Epstein-Barr virus association is rare in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

Oesophageal carcinoma: The prevalence of DNA tumour viruses and therapy

Oesophageal carcinoma ranks the sixth leading cause of cancer death and affected 544,000 - 604,000 people in 2020. Patients often presented with a poor cancer prognosis with a low survival rate of 15-25%. Depending upon the cell type, oesophageal carcinoma is categorised into oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) and oesophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC). ESCC is predominantly reported in developing countries, while EAC is more common in developed countries. Aside from the presence of exogenous co-factors, such as cigarette smoking, alcohol consumption, obesity, gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD); infection with oncogenic viruses is suspected to be one of the major factors contributing to EC development. Oncogenic viruses, including human papillomavirus (HPV), Epstein Barr virus (EBV), Cytomegalovirus (CMV) and Herpes Simplex Virus (HSV) have been detected in various proportions of EC samples. Nonetheless, their aetiological roles in EC remain debatable. In this review, we garnered previous studies that focus on the association between oncogenic viruses and EC. Among these oncogenic viruses, HPV appears to have a stronger association with EC than the others. In addition, we also discuss the pros and cons of the treatment regimens to treat EC patients, including immunotherapy, chemo- and chemoradiotherapy, and their efficacy.

Viral Pathogens in Oesophageal and Gastric Cancer

Tumour virology was born with the discovery by Peyton Rous in 1911 of a filterable agent in chicken cellular extracts that caused neoplasia in healthy chickens. Universally, 20% of all human cancers have a viral aetiology. Viruses are involved at various stages of the carcinogenesis pathway, depending on the viral pathogen, and likely require co-factors. Multiple risk factors have been associated with oesophageal and gastric malignancy, including carcinogenic pathogens. These viruses and bacteria include human papillomavirus (HPV) [oesophageal cancer], Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) [proximal stomach cancer], and Helicobacter pylori (HP) [non-cardia stomach cancer]. Viruses such as EBV have been firmly established as causal for up to 10% of gastric cancers. HPV is associated with 13 to 35% of oesophageal adenocarcinoma but its role is unclear in oesophageal squamous cell carcinomas. The causal relationship between hepatitis B (HBV), cytomegalovirus (CMV), HPV, and John Cunningham (JCV) and gastric neoplasia remains indeterminate and warrants further study. The expression of viral antigens by human tumours offers preventive and therapeutic potential (including vaccination) and has already been harnessed with vaccines for HPV and HBV. Future goals include viral protein-based immunotherapy and monoclonal antibodies for the treatment of some of the subset of EBV and HPV-induced gastro-esophageal cancers.

Endoscopic and pathologic motifs for the clinical diagnosis of Epstein–Barr virus‐associated gastric cancer

Objectives

Based on the recent therapeutic trends for gastric cancer (GC), the clinical impact of the diagnosis of Epstein–Barr virus (EBV)‐associated GC (EBVaGC) appears to be important. We retrospectively analyzed endoscopic and pathologic motifs of GC lesions to narrow the number of candidates for EBV testing.

Methods

We performed EBV tests for 32 upper gastrointestinal lesions of 32 patients in the clinical setting. These tests were ordered by endoscopists or by pathologists without an endoscopist's order. EBV‐encoded small RNA1 (EBER1) in situ hybridization was used for the EBV tests. The endoscopic motif for the EBV test was the location in the upper part of the stomach or remnant stomach, mainly the depressed type with a submucosal tumor‐like protrusion of the lesion. The pathologic motif was carcinoma with lymphoid stroma (CLS) or CLS‐like histology of the lesion. We retrospectively analyzed the results of EBV tests for the endoscopic and pathologic motifs.

Results

The final pathological diagnoses of the 32 subjects were 26 GCs including CLS, gastric endocrine cell carcinoma, gastric hepatoid carcinoma, gastric T‐cell lymphoma, gastritis of the remnant stomach, esophageal adenocarcinoma, and esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. When nontypical lesions were excluded, the EBER1‐positive rate was 42.3% (11/26) in GCs. Of the 14 GC lesions ordered examined by endoscopists, three (21.4%) were EBVaGC. Eight of the 12 (66.7%) GCs ordered examined by pathologists were EBVaGC.

Conclusions

The pathologic motif is expected to be useful and the endoscopic motif may be helpful for EBVaGC diagnosis.

