The role of rivaroxaban in left ventricular thrombi

Reduced-Dose Apixaban in the Treatment of Left Ventricular Thrombus: A Report of 2 Cases

According to the American College of Cardiology and the American Heart Association, warfarin has historically been the standard of care anticoagulant for the treatment of left ventricular thrombus. The use of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) has become more prevalent, as they require less frequent laboratory monitoring, offer fixed-dose regimens, are associated with fewer drug-drug and drug-food interactions, and provide more favorable safety profiles when compared to warfarin. However, DOACs are not currently FDA-indicated in the treatment of left ventricular (LV) thrombus. Numerous recent studies have reported and evaluated the use of DOACs for treatment of LV thrombus. Recently, a prospective, open-label, multicenter study evaluated warfarin compared to DOACs for LV thrombus treatment. The AHA recently published a scientific statement regarding the management of patients at risk for and with left ventricular thrombus, which included DOACs as a reasonable alternative to warfarin. This report describes two patients treated with DOACs following LV thrombus diagnosis. The first case is a 71-year-old male admitted for cerebrovascular accident and non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction complicated by a LV thrombus. The second case is an 83-year-old female admitted for acute myocardial infarction complicated with an LV thrombus. Both patients were prescribed apixaban 2.5 mg twice daily. Neither patient has experienced LV thrombus or DOAC treatment related complications. This case series serves as evidence for reduced-dose DOACs as an alternative to warfarin in the treatment of LV thrombus.

A Meta-Analysis Comparing Different Oral Anticoagulation for the Treatment of Ventricular Thrombus

Background

Patients with ventricular thrombus (VT) require anticoagulation therapy and it remains unknown that whether non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) or vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) are more effective.

Objective

We aimed to compare the effectiveness and safety of NOACs with VKAs on the rate of thrombus resolution and clinical outcomes.

Methods

MEDLINE, PUBMED, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, China National Knowledge Infrastructure Database and Wanfang Database, were searched up to November 22, 2021. The primary outcome was the rate of thrombus resolution, and the secondary outcomes were bleeding, stroke or systemic embolism (SSE), stroke and all-cause death. Odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidential intervals (CI) were used for the pooled results.

Results

Eighteen studies with 1755 participants (NOACs, n = 607; VKAs, n = 1148) were included. There were no significant differences in thrombus resolution (OR 0.92, 95% CI 0.68-1.23, p = 0.558), bleeding (OR 0.85, 95% CI 0.54-1.35, p = 0.496), SSE (OR 0.77, 95% CI 0.41-1.43, p = 0.401), stroke (OR 0.65, 95% CI 0.29-1.49, p = 0.312) or all-cause death (OR 1.02, 95% CI 0.63-1.67, p = 0.925) between NOACs and VKAs. Subgroup analyses showed a statistics difference in thrombus resolution between NOACs and VKAs among studies which enrolled patients with or without dabigatran (Yes: OR 0.80, 95% CI 0.59-1.08; No: OR 1.48, 95% CI 1.00-2.19; p = 0.01), while no significances were observed according to baseline characteristics.

Conclusions

Our findings showed that NOACs were comparable to VKAs in thrombus resolution as well as clinical outcomes. In studies that enrolled patients without dabigatran, the thrombus resolution seemed to be greater in NOACs group than VKAs group. And in different proportion of baseline left ventricular ejection fraction, history of ischemic cardiomyopathy and combination with antiplatelet, the thrombus resolution among the two groups remained similar.

Direct Oral Anticoagulants Versus Vitamin K Antagonists in the Treatment of Left Ventricular Thrombi

Left ventricular thrombi form due to the presence of Virchow's triad in patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction. This complication increases the incidence of systemic embolization, hence anticoagulation is recommended to decrease this risk. Up to the present time, vitamin K antagonists are recommended by all societal guidelines for patients with left ventricular thrombi. Recently, several studies have investigated the role of different anticoagulants and yielded promising outcomes. This opinion article focuses on the evidence supporting vitamin K antagonists and direct oral anticoagulants in patients with left ventricular thrombi.

Switching from warfarin to direct-acting oral anticoagulants: it is time to move forward!

