Full-Body Radiographic Analysis of Postoperative Deviations From Age-Adjusted Alignment Goals in Adult Spinal Deformity Correction and Related Compensatory Recruitment

Revision surgery for proximal junctional failure: A single-center analysis

BACKGROUND

Proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK) is a radiographic complication following adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery due to degeneration of mobile segments adjacent to fused spine. Proximal junctional failure (PJF) represents PJK with structural failure, neurologic deficit, or mechanical instability warranting revision with extension of fusion above the uppermost instrumented vertebra (UIV). This study investigates the clinical presentation, mechanisms of failure, revision strategies, and outcomes for ASD patients who develop PJF after instrumented fusion to the pelvis.

METHODS

Fifty-four ASD patients who developed PJF after a posterior instrumented fusion to the pelvis at a single institution from 2009 to 2021 were analyzed. PJF was defined by radiographic PJK with (1) UIV or UIV+1 fracture, UIV screw pullout, or soft-tissue posterior ligamentous disruption, and (2) neurological deficit at presentation.

RESULTS

The cohort was stratified into upper thoracic (UT, 10 patients, T2-T6), lower thoracic (LT, 35 patients, T8-T11), and lumbar (L, 9 patients, L1-L3) spine UIV groups based on index surgery. Patients developed PJF at a median of 14 months (mean 18 ± 16, range: 1-78) after their index surgery. Neurological deficits at presentation included radiculopathy (61 %), myelopathy (48 %), motor deficits (33 %), and bowel or bladder incontinence (9 %). Mechanisms of PJF were vertebral fracture and screw pullout (UT: 50 %, LT: 80 %, L: 89 %, P < 0.001) or soft-tissue disruption (UT: 50 %, LT: 20 %, L: 11 %, P = 0.089) at the UIV. Revision surgery commonly involved posterior column osteotomies (63 %) rather than three-column osteotomies (9 %). Of patients in the UT group, 40 % were extended above the cervicothoracic junction. In the LT and L groups, 91 % and 89 % of patients were extended to the UT and LT spine, respectively. Median follow-up for the cohort after revision for PJF was 24 months (range: 2-89). A total of 26 patients (48 %) required a second revision surgery (median 14 months, range: 1-50), 16 of whom (28 %) were revised for recurrent PJF. Patient-specific and radiographic risk factors for recurrent PJF could not be elucidated.

CONCLUSION

In this series of ASD patients, after revision for PJF, recurrent PJF was the most common complication requiring another revision. Junctional failures tended to be vertebral body fracture and screw pullout in the LT and L spine and soft tissue disruption in the UT spine. Most revisions involved posterior column osteotomies with proximal extension across the thoracolumbar junction or apex of thoracic kyphosis (e.g., L to LT, LT to UT); notably, nearly half of UT failures were not extended to the cervical spine. Future research is warranted to elucidate risk factors for recurrent PJF and potential preventative strategies.

Ideal Lumbar Lordosis Correction in Patients With Adult Spinal Deformity Without Adversely Impacting Pelvic Tilt and Pelvic Incidence Minus Lumbar Lordosis: A Study of 426 Cases

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective study.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the ideal pelvic incidence (PI)-lumbar lordosis (LL) range to prevent pelvic tilt (PT) undercorrection while avoiding PI-LL overcorrection following adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND

PI-LL and PT are the important sagittal parameters to be restored to an adequate range by surgery. Ideal PI-LL target without causing PI-LL overcorrection and PT undercorrection has not been documented.

METHODS

We included patients with ASD undergoing ≥5-level fusion, including the sacrum. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed to calculate the lower limit of the ideal PI-LL without causing PI-LL overcorrection and the upper limit of the ideal PI-LL without causing PT undercorrection. The calculated ideal PI-LL was validated in terms of proximal junctional kyphosis and failure (PJK and PJF) rates and clinical outcomes. Analyses were performed according to age subgroups (below 70 and 70 yr or above).

RESULTS

In total, 426 patients were included in the study. Female patients were predominant (85.4%), with a mean age of 69.8 years. The lower limits of PI-LL were calculated as 4.9° for all patients, 2.3° for patients aged below 70 years, and 7.9° for patients aged 70 years or above. Meanwhile, the upper limits of PI-LL were calculated as 12.7° for all patients, 12.5° for patients aged below 70 years, and 13.3° for patients aged 70 years or above. There were no significant differences in the PJK and PJF rates among the new three PI-LL groups. Clinical outcomes were significantly better in patients with the ideal PI-LL group than those in patients with overcorrection or undercorrection groups for all age groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The ideal PI-LL correction target without adversely impacting PT and PI-LL was calculated at 2.3° to 12.5° for patients aged below 70 years and 7.9° to 13.3° for patients aged 70 years or above. These guideline parameters may help ensure optimal clinical outcomes without increasing the risk of PJK/F.

Evaluation of Discrepancy Between Radiographic Success and Patient Satisfaction in Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Considering the high surgical invasiveness of adult spinal deformity surgery, patient-perceived satisfaction may not necessarily follow good radiographic results. This study investigated the incidence and risk factors for the discrepancy between radiographic success and patient satisfaction after adult spinal deformity surgery.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 195 patients (mean age, 68.3 years) who underwent ≥4 level fusion surgery including the pelvis and achieved radiographic success as assessed by surgeons (that is, optimal alignment, no mechanical complications, and no revision surgery). The patients were divided into two groups according to Scoliosis Research Society (SRS)-22 satisfaction scores: less satisfied (score <4.0) and highly satisfied (score ≥4.0) groups. Preoperative and postoperative 2-year clinical and radiographic variables were analyzed to predict the lower satisfaction.

RESULTS

The clinical outcomes, including visual analogue scale, SRS-22, and Shor Form (SF)-36, significantly improved postoperatively, while modified lumbar stiffness disability index (M-LSDI) significantly worsened postoperatively. In bivariate comparisons, the total fusion length was significantly greater in the less satisfied group than in the highly satisfied group (6.9 vs 6.1). Preoperative and 2-year postoperative radiographic parameters were comparable between the groups. The preoperative SF-36 mental component score, 2-year visual analogue scale, 2-year Oswestry disability index, 2-year SRS-22, 2-year SF-36, and 2-year M-LSDI scores were significantly worse in the less satisfied group than in the highly satisfied group. The multivariate regression analysis revealed that the 2-year M-LSDI score was a single independent risk factor for less satisfaction (odds ratio = 1.290, 95% CI = 1.032-1.611, P = .025).

CONCLUSION

A sizable proportion (24.1%) of patients were dissatisfied with the surgical outcomes despite satisfactory radiographic results. Although the patients benefited from surgery for pain and functional improvement, postoperative lumbar stiffness-related functional disabilities adversely affected patient satisfaction. Therefore, before deciding on surgical treatment, patients should be fully informed of this trade-off between pain/disability and lumbar stiffness.

Influence of postoperative coronal malalignment following long-instrumented fusion in patients with adult spinal deformity: evaluation of clinical outcomes and mechanical complications

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Achieving satisfactory sagittal alignment in patients with adult spinal deformity (ASD) is a major goal of deformity correction, which leads to high health-related quality. However, compared with the literature on sagittal alignment, studies on postoperative coronal malalignment in ASD are limited.

PURPOSE

This study aimed to investigate the impact of coronal malalignment on clinical outcomes and mechanical complications after corrective surgery for ASD.

STUDY DESIGN/SETTING

Retrospective observational study PATIENT SAMPLE: Among patients who underwent deformity correction with ≥5-level fusion to the sacrum, this study focused on those who achieved optimal sagittal correction, defined as a pelvic incidence minus lumbar lordosis (PI-LL) of ≤10° postoperatively.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Incidence of coronal malalignment; clinical outcomes using the visual analog scale (VAS), Oswestry disability index (ODI), and Scoliosis Research Society Outcomes Questionnaire-22 (SRS-22); and mechanical complications such as proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK), proximal junctional failure (PJF), and rod fracture.

METHODS

Coronal malalignment was evaluated using the coronal balance distance (CBD), defined as the horizontal distance between the C7 plumb line and the central sacral vertical line. Postoperative coronal malalignment was classified as CBD > 3 cm. Patients were divided into two groups based on CBD as follows: the coronal balance (CB) group (balanced, CBD < 3 cm) and the coronal imbalance (CI) group (imbalanced, CBD ≥ 3 cm). Clinical outcomes and the incidence of mechanical complications were compared between the groups.

RESULTS

This study included 112 patients, with a mean follow-up duration of 46.8 months. Among them, 24 patients (21.4%) were included in the CI group, with a mean CBD of 3.6 ± 0.4 cm, whereas 88 patients comprised the CB group, with a mean CBD of 1.1 ± 0.7 cm. The back pain VAS scores indicated that the CI group had significantly worse clinical outcomes than the CB group (52.5 ± 19.8 vs. 40.1 ± 24.0, p = 0.022). The appearance domain of the SRS-22 was also significantly lower in the CI group than in the CB group (2.8 ± 0.6 vs. 3.4 ± 0.9, p = 0.002). However, no significant differences in leg pain VAS scores, ODI scores, or other SRS-22 domains, except appearance, were observed between the two groups. The incidences of PJK, PJF, and rod fractures were similar between the groups. However, the rate of revision surgery for rod fractures was significantly higher in the CI group than in the CB group (5/5 in the CI group vs. 5/29 in the CB group, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

After correction surgery for ASD, coronal malalignment demonstrated an association with increased back pain VAS scores and lower appearance scores on the SRS-22. The incidence of mechanical complications, including PJK, PJF, and rod fractures, was not influenced by coronal alignment. However, coronal malalignment significantly increased the risk of revision surgery for rod fractures.

Redefining physiological whole-body alignment according to pelvic incidence: normative values and prediction models

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Spinopelvic alignment assessment needs to account for pelvic incidence (PI).

PURPOSE

This study aimed at providing normative values for commonly used parameters in whole-body alignment analysis based on PI.

DESIGN

Multicentric prospective study.

PATIENT SAMPLE

This study included healthy volunteers with full-body biplanar radiograph in free-standing position.

