Global Sex Disparity of COVID-19: A Descriptive Review of Sex Hormones and Consideration for the Potential Therapeutic Use of Hormone Replacement Therapy in Older Adults

Does the SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccine and its serum IgG levels affect fertility treatments and obstetric outcomes? An observational cohort study

BACKGROUND

Although there are some data regarding the COVID-19 vaccine and in in vitro fertilization (IVF) treatments, its potential impact in terms of serum immunoglobulin G (IgG) levels has not been evaluated prospectively. This study aimed to assess the effect of COVID-19 vaccine and IgG levels on IVF outcomes.

METHODS

This observational, cohort study was conducted at a referral IVF unit. Couples undergoing IVF treatment during the COVID-19 vaccination period were recruited from March-April 2021. The study compared 38 women who had received the Pfizer mRNA COVID-19 vaccination to 10 women who had not and were not infected by the virus. We also compared pre- and post-vaccination IVF treatments for 24 women. The relation between serologic titers and IVF treatment outcomes was also assessed.

RESULTS

No significant difference was found between the vaccinated and unvaccinated/uninfected groups regarding the main outcome measures. However, there was a trend toward a higher pregnancy rate for the unvaccinated group (57% vs. 23%, p = 0.078) but no difference in delivery rate (p = 0.236), gestational week (p = 0.537) or birth rate (p = 0.671).

CONCLUSION

We cautiously state that the COVID-19 mRNA vaccine does not affect fertility outcomes, including fertilization, pregnancy and delivery rates, obstetric outcomes, and semen parameters, regardless of measured IgG levels.

Aging During the Pandemic: Untangling the Complexities of COVID-19 and Geriatric Care

The COVID-19 pandemic has posed unprecedented challenges to the global healthcare system, with the elderly population being particularly vulnerable. This comprehensive review synthesizes the findings from publications in "Aging and Disease", highlighting the unique challenges older adults encountered during the pandemic and providing solutions thereof. These studies provide invaluable insights into the elderly population's vulnerabilities and needs during the COVID-19 pandemic. The susceptibility to the virus in older individuals remains debatable, and research on the clinical picture of COVID-19 in older populations has yielded insights into clinical features, molecular mechanisms, and potential therapeutic strategies. This review intends to shed light on the need of sustaining physical and mental well-being among older adults during the periods of lockdown by extensively exploring these concerns and emphasizing the need for targeted interventions and support systems for this population. Ultimately, the findings of these studies contribute to developing more effective and comprehensive approaches to managing and mitigating the risks posed by the pandemic to the elderly.

Hormone Replacement Therapy and COVID-19 Outcomes in Solid Organ Transplant Recipients Compared with the General Population

Exogenous estrogen is associated with reduced COVID mortality in non-immunosuppressed/immunocompromised (non-ISC) post-menopausal females. Here, we examined the association of estrogen or testosterone hormone replacement therapy (HRT) with COVID outcomes in solid organ transplant recipients (SOTR) compared to non-ISC individuals, given known differences in sex-based risk in these populations. SOTR >45y with COVID-19 between 04-01-2020 and 07-31-2022 were identified using the National COVID Cohort Collaborative. The association of HRT use in the last 24 months (exogenous systemic estrogens for females; testosterone for males) with major adverse renal or cardiac events (MARCE) in the 90-days post COVID diagnosis and other secondary outcomes were examined using multivariable cox proportional hazards models and logistic regression. We repeated these analyses in a non-ISC control group for comparison. Our study included 1,135 SOTR and 43,383 immunocompetent patients on HRT with COVID-19. In non-ISC, HRT use was associated with lower risk of MARCE (aHR 0.61, 95% CI 0.57-0.65 for females; aHR 0.70, 0.65-0.77 for males), and all secondary outcomes. In SOTR, HRT reduced the risk of AKI (aHR 0.79, 0.63-0.98) and mortality (aHR 0.49, 0.28-0.85) in males with COVID, but not in females. The potentially modifying effects of immunosuppression on the benefits of HRT requires further investigation.

The relationship between sex steroids (E2, progesterone, and AMH) levels and severity and fatality of COVID-19: A systematic review

Sex steroids are powerful modulators of the immune system and they may affect the immune response and inflammatory consequences of COVID-19. This systematic review aims to explore the impact of sex steroids on COVID-19 mortality and complications. We looked up the keywords of the study in Scopus, PubMed, and Web of Science. All related original articles published in English, as of October 16, 2021, were reviewed to be included in our research. Concerns regarding the effect of sex hormones on COVID-19, eight full texts have been identified for the conclusion. In these studies, the relationship between estradiol and COVID-19 mortality has been mentioned. The most significant findings were the higher COVID-19 mortality rate in men, compared to women; also, in menopausal women compared to younger women and who received estradiol. In two studies, oral contraceptive pills had a protective effect on the morbidity of SARS-CoV-2 infection. In a randomized controlled trial, subcutaneous injection of progesterone in hospitalized men significantly reduced their symptoms and need for oxygen therapy. Hormone replacement therapy was positively associated with reducing COVID-19 symptoms. Although the results were insufficient for a conclusion, this study represents estrogen as an appropriate pharmacological method for preventing and diminishing the inflammation related to COVID-19 disease. However, future prospective studies and clinical trials are needed to clarify and approve this protective effect.

