of weighted mean difference was made using the inverse variance method.

RESULTS

We pooled 15 articles (3,608 patients) to estimate BIBs effectiveness. The estimates for weight lost at balloon removal for BIB were the following: 14.7 kg, 12.2% of initial weight, 5.7 kg/m(2), and 32.1% of excess weight. However, data were scant after balloon removal. Yet, efficacy at balloon removal was estimated with a meta-analysis of two randomized controlled trials (75 patients) that compared balloon versus placebo, indicating the balloon group lost more weight than the placebo group. These differences in weight lost were 6.7 kg, 1.5% of initial weight, 3.2 kg/m(2), and 17.6% of excess weight. Regarding BIB safety, the majority of complications were mild and the early removal rate was 4.2%.

CONCLUSION

The use of the BIB, within a multidisciplinary weight management program, is a short-term effective treatment to lose weight, but it is not yet possible to verify its capacity to maintain the weight lost over a long period of time.

Intragastric balloon treatment for obesity: what does it really offer?

Obesity is a chronic metabolic disorder with considerable health risks, which can be approved by a sustained modest weight loss. This can be achieved by medical treatment through behavioral therapy, diet, exercise and pharmacotherapy. Surgery is often needed for the severely obese. Intragastric balloon treatment stands in between, being more drastic than medical treatment but less invasive than surgery. In the light of the high premature deflation rate and the high incidence of gastric ulcers, a safer balloon had to be awaited, constructed according to predefined criteria. This new balloon (BioEnterics Intragastric Balloon) promoted a weight loss of 5-9 BMI units in 6 months with an impressive improvement of obesity-associated comorbidities. A weight regain of 25-40% has to be considered in a 1-year balloon-free follow-up period. A failure rate of 15% was observed in studies that defined a successful weight loss. With respect to safety, there was no mortality. Gastrointestinal complications, mainly consisting of esophagitis, were present in 5.5%. Intolerance of the balloon resulted in its removal in 7%. Balloons deflated in 8% with an uneventful outcome in all except 5 patients, who had to be operated. Balloon treatment is a valuable method, but nonresponse, intolerance and weight regain have to be taken into account.

Present and future therapeutic strategies in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease

Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is found in individuals who do not drink or abuse alcohol and represents a significant health burden for the general community. NAFLD is often associated with one or more features of the metabolic syndrome and has potential for evolution towards non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), the necro-inflammatory form of liver steatosis. The most worrisome evolutive events in a subgroup of NASH patients include advanced liver fibrosis, cirrhosis, and hepatocellular carcinoma. Pathophysiology of NAFLD/NASH is complex, but studies point to a pre-eminent role of oxidative stress and lipid peroxidation in the liver, including early mitochondrial dysfunction. Changes follow an insulin resistance status with a background of a chronic pro-inflammatory status due to an excess of visceral adiposity. Although no established therapy exists for NAFLD/NASH, potential therapeutic approaches are discussed in this review.

Safety of the Ullorex oral intragastric balloon for the treatment of obesity

BACKGROUND

Intragastric balloons have been used for weight loss with varying success. Widespread use of intragastric balloons has been limited because balloons must be placed in, and removed from, the stomach endoscopically. Development of a balloon that does not require endoscopy suggests that obesity treatment with intragastric balloons is feasible. The purpose of this study was to test the Ullorex oral intragastric balloon (OIB) in a sample of human participants.

METHODS

The Ullorex OIB is a large capsule that is injected with citric acid and swallowed. After 4 minutes, the balloon inflates to 300 cm(3). Stomach acid degrades a plug on the balloon over 25-30 days, when the balloon deflates and passes in feces. The Ullorex OIB was tested in 12 humans (two participants received placebo capsules). Body weight was monitored before and after balloon placement, and test meals quantified food intake among 6 of the 12 participants, all of whom received one balloon.

RESULTS

A single significant adverse event occurred. The one participant randomized to receive three balloons developed nausea and vomiting, requiring intravenous fluids, which was likely influenced by noncompliance (eating solid foods after balloon placement). Participants who received balloons had a significant mean weight loss over 2 weeks, amounting to 1.5 kg (p < 0.05). A marginally significant food intake reduction from baseline to week 1 was found (149 kcal, 24.4%) (p = 0.055).

CONCLUSIONS

The Ullorex OIB was successfully utilized in this study, with one serious adverse event that was likely influenced by noncompliance. Body weight and food intake data suggest that the Ullorex OIB be tested further as a possible treatment for obesity.