OUTCOME MEASURES

All radiographic data were collected from 3D reconstructions: Sagittal vertical axis (SVA), T1 pelvic angle (TPA), spino-sacral angle (SSA), sagittal odontoid-hip axis angle (ODHA), pelvic parameters, sacro-femoral angle (SFA), knee flexion angle (KFA), ankle flexion angle (AA), Pelvic shift (PSh), lumbar lordosis (LL), thoracic kyphosis (TK) and cervical lordosis (CL).

METHODS

Population was divided into five groups according to PI. Normative values were described for each group. Linear regressions including age and PI provided prediction formulas for PT, TPA, SSA and SFA.

RESULTS

642 subjects were included. Mean age was 37.7 ± 16.3 years (range: 18-90). Mean PI in the cohort was 49.3 ± 9.5°. LL, PT, SFA, SSA and TPA correlated with PI and age. ODHA, TK, CL and the other lower limb parameters were not associated with PI. All normative values across PI groups are provided for segmental, regional and global alignment parameters. Prediction formulas were: PT=-12.7 + 0.38*PI + 0.14*Age, TPA=-16.9 + 0.34*PI + 0.15*Age, SSA = 109.8 + 0.58*PI-0.19*Age, and SFA = 173 + 0.39*PI + 0.11*Age.

CONCLUSIONS

SSA, PT, TPA and SFA must be assessed according to patient's PI. This study provides normative values for each PI group, and predictive formulas taking age and PI into account. PI cannot be used to define thoracic and cervical curvatures.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

II.

Relationship of T10-Pelvic Angle With Conventional Sagittal Parameters and Legacy Alignment Schemes in Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery

Study DesignRetrospective analysis.ObjectiveTo investigate the relationship of T10-pelvic angle (T10PA) with conventional sagittal parameters and legacy alignment schemes.Summary of Background DataT10PA is a newly introduced sagittal parameter to predict the development of proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK). However, its relationship with conventional sagittal parameters and legacy alignment schemes remains unknown.MethodsPatients with fusion from the pelvis to the upper-instrumented vertebra at or above the T10 were included. Based on the 6-week T10PA, the patients were divided into 3 groups as follows: undercorrection, functional alignment, and overcorrection. Conventional sagittal parameters and alignment status based on the Schwab's pelvic incidence (PI)-lumbar lordosis (LL) modifiers and age-adjusted PI-LL were compared according to the T10PA groups. The PJK rates were compared among the alignment schemes.ResultsOverall, 219 patients were enrolled in this study. At 6 weeks postoperatively, 33.3%, 37.0%, and 29.7% of the patients demonstrated undercorrection, functional alignment, and overcorrection relative to the T10PA, respectively. Conventional sagittal parameters significantly differed according to the T10PA groups. Linear regression analysis revealed that T10PA was significantly affected by PI (β = .562) and LL (β = - .411). The correction statuses of the Schwab's PI-LL modifiers and age-adjusted PI-LL were significantly differentiated between the T10PA correction groups. However, only 32.9% of patients with functional alignment relative to T10PA belonged to matched correction category for the age-adjusted PI-LL. Overcorrection relative to age-adjusted PI-LL and T10PA significantly increased PJK risks.ConclusionT10PA significantly correlated with conventional sagittal parameters, particularly PI and LL. Although the T10PA correction status correlated with that of the legacy alignment schemes, a notable discrepancy in the optimal correction was observed between the T10PA and age-adjusted PI-LL schemes. Overcorrection relative to T10PA and age-adjusted PI-LL should be avoided to mitigate PJK development.

Revision Strategy for Proximal Junctional Failure: Combined Effect of Proximal Extension and Focal Correction

Study designRetrospective review of a prospectively-collected multicenter database.ObjectivesThe objective of this study was to determine optimal strategies in terms of focal angular correction and length of proximal extension during revision for PJF.Methods134 patients requiring proximal extension for PJF were analyzed in this study. The correlation between amount of proximal junctional angle (PJA) reduction and recurrence of proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK) and/or PJF was investigated. Following stratification by the degree of PJK correction and the numbers of levels extended proximally, rates of radiographic PJK (PJA >28° & ΔPJA >22°), and recurrent surgery for PJF were reported.ResultsBefore revision, mean PJA was 27.6° ± 14.6°. Mean number of levels extended was 6.0 ± 3.3. Average PJA reduction was 18.8° ± 18.9°. A correlation between the degree of PJA reduction and rate of recurrent PJK was observed (r = -.222). Recurrent radiographic PJK (0%) and clinical PJF (4.5%) were rare in patients undergoing extension ≥8 levels, regardless of angular correction. Patients with small reductions (<5°) and small extensions (<4 levels) experienced moderate rates of recurrent PJK (19.1%) and PJF (9.5%). Patients with large reductions (>30°) and extensions <8 levels had the highest rate of recurrent PJK (31.8%) and PJF (16.0%).ConclusionWhile the degree of focal PJK correction must be determined by the treating surgeon based upon clinical goals, recurrent PJK may be minimized by limiting reduction to <30°. If larger PJA correction is required, more extensive proximal fusion constructs may mitigate recurrent PJK/PJF rates.

Are Surgical Outcomes Different According to Baseline Balance Status in Elderly Patients with Degenerative Sagittal Imbalance?

STUDY DESIGN

This is a retrospective study.

OBJECTIVE

We sought to compare surgical outcomes according to baseline balance statuses in elderly patients with degenerative sagittal imbalance (DSI).

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND

Although optimal sagittal correction has been emphasized for good surgical outcomes, the effect of the state of preoperative balance on surgical outcomes has been adequately described at present.

METHODS

Patients aged 60 years and above with DSI who underwent ≥5-level fusion to the sacrum were included. Among them, only those who postoperatively achieved the optimal age-adjusted pelvic incidence (PI) - lumbar lordosis (LL) target were included in this study. Study participants were divided into two groups according to their preoperative sagittal vertical axis (SVA): compensatory balance (SVA <5 cm, group CB) and decompensation (SVA ≥5 cm, group D). Comparisons between the two groups were performed using the χ 2 test or Fisher exact test for categorical variables and the independent t -test or Wilcoxon rank-sum test for continuous variables.

RESULTS

A total of 156 patients whose postoperative sagittal alignment matched the age-adjusted PI-LL target constituted the study cohort. There were 59 patients in group CB and 97 patients in group D. Mean follow-up duration was 50.0 months after surgery. Immediate postoperatively, sacral slope and SVA were significantly greater in group D than in group CB. At the last follow-up, the SVA was significantly greater in group D than in group CB (43.6 vs. 22.7 mm), while no significant differences were found in other sagittal parameters. The Oswestry disability index and Scoliosis Research Society -22 scores at the last follow-up were significantly worse in group D than in group CB.

CONCLUSION

The SVA tended to experience less correction postoperatively, with evidence of further deterioration during follow-up in group D than in group CB. This suboptimal correction of SVA may contribute to the inferior clinical outcomes encountered in group D relative to group CB. Therefore, we recommend correction of PI-LL as close as possible to the lower limit of the suggested PI-LL target range in patients with evidence of preoperative decompensation.

Hook Fixation at Uppermost Instrumented Vertebra +1 Reduced Proximal Junctional Failure in Adult Patients With Spinal Deformity Having Achieved Optimal Deformity Correction by Sagittal Age-Adjusted Score

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Appropriate correction relative to the age-adjusted sagittal alignment target reduces the proximal junctional failure (PJF) risk. Nonetheless, a considerable number of patients suffer from PJF despite optimal correction. The aim of this study was to identify the risk factors of PJF that occurs despite optimal correction relative to the sagittal age-adjusted score (SAAS) in adult spinal deformity surgery.

METHODS

Patients aged 60 years or older with adult spinal deformity who underwent ≥5-level fusion to the sacrum were initially screened. Among them, only patients who achieved optimal sagittal correction relative to the SAAS were included in the study. Optimal correction was defined as the SAAS point between -1 and +1. Various clinical and radiographic factors were compared between the PJF and no PJF groups and were further evaluated using multivariate analysis.

RESULTS

The final study cohort comprised 127 patients. The mean age was 67 years, and there were 111 women (87.4%). A mean of total fusion length was 7.2. PJF occurred in 42 patients (33.1%), while 85 patients (66.9%) did not develop PJF. Multivariate analysis showed that a high body mass index (odds ratio [OR] = 1.153, 95% CI = 1.027-1.295, P = .016), a higher lordosis distribution index (LDI) (OR = 1.024, 95% CI = 1.003-1.045, P = .022), and no use of hook fixation (OR = 9.708, 95% CI = 1.121-76.923, P = .032) were significant risk factors of PJF development. In the receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, the cutoff value for the LDI was calculated as 61.0% (area under the curve = 0.790, P < .001).

CONCLUSION

PJF developed in a considerable portion of patients despite optimal correction relative to the age-adjusted alignment. The risk factors of PJF in this patient group were high body mass index, high LDI exceeding 61%, and no use of hook fixation. PJF could be further decreased by properly managing these risk factors along with optimal sagittal correction.

Postsurgical outcomes differ according to baseline sagittal alignment status even in patients achieving adequate correction relative to age-adjusted alignment target for adult spinal deformity

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Baseline severities of sagittal malalignment and degrees of pelvic compensation may affect postsurgical outcomes differently after adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery, even if the patients achieved optimal correction of sagittal malalignment.

PURPOSE

To investigate whether postsurgical outcomes vary according to baseline sagittal alignment and pelvic compensation status in patients achieving adequate correction relative to age-adjusted alignment target in ASD surgery.

STUDY DESIGN/SETTING

Retrospective study PATIENT SAMPLE: Patients who underwent ≥ 5-level fusion to the pelvis for ASD; achieved matched correction relative to age-adjusted pelvic incidence (PI)-lumbar lordosis (LL); and completed ≥ 2-year follow-up.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Radiographic results, mechanical failures, and clinical outcomes METHODS: Patients were divided into three groups based on baseline sagittal vertical axis (SVA) and pelvic tilt (PT)/PI ratio (median value of PT/PI ratio = 0.61): Group A (SVA < 5 cm), Group B (SVA ≥ 5 cm and PT/PI ratio <0.61, and Group C (SVA ≥ 5 cm and PT/PI ratio ≥ 0.61). Radiographic results, mechanical failures, and clinical outcomes were compared among the three groups.