Premenopausal and postmenopausal women during the COVID-19 pandemic

The current global COVID-19 mortality rate is estimated to be around 3.4%; however, it is dependent on age, sex, and comorbidities. Epidemiological evidence shows gender disparities in COVID-19 severity and fatality, with non-menopausal females having milder severity and better outcomes than age-matched males. However, the difference vanishes when comparing postmenopausal women with age-matched men. It has been suggested that, to some extent, this is due to the protective role of female hormones, such as anti-Müllerian hormone and oestradiol (E2), in non-menopausal women. Oestrogens have been hypothesized to be crucial in modulating viral infection and the progression of the disease via an action on immune/inflammatory responses and angiotensin-converting enzyme type 2 expression. Hence, the most likely explanation is that, because the levels of oestrogen in females after menopause decrease, oestrogen no longer offers a beneficial effect as seen in younger females. The COVID-19 pandemic has highlighted the serious negative effects arising from the state of E2 deficiency. Therefore, hormone replacement therapy gains further support as the damaging effect of the decline in ovarian function affects many biological systems, and recently with the COVID-19 pandemic, oestrogen's vital role within the immune system has become quite clear. However, additional clinical investigations regarding hormone replacement therapy are urgently needed to further verify the protective and therapeutic effects of E2 on menopausal women with COVID-19.

Sex hormones and immune system: Menopausal hormone therapy in the context of COVID-19 pandemic

The fatal outcomes of COVID-19 are related to the high reactivity of the innate wing of immunity. Estrogens could exert anti-inflammatory effects during SARS-CoV-2 infection at different stages: from increasing the antiviral resistance of individual cells to counteracting the pro-inflammatory cytokine production. A complex relationship between sex hormones and immune system implies that menopausal hormone therapy (MHT) has pleiotropic effects on immunity in peri- and postmenopausal patients. The definite immunological benefits of perimenopausal MHT confirm the important role of estrogens in regulation of immune functionalities. In this review, we attempt to explore how sex hormones and MHT affect immunological parameters of the organism at different level (in vitro, in vivo) and what mechanisms are involved in their protective response to the new coronavirus infection. The correlation of sex steroid levels with severity and lethality of the disease indicates the potential of using hormone therapy to modulate the immune response and increase the resilience to adverse outcomes. The overall success of MHT is based on decades of experience in clinical trials. According to the current standards, MHT should not be discontinued in COVID-19 with the exception of critical cases.

Are sex hormones promising candidates to explain sex disparities in the COVID-19 pandemic?

Emerging evidence suggests that the novel Coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) is deadlier for men than women both in China and in Europe. Male sex is a risk factor for COVID-19 mortality. The meccanisms underlying the reduced morbidity and lethality in women are currently unclear, even though hypotheses have been posed (Brandi and Giustina in Trends Endocrinol Metab. 31:918-27, 2020). This article aims to describe the role of sex hormones in sex- and gender-related fatality of COVID-19. We discuss the possibility that potential sex-specific mechanisms modulating the course of the disease include both the androgen- and the estrogen-response cascade. Sex hormones regulate the respiratory function, the innate and adaptive immune responses, the immunoaging, the cardiovascular system, and the entrance of the virus in the cells. Recommendations for the future government policies and for the management of COVID-19 patients should include a dimorphic approach for males and females. As the estrogen receptor signaling appears critical for protection in women, more studies are needed to translate the basic knowledge into clinical actions. Understanding the etiological bases of sexual dimorphism in COVID-19 could help develop more effective strategies in individual patients in both sexes, including designing a good vaccine.

Sexual dimorphism in COVID-19: potential clinical and public health implications

Current evidence suggests that severity and mortality of COVID-19 is higher in men than in women, whereas women might be at increased risk of COVID-19 reinfection and development of long COVID. Differences between sexes have been observed in other infectious diseases and in the response to vaccines. Sex-specific expression patterns of proteins mediating virus binding and entry, and divergent reactions of the immune and endocrine system, in particular the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis, in response to acute stress might explain the higher severity of COVID-19 in men. In this Personal View, we discuss how sex hormones, comorbidities, and the sex chromosome complement influence these mechanisms in the context of COVID-19. Due to its role in the severity and progression of SARS-CoV-2 infections, we argue that sexual dimorphism has potential implications for disease treatment, public health measures, and follow-up of patients predisposed to the development of long COVID. We suggest that sex differences could be considered in future pandemic surveillance and treatment of patients with COVID-19 to help to achieve better disease stratification and improved outcomes.

