Optimal Treatment Decision for Brain Metastases of Unknown Primary Origin: The Role and Timing of Radiosurgery

Brain tumor and mood disorders: a retrospective analysis of anxiety and depression in patients with primary and metastatic brain tumors

Brain tumors are associated with a dismal prognosis, and the diagnosis often evokes significant psychological distress. However, the progression of emotional well-being throughout the clinical course of brain tumors remains poorly understood. This study aims to assess the prevalence of anxiety and depression in brain tumor patients and to identify the risk factors associated with postoperative emotional derangement in glioma and metastatic groups seperately. Psychological conditions were evaluated using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) at various preoperative and postoperative time points. A total of 159 patients who underwent surgery and HADS assessment between May 2018 and November 2020 were included in the analysis, comprising 112 glioma patients and 47 metastatic brain tumor patients. After surgery, the incidence of anxiety and depression increased in both the glioma and the metastatic brain tumor group. In both groups, tumors involving the frontal lobe were associated with a significant increase in postoperative HADS depression scores, whereas involvement of other lobes did not significantly affect postoperative HADS scores. Additionally, postoperative HADS scores did not differ significantly among gliomas of different grades. Among glioma patients, univariate analysis indicated that left-sided tumors were associated with an increased risk of postoperative depression worsening. In the metastatic group, a BMI > 24 was identified as a risk factor for postoperative anxiety exacerbation. The findings from this study highlight clinical characteristics associated with a higher risk of postoperative psychological disturbance, aiding in early prevention and tailored care to improve the quality of life for patients with intracranial tumors.

Multiple recurrences of unknown primary tumor in a meningioma: A case report

Metastasis of a systemic tumor into a primary brain tumor has been rarely reported in the literature. These metastases could be seen mostly in meningiomas and in less frequently in the other intracranial tumors. Carcinoma of an unknown primary site (CUP) metastasizing into an intracranial meningioma is not a common occasion. According to the best of our knowledge, in this report, we present the first case with multiple recurrent CUP, which metastasized to intracranial meningioma, reported in the literature. The whole body was investigated with FDG PET/CT and biomarkers of the most common carcinomas for primary cancer. However, these tests showed no primary affected region. Despite all adjuvant therapies, the tumor had multiple recurrences. Such cases are still a challenge to offer optimal management.

A transformer-based deep-learning approach for classifying brain metastases into primary organ sites using clinical whole-brain MRI images

Treatment decisions for brain metastatic disease rely on knowledge of the primary organ site and are currently made with biopsy and histology. Here, we develop a deep-learning approach for accurate non-invasive digital histology with whole-brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data. Contrast-enhanced T1-weighted and fast spoiled gradient echo brain MRI exams (n = 1,582) were preprocessed and input to the proposed deep-learning workflow for tumor segmentation, modality transfer, and primary site classification into one of five classes. Tenfold cross-validation generated an overall area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.878 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.873,0.883). These data establish that whole-brain imaging features are discriminative enough to allow accurate diagnosis of the primary organ site of malignancy. Our end-to-end deep radiomic approach has great potential for classifying metastatic tumor types from whole-brain MRI images. Further refinement may offer an invaluable clinical tool to expedite primary cancer site identification for precision treatment and improved outcomes.

Cerebral metastases

Brain metastases are common and deadly. Over the last 25 years GKNS has been established as an invaluable treatment. It may be used as a primary treatment or after either surgery or WBRT. Patients are assessed using one of a number of available scales. GKNS may be repeated for new metastases and for unresponsive tumors. Prescription doses are usually between 18 and 20Gy. The use of advanced MR techniques to highlight sensitive structures like the hippocampi have extended the efficacy of the treatment. More recently GKNS has been used with different target therapies with improved results. More recently frameless treatments have become more popular in this group of very sick patients. GKNS controls tumors in between 80% and over 95% of cases and may even be used for brainstem tumors.

Anatomical and topographical variations in the distribution of brain metastases based on primary cancer origin and molecular subtypes: a systematic review

Background

While it has been suspected that different primary cancers have varying predilections for metastasis in certain brain regions, recent advances in neuroimaging and spatial modeling analytics have facilitated further exploration into this field.

Methods

A systematic electronic database search for studies analyzing the distribution of brain metastases (BMs) from any primary systematic cancer published between January 1990 and July 2020 was conducted using PRISMA guidelines.