RESULTS

A total of 153 patients were included in the study. They were predominantly female (89.5%), with a mean age of 68.3 years. The mean follow-up duration was 49.0 months. There were 50 patients in group A (SVA < 5cm), 53 in group B (SVA ≥ 5cm and low PT/PI), and 50 in group C (SVA ≥ 5cm and high PT/PI). No significant differences were observed in all radiographic parameters at six weeks. At the last follow-up, the PI-LL was comparable among the three groups; however, the SVA was significantly greater in groups B and C than in group A (46.5mm and 46.9mm vs. 31.5mm, p=.039). The PT at the last follow-up was significantly lower in group B than in group A and C (22.4° vs. 26.0° and 28.2°, respectively, p=.001). The rates of mechanical failure and subsequent revision surgery and did not differ among the groups. The final clinical outcomes were comparable among the three groups.

CONCLUSIONS

This study revealed that patients in groups B and C were likely to have a suboptimal sagittal alignment status at the last follow-up compared with those in group A. Tailored approaches considering patient's baseline alignment and compensatory status are recommended to optimize the final sagittal alignment status.

Incidence and Risk Factors of Recurrent Proximal Junctional Failure in Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to examine the incidence and risk factors for recurrent proximal junctional failure (R-PJF) in adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery.

METHODS

Among 482 patients receiving ≥ five-level fusion to the pelvis for ASD, 60 patients who underwent fusion extension surgery for PJF were included in the study cohort. R-PJF was defined as the performance of re-revision surgery after revision surgery for PJF. Various clinical and radiographic variables were compared between no R-PJF and R-PJF groups. Stepwise multivariate logistic analysis was performed to identify the risk factors for R-PJF.

RESULTS

Of the 60 patients, there were 51 women (85.0%) and 9 men (15.0%) with a mean age of 72.4 ± 6.7 years. The mean fusion length at the index surgery was 7.3 ± 1.6 levels and an average of 4.1 ± 1.3 levels was extended during the revision surgery. Among them, R-PJF developed in 17 patients (28.3%). Multivariate analysis revealed that overcorrection relative to age-adjusted pelvic incidence (PI) - lumbar lordosis (LL) at the index surgery and high total sum of proximal junctional kyphosis severity scale (PJKSS) at the revision surgery were significant risk factors for R-PJF development. The cutoff value for the PJKSS sum was calculated as 8.5 points.

CONCLUSIONS

R-PJF was developed in 17 patients (28.3%). PI-LL overcorrection should be avoided during the index surgery to mitigate the R-PJF. In addition, timely surgical intervention is required in patients with PJF, considering that the PJF severity tends to increase over time.

Full-body Postural Alignment Analysis Through Barycentremetry

STUDY DESIGN

A multicentric retrospective study.

OBJECTIVE

The study of center of mass (COM) locations (ie, barycentremetry) can help us understand postural alignment. The goal of this study was to determine relationships between COM locations and global postural alignment x-ray parameters in healthy subjects. The second objective was to determine the impact on the spinopelvic alignment of increased distance between the anterior body envelope and spine at the lumbar apex level.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Unexplored relationship between COM location and spinopelvic parameters.

METHODS

This study included healthy volunteers with full-body biplanar radiographs, including body envelope reconstruction, allowing the estimation of COM location. The following parameters were analyzed: lumbar lordosis (LL), thoracic kyphosis (TK), cervical lordosis (CL), pelvic tilt (PT), sacro-femoral angle (SFA), knee flexion angle (KFA), and sagittal odontoid-hip axis angle (ODHA). The following COM in the sagittal plane were located: whole body, at a thoracolumbar inflection point, and body segment above TK apex. The body envelope reconstruction also provided the distance between the anterior skin and the LL apex vertebral body center ("SV-L distance").

RESULTS

This study included 124 volunteers, with a mean age of 44±19.3. Multivariate analysis confirmed the posterior translation of COM above TK apex with increasing LL ( P =0.002) through its proximal component and posterior shift of COM at the inflection point with increasing TK ( P =0.008). Increased SV-L distance was associated with greater ODHA ( r =0.4) and more anterior body COM ( r =0.5), caused by increased TK ( r =0.2) and decreased proximal and distal LL (both r =0.3), resulting in an augmentation in SFA ( r =0.3) (all P <0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Barycentremetry showed that greater LL was associated with a posterior shift of COM above the thoracic apex, while greater TK was correlated with more posterior COM at inflection point. Whole-body COM was strongly correlated with ODHA. This study also exhibited significant alignment disruption associated with increased abdominal volume, with compensatory hip extension.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level-II.

Proximal Junctional Failure Development Despite Achieving Ideal Sagittal Correction According to Age-Adjusted Alignment Target in Patients With Adult Spinal Deformity: Risk Factor Analysis of 196 Cases Undergoing Low Thoracic to Pelvic Fusion

OBJECTIVE

To identify the risk factors for proximal junctional failure (PJF) after adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery despite ideal sagittal correction according to age-adjusted alignment target.

METHODS

The study included patients who underwent low thoracic to pelvic fusion for ASD and obtained ideal correction according to age-adjusted pelvic incidence minus lumbar lordosis. PJF was defined either radiographically as a proximal junctional angle (PJA) of >28° plus a difference in PJA of >22° or clinically as revision surgery for proximal junctional complications. Clinical and radiographic variables were assessed to identify the risk factors for PJF.

RESULTS

The final study cohort consisted of 196 patients, of whom 170 were women (86.7%), with an average age of 68.3 years. During mean follow-up duration of 45.9 months, PJF occurred in 43 patients (21.9%). Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that old age (odds ratio [OR], 1.063; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.001-1.129; p=0.046), large preoperative sagittal vertical axis (OR, 1.007; 95% CI, 1.001-1.013; p=0.024), nonuse of a transverse process (TP) hook (OR, 5.556; 95% CI, 1.205-19.621; p=0.028), and high lumbar distribution index (LDI) (OR, 1.136; 95% CI, 1.109-1.164; p<0.001) were significant risk factors for PJF development.

CONCLUSION

A sizeable proportion of patients (21.9%) developed PJF despite achieving ideal sagittal correction. Using TP hooks with avoiding excessive LDI can be helpful to further mitigate the risk of PJF development in this patient group.

Risk Factors for Recurrent Proximal Junctional Failure Following Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery: Analysis of 60 Patients Undergoing Fusion Extension Surgery for Proximal Junctional Failure

BACKGROUND

Despite numerous studies identifying risk factors for proximal junctional failure (PJF), risk factors for recurrent PJF (R-PJF) are still not well established. Therefore, we aimed to identify the risk factors for R-PJF following adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery.

METHODS

Among 479 patients who underwent ≥5-level fusion surgery for ASD, the focus was on those who experienced R-PJF at any time or did not experience R-PJF during a follow-up duration of ≥1 year. PJF was defined as a proximal junctional angle (PJA) ≥28° plus a difference in PJA ≥22° or performance of revision surgery regardless of PJA degree. The patients were divided into 2 groups according to R-PJF development: no R-PJF and R-PJF groups. Risk factors were evaluated focusing on patient, surgical, and radiographic factors at the index surgery as well as at the revision surgery.

RESULTS

Of the 60 patients in the final study cohort, 24 (40%) experienced R-PJF. Significant risk factors included greater postoperative sagittal vertical axis (OR = 1.044), overcorrection relative to age-adjusted pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis (PI-LL; OR = 7.794) at the index surgery, a greater total sum of the proximal junctional kyphosis severity scale (OR = 1.145), and no use of the upper instrumented vertebra cement (OR = 5.494) at the revision surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

We revealed that the greater postoperative sagittal vertical axis and overcorrection relative to age-adjusted pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis at the index surgery, a greater proximal junctional kyphosis severity scale score, and no use of upper instrumented vertebra cement at the revision surgery were significant risk factors for R-PJF.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

To reduce the risk of R-PJF after ASD surgery, avoiding under- and overcorrection during the initial surgery is recommended. Additionally, close assessment of the severity of PJF with timely intervention is crucial, and cement augmentation should be considered during revision surgery.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3

Factors Associated With the Maintenance of Cost-effectiveness at Five Years in Adult Spinal Deformity Corrective Surgery

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate factors associated with the long-term durability of cost-effectiveness (CE) in ASD patients.

BACKGROUND

A substantial increase in costs associated with the surgical treatment for adult spinal deformity (ASD) has given precedence to scrutinize the value and utility it provides.

METHODS

We included 327 operative ASD patients with five-year (5 yr) follow-up. Published methods were used to determine costs based on CMS.gov definitions and were based on the average DRG reimbursement rates. The utility was calculated using quality-adjusted life-years (QALY) utilizing the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) converted to Short-Form Six-Dimension (SF-6D), with a 3% discount applied for its decline in life expectancy. The CE threshold of $150,000 was used for primary analysis.

RESULTS

Major and minor complication rates were 11% and 47%, respectively, with 26% undergoing reoperation by five years. The mean cost associated with surgery was $91,095±$47,003, with a utility gain of 0.091±0.086 at one years, QALY gained at 2 years of 0.171±0.183, and at five years of 0.42±0.43. The cost per QALY at two years was $414,885, which decreased to $142,058 at five years.With the threshold of $150,000 for CE, 19% met CE at two years and 56% at five years. In those in which revision was avoided, 87% met cumulative CE till life expectancy. Controlling analysis depicted higher baseline CCI and pelvic tilt (PT) to be the strongest predictors for not maintaining durable CE to five years [CCI OR: 1.821 (1.159-2.862), P =0.009] [PT OR: 1.079 (1.007-1.155), P =0.030].

CONCLUSIONS

Most patients achieved cost-effectiveness after four years postoperatively, with 56% meeting at five years postoperatively. When revision was avoided, 87% of patients met cumulative cost-effectiveness till life expectancy. Mechanical complications were predictive of failure to achieve cost-effectiveness at two years, while comorbidity burden and medical complications were at five years.