Intragastric balloon reduces liver volume in super-obese patients, facilitating subsequent laparoscopic gastric bypass

BACKGROUND

Surgery in patients with super-obesity (BMI > or = 50) involves technical difficulties that are related, among other factors, to increased liver volume. Although the intragastric balloon is not a definitive alternative to surgery, it has been used in these patients as a primary therapeutic means of reducing excess weight and the risks of subsequent surgery. It has also been reported to considerably diminish liver volume to facilitate technical aspects of the operation. We evaluated preoperative weight loss in patients with super-obesity after placement of an intragastric balloon and its effect on liver volume measured by computed axial tomography (CT) prior to laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGBP).

METHODS

The balloon was implanted preoperatively under endoscopic guidance and sedation in 31 patients with super-obesity, to reduce weight prior to LRYGBP. Two patients were excluded from the study for intolerance and the balloon was removed 2 weeks after placement. Measurement of liver volume was done with axial images obtained by spiral CT with a section thickness of 10 mm, reconstitution index 10 mm, pitch 1.5 and acquisition delay 60 seconds. Volumes were calculated using the sum of areas technique. Measurement of volume was done in these 29 patients prior to balloon placement and the week before surgery.

RESULTS

After placement of the balloon, 27 patients (93%) had nausea and 25 patients (86%) had vomiting, which abated 1 week after placement. Mean liver volume prior to balloon placement was 2938.53 +/- 853.1 cm3, which at 6 weeks dropped to values of 1918.2 +/- 499.8 cm3, revealing a considerable reduction in liver volume [31.8% +/- 18.16% (range 3.1%-58.5%)]. Percent of excess weight loss was 22.14% +/- 7.39. LRYGBP was performed at 6 months.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with super-obesity, preoperative treatment with intragastric balloon considerably reduces liver volume to facilitate LRYGBP.

Green urine after surgical treatment of pressure ulcer

We describe a 58-year-old man who developed green urine after operation on a pressure ulcer. The discolouration disappeared gradually after two days. We think that the use of methylene blue dye during the revision of the wounds and the use of the sedative propofol could have caused it.

Intragastric Balloon-Induced Satiety is Not Mediated by Modification in Fasting or Postprandial Plasma Ghrelin Levels in Morbid Obesity

BACKGROUND

The BioEnterics Intragastric Balloon (BIB) has been proposed as an adjuvant therapy for the short-term treatment of obesity. The temporal pattern of BIB-induced satiety and whether this effect is mediated by modification of ghrelin levels is unknown.

METHODS

Patients with treatment-resistant morbid obesity were invited to participate in a randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled trial of 4-month duration. Anthropometric and biochemical parameters, estimation of energy intake, and pre- and postprandial evaluation of satiety were required monthly. Ghrelin response after a standard mixed meal was scheduled prior to and 4 weeks after the endoscopic procedure.

RESULTS

21 out of 22 enrolled patients completed the study (17 women, 5 men; 35.9 +/- 9.9 years; BMI 50.4 +/- 7.8 kg/m2). Pre-intervention weight decreased from 143.8 +/- 31.2 kg to 131.1 +/- 32.6 kg in Group Balloon (P < 0.001) and from 138.8 +/- 24.5 kg to 129.9 +/- 25.6 kg in Group Sham (P < 0.01) at the end of the study. Weight loss was not significantly different in Group Balloon and Group Sham at any time-point of the follow-up. Only patients from Group Balloon showed a temporary increased pre- and postprandial satiety, which was maximal at 4 weeks after the intervention. Total area under the curve, fasting and postprandial plasma ghrelin were not significantly different between groups at inclusion or 4 weeks after follow-up. No correlation was found between any of the satiety scores at any time-point with their comparable ghrelin levels.

CONCLUSION

BIB induces a temporary sense of satiety in morbidly obese patients which is not mediated by modification of fasting or postprandial levels of plasma ghrelin.

New technique for endoscopic removal of intragastric balloon placed for treatment of morbid obesity

BACKGROUND

Placement and removal of the intragastric balloon for obesity are performed endoscopically often under general anesthesia. We propose a safer and faster technique for endoscopic removal of the intragastric balloon using standard sedation.

METHODS

In 87 obese patients, we performed 3 removal techniques: 1) standard gastroscope and foreign body forceps, 2) standard gastroscope and retrieval snare, 3) double-channel gastroscope and foreign body forceps plus symmetrical "shark model" polypectomy snare. Balloon retrieval time, number of times the grasping devices lost the balloon, amount of antispasmodic drug, symptoms cumulative score and VAS score for discomfort were evaluated.

RESULTS

The technique by double-channel gastroscope and foreign body forceps plus symmetrical polypectomy shark retrieval snare showed a significantly lower balloon retrieval time, number of lost balloons, total number of ampoules used, symptoms cumulative score and VAS score compared to the other two techniques (Dunn's P<0.05). Number of lost balloons was positively associated with number of antispasmodic ampoules used, balloon retrieval time and VAS score.

