Vertebral Artery Variations at the Craniovertebral Junction in "Sandwich" Atlantoaxial Dislocation Patients

Influence of variations of craniovertebral junction anatomy on safe C1 lateral mass and C2 pedicle screw insertion: a cadaveric and radiologic study

PURPOSE

The aim of the present study is to analyze the feasibility of a new optimized C1 lateral mass and C2 pedicle screw method that has a suitable trajectory for a range of anatomical variations to decrease the risk of vertebral artery injury.

METHODS

The craniovertebral junction of 17 cadavers (34 sides) were dissected after performing thin-cut computed tomography. The screw entry points, targets, angles, and lengths of the trajectories were performed for C1 lateral mass and C2 pedicle. We particularly focused on the morphometric features and the safety of trajectories in cadavers with vascular and bony variations.

RESULTS

For the C1 lateral mass, the ideal medial and cranial angles were 13.4° ± 1.0° and 14.7° ± 1.1°, respectively. For the C2 pedicle screw, the cranial and medial angles were 27.7° ± 1.4° and 20.4° ± 1.5°, respectively. High-riding vertebral arteries (HRVA) were observed in 35.3% of all cadavers. The incidence of an arcuate foramen was 47% among all sides and its coexistence with an HRVA among all cadavers was 23.5%.

CONCLUSION

Preoperative pedicle-oriented radiological evaluation is crucial before C1 lateral mass and C2 pedicle screw placement because of the high incidence of bony and vascular variations. Using our safe C2 pedicle trajectory, a longer and safer screw course that preserves the vertebral artery can be achieved with a more feasible cranial angle, even with HRVAs, with the exception of narrow pedicle anatomy.

Morphometric analysis of the C1-2 zygapophysial joint in atlantoaxial dislocation patients with sandwich fusion of the craniovertebral junction

The combination of congenital C1 occipitalization and C2-3 non-segmentation (i.e. "sandwich fusion") results in early development of atlantoaxial dislocation (AAD). A thorough understanding of the morphometry of the C1-2 zygapophysial joints is important to ensure a safe surgery. This study was aimed to evaluate the C1-2 zygapophysial joint in AAD patients with sandwich fusion by morphological research based on CT scans. This was a retrospective case-control study including 155 AAD patients with sandwich fusion in sandwich group and 55 with os odontoideum (OO) in control group. The C1 listhetic distance, sagittal inclination angle (SIA), coronal inclination angles (CIA) were measured from the CT and compared between two groups. The listhetic grade was defined according to the ratio of the listhetic distance and length of the superior facet of C2: less than 25% as mild, 25-75% as moderate, and greater than 75% as severe. Patients in the sandwich group had higher listhetic grade than the OO group (17.4% vs. 70.6%, 50.3% vs. 29.4% and 32.3% vs. 0 were of mild, moderate, and severe, respectively). The SIA and CIA in the sandwich group were greater than those in the OO group (30.1° vs. 5.0°, 36.6° vs. 31.0°, respectively). Asymmetric listhesis was found in 0.0%, 63.3%, and 85.7% of sandwich patients with mild, moderate and severe listhetic grade, respectively. AAD with sandwich fusion was a three-dimensional deformity characterized by the high prevalence of asymmetric and moderate-to-severe listhesis.

A screw algorithm for congenital C2-3 fusion with high-riding vertebral arteries: feasibilities and clinical outcomes of five different fixation techniques

OBJECTIVE

To propose a screw algorithm and investigate the anatomical feasibilities and clinical outcomes of five distinct fixation methods for C2-3 fused vertebra with high-ridding vertebral arteries (VA) (HRVA) when the C2 pedicle screw placement is unfeasible.

METHODS

Thirty surgical patients with congenital C2-3 fusion, HRVA, and atlantoaxial dislocation (AAD) were included. We designed a algorithm for alternative screw implantation into C2-3 fused vertebrae, including C2 pedicle screw with in-out-in (passing VA groove) technique (in-out-in screw), subfacetal screw, translaminar screw, lateral mass screw, C3 pedicle screw. VA diameter and position, C2 and C3 pedicles, superior facets, fused lamina, and fused lateral mass dimensions were evaluated for screw implantation indication. Implant failure, reduction loss, implant placement accuracy were investigated by computed tomography.