Co-expression of Epstein-Barr virus-encoded RNA1 and viral latent membrane protein 1 in osteosarcoma: A novel insight of predictive markers

Epstein-Barr virus is an etiologic agent of several malignancies. In this study, we explored the association of Epstein-Barr virus-encoded RNA1 and Epstein-Barr virus latent membrane protein 1 co-expression with osteosarcoma. Epstein-Barr virus-encoded RNA1 expression in tumor cells was quantified using reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction and in situ hybridization and Epstein-Barr virus latent membrane protein 1 expression was measured using immunohistochemistry staining. There was a statistically significant association between Epstein-Barr virus latent membrane protein 1 and Epstein-Barr virus-encoded RNA1 co-expression and characteristics of osteosarcoma such as nodal stage (p < 0.04), metastasis (p < 0.04), Ki67 index (p < 0.03), and tumor stage (p < 0.05). Co-expression of Epstein-Barr virus-encoded RNA1 and Epstein-Barr virus latent membrane protein 1 in tumors correlated with advanced osteosarcoma and indicated the aggressiveness of bone sarcoma.

Viruses in Cancers of the Digestive System: Active Contributors or Idle Bystanders?

The human virome, which is a collection of all the viruses that are present in the human body, is increasingly being recognized as an essential part of the human microbiota. The human gastrointestinal tract and related organs (e.g., liver, pancreas, and gallbladder)-composing the gastrointestinal (or digestive) system-contain a huge number of viral particles which contribute to maintaining tissue homeostasis and keeping our body healthy. However, perturbations of the virome steady-state may, both directly and indirectly, ignite/sustain oncogenic mechanisms contributing to the initiation of a dysplastic process and/or cancer progression. In this review, we summarize and discuss the available evidence on the association and role of viruses in the development of cancers of the digestive system.

Epstein-Barr virus and mismatch repair deficiency status differ between oesophageal and gastric cancer: A large multi-centre study

BACKGROUND

Oesophageal (OeC) and gastric (GC) cancer patients are treated with similar multimodal therapy and have poor survival. There remains an urgent clinical need to identify biomarkers to individualise patient management and improve outcomes. Therapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors has shown promising results in other cancers. Proposed biomarkers to predict potential response to immune checkpoint inhibitors include DNA mismatch repair (MMR) and/or Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) status. The aim of this study was to establish and compare EBV status and MMR status in large multi-centre series of OeC and GC.

METHODS

EBV was assessed by EBV-encoded RNA (EBER) in situ hybridisation and MMR protein expression by immunohistochemistry (IHC) in 988 OeC and 1213 GC from multiple centres. In a subset of OeC, microsatellite instability (MSI) was tested in parallel with MMR IHC.

RESULTS

Frequency of MMR deficiency (MMRdef) and MSI was low in OeC (0.8% and 0.6%, respectively) compared with GC (10.3%). None of the OeCs were EBER positive in contrast to 4.8% EBER positive GC. EBV positive GC patients were younger (p = 0.01), more often male (p = 0.001) and had a better overall survival (p = 0.012). MMRdef GC patients were older (p = 0.001) and showed more often intestinal-type histology (p = 0.022).

CONCLUSIONS

This is the largest study to date indicating that EBV and MMRdef do not play a role in OeC carcinogenesis in contrast to GC. The potential clinical usefulness of determining MMRdef/EBV status to screen patients for eligibility for immune-targeting therapy differs between OeC and GC patients.

Viruses, Other Pathogenic Microorganisms and Esophageal Cancer

BACKGROUND

Esophageal cancer (EC) is the eighth most prevalent malignant tumor and the sixth leading cause of cancer mortality throughout the world. Despite the technical developments in diagnosis and treatment, the 5-year survival rate is still low. The etiology of EC remains poorly understood; multiple risk factors may be involved and account for the great variation in EC incidence in different geographic regions.

SUMMARY

Infection with carcinogenetic pathogens has been proposed as a risk factor for EC. This review explores the recent studies on the association of human papillomavirus (HPV), Epstein-Barr virus (EBV), Helicobacter pylori and esophageal bacterial biota with EC.

KEY MESSAGE

Among the above-mentioned pathogens, HPV most likely contributes to esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) in high-risk populations. New techniques are being applied to studies on the role of infection in EC, which will inevitably bring novel ideas to the field in the near future.

PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS

Multiple meta-analyses support the finding of a higher HPV detection rate in regions associated with high risk for ESCC compared to low-risk areas. A potential role of HPV in the rise of esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) was proposed recently. However, further studies are required before a firm conclusion can be drawn. Less work has been done in studying the association between EBV and ESCC, and the results are quite controversial. H. pylori infection is found to be inversely related to EC, which is probably due to the reduced incidence of gastroesophageal reflux disease. Analysis of the esophageal bacterial biota revealed distinct clusters of bacteria in normal and diseased esophagi. A type II microbiome rich in Gram-negative bacteria potentially contributes to EAC by inducing chronic inflammation. Novel findings from such studies as these may benefit public health by justifying anti-infection measures to prevent EC.

