1
|
El-Dahiyat F, Jairoun AA, Al-Hemyari SS, Shahwan M, Hassan N, Jairoun S, Jaber AAS. Are pharmacists' knowledge and practice the key to promoting deprescribing of potentially inappropriate medication: a missing link between treatment and outcomes. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PHARMACY PRACTICE 2023:7146786. [PMID: 37116892 DOI: 10.1093/ijpp/riad027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/29/2022] [Accepted: 04/13/2023] [Indexed: 04/30/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Deprescribing is a novel strategy whereby medical professionals aim to optimize a patient's prescription program by removing redundant medications. Few studies have looked at the viewpoints of community pharmacists and other healthcare professionals on deprescribing in daily practice. This study's objectives included evaluating community pharmacists' deprescribing knowledge, attitudes and practices, as well as identifying the obstacles to and enablers of deprescribing in daily practice. METHODS Five pharmacy students in the last year of their studies polled employees of neighbourhood pharmacies in Abu Dhabi, Dubai, and the Northern Emirates from April 2022 to July 2022. The study's questionnaire was divided into two sections: questions that inquired about the respondents' demographic data and questions that evaluated the respondents' understanding and usage of the deprescribing of potentially harmful medications for patients. The original Bloom's cutoff points were revised and modified to assess the general knowledge and deprescribing practices of United Arab Emirates (UAE) community pharmacists. Multivariate logistic regression identified the variables influencing respondents' deprescribing knowledge and practice. KEY FINDINGS The average age of the participants was 30.8 ± 6.4 SD. Of the total, 255 (37.7%) were male and 422 (62.3%) were female. Pharmacists from independent pharmacies constituted 52.9% of the study sample and 47.1% were from Chain pharmacies. Among the participants, 58.8% (n = 398) had 1-5 years of experience and 41.2% (n = 279) had more than 5 years. Nearly three-quarters of the pharmacists (72.1%, 488) graduated from local universities and 27.9% (n = 189) graduated from regional/international universities. The vast majority of the study sample (84.8%, 574) were bachelor's degree holders and 88.3% (n = 598) were pharmacists in charge. Of the total, 69.3% (n = 469) received deprescribing training to treat patients with multimorbid diseases. The knowledge and practice score was 71.3% with a 95% confidence interval [70.2%, 72.4%]. Of the total participants, 113 (16.7%) had poor knowledge and practice about deprescribing, 393 (58.1%) had moderate knowledge and practice and 171 (25.3%) had good knowledge and practice. CONCLUSION This study highlights the level of understanding of community pharmacists about deprescribing in the UAE. Although most of the respondents in this study received training on deprescribing, less than half of the community pharmacists were unaware of certain classes (long-acting sulfonylureas, anti-diabetic, antihyperlipidemic and psychotropic drugs) of drugs that are candidates for potential deprescribing. This finding indicates that their knowledge about deprescribing was insufficient. Several barriers community pharmacists face in deprescribing were also identified, with patients' resistance and insufficience being the most prevalent. Therefore, there is a need for improved deprescribing practices to ensure drug safety.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Faris El-Dahiyat
- Clinical Pharmacy Program, College of Pharmacy, Al Ain University, Al Ain, UAE
- AAU Health and Biomedical Research Center, Al Ain University, Abu Dhabi, UAE
| | - Ammar Abdulrahman Jairoun
- School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Pulau Pinang, Gelugor, Malaysia
- Health and Safety Department, Dubai Municipality, Dubai, UAE
| | - Sabaa Saleh Al-Hemyari
- School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Pulau Pinang, Gelugor, Malaysia
- Pharmacy Department, Emirates Health Services, Dubai, UAE
| | - Moyad Shahwan
- College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, Ajman University, Ajman, UAE
- Centre of Medical and Bio-Allied Health Sciences Research, Ajman University, Ajman, UAE
| | - Nageeb Hassan
- College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, Ajman University, Ajman, UAE
- Centre of Medical and Bio-Allied Health Sciences Research, Ajman University, Ajman, UAE
| | - Sumaya Jairoun
- Pharmacy Department, Valiant Hospital, Dubai, UAE
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy & Pharmacotherapeutics, Dubai Pharmacy College for Girls, Al mizhar Dubai, UAE
| | - Ammar Ali Saleh Jaber
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy & Pharmacotherapeutics, Dubai Pharmacy College for Girls, Al mizhar Dubai, UAE
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Farrell B, Raman-Wilms L, Sadowski CA, Mallery L, Turner J, Gagnon C, Cole M, Grill A, Isenor JE, Mangin D, McCarthy LM, Schuster B, Sirois C, Sun W, Upshur R. A Proposed Curricular Framework for an Interprofessional Approach to Deprescribing. MEDICAL SCIENCE EDUCATOR 2023; 33:551-567. [PMID: 37261023 PMCID: PMC10226933 DOI: 10.1007/s40670-022-01704-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/28/2022] [Indexed: 06/02/2023]
Abstract
Deprescribing involves reducing or stopping medications that are causing more harm than good or are no longer needed. It is an important approach to managing polypharmacy, yet healthcare professionals identify many barriers. We present a proposed pre-licensure competency framework that describes essential knowledge, teaching strategies, and assessment protocols to promote interprofessional deprescribing skills. The framework considers how to involve patients and care partners in deprescribing decisions. An action plan and example curriculum mapping exercise are included to help educators assess their curricula, and select and implement these concepts and strategies within their programs to ensure learners graduate with competencies to manage increasingly complex medication regimens as people age. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40670-022-01704-9.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Barbara Farrell
- Bruyère Research Institute, 43 Bruyère St, Ottawa, ON K1N 5C8 Canada
- Department of Family Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON Canada
- School of Pharmacy, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON Canada
| | - Lalitha Raman-Wilms
- College of Pharmacy, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB Canada
- Centre On Aging, Winnipeg, MB Canada
| | - Cheryl A. Sadowski
- Faculty of Pharmacy & Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB Canada
| | - Laurie Mallery
- Faculty of Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS Canada
| | - Justin Turner
- Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Montreal, Montreal, QC Canada
- Centre de Recherche, Institut Universitaire de Gériatrie de Montréal, Montréal, QC Canada
- Faculty of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Monash University, Victoria, Australia
| | - Camille Gagnon
- Canadian Deprescribing Network, Centre de Recherche, Institut Universitaire de Gériatrie de Montréal, Montréal, QC Canada
| | - Mollie Cole
- Canadian Gerontological Nursing Association, Calgary, AB Canada
| | - Allan Grill
- Dept. of Family & Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON Canada
- Markham Family Health Team, Markham, ON Canada
- Ontario Renal Network, Toronto, Canada
| | - Jennifer E. Isenor
- College of Pharmacy, Faculty of Health and Department of Community Health and Epidemiology, Faculty of Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS Canada
| | - Dee Mangin
- David Braley & Nancy Gordon Chair in Family Medicine, Department of Family Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON Canada
- Department of General Practice, University of Otago, Christchurch, New Zealand
| | - Lisa M. McCarthy
- Bruyère Research Institute, 43 Bruyère St, Ottawa, ON K1N 5C8 Canada
- School of Pharmacy, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON Canada
- Institute for Better Health and Pharmacy Department, Trillium Health Partners, Mississauga, ON Canada
- Leslie Dan Faculty of Pharmacy & Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON Canada
- Women’s College Research Institute, Toronto, ON Canada
| | - Brenda Schuster
- College of Medicine (Regina Campus), University of Saskatchewan, Regina, Saskachewan Canada
| | - Caroline Sirois
- Centre d’excellence Sur Le Vieillissement de Québec & VITAM - Research Centre On Sustainable Health, Québec, Canada
- Faculty of Pharmacy, Université Laval, Québec, Canada
| | - Winnie Sun
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Ontario Tech University, Oshawa, ON Canada
- Ontario Shores Centre for Mental Health Sciences, Whitby, ON Canada
| | - Ross Upshur
- Division of Clinical Public Health, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON Canada
- Bridgepoint Collaboratory for Research and Innovation, Toronto, ON Canada
- Lunenfeld Tanenbaum Research Institute, Sinai Health, Toronto, ON Canada
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON Canada