Oral vitamin K antagonists (VKAs), warfarin, have been in routine clinical use for almost 70 years for various cardiovascular conditions. Direct-Acting Oral Anticoagulants (DOACs) have emerged as competitive alternatives for VKAs to prevent stroke in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (AF) and have become the preferred choice in several clinical indications for anticoagulation. Recent guidelines have limited the use of DOACs to patients with non-valvular AF to reduce the risk of cardioembolic complications and to treat venous thromboembolism (VTE). Although emerging evidence is suggestive of its high efficacy, there was a lack of data to support DOACs safety profile in patients with mechanical valve prosthesis, intracardiac thrombi, or other conditions such as cardiac device implantation or catheter ablation. Therefore, several clinical trials have been conducted to assess the beneficial effects of using DOACs, instead of VKAs, for various non-guideline-approved indications. This review aimed to discuss the current guideline-approved indications for DOACs, advantages, and limitations of DOACs use in various clinical indications highlighting the potential emerging indications and remaining challenges for DOACs use. Several considerations are in favour of switching from warfarin to DOACs including superior efficacy, better adverse effect profile, fewer drug-drug interactions, and they do not require frequent international normalized ratio (INR) monitoring. Large randomized controlled trials are required to determine the safety and efficacy of their use in various clinical indications.

Treatment and outcomes in patients with left ventricular thrombus - experiences from the Aga Khan University Hospital, Nairobi - Kenya

Introduction

left ventricular thrombus (LVT) may lead to thromboembolism and has been associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Little is known about the incidence, etiology and outcomes in patients with LVT in Africa. The objective was to determine the etiology, treatment practices, rate of resolution and clinical outcomes in patients with LVT in the region.

Methods

a review of all echocardiograms performed in 2017 and 2018 at the Aga Khan University Hospital, Nairobi was carried out and patients with LVT identified. Physician review of charts was performed to document clinical characteristics and outcomes.

Results

during the study period 100 patients with LVT were identified (1.3% of adult echoes). The mean LVEF was 28.5% (±11.0%) and 88 (88%) patients had an LVEF of less than 40%. Underlying etiology of LV dysfunction was post myocardial infarction (MI) in 28 (28%), chronic ischemic cardiomyopathy in 42(42%) and non-ischemic cardiomyopathy in 30 (30%) patients. In 15 (15%) patients a stroke or TIA predated the diagnosis of LVT. Long term anticoagulation was given to 92 (92%) patients. Among these, 34 (37%) received warfarin while 58 (63%) were treated with a DOAC. In the 64 patients who had reassessment imaging (median duration 177 days), complete thrombus resolution was noted in 38 (59.4%). One-year clinical outcome data was available for 85 patients: 13 (15.3%) patients had died, 4 (4.7%) had suffered a stroke, and 8(9.4%) had had a bleeding episode. Rates of thrombus resolution (warfarin 64%, DOAC 55.6%, p=0.51), stroke (warfarin 2.9%, DOAC 1.7%, p=1.0) and bleeding (warfarin 5.9%, DOAC 5.2%, p = 1.00 were not significantly different among patients treated with warfarin and DOAC.

Conclusion

we noted a high incidence of LVT compared to contemporary Western series. The majority of our patients were treated with DOACs. There were no significant differences in outcomes between patients treated with a DOAC and those receiving warfarin. Prospective evaluation on the efficacy and safety of DOACs for this indication is needed.

Ventricular non-compaction review

Left ventricular non-compaction cardiomyopathy (LVNC) is a rare and unclassified cardiomyopathy that carries the potential to cause heart failure, arrhythmias, and embolic events within adults. The diagnosis of this cardiomyopathy can be based off a variety of echocardiographic, cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR), and computed tomography (CT) imaging criteria; none of which have been standardized to establish a firm diagnosis. This is further complicated by the observation from prior studies that LVNC may present as different forms of cardiomyopathy, each with its own subset of nuances that may change treatment strategies. Management of such cardiomyopathy has been debated in terms of anticoagulation, electrophysiologic studies to prevent arrhythmia, as well as heart failure prevention. Not enough data exists in regard to establishing firm guidelines for management. The following article aims to provide a comprehensive review in regard to the etiologies, pathogenesis, diagnostic criteria, management, and treatment of LVNC.

The Role of Direct Oral Anticoagulants Versus Vitamin K Antagonists in the Treatment of Left Ventricular Thrombi: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have a well-established role in the treatment of deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism and in the reduction of thromboembolism in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. However, limited evidence supports their role in patients with left ventricular thrombi.

METHODS

The PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases were searched for relevant articles published from inception to 1 August 2020. We included studies evaluating the effect of DOACs versus vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) in patients with left ventricular thrombi. The primary outcome was thrombus resolution, and the secondary outcomes were major bleeding and stroke or systemic embolization (SSE).

