Role of core needle biopsy as a first-line diagnostic tool for thyroid nodules: a retrospective cohort study

Superior Diagnostic Yield of Core Needle Biopsy Over Fine Needle Aspiration in Diagnosing Follicular-Patterned Neoplasms: A Multicenter Study Focusing on Bethesda IV Results

OBJECTIVE

To compare the diagnostic outcomes of core needle biopsy (CNB) and fine-needle aspiration (FNA) using Bethesda IV as a test-positive criterion for diagnosing follicular-patterned neoplasms in a large multicenter cohort.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective study included 5463 thyroid nodules ≥1 cm from 4883 patients (4019 females, 864 males; mean age 53.8 years) that underwent FNA or CNB across 26 hospitals in Korea between June and September 2015. The final diagnosis in cases diagnosed as Bethesda IV (follicular neoplasm) in biopsies were confirmed by surgical pathology. The primary study outcome was the diagnostic yield, defined as the proportion of nodules with follicular-patterned neoplasms confirmed at surgery after receiving Bethesda IV results on biopsy (FNA or CNB), among all that underwent biopsy. Secondary outcomes included false referral rate (FRR) and positive predictive value (PPV). All nodules were analyzed before matching (823 and 4640 nodules for CNB and FNA, respectively) and after nodule matching in a 1:2 ratio (799 and 1571 nodules, respectively) according to age, sex, nodule size, and Korean Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System (K-TIRADS) category. Additionally, the diagnostic yields of various histological subtypes of follicular-patterned neoplasms and nodule subgroups were analyzed.

RESULTS

CNB demonstrated a significantly higher diagnostic yield than FNA both before (9.0% vs. 0.5%; P < 0.001) and after matching (9.0% vs. 0.6%; P < 0.001). CNB consistently had higher diagnostic yields than FNA for most histological subtypes and all subgroups. FRR was not significantly different between the CNB and FNA groups after matching (0.4% vs. 0.1%; P = 0.337). The PPV was consistently greater than 90% for both methods, with no significant difference.

CONCLUSION

CNB had a higher diagnostic yield than FNA for follicular-patterned neoplasms, with no significant difference in FRR using Bethesda IV as the test-positive criterion.

A comparative analysis of core needle biopsy and repeat fine needle aspiration in patients with inconclusive initial cytology of thyroid nodules

Purpose

To assess and compare the effectiveness of ultrasound-guided core needle biopsy (CNB) in comparison to repeat fine-needle aspiration(rFNA) for thyroid nodules that yield inconclusive results following the initial fine-needle aspiration (FNA).

Methods

A cohort of 471 patients who received an inconclusive cytological diagnosis following the initial FNA were included in this study. These patients subsequently underwent either CNB (n=242) or rFNA (n=229). The inconclusive FNA results encompassed categories I, III, and IV of The Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology(TBSRTC), as well as the ultrasound images indicating malignancy despite FNA results falling under TBSRTC category II. This study assessed the sampling satisfaction rate, diagnostic efficacy, and complications associated with CNB compared to rFNA. Additionally, the impact of repeat puncture time and nodule size on diagnostic efficacy was analyzed.

Results

Following repeat punctures, the satisfaction rate of the CNB sampling was found to be significantly higher than that of rFNA (83.9% vs 66.8%). The diagnostic rate in the CNB group was significantly greater compared to that of the rFNA group (70.7% vs 35.8%). In patients with nodule maximum diameters ranging from 5 mm to 20 mm, the diagnostic accuracy was significantly higher in the CNB group compared to that in the rFNA group. In patients with intervals less than 90 days, between 90 days and one year, the diagnostic rate in the CNB group was found to be higher compared to that in the rFNA group. In CNB, not immediately adjacent to the capsule was a risk factor for nodular puncture bleeding (37.0% vs 22.7%.).

Conclusion

CNB demonstrated higher rates of satisfaction and diagnosis compared to the rFNA. The diagnostic effectiveness of CNB was not influenced by the time interval or the size of the thyroid nodule. Therefore, in cases where the initial FNA diagnosis of thyroid nodules is inconclusive, CNB should be considered as a viable option for re-puncture.