RESULTS

A total of 5 VAs were identified as distant VAs; a total of 2 VAs were categorized as occlusive VAs. Sufficient dimension of lateral mass and lamina provided the broadest indications for screw implantation, while the distant or occlusive VA provided the most limited indications for in-out-in screw. The indications of five alternative methods ranged from narrowest to widest as follows: in-out-in screw, C3 pedicle screw, subfacetal screw, translaminar screw, lateral mass screw. The translaminar screws and the lateral mass screws increased the probability of implant failure. All patients who received in-out-in screws, C3 pedicle screws, and subfacetal screws achieved fusion. The accuracy ranged from lowest to highest as follows: C3 pedicle screw, lateral mass screw, in-out-in screw, subfacetal screw, translaminar screw. No translaminar screws deviated.

CONCLUSIONS

The algorithm proved to be a valuable tool for screw selection in cases of C2-3 fused vertebrae with HRVAs. The subfacetal screw, boasting broad indications, a high fusion rate, and exceptional accuracy, stood as the primary preferred alternative.

Whole-Exome Sequencing Analysis Identifies Risk Genes in Atlantoaxial Dislocation Patients with Sandwich Fusion

Sandwich fusion of Klippel-Feil syndrome (KFS), which is a rare congenital disorder involving the fusion of cervical vertebrae, poses significant challenges in the diagnosis and treatment of atlantoaxial dislocation (AAD). While the disorder's genetic basis is not well-understood, the rarity of the sandwich fusion makes it difficult to study. Whole-exome sequencing (WES) was conducted on 68 unrelated Chinese patients with sandwich fusion. The study compared their genetic data with a control group of 219 individuals without musculoskeletal disorders. Various analyses, including mutational burden assessments, were employed to identify potential pathogenic genes. The study identified significant genetic variations in patients with sandwich fusion, highlighting genes like KMT5A, HYDIN, and PCDHB4 as potential contributors. Notably, severe cases exhibited oligogenic effects, with mutations in genes like MEOX1 associated with the severity of spinal issues. These findings offer critical insights into the genetic basis of sandwich fusion and provide a foundation for future research and therapeutic development.

Overstrain on the longitudinal band of the cruciform ligament during flexion in the setting of sandwich deformity at the craniovertebral junction: a finite element analysis

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

In the setting of "sandwich deformity" (concomitant C1 occipitalization and C2-3 nonsegmentation), the C1-2 joint becomes the only mobile joint in the craniovertebral junction. Atlantoaxial dislocation develops earlier with severer symptoms in sandwich deformity, which has been hypothesized to be due to the repetitive excessive tension in the ligaments between C1 and C2.

PURPOSE

To elucidate whether and how the major ligaments of the C1-2 joint are affected in sandwich deformity, and to find out the ligament most responsible for the earlier development and severer symptoms of atlantoaxial dislocation in sandwich deformity.

STUDY DESIGN

A finite element (FE) analysis study.

METHODS

A three-dimensional FE model from occiput to C5 was established using anatomical data from a thin-slice CT scan of a healthy volunteer. Sandwich deformity was simulated by eliminating any C0-1 and C2-3 segmental motion respectively. Flexion torque was applied, and the range of motion of each segment and the tension sustained by the major ligaments of C1-2 (including the transverse and longitudinal bands of the cruciform ligament, the alar ligaments, and the apical ligament) were analyzed.

RESULTS

Tension sustained by the longitudinal band of the cruciform ligament and the apical ligament during flexion is significantly larger in the FE model of sandwich deformity. In contrast, tension in the other ligaments is not significantly changed in the sandwich deformity model compared with the normal model.

CONCLUSIONS

Considering the importance of the longitudinal band of the cruciform ligament to the stability of the C1-2 joint, our findings implicate that the early onset, severe dislocation, and unique clinical manifestations of atlantoaxial dislocation in patients with sandwich deformity are mainly due to the enlarged force loaded on the longitudinal band of the cruciform ligament.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

The enlarged force loaded on the longitudinal band of the cruciform ligament can add to its laxity and thus reducing its ability to restrict the cranial migration of the odontoid process. This is in accordance with our clinical experience that dislocation of the atlantoaxial joint in patients with sandwich deformity is mainly craniocaudal, which means severer cranial neuropathy, Chiari deformity, and syringomyelia, and more difficult surgical treatment.