RESULTS

Five retrospective observational studies were included, with a total of 857 patients. VKAs and DOACs had a similar rate of thrombus resolution (odds ratio [OR] 0.97; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.57-1.65; p = 0.90). Our analysis also demonstrated a similar rate of major bleeding (OR 0.62; 95% CI 0.27-1.44; p = 0.27) and SSE (OR 1.86; 95% CI 0.99-3.50; p = 0.05) between the two treatment groups.

CONCLUSION

In patients with left ventricular thrombi, DOACs and VKAs are associated with similar rates of thrombus resolution, major bleeding, and SSE.

Rivaroxaban versus warfarin for the management of left ventricle thrombus

Background

Rivaroxaban has been recently introduced for the management of non-valvular intra-cardiac thrombosis with variable results. We aimed to compare the results of the off-label use of rivaroxaban versus warfarin in the management of patients with left ventricle (LV) thrombus. This research is a retrospective study conducted on 63 patients who had LV thrombus from January to December 2016. We compared patients treated with warfarin (n=35) to patients who had rivaroxaban (n=28), and study outcomes were time to thrombus resolution, bleeding, stroke, and mortality.

Results

The median duration of treatment was 9.5 (25th-75th percentiles: 6-32.5) months for rivaroxaban and 14 (3-41) months for warfarin. Thrombus resolution occurred in 24 patients in the warfarin group (68.6%) and 20 patients in the rivaroxaban group (71.4%). The median time to resolution in the warfarin group was 9 (4-20) months and 3 (2-11.5) months in the rivaroxaban group. Thrombus resolution was significantly faster in patients on rivaroxaban (p= 0.019). Predictors of thrombus resolution were thrombus surface area (HR: 1.21; CI 95% (1.0-1.46); p= .048) and the use of rivaroxaban (HR: 1.92; CI 95% (1.01-3.65); p= 0.048). There was no difference in stroke, bleeding, and mortality between both groups.

Conclusion

Rivaroxaban was as effective and safe as warfarin in managing patients with left ventricle thrombus. Larger randomized clinical trials are recommended to confirm our findings.

Mesenteric ischemia following large left ventricular fibroid thrombosis due to myocardial infarction: A case report

•

Left ventricular thrombosis (LVT) is commonly seen in patients with decreased systolic function.

•

The patient was underwent mesenteric ischemia during hospitalization but the diagnosis of mesenteric ischemia prior to the patient's visit is not unlikely.

Introduction

Left ventricular thrombosis is a common complication of acute myocardial infarction, usually occurring after anterior ST-elevation myocardial infarction, akinesis, and extensive dyskinesia of the apex, anterolateral, or anteroseptal. In this article, we report a case of myocardial infarction with left ventricular thrombosis.

Case presentation

A 45-year-old man was referred to our hospital with complaints of severe epigastric pain, sweating, fever, and tachycardia. In laboratory tests, findings for triose phosphate isomerase enzyme were negative, but on electrocardiography, the Q wave in the V1 and V2 leads and the biphasic T wave in the V2, V3, and V4 leads were evident. In Akinesian echocardiography, apical segmentation with a large organic, mobile, pedunculated thrombosis measuring 1.7 × 1.9 cm² and an ejection fraction of 40% were reported. The patient then underwent emergency open cardiac surgery through a central sternotomy to remove the thrombosis.

Clinical discussion

The clinical manifestations of left ventricular thrombosis include cerebral thromboembolism and systemic distal embolization, which are dangerous despite surgery. The echocardiography revealed that the left ventricular keratosis had been surgically removed through ventriculotomy. The patient experienced mesenteric ischemia during hospitalization, and due to the initial presentation of severe abdominal pain, it is not uncommon for the patient to be diagnosed with mesenteric ischemia before referral. The patient had the following vital signs: SPO₂, 98%; BP, 96/63; PR, 91; RR, 19; and GCS, 10/15 and was treated in the intensive care unit.

Conclusion

Our case highlights the importance of diagnosis and on-time treatment of post-large left ventricular fibroid thrombosis complications.

Off-label Use for Direct Oral Anticoagulants: Valvular Atrial Fibrillation, Heart Failure, Left Ventricular Thrombus, Superficial Vein Thrombosis, Pulmonary Hypertension-a Systematic Review

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate clinical literature for direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) therapy for non-Food and Drug Administration approved indications.

DATA SOURCES

Articles from MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, Google Scholar, and OVID databases were reviewed from 1946 through September 4, 2020.

STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION

Fully published studies assessing DOACs for atrial fibrillation (AF) with valvular heart disease (VHD), heart failure (HF), left ventricular thrombus (LVT), superficial vein thrombosis (SVT), or pulmonary hypertension (PH) were evaluated.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Our review showed that DOACs are safe to use in patients with AF and VHD except for mitral stenosis or mechanical heart valve. Rivaroxaban 2.5 mg twice daily should be used with caution in patients with HF with reduced ejection fraction until further evaluation is performed. Four retrospective studies for DOAC use in patients with LVT showed conflicting results. One phase 3 randomized controlled trial showed noninferiority of rivaroxaban to fondaparinux for SVT treatment. The use of DOACs for pulmonary arterial hypertension was not evaluated in any clinical study, but 2 retrospective studies for the use of DOACs in patients with chronic thromboembolic PH (CTEPH) showed similar efficacy between DOACs and warfarin.

RELEVANCE TO PATIENT CARE AND CLINICAL PRACTICE

This review provides clinicians with a comprehensive literature review surrounding DOAC use in common off-label indications.

CONCLUSION

DOACs can be considered for AF complicated by VHD except for mitral stenosis or mechanical valve replacement. DOACs (especially rivaroxaban) are considered as an alternative therapy for SVT and CTEPH. Further prospective studies for DOAC uses are needed for HF or LVT.

Rationale and design of a prospective multi-center randomized trial of EARLY treatment by rivaroxaban versus warfarin in ST-segment elevation MYOcardial infarction with Left Ventricular Thrombus (EARLY-MYO-LVT trial)

Background

Left ventricular thrombus (LVT), a common complication of acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), is associated with increased risk of systemic embolism and high mortality. Current STEMI guidelines recommend adding anticoagulant therapy to dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) if early-formulated LVT were detected, for which vitamin K antagonist (VKA) is the standard anticoagulant agent. The role of non-VKA oral anticoagulants (NOACs) in this scenario is uncertain.

Methods

The EARLY-MYO-LVT study will be a prospective, multi-center and randomized trial designed to investigate the efficacy and safety of rivaroxaban versus warfarin in the treatment of post-STEMI LVT. It will enroll 280 patients with STEMI who have developed LVT within the first month of symptom onset. They will be randomized at 1:1 ratio into the group of rivaroxaban 15 mg daily or VKA treatment (with targeted INR 2–2.5) on the basis of standard DAPT (100 mg daily aspirin plus 75 mg daily clopidogrel) for 3–6 months. The primary efficacy endpoint will be the probability of LVT resolution after 3-month triple therapy, and the principal safety outcome will be the incidence of major bleeding events during the treatment.

Discussion

The described study will systemically assess the efficacy and safety of NOACs-based anticoagulant therapy in the treatment of LVT subsequent to STEMI.

Trial registration

The EARLY-MYO-LVT trial (Clinical trial number: NCT03764241).

Will Direct Oral Anticoagulants Have a Chance in Prosthetic Valves?

Although there are abundant data highlighting the safety and efficacy of direct oral anticoagulants, to date, recent guidelines have limited their use to stroke prevention in patients with non-valvular AF, as well as in the prevention and treatment of venous thromboembolism and pulmonary embolism. Encouraging data about the off-label use of direct oral anticoagulants have been shown in several other indications, such as intracardiac thrombi, left ventricular thrombi and left atrial appendage, but a large sector of patients are still not addressed, such as valvular and prosthetic patients.

Use of dabigatran for treatment of left ventricular thrombus: A tertiary care center experience

OBJECTIVES

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are now replacing vitamin K oral anticoagulants (VKAs) owing to superior efficacy, rapid action, less bleeding, wider therapeutic range,and fewer food and drug interactions.Unfortunately, the available data on the use of DOACs, particularly dabigatran, for treatment of left ventricular thrombus (LVT) issparse. We have hereby presented the largest study on use of dabigatran in LVT.

METHODS

Retrospective data of patients having LVT as diagnosed by transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) was screened. Patients on dabigatran were included in the study and follow up data of 6 months was obtained through medical records.

RESULTS

Of the 15 patients included in the study, the most frequent etiology was ischemic heart disease (67%), including 7 patients of STEMI (47%), followed by non-ischemic cardiomyopathy in 5 patients (33%). Only one patient, with STEMI, developed mild gastrointestinal bleeding at 3 months. Complete clot resolution was seen in 2 patients (13%) at first week of follow up and total 5 patients (33%) at the end of second week. The rate of clot resolution at 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months were 80%, 93% and 100%, respectively. The median duration required for complete clot resolution was 30 days (IQR=14-30).

CONCLUSION

Dabigatran appears to be safe, highly efficacious and results in rapid LV clot resolution. DOACs may be a suitable alternative to warfarin in treatment of LV thrombus. However, larger studies are required to validate this hypothesis.