Long-term Effects of Bilateral Subthalamic Deep Brain Stimulation on Postural Instability and Gait Difficulty in Patients with Parkinson's Disease

Effects of subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation using different frequency programming paradigms on axial symptoms in advanced Parkinson's disease

BACKGROUND

In advanced Parkinson's disease (PD), axial symptoms are common and can be debilitating. Although deep brain stimulation (DBS) significantly improves motor symptoms, conventional high-frequency stimulation (HFS) has limited effectiveness in improving axial symptoms. In this study, we investigated the effects on multiple axial symptoms after DBS surgery with three different frequency programming paradigms comprising HFS, low-frequency stimulation (LFS), and variable-frequency stimulation (VFS).

METHODS

This study involved PD patients who had significant preoperative axial symptoms and underwent bilateral subthalamic nucleus (STN) DBS. Axial symptoms, motor symptoms, medications, and quality of life were evaluated preoperatively (baseline). One month after surgery, HFS was applied. At 6 months post-surgery, HFS assessments were performed, and HFS was switched to LFS. A further month later, we conducted LFS assessments and switched LFS to VFS. At 8 months after surgery, VFS assessments were performed.

RESULTS

Of the 21 PD patients initially enrolled, 16 patients were ultimately included in this study. Regarding HFS, all axial symptoms except for the Berg Balance Scale (p < 0.0001) did not improve compared with the baseline (all p > 0.05). As for LFS and VFS, all axial symptoms improved significantly compared with both the baseline and HFS (all p < 0.05). Moreover, motor symptoms and medications were significantly better than the baseline (all p < 0.05) after using LFS and VFS. Additionally, the quality of life of the PD patients after receiving LFS and VFS was significantly better than at the baseline and with HFS (all p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

Our findings indicate that HFS is ineffective at improving the majority of axial symptoms in advanced PD. However, both the LFS and VFS programming paradigms exhibit significant improvements in various axial symptoms.

Frequency settings of subthalamic nucleus DBS for Parkinson's disease: A systematic review and network meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) is an effective treatment for the motor symptoms of Parkinson's Disease. The targeted physiological structure for lead location is commonly the subthalamic nucleus (STN). The efficacy of DBS for improving motor symptoms is assessed via the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating III Scale (UPDRS-III). In this study, we sought to compare the efficacy of frequency settings utilized for STN-DBS.

METHODS

Following PRISMA Guidelines, a search on PUBMED and MEDLINE was performed to include full-length randomized controlled trials evaluating STN-DBS. The frequency stimulation parameters and Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS-III) outcomes were extracted in the search. High-frequency stimulation (HFS) was defined as ≥100 Hz and low-frequency stimulation (LFS) was defined as <100 Hz. A frequentist network meta-analysis was performed with odds ratios (OR) and pooling performed using the Mantel-Haenszel method. Statistics are presented as OR [95% CI].

RESULTS

15 studies consisting of 298 patients were included for analysis. Bilateral HFS -0.68 [-0.89; -0.46] was associated with better UPDRS-III scores compared to bilateral LFS. On the other hand, bilateral LFS with medications (MEDS) was favored over HFS with MEDS (-0.28 [-0.63; 0.07]). Bilateral LFS and MEDS, HFS and MEDS, stimulation (STIM) OFF MEDS ON, HFS, LFS, STIM OFF MEDS OFF UPDRS outcomes were ranked from best to worst outcomes.

DISCUSSION

The outcomes of this study suggest that bilateral HFS has better utility for those with no response to medication, while LFS has additive benefits to medication by improving unique symptoms via different neurophysiological mechanisms.

Unlocking potential: low frequency subthalamic nucleus stimulation enhances executive function in Parkinson's disease patients with postural instability/gait disturbance

Postural instability/gait disturbance (PIGD) is very common in advanced Parkinson's disease, and associated with cognitive dysfunction. Research suggests that low frequency (5-12 Hz) subthalamic nucleus-deep brain stimulation (STN-DBS) could improve cognition in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD). However, the clinical effectiveness of low frequency stimulation in PIGD patients has not been explored. This study was designed in a double-blinded randomized cross-over manner, aimed to verify the effect of low frequency STN-DBS on cognition of PIGD patients. Twenty-nine PIGD patients with STN-DBS were tested for cognitive at off (no stimulation), low frequency (5 Hz), and high frequency (130 Hz) stimulation. Neuropsychological tests included the Stroop Color-Word Test (SCWT), Verbal fluency test, Symbol Digital Switch Test, Digital Span Test, and Benton Judgment of Line Orientation test. For conflict resolution of executive function, low frequency stimulation significantly decreased the completion time of SCWT-C (p = 0.001) and Stroop interference effect (p < 0.001) compared to high frequency stimulation. However, no significant differences among stimulation states were found for other cognitive tests. Here we show, low frequency STN-DBS improved conflict resolution of executive function compared to high frequency. Our results demonstrated the possibility of expanding the treatment coverage of DBS to cognitive function in PIGD, which will facilitate integration of low frequency stimulation into future DBS programming.

WITHDRAWN: Laterality and frequency settings of subthalamic nucleus DBS for Parkinson's disease: A systematic review and network meta-analysis

This article has been withdrawn at the request of the author(s) and/or editor. The Publisher apologizes for any inconvenience this may cause. The full Elsevier Policy on Article Withdrawal can be found at https://www.elsevier.com/about/policies/article-withdrawal.