Characteristics and evaluation of C1 posterior arch variation for transpedicular screw placement between patients with and without basilar invagination

BACKGROUND

C1 transpedicular screw (C1TS) placement provided satisfactory pullout resistance and 3D stability, but its application might be limited in patients with basilar invagination (BI) due to the high incidences of the atlas anomaly and vertebral artery (VA) variation. However, no study has explored the classifications of C1 posterior arch variations and investigated their indications and ideal insertion trajectories for C1TS in BI.

PURPOSE

To investigate the bony and surrounding arterial characteristics of the atlas, classify posterior arch variations, identify indications for C1TS, evaluate ideal insertion trajectories for C1TS in BI patients without atlas occipitalization (AO), and compare them with those without BI and AO as control.

METHODS

A total of 130 non-AO patients with and without BI (52 patients and 78 patients, respectively) from two medical centers were included at a 1:1.5 ratio. The posterior arch variations were assessed using a modified C1 morphological classification. Comparisons regarding the bony and surrounding arterial characteristics, morphological classification distributions, and ideal insertion trajectories between BI and control groups were performed. The subgroup analyses based on different morphological classifications were also conducted. In addition, the factors possibly affecting the insertion parameters were investigated using multiple linear regression analyses.

RESULTS

The BI group was associated with significantly smaller lateral mass height and width, sagittal length of posterior arch, pedicle height, vertical height of posterior arch, and distance between VA and VA groove (VAG) than control group. Four types of posterior arch variations with indications for different screw placement techniques were classified; Classifications I and II were suitable for C1TS. The BI cohort showed a significantly lower rate of Classification I than the control cohort. In the BI group, the subgroup of Classification I had significantly larger distance between the insertion point (IP) and inferior aspect of the posterior arch. In addition, it had the narrowest width along ideal screw trajectory, but a significantly more lateral ideal mediolateral angle than the subgroup of Classification II. Multiple linear regression indicated that the cephalad angle was significantly associated with the diagnosis of BI (B = 3.708, P < 0.001) and sagittal diameter of C1 (B = 3.417, P = 0.027); the ideal mediolateral angle was significantly associated with BMI (B = 0.264, P = 0.031), sagittal diameter of C1 (B =  - 4.559, P = 0.002), and pedicle height (B =  - 2.317, P < 0.001); the distance between the IP and inferior aspects of posterior arch was significantly associated with age (B =  - 0.002, P = 0.035), BMI (B =  - 0.007, P = 0.028), sagittal length of posterior arch (B =  - 0.187, P = 0.032), pedicle height (B =  - 0.392, P < 0.001), and middle and lower parts of posterior arch (B = 0.862, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The incidence of posterior arch variation in BI patients without AO was remarkably higher than that in control patients. The insertion parameters of posterior screws were different between the morphological classification types in BI and control groups. The distance between VA V3 segments and VAG in BI cohort was substantially smaller than that in control cohort. Preoperative individual 3D computed tomography (CT), CT angiography and intraoperative navigation are recommended for BI patients receiving posterior screw placement.

Anterior Transarticular Crossing Screw Fixation for Atlantoaxial Joint Instability: A Biomechanical Study

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the biomechanical stability of anterior transarticular crossing screw (ATCS) and compare it with anterior transarticular screw (ATS) which may provide basic evidence for clinical application.

METHODS

Eight human fresh cadaveric specimens (occiput-C4) were tested with 5 conditions including the intact status, the injury status (type II odontoid fracture), the injury+ATS fixation status (traditional bilateral ATS fixation); the injury+unilateral ATCS fixation status; and the injury+bilateral ATCS fixation status. Specimens were applied to a pure moment of 1.5 Nm in flexion-extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation, respectively. The range of motions (ROMs) and the neutral zones (NZs) of C1 to C2 segment were calculated and compared between 5 status.

