Volunteerism and Cardiovascular Health: The HCHS/SOL Sociocultural Ancillary Study

Sources of well-being and cardiovascular health: A mixed methods investigation from the MIDUS study

OBJECTIVE

Using mixed methods, we investigated whether different sources of well-being were associated with better cardiovascular health.

METHODS

Data came from adults (55% women; 19% Black, 75% White) with biomarker data from the Midlife in the United States (MIDUS) Study. At the second wave and in a refresher cohort, participants answered the question "What do you do to make your life go well?" Judges evaluated each response for the presence of 12 sources of well-being (e.g., positive relationships, faith, health maintenance). Participants were also assessed on 8 components of cardiovascular health at two waves, an average of 12 years apart. Concurrent (N = 2036) and longitudinal (N = 650) linear regressions examined the association between each well-being source in unadjusted models and models adjusted for sociodemographic factors and word count.

RESULTS

Adults who wrote about positive relationships, positive attitudes, enjoyment, coping, health maintenance, and planning tended to have better cardiovascular health in unadjusted models concurrently and longitudinally. In fully adjusted models, health maintenance (p < .001) and planning and organization (p = .004) were associated with better cardiovascular health concurrently. Additionally, health maintenance (p = .03) and work (p = .04) were associated with better cardiovascular health longitudinally.

CONCLUSIONS

Individuals who endorsed maintaining their health as central to well-being showed healthier cardiovascular outcomes 12 years later. Combining qualitative assessments of sources of well-being with clinically assessed measures of cardiovascular health highlights unique contributors of well-being that are relevant for health and may not be evident with conventional self-report measures.

Volunteering and Risk of Heart Attack in Later Life: The Moderating Role of Purpose in Life?

Objectives: We investigate whether volunteering is associated with a reduced risk of first heart attack in later life and whether purpose in life moderates this relationship. Methods: Cox proportional hazards were used to examine seven waves of data (2006-2018) from the Health and Retirement Study-a nationally representative survey of adults 50 years and older (N = 5,079). Results: Volunteering a moderate number of hours was associated with a 46% lower risk of heart attack compared to non-volunteers. The association between high time-commitment volunteering and heart attack risk was contingent on level of purpose in life: compared to non-volunteers, people with high purpose in life who volunteered 100 + hours had the lowest risk of heart attack. Discussion: Meaningful volunteer activities may be one way for older adults to reduce their risk of heart attack.

Risk Factors for Cardiovascular Disease: Knowledge Gained from the Hispanic Community Health Study/Study of Latinos

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The Hispanic Community Health Study/Study of Latinos (HCHS/SOL) has made important contributions on the prevalence of and factors associated with cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factors among diverse Hispanic/Latino adults in the US. This article summarizes the knowledge gained thus far on major CVD risk factors from this landmark study.

RECENT FINDINGS

HCHS/SOL demonstrated the sizeable burdens of CVD risk in all major Hispanic/Latino groups in the US, as well as the marked variations in prevalence of hypertension, hypercholesterolemia, diabetes, obesity, and smoking by sex and background. It also identified sociodemographic, lifestyle, and sociocultural characteristics associated with risk factors. HCHS/SOL has yielded an expanding body of literature on characteristics associated with adverse CVD risk factors in this population. Long-term follow-up of this cohort will shed further light on the observed heterogeneity in CVD risk across Hispanic/Latino groups and identify specific risk/protective factors driving these variations.

Optimizing Prepregnancy Cardiovascular Health to Improve Outcomes in Pregnant and Postpartum Individuals and Offspring: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association

This scientific statement summarizes the available preclinical, epidemiological, and clinical trial evidence that supports the contributions of prepregnancy (and interpregnancy) cardiovascular health to risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes and cardiovascular disease in birthing individuals and offspring. Unfavorable cardiovascular health, as originally defined by the American Heart Association in 2010 and revised in 2022, is prevalent in reproductive-aged individuals. Significant disparities exist in ideal cardiovascular health by race and ethnicity, socioeconomic status, and geography. Because the biological processes leading to adverse pregnancy outcomes begin before conception, interventions focused only during pregnancy may have limited impact on both the pregnant individual and offspring. Therefore, focused attention on the prepregnancy period as a critical life period for optimization of cardiovascular health is needed. This scientific statement applies a life course and intergenerational framework to measure, modify, and monitor prepregnancy cardiovascular health. All clinicians who interact with pregnancy-capable individuals can emphasize optimization of cardiovascular health beginning early in childhood. Clinical trials are needed to investigate prepregnancy interventions to comprehensively target cardiovascular health. Beyond individual-level interventions, community-level interventions must include and engage key stakeholders (eg, community leaders, birthing individuals, families) and target a broad range of antecedent psychosocial and social determinants. In addition, policy-level changes are needed to dismantle structural racism and to improve equitable and high-quality health care delivery because many reproductive-aged individuals have inadequate, fragmented health care before and after pregnancy and between pregnancies (interpregnancy). Leveraging these opportunities to target cardiovascular health has the potential to improve health across the life course and for subsequent generations.

Volunteer Engagement and Systemic Inflammation: Does Helping Others Benefit Oneself?

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Although research on the health benefits of volunteering has proliferated, most studies are cross-sectional and rely on self-reported measures of health. Drawing from role theory, the objectives of this study are to examine if (a) volunteering engagement is related to systemic inflammation in later life, as measured by C-reactive protein (CRP); (b) the effect of volunteering varies by age; and (c) volunteering is related to change in CRP over time.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

This study uses 4 waves of data from the Health and Retirement Study, a nationally representative survey of adults 50 years or older. Nested linear regression models were used to examine the relationship between volunteer engagement and CRP concentration in later life. Residualized regression models were used to examine the effects of volunteer engagement on change in CRP.

RESULTS

Results revealed that volunteering is modestly associated with lower CRP concentration, but only for respondents 65+. Highly engaged volunteers had lower CRP than both mid-level and nonvolunteers. Longitudinal analyses revealed a leveling of the beneficial effect of volunteering by age, indicative of reduced returns among the oldest respondents in our sample.

DISCUSSION AND IMPLICATIONS

These results support previous studies that volunteering, and doing so at a high engagement level, is associated with slightly lower levels of CRP. Leaders in medicine, public health, and social services should consider implementing volunteering programs for older adults.