Results

Two authors independently reviewed 1957 abstracts, 46 of which underwent full-text analysis. A third author arbitrated both lists; 13 studies met inclusion/exclusion criteria. All were retrospective single- or multi-institution database reviews analyzing over 8227 BMs from 2599 patients with breast (8 studies), lung (7 studies), melanoma (5 studies), gastrointestinal (4 studies), renal (3 studies), and prostate (1 study) cancers. Breast, lung, and colorectal cancers tended to metastasize to more posterior/caudal topographic and vascular neuroanatomical regions, particularly the cerebellum, with notable differences based on subtype and receptor expression. HER-2-positive breast cancers were less likely to arise in the frontal lobes or subcortical region, while ER-positive and PR-positive breast metastases were less likely to arise in the occipital lobe or cerebellum. BM from lung adenocarcinoma tended to arise in the frontal lobes and squamous cell carcinoma in the cerebellum. Melanoma metastasized more to the frontal and temporal lobes.

Conclusion

The observed topographical distribution of BM likely develops based on primary cancer type, molecular subtype, and genetic profile. Further studies analyzing this association and relationships to vascular distribution are merited to potentially improve patient treatment and outcomes.

Seizures in Patients With Metastatic Brain Tumors: Prevalence, Clinical Characteristics, and Features on EEG

INTRODUCTION

Metastases to the brain (MB) occur in up to 30% of adults with cancer; of these, 15% to 35% may have seizures. We investigated clinical and pathologic associations with seizure and EEG findings in patients with MB, given the sparse literature in this area.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective chart review of adults with pathologically confirmed MB treated at a large tertiary care center between April 8, 2006, and December 14, 2018. Primary outcomes were odds of "chart-documented seizure" (CDS) in the full sample and EEG-captured seizure or any epileptiform discharges among those monitored on EEG.

RESULTS

We studied 187 patients with MB, of whom 55 (28.3%) were monitored on EEG. We found an overall CDS prevalence of 29.4% and an EEG-captured seizure of 18.9% among patients monitored on EEG. Of those monitored on EEG, 47.2% had epileptiform discharges. Adenocarcinoma pathology was associated with lower odds of CDS (odds ratio [OR] 0.50, 95% CI 0.26-0.96) and EEG-captured seizure (OR 0.09, 95% CI 0.01-0.87) versus other pathologies. When modeled separately, melanoma pathology was associated with CDS (OR 4.45, 95% CI 1.58-12.57) versus other pathologies. Hemorrhagic MB were associated with any epileptiform discharges (OR 5.50, 95% CI 1.65-18.37), regardless of pathology modeled. Increasing size of the largest dimension of the largest MB was associated with lower odds of CDS (OR 0.68, 95% CI 0.52-0.89 when adenocarcinoma modeled, OR 0.69, 95% CI 0.53-0.91 when melanoma modeled).

CONCLUSIONS

Seizures and epileptiform discharges are common in patients with MB. Tumor size and pathology were significantly associated with CDS. Larger studies are needed for further analysis.

Brain Metastasis from Unknown Primary Tumour: Moving from Old Retrospective Studies to Clinical Trials on Targeted Agents

Simple Summary

Brain metastases (BMs) are the most common intracranial tumours in adults and occur up to 3–10 times more frequently than primary brain tumours. In up to 15% of patients with BM, the primary tumour cannot be identified. These cases are known as BM of cancer of unknown primary (CUP) (BM-CUP). The understanding of BM-CUP, despite its relative frequency and unfavourable outcome, is still incomplete and clear indications on management are missing. The aim of this review is to summarize current evidence on the diagnosis and treatment of BM-CUP.

Abstract

Brain metastases (BMs) are the most common intracranial tumours in adults and occur up to 3–10 times more frequently than primary brain tumours. BMs may be the cause of the neurological presenting symptoms in patients with otherwise previously undiagnosed cancer. In up to 15% of patients with BMs, the primary tumour cannot be identified. These cases are known as BM of cancer of unknown primary (CUP) (BM-CUP). CUP has an early and aggressive metastatic spread, poor response to chemotherapy, and poor prognosis. The pathogenesis of CUP seems to be characterized by a specific underlying pro-metastatic signature. The understanding of BM-CUP, despite its relative frequency and unfavourable outcome, is still incomplete and clear indications on management are missing. Advances in diagnostic tools, molecular characterization, and target therapy have shifted the paradigm in the approach to metastasis from CUP: while earlier studies stressed the importance of finding the primary tumour and deciding on treatment based on the primary diagnosis, most recent studies focus on the importance of identifying targetable molecular markers in the metastasis itself. The aim of this review is to summarize current evidence on BM-CUP, from the diagnosis and pathogenesis to the treatment, with a focus on available studies and ongoing clinical trials.