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Gillespie R, Mullan J, Harrison L. Exploring Older Adult Health Literacy in the Day-to-Day Management of Polypharmacy and Making Decisions About Deprescribing: A Mixed Methods Study. Health Lit Res Pract 2023; 7:e14-e25. [PMID: 36629783 PMCID: PMC9833258 DOI: 10.3928/24748307-20221216-01] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/12/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Polypharmacy use in older adults is increasing and sometimes leads to poor health outcomes. The influence of health literacy in managing polypharmacy and making decisions about stopping medication has received limited attention. OBJECTIVE A mixed methods design was used to measure and investigate the influence of health literacy in the management of polypharmacy and decisions about deprescribing. Phase 1 involved two cross-sectional surveys, one with older adults using five or more medications and the other with general practitioners (GPs). METHODS Older adult health literacy was measured using the All Aspects of Health Literacy Scale. Phase 2 employed individual interviews with both older adults and GPs and further explored the reported use of health literacy in practice. SPSS version 24 was used to conduct descriptive statistical analysis of the Phase 1 survey responses and Phase 2 interviews were analyzed using thematic analysis with the assistance of NVivo 12. KEY RESULTS Phase 1 survey responses were received from 85 GPs and 137 older adults. Phase 2 interviews were conducted with 16 GPs and 25 older adults. Phase 1 results indicated that self-reported older adult health literacy was high, and that GPs believed older patients could engage in decisions about deprescribing. Phase 2 findings showed that older adults developed and employed complex health literacy practices to manage medications between consultations; however, few reported using their health literacy skills in consultations with their GPs. GPs noted that older adult involvement in decision-making varied and generally thought that older adults had low health literacy. CONCLUSION Older adults reported using health literacy practices in the management of their sometimes-complex medication regimens. However, the role of health literacy in deprescribing decision-making was limited. The mixed methods approach allowed greater insight into older adult and GP practices that influence the acquisition and use of health literacy. [HLRP: Health Literacy Research and Practice. 2023;7(1):e14-e25.] Plain Language Summary: This report explores health literacy in the use of multiple medications and decisions to stop using medication/s in older age. Older adults reported good heath literacy and practiced many health literacy skills in the management of their medications. However, they did not always report the use of their health literacy skills when discussing their medications with their family doctor.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robyn Gillespie
- Address correspondence to Robyn Gillespie, PhD, MPH, BN, via
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Identification of Potentially Inappropriate Medications in Frail Older Adults Residing in Long-Term Care: A Retrospective Chart Review Study. Drugs Real World Outcomes 2022; 10:97-106. [PMID: 36436174 PMCID: PMC9943820 DOI: 10.1007/s40801-022-00342-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/30/2022] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Deprescribing is associated with positive health outcomes for older adults in long-term care (LTC), however deprescribing is not universally implemented. OBJECTIVE The primary aim of this study was to estimate the prevalence of potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) prescribed to frail older adults in Irish long-term care facilities (LTCFs), as identified by the Screening Tool of Older Persons Prescriptions in Frail adults with limited life expectancy, version 2 (STOPPFrail v2). METHODS A retrospective chart review was conducted in two publicly funded LTCFs in Ireland. Eligible participants were those (1) ≥ 65 years of age; (2) resident in a LTCF; (3) eligible as per the STOPPFrail v2 criteria by the site's Medical Officer; and (4) receiving regular medication. Data collected included age, sex, drug, dose, frequency, regular/pro re nata prescribing and indication/relevant diagnoses. Rates of polypharmacy (taking five or more medications) and excessive polypharmacy (taking 10 or more medications) were calculated. STOPPFrail v2 was used to identify PIMs; however, clinical measurements were not taken. Descriptive and association statistics were calculated. RESULTS Of the 103 residents, 89 were ≥ 65 years of age and categorised as frail and were therefore eligible for inclusion in the study. Of those eligible, 85 (95.5%) had polypharmacy and 57 (64%) experienced excessive polypharmacy. The mean number of regular medications was 10.8 (± 3.8), total medications 17.7 (± 5) and diagnoses 5.5 (± 2.5). The mean number of PIMs per resident was 4.8 (± 2.6). Of the eligible participants, 59.6% had at least one medicine without a documented indication, while 61.8%, 42.7% and 30.3% had at least one PIM from the vitamin D, antihypertensives and proton pump inhibitors drug classes, respectively. CONCLUSION Medication and PIM use was high among LTC residents, with inappropriate polypharmacy of concern. Lack of clear indication for prescribing medications appears to be an issue in LTC, potentially affecting healthcare professionals' engagement with deprescribing. The prevalence of PIMs may be overestimated in the antihypertensives/antidiabetic classes due to the lack of clinical measurements.
Collapse
|
5
|
Turk A, Wong G, Mahtani KR, Maden M, Hill R, Ranson E, Wallace E, Krska J, Mangin D, Byng R, Lasserson D, Reeve J. Optimising a person-centred approach to stopping medicines in older people with multimorbidity and polypharmacy using the DExTruS framework: a realist review. BMC Med 2022; 20:297. [PMID: 36042454 PMCID: PMC9429627 DOI: 10.1186/s12916-022-02475-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/15/2022] [Accepted: 07/12/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Tackling problematic polypharmacy requires tailoring the use of medicines to individual circumstances and may involve the process of deprescribing. Deprescribing can cause anxiety and concern for clinicians and patients. Tailoring medication decisions often entails beyond protocol decision-making, a complex process involving emotional and cognitive work for healthcare professionals and patients. We undertook realist review to highlight and understand the interactions between different factors involved in deprescribing and to develop a final programme theory that identifies and explains components of good practice that support a person-centred approach to deprescribing in older patients with multimorbidity and polypharmacy. METHODS The realist approach involves identifying underlying causal mechanisms and exploring how, and under what conditions they work. We conducted a search of electronic databases which were supplemented by citation checking and consultation with stakeholders to identify other key documents. The review followed the key steps outlined by Pawson et al. and followed the RAMESES standards for realist syntheses. RESULTS We included 119 included documents from which data were extracted to produce context-mechanism-outcome configurations (CMOCs) and a final programme theory. Our programme theory recognises that deprescribing is a complex intervention influenced by a multitude of factors. The components of our final programme theory include the following: a supportive infrastructure that provides clear guidance around professional responsibilities and that enables multidisciplinary working and continuity of care, consistent access to high-quality relevant patient contextual data, the need to support the creation of a shared explanation and understanding of the meaning and purpose of medicines and a trial and learn approach that provides space for monitoring and continuity. These components may support the development of trust which may be key to managing the uncertainty and in turn optimise outcomes. These components are summarised in the novel DExTruS framework. CONCLUSION Our findings recognise the complex interpretive practice and decision-making involved in medication management and identify key components needed to support best practice. Our findings have implications for how we design medication review consultations, professional training and for patient records/data management. Our review also highlights the role that trust plays both as a central element of tailored prescribing and a potential outcome of good practice in this area.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amadea Turk
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, Radcliffe Observatory Quarter, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX2 6GG, UK
| | - Geoffrey Wong
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, Radcliffe Observatory Quarter, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX2 6GG, UK
| | - Kamal R Mahtani
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, Radcliffe Observatory Quarter, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX2 6GG, UK
| | - Michelle Maden
- Liverpool Reviews & Implementation Group, Institute of Population Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, L69 3BX, UK
| | - Ruaraidh Hill
- Liverpool Reviews & Implementation Group, Institute of Population Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, L69 3BX, UK
| | - Ed Ranson
- Academy of Primary Care, Hull York Medical School, Allam Medical Building, University of Hull, Hull, HU6 7RX, UK
| | - Emma Wallace
- Department of General Practice RCSI University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dublin 2, Ireland
| | - Janet Krska
- Medway School of Pharmacy, Universities of Greenwich and Kent, Chatham Maritime, Kent, ME4 4TB, UK
| | - Dee Mangin
- Department of Family Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, L8P 1H6, Canada
| | - Richard Byng
- Community and Primary Care Research Group, Peninsula Medical School, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, PL4 8AA, UK
| | - Daniel Lasserson
- Health Sciences, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, CV4 7AL, UK
| | - Joanne Reeve