RESULTS

ATS and ATCS fixations significantly reduced the motions in all directions when compared with the intact and injury statues (p < 0.05). In flexion-extension, the ROMs of ATS, unilateral ATCS, and bilateral ATCS were 4.7° ± 2.5°, 4.1° ± 1.9°, and 3.2° ± 1.2°, respectively. Bilateral ATCS resulted in a significant decrease in ROM in flexion-extension when compared with ATS and unilateral ATCS (p = 0.035 and p = 0.023). In lateral bending and axial rotation, there was no significant difference in ROM between the 3 fixations (p > 0.05). Three fixations resulted in similar NZs in all directions (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

ATCS is a biomechanically effective alternative or supplemental method for atlantoaxial instability.

Clinical and Surgical Characteristics of Patients with Atlantoaxial Dislocation in the Setting of "Sandwich Fusion": A Case-Control Study

BACKGROUND

Patients with "sandwich" fusion (concomitant C1 occipitalization and C2-C3 nonsegmentation), a subtype of Klippel-Feil syndrome, are at particular risk for developing atlantoaxial dislocation (AAD). However, the clinical and surgical characteristics of AAD in patients with sandwich fusion have not been clearly defined.

METHODS

A retrospective case-control study with a large sample size and a minimum 2-year follow-up was performed. From 2000 to 2018, 253 patients with sandwich AAD underwent a surgical procedure; these patients constituted the case group, and a matching number of patients with non-sandwich AAD were randomly selected to form the control group. Clinical data from electronic medical records and various imaging studies were analyzed and compared. The Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) scale was used to evaluate neurological function.

RESULTS

Patients with sandwich AAD, compared with patients with non-sandwich AAD, had symptom onset at a younger age (34.8 compared with 42.8 years; p < 0.001) and had a higher likelihood for myelopathy (87.4% compared with 74.7%; p < 0.001). Patients with sandwich AAD had a higher incidence of lower cranial nerve palsy (7.9% compared with 0.0%; p < 0.001), a lower preoperative JOA score (13.4 compared with 14.2; p < 0.001), and higher incidences of accompanying Type-I Chiari malformation (20.9% compared with 1.2%; p < 0.001) and syringomyelia (21.3% compared with 1.6%; p < 0.001). Finally, patients with sandwich AAD had higher likelihoods of undergoing transoral release (28.5% compared with 5.1%; p < 0.001) and use of salvage fixation techniques (34.4% compared with 6.3%; p < 0.001), and had lower postoperative results for the JOA score (14.9 compared with 15.9; p < 0.001) and improvement rate (43.8% compared with 58.2%; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with sandwich AAD demonstrated distinct clinical manifestations. Versatility involving the use of various internal fixation techniques and transoral release procedures was frequently required in the surgical management of these patients, and meticulous and personalized preoperative planning would be of paramount importance.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Application of C2 subfacetal screws for the management of atlantoaxial dislocation in patients with Klippel-Feil syndrome characterized by a narrow C2 pedicle and high-riding vertebral artery

Objective

This study aims to investigate the clinical application and feasibility of C2 subfacetal screws in patients with Klippel-Feil syndrome (KFS), narrow C2 pedicles, and high-riding vertebral arteries (HRVAs).

Methods

The clinical data of seven patients with KFS, atlantoaxial dislocation, narrow C2 pedicles, and HRVAs treated with C2 subfacetal screws were analyzed in this retrospective study. The internal height, isthmus height, and pedicle width of C2 vertebra were measured using preoperative computed tomography (CT). Subfacetal screws were inserted for 7 patients (12 sides). The position and length of the screws were observed using postoperative CT. Intraoperative dura mater and vertebral artery (VA) injuries were recorded. Bone fusion was observed using follow-up CT.

Results

The internal height was 10.5 ± 3.2 mm, the isthmus height was 3.7 ± 1.8 mm, the pedicle width was 3.0 ± 1.4 mm, and the screw length was 19.7 ± 1.5 mm. All patients had HRVAs and narrow pedicles. No injury to the dura mater and vertebral artery (VA) occurred in this group of patients. Bone fusion was achieved in all patients during follow-up.

Conclusions

In patients with KFS, HRVA, and a narrow C2 pedicle, there is sufficient space below the C2 articular surface for screw insertion. When the pedicle is narrow and the C2 pedicle screw is not suitable for placement due to possible injury to the VA, subfacetal screws are a feasible alternative.