Pineal Gland Metastasis From Poorly Differentiated Carcinoma of Unknown Primary Origin

Pineal metastasis is an exceedingly rare finding in patients with systemic malignancies. Such lesions are typically the manifestation of a primary lung cancer; nonetheless, a variety of malignancies have been reported to disseminate to the pineal gland including gastrointestinal, endocrine, and skin cancers, among others. However, to our knowledge, pineal gland metastasis without a primary origin has yet to be described. Carcinoma of unknown primary origin is a heterogeneous group of cancers characterized by the presence of metastatic disease without an identifiable primary tumor on metastatic workup. Here, we present a case of a 65-year-old male found to have a heterogeneously enhancing lesion of the pineal gland as well as an enhancing lesion of the left cerebellar hemisphere. Comprehensive metastatic workup demonstrated multifocal metastatic adenopathy without an identifiable primary lesion. Stereotactic biopsy of the pineal lesion revealed poorly differentiated carcinoma with an immunophenotype most consistent with gastrointestinal origin. To our knowledge, this is the first case to describe a pineal gland metastasis without a primary origin. We discuss the relevant literature on pineal gland metastases as well as carcinoma of unknown primary origin.

Survival outcomes following craniotomy for intracranial metastases from an unknown primary

Introduction

Management of patients with intracranial metastases from an unknown primary tumor (CUP) varies compared to those with metastases of known primary tumor origin (CKP). The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) recognizes the current lack of research to support the management of CUP patients with brain metastases. The primary aim was to compare survival outcomes of CKP and CUP patients undergoing early resection of intracranial metastases to understand the efficacy of surgery for patients with CUP.

Methods

A retrospective study was performed, wherein patients were identified using a pathology database. Data was collected from patient notes and trust information services. Surgically managed patients during a 10-year period aged over 18 years, with a histological diagnosis of intracranial metastasis, were included.

Results

298 patients were identified, including 243 (82.0%) CKP patients and 55 (18.0%) CUP patients. Median survival for CKP patients was 9 months (95%CI 7.475–10.525); and 6 months for CUP patients (95%CI 4.263–7.737, p = 0.113). Cox regression analyses suggest absence of other metastases (p = 0.016), age (p = 0.005), and performance status (p = 0.001) were positive prognostic factors for improved survival in cases of CUP. The eventual determination of the primary malignancy did not affect overall survival for CUP patients.

Conclusions

There was no significant difference in overall survival between the two groups. Surgical management of patients with CUP brain metastases is an appropriate treatment option. Current diagnostic pathways specifying a thorough search for the primary tumor pre-operatively may not improve patient outcomes.

Capicua Transcriptional Repressor-Rearranged Undifferentiated Round Cell Sarcoma Metastatic to the Brain Treated with Surgery and Stereotactic Radiosurgery

BACKGROUND

Ewing-like sarcoma with capicua transcriptional repressor (CIC) rearrangement is a unique class of undifferentiated round cell sarcomas characterized by CIC-double homeobox 4 gene fusion. Despite showing great histologic resemblance to Ewing sarcomas, they have proved to be a distinct pathological entity from the immunohistochemistry and genetic examinations and the response to treatment. We have presented a case of CIC-rearranged Ewing-like sarcoma with cerebral metastasis managed with operative resection and gamma knife radiosurgery.

CASE DESCRIPTION

A 56-year-old woman had initially presented with an ulcerating lesion of the right fifth toe. The histological and immunohistochemical analysis revealed features consistent with CIC-rearranged Ewing-like sarcoma, which was confirmed with genetic analysis. Despite aggressive local control and a multidrug chemotherapy regimen, the patient developed multifocal metastases involving the lungs, femur, and cerebrum. The cerebral lesions were managed with surgery and gamma knife radiosurgery, with mixed results.

CONCLUSION

CIC-rearranged Ewing-like sarcomas have recently been recognized as a distinct disease entity with a highly aggressive course. Treatment paradigms have yet to be defined to properly manage such an aggressive pathological process.