- Academy of Primary Care, Hull York Medical School, Allam Medical Building, University of Hull, Hull, HU6 7RX, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Reeve J, Maden M, Hill R, Turk A, Mahtani K, Wong G, Lasserson D, Krska J, Mangin D, Byng R, Wallace E, Ranson E. Deprescribing medicines in older people living with multimorbidity and polypharmacy: the TAILOR evidence synthesis. Health Technol Assess 2022; 26:1-148. [PMID: 35894932 DOI: 10.3310/aafo2475] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Tackling problematic polypharmacy requires tailoring the use of medicines to individual needs and circumstances. This may involve stopping medicines (deprescribing) but patients and clinicians report uncertainty on how best to do this. The TAILOR medication synthesis sought to help understand how best to support deprescribing in older people living with multimorbidity and polypharmacy. OBJECTIVES We identified two research questions: (1) what evidence exists to support the safe, effective and acceptable stopping of medication in this patient group, and (2) how, for whom and in what contexts can safe and effective tailoring of clinical decisions related to medication use work to produce desired outcomes? We thus described three objectives: (1) to undertake a robust scoping review of the literature on stopping medicines in this group to describe what is being done, where and for what effect; (2) to undertake a realist synthesis review to construct a programme theory that describes 'best practice' and helps explain the heterogeneity of deprescribing approaches; and (3) to translate findings into resources to support tailored prescribing in clinical practice. DATA SOURCES Experienced information specialists conducted comprehensive searches in MEDLINE, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Web of Science, EMBASE, The Cochrane Library (Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials), Joanna Briggs Institute Database of Systematic Reviews and Implementation Reports, Google (Google Inc., Mountain View, CA, USA) and Google Scholar (targeted searches). REVIEW METHODS The scoping review followed the five steps described by the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology for conducting a scoping review. The realist review followed the methodological and publication standards for realist reviews described by the Realist And Meta-narrative Evidence Syntheses: Evolving Standards (RAMESES) group. Patient and public involvement partners ensured that our analysis retained a patient-centred focus. RESULTS Our scoping review identified 9528 abstracts: 8847 were removed at screening and 662 were removed at full-text review. This left 20 studies (published between 2009 and 2020) that examined the effectiveness, safety and acceptability of deprescribing in adults (aged ≥ 50 years) with polypharmacy (five or more prescribed medications) and multimorbidity (two or more conditions). Our analysis revealed that deprescribing under research conditions mapped well to expert guidance on the steps needed for good clinical practice. Our findings offer evidence-informed support to clinicians regarding the safety, clinician acceptability and potential effectiveness of clinical decision-making that demonstrates a structured approach to deprescribing decisions. Our realist review identified 2602 studies with 119 included in the final analysis. The analysis outlined 34 context-mechanism-outcome configurations describing the knowledge work of tailored prescribing under eight headings related to organisational, health-care professional and patient factors, and interventions to improve deprescribing. We conclude that robust tailored deprescribing requires attention to providing an enabling infrastructure, access to data, tailored explanations and trust. LIMITATIONS Strict application of our definition of multimorbidity during the scoping review may have had an impact on the relevance of the review to clinical practice. The realist review was limited by the data (evidence) available. CONCLUSIONS Our combined reviews recognise deprescribing as a complex intervention and provide support for the safety of structured approaches to deprescribing, but also highlight the need to integrate patient-centred and contextual factors into best practice models. FUTURE WORK The TAILOR study has informed new funded research tackling deprescribing in sleep management, and professional education. Further research is being developed to implement tailored prescribing into routine primary care practice. STUDY REGISTRATION This study is registered as PROSPERO CRD42018107544 and PROSPERO CRD42018104176. FUNDING This project was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme and will be published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 26, No. 32. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joanne Reeve
- Academy of Primary Care, Hull York Medical School, University of Hull, Hull, UK
| | - Michelle Maden
- Liverpool Reviews and Implementation Group, Institute of Population Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Ruaraidh Hill
- Liverpool Reviews and Implementation Group, Institute of Population Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Amadea Turk
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Kamal Mahtani
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Geoff Wong
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Dan Lasserson
- Health Sciences, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
| | - Janet Krska
- Medway School of Pharmacy, Universities of Greenwich and Kent, Chatham, UK
| | - Dee Mangin
- Department of Family Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Richard Byng
- Community and Primary Care Research Group, Peninsula Medical School, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, UK
| | - Emma Wallace
- Department of General Practice, RCSI University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dublin, Ireland
| | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Andersen AL, Houlind MB, Nielsen RL, Jørgensen LM, Treldal C, Damgaard M, Bengaard AK, Juul-Larsen HG, Laursen LB, Iversen E, Kruse M, Pedersen AML, Hornum M, Beck AM, Pedersen MM, Ankarfeldt MZ, Petersen J, Andersen O. Optimization of Nutrition And Medication (OptiNAM) for acutely admitted older patients: protocol for a randomized single-blinded controlled trial. Trials 2021; 22:616. [PMID: 34521465 PMCID: PMC8439057 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-021-05456-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/30/2020] [Accepted: 07/13/2021] [Indexed: 01/01/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Internationally, older patients (≥65 years) account for more than 40% of acute admissions. Older patients admitted to the emergency department (ED) are frequently malnourished and exposed to inappropriate medication prescribing, due in part to the inaccuracy of creatinine-based equations for estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). The overall aims of this trial are to investigate: (1) the efficacy of a medication review (MED intervention) independent of nutritional status, (2) the accuracy of eGFR equations based on various biomarkers compared to measured GFR (mGFR) based on 99mTechnetium-diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid plasma clearance, and (3) the efficacy of an individualized multimodal and transitional nutritional intervention (MULTI-NUT-MED intervention) in older patients with or at risk of malnutrition in the ED. METHODS The trial is a single-center block randomized, controlled, observer-blinded, superiority and explorative trial with two parallel groups. The population consists of 200 older patients admitted to the ED: 70 patients without malnutrition or risk of malnutrition and 130 patients with or at risk of malnutrition defined as a Mini Nutritional Assessment-Short Form score ≤11. All patients without the risk of malnutrition receive the MED intervention, which consists of a medication review by a pharmacist and geriatrician in the ED. Patients with or at risk of malnutrition receive the MULTI-NUT-MED intervention, which consists of the MED intervention in addition to, dietary counseling and individualized interventions based on the results of screening tests for dysphagia, problems with activities of daily living, low muscle strength in the lower extremities, depression, and problems with oral health. Baseline data are collected upon study inclusion, and follow-up data are collected at 8 and 16 weeks after discharge. The primary outcomes are (1) change in medication appropriateness index (MAI) score from baseline to 8 weeks after discharge, (2) accuracy of different eGFR equations compared to mGFR, and (3) change in health-related quality of life (measured with EuroQol-5D-5L) from baseline to 16 weeks after discharge. DISCUSSION The trial will provide new information on strategies to optimize the treatment of malnutrition and inappropriate medication prescribing among older patients admitted to the ED. TRAIL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov NTC03741283 . Retrospectively registered on 14 November 2018.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aino L Andersen
- Department of Clinical Research, Copenhagen University Hospital Amager and Hvidovre, Kettegaards alle 30, 2650, Hvidovre, Denmark.,Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Blegdamsvej 3B, 2200, Copenhagen N, Denmark
| | - Morten B Houlind
- Department of Clinical Research, Copenhagen University Hospital Amager and Hvidovre, Kettegaards alle 30, 2650, Hvidovre, Denmark.,The Capital Region Pharmacy, Marielundsvej 25, 2730, Herlev, Denmark.,Department of Drug Design and Pharmacology, University of Copenhagen, Universitetsparken 2, 2100, Copenhagen Ø, Denmark
| | - Rikke L Nielsen
- Department of Clinical Research, Copenhagen University Hospital Amager and Hvidovre, Kettegaards alle 30, 2650, Hvidovre, Denmark.,Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Blegdamsvej 3B, 2200, Copenhagen N, Denmark
| | - Lillian M Jørgensen
- Department of Clinical Research, Copenhagen University Hospital Amager and Hvidovre, Kettegaards alle 30, 2650, Hvidovre, Denmark.,Emergency Department, Copenhagen University Hospital Amager and Hvidovre, Kettegaards alle 30, 2650, Hvidovre, Denmark
| | - Charlotte Treldal
- Department of Clinical Research, Copenhagen University Hospital Amager and Hvidovre, Kettegaards alle 30, 2650, Hvidovre, Denmark.,The Capital Region Pharmacy, Marielundsvej 25, 2730, Herlev, Denmark.,Department of Drug Design and Pharmacology, University of Copenhagen, Universitetsparken 2, 2100, Copenhagen Ø, Denmark
| | - Morten Damgaard
- Department of Clinical Physiology and Nuclear Medicine, Centre for Functional and Diagnostic Imaging and Research, Copenhagen University Hospital Amager and Hvidovre, Kettegaards alle 30, 2650, Hvidovre, Denmark
| | - Anne Kathrine Bengaard
- Department of Clinical Research, Copenhagen University Hospital Amager and Hvidovre, Kettegaards alle 30, 2650, Hvidovre, Denmark.,Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Blegdamsvej 3B, 2200, Copenhagen N, Denmark.,The Capital Region Pharmacy, Marielundsvej 25, 2730, Herlev, Denmark
| | - Helle Gybel Juul-Larsen