CONCLUSIONS

Technique by double-channel gastroscope and foreign body forceps plus symmetrical polypectomy shark retrieval snare, allows balloon removal safely, quickly and easily, avoiding loss of the balloon, with good patient endurance.

Intragastric balloon for high-risk super-obese patients: a prospective analysis of efficacy

BACKGROUND

Super-obese patients with many co-morbidities present a challenge in bariatric surgery because of the high perioperative morbidity and mortality. The BioEnterics intragastric balloon (BIB) is an endoscopic device used preoperatively to induce weight loss to reduce the risk of surgery for morbid obesity.

METHODS

From November 2003 to April 2006, the BIB was endoscopically placed in 26 high-risk super-obese patients with a mean body mass index of 65.3 +/- 9.8 kg/m(2) and severe co-morbidities (mean 4.33 +/- 1.12, range 3-7). The BIB was endoscopically removed 6 months later, at which time the patients were evaluated in terms of weight loss and improvement of co-morbid conditions.

RESULTS

BIB placement was uneventful in all patients. The major side effect related to the procedure was occasional vomiting during the first 2 days (65%). One patient died (3.8%) of cardiac arrest after aspiration on the first postinsertion day as a direct result of BIB placement. The mean weight loss was 28.5 +/- 19.6 kg, and clinical re-evaluation revealed significant improvement in patient co-morbidity status (mean 2.23 +/- .7, range 1-3; P = .024). Twenty patients underwent a primary bariatric surgical procedure the day after BIB removal; 2 patients were rejected for surgery because of inadequate weight loss.

CONCLUSIONS

BIB placement can be considered an effective first-stage treatment of high-risk super-obese patients in need of surgical intervention. Although not without risk, it is generally a simple procedure leading to satisfactory weight loss, improvement in co-morbidities, and consequent reduction of the perioperative mortality and morbidity rates associated with surgery.

Intragastric balloon for obesity

BACKGROUND

Obesity is one of the major public health problems of modern society. Intragastric balloon (IGB) treatment for obesity has been developed as a temporary aid. Its primary objective is the treatment of obese people, who have had unsatisfactory results in their clinical treatment for obesity, despite of being cared for by a multidisciplinary team, and super obese patients with a higher surgical risk. However, the effects of different IGB procedures compared with conventional treatments and with each other are uncertain.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effects of intragastric balloon in people with obesity.

SEARCH STRATEGY

Studies were obtained from computerised searches of MEDLINE, EMBASE, LILACS, The Cochrane Library and other electronic databases. Furthermore, reference lists of relevant articles and hand searches of selected journals were performed. Experts in the field were contacted.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised and quasi-randomised controlled trials fulfilling the inclusion criteria were used. Short term weight loss is common, so studies were included if they reported measurements after a minimum of four weeks follow-up.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Data were extracted by one reviewer and checked independently by two reviewers. Two reviewers independently assessed the quality of trials.

MAIN RESULTS

Nine randomised controlled trials involving 395 patients were included. Six out of nine studies had a follow-up of less than one year, the longest study duration was 24 months. Only a third of the analysed studies revealed a low risk of bias. No information was available on quality of life, all-cause mortality and morbidity. Compared with conventional management, IGB did not show convincing evidence of a greater weight loss. On the other hand, complications of intragastric balloon placement occurred, however few of a serious nature. The relative risks for minor complications like gastric ulcers and erosions were significantly raised.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Evidence from this review is limited for decision making, since there was large heterogeneity in IGB trials, regarding both methodological and clinical aspects. However, a co-adjuvant factor described by some authors in the loss and maintenance of weight has been the motivation and the encouragement to changing eating habits following a well-organized diet and a program of behavioural modification. The IGB alone and the technique of positioning appear to be safe. Despite the evidence for little additional benefit of the intragastric balloon in the loss of weight, its cost should be considered against a program of eating and behavioural modification.

Six months of balloon treatment does not predict the success of gastric banding

BACKGROUND

We studied whether weight loss by intragastric balloon would predict the outcome of subsequent gastric banding with regard to weight loss and BMI reduction.

METHODS

A prospective cohort of patients with a body mass index (BMI)>40 kg/m(2) received an intragastric balloon for 6 months followed by laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB). Successful balloon-induced weight loss was defined as > or =10% weight loss after 6 months. Successful surgical weight loss was defined as an additional 15% weight loss in the following 12 months. Patients were divided in group A, losing > or =10% of their initial weight with 6 months' balloon treatment, and group B, losing <10% of their initial weight.