Reevaluating diagnostic categories and associated malignancy risks in thyroid core needle biopsy

As the application of core needle biopsy (CNB) in evaluating thyroid nodules rises in clinical practice, the 2023 Korean Thyroid Association Management Guidelines for Patients with Thyroid Nodules have officially recognized its value for the first time. CNB procures tissue samples preserving both histologic structure and cytologic detail, thereby supplying substantial material for an accurate diagnosis and reducing the necessity for repeated biopsies or subsequent surgical interventions. The current review introduces the risk of malignancy within distinct diagnostic categories, emphasizing the implications of noninvasive follicular thyroid neoplasm with papillary-like nuclear features on these malignancy risks. Prior research has indicated diagnostic challenges associated with follicular-patterned lesions, resulting in notable variation within indeterminate diagnostic categories. The utilization of mutation-specific immunostaining in CNB enhances the accuracy of lesion classification. This review underlines the essential role of a multidisciplinary approach in diagnosing follicular-patterned lesions and the potential of mutation-specific immunostaining to strengthen diagnostic consensus and inform patient management decisions.

Clinical application of ultrasound-guided Core Needle Biopsy Histology and Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology in Cervical Lymph Nodes

Objectives

To investigate the difference of application of core needle biopsy histology and fine needle aspiration cytology in cervical lymphadenopathy.

Methods

A retrospective analysis was made on 80 patients with cervical lymphadenopathy admitted to Baoding No.1 Central Hospital from to October 2018 to February 2020, and they were randomly divided into two groups: core needle group and fine needle group. Patients in the core needle group were given core needle biopsy histology, while those in the fine needle group were given fine needle aspiration cytology, and the puncture results and surgical complications were compared between the two groups.

Results

The accuracy rates of the core needle group and the fine needle group in the diagnosis of malignant cervical lymph nodes were 95.83% and 72.22% respectively, with a statistically significant difference (χ²=4.683, p=0.030). The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of the core needle group were 100.00%, 93.75%, 95.83% and 100.00% respectively, while those of the fine needle group were 86.67%, 90.00%, 86.67% and 90.00% respectively, with no statistically significant differences between the two groups (p>0.05). The complication rate in the core needle group was 22.50%, which was higher than the 5.00% in the fine needle group (χ²=5.165, p=0.023).

Conclusions

No significant difference was observed between core needle biopsy histology and fine needle aspiration cytology in diagnosing cervical lymphadenopathy, but the former has a high complication rate.

Combined fine-needle aspiration with core needle biopsy for assessing thyroid nodules: a more valuable diagnostic method?

PURPOSE

This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic value of combined fine-needle aspiration (FNA) with core needle biopsy (CNB) in thyroid nodules.

METHODS

FNA and CNB were performed simultaneously on 703 nodules. We compared the proportions of inconclusive results and the diagnostic performance for malignancy among FNA, CNB, and combined FNA/CNB for different nodule sizes.

RESULTS

Combined FNA/CNB showed lower proportions of inconclusive results than CNB for all nodules (2.8% vs. 5.7%, P<0.001), nodules ≤1.0 cm (4.9% vs. 7.3%, P=0.063), nodules >1.0 cm (2.0% vs. 5.0 %, P<0.001), nodules ≤1.5 cm (3.8% vs. 7.9 %, P<0.001), and nodules >1.5 cm (2.1% vs. 3.9 %, P=0.016). The sensitivity of combined FNA/CNB in predicting malignancy was significantly higher than that of CNB (89.0% vs. 80.0%, P<0.001) and FNA (89.0% vs. 58.1%, P<0.001) for all nodules. Within American College of Radiology Thyroid and Imaging Reporting and Data System grades 4-5, in the subgroup of nodules ≤1.5 cm, combined FNA/ CNB showed the best sensitivity in predicting malignancy (91.4%), significantly higher than that of CNB (81.0%, P<0.001) and FNA (57.8%, P<0.001). However, in the subgroup of nodules >1.5 cm, the difference between combined FNA/CNB and CNB was not significant (84.2% vs. 78.9%, P=0.500).

