Modified Interlaminar Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy for Highly Upmigrated Disc Herniation: A Proctorship Description of the Technique via Translaminar Route

Full Endoscopic Translaminar Keyhole Diskectomy for Highly Upmigrated Lumbar Disk Herniation: A Case Report

CASE

A 49-year-old man underwent full endoscopic translaminar keyhole diskectomy for highly upmigrated disk herniation at L5-S1. This scope-in-scope technique involved creation of a targeted fenestration in the lamina using a large working cannula (13.7 mm) and endoscope (10 mm). This was followed by advancement of a smaller working cannula (7.5 mm) and endoscope (6.3 mm) into the fenestration to remove the upmigrated disk fragment. Surgery resulted in excellent outcomes.

CONCLUSION

This can be a safe and effective surgical option for highly upmigrated disk herniation. It limits the amount of bone removal by directly targeting the herniated fragment and reduces the chances of neural injury.

A Novel Classification of Migrated Lumbar Disk Herniation Based on Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Algorithm Recommendations for Full-Endoscopic Discectomy

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective clinical study.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to establish a novel classification of migrated lumbar disk herniation (LDH) based on magnetic resonance imaging and provide appropriate treatment strategies for each type through algorithms.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Full-endoscopic lumbar discectomy is a surgical technique that has been developed rapidly in recent years. For migrated LDH, few surgeons currently classify it with multiplanar positioning, and there is no consensus on the choice of treatment strategy. Therefore, we established a new multiplanar classification criteria that can localize the lesions more accurately than previous studies.

METHODS

A total of 263 eligible patients from March 2017 to March 2022 were included. Protrusions for each patient were located based on our classification and the surgical approach was selected according to our algorithms. The clinical symptoms of all patients before surgery, and at 1 day, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months after surgery were collected. Evaluations were performed using visual analogue scale (VAS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and modified MacNab criteria. We used the chi-squared test, one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), and t-test to compare perioperative results and postoperative 3-month, 6-month, and 12-month follow-up results.

RESULTS

VAS (low back pain) scores were reduced from 5.33 ± 2.67 to 0.73 ± 0.77 (p < 0.001), and VAS (leg pain) scores were reduced from 7.44 ± 2.21 to 0.37 ± 0.51 (p < 0.001). ODI scores improved from 58.46 ± 8.04 to 12.57 ± 2.51 (p < 0.001). According to the modified MacNab criteria, the excellent and good rate reached 92.78% at the 12-month follow-up. Twenty-six patients developed complications, all of which improved after treatment. Recurrence occurred in 13 patients, and four of them underwent secondary surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

This is an innovative classification method using multi-plane positioning, and the algorithm used with it can help surgeons make appropriate choices when using endoscopic technology to treat migrated LDH. Statistical analysis of follow-up data confirmed that this is a safe and effective strategy.

Interlaminar Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy Versus Microscopic Lumbar Discectomy: A Preliminary Analysis of L5-S1 Lumbar Disc Herniation Outcomes in Prospective Randomized Controlled Trials

OBJECTIVE

A preliminary report from a single institution, noninferiority, prospective randomized controlled trial is conducted to determine the effectiveness of interlaminar endoscopic lumbar discectomy (IELD) versus microscopic lumbar discectomy (MLD) for the treatment of L5-S1 lumbar disc herniation (LDH).

METHODS

This prospective, noncrossover, randomized controlled trials was conducted at a single neurosurgical center. Patients with symptomatic radiculopathy or intermittent neurogenic claudication caused by LDH were enrolled from July 2016 to July 2021. The study compared the effectiveness of microscopic and full-endoscopic discectomy procedures. Outcome measures included visual analogue scale (VAS) scores for back and leg pain, Oswestry Disability Index scores, radiologic measurements, endurance time of walking, and satisfaction rate.

RESULTS

Of 37 assessed patients, both IELD and MLD groups demonstrated significant improvements in VAS scores for pain over time, with no significant difference between them. For secondary outcomes, the IELD group had a shorter hospital stay and reduced blood loss but a longer operation time than the MLD group. Radiographic evaluations showed no change compared to preoperative data. Patient satisfaction and recovery rates were slightly higher for the MLD group, but both groups were comparable in most evaluations, with complications being minimal.

