Reliability of core needle biopsy as a second-line procedure in thyroid nodules with an indeterminate fine-needle aspiration report: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Core needle biopsy: an efficacious adjunct to cytological diagnosis in thyroid tumours suspected of anaplastic carcinoma - single-centre experience

Introduction

Ultrasound-guided fine- needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) remains the primary method for diagnosing thyroid nodules, providing adequate information for definitive diagnosis and treatment decisions in most cases. However, cytological examinations sometimes yield inconclusive or non-diagnostic results. For rapidly growing tumours with suspected malignancy, a swift and accurate diagnosis is crucial to initiate timely treatment. Cases suggestive of anaplastic thyroid cancer (ATC) or poorly differentiated cancer present unique challenges in obtaining satisfactory diagnostic material through FNAB, due to advanced necrosis or extensive inflammatory components. In these instances, core needle biopsy (CNB) emerges as a complementary diagnostic tool when FNAB results are ambiguous. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of CNB in diagnosing rapidly growing thyroid tumours with clinical indication of ATC.

Material and methods

Between 2019-2023, 31 CNBs were performed on large, rapidly expanding thyroid tumours.

Results

All cases exhibited clinical signs of malignancy, with previous FNAB outcomes being either equivocal or inconclusive. The subsequent CNBs demonstrated accurate results with minimal complications among the patients. While reservations about CNB for thyroid nodules persist, it offers a valuable diagnostic alternative, potentially preventing unwarranted surgical biopsy or removal of the thyroid.

Conclusions

Core needle biopsy deployment should be judicious, reserved for select cases, and carried out in a hospital environment to ensure diagnostic precision with the least risk of complications.

[SFE-AFCE-SFMN 2022 consensus on the management of thyroid nodules: Interest and place of thyroid cytology]

The SFE-AFCE-SFMN 2022 consensus deals with the management of thyroid nodules, a symptom that is a frequent reason for consultation in endocrinology. Thyroid nodules are very common and mostly benign. Thyroid ultrasound and thyroid fine-needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) are the reference tests for the analysis of these nodules. The aim of this article is to describe for the cytopathologist the key points of the SFE-AFCE-SFMN 2022 consensus involving thyroid cytology: the indications for thyroid FNAB, the technique and analysis, and the management (treatment, follow-up) following this cytological screening examination, a key element in the management of the thyroid nodule.

A comparative analysis of core needle biopsy and repeat fine needle aspiration in patients with inconclusive initial cytology of thyroid nodules

Purpose

To assess and compare the effectiveness of ultrasound-guided core needle biopsy (CNB) in comparison to repeat fine-needle aspiration(rFNA) for thyroid nodules that yield inconclusive results following the initial fine-needle aspiration (FNA).

Methods

A cohort of 471 patients who received an inconclusive cytological diagnosis following the initial FNA were included in this study. These patients subsequently underwent either CNB (n=242) or rFNA (n=229). The inconclusive FNA results encompassed categories I, III, and IV of The Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology(TBSRTC), as well as the ultrasound images indicating malignancy despite FNA results falling under TBSRTC category II. This study assessed the sampling satisfaction rate, diagnostic efficacy, and complications associated with CNB compared to rFNA. Additionally, the impact of repeat puncture time and nodule size on diagnostic efficacy was analyzed.

Results

Following repeat punctures, the satisfaction rate of the CNB sampling was found to be significantly higher than that of rFNA (83.9% vs 66.8%). The diagnostic rate in the CNB group was significantly greater compared to that of the rFNA group (70.7% vs 35.8%). In patients with nodule maximum diameters ranging from 5 mm to 20 mm, the diagnostic accuracy was significantly higher in the CNB group compared to that in the rFNA group. In patients with intervals less than 90 days, between 90 days and one year, the diagnostic rate in the CNB group was found to be higher compared to that in the rFNA group. In CNB, not immediately adjacent to the capsule was a risk factor for nodular puncture bleeding (37.0% vs 22.7%.).

Conclusion

CNB demonstrated higher rates of satisfaction and diagnosis compared to the rFNA. The diagnostic effectiveness of CNB was not influenced by the time interval or the size of the thyroid nodule. Therefore, in cases where the initial FNA diagnosis of thyroid nodules is inconclusive, CNB should be considered as a viable option for re-puncture.

SFE-AFCE-SFMN 2022 Consensus on the management of thyroid nodules : Recommendations in thyroid cytology: from technique to interpretation

The SFE-AFCE-SFMN 2022 consensus deals with the management of thyroid nodules, a condition that is a frequent reason for consultation in endocrinology. In more than 90% of cases, patients are euthyroid, with benign non-progressive nodules that do not warrant specific treatment. The clinician's objective is to detect malignant thyroid nodules at risk of recurrence and death, toxic nodules responsible for hyperthyroidism or compressive nodules warranting treatment. The diagnosis and treatment of thyroid nodules requires close collaboration between endocrinologists, nuclear medicine physicians and surgeons, but also involves other specialists. Therefore, this consensus statement was established jointly by 3 societies: the French Society of Endocrinology (SFE), French Association of Endocrine Surgery (AFCE) and French Society of Nuclear Medicine (SFMN); the various working groups included experts from other specialties (pathologists, radiologists, pediatricians, biologists, etc.). This section deals with the technique and interpretation of thyroid fine-needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB), a reference test for the analysis of thyroid nodules.

