Development of a simple and sensitive technique for detection of point mutations in the K-ras oncogene

A Pterin-FAM-TAMRA Tri-color Fluorescence Biosensor to Detect the Level of KRAS Point Mutation

Monitoring the changes in the level of KRAS point mutation (the concentration fraction of the KRAS point mutated DNA to the total DNA) in clinical treatment progress can guide and greatly improve the personalized therapy and therapeutic evaluation of patients with cancer. In this work, based on FRET fluorescence quenching and apyrimidinic site-induced guanine/pterin specific binding, we developed a pterin-FAM-TAMRA tri-color fluorescence sensing system to assess the level of KRAS point mutation in one step. The responses from TAMRA displayed good and similar linear correlations in the range from 60 nM to 2 μM for all four types of DNA, resulting in a common linear equation related to the T-DNA concentration (N_ΔFTAMRA = 2.908c_T-DNA + 0.364). Meanwhile, the responses from pterin showed excellent selectivity to W-DNA and an excellent linear correlation to the W-DNA in the concentration range from 60 nM to 1 μM (N_ΔFpterin = -0.364c_gDNA-G + 0.034). This biosensor has an effective concentration range for detecting KRAS point mutations. Especially, because the apyrimidinic site-induced guanine/pterin binding is selective for the detection of wild-type DNA, the sensing system can be applied for clinical mutation level detection of all kinds of KRAS point mutations (G → A, G → C and G → T) in blood samples, which is crucial for the personalized therapy and therapeutic evaluation of patients with most KRAS-related cancer types.

Clinical relevance of KRAS in human cancers

The KRAS gene (Ki-ras2 Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog) is an oncogene that encodes a small GTPase transductor protein called KRAS. KRAS is involved in the regulation of cell division as a result of its ability to relay external signals to the cell nucleus. Activating mutations in the KRAS gene impair the ability of the KRAS protein to switch between active and inactive states, leading to cell transformation and increased resistance to chemotherapy and biological therapies targeting epidermal growth factor receptors. This review highlights some of the features of the KRAS gene and the KRAS protein and summarizes current knowledge of the mechanism of KRAS gene regulation. It also underlines the importance of activating mutations in the KRAS gene in relation to carcinogenesis and their importance as diagnostic biomarkers, providing clues regarding human cancer patients' prognosis and indicating potential therapeutic approaches.

Detection of circulating tumor cells and of tumor DNA in plasma during tumor progression in rats

The role and clinical significance of circulating tumor cells and of tumor DNA in the plasma have not yet been clarified. In the present study, we compared rates of detection of tumor-derived DNA in the buffy coat to those in plasma from tumor-bearing rats, and we attempted to correlate these rates with the progression of tumors. We injected DHD/K12-PROb cancer cells subcutaneously into BD-IX rats and divided the animals into six groups according to the time between the injection of tumor cells and euthanasia. After euthanasia, macroscopic metastases were assessed and samples of blood and lung were collected. We used mutant allele-specific amplification by PCR to detect tumor-derived DNA. We detected tumor DNA in lung samples from the first week after inoculation, in plasma from the third week and in the buffy coat from the fifth week. All animals analyzed on the 11th week had macro- or micrometastases in their lungs. Regardless of group, the rate of PCR-positive plasma samples was significantly higher than that of circulating tumor cells (P=0.005). In animals with metastases, this difference was also statistically significant (P=0.008). However, neither the detection of tumor DNA in the plasma nor the presence of circulating tumor cells was strongly correlated with the presence of metastases. Thus, cell-free tumor DNA was detected sooner and more frequently than circulating tumor cells and the dissemination of tumor DNA in the plasma seems to be much more common than detectable hematogenic tumor cells during the spread of colorectal cancer.