Characterization of Patients with Poor Clinical Outcome after Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery: A Multivariate Analysis of Mean 8-Year Follow-Up Data

Background/Objective: Limited data exist regarding the long-term clinical outcomes and related factors after adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery. This study aims to characterize patients who experienced poor clinical outcomes during long-term follow-up after ASD surgery. Methods: Patients who underwent ASD surgery with ≥5-vertebra fusion including the sacrum and ≥5-year follow-up were included. They were divided into two groups according to the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) at the last follow-up: group P (poor outcome, ODI > 40) and group NP (non-poor outcome, ODI ≤ 40). Clinical variables, including patient factors, surgical factors, radiographic parameters, and mechanical complications (proximal junctional kyphosis [PJK] and rod fracture), were compared between the groups. Results: A total of 105 patients were evaluated, with a mean follow-up of 100.6 months. The mean age was 66.3 years, and 94 patients (89.5%) were women. There were 52 patients in group P and 53 patients in group NP. Univariate analysis showed that low T-score, postoperative correction relative to age-adjusted pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis, T1 pelvic angle (TPA) at last follow-up, and PJK development were significant factors for poor clinical outcomes. Multivariate analysis identified PJK as the single independent risk factor (odds ratio [OR] = 3.957 for PJK development relative to no PJK, OR = 21.141 for revision surgery for PJK relative to no PJK). Conclusions: PJK development was the single independent factor affecting poor clinical outcomes in long-term follow-up. Therefore, PJK prevention appears crucial for achieving long-term success after ASD surgery.

Determining the utility of three-column osteotomies in revision surgery compared with primary surgeries in the thoracolumbar spine: a retrospective cohort study in the United States

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

PURPOSE

To determine the incidence and success of three-column osteotomies (3COs) performed in primary and revision adult spine deformity (ASD) corrective surgeries.

OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE

3COs are often required to correct severe, rigid ASD presentations. However, controversy remains on the utility of 3COs, particularly in primary surgery.

METHODS

Patients ASD having 2-year data were included and divided into 3CO and non-3CO (remaining ASD cohort) groups. For the subanalysis, patients were stratified based on whether they were undergoing primary (P3CO) or revision (R3CO) surgery. Multivariate analysis controlling for age, Charlson comorbidity index, body mass index, baseline pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis, and fused levels evaluated the complication rates and radiographic and patient-reported outcomes between the 3CO and non-3CO groups.

RESULTS

Of the 436 patients included, 20% had 3COs. 3COs were performed in 16% of P3COs and 51% of R3COs. Both 3CO groups had greater severity in deformity and disability at baseline; however, only R3COs improved more than non-3COs. Despite greater segmental correction, 3COs had much lower rates of aligning in the lumbar distribution index (LDI), higher mechanical complications, and more reoperations when performed below L3. When comparing P3COs and R3COs, baseline lumbopelvic and global alignments, as well as disability, were different. The R3CO group had greater clinical improvements and global correction (both p<0.04), although the P3CO group achieved alignment in LDI more often (odds ratio, 3.9; 95% confidence interval, 1.3-6.2; p=0.006). The P3CO group had more neurological complications (30% vs. 13%, p=0.042), whereas the R3CO tended to have higher mechanical complication rates (25% vs. 15%, p=0.2).

CONCLUSIONS

3COs showed greater improvements in realignment while failing to demonstrate the same clinical improvement as primaries without a 3CO. Overall, when suitably indicated, a 3CO offers superior utility for achieving optimal realignment across primary and revision surgeries for ASD correction.

Incidence and Risk Factors of Proximal Junctional Complications and Rod Fractures After Long-Segment Fusion Surgery With Anterior Column Realignment for Adult Spinal Deformity: A Minimum 2-Year Follow-Up

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

To investigate the incidence and risk factors of proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK), proximal junctional failure (PJF), and rod fractures in patients undergoing long-segment (≥4 levels) fusion surgery with anterior column realignment (ACR) for adult spinal deformity.

METHODS

Patients aged ≥60 years with at least a 2-year follow-up were grouped based on PJK, PJF, and rod fracture occurrence. Patient, surgical, and radiographic factors were compared to identify risk factors for these complications. Independent risk factors were identified using univariate and multivariate logistic regression.

RESULTS

Among 106 patients, the incidence rates of PJK, PJF, and rod fractures were 15.1%, 28.3%, and 17.9%, respectively. PJK was significantly associated with fewer fusion levels (odds ratio [95% CI], 0.30 [0.13-0.69]), a cranially directed uppermost instrumented vertebra (UIV) screw angle (1.40 [1.13-1.72]), postoperative overcorrection of age-adjusted pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis (LL) (7.22 [1.13-45.93]), and a large increase in thoracic kyphosis (1.09 [1.01-1.17]). PJF risks were associated with a cranial UIV screw orientation (1.23 [1.09-1.39]), overcorrection of age-adjusted pelvic incidence-LL (10.80 [2.55-45.73]), and a smaller change in sacral slope (0.87 [0.80-0.94]). For rod fractures, prominent factors included a greater number of fusion levels (1.70 [1.17-2.46]), a larger postoperative LL (1.07 [1.01-1.15]), a smaller postoperative thoracic kyphosis (0.92 [0.86-0.98]), and smaller changes in sacral slope (0.73 [0.58-0.92]) and pelvic tilt (0.72 [0.56-0.91]).

CONCLUSION

The incidence and risk factors of PJK, PJF, and rod fractures were similar to those observed in previous studies on long-segment fusion surgery without ACR. The number of ACR levels was not a significant risk factor for PJK, PJF, or rod fractures. When performing deformity correction using ACR, surgeons should carefully consider the direction of the UIV screw and ensure that overcorrection is avoided.

A Geometrical Explanation for Change in Pelvic Tilt (or Lack of Change) Following Long Spinal Fusions

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort.

OBJECTIVE

Examine the relationship between compensatory pelvic retroversion, positive sagittal imbalance (measured by C2 tilt), and the C2 pelvic angle (C2PA) in patients before long spinal fusions; and to determine the association between changes in C2PA and pelvic tilt (PT) following long spinal fusions.

BACKGROUND

Adult spinal deformity surgical goals often include a PT target, yet patients frequently demonstrate persistent compensatory pelvic retroversion following surgery.

METHODS

Adults above 18 years old undergoing long spinal fusions (>4 levels) with standing preoperative and postoperative radiographs were included. To examine drivers of preoperative sagittal balance, regression models were fit to estimate the association between preoperative C2PA and pelvic incidence with preoperative PT and C2 tilt. To predict postoperative change in PT, multivariable regression was used to estimate change in PT, adjusting for change in C2PA and preoperative C2 tilt.

RESULTS

Among the 80 patients identified, the median age was 61 (IQR: 45-72) and 46 (58%) were female. The median number of levels fused was 10 (IQR: 8-13) and 55 (69%) were instrumented to the sacrum/pelvis. Preoperative C2PA had a significant nonlinear association with preoperative PT ( r2 =0.81, P <0.001) and preoperative C2 tilt ( r2 =0.41, P =0.002). Postoperative change in PT was strongly associated with change in C2PA (β=0.81; P <0.001) and preoperative C2 tilt (β=0.55; P <0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Following long spinal fusions, change in PT (or lack thereof) can be reliably predicted based on change in C2PA and preoperative C2 tilt. In patients with normal preoperative C2 tilt, the change in C2PA is nearly equivalent to the change in PT, but in patients with more positive C2 tilt (sagittal imbalance), a greater change in C2PA will be required to achieve an equivalent change in PT.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3.

Different characteristics between acute and delayed proximal junctional failure in elderly patients undergoing corrective surgery for adult spinal deformity: comparative analysis of risk factor, failure mode, and clinical consequences

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

While numerous studies have been conducted on proximal junctional failure (PJF), the clinical significance of acute and delayed PJF remains poorly understood.

PURPOSE

The primary object of this study is to investigate the risk factors separately for acute and delayed PJF. Secondly, we aim to assess the incidence of each failure mode and their clinical consequences in relation to acute and delayed PJF.

STUDY DESIGN/SETTING

Retrospective comparative study.

PATIENT SAMPLE

Patients aged ≥60 years who underwent deformity correction with ≥5-level fusion to sacrum.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Risk factor, failure modes, and patient-reported outcome measure (PROM).

METHODS

Acute PJF is defined as PJF occurring within 6 months, while delayed PJF occurring after 6 months. Risk factors were analyzed by comparing various clinical and radiographic parameters among 3 groups: no, acute, and delayed PJF groups. The failure modes, including soft tissue failure, vertebral fracture, fixation failure, and myelopathy, were compared among these groups. The clinical subsequences after PJF development were evaluated by assessing the change in proximal junctional angle (PJA), revision rate, and patient-reported outcome measure (PROM).

RESULTS

A study cohort of 363 patients was included in the analysis. Among them, 156 patients experienced PJF, with 87 patients (55.8%) in the acute PJF group and 69 patients (44.2%) in the delayed PJF group. Multivariate analyses showed that older age (Odds ratio [OR] = 1.057, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.002-1.118), osteoporosis (OR=2.149, 95% CI = 1.074-4.300), high American Society of Anesthesiology ASA score (OR=2.150, 95% CI = 1.089-4.245), and overcorrection relative to the age-adjusted pelvic incidence - lumbar lordosis target (OR=4.031, 95% CI = 1.962-8.280) were identified as risk factors for the development of acute PJF. On the other hand, a high body mass index (OR=1.150, 95% CI = 1.049-1.251) and an uppermost instrumented vertebra located at ≤T10 (OR=2.267, 95% CI = 1.205-4.268) were found to be associated with delayed occurrence of PJF. No radiographic parameters were found to be related to the development of delayed PJF. In terms of failure modes, vertebral fracture and fixation failure were more commonly observed in acute PJF, while soft tissue failure and myelopathy were more predominant in delayed PJF. The clinical course was more aggressive in the acute PJF group compared to the delayed PJF group, as evidenced by a greater increase in PJA, a higher revision rate, and worse PROM.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrated different risk factors between the acute and delayed PJF. It was found that overcorrection relative to the age-adjusted PI-LL target increased the risk of acute PJF, but had no impact on the development of delayed PJF. Therefore, a different surgical strategy needs to be established to mitigate both acute and delayed PJF.