- Department of Clinical Research, Copenhagen University Hospital Amager and Hvidovre, Kettegaards alle 30, 2650, Hvidovre, Denmark
| | - Louise Bolvig Laursen
- Department of Physio- and Occupational Therapy, Copenhagen University Hospital Amager and Hvidovre, Kettegaards alle 30, 2650, Hvidovre, Denmark
| | - Esben Iversen
- Department of Clinical Research, Copenhagen University Hospital Amager and Hvidovre, Kettegaards alle 30, 2650, Hvidovre, Denmark
| | - Marie Kruse
- Department of Clinical Research, Copenhagen University Hospital Amager and Hvidovre, Kettegaards alle 30, 2650, Hvidovre, Denmark.,Danish Centre for Health Economics, University of Southern Denmark, J.B. Winsløws Vej 9B, 5000, Odense C, Denmark
| | - Anne M L Pedersen
- Section of Oral Medicine and Pathology, Department of Odontology, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen N, Denmark
| | - Mads Hornum
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Blegdamsvej 3B, 2200, Copenhagen N, Denmark.,Department of Nephrology, Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet, Inge Lehmanns Vej 7, Copenhagen Ø, Denmark
| | - Anne M Beck
- Department of Nursing and Nutrition, University College Copenhagen, Sigurdsgade 26, 2200, Copenhagen N, Denmark.,Dietetic and Nutritional Research Unit, Herlev-Gentofte University Hospital, Borgmester Ib Juuls Vej 50, 2730, Herlev, Denmark
| | - Mette M Pedersen
- Department of Clinical Research, Copenhagen University Hospital Amager and Hvidovre, Kettegaards alle 30, 2650, Hvidovre, Denmark.,Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Blegdamsvej 3B, 2200, Copenhagen N, Denmark
| | - Mikkel Z Ankarfeldt
- Department of Clinical Research, Copenhagen University Hospital Amager and Hvidovre, Kettegaards alle 30, 2650, Hvidovre, Denmark.,Copenhagen Phase IV unit (Phase4CPH), Center of Clinical Research and Prevention and Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Copenhagen University Hospital Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg, Nordre Fasanvej 57, 2000, Frederiksberg, Denmark
| | - Janne Petersen
- Department of Clinical Research, Copenhagen University Hospital Amager and Hvidovre, Kettegaards alle 30, 2650, Hvidovre, Denmark.,Copenhagen Phase IV unit (Phase4CPH), Center of Clinical Research and Prevention and Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Copenhagen University Hospital Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg, Nordre Fasanvej 57, 2000, Frederiksberg, Denmark.,Section of Biostatistics, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Øster Farimagsgade 5, 1014, Copenhagen K, Denmark
| | - Ove Andersen
- Department of Clinical Research, Copenhagen University Hospital Amager and Hvidovre, Kettegaards alle 30, 2650, Hvidovre, Denmark. .,Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Blegdamsvej 3B, 2200, Copenhagen N, Denmark. .,Emergency Department, Copenhagen University Hospital Amager and Hvidovre, Kettegaards alle 30, 2650, Hvidovre, Denmark.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Bell K, Hartmann C, Baughman AW. A pharmacist-led pilot using a performance dashboard to improve psychotropic medication use in a skilled nursing facility. BMJ Open Qual 2021; 9:bmjoq-2020-000997. [PMID: 32816865 PMCID: PMC7430330 DOI: 10.1136/bmjoq-2020-000997] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/15/2020] [Revised: 06/01/2020] [Accepted: 07/21/2020] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Objectives Inappropriate use of psychotropic medications in the elderly, particularly those with dementia, is a critical safety and quality concern. This pilot quality improvement study used a novel Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Psychotropic Drug Safety Initiative performance dashboard (PDSI dashboard) to implement a pharmacist-led intervention to improve psychotropic medication prescribing practices in a VA skilled nursing facility (SNF). While clinical dashboard data have become commonplace, literature describing successful implementation for improved clinical care is scant. Methods This study took place from November 2015 to February 2016 at a 112-bed VA SNF. A pharmacist used the PDSI dashboard to identify ‘actionable’ patients with potentially inappropriate psychotropic prescribing and then completed chart reviews to confirm clinical indications. The pharmacist provided recommendations to providers for dose reductions or deprescribing via in-person communication and notes written in the electronic medical record. SNF providers completed anonymous surveys about their experience in receiving recommendations. Results Over a 5-month period, the PDSI dashboard identified 21 patients with potentially inappropriate psychotropic medication use, with approximately one new patient identified each week. Prescribing recommendations were accepted 66% of the time. All seven SNF providers reported that recommendations were helpful in improving their psychotropic prescribing practices. Conclusions The PDSI dashboard was efficient and effective in identifying patients at risk for inappropriate use of psychotropic medications. A clinical pharmacist was essential for implementing and communicating recommendations from the dashboard to providers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kristin Bell
- Pharmacy, Veterans Affairs Boston Healthcare System, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Christine Hartmann
- Edith Nourse Rogers Memorial Veterans Hospital, Bedford, Massachusetts, USA.,Public Health, University of Massachusetts Lowell, Lowell, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Amy Wisteria Baughman
- Geriatrics and Extended Care, Veterans Affairs Boston Healthcare System, Boston, MA, United States .,Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Aharaz A, Rasmussen JH, McNulty HBØ, Cyron A, Fabricius PK, Bengaard AK, Sejberg HRC, Simonsen RRL, Treldal C, Houlind MB. A Collaborative Deprescribing Intervention in a Subacute Medical Outpatient Clinic: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial. Metabolites 2021; 11:204. [PMID: 33808080 PMCID: PMC8066016 DOI: 10.3390/metabo11040204] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2020] [Revised: 03/11/2021] [Accepted: 03/25/2021] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
Medication deprescribing is essential to prevent inappropriate medication use in multimorbid patients. However, experience of deprescribing in Danish Subacute Medical Outpatient Clinics (SMOCs) is limited. The objective of our pilot study was to evaluate the feasibility and sustainability of a collaborative deprescribing intervention by a pharmacist and a physician to multimorbid patients in a SMOC. A randomized controlled pilot study was conducted, with phone follow-up at 30 and 365+ days. A senior pharmacist performed a systematic deprescribing intervention using the Screening Tool of Older Persons' potentially inappropriate Prescriptions (STOPP) criteria, the Danish deprescribing list, and patient interviews. A senior physician received the proposed recommendations and decided which should be implemented. The main outcome was the number of patients having ≥1 medication where deprescribing status was sustained 30 days after inclusion. Out of 76 eligible patients, 72 (95%) were included and 67 (93%) completed the study (57% male; mean age 73 years; mean number of 10 prescribed medications). Nineteen patients (56%) in the intervention group and four (12%) in the control group had ≥1 medication where deprescribing status was sustained 30 days after inclusion (p = 0.015). In total, 37 medications were deprescribed in the intervention group and five in the control group. At 365+ days after inclusion, 97% and 100% of the deprescribed medications were sustained in the intervention and control groups, respectively. The three most frequently deprescribed medication groups were analgesics, cardiovascular, and gastrointestinal medications. In conclusion, a collaborative deprescribing intervention for multimorbid patients was feasible and resulted in sustainable deprescribing of medication in a SMOC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anissa Aharaz
- The Capital Region Pharmacy, 2730 Herlev, Denmark; (H.B.Ø.M.); (A.K.B.); (H.R.C.S.); (R.R.L.S.); (C.T.); (M.B.H.)
- Multidisciplinary Outpatient Clinic (Fællesambulatoriet, subakutte patientforløb), Copenhagen University Hospital—Amager and Hvidovre, 2300 Copenhagen, Denmark; (J.H.R.); (A.C.)
- Department of Clinical Research, Copenhagen University Hospital—Amager and Hvidovre, 2650 Copenhagen, Denmark;
| | - Jens Henning Rasmussen
- Multidisciplinary Outpatient Clinic (Fællesambulatoriet, subakutte patientforløb), Copenhagen University Hospital—Amager and Hvidovre, 2300 Copenhagen, Denmark; (J.H.R.); (A.C.)
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Copenhagen University Hospital—Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg, 2400 Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Helle Bach Ølgaard McNulty
- The Capital Region Pharmacy, 2730 Herlev, Denmark; (H.B.Ø.M.); (A.K.B.); (H.R.C.S.); (R.R.L.S.); (C.T.); (M.B.H.)
| | - Arne Cyron
- Multidisciplinary Outpatient Clinic (Fællesambulatoriet, subakutte patientforløb), Copenhagen University Hospital—Amager and Hvidovre, 2300 Copenhagen, Denmark; (J.H.R.); (A.C.)
| | - Pia Keinicke Fabricius
- Department of Clinical Research, Copenhagen University Hospital—Amager and Hvidovre, 2650 Copenhagen, Denmark;
| | - Anne Kathrine Bengaard
- The Capital Region Pharmacy, 2730 Herlev, Denmark; (H.B.Ø.M.); (A.K.B.); (H.R.C.S.); (R.R.L.S.); (C.T.); (M.B.H.)
- Department of Clinical Research, Copenhagen University Hospital—Amager and Hvidovre, 2650 Copenhagen, Denmark;
- Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, 2200 Copenhagen, Denmark
| | | | - Rikke Rie Løvig Simonsen
- The Capital Region Pharmacy, 2730 Herlev, Denmark; (H.B.Ø.M.); (A.K.B.); (H.R.C.S.); (R.R.L.S.); (C.T.); (M.B.H.)
| | - Charlotte Treldal
- The Capital Region Pharmacy, 2730 Herlev, Denmark; (H.B.Ø.M.); (A.K.B.); (H.R.C.S.); (R.R.L.S.); (C.T.); (M.B.H.)
- Department of Clinical Research, Copenhagen University Hospital—Amager and Hvidovre, 2650 Copenhagen, Denmark;
| | - Morten Baltzer Houlind
- The Capital Region Pharmacy, 2730 Herlev, Denmark; (H.B.Ø.M.); (A.K.B.); (H.R.C.S.); (R.R.L.S.); (C.T.); (M.B.H.)