CONCLUSION

Regardless of nodule size, combined FNA/CNB tended to yield lower proportions of inconclusive results than CNB or FNA alone and exhibited higher performance in diagnosing malignancy. The combined FNA/CNB technique may be a more valuable diagnostic method for nodules ≤1.5 cm and nodules with a risk of malignancy than CNB and FNA alone.

Ultrasound features affecting the sample adequacy after fine-needle aspiration of thyroid nodules with different risk stratification

BACKGROUND

The inadequacy samples caused by the internal characteristic structure of thyroid nodules are difficult to be solved.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the ultrasound features affecting the sample adequacy after fine-needle aspiration (FNA) of thyroid nodules with different risk stratification.

METHODS

592 thyroid nodules that underwent ultrasound-guided FNA were included in this retrospective study. The sample obtained by FNA were classified as inadequacy and adequacy according to the cytopathological results. Ultrasound features (ie., size, position, cystic predominance, composition, echo, shape, margin, and superficial annular calcification status) of the nodules were recorded and compared between the inadequacy sample group and adequacy sample group.

RESULTS

Multiple logistic regression shows that preponderant cystic proportion (OR, 0.384; P = 0.041), extremely hypoechogenicity and hypoechogenicity (OR, 6.349; P = 0.006) were the independent influencing factors of inadequate samples after FNA in benign expected nodules. In addition, nodule size ≤10 mm (OR, 1.960; P = 0.010) and superficially annular calcification (OR, 4.600; P <  0.001) were independent influencing factors for inadequate samples after FNA in malignant expected nodules.

CONCLUSION

The ultrasound features of hypoechogenicity or high cystic proportion in benign expected nodules and that of small size or annular calcification in malignant expected nodules were the risk factors for inadequacy samples by US-guided FNA.

Improvement of Ultrasound Image Quality Using Non-Local Means Noise-Reduction Approach for Precise Quality Control and Accurate Diagnosis of Thyroid Nodules

This study aimed to improve the quality of ultrasound images by modeling an algorithm using a non-local means (NLM) noise-reduction approach to achieve precise quality control and accurate diagnosis of thyroid nodules. An ATS-539 multipurpose phantom was used to scan the dynamic range and gray-scale measurement regions, which are most closely related to the noise level. A convex-type 3.5-MHz frequency probe is used for scanning according to ATS regulations. In addition, ultrasound images of human thyroid nodules were obtained using a linear probe. An algorithm based on the NLM noise-reduction approach was modeled based on the intensity and relative distance of adjacent pixels in the image, and conventional filtering methods for image quality improvement were designed as a comparison group. When the NLM algorithm was applied to the image, the contrast-to-noise ratio and coefficient of variation values improved by 28.62% and 19.54 times, respectively, compared with those of the noisy images. In addition, the image improvement efficiency of the NLM algorithm was superior to that of conventional filtering methods. Finally, the applicability of the NLM algorithm to human thyroid images using a high-frequency linear probe was validated. We demonstrated the efficiency of the proposed algorithm in ultrasound images and the possibility of capturing improved images in the dynamic range and gray-scale region for quality control parameters.

Analysis of the influencing factors on fine-needle aspiration biopsy results of the thyroid

Objective

The objective of the study is to analyze the influencing factors on the results of thyroid fine-needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB).

Method

A total of 339 patients who underwent FNAB in our hospital from December 2018 to July 2021 were retrospectively selected. The patients were chosen according to the gender ratio, age, and thyroid ultrasound characteristics and were divided into three groups: (1) a 22G needle vacuum aspiration group (Group 1, n = 85), (2) a 22G biopsy needle non-vacuum aspiration group (Group 2, n = 50), and (3) a 25G biopsy needle non-vacuum aspiration group (Group 3, n = 204). Patients in these groups were evaluated for determining the FNAB dissatisfaction rate of pathological samples. A bivariate regression analysis of independent risk factors related to the unsatisfactory pathological diagnosis of samples was performed.