Diagnostic Performance of Four Ultrasound Risk Stratification Systems: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background: Several ultrasound (US)-based risk stratification systems have been increasingly used for the optimal management of thyroid nodules. However, there are considerable discrepancies across these systems. This study aimed to summarize and compare the category-based diagnostic performance in the detection of thyroid cancer of different US-based risk stratification systems from four societies: the American College of Radiology-Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System (ACR-TIRADS), the American Thyroid Association (ATA), the Korean Thyroid Association/Korean Society of Thyroid Radiology (KTA/KSThR; K-TIRADS), and the European Thyroid Association (EU-TIRADS). Methods: MEDLINE/PubMed and EMBASE databases were searched to identify original articles investigating the category-based diagnostic performance according to at least one of the following guidelines: ACR-TIRADS, ATA, K-TIRADS, and EU-TIRADS. Pooled sensitivity and specificity were calculated using a bivariate random-effects model. A subgroup analysis on nodules of 1 cm or larger and a meta-regression analysis to identify factors associated with the diagnostic performance were performed. Results: A total of 29 articles including 33,748 thyroid nodules met the eligibility criteria and were included in the analysis. For ACR-TIRADS, the pooled sensitivity and specificity were, respectively, 66% and 91% for category 5 and 95% and 55% for category 4 or 5. For ATA, the pooled sensitivity and specificity were, respectively, 74% and 88% for category 5 and 91% and 64% for category 4 or 5. For K-TIRADS, the pooled sensitivity and specificity were, respectively, 55% and 95% for category 5 and 89% and 64% for category 4 or 5. For EU-TIRADS, the pooled sensitivity and specificity were, respectively, 82% and 90% for category 5 and 96% and 52% for category 4 or 5. Study location, proportion of female patients and malignant nodules, and study design were associated with study heterogeneity. Conclusions: The overall diagnostic performance of the four US-based risk stratification systems was comparable.

Usage and Diagnostic Yield of Fine-Needle Aspiration Cytology and Core Needle Biopsy in Thyroid Nodules: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Literature Published by Korean Authors

Objectives

The usefulness of core needle biopsy (CNB) for the diagnosis of thyroid nodules remains controversial, and preferences vary across hospitals. The purpose of this study was to assess the actual use of CNB in Korea and to analyze the advantages and disadvantages of CNB through a systematic review and meta-analysis of papers published by Korean authors.

Methods

A meta-analysis of full-text publications published in English presenting data from Korea retrieved from the Embase literature database was performed.

Results

CNB led to a significantly lower proportion of non-diagnostic results than fine-needle aspiration (FNA). However, the frequency of atypia of undetermined significance/follicular lesion of undetermined significance (AUS/FLUS) did not decrease as a result of performing CNB in nodules with initial AUS/FLUS results, while it increased in consecutive cases. A subcategory analysis of AUS/FLUS showed that the increased frequency of AUS/FLUS findings on CNB was due to more frequent diagnoses of architectural atypia and follicular neoplasm, which resulted in a higher frequency of inconclusive findings in consecutive cases compared to FNA. Hospitals favoring CNB had a higher proportion of AUS/FLUS diagnoses. Although the complication rate did not differ significantly between CNB and FNA, serious complications of CNB did occur.

Conclusion

A reduced frequency of non-diagnostic results may be a definite advantage of CNB over FNA. However, the increased frequency of diagnoses of architectural atypia and follicular neoplasm should be considered when selecting CNB as a diagnostic tool.

Assessing the diagnostic performance of thyroid biopsy with recommendations for appropriate interpretation

Purpose

The diagnostic performance of thyroid biopsy is influenced by several factors, including differences in the Bethesda categorization for malignancy, the inclusion or exclusion of non-diagnostic results, the definition used for the final diagnosis, and the definition of an inconclusive diagnosis. The purpose of this study was to provide an understanding of the factors influencing the diagnostic performance of thyroid biopsy.

Methods

We collected data retrospectively between January and December 2013 from a cohort of 6,762 thyroid nodules from 6,493 consecutive patients who underwent biopsy. In total, 4,822 nodules from 4,553 patients were included. We calculated the biopsy sensitivity according to the inclusion of different Bethesda categories in the numerator and the exclusion of non-diagnostic results, as well as the diagnostic accuracy according to different definitions of a benign diagnosis. We obtained the conclusive and inconclusive diagnosis rates.