- Department of Clinical Research, Copenhagen University Hospital—Amager and Hvidovre, 2650 Copenhagen, Denmark;
- Department of Drug Design and Pharmacology, University of Copenhagen, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Jungo KT, Mantelli S, Rozsnyai Z, Missiou A, Kitanovska BG, Weltermann B, Mallen C, Collins C, Bonfim D, Kurpas D, Petrazzuoli F, Dumitra G, Thulesius H, Lingner H, Johansen KL, Wallis K, Hoffmann K, Peremans L, Pilv L, Šter MP, Bleckwenn M, Sattler M, van der Ploeg M, Torzsa P, Kánská PB, Vinker S, Assenova R, Bravo RG, Viegas RPA, Tsopra R, Pestic SK, Gintere S, Koskela TH, Lazic V, Tkachenko V, Reeve E, Luymes C, Poortvliet RKE, Rodondi N, Gussekloo J, Streit S. General practitioners' deprescribing decisions in older adults with polypharmacy: a case vignette study in 31 countries. BMC Geriatr 2021; 21:19. [PMID: 33413142 PMCID: PMC7792080 DOI: 10.1186/s12877-020-01953-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/06/2020] [Accepted: 12/09/2020] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND General practitioners (GPs) should regularly review patients' medications and, if necessary, deprescribe, as inappropriate polypharmacy may harm patients' health. However, deprescribing can be challenging for physicians. This study investigates GPs' deprescribing decisions in 31 countries. METHODS In this case vignette study, GPs were invited to participate in an online survey containing three clinical cases of oldest-old multimorbid patients with potentially inappropriate polypharmacy. Patients differed in terms of dependency in activities of daily living (ADL) and were presented with and without history of cardiovascular disease (CVD). For each case, we asked GPs if they would deprescribe in their usual practice. We calculated proportions of GPs who reported they would deprescribe and performed a multilevel logistic regression to examine the association between history of CVD and level of dependency on GPs' deprescribing decisions. RESULTS Of 3,175 invited GPs, 54% responded (N = 1,706). The mean age was 50 years and 60% of respondents were female. Despite differences across GP characteristics, such as age (with older GPs being more likely to take deprescribing decisions), and across countries, overall more than 80% of GPs reported they would deprescribe the dosage of at least one medication in oldest-old patients (> 80 years) with polypharmacy irrespective of history of CVD. The odds of deprescribing was higher in patients with a higher level of dependency in ADL (OR =1.5, 95%CI 1.25 to 1.80) and absence of CVD (OR =3.04, 95%CI 2.58 to 3.57). INTERPRETATION The majority of GPs in this study were willing to deprescribe one or more medications in oldest-old multimorbid patients with polypharmacy. Willingness was higher in patients with increased dependency in ADL and lower in patients with CVD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Sophie Mantelli
- Institute of Primary Health Care (BIHAM), University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Zsofia Rozsnyai
- Institute of Primary Health Care (BIHAM), University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Aristea Missiou
- Research Unit for General Medicine and Primary Health Care, Faculty of Medicine, School of Health Sciences, University of Ioannina, Ioannina, Greece
| | - Biljana Gerasimovska Kitanovska
- Department of Nephrology and Department of Family Medicine, University Clinical Centre, University St. Cyril and Metodius, Skopje, Macedonia
| | - Birgitta Weltermann
- Institute for General Practice, University of Duisburg-Essen, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.,Institute of General Practice and Family Medicine, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Christian Mallen
- Primary, Community and Social Care, Keele University, Keele, Staffordshire, ST5 5BG,, United Kingdom
| | | | - Daiana Bonfim
- Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Donata Kurpas
- Family Medicine Department, Wroclaw Medical University, Wrocław, Poland
| | - Ferdinando Petrazzuoli
- Department of Clinical Sciences, Centre for Primary Health Care Research, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden
| | | | - Hans Thulesius
- Department of Clinical Sciences, Centre for Primary Health Care Research, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden.,Department of Medicine and Optometry, Linnaeus University, Kalmar, Sweden
| | - Heidrun Lingner
- Hannover Medical School, Center for Public Health and Healthcare, Hannover, Germany
| | | | - Katharine Wallis
- Primary Care Clinical Unit, the University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Kathryn Hoffmann
- Department of General Practice and Family Medicine, Center for Public Health, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Lieve Peremans
- Department of Primary and Interdisciplinary Care, University Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.,Department of Nursing and Midwifery, University Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Liina Pilv
- Department of Family Medicine, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia
| | - Marija Petek Šter
- Department of Family Medicine, Medical Faculty, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Markus Bleckwenn
- Department of General Practice, Faculty of Medicine, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Martin Sattler
- SSLMG, Societé Scientifique Luxembourgois en Medicine generale, Luxembourg City, Luxembourg
| | - Milly van der Ploeg
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Péter Torzsa
- Department of Family Medicine, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Petra Bomberová Kánská
- Department of Social Medicine, Charles University, Faculty of Medicine in Hradec Kralove, Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic
| | - Shlomo Vinker
- Department of Family Medicine, Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Radost Assenova
- Department of Urology and General Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Medical University of Plovdiv, Plovdiv, Bulgaria
| | - Raquel Gomez Bravo
- Institute for Health and Behaviour, Research Unit INSIDE, University of Luxembourg, Luxembourg, Luxembourg
| | - Rita P A Viegas
- Family Doctor, Invited Assistant of the Department of Family Medicine, NOVA Medical School, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Rosy Tsopra
- INSERM, Université de Paris, Sorbonne Université, Centre de Recherche des Cordeliers, Information Sciences to support Personalized Medicine, F-75006, Paris, France.,Department of Medical Informatics, Hôpital Européen Georges-Pompidou, AP-HP, Paris, France
| | - Sanda Kreitmayer Pestic
- Family Medicine Department, Medical School, University of Tuzla, Tuzla, Bosnia and Herzegovina
| | - Sandra Gintere
- Faculty of Medicine, Department of Family Medicine, Riga Stradiņs University, Riga, Latvia
| | - Tuomas H Koskela
- Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland
| | - Vanja Lazic
- Dom zdravlja Zagreb - Centar, Zagreb, Croatia
| | - Victoria Tkachenko
- Department of Family Medicine, Institute of Family Medicine at Shupyk National Medical Academy of Postgraduate Education, Kyiv, Ukraine
| | - Emily Reeve
- Quality Use of Medicines and Pharmacy Research Centre, UniSA: Clinical and Health Sciences, University of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.,Geriatric Medicine Research, Faculty of Medicine and College of Pharmacy, Dalhousie University and Nova Scotia Health Authority, Halifax, NS, Canada
| | - Clare Luymes
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.,UWV (Employee Insurance Agency), Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Rosalinde K E Poortvliet
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Nicolas Rodondi
- Institute of Primary Health Care (BIHAM), University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.,Department of General Internal Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Jacobijn Gussekloo
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.,Department of Internal Medicine, Section Gerontology and Geriatrics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Sven Streit
- Institute of Primary Health Care (BIHAM), University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Opioid prescribing and risk of drug-opioid interactions in older discharged patients with polypharmacy in Australia. Int J Clin Pharm 2020; 43:365-374. [PMID: 33206289 DOI: 10.1007/s11096-020-01191-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/14/2020] [Accepted: 10/28/2020] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Abstract
Background Opioids are commonly prescribed to managing chronic pain in older persons. However, these patients are often at risk of drug-opioid interactions due to polypharmacy. Objectives To identify the prevalence of opioid prescribing and drug-opioid interactions in poly-medicated older patients and factors associated with opioid prescribing. Setting Patients were included if they were admitted to the Royal Adelaide Hospital between September 2015 and August 2016, aged ≥ 75 years and took ≥ 5 medications at discharge. Methods After ethics approval, data of were retrospectively collected from case notes. The Charlson Comorbidity Index and Drug Burden Index were determined and opioids were classified as strong or weak. The association between opioid use and concurrent medications was computed using logistic regression and the results presented as odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI), adjusted for age, sex, Charlson Comorbidity Index, number of prescribed medications and modified-Drug Burden Index. Main outcome measure Association between concurrent medications and opioid prescribing. Results 15,000 geriatric admissions were identified, of which 1192 were included. A total of 283 (23.7%) patients were prescribed opioids, with oxycodone accounting for 56% of these prescriptions. Opioid users were prescribed more medications (11.2 vs. 9.0, P < 0.001) and had higher Drug Burden Index (1.2 vs. 0.14, P < 0.001) compared to non-users. Opioid use was associated with concurrent prescription of antiepileptics (OR = 1.7, 95% CI 1.1-2.6), and negatively associated with Charlson Comorbidity Index (OR = 0.9, 95% CI 0.8-0.98) and concurrent use of antipsychotics (OR = 0.5, 95% CI 0.3-0.9) and beta blocking agents (OR = 0.4, 95% CI 0.3-0.6). Conclusions Strong opioids were prescribed more often than weak opioids and opioid users presented with characteristics and concurrent medications which increased the risk of opioid related adverse drug effects.
Collapse
|
12
|
Ali MU, Sherifali D, Fitzpatrick-Lewis D, Kenny M, Liu A, Lamarche L, Mangin D, Raina P. Polypharmacy and mobility outcomes. Mech Ageing Dev 2020; 192:111356. [PMID: 32991919 DOI: 10.1016/j.mad.2020.111356] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2020] [Revised: 09/02/2020] [Accepted: 09/07/2020] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Polypharmacy is known to be associated with negative consequences of mobility related conditions such as falls, functional decline and disability. This systematic review highlights the effectiveness of deprescribing interventions on mobility related conditions in older adults in the community dwelling reported taking five or more medications daily.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Muhammad Usman Ali
- McMaster Evidence Review and Synthesis Team, McMaster University, 1280 Main St. W., McMaster Innovation Park, Room 207A, Hamilton, Ontario, L8S 4K1, Canada; Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Room HSC-2C, 1200 Main Street West, Hamilton, Ontario, L8N 3Z5, Canada.
| | - Diana Sherifali
- McMaster Evidence Review and Synthesis Team, McMaster University, 1280 Main St. W., McMaster Innovation Park, Room 207A, Hamilton, Ontario, L8S 4K1, Canada; School of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Health Sciences Centre Room HSC-3N25F, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, Ontario, L8S 4K1, Canada.
| | - Donna Fitzpatrick-Lewis
- McMaster Evidence Review and Synthesis Team, McMaster University, 1280 Main St. W., McMaster Innovation Park, Room 207A, Hamilton, Ontario, L8S 4K1, Canada; School of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Health Sciences Centre Room HSC-3N25F, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, Ontario, L8S 4K1, Canada.
| | - Meghan Kenny
- McMaster Evidence Review and Synthesis Team, McMaster University, 1280 Main St. W., McMaster Innovation Park, Room 207A, Hamilton, Ontario, L8S 4K1, Canada; Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Room HSC-2C, 1200 Main Street West, Hamilton, Ontario, L8N 3Z5, Canada.
| | - April Liu
- McMaster University, 1280 Main St. W., Hamilton, Ontario, L8S 4L8, Canada.
| | - Larkin Lamarche
- McMaster University, Dept. of Family Medicine DBHSC, 5th Floor 100 Main St West, Hamilton,Ontario L8P 1H6, Canada.
| | - Derelie Mangin
- McMaster University, Dept. of Family Medicine DBHSC, 5th Floor 100 Main St West, Hamilton,Ontario L8P 1H6, Canada.