Results

The specimen dissatisfaction rates of the three groups were 22/85 (25.9%), 15/50 (30%), and 18/186 (9.7%), respectively. The overall sample dissatisfaction rate was 55/339 (16.2%), and the sample satisfaction rate of Group 3 was higher than that of Groups 1 and 2 (P < 0.05). Logistic bivariate regression analysis showed that the age of the patients and the capillary sampling needles and aspiration methods were two independent risk factors for determining the dissatisfaction rate of FNAB pathological samples.

Conclusion

A 25G capillary sampling aspiration biopsy needle was selected to perform FNAB in thyroid nodules without vacuum aspiration, which could effectively improve the accuracy of FNAB results with a high specimen satisfaction rate.

Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology vs. Core Needle Biopsy for Thyroid Nodules: A Prospective, Experimental Study Using Surgical Specimen

PURPOSE

To evaluate and compare the diagnostic outcomes of ultrasonography (US)-guided fine needle aspiration (FNA) and core needle biopsy (CNB) performed on the same thyroid nodule using a surgical specimen for direct comparison.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We included 89 thyroid nodules from 88 patients from February 2015 to January 2016. The inclusion criterion was thyroid nodules measuring ≥ 20 mm (mean size: 40.0 ± 15.3 mm). Immediately after surgical resection, FNA and subsequent CNB were performed on the surgical specimen under US guidance. FNA and CNB cytopathologic results on the specimen were compared with the surgical diagnosis.

RESULTS

Among the 89 nodules, 30 were malignant and 59 were benign. Significantly higher inconclusive rates were seen in FNA for malignant than benign nodules (80.0% vs. 39.0%, p < 0.001). For CNB, conclusive and inconclusive rates did not differ between benign and malignant nodules (p = 0.796). Higher inconclusive rates were seen for FNA among cancers regardless of US features, and in the subgroup of size ≥ 40 mm (62.5% vs. 22.9%, p = 0.028). Eleven cancers were diagnosed with CNB (36.7%, 11/30), while none was diagnosed using FNA.

CONCLUSION

In this experimental study using surgical specimens, CNB showed a potential to provide improved diagnostic sensitivity for thyroid cancer, especially when a conclusive diagnosis is limited with FNA.

Diagnostic efficacy, performance and safety of side-cut core needle biopsy for thyroid nodules: comparison of automated and semi-automated biopsy needles

PURPOSE

This study was performed to compare the utility of the semi-automated and automated side-cut core biopsy needles for thyroid nodules.

METHODS

Between January 2014 and March 2020, biopsy was performed for 278 thyroid nodules using the semi-automated core needle and for 225 nodules using the automated core needle. Nondiagnostic rate, inconclusive rate, diagnostic performance and complication rates were evaluated and compared between two core needle types.

RESULTS

There were 1.2% (6/503) nondiagnostic results and 15.9% (80/503) inconclusive results. Nondiagnostic rate between two needle types was not significantly different. The semi-automated type (33/278, 11.9%) showed lower inconclusive rate than the automated type (47/225, 20.9%) (p = 0.006). The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV and diagnostic accuracy for diagnosis of malignancy of the semi-automated type were 70.18, 100, 100, 84.96 and 88.89%, respectively; the corresponding rates of automated type were 70.45, 100, 100, 86.6, and 89.84%. There were 12 minor complications: four hematomas (4/278, 1.4%) for the semi-automated type and eight hematomas (8/225, 3.6%) for the automated type, which difference was not statistically significant.

CONCLUSION

Core needle biopsy for thyroid nodules using either the semi-automated or automated needle is a safe diagnostic tool. Semi-automated needle has lower inconclusive rate than automated needle.

