The impact of delayed source control and antimicrobial therapy in 196 patients with cholecystitis-associated septic shock: a cohort analysis

2024 Clinical Practice Guideline Update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America on Complicated Intra-abdominal Infections: Risk Assessment in Adults and Children

This paper is part of a clinical practice guideline update on the risk assessment, diagnostic imaging, and microbiological evaluation of complicated intra-abdominal infections in adults, children, and pregnant people, developed by the Infectious Diseases Society of America. In this paper, the panel provides a recommendation for risk stratification according to severity of illness score. The panel's recommendation is based on evidence derived from systematic literature reviews and adheres to a standardized methodology for rating the certainty of evidence and strength of recommendation according to the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) approach.

Importance of timely and adequate source control in sepsis and septic shock

Source control is defined as the physical measures undertaken to eliminate the source of infection and control ongoing contamination, as well as restore anatomy and function at the site of infection. It is a key component of the management of patients with sepsis and septic shock and one of the main determinants of the outcome of infections that require source control. While not all infections may require source control, it should be considered in every patient presenting with sepsis; it is applicable and necessary in numerous infections, not only those occurring in the abdominal cavity. Although the biological rationale is clear, several aspects of source control remain under debate. The timing of source control may impact outcome; early source control is particularly relevant for patients with abdominal infections or necrotizing skin and soft tissue infections, as well as for those with more severe disease. Percutaneous procedures are increasingly used for source control; nevertheless, surgery-tailored to the patient and infection-remains a valid option for source control. For outcome optimization, adequate source control is more important than the strategy used. It should be acknowledged that source control interventions may often fail, posing a challenge in this setting. Thus, an individualized, multidisciplinary approach tailored to the infection and patient is preferable.

Major Publications in the Critical Care Pharmacotherapy Literature: 2021

To summarize the most impactful articles relevant to the pharmacotherapy of critically ill adult patients published in 2021.

DATA SOURCE

PubMed/MEDLINE.

STUDY SELECTION

Randomized controlled trials, prospective studies, or systematic review/meta-analyses of adult critical care patients assessing a pharmacotherapeutic intervention and reporting clinical endpoints published between January 1, 2021, and December 31, 2021.

DATA EXTRACTION

Candidate articles were organized by clinical domain based on the emerging themes from all studies. A modified Delphi process was applied to obtain consensus on the most impactful publication within each clinical domain based on overall contribution to scientific knowledge and novelty to the literature.

DATA SYNTHESIS

The search revealed 830 articles, of which 766 were excluded leaving 64 candidate articles for the Delphi process. These 64 articles were organized by clinical domain including: emergency/neurology, cardiopulmonary, nephrology/fluids, infectious diseases, metabolic, immunomodulation, and nutrition/gastroenterology. Each domain required the a priori defined three Delphi rounds. The resultant most impactful articles from each domain included five randomized controlled trials and two systematic review/meta-analyses. Topics studied included sedation during mechanical ventilation, anticoagulation in COVID-19, extended infusion beta-lactams, interleukin-6 antagonists in COVID-19, balanced crystalloid resuscitation, vitamin C/thiamine/hydrocortisone in sepsis, and promotility agents during enteral feeding.

CONCLUSIONS

This synoptic review provides a summary and perspective of the most impactful articles relevant to the pharmacotherapy of critically ill adults published in 2021.

Leukocyte kinetics during the early stage acts as a prognostic marker in patients with septic shock in intensive care unit