CONCLUSION

The IELD was noninferior in improving the intensity of back and leg pain and functional disability, compared to the MLD. Additionally, the IELD showed no difference in clinical outcomes for patients in terms of radiographic results and patient satisfaction rates. The results of this research preliminarily demonstrate that the IELD could be considered an effective alternative to MLD for L5-S1 central or paracentral LDH.

One-hole split endoscope technique for migrated lumbar disc herniation: a single-centre, retrospective study of a novel technique

BACKGROUND

Lumbar disc herniation (LDH) is one of the most common diseases of the spine, and migrated LDH is a more serious type, associated with nerve root function injury or abnormality. Regarding the increasing surgery adoption of treating migrated LDH, we aimed to investigate the clinical efficacy and safety of discectomy with a novel technique-one-hole split endoscope (OSE) technique.

METHODS

This was a retrospective analysis of migrated LDH treated between December 2020 and September 2021. Hospitalization time, operative duration, intraoperative blood loss, number of fluoroscopy exposures, incision length, postoperative facet preservation rate, number of excellent-good cases, lower back and leg visual analogue score (VAS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and surgical complications were compared between high-grade migration group (82 cases) and low-grade migration group (148 cases). The Macnab criteria was used to evaluate the clinical outcome. The Shapiro‒Wilk test was used to test measurement data, and the χ² test was used to test counting data.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in hospitalization time, operative duration, intraoperative blood loss, number of fluoroscopy exposures, incision length or postoperative facet preservation rate between the two groups by independent sample t test or nonparametric test. At any time point, the lower back and leg VAS and ODI of the two groups were significantly improved compared to those before the operation, but there was no significant difference between the two groups at the same time point by two-way repeated measures ANOVA. There were two cases of postoperative nerve root stimulation symptoms in the high-grade migration group and three cases in the low-grade migration group. There was one patient reoperated in the high-grade migration group. There was no significant difference in number of excellent-good cases between the two groups. The overall excellent-good rate was 89.6%.

CONCLUSION

The OSE technique has the advantages of less trauma, faster recovery, complete removal of the nucleus pulposus and a satisfactory early clinical efficacy in the treatment of migrated LDH.

Cost-utility analysis of endoscopic lumbar discectomy following a uniform clinical pathway in the Korean national health insurance system

INTRODUCTION

Full-endoscopic lumbar discectomy (FELD) is a type of minimally invasive spinal surgery for lumbar disc herniation (LDH). Sufficient evidence exists to recommend FELD as an alternative to standard open microdiscectomy, and some patients prefer FELD due to its minimally invasive nature. However, in the Republic of Korea, the National Health Insurance System (NHIS) controls the reimbursement and use of supplies for FELD, but FELD is not currently reimbursed by the NHIS. Nonetheless, FELD has been performed upon patients' request, but providing FELD for patients' sake is inherently an unstable arrangement in the absence of a practical reimbursement system. The purpose of this study was to conduct a cost-utility analysis of FELD to suggest appropriate reimbursements.

METHOD

This study was a subgroup analysis of prospectively collected data including 28 patients who underwent FELD. All patients were NHIS beneficiaries and followed a uniform clinical pathway. Quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) were assessed with a utility score using the EuroQol 5-Dimension (EQ-5D) instrument. The costs included direct medical costs incurred at the hospital for 2 years and the price of the electrode ($700), although it was not reimbursed. The costs and QALYs gained were used to calculate the cost per QALY gained.

RESULT

Patients' mean age was 43 years and one-third (32%) were women. L4-5 was the most common surgical level (20/28, 71%) and extrusion was the most common type of LDH (14, 50%). Half of the patients (15, 54%) had jobs with an intermediate level of activity. The preoperative EQ-5D utility score was 0.48±0.19. Pain, disability, and the utility score significantly improved starting 1 month postoperatively. The average EQ-5D utility score during 2 years after FELD was estimated as 0.81 (95% CI: 0.78-0.85). For 2 years, the mean direct costs were $3,459 and the cost per QALY gained was $5,241.

CONCLUSION

The cost-utility analysis showed a quite reasonable cost per QALY gained for FELD. A comprehensive range of surgical options should be provided to patients, for which a practical reimbursement system is a prerequisite.