Smartwatch gait coordination index: New measure for human gait utilizing smartwatch sensor

Human walking reflects the state of human health. Numerous medical studies have been conducted to analyze walking patterns and to diagnose disease progression. However, this process requires expensive equipment and considerable time and manpower. Smartwatches are equipped with gyro sensors to detect human movements and graph-walking patterns. To measure the abnormality in walking using this graph, we developed a smartwatch gait coordination index (SGCI) and examined its usefulness. The phase coordination index was applied to analyze arm movements. Based on previous studies, the phase coordination index formula was applied to graphs obtained from arm movements, showing that arm and leg movements during walking are correlated with each other. To prove this, a smartwatch was worn on the arms and legs of 8 healthy adults and the difference in arm movements was measured. The SGCI values with abnormal walking patterns were compared with the SGCI values obtained during normal walking. In the first experiment, the measured leg SGCI in normal walking averaged 9.002 ± 3.872 and the arm SGCI averaged 9.847 ± 6.115. The movements of both arms and legs showed stable sinusoidal waves. In fact, as a result of performing a paired t test of both exercise phases measured by the strike point using the maximum and minimum values, it was confirmed that the 2 exercises were not statistically different, as it yielded a P value of 0.469 (significance level α = 0.05). The arm SGCI measured after applying the 3 kg weight impairment on 1 leg was 22.167 ± 4.705. It was confirmed that the leg SGCI and 3 kg weight arm SGCI were statistically significant, as it yielded a P value of 0.001 (significance level α = 0.05). The SCGI can be automatically and continuously measured with the gyro sensor of the smartwatch and can be used as an indirect indicator of human walking conditions.

Long-term motor outcomes of deep brain stimulation of the globus pallidus interna in Parkinson's disease patients: Five-year follow-up

BACKGROUND

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) of globus pallidus interna (GPi) is an established treatment for advanced Parkinson's disease (PD). However, in contrast to subthalamic nucleus (STN)-DBS, long-term outcomes of GPi-DBS have rarely been studied.

OBJECTIVE

We investigated the long-term motor outcomes in PD patients at 5 years after GPi-DBS.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data for PD patients who underwent GPi-DBS. Longitudinal changes of UPDRS scores from baseline to 5 years after surgery were assessed.

RESULTS

Forty PD patients with a mean age of 59.5 ± 7.9 years at DBS surgery (mean duration of PD: 11.4 ± 3.4 years) were included at baseline and 25 patients were included in 5-year evaluation after DBS. Compared to baseline, sub-scores for tremor, levodopa-induced dyskinesia (LID), and motor fluctuation indicated improved states up to 5 years after surgery (p < 0.001). However, UPDRS Part 3 total score and sub-score for postural instability and gait disturbance (PIGD) gradually worsened over time until 5 years after surgery (p > 0.017 after Bonferroni correction). In a logistic regression model, only preoperative levodopa response was associated with the long-term benefits on UPDRS Part 3 total score and PIGD sub-score (OR = 1.20; 95% CI = 1.04-1.39; p = 0.015 and OR = 4.99; 95% CI = 1.39-17.89; p = 0.014, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

GPi-DBS provides long-term beneficial effects against tremor, motor fluctuation and LID, but PIGD symptoms gradually worsen. This selective long-term benefit has implications for the optimal application of DBS in PD patients.

Axial impairment and falls in Parkinson’s disease: 15 years of subthalamic deep brain stimulation

In this retrospective study, we longitudinally analyzed axial impairment and falls in people with Parkinson’s disease (PD) and subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation (STN-DBS). Axial scores and falling frequency were examined at baseline, and 1, 10, and 15 years after surgery. Preoperative demographic and clinical data, including PD duration and severity, phenotype, motor and cognitive scales, medications, and vascular changes on neuroimaging were examined as possible risk factors through Kaplan–Meier and Cox regression analyses. Of 302 individuals examined before and at 1 year after surgery, 102 and 57 were available also at 10 and 15 years of follow-up, respectively. Axial scores were similar at baseline and at 1 year but worsened at 10 and 15 years. The prevalence rate of frequent fallers progressively increased from baseline to 15 years. Preoperative axial scores, frontal dysfunction and age at PD onset were risk factors for axial impairment progression after surgery. Axial scores, akinetic/rigid phenotype, age at disease onset and disease duration at surgery predicted frequent falls. Overall, axial signs progressively worsened over the long-term period following STN-DBS, likely related to the progression of PD, especially in a subgroup of subjects with specific risk factors.

The Role of Microelectrode Recording in Deep Brain Stimulation Surgery for Parkinson's Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

STN-DBS is a cornerstone in the treatment of advanced Parkinson's disease (PD). The traditional approach is to use an awake operative technique with microelectrode recording (MER). However, more centers start using an asleep MRI-guided technique without MER.

OBJECTIVE

We systematically reviewed the literature to compare STN-DBS surgery with and without MER for differences in clinical outcome.

METHODS

We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, MEDLINE, and Web of Science databases for randomized clinical trials and consecutive cohort studies published between 01-01-2000 and 26-08-2021, that included at least 10 PD patients who had received bilateral STN-DBS.

RESULTS

2,129 articles were identified. After abstract screening and full-text review, 26 studies were included in the final analysis, comprising a total of 34 study groups (29 MER and 5 non-MER). The standardized mean difference (SMD) in change in motor symptoms between baseline (OFF medication) and 6-24 months follow-up (OFF medication and ON stimulation) was 1.64 for the MER group and 1.87 for non-MER group (p = 0.59). SMD in change in levodopa equivalent daily dose (LEDD) was 1.14 for the MER group and 0.65 for non-MER group (p < 0.01). Insufficient data were available for comparative analysis of PDQ-39 and complications.

CONCLUSION

The change in motor symptoms from baseline to follow-up did not differ between studies that used MER and those that did not. The postoperative reduction in LEDD from baseline to follow-up was greater in the MER-group. In the absence of high-quality studies comparing both methods, there is a clear need for a well-designed comparative trial.