Diagnostic Efficacy and Safety of Core Needle Biopsy as a First-Line Diagnostic Method for Thyroid Nodules: A Prospective Cohort Study

Background: The diagnostic role of ultrasonography (US)-guided core needle biopsy (CNB) as a first-line diagnostic method for thyroid nodules remains controversial. This study was performed to determine the diagnostic efficacy and safety of CNB as a first-line diagnostic method for thyroid nodules. Methods: From February 2016 to January 2018, CNB was prospectively performed by an experienced radiologist in all consecutive patients with thyroid nodules indicated for fine-needle aspiration (FNA). Three patients refused this protocol. Finally, 212 consecutive patients with 248 thyroid nodules were enrolled in this prospective study. Combined CNB/FNA was selectively performed in 43 patients. The diagnostic efficacy of CNB was evaluated by the rate of inconclusive results (nondiagnostic or indeterminate results), and its feasibility was estimated by calculating the successful biopsy rate and by measuring the procedure time from the time of the initial skin puncture to the last withdrawal of the biopsy needle from the skin. The safety of the procedure was evaluated by the major and minor complication rates. A US evaluation was performed before and after manual self-compression to assess for hemorrhage at the biopsy site, and delayed complications were assessed 5-7 days after the biopsy. Any hemorrhage that did not require hospitalization was classified as a minor complication. Results: CNB was performed once (n = 125, 50.4%), twice (n = 122, 49.2%), or three times (n = 1, 0.4%) per nodule. The diagnostic results of CNB were as follows: nondiagnostic (0.8%), benign (63.3%), indeterminate (10.1%), follicular neoplasm (3.2%), suspected malignancy (2.4%), and malignancy (20.1%); the rate of inconclusive results was 10.9%. The successful biopsy rate of CNB was 100%, and the median procedure time was 102 seconds (interquartile range 51-181 seconds). There were no major or delayed complications. There were 6 cases (2.8%) of minor complications, which included 2 cases (0.9%) with symptomatic hematomas and 4 cases (1.9%) with asymptomatic small hematomas. Conclusion: The findings confirm that CNB is effective in reducing the rate of inconclusive results and it is safe. CNB may be used as an alternative first-line diagnostic method for thyroid nodules by an experienced operator.

Usage and Diagnostic Yield of Fine-Needle Aspiration Cytology and Core Needle Biopsy in Thyroid Nodules: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Literature Published by Korean Authors

Objectives

The usefulness of core needle biopsy (CNB) for the diagnosis of thyroid nodules remains controversial, and preferences vary across hospitals. The purpose of this study was to assess the actual use of CNB in Korea and to analyze the advantages and disadvantages of CNB through a systematic review and meta-analysis of papers published by Korean authors.

Methods

A meta-analysis of full-text publications published in English presenting data from Korea retrieved from the Embase literature database was performed.

Results

CNB led to a significantly lower proportion of non-diagnostic results than fine-needle aspiration (FNA). However, the frequency of atypia of undetermined significance/follicular lesion of undetermined significance (AUS/FLUS) did not decrease as a result of performing CNB in nodules with initial AUS/FLUS results, while it increased in consecutive cases. A subcategory analysis of AUS/FLUS showed that the increased frequency of AUS/FLUS findings on CNB was due to more frequent diagnoses of architectural atypia and follicular neoplasm, which resulted in a higher frequency of inconclusive findings in consecutive cases compared to FNA. Hospitals favoring CNB had a higher proportion of AUS/FLUS diagnoses. Although the complication rate did not differ significantly between CNB and FNA, serious complications of CNB did occur.

Conclusion

A reduced frequency of non-diagnostic results may be a definite advantage of CNB over FNA. However, the increased frequency of diagnoses of architectural atypia and follicular neoplasm should be considered when selecting CNB as a diagnostic tool.

Assessing the diagnostic performance of thyroid biopsy with recommendations for appropriate interpretation

Purpose

The diagnostic performance of thyroid biopsy is influenced by several factors, including differences in the Bethesda categorization for malignancy, the inclusion or exclusion of non-diagnostic results, the definition used for the final diagnosis, and the definition of an inconclusive diagnosis. The purpose of this study was to provide an understanding of the factors influencing the diagnostic performance of thyroid biopsy.

Methods

We collected data retrospectively between January and December 2013 from a cohort of 6,762 thyroid nodules from 6,493 consecutive patients who underwent biopsy. In total, 4,822 nodules from 4,553 patients were included. We calculated the biopsy sensitivity according to the inclusion of different Bethesda categories in the numerator and the exclusion of non-diagnostic results, as well as the diagnostic accuracy according to different definitions of a benign diagnosis. We obtained the conclusive and inconclusive diagnosis rates.