| | - Parminder Raina
- McMaster Evidence Review and Synthesis Team, McMaster University, 1280 Main St. W., McMaster Innovation Park, Room 207A, Hamilton, Ontario, L8S 4K1, Canada; Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Room HSC-2C, 1200 Main Street West, Hamilton, Ontario, L8N 3Z5, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Houlind MB, Andersen AL, Treldal C, Jørgensen LM, Kannegaard PN, Castillo LS, Christensen LD, Tavenier J, Rasmussen LJH, Ankarfeldt MZ, Andersen O, Petersen J. A Collaborative Medication Review Including Deprescribing for Older Patients in an Emergency Department: A Longitudinal Feasibility Study. J Clin Med 2020; 9:jcm9020348. [PMID: 32012721 PMCID: PMC7074203 DOI: 10.3390/jcm9020348] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/27/2019] [Revised: 01/22/2020] [Accepted: 01/24/2020] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Medication review for older patients with polypharmacy in the emergency department (ED) is crucial to prevent inappropriate prescribing. Our objective was to assess the feasibility of a collaborative medication review in older medical patients (≥65 years) using polypharmacy (≥5 long-term medications). A pharmacist performed the medication review using the tools: Screening Tool of Older Persons’ potentially inappropriate Prescriptions (STOPP) criteria, a drug–drug interaction database (SFINX), and Renbase® (renal dosing database). A geriatrician received the medication review and decided which recommendations should be implemented. The outcomes were: differences in Medication Appropriateness Index (MAI) and Assessment of Underutilization Index (AOU) scores between admission and 30 days after discharge and the percentage of patients for which the intervention was completed before discharge. Sixty patients were included from the ED, the intervention was completed before discharge for 50 patients (83%), and 39 (61.5% male; median age 80 years) completed the follow-up 30 days after discharge. The median MAI score decreased from 14 (IQR 8-20) at admission to 8 (IQR 2-13) 30 days after discharge (p < 0.001). The number of patients with an AOU score ≥1 was reduced from 36% to 10% (p < 0.001). Thirty days after discharge, 83% of the changes were sustained and for 28 patients (72%), 1≥ medication had been deprescribed. In conclusion, a collaborative medication review and deprescribing intervention is feasible to perform in the ED.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Morten Baltzer Houlind
- Clinical Research Centre, Copenhagen University Hospital Amager and Hvidovre, 2650 Hvidovre, Denmark
- The Capital Region Pharmacy, 2730 Herlev, Denmark
- Department of Drug Design and Pharmacology, University of Copenhagen, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: + 45-28-85-85-63
| | - Aino Leegaard Andersen
- Clinical Research Centre, Copenhagen University Hospital Amager and Hvidovre, 2650 Hvidovre, Denmark
| | - Charlotte Treldal
- Clinical Research Centre, Copenhagen University Hospital Amager and Hvidovre, 2650 Hvidovre, Denmark
- The Capital Region Pharmacy, 2730 Herlev, Denmark
- Department of Drug Design and Pharmacology, University of Copenhagen, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Lillian Mørch Jørgensen
- Clinical Research Centre, Copenhagen University Hospital Amager and Hvidovre, 2650 Hvidovre, Denmark
| | - Pia Nimann Kannegaard
- Department of Geriatric Medicine, Copenhagen University Hospital Herlev and Gentofte, 2900 Hellerup, Denmark
| | - Luana Sandoval Castillo
- Department of Geriatrics, Copenhagen University Hospital Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg, 2400 Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Line Due Christensen
- Clinical Research Centre, Copenhagen University Hospital Amager and Hvidovre, 2650 Hvidovre, Denmark
- Research Unit for General Practice, 8000 Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Juliette Tavenier
- Clinical Research Centre, Copenhagen University Hospital Amager and Hvidovre, 2650 Hvidovre, Denmark
| | - Line Jee Hartmann Rasmussen
- Clinical Research Centre, Copenhagen University Hospital Amager and Hvidovre, 2650 Hvidovre, Denmark
- Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708, USA
| | - Mikkel. Zöllner Ankarfeldt
- Clinical Research Centre, Copenhagen University Hospital Amager and Hvidovre, 2650 Hvidovre, Denmark
- Copenhagen Phase IV unit (Phase4CPH), Center of Clinical Research and Prevention and Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Copenhagen University Hospital Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg, 2000 Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Ove Andersen
- Clinical Research Centre, Copenhagen University Hospital Amager and Hvidovre, 2650 Hvidovre, Denmark
- Emergency Department, Copenhagen University Hospital Amager and Hvidovre, 2650 Hvidovre, Denmark
| | - Janne Petersen
- Clinical Research Centre, Copenhagen University Hospital Amager and Hvidovre, 2650 Hvidovre, Denmark
- Copenhagen Phase IV unit (Phase4CPH), Center of Clinical Research and Prevention and Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Copenhagen University Hospital Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg, 2000 Copenhagen, Denmark
- Section of Biostatistics, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, 1014 Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Essebag V, AlTurki A, Proietti R, Healey JS, Wells GA, Verma A, Krahn AD, Simpson CS, Ayala-Paredes F, Coutu B, Leather R, Ahmad K, Toal S, Sapp J, Sturmer M, Kavanagh K, Crystal E, Leiria TL, Seifer C, Rinne C, Birnie D. Concomitant anti-platelet therapy in warfarin-treated patients undergoing cardiac rhythm device implantation: A secondary analysis of the BRUISE CONTROL trial. Int J Cardiol 2019; 288:87-93. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2019.04.066] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/22/2019] [Revised: 03/03/2019] [Accepted: 04/23/2019] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
|
15
|
Moesker MJ, Schutijser BCFM, de Groot JF, Langelaan M, Spreeuwenberg P, Huisman MV, de Bruijne MC, Wagner C. Occurrence of Antithrombotic Related Adverse Events in Hospitalized Patients: Incidence and Clinical Context between 2008 and 2016. J Clin Med 2019; 8:E839. [PMID: 31212825 PMCID: PMC6617527 DOI: 10.3390/jcm8060839] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/13/2019] [Revised: 05/24/2019] [Accepted: 06/06/2019] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Antithrombotic drugs are consistently involved in medication-related adverse events (MRAEs) in hospitalized patients. We aimed to estimate the antithrombotic-related adverse event (ARAE) incidence between 2008 and 2016 and analyse their clinical context in hospitalized patients in The Netherlands. A post-hoc analysis of three national studies, aimed at adverse event (AE) identification, was performed. Previously identified AEs were screened for antithrombotic involvement. Crude and multi-level, case-mix adjusted ARAE and MRAE incidences were calculated. Various contextual ARAE characteristics were analysed. ARAE incidence between 2008 and 2016 decreased significantly in in-hospital deceased patients from 1.20% (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.63-2.27%) in 2008 to 0.54% (95% CI: 0.27-1.11%) in 2015/2016 (p = 0.02). In discharged patients ARAE incidence remained stable. By comparison, overall MRAE incidence remained stable for both deceased and discharged patients. Most ARAEs involved Vitamin-K antagonists (VKAs). Preventable ARAEs occurred more during weekends and with increasing multidisciplinary involvement. Antiplatelet and combined antithrombotic use seemed to be increasingly involved in ARAEs over time. ARAE incidence declined by 55% in deceased patients between 2008 and 2016. Opportunities for improving antithrombotic safety should target INR monitoring and care delivery aspects such as multidisciplinary involvement and weekend care. Future ARAE monitoring for the involvement of antiplatelet, combined antithrombotic and direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) use is recommended.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marco J Moesker
- Department of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 BT Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Bernadette C F M Schutijser
- Department of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 BT Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Janke F de Groot
- Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research (NIVEL), 3513 CR Utrecht, The Netherlands.
| | | | - Peter Spreeuwenberg
- Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research (NIVEL), 3513 CR Utrecht, The Netherlands.
| | - Menno V Huisman
- Department of Thrombosis and Hemostasis, Leiden University Medical Center, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands.
| | - Martine C de Bruijne
- Department of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 BT Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Cordula Wagner
- Department of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 BT Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
- Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research (NIVEL), 3513 CR Utrecht, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Simões PA, Santiago LM, Maurício K, Simões JA. Prevalence Of Potentially Inappropriate Medication In The Older Adult Population Within Primary Care In Portugal: A Nationwide Cross-Sectional Study. Patient Prefer Adherence 2019; 13:1569-1576. [PMID: 31571839 PMCID: PMC6756837 DOI: 10.2147/ppa.s219346] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/13/2019] [Accepted: 08/21/2019] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In potentially inappropriate medications harm potentially outweighs benefits. Even appropriately prescribed medications may become inappropriate. They can lead to a high risk of adverse drug reactions, morbidity and mortality. The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of potentially inappropriate medication in the older adult population attending primary care in Portugal and to identify associated sociodemographic and clinical factors. METHODS We conducted a cross-sectional, analytical study in primary care centres from the five Portuguese healthcare administrative regions and the two autonomous regions. We used a random sample of 757 older patients provided by the information department of the ministry of health (SPMS) and family doctors from the autonomous regions. Data collection occurred March 2018 and we studied sociodemographic characteristics, clinical profile and medication. We used 2015 Beers Criteria to assess potentially inappropriate medications. Logistic regression analyses were performed to determine associations between potentially inappropriate medications' prescriptions and other variables. RESULTS Potentially inappropriate medication was present in 68.6% and 46.1% of the sample had two or more. The likelihood of having potentially inappropriate medication increased significantly with being female (OR=1.56 [1.05 to 2.31]), number of chronic health problems (OR=1.06 [1.01 to 1.13]), number of pharmacological subclasses (OR=1.40 [1.30 to 1.51]) and number of prescribers (OR=1.34 [1.09 to 1.65]). Proton-pump inhibitors, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and benzodiazepines were the most commonly found ones. CONCLUSION Potentially inappropriate medication in older adults was found to be a common occurrence in Portugal. It is important that doctors are aware of this problem, namely in the primary care setting due to the longitudinal care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pedro Augusto Simões
- Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Beira Interior, Covilhã, Portugal
- ARS Centro, USF Pulsar, Coimbra, Portugal
- Correspondence: Pedro Augusto Simões ARS Centro, USF Pulsar, Rua Teófilo Braga, nº 25 5º Dto, Coimbra3030-076, PortugalTel +351 239 968384396 Email
| | - Luiz Miguel Santiago
- University of Coimbra, Faculty of Medicine, Coimbra, Portugal
- University of Coimbra, General Practice/Family Medicine University Clinic of the Faculty of Medicine, Coimbra, Portugal
- University of Coimbra, CEISUC – Center for Health Studies and Research, Coimbra, Portugal
| | - Katia Maurício
- University of Coimbra, Faculty of Medicine, Coimbra, Portugal
| | - José Augusto Simões
- Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Beira Interior, Covilhã, Portugal
- ARS Centro, USF Caminhos Do Cértoma, Mealhada, Portugal
- University of Porto, CINTESIS – Centre for Research in Health Technologies and Service, Oporto, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Impact of deprescribing rounds on discharge prescriptions: an interventional trial. Int J Clin Pharm 2018; 41:159-166. [PMID: 30478496 DOI: 10.1007/s11096-018-0753-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/16/2018] [Accepted: 11/08/2018] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Background Successful deprescribing practices are required to address issues associated with polypharmacy but are hindered by minimal interprofessional collaboration, time constraints, concern for negative outcomes, and absence of a systematic and evidence-based approach. Objective Determine the impact of pharmacist-led deprescribing rounds within a clinical teaching unit (CTU) the number of home medications discontinued upon hospital discharge. Setting Canadian tertiary care hospital. Methods Prospective, dual-arm, interventional study conducted in a single centre, from November 23rd, 2015 to August 30th, 2016. All patients ≥ 19 years old admitted under the CTU were considered for enrolment if on medication(s) prior to admission and patients were excluded if not taking any medications. Study arm allocation alternated daily between the two teams. The control arm operated as per standard whereas the intervention arm's pharmacist used a deprescribing guide and medication review to identify medications eligible for discontinuation prior to discussing during daily rounds. Discharge documents communicated medication changes to patient and primary healthcare providers. The study was sufficiently powered. Main outcome measure The difference of number of home medications discontinued at discharge between the intervention and control groups. Results 171 and 187 patients were allocated to the intervention and control arms, respectively. No significant differences of baseline characteristics existed between groups. Main outcome measure results showed that deprescribing rounds resulted in significantly more medications deprescribed compared to control (65% vs. 38%; p = 0.001). The rates of readmission and emergency department visits were reduced in the intervention arm. Conclusions Incorporating deprescribing rounds into routine care led to significantly greater discontinuation of medications without increasing rate of emergency department visits or hospital admissions.Trial registration ISRCTN11751440.