The leukocytes play an important role in immune function during sepsis. We performed a retrospective study to investigate if leukocytes kinetics was associated with survival in critically ill patients with septic shock in intensive care unit (ICU).Patients with septic shock from January 1, 2014 to June 30, 2018 in our ICU were included. We extracted the demographic, clinical and laboratory data, comorbidities from our clinical database. The number of white blood cell, neutrophil and lymphocyte on day 1 and day 3 after diagnosis were collected and neutrophil to lymphocyte ratios (NLR) were calculated. Our primary outcome was 28-day mortality. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression models and cox proportional risk model were used to analyze the association between the leukocytes kinetics during first 3 days after ICU admission and the day-28 mortality.A total of 1245 septic shock patients with a 28-day mortality of 35.02% were included into analysis. There were no significant difference of lymphocyte number (0.83 ± 0.02 vs 0.80 ± 0.04, P = .552) between survival and non-survivals on day 1. However, the lymphocyte counts was significantly lower (0.95 ± 0.03 vs 0.85 ± 0.04, P = .024) on the third day. Both multivariate logistic and Cox regression analysis showed that lymphocyte counts on day 3 were associated with day-28 mortality. Moreover, Kaplan-Meier survival analysis revealed that increasing in lymphocyte counts and decreasing WBC, neutrophils and NLR during the first 3 days after diagnosis were associated with longer survival.Leukocytes kinetics during the first 3 days is a valuable prognostic marker in patients with septic shock in the ICU.

Impact of time to antibiotic therapy on clinical outcome in patients with bacterial infections in the emergency department: implications for antimicrobial stewardship

BACKGROUND

Rapid initiation of antibiotic treatment is considered crucial in patients with severe infections such as septic shock and bacterial meningitis, but may not be as important for other infectious syndromes. A better understanding of which patients can tolerate a delay in start of therapy is important for antibiotic stewardship purposes.

OBJECTIVES

To explore the existing evidence on the impact of time to antibiotics on clinical outcomes in patients presenting to the emergency department (ED) with bacterial infections of different severity of illness and source of infection.

SOURCES

A literature search was performed in the PubMed/MEDLINE database using combined search terms for various infectious syndromes (sepsis/septic shock, bacterial meningitis, lower respiratory tract infections, urinary tract infections, intra-abdominal infections and skin and soft tissue infections), time to antibiotic treatment, and clinical outcome.

CONTENT

The literature search generated 8828 hits. After screening titles and abstracts and assessing potentially relevant full-text papers, 60 original articles (four randomized controlled trials, 43 observational studies) were included. Most articles addressed sepsis/septic shock, while few studies evaluated early initiation of therapy in mild to moderate disease. The lack of randomized trials and the risk of confounding factors and biases in observational studies warrant caution in the interpretation of results. We conclude that the literature supports prompt administration of effective antibiotics for septic shock and bacterial meningitis, but there is no clear evidence showing that a delayed start of therapy is associated with worse outcome for less severe infectious syndromes.

IMPLICATIONS

For patients presenting with suspected bacterial infections, withholding antibiotic therapy until diagnostic results are available and a diagnosis has been established (e.g. by 4-8 h) seems acceptable in most cases unless septic shock or bacterial meningitis are suspected. This approach promotes the use of ecologically favourable antibiotics in the ED, reducing the risks of side effects and selection of resistance.

Basic point-of-care ultrasound framework based on the airway, breathing, and circulation approach for the initial management of shock and dyspnea

Ultrasound (US) carried out and interpreted by clinicians at the bedside is now called point‐of‐care US (POCUS). Clinical studies on POCUS have been carried out based on the ideas of “creation”, “extraction”, and “combination”. “Creation” refers to findings for the upper airway and lung being obtained at the bedside. “Extraction” refers to findings suitable for POCUS being extracted from comprehensive US, including echocardiography, abdominal US, and whole‐leg US. “Combination” refers to these POCUS applications being combined for the comprehensive assessment of patients with trauma, shock, or dyspnea. Emergency and critical care physicians have many opportunities to encounter trauma or non‐trauma patients with shock, dyspnea, or both. Furthermore, the scope of POCUS includes many diseases and injuries that present with both shock and dyspnea. Therefore, we propose a basic POCUS framework based on the systematic airway, breathing, and circulation approach for the initial management of shock and dyspnea in adult patients. In this article, we update and review each application of POCUS and their combination in this framework. Furthermore, we propose the practical usage of the framework based on clinical presentations to improve the management of shock and dyspnea.