Results

The sensitivity increased when more Bethesda categories were included in the numerator and when non-diagnostic results were excluded. When a benign thyroid nodule diagnosis was defined as benign findings on surgical resection, concordant benign results on at least two occasions, or an initial benign biopsy result and follow-up for more than 12 months, the accuracy was higher than when the diagnosis was based on surgical resection alone (91.1% vs. 68.7%). A higher conclusive diagnosis rate was obtained when Bethesda categories I and III were considered inconclusive than when Bethesda categories I, III and IV were considered inconclusive (78.3% vs. 72.8%, P<0.001).

Conclusion

Understanding the concepts presented herein is important in order to appropriately interpret the diagnostic performance of thyroid biopsy.

Whirling technique for thyroid fine needle aspiration biopsy: a preliminary study of effectiveness and safety

PURPOSE

This study was aimed to compare thyroid fine needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) techniques (conventional vs. whirling) in terms of cell harvesting ability ex vivo, the unsatisfactory rate and complication rate in vivo, and multi-operator performance in a phantom study.

METHODS

In the ex vivo study, cell counts per background at ×100 magnification were compared between both techniques. In the in vivo study, 70 patients who underwent whirling FNAB from July 2019 to November 2019 were retrospectively compared to 140 matched patients who underwent conventional FNAB from January 2018 to November 2019 regarding the unsatisfactory rate and complication rate. As a subgroup analysis, thyroid nodules in difficult biopsy situations (nodule diameter <10 mm and location within 3 mm from major anatomical structures) were compared. In the phantom study, eight operators with varying experience recorded levels of dexterity and needle tip visualization, and their preferences for both techniques.

RESULTS

In the ex vivo study, cell counts were comparable between both techniques in all thyroid nodule mimickers (80.0% vs. 87.5%, P=0.178). In the in vivo study, the unsatisfactory rate was comparable between the two groups (15.7% vs. 12.9%, P=0.859). In the subgroup analysis, the whirling technique demonstrated a lower unsatisfactory rate (5.9% vs. 24.2%, P=0.045) and a lower complication rate (0% vs. 6.1%, P=0.553). In the phantom study, the whirling technique demonstrated better dexterity and needle tip visualization and was preferred by all operators.

CONCLUSION

This newly proposed whirling technique for thyroid FNAB may be effective and safe, especially in difficult biopsy situations.

Core-Needle Biopsy Does Not Show Superior Diagnostic Performance to Fine-Needle Aspiration for Diagnosing Thyroid Nodules

PURPOSE

To compare the diagnostic performances of fine-needle aspiration (FNA) and core-needle biopsy (CNB) for thyroid nodules according to nodule size.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective study included 320 thyroid nodules from 320 patients who underwent both FNA and CNB at outside clinics and proceeded with surgery in our institution between July 2012 and May 2019. According to nodule size, the diagnostic performances of FNA and CNB were calculated using various combinations of test-negatives and test-positives defined by the Bethesda categories and were compared using the generalized estimated equation and the Delong method.

RESULTS

There were 279 malignant nodules in 279 patients and 41 benign nodules in 41 patients. The diagnostic performance of FNA was mostly not different from CNB regardless of nodule size, except for negative predictive value, which was better for FNA than CNB when applying Criteria 1 and 2. When applying Criteria 3, the specificity and positive predictive value of FNA were superior to CNB regardless of size. When applying Criteria 4, diagnostic performance did not differ between FNA and CNB regardless of size. After applying Criteria 5, diagnostic performance did not differ between FNA and CNB in nodules ≥2 cm. However, in nodules ≥1 cm and all nodules, the sensitivity, accuracy, and negative predictive value of CNB were better than those of FNA.

CONCLUSION

CNB did not show superior diagnostic performance to FNA for diagnosing thyroid nodules.

Distribution and malignancy risk of six categories of the pathology reporting system for thyroid core-needle biopsy in 1,216 consecutive thyroid nodules

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to present the distribution of lesions among the six categories of the pathology reporting system for thyroid core-needle biopsy (CNB), along with the range of malignancy risk of each category based on different diagnostic criteria for benignity in a clinical cohort.