Collapse
|
18
|
Deprescribing in Geriatric Medicine: Challenges and Opportunities. J Am Med Dir Assoc 2018; 19:919-922. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jamda.2018.09.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/18/2018] [Accepted: 09/20/2018] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
|
19
|
Wan A, Halpape K, Talkhi SC, Dixon C, Dossa H, Tabamo J, Roberts M, Dahri K. Evaluation of Prescribing Appropriateness and Initiatives to Improve Prescribing of Proton Pump Inhibitors at Vancouver General Hospital. Can J Hosp Pharm 2018; 71:308-315. [PMID: 30401997 PMCID: PMC6209498] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) have proven clinical efficacy for a variety of indications. However, there is emerging evidence of adverse events associated with their long-term use. The emergence of these adverse events has reinforced the need to regularly evaluate the appropriateness of continuing PPI therapy, and to use only the lowest effective dose for the minimally indicated duration. OBJECTIVES To characterize the appropriateness of PPI orders continued or initiated in the internal medicine and family practice units of Vancouver General Hospital, to detect adverse events associated with PPI use, and to explore the impact of multidisciplinary teaching and provision of educational resources on health care practitioners' views about PPI use. METHODS A chart review was conducted for patients admitted (for at least 24 hours) between January 1 and December 31, 2015, for whom a hospital formulary PPI was prescribed. An educational initiative, which included interprofessional in-service sessions, a PPI prescribing infographic, a PPI prescribing card, and a patient counselling sheet, was implemented. The impact of these interventions was assessed using a qualitative survey of health care practitioners. RESULTS Of the 258 patients whose charts were reviewed, 175 had a PPI prescription before hospital admission, and 83 were initiated on PPI therapy during their hospital stay. Overall, 94 (36%) of the patients were receiving PPIs without an appropriate indication. Community-acquired pneumonia and Clostridium difficile infections were the most common adverse events potentially associated with PPI use. In-service sessions and educational resources on PPI prescribing were reported to affect the clinical practice of 24 (52%) of the 46 survey respondents. CONCLUSIONS The results of this study emphasize the need for ongoing re-evaluation of long-term PPI therapy at the time of admission, during the hospital stay, and upon discharge. Implementing multidisciplinary teaching and providing educational resources may encourage more appropriate prescribing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea Wan
- , BSc(Pharm), ACPR, is with the Department of Pharmacy, St Paul's Hospital, Vancouver, British Columbia
| | - Katelyn Halpape
- , BSc(Pharm), ACPR, PharmD, is with the Department of Pharmacy, Vancouver General Hospital, Vancouver, British Columbia
| | - Shirin C Talkhi
- , BSc(Pharm), was, at the time of this study, an undergraduate student in the Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia
| | - Claire Dixon
- , BSc(Pharm), was, at the time of this study, an undergraduate student in the Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia
| | - Hafeez Dossa
- , BSc(Pharm), was, at the time of this study, an undergraduate student in the Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia
| | - Jenifer Tabamo
- , RN, is with the Department of Medicine, Vancouver General Hospital, Vancouver, British Columbia
| | - Mark Roberts
- , MD, is with the Department of Medicine, Vancouver General Hospital, Vancouver, British Columbia
| | - Karen Dahri
- , BSc, BSc(Pharm), ACPR, PharmD, is with the Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, The University of British Columbia, and the Department of Pharmacy Vancouver General Hospital, Vancouver, British Columbia
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Simões PA, Santiago LM, Simões JA. Deprescribing in primary care in Portugal (DePil17-20): a three-phase observational and experimental study protocol. BMJ Open 2018; 8:e019542. [PMID: 30018092 PMCID: PMC6059343 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019542] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/22/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Polypharmacy is commonly defined as the simultaneous taking of five or more drugs. Deprescribing is the process of tapering or stopping medications with the aim of improving patient outcomes and optimising current therapy, and there are several tools aiming at identifying potentially inappropriate medications, especially in the elderly. The direct involvement of patients and their caregivers in the choice and administration of drugs has long been known to be very important, but it is not usually applied. The aim of this study is to assess the knowledge of older adults about deprescription, the effect on willingness to have regular medications deprescribed and its quality-of-life outcome. METHODS AND ANALYSIS This study protocol comprises three phases. The first two phases will be nationwide and aim to evaluate the prevalence and patterns of polypharmacy and assess the barriers and facilitators of deprescribing perceived by older adults, as well as their willingness to have regular medications deprescribed and to self-medicate. The third and last phase will be a non-pharmacological randomised clinical study to measure older patients' acceptance to have regular medications deprescribed and related quality of life. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION The study will be conducted in accordance with the principles expressed in the Declaration of Helsinki. It has been approved by the Ethics Committee of the University of Beira Interior and Portuguese National Data Protection Commission. Study results will be published in peer-reviewed journals and presented at national and international conferences. In short, no action will be taken without written consent from patients and doctors. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER > NCT03283735.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pedro Augusto Simões
- Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Beira Interior, Covilhã, Portugal
- USF Pulsar, ARS Centro, Coimbra, Portugal
| | - Luiz Miguel Santiago
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal
- USF Topázio, ARS Centro, Coimbra, Portugal
| | - José Augusto Simões
- Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Beira Interior, Covilhã, Portugal
- UCSP Mealhada, ARS Centro, Mealhada, Portugal
- CINTESIS - Centre for Research in Health Technologies and Service, Porto, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Page A, Clifford R, Potter K, Etherton-Beer C. A concept analysis of deprescribing medications in older people. JOURNAL OF PHARMACY PRACTICE AND RESEARCH 2018. [DOI: 10.1002/jppr.1361] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Amy Page
- School of Medicine and Pharmacology; University of Western Australia; Crawley Australia
| | - Rhonda Clifford
- School of Medicine and Pharmacology; University of Western Australia; Crawley Australia
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
22
|
Linsky A, Simon SR, Stolzmann K, Meterko M. Patient attitudes and experiences that predict medication discontinuation in the Veterans Health Administration. J Am Pharm Assoc (2003) 2017; 58:13-20. [PMID: 29154017 DOI: 10.1016/j.japh.2017.10.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/22/2017] [Revised: 10/16/2017] [Accepted: 10/20/2017] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Polypharmacy is associated with adverse medication effects. One potential solution is deprescribing, which is the intentional, proactive, rational discontinuation of a medication that is no longer indicated or for which the potential harms outweigh the potential benefits. We identified patient characteristics, attitudes, and health care experiences associated with medication discontinuation. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS We conducted a national mail survey, with the use of the Patient Perceptions of Discontinuation (PPoD) instrument, of 1600 veterans receiving primary care at Veterans Affairs (VA) medical centers and prescribed 5 or more concurrent medications. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES The primary outcome was the response to: "Have you ever stopped taking a medicine (with or without your doctor's knowledge)?" The primary predictors of interest were 8 validated attitudinal scales. Other predictors included demographics, health status, and health care experiences. RESULTS Respondents (n = 803; adjusted response rate 52%) were predominantly male (85%); non-Hispanic white (68%), 65 years of age or older (60%), and with poor (16%) or fair (45%) health. Participant attitudes toward medications and their providers were generally favorable. One in 3 patients (34%) reported having stopped a medicine in the past. In a multivariable logistic regression model (P < 0.001; pseudo-R2 = 0.31; c-statistic = 0.82), factors associated with discontinuation included being told or asking to stop a medicine, greater interest in deprescribing and shared decision making, and higher education. Factors associated with decreased discontinuation were more prescriptions, higher trust in provider, and seeing a VA clinical pharmacist. CONCLUSION More highly educated patients with interest in deprescribing and shared decision making may be more receptive to discontinuation discussions. Future research evaluating how to incorporate this survey and these findings into clinical workflow through the design of clinical interventions may help to promote safe and rational medication use.