Sex-dependent evolution of whole-body postural alignment with age

PURPOSE

The goal of this study was to explore sex-related variations of global alignment parameters and their distinct evolution patterns across age groups.

METHODS

This multicentric retrospective study included healthy volunteers with full-body biplanar radiographs in free-standing position. All radiographic data were collected from 3D reconstructions: global and lower limb parameters, pelvic incidence (PI) and sacral slope (SS). Lumbar lordosis (LL), thoracic kyphosis (TK) and cervical lordosis (CL) were also assessed as well as the lumbar and thoracic apex, and thoracolumbar inflexion point. The population was divided into five 5 age groups: Children, Adolescents, Young, Middle-Aged and Seniors.

RESULTS

This study included 861 subjects (53% females) with a mean age of 34 ± 17 years. Mean PI was 49.6 ± 11.1 and mean LL was - 57.1 ± 11.6°. Females demonstrated a PI increase between Young and Middle-Aged groups (49 ± 11° vs. 55 ± 12°, p < 0.001) while it remained stable in males. SS and LL increased with age in females while remaining constant in males between Children and Middle-aged and then significantly decreased for both sexes between Middle-Aged and Seniors. On average, lumbar apex, inflexion point, and thoracic apex were located one vertebra higher in females (p < 0.001). After skeletal maturity, males had greater TK than females (64 ± 11° vs. 60 ± 12°, p = 0.04), with significantly larger CL (-13 ± 10° vs. -8 ± 10°, p = 0.03). All global spinal parameters indicated more anterior alignment in males.

CONCLUSION

Males present more anteriorly tilted spine with age mainly explained by a PI increase in females between Young and Middle-Aged, which may be attributed to childbirth. Consequently, SS and LL increased before decreasing at senior age.

Comparison of Surgical Burden, Radiographic and Clinical Outcomes According to the Severity of Baseline Sagittal Imbalance in Adult Spinal Deformity Patients

OBJECTIVE

To determine the clinical impact of the baseline sagittal imbalance severity in patients with adult spinal deformity (ASD).

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed patients who underwent ≥ 5-level fusion including the pelvis, for ASD with a ≥ 2-year follow-up. Using the Scoliosis Research Society-Schwab classification system, patients were classified into 3 groups according to the severity of the preoperative sagittal imbalance: mild, moderate, and severe. Postoperative clinical and radiographic results were compared among the 3 groups.

RESULTS

A total of 259 patients were finally included. There were 42, 62, and 155 patients in the mild, moderate, and severe groups, respectively. The perioperative surgical burden was greatest in the severe group. Postoperatively, this group also showed the largest pelvic incidence minus lumbar lordosis mismatch, suggesting a tendency towards undercorrection. No statistically significant differences were observed in proximal junctional kyphosis, proximal junctional failure, or rod fractures among the groups. Visual analogue scale for back pain and Scoliosis Research Society-22 scores were similar across groups. However, severe group's last follow-up Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) scores significantly lower than those of the severe group.

CONCLUSION

Patients with severe sagittal imbalance were treated with more invasive surgical methods along with increased the perioperative surgical burden. All patients exhibited significant radiological and clinical improvements after surgery. However, regarding ODI, the severe group demonstrated slightly worse clinical outcomes than the other groups, probably due to relatively higher proportion of undercorrection. Therefore, more rigorous correction is necessary to achieve optimal sagittal alignment specifically in patients with severe baseline sagittal imbalance.

Femoral neck version in the spinopelvic and lower limb 3D alignment: a full-body EOS® study in 400 healthy subjects

BACKGROUND

The goal of this study was to better understand the variation of femoral neck version according to spinopelvic and lower limb 3D alignment using biplanar X-rays in standing position.

METHODS

This multicentric study retrospectively included healthy subjects from previous studies who had free-standing position biplanar radiographs. Subjects were excluded if they presented spinal or any musculo-skeletal deformity, and reported pain in the spine, hip or knee. Age, sex, and the following 3D-reconstructed parameters were collected: spinal curvatures, pelvic parameters, sagittal vertical axis (SVA), T1 pelvic angle (TPA), spino-sacral angle (SSA), femoral torsion angle (FTA), sacro-femoral angle (SFA), knee flexion angle (KA), ankle angle (AA), pelvic shift (PS) and ankle distance. Femoral neck version angle (FVA) was calculated between horizontal plane projection of the bi-coxo-femoral axis and the line passing through the femoral neck barycenter and femoral head center. Analysis according to age subsets was performed.

RESULTS

A total of 400 subjects were included (219 females); mean age was 29 ± 18 years (range: 4-83). Subjects with high pelvic tilt values presented significantly higher FVA than average and low-PT individuals, respectively, 7.8 ± 7.1°, 2 ± 9° and 2.1 ± 9.5° (p < 0.001). These subjects also presented lower lumbar lordosis values and higher acetabulum anteversion in the horizontal plane than the two other groups. SVA correlation with FVA was weaker (r = 0.1, p = 0.03) than SSA and TPA (r = - 0.3 and r = 0.3, respectively, p < 0.001). A strong correlation was found with femoral torsion (r = 0.5, p < 0.001). SFA (r = - 0.3, p < 0.001), pelvic shift (r = 0.2, p < 0.001) and ankle distance (r = 0.3, p < 0.001) were also significantly correlated. Multivariate analysis confirmed significant association of age, pelvic tilt, lumbar lordosis, pelvic shift, ankle distance and femoral torsion with FVA.

CONCLUSION

Patients with lower lumbar lordosis present pelvic retroversion which induces a higher femoral neck version. This finding may help positioning implants in total hip replacement procedures. Higher pelvic shift, age, male gender and increased femoral torsion were also correlated with higher FVA.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

II (Diagnostic: individual cross-sectional studies with consistently applied reference standard and blinding).

Clinical Significance of Lordosis Orientation on Proximal Junctional Kyphosis Development in Long-Segment Fusion Surgery for Adult Spinal Deformity

OBJECTIVE

We sought to evaluate the clinical impact of lordosis orientation (LO) on proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK) development in adult spinal deformity surgery.

METHODS

This study included 152 patients who underwent low thoracic (T9-T12) to pelvis fusion and were followed up for ≥2 years. In the literature, 6 radiographic parameters representing LO were introduced, such as uppermost instrumented vertebra (UIV) slope, UIV inclination, UIV-femoral angle (UIVFA), thoracolumbar tilt, thoracolumbar slope, and lordosis tilt. Various clinical and radiographic factors including 6 LO parameters were investigated using logistic regression analysis to identify risk factors for PJK.

RESULTS

The mean age was 69.4 years, and 136 patients were females (89.5%). PJK developed in 65 patients (42.8%). Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that only small postoperative pelvic incidence (PI)-lumbar lordosis (LL) (odds ratio [OR] = 0.962, 95% confidence interval: 0.929-0.996, P = 0.030) and large UIVFA (OR = 1.089, 95% confidence interval: 1.028-1.154, P = 0.004) were significant for PJK development. UIVFA showed significantly positive correlation with pelvic tilt (CC = 0.509), thoracic kyphosis (CC = 0.384), and lordosis distribution index (CC = 0.223). UIVFA was also negatively correlated with sagittal vertical axis (CC = -0.371). However, UIVFA did not correlate with LL, PI-LL, or T1 pelvic angle.

CONCLUSIONS

LO significantly increases the risk of PJK development in ASD surgery. Multivariate analysis revealed that smaller postoperative PI-LL and greater UIVFA were significant risk factors for PJK. Surgeons should avoid undercorrection and overcorrection to prevent PJK development.

Persistent Lower Extremity Compensation for Sagittal Imbalance After Surgical Correction of Complex Adult Spinal Deformity: A Radiographic Analysis of Early Impact

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Achieving spinopelvic realignment during adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery does not always produce ideal outcomes. Little is known whether compensation in lower extremities (LEs) plays a role in this disassociation. The objective is to analyze lower extremity compensation after complex ASD surgery, its effect on outcomes, and whether correction can alleviate these mechanisms.

METHODS

We included patients with complex ASD with 6-week data. LE parameters were as follows: sacrofemoral angle, knee flexion angle, and ankle flexion angle. Each parameter was ranked, and upper tertile was deemed compensation. Patients compensating and not compensating postoperatively were propensity score matched for body mass index, frailty, and T1 pelvic angle. Linear regression assessed correlation between LE parameters and baseline deformity, demographics, and surgical details. Multivariate analysis controlling for baseline deformity and history of total knee/hip arthroplasty evaluated outcomes.

RESULTS

Two hundred and ten patients (age: 61.3 ± 14.1 years, body mass index: 27.4 ± 5.8 kg/m2, Charlson Comorbidity Index: 1.1 ± 1.6, 72% female, 22% previous total joint arthroplasty, 24% osteoporosis, levels fused: 13.1 ± 3.8) were included. At baseline, 59% were compensating in LE: 32% at hips, 39% knees, and 36% ankles. After correction, 61% were compensating at least one joint. Patients undercorrected postoperatively were less likely to relieve LE compensation (odds ratio: 0.2, P = .037). Patients compensating in LE were more often undercorrected in age-adjusted pelvic tilt, pelvic incidence, lumbar lordosis, and T1 pelvic angle and disproportioned in Global Alignment and Proportion (P < .05). Patients matched in sagittal age-adjusted score at 6 weeks but compensating in LE were more likely to develop proximal junctional kyphosis (odds ratio: 4.1, P = .009) and proximal junctional failure (8% vs 0%, P = .035) than those sagittal age-adjusted score-matched and not compensating in LE.

CONCLUSION

Perioperative lower extremity compensation was a product of undercorrecting complex ASD. Even in age-adjusted realignment, compensation was associated with global undercorrection and junctional failure. Consideration of lower extremities during planning is vital to avoid adverse outcomes in perioperative course after complex ASD surgery.