Results

The sensitivity increased when more Bethesda categories were included in the numerator and when non-diagnostic results were excluded. When a benign thyroid nodule diagnosis was defined as benign findings on surgical resection, concordant benign results on at least two occasions, or an initial benign biopsy result and follow-up for more than 12 months, the accuracy was higher than when the diagnosis was based on surgical resection alone (91.1% vs. 68.7%). A higher conclusive diagnosis rate was obtained when Bethesda categories I and III were considered inconclusive than when Bethesda categories I, III and IV were considered inconclusive (78.3% vs. 72.8%, P<0.001).

Conclusion

Understanding the concepts presented herein is important in order to appropriately interpret the diagnostic performance of thyroid biopsy.

Whirling technique for thyroid fine needle aspiration biopsy: a preliminary study of effectiveness and safety

PURPOSE

This study was aimed to compare thyroid fine needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) techniques (conventional vs. whirling) in terms of cell harvesting ability ex vivo, the unsatisfactory rate and complication rate in vivo, and multi-operator performance in a phantom study.

METHODS

In the ex vivo study, cell counts per background at ×100 magnification were compared between both techniques. In the in vivo study, 70 patients who underwent whirling FNAB from July 2019 to November 2019 were retrospectively compared to 140 matched patients who underwent conventional FNAB from January 2018 to November 2019 regarding the unsatisfactory rate and complication rate. As a subgroup analysis, thyroid nodules in difficult biopsy situations (nodule diameter <10 mm and location within 3 mm from major anatomical structures) were compared. In the phantom study, eight operators with varying experience recorded levels of dexterity and needle tip visualization, and their preferences for both techniques.

RESULTS

In the ex vivo study, cell counts were comparable between both techniques in all thyroid nodule mimickers (80.0% vs. 87.5%, P=0.178). In the in vivo study, the unsatisfactory rate was comparable between the two groups (15.7% vs. 12.9%, P=0.859). In the subgroup analysis, the whirling technique demonstrated a lower unsatisfactory rate (5.9% vs. 24.2%, P=0.045) and a lower complication rate (0% vs. 6.1%, P=0.553). In the phantom study, the whirling technique demonstrated better dexterity and needle tip visualization and was preferred by all operators.

CONCLUSION

This newly proposed whirling technique for thyroid FNAB may be effective and safe, especially in difficult biopsy situations.

Distribution and malignancy risk of six categories of the pathology reporting system for thyroid core-needle biopsy in 1,216 consecutive thyroid nodules

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to present the distribution of lesions among the six categories of the pathology reporting system for thyroid core-needle biopsy (CNB), along with the range of malignancy risk of each category based on different diagnostic criteria for benignity in a clinical cohort.

METHODS

For 1,216 consecutive nodules (≥1 cm) of 1,125 patients who underwent CNB at two hospitals, the diagnostic results based on the six categories of thyroid CNB were analyzed. Patients were divided into three groups according to prior fine-needle aspiration (FNA) status: second-line CNB for nodules where prior FNA yielded nondiagnostic or unsatisfactory results (n=57), second-line CNB for nodules with prior FNA results of atypia/follicular lesion of undetermined significance (AUS/FLUS) (n=303), and first-line CNB (n=856).

RESULTS

The proportion of nodules in each CNB category and the range of the malignancy rate for each category was as follows, in order from category I to VI: 1.8%, 23.1%-75.0%; 57.9%, 0.7%-16.7%; 16.0%, 13.2%-46.7%; 8.8%, 53.8%-56.8%; 2.0%, 100%; and 13.5%, 100%. First-line CNB was associated with a higher rate of conclusive diagnoses (category II, IV, or VI) (725 of 856, 84.7%) than second-line CNB with prior nondiagnostic or AUS/FLUS FNA results (241 of 360, 66.9%; P<0.001).

CONCLUSION

The overall distribution of nodules across the six categories of thyroid CNB and the ranges of malignancy risk for those categories were presented in a clinical cohort. First-line CNB tended to produce a higher rate of conclusive results than second-line CNB with prior inconclusive FNA results.

Core needle biopsy in the management of thyroid nodules with an indeterminate fine-needle aspiration report

Ultrasonography (US)-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) cytology is widely used but is limited due to its pathologically indeterminate results in diagnosing thyroid nodules. Recently, US-guided core-needle biopsy (CNB) was introduced as an effective and safe technique for diagnosing indeterminate thyroid nodules. Using CNB, information about architectural histologic structure such as nodule capsule or more immunochemical staining can be obtained which lead to a more accurate diagnosis. Up to 98% of indeterminate thyroid lesions can be classified as malignant or benign when CNB is used for follow-up analysis. Other evidences revealed the effectiveness of CNB in reducing inconclusive results and improving the diagnostic performance of thyroid nodules initially diagnosed as AUS/FLUS by FNAB. In this review, we investigate how to deal with indeterminate thyroid nodules diagnosed by FNAB and determine how CNB has a role in diagnosing these indeterminate thyroid nodules.