Transforaminal endoscopic lumbar discectomy with targeted puncture and foraminotomy for very highly migrated disc herniation: A technique note with case series

Background

Transforaminal endoscopic lumbar discectomy (TELD) has been widely used for lumbar disc herniation. However, in some challenging cases such as very highly migrated disc herniation (VHMDH), traditional TELD is difficult to access the pathology.

Methods

From January 2016 to December 2019, 63 patients with single-level VHMDH underwent TELD using targeted puncture and foraminotomy techniques were included. All patients were followed up for 26.5 months on average (range, 24–48 months). Operative time, length of hospital stay, visual analog scale (VAS) score, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), modified MacNab criteria and surgical complications were evaluated.

Results

The operative time was 40–120 min (56.8 on average). The length of hospitalization was 2.5 days (range, 2–4 d). VAS score decreased significantly from 5.5 ± 1.3 preoperatively to 1.9 ± 1.30 (p < 0.001) 1 day postoperatively, and to 0.9 ± 0.8 (p < 0.001) at the final follow-up. ODI score improved significantly from 23.5 ± 3.2 preoperatively to 13.4 ± 3.0 (p < 0.001) 1 day postoperatively; and 3.1 ± 1.2 (p < 0.001) at the final follow-up. According to the modified MacNab criteria, 40 patients (63.5%) showed excellent results, 20 patients (31.7%) were rated as good, 2 patients (3.2%) were rated as fine, and 1 patient (1.6%) was rated as bad at the final follow-up. No residual fragments, nerve root or cauda equina injury was shown in this series. One recurrent case was resolved by open surgery.

Conclusions

With modified targeted puncture and foraminotomy techniques, VHMDH can be accessed safely and effectively, and satisfactory clinical outcomes can be obtained for these patients.

Percutaneous endoscopic interlaminar discectomy via inner border of inferior pedicle approach for downmigrated disc herniation: a retrospective study

Objective

To evaluate the efficacy and feasibility of percutaneous endoscopic interlaminar discectomy (PEID) via the inner border of the inferior pedicle approach for downmigrated disc herniation.

Methods

Seventeen patients who had downmigrated disc herniation were included in this study from May 2020 to February 2021. After PEID via the inner border of the inferior pedicle approach, a retrospective study was conducted on all patients. Radiologic findings were investigated, and based on the level of migration seen on preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), participants were divided into two types (high-grade and low-grade migrations). Preoperative, 1st post-operative day, 3rd post-operative month, and the final follow-up visual analogue scale (VAS) assessments for back and leg pain and preoperative, 3rd post-operative month, and the final follow-up Oswestry disability index (ODI) evaluations were performed. The clinical effects at the final follow-up were assessed by the modified MacNab criterion.

Results

All patients successfully completed surgery. There were 10 males and 7 females in the group. These patients were 42 years old on average (range, 25–68 years). Four and 13 patients had downmigrated disc herniation with high-grade and low-grade, respectively, on MRI. The mean follow-up duration was 10.47 ± 1.84 months (range, 8–14 months). The mean VAS score for back and leg improved from 5.18 ± 0.81 preoperatively to 1.35 ± 0.49 at the final follow-up (P < 0.05) and 6.94 ± 0.66 preoperatively to 1.47 ± 0.51 at the final follow-up (P < 0.05), respectively. The mean ODI score improved from 48.00 ± 3.64 preoperatively to 18.71 ± 1.31 at the final follow-up (P < 0.05). According to the modified MacNab criterion, 15 patients (88.2%) obtained excellent, while the rest 2 patients (11.8%) reported good outcomes.

Conclusion

PEID via the inner border of the inferior pedicle approach could be a good alternative option for the treatment of downmigrated disc herniation.

Targeted fully endoscopic visualized laminar trepanning approach under local anaesthesia for resection of highly migrated lumbar disc herniation

PURPOSE

To introduce a new fully endoscopic visualized laminar trepanning approach with a periendoscopic trephine under local anesthesia for resection of highly migrated lumbar disc herniation (LDH) and report the clinical outcomes of one year follow-up.

METHODS

Twenty-one patients with highly migrated LDH who underwent percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy via the laminar trepanning approach from June 2019 to August 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Short Forms-Pain Interference (PI) and Physical Function (PF) were selected as outcome measures. The operating duration and complication were documented.