Adult spinal deformity correction surgery using age-adjusted alignment thresholds: clinical outcomes and mechanical complication rates. A systematic review of the literature

PURPOSE

Adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery gives good clinical outcomes but has a high rate of mechanical complications (MC). In 2016, Lafage described the age-adjusted alignment thresholds (AAAT) to adapt the correction in relation to patient's age proposing less aggressive corrections for the elderly population. The aim of this review was to clarify the effectiveness of AAAT to achieve good health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and their relationship with post-operative MC.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We performed a review of the literature, including articles reporting data on post-operative HRQoL and MC rates in relation to the AAAT. Data were stratified according to whether they matched the AAAT, dividing the population in undercorrected (U), matched (M) and overcorrected (O). The quality of the included studies was assessed using the GRADE and MINORS systems.

RESULTS

Six articles reporting data from 1,825 patients were included. The different categories (U, M and O) had homogeneous pre-operative sagittal parameters (p > 0.05) that became statistically different after surgeries (p < 0.05). Proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK) was more frequent in the O group compared to U (p = 0.05). Post-operative HRQoL parameters were similar in the 3 groups (p > 0.05). The quality of the included studies was generally low with a high bias risk.

CONCLUSION

The results extrapolated from this review are interesting, as for the same HRQoL the U group had a lower MC rate. Unfortunately, the results are inconsistent, mainly because of the low quality of the included studies and the lack of reporting of some important patient- and surgery-related factors.

How does the correction in lumbar lordosis affect the spinopelvic realignments in degenerative lumbar scoliosis underwent scoliosis surgery?

BACKGROUND

To evaluate the effects of correction in lumbar lordosis (LL) that have on full-body realignments in patients with degenerative lumbar scoliosis (DLS) who had undergone long sacroiliac fusion surgery.

METHODS

A multi-center retrospective study including 88 DLS patients underwent the surgical procedure of long sacroiliac fusion with instrumentations was performed. Comparisons of radiographic and quality-of-life (QoL) data among that at the pre-operation, the 3rd month and the final follow-up were performed. The correlations between the LL correction and the changes in other spinopelvic parameters were explored using Pearson-correlation linear analysis and linear regression analysis. The correlation coefficient (r) and the adjusted r2 were calculated subsequently.

RESULTS

All radiographic and QoL data improved significantly (P < 0.001) after the surgical treatments. The LL correction correlated (P < 0.001) with the changes in the sacral slope (SS, r = 0.698), pelvic tilt (PT, r = -0.635), sagittal vertical axis (SVA, r = -0.591), T1 pelvic angle (TPA, r = -0.782), and the mismatch of pelvic incidence minus lumbar lordosis (PI-LL, r = -0.936), respectively. Moreover, LL increased by 1° for each of the following spinopelvic parameter changes (P < 0.001): 2.62° for SS (r2 = 0.488), -4.01° for PT (r2 = 0.404), -4.86° for TPA (r2 = 0.612), -2.08° for the PI-LL (r2 = 0.876) and -15.74 mm for SVA (r2 = 0.349). Changes in the thoracic kyphosis (r = 0.259) and pelvic femur angle (r = 0.12) were independent of the LL correction, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

LL correction correlated significantly to the changes in spinopelvic parameters; however, those independent variables including the thoracic spine and hip variables probably be remodeled themselves to maintain the full-body balance in DLS patients underwent the correction surgery.

Relationship between pelvic incidence-adjusted relative spinopelvic parameters, global sagittal alignment and lower extremity compensations

PURPOSE

In response to sagittal malalignment, compensatory spinal and lower extremity mechanisms are recruited. Thoracolumbar realignment surgery has been shown to yield reciprocal changes in these compensations. Thus, whole-body radiographic assessment has come to the fore. This study aimed to evaluate the relationship between spinopelvic parameters and lower extremity compensation angles and to examine their coupled change with deformity correction.

METHODS

This was a multicenter retrospective analysis of patients who had ≥ 4 levels posterior fusion, whole-body radiographs, and ≥ 2 years follow-up. Relative Pelvic Version (RPV), Relative Lumbar Lordosis (RLL), Relative Spinopelvic Alignment (RSA), Femoral Obliquity Angle (FOA), Knee Flexion Angle (KFA) and Global Sagittal Axis (GSA) were measured preoperatively and 6 week postoperatively. Kruskal-Wallis tests were performed to assess the relation of relative spinopelvic parameters to global sagittal alignment and lower extremity compensation angles. Spearman's correlations were performed to assess correlations of pre-to-postoperative changes.

RESULTS

193 patients (156F, 37 M) were included. The mean age was 57.2 ± 16.6 years. The mean follow-up duration was 50.6 (24-90) months. On average, 10.3 ± 3.8 levels were fused. Among the cohort, 124 (64.2%) had a sacral or sacroiliac fixation, and 43 (22.3%) had 3-column osteotomies. Preoperative FOA, KFA and GSA significantly differed between RPV, RLL and RSA categories. Significant weak-to-strong correlations were observed between spinopelvic parameters, global sagittal alignment and lower extremity compensation angles (rho range: - 0.351 to 0.767).

CONCLUSIONS

PI-adjusted relative spinopelvic parameters significantly correlated with measurements of the lower extremity compensation. Postoperative changes in RPV, RLL and RSA reflected changes in FOA, KFA and GSA. These measurements may serve as a valuable proxy for surgical planning when whole-body imaging is not available.

Does the Amount of Correction of Sagittal Deformity Really Promote Proximal Junctional Kyphosis? Multivariate Analyses According to Uppermost Instrumented Vertebra Levels

BACKGROUND

The present study assumed that the effects of deformity correction amounts on proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK) development after long deformity surgery would vary according to uppermost instrumented vertebrae (UIV) levels. Our study was to reveal the association between the amount of correction and PJK according to UIV levels.

METHODS

Adult spinal deformity patients aged >50 years who underwent thoracolumbar fusion (≥4 levels) were included. PJK was defined by proximal junctional angles ≥15°. Presumed demographic and radiographic risk factors for PJK were evaluated including parameters regarding the correction amount such as postoperative change in lumbar lordosis and postoperative offset grouping, the value associated with age-adjusted pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis mismatch. The patients were divided according to UIV levels of T10 or above (group A) and T11 or below (group B). Multivariate analyses were performed separately for both groups.

RESULTS

The present study included 241 patients (74 for group A and 167 for group B). PJK developed in approximately half of all patients within an average of 5 years of follow-up. For group A, only body mass index (P = 0.002) was associated with PJK. No radiographic parameters were correlated. For group B, postoperative change in lumbar lordosis (P = 0.009) and offset value (P = 0.030) were significant risk factors for PJK development.

CONCLUSIONS

The correction amount of sagittal deformity increased the risk of PJK only in patients with UIV at or below T11. However, it was not associated with PJK development in patients with UIV at or above T10.

Outcomes of Surgical Treatment for Patients With Mild Scoliosis and Age-Appropriate Sagittal Alignment With Minimum 2-Year Follow-up

OBJECTIVE

The goal of this study was to determine if patients with mild scoliosis and age-appropriate sagittal alignment have favorable outcomes following surgical correction.

METHODS

Retrospective review of a prospective, multicenter adult spinal deformity database. Inclusion criteria: operative patients age ≥18 years, and preoperative pelvic tilt, mismatch between pelvic incidence and lumbar lordosis (PI-LL), and C7 sagittal vertical axis all within established age-adjusted thresholds with minimum 2-year follow-up. Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) scores: Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), 36-item Short Form health survey (SF-36), Scoliosis Research Society-22R (SRS22R), back/leg pain Numerical Rating Scale and minimum clinically important difference (MCID)/substantial clinical benefit (SCB). Two-year and preoperative HRQoL radiographic data were compared. Patients with mild scoliosis (Mild Scoli, Max coronal Cobb 10°-30°) were compared to those with larger curves (Scoli).

RESULTS

One hundred fifty-one patients included from 667 operative patients (82.8% women; average age, 56.4 ± 16.2 years). Forty-two patients (27.8%) included in Mild Scoli group. Mild Scoli group had significantly worse baseline leg pain, ODI, and physical composite scores (p < 0.02). Mean 2-year maximum coronal Cobb angle was significantly improved compared to baseline (p < 0.001). All 2-year HRQoL measures were significantly improved compared to (p < 0.001) except mental composite score, SRS activity and SRS mental for the Mild Scoli group (p > 0.05). From the mild Scoli group, 36%-74% met either MCID or SCB for the HRQoL measures. Sixty-four point three percent had minimum 1 complication, 28.6% had a major complication, 35.7% had reoperation.

CONCLUSION

Mild scoliosis patients with age-appropriate sagittal alignment benefit from surgical correction, decompression, and stabilization at 2 years postoperative despite having a high complication rate.

Introduction of a New Radiographic Parameter to Predict Proximal Junctional Kyphosis in Adult Spinal Deformity: UIVPTA (Uppermost Instrumented Vertebra-Pelvic Tilt Angle)

OBJECTIVE

To introduce a new sagittal parameter, uppermost instrumented vertebra-pelvic tilt angle (UIVPTA), and to determine the effects on the proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK) development in adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery.

METHODS

Patients ≥ 60 years with ASD who underwent low thoracic spine to pelvis fusion with a minimum of 2-years of follow-up were included in this study. Two groups were created according to PJK development. Various clinical and radiographic factors were compared between PJK and non-PJK groups to identify the risk factors for PJK. Cutoff value of UIVPTA for PJK development was calculated using receiver operating characteristic curve according to different pelvic incidence groups. Linear regression analysis was performed to identify factors to affect UIVPTA.

RESULTS

One hundred fifity-one patients were included in this study. There were 135 female patients (89.4%). Mean age was 70.5 years. PJK developed in 65 patients (43.0%). Multivariate analysis showed that overcorrection relative to age-adjusted pelvic incidence (PI) minus lumbar lordosis (LL) (PI-LL) target and lower UIVPTA were independent risk factors for PJK. The cutoff value of UIVPTA for PJK development was calculated as 4.0° in patients with PI less than 45°, 9.5° in patients with PI between 45° and 60°, and 13.0° in patients with PI greater than 60°. Linear regression analysis showed that UIVPTA was positively affected by postoperative values of LL (coefficient = 0.505), PI-LL (coefficient = 0.674), and pelvic tilt (coefficient = 0.286).

CONCLUSION

Optimal correction within the age-adjusted PI-LL combined with keeping UIVPTA within optimal range is suggested for the prevention of PJK.