Collapse
|
23
|
Baqir W, Hughes J, Jones T, Barrett S, Desai N, Copeland R, Campbell D, Laverty A. Impact of medication review, within a shared decision-making framework, on deprescribing in people living in care homes. Eur J Hosp Pharm 2016; 24:30-33. [PMID: 31156894 DOI: 10.1136/ejhpharm-2016-000900] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Abstract
Objectives The key objectives of this study were to quantify extent of prescribing, reasons for deprescribing, common therapeutic groups of medicines deprescribed and adverse events. Methods A retrospective analysis was carried out on a quality improvement project where 422 care home residents in 20 care homes received a medicines optimisation review with a pharmacist and other members of the healthcare team (general medical practitioner, care home nurse). Data on number, type and cost of medicines were collected. Statistical analysis was performed to test for differences between pharmacist-only review and the pharmacist plus general practitioner (GP), and to identify any correlation between the original number of medicines and the number of medicines stopped. Results Of the 422 patients reviewed, 298 (70.6%) had at least one medicine stopped with 704 medicines being stopped. This represented 19.5% of the medicines originally prescribed (3602 medicines). There was no statistically significant difference between pharmacist only and pharmacist plus GP in terms of stopping medicines. The main groups of medicines stopped were laxatives, skin products and bone protection. There was weak correlation between the original number of medicines prescribed and the number stopped. Conclusions This study has shown that medicines optimisation reviews can lead to a reduction in polypharmacy for care home residents through a deprescribing process. Patients' medicine regimens were simplified and optimised while making financial significant savings for the National Health Service.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wasim Baqir
- Department of Pharmacy, Northumbria Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, North Shields, UK.,Department of Pharmacy, University of Bradford, School of Pharmacy, Bradford, Bradford, UK
| | - Julian Hughes
- Department of Pharmacy, Northumbria Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, North Shields, UK
| | - Tania Jones
- Department of Pharmacy Health and Well-being, University of Sunderland, Sunderland, UK
| | - Steven Barrett
- Department of Pharmacy, Northumbria Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, North Shields, UK
| | - Nisha Desai
- Department of Pharmacy, Northumbria Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, North Shields, UK
| | - Richard Copeland
- Department of Pharmacy, Northumbria Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, North Shields, UK
| | - David Campbell
- Department of Pharmacy, Northumbria Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, North Shields, UK
| | - Annie Laverty
- Department of Pharmacy, Northumbria Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, North Shields, UK
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Kouladjian L, Chen TF, Gnjidic D, Hilmer SN. Education and Assessment of Pharmacists on the Use of the Drug Burden Index in Older Adults Using a Continuing Professional Development Education Method. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL EDUCATION 2016; 80:63. [PMID: 27293230 PMCID: PMC4891861 DOI: 10.5688/ajpe80463] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/27/2015] [Accepted: 08/18/2015] [Indexed: 06/06/2023]
Abstract
Objective. To educate pharmacists and assess their knowledge of and ability to calculate the Drug Burden Index (DBI) using a continuing professional development (CPD) intervention. Methods. The intervention included designing education surrounding the DBI and its application in practice and assessing knowledge in the form of a CPD education article with four multiple-choice questions (MCQs). Deidentified demographic data on participants were collected. Results. Multiple-choice questions were completed by 2522 pharmacist participants: 97.9% of participants successfully completed the CPD assessment (answered three or four MCQs correctly), and 76.5% of participants achieved a perfect score (answered four MCQs correctly). The question that required calculation of the DBI for a fictional patient was answered correctly least often (81.8%). Conclusion. Pharmacist participants had good knowledge of using DBI in practice; difficulty was observed in calculating the DBI for a hypothetical patient. This CPD intervention provided a practical medium for educating and assessing pharmacists' knowledge of the DBI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lisa Kouladjian
- Departments of Clinical Pharmacology and Aged Care, Kolling Institute of Medical Research, Northern Sydney Local Health District, St. Leonards, New South Wales, Australia
- Sydney Medical School – Northern, University of Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Timothy F. Chen
- Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Danijela Gnjidic
- Departments of Clinical Pharmacology and Aged Care, Kolling Institute of Medical Research, Northern Sydney Local Health District, St. Leonards, New South Wales, Australia
- Sydney Medical School – Northern, University of Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Sarah N. Hilmer
- Departments of Clinical Pharmacology and Aged Care, Kolling Institute of Medical Research, Northern Sydney Local Health District, St. Leonards, New South Wales, Australia
- Sydney Medical School – Northern, University of Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Pollmann AS, Murphy AL, Bergman JC, Gardner DM. Deprescribing benzodiazepines and Z-drugs in community-dwelling adults: a scoping review. BMC Pharmacol Toxicol 2015; 16:19. [PMID: 26141716 PMCID: PMC4491204 DOI: 10.1186/s40360-015-0019-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 63] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2015] [Accepted: 06/23/2015] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Long-term sedative use is prevalent and associated with significant morbidity, including adverse events such as falls, cognitive impairment, and sedation. The development of dependence can pose significant challenges when discontinuation is attempted as withdrawal symptoms often develop. We conducted a scoping review to map and characterize the literature and determine opportunities for future research regarding deprescribing strategies for long-term benzodiazepine and Z-drug (zopiclone, zolpidem, and zaleplon) use in community-dwelling adults. METHODS We searched PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, EMBASE, PsycINFO, CINAHL, TRIP, and JBI Ovid databases and conducted a grey literature search. Articles discussing methods for deprescribing benzodiazepines or Z-drugs in community-dwelling adults were selected. RESULTS Following removal of duplicates, 2797 articles were reviewed for eligibility. Of these, 367 were retrieved for full-text assessment and 139 were subsequently included for review. Seventy-four (53%) articles were original research, predominantly randomized controlled trials (n = 52 [37%]), whereas 58 (42%) were narrative reviews and seven (5%) were guidelines. Amongst original studies, pharmacologic strategies were the most commonly studied intervention (n = 42 [57%]). Additional deprescribing strategies included psychological therapies (n = 10 [14%]), mixed interventions (n = 12 [16%]), and others (n = 10 [14%]). Behaviour change interventions were commonly combined and included enablement (n = 56 [76%]), education (n = 36 [47%]), and training (n = 29 [39%]). Gradual dose reduction was frequently a component of studies, reviews, and guidelines, but methods varied widely. CONCLUSIONS Approaches proposed for deprescribing benzodiazepines and Z-drugs are numerous and heterogeneous. Current research in this area using methods such as randomized trials and meta-analyses may too narrowly encompass potential strategies available to target this phenomenon. Realist synthesis methods would be well suited to understand the mechanisms by which deprescribing interventions work and why they fail.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- André S Pollmann
- Faculty of Medicine, Dalhousie University, Mail Box #259, 5849 University Avenue, Room C-125, PO Box 15000, Halifax, NS, B3H 4R2, Canada.
| | - Andrea L Murphy
- College of Pharmacy and Department of Psychiatry, Dalhousie University, 5968 College St, PO Box 15000, Halifax, NS, B3H 4R2, Canada.
| | - Joel C Bergman
- College of Pharmacy and Department of Psychiatry, Dalhousie University, 5968 College St, PO Box 15000, Halifax, NS, B3H 4R2, Canada.
| | - David M Gardner
- Department of Psychiatry and College of Pharmacy, Dalhousie University, QEII HSC, AJLB 7517, 5909 Veterans' Memorial Lane, Halifax, NS, B3H 2E2, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Affiliation(s)
- C Shawn Tracy
- Research scientist (Tracy), Medical Director (Upshur), Bridgepoint Hospital, and University of Toronto (Tracy, Fuller, Upshur), Toronto, Ont
| | - Jonathan Fuller
- Research scientist (Tracy), Medical Director (Upshur), Bridgepoint Hospital, and University of Toronto (Tracy, Fuller, Upshur), Toronto, Ont
| | - Ross E G Upshur
- Research scientist (Tracy), Medical Director (Upshur), Bridgepoint Hospital, and University of Toronto (Tracy, Fuller, Upshur), Toronto, Ont
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Kouladjian L, Gnjidic D, Chen TF, Mangoni AA, Hilmer SN. Drug Burden Index in older adults: theoretical and practical issues. Clin Interv Aging 2014; 9:1503-15. [PMID: 25246778 PMCID: PMC4166346 DOI: 10.2147/cia.s66660] [Citation(s) in RCA: 99] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Anticholinergic and sedative medications are commonly used in older adults and are associated with adverse clinical outcomes. The Drug Burden Index was developed to measure the cumulative exposure to these medications in older adults and its impact on physical and cognitive function. This narrative review discusses the research and clinical applications of the Drug Burden Index, and its advantages and limitations, compared with other pharmacologically developed measures of high-risk prescribing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lisa Kouladjian
- Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney, Kolling Institute of Medical Research and Departments of Clinical Pharmacology and Aged Care, Royal North Shore Hospital, NSW, Australia
| | - Danijela Gnjidic
- Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney, Kolling Institute of Medical Research and Departments of Clinical Pharmacology and Aged Care, Royal North Shore Hospital, NSW, Australia ; Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Timothy F Chen
- Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Arduino A Mangoni
- Department of Clinical Pharmacology, School of Medicine, Flinders University and Flinders Medical Centre, Bedford Park, SA, Australia
| | - Sarah N Hilmer
- Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney, Kolling Institute of Medical Research and Departments of Clinical Pharmacology and Aged Care, Royal North Shore Hospital, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|