The effect of interleukin-6 level at the time of hospitalisation on erectile functions in hospitalised patients with COVID-19

We evaluated the relationship between erectile dysfunction (ED) and IL-6 levels in males with COVID-19. The study included 80 male patients aged 30-45 years who were hospitalised due to COVID-19. The International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-5) questionnaire was used to assess erectile function. The IIEF-5 questionnaire was re-administered at a 3-month control visit after discharge, and the change score from baseline was recorded. The patients were divided into three groups according to the IIEF-5 score at 3 months as Group 1 (severe ED), Group 2 (moderate ED) and Group 3 (no ED), and into two groups according to IL-6 level at the time of admission as Group A (IL-6 ≤ 50 ng/ml) and Group B (IL-6 > 50 ng/ml). The change in the IIEF-5 score (p < .001) was significantly greater in Group B than in Group A. There was also significant difference in IL-6 between Group 1 and Group 2 (p = .008). The correlation analysis revealed a moderate correlation between IL-6 level and the change in IIEF-5 score and D-dimer level (r:0.529, p < .001) and a weak correlation between IL-6 level and FSH (r:0.309, p = .005). The present study suggests that elevated IL-6 levels in male patients hospitalised due to COVID-19 might be related to the risk of developing ED.

COVID-19 Vaccination for Endocrine Patients: A Position Statement from the Korean Endocrine Society

Since the first outbreak of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), ongoing efforts have been made to discover an efficacious vaccine against COVID-19 to combat the pandemic. In most countries, both mRNA and DNA vaccines have been administered, and their side effects have also been reported. The clinical course of COVID-19 and the effects of vaccination against COVID-19 are both influenced by patients' health status and involve a systemic physiological response. In view of the systemic function of endocrine hormones, endocrine disorders themselves and the therapeutics used to treat them can influence the outcomes of vaccination for COVID-19. However, there are very limited data to support the development of clinical guidelines for patients with specific medical backgrounds based on large clinical trials. In the current severe circumstances of the COVID-19 pandemic, position statements made by clinical specialists are essential to provide appropriate recommendations based on both medical evidence and clinical experiences. As endocrinologists, we would like to present the medical background of COVID-19 vaccination, as well as precautions to prevent the side effects of COVID-19 vaccination in patients with specific endocrine disorders, including adrenal insufficiency, diabetes mellitus, osteoporosis, autoimmune thyroid disease, hypogonadism, and pituitary disorders.

[COVID-19 from the perspective of a gynecological endocrinologist]

Die von SARS-CoV‑2 („severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2“) ausgelöste infektiöse Atemwegserkrankung COVID-19 („coronavirus disease 2019“) weist in ihrem Verlauf und Schweregrad eine deutliche Abhängigkeit vom Geschlecht der Erkrankten auf. So ist die Inzidenzrate bei Frauen höher als bei Männern, während bei Männern schwere Verlaufsformen erheblich häufiger zu beobachten sind und die Mortalitätsrate bei ihnen signifikant höher ist. Allerdings unterscheiden sich wiederum prämenopausale und postmenopausale Frauen hinsichtlich des Verlaufs. Prämenopausale Frauen müssen seltener hospitalisiert werden und bedürfen seltener maschineller Beatmung. Postmenopausale Frauen, die eine Hormonersatztherapie erhalten, scheinen davon zu profitieren. Ergebnisse der Grundlagenforschung am Mausmodell zeigen, dass die weiblichen Sexualsteroide im Falle der Influenza den Entzündungsverlauf positiv beeinflussen bzw. im Falle von SARS-CoV‑2 die Empfänglichkeit gegenüber dem Virus herabsenken, während Androgene eine Erhöhung der Infektionsrate zur Folge haben. Dies gilt auch für Patientinnen mit polyzystischem Ovarsyndrom. Erste Ergebnisse von Therapiestudie mit Progesteron – wenngleich mit kleinen Patientenzahlen – weisen darauf hin, dass eine Therapie mit diesem Sexualsteroid sich positiv auf den Krankheitsverlauf bei betroffenen Männern auswirken kann. Allerdings zeigt auch die Verteilung der Komplikationen im Zusammenhang mit der Impfung gegen COVID-19 eine deutliche Geschlechterdifferenz, hier mit einem höheren relativen Risiko für jüngere Frauen.