A Validation Study of Four Preoperative Surgical Planning Tools for Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery in Proximal Junctional Kyphosis and Clinical Outcomes

BACKGROUND

Four guidelines have been suggested for optimal correction in adult spinal deformity surgery: Scoliosis Research Society (SRS)-Schwab classification, age-adjusted sagittal alignment goals, Global Alignment and Proportion (GAP) score, and the Roussouly algorithm. Whether these goals provide benefit in both proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK) reduction and clinical outcome improvement remains unclear.

OBJECTIVE

To validate 4 preoperative surgical planning tools in PJK development and clinical outcomes.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed patients who underwent ≥5-segment fusion including the sacrum for adult spinal deformity with a follow-up of ≥2-year. PJK development and clinical outcomes were compared among the groups separately using 4 surgical guidelines: SRS-Schwab pelvic incidence (PI)-lumbar lordosis (LL) modifier (Group 0, +, ++), age-adjusted PI-LL goal (undercorrection, matched correction, and overcorrection), GAP score (proportioned, moderately disproportioned, and severely disproportioned groups), and the Roussouly algorithm (restored and nonrestored groups).

RESULTS

A total of 189 patients were included in this study. The mean age was 68.3 years, and there were 162 women (85.7%). There were no differences in the rate of PJK development and clinical outcomes among SRS-Schwab PI-LL modifier and GAP score groups. With the age-adjusted PI-LL goal, PJK developed significantly less frequently in the matched group compared with the under- and overcorrection groups. Clinical outcomes were significantly better in the matched group compared with the under- and overcorrection groups. With the Roussouly algorithm, PJK developed significantly less frequently in the restored group than in the nonrestored group. However, there were no differences in clinical outcomes between the 2 Roussouly groups.

CONCLUSION

Correction according to the age-adjusted PI-LL goal and the restored Roussouly type was associated with reduced PJK development. However, differences in clinical outcomes were only observed in the age-adjusted PI-LL groups.

Radiographic Factors of Proximal Junctional Failure According to Age Groups in Adult Spinal Deformity

Background

Patient age has been associated with the development of proximal junctional failure (PJF). The characteristics of adult spinal deformity (ASD) are considered different between younger and older age groups. We hypothesized that the radiographic risk factors of PJF would be different according to age groups. This study aimed to evaluate different radiographic risk factors of PJF between two age groups undergoing thoracolumbar fusion for ASD.

Methods

ASD patients aged ≥ 60 years who underwent thoracolumbar fusion from the low thoracic level (T9-T12) to the sacrum were included. The minimum follow-up duration was 2 years. PJF was defined as proximal junctional angle (PJA) ≥ 20°, fixation failure, fracture, myelopathy, or necessity of revision surgery. Using various radiographic risk factors including age-adjusted ideal pelvic incidence (PI)-lumbar lordosis (LL), univariate and multivariate analyses were performed separately in two age groups: < 70 years and ≥ 70 years.

Results

A total of 186 patients (90.3% women) with a mean age of 69 years were enrolled. The mean follow-up duration was 67.4 months. PJF developed in 97 patients (52.2%). There were fractures in 53 patients, PJA ≥ 20° in 26, fixation failure in 12, and myelopathy in 6. PJF developed more frequently in patients 70 years or older than in those younger than 70 years. In patients aged less than 70 years, preoperative LL, PI-LL, and a change in LL were significant risk factors in univariate analysis. Multivariate analysis showed only a change in LL was significant for PJF development (odds ratio [OR], 1.025; p = 0.021). On the other hand, in patients 70 years or older, postoperative LL, postoperative PI-LL, and overcorrection relative to the conventional PI-LL target (within ± 10°) and age-adjusted ideal PI-LL target were significant risk factors. On multivariate analysis, only overcorrection of PI-LL relative to the age-adjusted ideal target was a single significant risk factor of PJF (OR, 5.250; p = 0.024).

Conclusions

In patients younger than 70 years, a greater change in LL was associated with PJF development regardless of PI-related values. However, in older patients, overcorrection of PI-LL relative to the age-adjusted PI-LL target was a significant risk factor of PJF.

Validation of Age-adjusted Ideal Sagittal Alignment in Terms of Proximal Junctional Failure and Clinical Outcomes in Adult Spinal Deformity

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective study.

OBJECTIVE

To validate the age-adjusted ideal sagittal alignment in terms of proximal junctional failure (PJF) and clinical outcomes.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND

It is reported that optimal sagittal correction with regard to the age-adjusted ideal sagittal alignment reduces the risk of PJF development. However, few studies have validated this concept. The age-considered optimal correction is likely to be undercorrection in terms of conventional surgical target, such as pelvic incidence (PI)-lumbar lordosis (LL) within ±9°. Therefore, the clinical impact of age-adjusted sagittal alignment should be evaluated along with radiographic effect.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Adult spinal deformity patients, aged 50 years and above, who underwent greater than or equal to four-level fusion to sacrum with a minimum of four years of follow-up data were included in this study. Radiographic risk factors for PJF (including age-adjusted ideal PI-LL) were evaluated with multivariate analyses. Three groups were created based on PI-LL offset between age-adjusted ideal PI-LL and actual actual PI-LL: undercorrection, ideal correction, and overcorrection. Clinical outcomes were compared among the three groups.

RESULTS

This study included 194 adult spinal deformity patients. The mean age was 68.5 years and there were 172 females (88.7%). PJF developed in 99 patients (51.0%) at a mean postoperative period of 14.9 months. Multivariate analysis for PJF revealed that only PI-LL offset group had statistical significance. The proportion of patients with PJF was greatest in the overcorrection group followed by the ideal correction and undercorrection groups. Overcorrected patients regard to the age-adjusted ideal alignment showed poorer clinical outcomes than the other patient groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Overcorrection relative to age-adjusted sagittal alignment increases the risk of PJF development and is associated with poor clinical outcomes. Older patients and those with small PI are likely to be overcorrected in terms of the age-adjusted PI-LL target. Therefore, the age-adjusted alignment should be considered more strictly in these patients.

Efficacy of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in the treatment of double-level lumbar spondylolisthesis with sagittal imbalance

OBJECTIVE

To analyze the clinical efficacy of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) in the treatment of continuous double-level lumbar spondylolisthesis with sagittal imbalance.

METHODS

The clinical data of 36 patients with double-level spondylolisthesis treated with TLIF were included and divided into L3/L4 double spondylolisthesis group and L4/L5 double spondylolisthesis group according to the site of spondylolisthesis. The sagittal parameters of the patients were measured by standing anteroposterior and lateral X-rays of the whole spine, and the visual analogue scale (VAS) for lumbar and lower limb pain, Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA), and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) were recorded. The imaging parameters and clinical parameters of the patients before surgery, after surgery, and at the last follow-up were compared and statistically analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 36 patients were included in the study and all had sagittal imbalance. Among them, there were 21 cases of L3 and L4 spondylolisthesis, 6 males and 15 females, with an average age of 64.7 ± 9.4 years; there were 15 cases of L4 and L5 spondylolisthesis, 4 males and 11 females, with an average age of 66.5 ± 8.0 years. 36 patients completed the operation, the operation time was 190.28 ± 6.12 min, and intraoperative blood loss was 345 ± 11 ml. Compared with preoperative, there were significant differences in SVA, TPA, T1-SPi, LL, PT, SS, PI-LL, SD, SA, and SP between patients after surgery and at the last follow-up (P < 0.05). Compared with preoperative, VAS score, JOA score, and ODI index of waist and lower limbs were significantly improved after the operation and at the last follow-up, and there was a significant difference (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

TLIF can effectively relieve the symptoms of patients with continuous double-level lumbar spondylolisthesis, restore lumbar lordosis and sagittal spinal sequence, and improve the quality of life of patients.

Age and Gender Based Spinopelvic and Regional Spinal Alignment in Asymptomatic Adult Volunteers: Results of the Multi-Ethnic Alignment Normative Study (MEANS)

BACKGROUND

Spinal alignment can have a significant impact on a patient's overall quality of life. Predicting the ideal sagittal spinal alignment of a specific individual is still a difficult task. The Multi-Ethnic Alignment Normative Study (MEANS) investigated skeletal alignment, including the spine and lower extremities, of the largest multi-ethnic cohort of asymptomatic adult volunteers. In this analysis, the authors aim to assess normative values of spinopelvic parameters and the regional cervical, thoracic, and lumbar spinal alignment in asymptomatic volunteers stratified by age and sex.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Asymptomatic volunteers between ages 18 and 80 years were enrolled prospectively from centers in France, Japan, Singapore, Tunisia, and the United States. Volunteers included reported no significant neck or back pain (Visual Analog Scale ≤2), nor any known spinal disorder(s). All volunteers underwent a standing full-body or full-spine low-dose stereoradiograph.

RESULTS

MEANS consisted of 468 volunteers with a mean age of 40.4±14.8 years. Mean cervical lordosis from C2 to C7 was -0.4±12.7°. The T1-slope averaged 23.0±7.9° and showed strong correlation ( r =0.87) with the C7-slope mean of 19.8±8.6°. Thoracic kyphosis (TK) from T4 to T12 showed a mean of 37.4±10.9°. Average L1-S1 lumbar lordosis (LL) was -57.4±11.3°. The mean pelvic incidence (PI) measured 52.0±10.7° and pelvic tilt was 12.5±7.3°. Sacral slope averaged 39.5±8.2°. The average PI-LL was -5.4±10.7°. Approximately 60% of volunteers met the PI-LL criteria within ±10°, 8.3% were ≥10°, while 32.1% were ≤-10°. LL showed moderate correlation with PI ( r =0.53) and TK ( r =0.50), while there was no correlation between TK and PI. Multiple linear regression including PI, TK, and age resulted in the following equation LL=14.6+0.57 (PI)+0.57 (TK)-0.2 (age) ( r =0.75).

CONCLUSIONS

LL did not change with increasing age in asymptomatic volunteers. However, TK did increase with age leading to an increase in T1-slope and a compensatory increase in cervical lordosis. TK did not correlate with PI and was an independent variable in the prediction of LL.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level II-prospective cohort study.