METHODS

For 1,216 consecutive nodules (≥1 cm) of 1,125 patients who underwent CNB at two hospitals, the diagnostic results based on the six categories of thyroid CNB were analyzed. Patients were divided into three groups according to prior fine-needle aspiration (FNA) status: second-line CNB for nodules where prior FNA yielded nondiagnostic or unsatisfactory results (n=57), second-line CNB for nodules with prior FNA results of atypia/follicular lesion of undetermined significance (AUS/FLUS) (n=303), and first-line CNB (n=856).

RESULTS

The proportion of nodules in each CNB category and the range of the malignancy rate for each category was as follows, in order from category I to VI: 1.8%, 23.1%-75.0%; 57.9%, 0.7%-16.7%; 16.0%, 13.2%-46.7%; 8.8%, 53.8%-56.8%; 2.0%, 100%; and 13.5%, 100%. First-line CNB was associated with a higher rate of conclusive diagnoses (category II, IV, or VI) (725 of 856, 84.7%) than second-line CNB with prior nondiagnostic or AUS/FLUS FNA results (241 of 360, 66.9%; P<0.001).

CONCLUSION

The overall distribution of nodules across the six categories of thyroid CNB and the ranges of malignancy risk for those categories were presented in a clinical cohort. First-line CNB tended to produce a higher rate of conclusive results than second-line CNB with prior inconclusive FNA results.

2019 Practice guidelines for thyroid core needle biopsy: a report of the Clinical Practice Guidelines Development Committee of the Korean Thyroid Association

Ultrasound-guided core needle biopsy (CNB) has been increasingly used for the pre-operative diagnosis of thyroid nodules. Since the Korean Society of the Thyroid Radiology published the ‘Consensus Statement and Recommendations for Thyroid CNB’ in 2017 and the Korean Endocrine Pathology Thyroid CNB Study Group published ‘Pathology Reporting of Thyroid Core Needle Biopsy’ in 2015, advances have occurred rapidly not only in the management guidelines for thyroid nodules but also in the diagnostic terminology and classification schemes. The Clinical Practice Guidelines Development Committee of the Korean Thyroid Association (KTA) reviewed publications on thyroid CNB from 1995 to September 2019 and updated the recommendations and statements for the diagnosis and management of thyroid nodules using CNB. Recommendations for the resolution of clinical controversies regarding the use of CNB were based on expert opinion. These practical guidelines include recommendations and statements regarding indications for CNB, patient preparation, CNB technique, biopsy-related complications, biopsy specimen preparation and processing, and pathology interpretation and reporting of thyroid CNB.

Comparison of Diagnostic Accuracy of Thyroid Cancer With Ultrasound-Guided Fine-Needle Aspiration and Core-Needle Biopsy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the accuracy of fine-needle aspiration (FNA) and core-needle biopsy (CNB) in diagnosing thyroid cancer. The PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases were retrieved up to May 2019, and the overall accuracy of FNA and CNB in diagnosing thyroid cancer was evaluated by meta-analysis. The sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio (PLR), and negative likelihood ratio (NLR) were calculated. The summary receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was estimated, and the area under the ROC curve (AUC) was calculated. Ten eligible studies, involving 10,078 patients with 10,842 thyroid nodules, were included. The overall sensitivity and specificity of FNA and CNB for thyroid cancer were 0.72 [95 % confidence interval (CI): 0.69-0.74], 0.99 (95% CI: 0.98-0.99), and 0.83 (95% CI: 0.81-0.85), 0.99 (95% CI: 0.98-0.99), respectively. Other parameters used to assess efficacy included PLR 41.71 (2.15-808.27) and 51.56 (3.20-841.47), NLR 0.31 (0.22-0.42) and 0.22 (0.15-0.32), for FNA and CNB, respectively. Overall, the pooled summary ROC (AUC) value of FNA and CNB was 0.9025 and 0.7926, respectively. No significant difference was observed between the two AUCs of FNA and CNB (P = 0.164). FNA and CNB are still similar as first-line diagnostic tools. FNA remains a good first-line method for detecting thyroid malignancies.