Operative and peri-operative considerations in the management of brain metastasis

The number of patients who develop metastatic brain lesions is increasing as the diagnosis and treatment of systemic cancers continues to improve, resulting in longer patient survival. The role of surgery in the management of brain metastasis (BM), particularly multiple and recurrent metastases, remains controversial and continues to evolve. However, with appropriate patient selection, outcomes after surgery are typically favorable. In addition, surgery is the only means to obtain a tissue diagnosis and is the only effective treatment modality to quickly relieve neurological complications or life-threatening symptoms related to significant mass effect, CSF obstruction, and peritumoral edema. As such, a thorough understanding of the role of surgery in patients with metastatic brain lesions, as well as the factors associated with surgical outcomes, is essential for the effective management of this unique and growing patient population.

Advances in the management of brain metastases from cancer of unknown primary

Cancer of unknown primary accounts for 3-5% of all cancers for which an adequate investigation does not identify the primary tumor. The particular subset of brain metastasis in cancer of unknown primary (BMCUP) is a clinical challenge that lacks standardized diagnostic and therapeutic options. It is diagnosed predominantly in male patients in the sixth decade of age with complaints of headache, neurological dysfunction, cognitive and behavioral disturbances and seizures. The therapeutic approach to patients with BMCUP relies on local control and systemic treatment. Surgery or stereotactic radiosurgery and/or whole brain radiation therapy seems to be the cornerstone of the treatment approach to BMCUP. Systemic therapy remains essential as cancers of unknown primary are conceptually metastatic tumors. The benefits of chemotherapy were disappointing whereas those of targeted therapies and immune checkpoint inhibitors remain to be evaluated. In this Review, we address the advances in the diagnosis and treatment of BMCUP.

Malignant Glioma in the Cerebellum Presenting as Multiple Small Lesions

Malignant glioma, the most common malignant primary brain tumor in adults, usually occurs in supratentorial space as a single mass lesion, and cerebellar location and multiple appearance are uncommon. We report a case of a 69-year-old female with three lesions simultaneously found in the cerebellum on magnetic resonance images (MRIs) after suffering from gait disturbance. Two lesions were around 15 mm in size and the other one was observed as a spotty enhancement. Although MRI findings suggested brain metastases, whole body examinations denied any primary malignancies. Biopsy for one lesion in the cerebellum was performed, which resulted in pathological diagnosis of malignant astrocytoma. The lesions were considered multicentric glioma based on MRI definition. The treatment with temozolomide and whole brain radiation was completed. Although the patient was discharged in an independent state with the shrinkage of the tumors, she unexpectedly died following sudden loss of consciousness from an unknown cause one month after discharge. The coincidence of cerebellar location and multicentricity characterized by smallness is quite rare in glioma patients, and such MRI findings might be misleading for the diagnosis. We describe the details of the case and discuss the pathogenesis of this unique presentation of malignant glioma with the literatures.

Gamma Knife Radiosurgery for Metastatic Brain Tumors from Cancer of Unknown Primary

OBJECTIVE

We retrospectively analyzed treatment efficacy and identified prognostic factors impacting tumor control and survival in patients with brain metastases from cancer of unknown primary (CUP) treated with gamma knife radiosurgery (GKRS).

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 87 patients with 520 tumors who underwent GKRS for brain metastases from CUP.

RESULTS

The median overall survival time after initial GKRS was 6 months. The 6- and 12-month overall survival rates were 79.3% and 14.9%, respectively. Older age (P = 0.002), lower Karnofsky Performance Status Index score (P = 0.026), extracranial metastases (P = 0.013), and multiple brain metastases (P = 0.007) were significantly correlated with shorter survival periods. The 6- and 12-month neurologic death rates were 25.3% and 32.2%, respectively. The 6- and 12-month neurologic deterioration rates were 24.1% and 27.6%, respectively. The 6- and 12-month distant brain control failure rates were 21.8% and 24.1%, respectively. The median tumor volume was 1.7 cm³. The median marginal prescription dose was 18 Gy. The 6- and 12-month tumor recurrence rates were 5.1% and 15.7%, respectively. Larger tumor volume (P < 0.0001) and lower prescription dose (P = 0.001) were significantly correlated with local tumor control failure. Seven patients had symptomatic radiation injury. The 6- and 12-month GKRS-related complication rates were both 6.9%.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest that GKRS is a relatively effective and safe treatment for control of tumor progression in patients with brain metastases from CUP. Overall and neurologic survivals were short, but we recommend GKRS treatment to prevent early neurologic dysfunction and death in patients with CUP.