RESULTS

The average age of the 21 patients (15 males, 6 females) was 37.8 ± 6.0 years (29-52 years). Disc migration originated from L4/5 in 19 patients, L5/S1 in two patients. The mean operative duration was 54.1 ± 9.0 minutes (42-79 min). All patients were followed up to 12 months after the operation. PROMIS PI T-scores decreased significantly from pre-operatively mean 68.6 ± 2.4 to 54.4 ± 1.9 (P < 0.001) and 47.1 ± 4.3 (P < 0.001) at six weeks and 12 months, respectively. PROMIS PF T-scores improved significantly from pre-operatively mean 26.7 ± 4.7 to 44.3 ± 4.2(P < 0.001) and 58.4 ± 4.0 (P < 0.001) at six weeks and 12 months, respectively. No complications and disc herniation recurrences occurred.

CONCLUSION

The targeted full endoscopic laminar trepanning under local anesthesia with a visualized periendoscopic trephine offers a safe, efficient and cost-effective option for the resection of highly migrated LDH.

Spine Surgery Assisted by Augmented Reality: Where Have We Been?

This present systematic review examines spine surgery literature supporting augmented reality (AR) technology and summarizes its current status in spinal surgery technology. Database search strategies were retrieved from PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Embase, from the earliest records to April 1, 2021. Our review briefly examines the history of AR, and enumerates different device application workflows in a variety of spinal surgeries. We also sort out the pros and cons of current mainstream AR devices and the latest updates. A total of 45 articles are included in our review. The most prevalent surgical applications included are the augmented reality surgical navigation system and head-mounted display. The most popular application of AR is pedicle screw instrumentation in spine surgery, and the primary responsible surgical levels are thoracic and lumbar. AR guidance systems show high potential value in practical clinical applications for the spine. The overall number of cases in AR-related studies is still rare compared to traditional surgical-assisted techniques. These lack long-term clinical efficacy and robust surgical-related statistical data. Changing healthcare laws as well as the increasing prevalence of spinal surgery are generating critical data that determines the value of AR technology.

Comparative study of the efficacy and safety of minimally invasive interlaminar full-endoscopic discectomy versus conventional microscopic discectomy in single-level lumbar herniated intervertebral disc (ENDO-F Trial): a multicenter, prospective, randomized controlled trial protocol

Background

Advances in minimally invasive surgery have expanded the indications for interlaminar full-endoscopic discectomy. Although the clinical outcomes for this approach may be equivalent to those of conventional microscopic discectomy, the supporting evidence is still based on small, single-center, prospective, and retrospective studies. Therefore, a multicenter randomized controlled trial is warranted.

Methods

This will be a prospective, multicenter, randomized controlled trial comparing the efficacy and safety of interlaminar full-endoscopic discectomy to those of conventional microscopic discectomy. The trial will enroll 100 participants with a lumbar disc herniation, 50 in each group. The primary outcome will be the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) score at 12 months post-surgery. Secondary outcomes will be back and leg pain (visual analog scale); the ODI; the EuroQol-5-dimension score; patient satisfaction; and walking distance/time and time to return to daily activities post-surgery. Surgical outcomes will include postoperative drainage, operative time, duration of hospital stay, postoperative creatine kinase level as an indicator of muscle injury, and postoperative scarring. Postoperative magnetic resonance imaging, computed tomography, and simple radiography will be performed to evaluate radiographic outcomes between the two surgical approaches. Surgery-related complications and adverse effects will be evaluated as safety outcomes. A single assessor at each participating hospital, blinded to group allocation, will assess the enrolled participants at baseline, at 2 weeks, and at 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively.

Discussion

This trial is designed to determine whether interlaminar full-endoscopic discectomy is clinically comparable to microscopic discectomy to treat lumbar disc herniations. All efforts will be made to reduce bias, including adequate sample size, blinded analyses, and multicenter prospective registration. The outcomes will inform practice, providing the evidence needed for using interlaminar full-endoscopic over microscopic discectomy by confirming the potential of this technique to improve patient satisfaction and clinical outcomes.

Trial registration: Clinical Research Information Service; cris.nih.go.kr. (KCT0006277); protocol version (v1, June 8, 2021).