Increasing Cost Efficiency in Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery: Identifying Predictors of Lower Total Costs

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective study of a prospective multicenter database.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to identify predictors of lower total surgery costs at 3 years for adult spinal deformity (ASD) patients.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

ASD surgery involves complex deformity correction.

METHODS

Inclusion criteria: surgical ASD (scoliosis ≥20°, sagittal vertical axis [SVA] ≥5 cm, pelvic tilt ≥25°, or thoracic kyphosis ≥60°) patients >18 years. Total costs for surgery were calculated using the PearlDiver database. Cost per quality-adjusted life year was assessed. A Conditional Variable Importance Table used nonreplacement sampling set of 20,000 Conditional Inference trees to identify top factors associated with lower cost surgery for low (LSVA), moderate (MSVA), and high (HSVA) SRS Schwab SVA grades.

RESULTS

Three hundred sixtee of 322 ASD patients met inclusion criteria. At 3-year follow up, the potential cost of ASD surgery ranged from $57,606.88 to $116,312.54. The average costs of surgery at 3 years was found to be $72,947.87, with no significant difference in costs between deformity groups (P > 0.05). There were 152 LSVA patients, 53 MSVA patients, and 111 HSVA patients. For all patients, the top predictors of lower costs were frailty scores <0.19, baseline (BL) SRS Activity >1.5, BL Oswestry Disability Index <50 (all P < 0.05). For LSVA patients, no history of osteoporosis, SRS Activity scores >1.5, age <64, were the top predictors of lower costs (all P < 0.05). Among MSVA patients, ASD invasiveness scores <94.16, no past history of cancer, and frailty scores <0.3 trended toward lower total costs (P = 0.071, P = 0.210). For HSVA, no history of smoking and body mass index <27.8 trended toward lower costs (both P = 0.060).

CONCLUSION

ASD surgery has the potential for improved cost efficiency, as costs ranged from $57,606.88 to $116,312.54. Predictors of lower costs included higher BL SRS activity, decreased frailty, and not having depression. Additionally, predictors of lower costs were identified for different BL deformity profiles, allowing for the optimization of cost efficiency for all patients.Level of Evidence: 3.

Cervical and spinopelvic parameters can predict patient reported outcomes following cervical deformity surgery

Background:

Recent studies have evaluated the correlation of health-related quality of life (HRQL) scores with radiographic parameters. This relationship may provide insight into the connection of patient-reported disability and disease burden caused by cervical diagnoses.

Purpose:

To evaluate the association between spinopelvic sagittal parameters and HRQLs in patients with primary cervical diagnoses.

Methods:

Patients ≥18 years meeting criteria for primary cervical diagnoses. Cervical radiographic parameters assessed cervical sagittal vertical axis, TS-CL, chin-to-brow vertical angle, C2-T3, CL, C2 Slope, McGregor's slope. Global radiographic alignment parameters assessed PT, SVA, PI-LL, T1 Slope. Pearson correlations were run for all combinations at baseline (BL) and 1 year (1Y) for continuous BL and 1Y modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association scale (mJOA) scores, as well as decline or improvement in those HRQLs at 1Y. Multiple linear regression models were constructed to investigate BL and 1Y alignment parameters as independent variables.

Results:

Ninety patients included 55.6 ± 9.6 years, 52% female, 30.7 ± 7kg/m². By approach, 14.3% of patients underwent procedures by anterior approach, 56% posterior, and 30% had combined approaches. Average anterior levels fused: 3.6, posterior: 4.8, and mean total number of levels fused: 4.5. Mean operative time for the cohort was 902.5 minutes with an average estimated blood loss of 830 ccs. The mean BL neck disability index (NDI) score was 56.5 and a mJOA of 12.81. While BL NDI score correlated with gender (P = 0.050), it did not correlate with BL global or cervical radiographic factors. An increased NDI score at 1Y postoperatively correlated with BL body mass index (P = 0.026). A decreased NDI score was associated with 1Y T12-S1 angle (P = 0.009) and 1Y T10 L2 angle (P = 0.013). Overall, BL mJOA score correlated with the BL radiographic factors of T1 slope (P = 0.005), cervical lordosis (P = 0.001), C2-T3 (P = 0.008), C2 sacral slope (P = 0.050), SVA (P = 0.010), and CL Apex (P = 0.043), as well as gender (P = 0.050). Linear regression modeling for the prior independent variables found a significance of P = 0.046 and an R² of 0.367. Year 1 mJOA scores correlated with 1Y values for maximum kyphosis (P = 0.043) and TS-CL (P = 0.010). At 1Y, a smaller mJOA score correlated with BL S1 sacral slope (P = 0.014), pelvic incidence (P = 0.009), L1-S1 (P = 0.012), T12-S1 (P = 0.008). The linear regression model for those 4 variables demonstrated an R² of 0.169 and a P = 0.005. An increased mJOA score correlated with PI-LL difference at 1Y (P = 0.012), L1-S1 difference (P = 0.036), T12-S1 difference (0.006), maximum lordosis (P = 0.026), T9-PA difference (P = 0.010), and difference of T4-PA (P = 0.008).

Conclusions:

While the impact of preoperative sagittal and cervical parameters on mJOA was strong, the BL radiographic factors did not impact NDI scores. PostOp HRQL was significantly associated with sagittal parameters for mJOA (both worsening and improvement) and NDI scores (improvement). When cervical surgery has been indicated, radiographic alignment is important for postoperative HRQL.

A Self-Contained 3D Biomechanical Analysis Lab for Complete Automatic Spine and Full Skeleton Assessment of Posture, Gait and Run

Quantitative functional assessment of Posture and Motion Analysis of the entire skeleton and spine is highly desirable. Nonetheless, in most studies focused on posture and movement biomechanics, the spine is only grossly depicted because of its required level of complexity. Approaches integrating pressure measurement devices with stereophotogrammetric systems have been presented in the literature, but spine biomechanics studies have rarely been linked to baropodometry. A new multi-sensor system called GOALS-E.G.G. (Global Opto-electronic Approach for Locomotion and Spine-Expert Gait Guru), integrating a fully genlock-synched baropodometric treadmill with a stereophotogrammetric device, is introduced to overcome the above-described limitations. The GOALS-EGG extends the features of a complete 3D parametric biomechanical skeleton model, developed in an original way for static 3D posture analysis, to kinematic and kinetic analysis of movement, gait and run. By integrating baropodometric data, the model allows the estimation of lower limb net-joint forces, torques and muscle power. Net forces and torques are also assessed at intervertebral levels. All the elaborations are completely automatised up to the mean behaviour extraction for both posture and cyclic-repetitive tasks, allowing the clinician/researcher to perform, per each patient, multiple postural/movement tests and compare them in a unified statistically reliable framework.

A Systematic Review of Treatment Strategies for the Prevention of Junctional Complications After Long-Segment Fusions in the Osteoporotic Spine

STUDY DESIGN

Systematic review.

OBJECTIVES

Proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK) and proximal junctional failure (PJF) are well-known complications after long-segment fusions in the thoracolumbar spine of osteoporotic patients. Recent advances in anti-resorptive and anabolic medications, instrumentation, surgical technique, and cement augmentation have all aided in the avoidance of junctional kyphosis. In this article, current literature on the prevention of PJK and PJF in the osteoporotic spine is reviewed.

METHODS

A systematic literature review was conducted using the PubMed/MEDLINE and Embase databases in order to search for the current preventive treatment methods for PJK and PJF published in the literature (1985 to present). Inclusion criteria included (1) published in English, (2) at least 1-year mean and median follow-up, (3) preoperative diagnosis of osteoporosis, (4) at least 3 levels instrumented, and (5) studies of medical treatment or surgical techniques for prevention of junctional kyphosis.

RESULTS

The review of the literature yielded 7 studies with low levels of evidence ranging from level II to IV. Treatment strategies reviewed addressed prophylaxis against ligamentous failure, adjacent vertebral compression fracture, and/or bone-implant interface failure. This includes studies on the effect of osteoporosis medication, cement augmentation, multi-rod constructs, and posterior-tension band supplementation. The role of perioperative teriparatide therapy maintains the highest level of evidence.

CONCLUSIONS

Perioperative teriparatide therapy represents the strongest evidence for preventive treatment, and further clinical trials are warranted. Use of cement augmentation, sublaminar tethers, and multi-rod constructs have low or insufficient evidence for recommendations. Future guidelines for adult spinal deformity correction may consider bone mineral density-adjusted alignment goals.

The importance of sagittal balance in adult scoliosis surgery

Adult spinal deformity is an important health issue worldwide with our aging population. Understanding ideal sagittal alignment parameters is crucial for planning reconstructive surgery. Despite its variability, sagittal spinopelvic parameters are well recognized as the most crucial factor in predicting postoperative outcomes and risks of revision surgery. Thus, understanding the fundamental concepts of spinopelvic harmony is of utmost importance because they provide useful recommendations for what should be achieved during surgery. The main pathology in degenerative spine disease is the loss of lumbar lordosis (LL), which contributes to lower back pain. The loss of LL may occur as a result of natural history with spinal degeneration or by previous lumbar spine fusion. With adult spinal deformity, understanding the compensatory mechanisms available to patients is important for determining the timing of surgery. The main compensatory mechanisms patients adopt to maintain an upright posture include decreased sacral slope (SS), increased pelvic tilt (PT), decreased thoracic kyphosis (TK). Failure of these compensatory mechanisms leads to recruitment of the lower limbs with flexed hips and knees. At this stage, the patient is decompensated and result in positive sagittal alignment. This sagittal imbalance can be easily measured by the sagittal vertical axis (SVA) and is associated with worse patient-perceived outcome scores. These sagittal parameters also indicate whether surgical reconstruction is required and provides the necessary alignment goals. Depending on the value of pelvic incidence (PI), there are different LL goals. High PI has increased capacity for pelvic retroversion but requires greater lordosis correction. Proper restoration of the LL according to the PI will reduce pelvic retroversion reflected by reduced PT. Without adherence to these surgical goals, complications such as proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK) may occur. It is imperative to restore normal spinopelvic balance to maximize functional outcomes, reduce pain, and avoid complications.