Second primary esophageal or lung cancer in patients with head and neck carcinoma in Taiwan: incidence and risk in relation to primary index tumor site

BACKGROUND

Second primary cancer is prevalent in patients with head and neck cancer (HNC), for which esophagus and lung are the most usual sites, associated with an extremely poor prognosis. However, information regarding the actual risk of second primary esophageal or lung cancer in South-east Asia, the betel-quid chewing area, has been restricted to data from single-institutions. We have therefore conducted a population-based study to evaluate the incidence, risk, and developmental time of second esophageal or lung cancer in HNC patients.

METHODS

Standardized incidence ratios (SIRs) and cumulative incidences were calculated for second primary esophageal or lung cancer using a database from the Taiwan Cancer Registry that included 63,720 cases having an initial diagnosis of HNC.

RESULTS

The risk of second esophageal cancer was increased in patients with oral/pharyngeal (SIR = 8.71, 95% CI 7.55-10.01) and laryngeal (SIR = 4.65, 95% CI 3.37-6.27) cancers, whereas second lung risk was increased in patients with laryngeal (SIR = 2.05, 95% CI 1.69-2.45) and oral/pharyngeal (SIR = 1.56, 95% CI 1.34-1.80) cancers. The risk excess was prominent for patients with a follow-up interval <5 years and a first primary cancer diagnosed at age <50. Nevertheless, patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma were not associated with an excess risk in second esophageal or lung cancer.

CONCLUSIONS

The present dataset provides definite evidence that there is a substantial excess risk of second primary esophageal or lung cancer for the index tumors of oral cavity, pharynx and larynx. The absence of risk excess found in nasopharyngeal carcinoma is also compatible with the existing knowledge that it might have an entirely distinctive etiology.

Northwestern China: a place to learn more on oesophageal cancer. Part one: behavioural and environmental risk factors

Oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) remains a public health problem in many countries, especially in emerging and developing countries. Epidemiology of OSCC is characterized by marked differences in prevalence between countries/regions/ethnical groups. The highest incidence in the world is reached by populations living in specific areas of northwestern Xinjiang, China where age-adjusted mortality may reach 150 of 100 000. In fact, there are also marked differences among the various geographical areas and the various ethnic groups within the region, which suggests specific risk factors. Behavioural factors include those factors which are common to all 'high-risk populations', such as tobacco smoking and alcohol drinking. However, the very unusual sex ratio (1.2 : 1.0) and young age range of OSCC occurrence suggests the involvement of additional early risk factors shared by males and females, and which are different from those studied in other 'high-risk' areas of the world, including China, such as LinXian area. These include drinking very hot and salted tea, boiled with milk; a diet rich in meat, especially salted, dry and/or smoked meat, and dairy products; and a diet poor in fresh fruit and vegetables. The combination of hot drinks (such as milk, tea and soups) and high-degree spirit drinks, and hard food (bread, meat and cheese), together with poor oral hygiene and tooth loss, is likely to add mechanical injury of the oesophagus to other factors linked to climate characteristics of the area (drought) and dietary habits, which promote a sodium and nitrosamine-rich diet. Association of early and severe hypertension in the same populations at high risk of OSCC might likely raise more attention. Human papilloma virus (HPV) infection, and especially HPV 16/18 E6/E7, with gene mutations and association with p53 overexpression, may contribute to the extremely high incidence of OSCC observed in Xinjiang, and could be accessible to prevention. Infection may especially be a crucial additional factor in the Uygur population in which not only HPV infection but also infection with other oncogenic viruses, such as HHV8, are highly prevalent. Genetic polymorphism might interact with viruses and/or viral products to promote carcinogenesis. These observations in northwestern China suggest that usually neglected factors, such as sodium excess and viral infection, could be taken into more account when studying OSCC risk factors in other parts of the world, especially Europe.

The role of viral and bacterial pathogens in gastrointestinal cancer

The association of Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) with gastric cancer is thus far the best understood model to comprehend the causal relationship between a microbial pathogen and cancer in the human gastrointestinal tract. Besides H. pylori, a variety of other pathogens are now being recognized as potential carcinogens in different settings of human cancer. In this context, viral causes of human cancers are central to the issue since these account for 10-20% of cancers worldwide. In the case of H. pylori and gastric cancer, as well as the human papillomavirus and anal cancer, the causal relationship between the infectious agent and the related cancer in the gastrointestinal tract has been clearly confirmed by epidemiological and experimental studies. Similarly, Epstein-Barr virus and the oncogenic JC virus are being suggested as possible causative agents for cancers in the upper and lower gastrointestinal tract. This review discusses various viral and microbial pathogens and their oncogenic properties in the evolution of gastrointestinal carcinogenesis and summarizes the available experimental data make a convincing agreement favoring the associations between infectious agents and specific human cancers.