RESULTS

In 40 patients (32 female, 8 male; age 36.6 yr, range 26-54), the mean BMI decreased from 46.5 to 40.5 kg/m(2) (P<0.001) after 6 months of balloon treatment and to 35.2 kg/m(2) (P<0.001) 12 months after LAGB. Group A (25 patients) and group B (15 patients) had a significant difference in BMI decrease, 12.4 vs 9.0 kg/m(2) (P<0.05), after the total study duration of 18 months. However, there was no difference in BMI reduction (4.7 kg/m(2) vs 5.8 kg/m(2)) in the 12 months after LAGB. 6 patients in group A lost > or =10% of their starting weight during 6 months balloon treatment as well as > or =15% 12 months following LAGB. 6 patients in group B lost <10% of their starting weight after 6 months of BIB, but also lost > or =15% 12 months following LAGB.

CONCLUSION

Intragastric balloon did not predict the success of subsequent LAGB.

New applications for endoscopy: the emerging field of endoluminal and transgastric bariatric surgery

Endoluminal and transgastric procedures are evolving concepts that combine the skills and techniques of flexible endoscopy with minimally invasive surgery. Precisely how this technology and skill set will be applied in the field of general surgery is not yet known, but the treatment of obesity with an endoluminal or transgastric procedure holds great promise. As the demand for bariatric surgery increases, efforts will be directed toward developing less morbid and less costly treatment options that can provide substantial weight loss and resolution of comorbid conditions. Natural orifice bariatric procedures may include short-term weight loss in preparation for a definitive laparoscopic procedure, revisional procedures to reduce stoma or pouch size or repair fistulas, or primary therapy that provides durable weight loss. The latter application will undoubtedly appeal to patients and referring physicians if it can be performed as an outpatient procedure with significantly less morbidity than a laparoscopic procedure. Early preclinical and clinical work has been published in this area, but many technical obstacles must be overcome before a primary endoluminal or transgastric bariatric procedure can be offered. This article reviews the endoluminal and transgastric technology currently available, the endoluminal procedures currently performed, and the future of these technologies with respect to bariatric surgery.

BioEnterics Intragastric Balloon (BIB): a short-term, double-blind, randomised, controlled, crossover study on weight reduction in morbidly obese patients

BACKGROUND

The BioEnterics Intragastric Balloon (BIB) System in association with restricted diet has been used for the short-term treatment of morbid obesity. Aim of this study was to evaluate the real, short term, efficacy of the BIB for weight reduction in morbidly obese patients by using a prospective, double-blind, randomised, sham-controlled, crossover study.

METHODS

Patients were recruited from January 2003 to December 2003. After selection, they were randomly allocated into two groups: BIB followed by sham procedure after 3 months (Group A), and sham procedure followed by BIB after 3 months (Group B). All endoscopic procedures were performed under unconscious intravenous sedation. The BioEnterics Intragastric Balloon (Inamed Health; Santa Barbara, CA, USA) was filled by using saline (500 ml) and methylene blue (10 ml). Patients were discharged with omeprazole therapy and diet (1000 kcal). Patients were followed up weekly by a physician blinded to randomisation. In both groups mortality, complications, BMI, BMI reduction and %EWL were considered. Data were expressed as mean +/- s.d., except as otherwise indicated. Statistical analysis was performed by means of Student's t-test, Fisher's exact test or chi (2) with Yates correction; P < 0.05 was considered significant.

RESULTS

A total of 32 patients were selected and entered the study (8M/24F; mean age: 36.2 +/- 5.6 years, range 25-50 years; mean BMI 43.7+/-1.5 kg/m(2), range 40-45 kg/m(2); mean %EW: 43.1 +/- 13.1, range: 35-65). All patients completed the study. Mortality was absent. Complications related to endoscopy, balloon placement and removal were absent. Mean time of BIB positioning was 15 +/- 2 min, range 10-20 min. After the first 3 months of the study, in Group A patients the mean BMI significantly (P < 0.001) lowered from 43.5 +/- 1.1 to 38.0 +/- 2.6 kg/m(2), while in Group B patients the decrease was not significant (from 43.6 +/- 1.8 to 43.1 +/- 2.8 kg/m(2)). The mean %EWL was significantly higher in Group A than in Group B (34.0 +/- 4.8 vs 2.1 +/- 1%; P < 0.001). After crossover, at the end of the following 3 months, the BMI lowered from 38.0 +/- 2.6 to 37.1 +/- 3.4 kg/m(2) and from 43.1 +/- 2.8 to 38.8 +/- 3.1 kg/m(2) in Groups A and B, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study show that treatment of obese patients with BioEnterics Intragastric Balloon is a safe and effective procedure. In association with appropriate diet it is significantly effective in weight reduction when compared to sham procedure plus diet. The BIB procedure can play a role in weight reduction in morbidly obese patients or in the preoperative treatment of bariatric patients.